Search Results

Search found 33585 results on 1344 pages for 'sql execution plan'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 539/1344 | < Previous Page | 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546  | Next Page >

  • How to make a Generic Repository?

    - by chobo2
    Hi I am wondering if anyone has any good tutorials(or maybe even a library that is already made and well documented) on making a generic repository. I am using currently linq to sql but it might change so I don't know if you can make a generic repository that would take little to no changes if I would say switch to entity framework. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Cannot figure out how to take in generic parameters for an Enterprise Framework library sql statemen

    - by KallDrexx
    I have written a specialized class to wrap up the enterprise library database functionality for easier usage. The reasoning for using the Enterprise Library is because my applications commonly connect to both oracle and sql server database systems. My wrapper handles both creating connection strings on the fly, connecting, and executing queries allowing my main code to only have to write a few lines of code to do database stuff and deal with error handling. As an example my ExecuteNonQuery method has the following declaration: /// <summary> /// Executes a query that returns no results (e.g. insert or update statements) /// </summary> /// <param name="sqlQuery"></param> /// <param name="parameters">Hashtable containing all the parameters for the query</param> /// <returns>The total number of records modified, -1 if an error occurred </returns> public int ExecuteNonQuery(string sqlQuery, Hashtable parameters) { // Make sure we are connected to the database if (!IsConnected) { ErrorHandler("Attempted to run a query without being connected to a database.", ErrorSeverity.Critical); return -1; } // Form the command DbCommand dbCommand = _database.GetSqlStringCommand(sqlQuery); // Add all the paramters foreach (string key in parameters.Keys) { if (parameters[key] == null) _database.AddInParameter(dbCommand, key, DbType.Object, null); else _database.AddInParameter(dbCommand, key, DbType.Object, parameters[key].ToString()); } return _database.ExecuteNonQuery(dbCommand); } _database is defined as private Database _database;. Hashtable parameters are created via code similar to p.Add("@param", value);. the issue I am having is that it seems that with enterprise library database framework you must declare the dbType of each parameter. This isn't an issue when you are calling the database code directly when forming the paramters but doesn't work for creating a generic abstraction class such as I have. In order to try and get around that I thought I could just use DbType.Object and figure the DB will figure it out based on the columns the sql is working with. Unfortunately, this is not the case as I get the following error: Implicit conversion from data type sql_variant to varchar is not allowed. Use the CONVERT function to run this query Is there any way to use generic parameters in a wrapper class or am I just going to have to move all my DB code into my main classes?

    Read the article

  • Table Valued UDF vs Views

    - by vaibhav
    I have never used UDF in sql server. Today I got to know that we can have functions which can return a table. So I just wanted to know can I use functions in place of views. If yes, which one is the better choice and why

    Read the article

  • Multiple select statement in stored procedure

    - by GigaPr
    Hi, i have a stored procedure that has to retrieve data from multiple tables something like SELECT [AppointmentId] ,[ContactId] ,[Date] ,[BookedBy] ,[Details] ,[Status] ,[Time] ,[Type] ,[JobId] ,[AppointmentFor] ,(Select PersonFirstName from Person where Person_Id = [AppointmentFor]) As UserFirstName ,(Select PersonLastName from Person where Person_Id = [AppointmentFor]) As UserLastName ,(Select PersonFirstName from Person where Person_Id = [ContactId]) As ContactFirstName ,(Select PersonLastName from Person where Person_Id = [ContactId]) As ContactLastName FROM [dbo].[Appointments] my question is there is any other more efficient way to do this? Or is this the right approach? I am working on a Sql server 2008 Thanks

    Read the article

  • Output TSQL result to textfile in script

    - by Nev_Rahd
    Is there a way to directly write result returned from TSQL / stored procedure to a text file (not using CTRL + T = Result to Text). As this TSQL will be dynamic in one of my service routine. Whenever I call this service routine it generates SQL Statement = executes and here I want to direct it to text file by passing the filepath as parameter. How can this be done ? Thanks

    Read the article

  • MVC-like Autogenerated Pages for Webforms

    - by CccTrash
    I noticed that MVC lets you pass in LINQ to SQL objects to its views and it will autogenerate Create, Update and View Pages based on the LINQtoSQL object. Is there anything for webforms that lets you do this kind of thing? (In a nice way with validators maybe?)

