Search Results

Search found 20929 results on 838 pages for 'check mk'.

Page 54/838 | < Previous Page | 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61  | Next Page >

  • Check for state change in objects using serialization?

    - by sev7n
    I have a form that is bind to an object, and when the user trying to leave the form, I want to warn them if anything on the form has been changed, and prompt them to save. My question is, is there any way to achieve this without implementing IComparar for all my classes in the binded object? I was thinking if there is a way I can serialize my object when loading the form, and do a simple comparison against the change object that also get serialized. Something like a string comparison. Hope that make sense, Thanks

    Read the article

  • Check the code n point the mistake

    - by Vibha
    here is the code: Ext.onReady(function(){ alert("inside onReady"); Ext.QuickTips.init(); var employee = Ext.data.Record.create([ {name:'firstname'}, {name:'lastname'}]); var myReader = new Ext.data.JsonReader({ root:"EmpInfo", },employee); var store = new Ext.data.JsonStore({ id:'ID' ,root:'EmpInfo' ,totalProperty:'totalCount' ,url:'test.php' ,autoLoad:true ,fields:[ {name:'firstname', type:'string'} ,{name:'lastname', type:'string'} ] }); var myPanel = new Ext.grid.GridPanel({ store: store ,columns:[{ dataIndex:'firstname' ,header:'First Name' ,width:139 },{ dataIndex:'lastname' ,header:'Middle Name' ,width:139 } ] }); var myWindow = new Ext.Window({ width:300, height:300, layout:'fit', closable:false, resizable:false, items:[myPanel] }); myWindow.show(); }); And php code is: true, "data" = array( "firstname" = "ABC" , "lastname" = "MNO") ); $_SESSION["err"] = isset($_SESSION["err"]) ? !$_SESSION["err"] : true; header("Content-Type: application/json"); echo json_encode($o); ? I want to print the values ABC and MNO in the grid panel. i'm using extjs 2.3. please help me out. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to check for exception further down a pipeline

    - by laertejuniordba
    Hi all I am using New-Object System.Management.Automation.PipelineStoppedException To stop the pipeline OK..works.. But how Can I test in the next cmdlet if was stopped ? Foo1 | foo2 | foo3 Stop in foo1, but goes to foo2. I want to test if was stopped in foo1 to stop too in each function function foo1 { process { try { #do } catch { New-Object System.Management.Automation.PipelineStoppedException } } } and still going to the next cmdlet, as stopped by error I want to stop in each next cmdlets..:) Thanks !!!

    Read the article

  • How to check a complex condition in Smarty(PHP)

    - by php html
    I need to display a section or another in a smarty template. My condition is simple: if a smarty value starts with a string I should display one section, otherwise the other smarty section should be displayed. I can change only the tpl files. {php} if (substr($url,0,4) != 'http') { {/php} section 1 {php} } else { {/php} section 2 {php} } {/php} The problem is that I can not read the url varible which was previously assigned using $smarty-assign. Basically, I'm looking for the smarty function that can be used to retrieve a value, or if there is a better solution.

    Read the article

  • How to get result size from an SQL query and check size

    - by Jimmy
    Hi I'm trying to write a piece of code for a simple verification method as part of a MVC. At present the SQL is not written as a prepared statement so obviously it is at risk to a SQL injection so any help in regards to writing the SQL as a prepared statement would be really helpful. The method which is in the User model. public boolean getLoginInfo() { try { DBAccess dbAccess = new DBAccess(); String sql = "SELECT username, password FROM owner WHERE username = '" + this.username + "'AND password = '" + this.password + "';"; dbAccess.close();dbAccess.executeQuery(sql); dbAccess.close(); return true; } catch (Exception e) { return false; } } I want to get the size of the result set which is generated by the SQL query and if the size of it is 1 return true else it's false. If you need more info on the rest of the MVC just post and I'll get it up here.

    Read the article

  • CSS check for Chrome, IE, Firefox

    - by hankh
    I've noticed a small alignment issue in the three major browsers when rendering my web site. As such how can I perform the following pseudo-code with pure CSS? if Webkit (Safari/Chrome) { #myDIV {margin-top:-3px} } else if (Firefox) { #myDIV {margin-top:0px} } else { // IE and other browsers #myDIV {margin-top:1px} }

    Read the article

  • Background Worker Check For When It's Midnight?

    - by Soo
    I want to create a background worker for a WinForm that triggers code whenever midnight rolls by. I have an idea of how to do it, but I'm pretty sure it's not the best way to do it. while(1==1) { //if Datetime.Now == midnight, execute code //sleep(1second) }

    Read the article

  • C# Events and Lambdas, alternative to null check?