    Read the article

  • upsert with addition

    - by cf_PhillipSenn
    How would you write the following in Microsoft SQL Server 2008? IF EXISTS(SELECT * FROM Table WHERE Something=1000) UPDATE Table SET Qty = Qty + 1 WHERE Something=1000 ELSE INSERT INTO Table(Something,Qty) VALUES(1000,1)

    Read the article

  • Is defragging tough on replication?

    - by Jim
    I've been told that defragging causes the log to grow tremendously. Is this true? If so, is there something better to do than defragging that will not impact the log as much? We are running SQL Server 2005 replicating between 2 sites.

    Read the article

  • How to get column value into row header

    - by Dharmendra Mohapatra
    ID amount year 1 300 02-02-2010 00:00 2 400 02-02-2009 00:00 3 200 02-02-2011 00:00 4 300 22-02-2010 00:00 5 400 12-02-2009 00:00 6 500 22-02-2009 00:00 7 600 02-02-2006 00:00 8 700 02-07-2012 00:00 9 500 08-02-2012 00:00 10 800 09-02-2011 00:00 11 500 06-02-2010 00:00 12 600 01-02-2011 00:00 13 300 02-02-2019 00:00 Desired output Y1 Y2 Y3 ........... sum(amount) sum(amount) sum(amount) Please suggest a approach Y1 is the year part of the date so my result column would be 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 600 1300 800 1900 1200 Thanks. DB- MYSQL, SQL SERVER Thanks.

    Read the article

  • java.sql.SQLException: database locked

    - by rajkumari
    Hello We are using sqllite056 jar in our code. While inserting into database in batch we are getting exception on line when we going to commit. Lines of Code <object of Connection> .commit(); <object of Connection>.setAutoCommit(true); Exception java.sql.SQLException: database locked

    Read the article

  • Advanced count and join in Rails

    - by trobrock
    I am try to find the top n number of categories as they relate to articles, there is a habtm relationship set up between the two. This is the SQL I want to execute, but am unsure of how to do this with ActiveRecord, aside from using the find_by_sql method. is there any way of doing this with ActiveRecord methods: SELECT "categories".id, "categories".name, count("articles".id) as counter FROM "categories" JOIN "articles_categories" ON "articles_categories".category_id = "categories".id JOIN "articles" ON "articles".id = "articles_categories".article_id GROUP BY "categories".id ORDER BY counter DESC LIMIT 5;

    Read the article

  • [ADO.NET ERRROR]: CREATE DATABASE permission denied in database 'master'. An attempt to attach an au

    - by Mark Cidade
    Anyone seen this before? CREATE DATABASE permission denied in database 'master'. An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file C:\Documents and Settings\..\App_Data\HelloWorld.mdf failed. A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share. I'm asking on a friend's behalf. I've sent him these links: http://blog.benhall.me.uk/2008/03/sql-server-and-vista-create-database.html http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=702726&SiteID=1

    Read the article

  • SQL SERVER - Detecting non-indexed columns but used in WHERE clause

    - by Vadi
    How to detect a column included in WHERE clause but used in indexed? Little Background: Until the time the table has few number of records things will be okay, once it started having millions of records then index should be created for a column which is used in WHERE clauses in stored procs, inline queries etc., Since we have hundreds of stored procs and queries that often gets changed by the devs I wanted to have a automated way of identifying those columns that are used in WHERE clauses but not an index is created. How to do that in SQL SERVER 2008?