    - by Eugarps
    Does anybody see any drawbacks? It should be noted that you can't remove anonymous methods from an event delegate list, I'm aware of that (actually that was the conceptual motivation for this). The goal here is an alternative to: if (onFoo != null) onFoo.Invoke(this, null); And the code: public delegate void FooDelegate(object sender, EventArgs e); public class EventTest { public EventTest() { onFoo += (p,q) => { }; } public FireFoo() { onFoo.Invoke(this, null); } public event FooDelegate onFoo; }

    Read the article

  • check whether fgets would block

    - by lv
    Hi, I was just wondering whether in C is it possible to peek in the input buffer or perform similar trickery to know whether a call to fgets would block at a later time. Java allows to do something like that by calling BufferedReader.ready(), this way I can implement console input something like this: while (on && in.ready()) { line = in.readLine(); /* do something with line */ if (!in.ready()) Thread.sleep(100); } this allows an external thread to gracefully shutdown the input loop by setting on to false; I'd like to perform a similar implementation in C without resorting to non portable tricks, I already know I can make a "timed out fgets" under unix by resorting to signals or (better, even though requering to take care of buffering) reimplement it on top of recv/select, but I'd prefer something that would work on windows too. TIA

    Read the article

  • problem while checking second check checkbox checked.

    - by kumar
    $('#nextpage').click(function() { $('#Details input[type=checkbox]').each( function() { if( $(this).attr('checked') ) { $("#tabs").tabs('enable', 3).tabs('select', 3); } else { $().ShowDialog('please select atleast one'); } }); }); <fieldset> <legend>information</legend> <input type="checkbox"> <label>ID#: <span><%=(null != a) ? Model.ID: 0%></span></label> <label>Name:<span><%=(null != a) ? Model.Name: null%></span></label> </fieldset> this filedset is for multiple users.. that is on the same page there are multiple fiedsetsfor multiple users.. how to handle those things.. thanks

    Read the article

  • PHP Check slave status without mysql_connect timeout issues

    - by Jonathon
    I have a web-app that has a master mysql db and four slave dbs. I want to handle all (or almost all) read-only (SELECT) queries from the slaves. Our load-balancer sends the user to one of the slave machines automatically, since they are also running Apache/PHP and serving webpages. I am using an include file to setup the connection to the databases, such as: //for master server (i.e. - UPDATE/INSERT/DELETE statements) $Host = "10.0.0.x"; $User = "xx"; $Password = "xx"; $Link = mysql_connect( $Host, $User, $Password ); if( !$Link ) ) { die( "Master database is currently unavailable. Please try again later." ); } //this connection can be used for READ-ONLY (i.e. - SELECT statements) on the localhost $Host_Local = "localhost"; $User_Local = "xx"; $Password_Local = "xx"; $Link_Local = mysql_connect( $Host_Local, $User_Local, $Password_Local ); //fail back to master if slave db is down if( !$Link_Local ) ) { $Link_Local = mysql_connect( $Host, $User, $Password ); } I then use $Link for all update queries and $Link_Local as the connection for SELECT statements. Everything works fine until the slave server database goes down. If the local db is down, the $Link_Local = mysql_connect() call takes at least 30 seconds before it gives up on trying to connect to the localhost and returns back to the script. This causes a huge backlog of page serves and basically shuts down the system (due to the extremely slow response time). Does anyone know of a better way to handle connections to slave servers via PHP? Or, is there some kind of timeout function that could be used to stop the mysql_connect call after 2-3 seconds? Thanks for the help. I searched the other mysql_connect threads, but didn't see any that addressed this issue.

    Read the article

  • How to check if EditText has a value in Android / Java

    - by Allen Gingrich
    This should be simple, but I have tried if statements checking for null values and also ones checking the .length of it: EditText marketValLow = (EditText) findViewById(R.id.marketValLow); EditText marketValHigh = (EditText) findViewById(R.id.marketValHigh); if (marketValLow.getText().length() != 0 && marketValHigh.getText().length() != 0) { Intent intent = new Intent(); intent.setClass(v.getContext(), CurrentlyOwe.class); startActivity(intent); } else { Toast.makeText(CurrentMarketValue.this, "You need to enter a high AND low.", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT); } But it doesn't detect nothing was entered. Any ideas? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Overriding check box in JavaScript with jQuery

    - by Gutzofter
    Help with unit testing checkbox behavior. I have this page: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title></title> <script type="text/javascript" src="../js/jquery-1.4.2.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { $('<div><input type="checkbox" name="makeHidden" id="makeHidden" checked="checked" />Make Hidden</div>').appendTo('body'); $('<div id="displayer" style="display:none;">Was Hidden</div>').appendTo('body'); $('#makeHidden').click(function() { var isChecked = $(this).is(':checked'); if (isChecked) { $('#displayer').hide(); } else { $('#displayer').show(); } return false; }); }); </script> </head> <body> </body> </html> This doesn't work it is because of the return false; in the click handler. If I remove it it works great. The problem is if I pull the click function out into it's own function and unit test it with qunit it will not work without the return false;

    Read the article

  • Bash script to (more or less) reliably check if the internet is up

    - by João Portela
    I need a bash script to put in a cron job that every minute checks if the internet is up. This is how I did it: #! /bin/sh host1=google.com host2=wikipedia.org curr_date=`date +"%Y%m%d%H%M"` echo -n "${curr_date};" ((ping -w5 -c3 $host1 || ping -w5 -c3 $host2) > /dev/null 2>&1) && echo "up" || (echo "down" && exit 1) How would you do it? Which hosts would you ping? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • check if a tree is complete standard ml

    - by aizen92
    I want to make a function in standard ml that checks if a tree is complete or not, the function somehow works, but its giving me the wrong type and a warning of non-exhaustive cases The tree code: datatype 'data tree = EMPTY | NODE of 'data tree * 'data * 'data tree; fun isComplete EMPTY = true | isComplete (NODE(x, y, z)) = if (x = EMPTY andalso z <> EMPTY) orelse (x <> EMPTY andalso z = EMPTY) then false else true; Now the above function's type is: ''a tree -> bool but the required type is 'a tree -> bool The warning I'm having is: stdIn:169.8 Warning: calling polyEqual stdIn:169.26 Warning: calling polyEqual stdIn:169.45-169.47 Warning: calling polyEqual stdIn:169.64-169.66 Warning: calling polyEqual stdIn:124.1-169.94 Warning: match nonexhaustive NODE (x,y,z) => ... What is the problem I'm having?

    Read the article

  • Python - how to check if weak reference is still available

    - by Alex
    Hi all, I am passing some weakrefs from Python into C++ class, but C++ destructors are actively trying to access the ref when the real object is already dead, obviously it crashes... Is there any Python C/API approach to find out if Python reference is still alive or any other known workaround for this ? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Creating an Attribute to check for Exceptions

    - by BiffBaffBoff
    I'm creating an attribute so that whenever an exception occurs on my site, I'll receive an email detailing the exception. I've got so far but my Attribute code doesn't seem to fire if an exception occurs: public class ReportingAttribute : FilterAttribute, IExceptionFilter { public void OnException(ExceptionContext filterContext) { // This will generate an email to me ErrorReporting.GenerateEmail(filterContext.Exception); } } Then above my Controller I'm doing: [ReportingAttribute] public class AccountController : Controller The other way to do it is ofcourse putting ErrorReporting.GenerateEmail(ex) inside my catch blocks? There must be a simpler way? Thats why I thought of creating the Attribute to handle this

    Read the article

  • Check a list of packages to install with apt-get

    - by Joel
    I am writing a post-install script for Ubuntu in Perl (same script as seen here). One of the steps is to install a list of packages. The problem is that if apt-get install fails in some of many different ways for any one of the packages the script dies badly. I would like to prevent that from happening. This happens because of the ways that apt-get install fails for packages that it doesn't like. For example when I try to install a nonsense word (i.e. typed in the wrong package name) $ sudo apt-get install oblihbyvl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package oblihbyvl but if instead the package name has been obsoleted (installing handbrake from ppa) $ sudo apt-get install handbrake Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package handbrake is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'handbrake' has no installation candidate $ apt-cache search handbrake handbrake-cli - versatile DVD ripper and video transcoder - command line handbrake-gtk - versatile DVD ripper and video transcoder - GTK GUI I have tried parsing the results of apt-cache and apt-get -s install to try to catch all possibilities before doing the install, but I seem to keep finding new ways to allow failures to continue to the actual install system command. My question is, is there some facility either in Perl (e.g. a module, though I would like to avoid installing modules if possible as this is supposed to be the first thing run after a new install of Ubuntu) or apt-* or dpkg that would let me be sure that the packages are all available to be installed before installing and if not fail gracefully in some way that lets the user decide what to do?

    Read the article

  • Use deployJava.js to check for/automatically install latest JRE version for web applet

    - by Pryo
    I'd like to use the deployJava.js tool to have Java automatically detect the currently installed JRE and install an updated version if necessary. My initial impression when reading about deployJava.js was that it would do this out of the box when you simply set a version number as a function parameter for the "runApplet" function. But this has never seemed to work. Is it even possible to do this, and if so, how? Here is my current code for launching my applet: <script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.java.com/js/deployJava.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var attributes = {id:"applet", name:"TheApplet", code:"TheApplet"}; var parameters = {jnlp_href: "http://localhost/TheApplet.jnlp"}; deployJava.runApplet(attributes, parameters, "1.6.0_31"); </script> Thanks

    Read the article

  • check if a line is valid or not in Java

    - by Adnan
    I would like to perform checking on the following: VALID LINES; /**/ some code */ some code /** dsfsdkf sd**/ NOT VALID LINES; /**/ //some code */ /***/ //somecode So basically if there is a line of code outside a comment it is valid, otherwise not. What would be the best way to tackle this kind of validation? Note: For */ I assume that the /* has been opened some lines before.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61  | Next Page >