    Read the article

  • .NET Data Provider for SqlServer

    - by DMcKenna
    Has anybody managed to get the ".NET Data Provider for SqlServer" to actually work within perfmon.exe. I have a .NET app that uses nhibernate to interact with sql server 2005 db. All I want to do is to view the NumberOfActiveConnectionPools, NumberOfActiveConnections and the NumberOfFreeConnections within perfmon.exe Can somebody explain to me how exactly I get this to work? Regards, David

    Read the article

  • MSSQL 2005: Update rows in a specified order (like ORDER BY)?

    - by JMTyler
    I want to update rows of a table in a specific order, like one would expect if including an ORDER BY clause, but MS SQL does not support the ORDER BY clause in UPDATE queries. I have checked out this question which supplied a nice solution, but my query is a bit more complicated than the one specified there. UPDATE TableA AS Parent SET Parent.ColA = Parent.ColA + (SELECT TOP 1 Child.ColA FROM TableA AS Child WHERE Child.ParentColB = Parent.ColB ORDER BY Child.Priority) ORDER BY Parent.Depth DESC; So, what I'm hoping that you'll notice is that a single table (TableA) contains a hierarchy of rows, wherein one row can be the parent or child of any other row. The rows need to be updated in order from the deepest child up to the root parent. This is because TableA.ColA must contain an up-to-date concatenation of its own current value with the values of its children (I realize this query only concats with one child, but that is for the sake of simplicity - the purpose of the example in this question does not necessitate any more verbosity), therefore the query must update from the bottom up. The solution suggested in the question I noted above is as follows: UPDATE messages SET status=10 WHERE ID in (SELECT TOP (10) Id FROM Table WHERE status=0 ORDER BY priority DESC ); The reason that I don't think I can use this solution is because I am referencing column values from the parent table inside my subquery (see WHERE Child.ParentColB = Parent.ColB), and I don't think two sibling subqueries would have access to each others' data. So far I have only determined one way to merge that suggested solution with my current problem, and I don't think it works. UPDATE TableA AS Parent SET Parent.ColA = Parent.ColA + (SELECT TOP 1 Child.ColA FROM TableA AS Child WHERE Child.ParentColB = Parent.ColB ORDER BY Child.Priority) WHERE Parent.Id IN (SELECT Id FROM TableA ORDER BY Parent.Depth DESC); The WHERE..IN subquery will not actually return a subset of the rows, it will just return the full list of IDs in the order that I want. However (I don't know for sure - please tell me if I'm wrong) I think that the WHERE..IN clause will not care about the order of IDs within the parentheses - it will just check the ID of the row it currently wants to update to see if it's in that list (which, they all are) in whatever order it is already trying to update... Which would just be a total waste of cycles, because it wouldn't change anything. So, in conclusion, I have looked around and can't seem to figure out a way to update in a specified order (and included the reason I need to update in that order, because I am sure I would otherwise get the ever-so-useful "why?" answers) and I am now hitting up Stack Overflow to see if any of you gurus out there who know more about SQL than I do (which isn't saying much) know of an efficient way to do this. It's particularly important that I only use a single query to complete this action. A long question, but I wanted to cover my bases and give you guys as much info to feed off of as possible. :) Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • How to group a database write and spreadsheet write in single "transaction"

    - by WhyGeeEx
    I have a Java program that writes results to both a DB (SQL Server) and a spreadsheet (POI), and it would be best if neither is written to if there's an error with either. It would be a lot worse if the spreadsheet was produced and then an error happened while saving to the DB, so I'm doing the DB-write first. Even so, I'm wondering if someone knows of a way to guarantee they both succeed or fail as a unit. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Output Parameter Not Returned

    - by Mark Plumpton
    Why does this script return a pair of nulls? I'm using SQL Server 2008, script run in MSSMS. CREATE PROCEDURE proc_Test ( @Input int, @Out1 int OUTPUT, @Out2 varchar(10) OUTPUT ) AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT OFF SET @Out1 = 100 + @Input SET @Out2 = 'result=' + CONVERT(varchar,@Out1) RETURN END GO DECLARE @Out1 int, @Out2 varchar(10) exec proc_Test @Input=1, @Out1=@Out1, @Out2=@Out2 select @Out1, @Out2

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546  | Next Page >