Search Results

Search found 3409 results on 137 pages for 'distributed computing'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 55/137 | < Previous Page | 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62  | Next Page >

  • Cisco UCS Buyer's Guide

    Cisco entered the server market in 2009 with its Unified Computing System, a series of blades and a chassis designed to simplify deployment, particularly for virtualized environments. See how its offerings compare to those of the more established players.

    Read the article

  • Cisco UCS Buyer's Guide

    Cisco entered the server market in 2009 with its Unified Computing System, a series of blades and a chassis designed to simplify deployment, particularly for virtualized environments. See how its offerings compare to those of the more established players.

    Read the article

  • New Video: Oracle and Intel Collaboration

    - by Cinzia Mascanzoni
    We just published a webcast discussing the technical collaboration between Oracle and Intel. The panel highlights the recent collaborations on elastic computing, Oracle Database In-Memory, and the newly announced products Exadata Database Machine X4-8 and Sun Server X4-8. In addition, panelists reflect on the specific technical advances that have resulted from over twenty years of partnership.

    Read the article

  • Acer Aspire AS5738PG Netbook review

    <b>Linux User and Developer:</b> "For a Linux developer interested in touch computing, the Acer 5738 represents an interesting option for developing touch-screen apps and working with eventual touch versions of Linux distros."

    Read the article

  • Microsoft sort SQL Server 2014 CTP 2 et vante ses nouvelles capacités In-Memory permettant d'accélérer 30 fois les performances

    Microsoft sort SQL Server 2014 CTP 2 et vante ses nouvelles capacités In-Memory permettant d'accélérer 30 fois les performancesMicrosoft a profité de son salon Pass Summit 2013 dédié à SQL Server pour dévoiler la CTP 2 de sa plateforme de gestion de données moderne SQL Server 2014.SQL Server 2014 est conçu autour de trois objectifs majeurs : offrir un système de base de données « In-Memory », de nouvelles capacités Cloud pour simplifier l'adoption du Cloud Computing pour les bases de données SQL...

    Read the article

  • Free APress e-book on GIT!

    - by TATWORTH
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/TATWORTH/archive/2013/07/24/free-apress-e-book-on-git.aspxA free e-book in PDF, mobi and ePub formats is available at http://git-scm.com/book"Programmers or project leaders will learn to use Git, the version control system developed by Linus Torvalds for Linux kernel development. You'll discover the world of distributed version control and learn how to build a Git development workflow, with expert guidance from Scott Chacon."

    Read the article

  • Small Business Software: OpenOffice.org vs. Google Docs

    <b>Small Business Computing:</b> "Microsoft is getting ready to ship Office 2010, but a lot of small businesses realize they don't need all the features (or licensing costs) that come with Microsoft Office. The front-runners for Office replacements are OpenOffice.org and Google Docs, but which one is right for your business?"

    Read the article

  • IO Profiling of Applications: MPI Apps

    <b>Linux Magazine:</b> "In the last article we looked at using strace to examine the IO patterns of simple serial applications. In the High Performance Computing (HPC) world, applications use MPI (Message Passing Interface) to create parallel applications. This time around we discuss how to attack parallel applications using strace."

    Read the article

  • Windows Azure fête ses un an, utilisez-vous et connaissez-vous bien la plateforme Cloud de Microsoft dédiée aux développeurs ?

    Windows Azure fête ses un an Utilisez-vous et connaissez-vous la plateforme Cloud de Microsoft dédiée aux développeurs ? En collaboration avec Hinault Romarick Le virage de Microsoft vers le Cloud Computing a été marqué par la sortie de plusieurs produits (Dynamic CRM OnLine, Office 365, les Office Web Apps, etc.). Mais c'est bien l'arrivée de sa plate-forme dédiée aux développeurs, Windows Azure, qui a montré son implication dans le IaaS (Infrastructure à la demande) et le PaaS (Plateforme à la demande). Présentée pour la première fois lors de la conférence PDC 2008, c'est en ...

    Read the article

  • How to Detect and Fix Table Corruption in Oracle?

    Oracle is an RDBMS (Relational Database Management System), developed and marketed by Oracle Corporation. It has a major presence in database computing. It stores all your valuable data in the DBF fi... [Author: Mark Willium - Computers and Internet - May 13, 2010]

    Read the article

  • Top Exastack Partner Headlines - 7 Nov

    - by Roxana Babiciu
    R-Style Softlab recommends RS-solutions with Exadata and SuperCluster to improve business performance for their customers. Read more. WingArc, a subsidiary of 1st Holdings, Inc., finds Oracle Exadata’s substantial computing power enabling to their enterprise output management solution (SVF/RD). It helps solve the problem of providing an integrated output platform for high volume businesses. Read more.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Subscribes To The Big Data Journal: So Can You!

    - by Roxana Babiciu
    Oracle Product Development has funded access to the Big Data Journal for all Oracle employees. Big Data is a highly innovative, open-access, peer-reviewed journal of world-class research, exploring the challenges and opportunities in collecting, analyzing, and disseminating vast amounts of data. This includes data science, big data infrastructure and analytics, and pervasive computing. Register here to receive Big Data articles online or sign up for the table of content alert or the RSS feed.

    Read the article

  • ?????QCon Tokyo 2010 ??????????!

    - by rika.tokumichi
    ??????OTN????????? 2010?4?19??20??????????·??????????QCon Tokyo 2010?????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????! ??????????????????????????????????^^ ???????????! >QCon Tokyo 2010 ????? ?????????? ????????????????? -------------------------------------------- ???:?? ?? (???? ????) ?????????????? - ????????CoE - ?????????? BI/SOA????????????? ???:?? ?? (???? ?????) ?????????? - ????????? - ??????????? -------------------------------------------- ??????????????????????????????????QCon Tokyo 2010?????????? QCon????????????????????????????InfoQ???????????????????????????????????????·?????????? ????????????4???????????????????????????????·?????????? InfoQ????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?1??? ??????????????Twitter????Nick Kallen??????????? ??????Data Architecture at Twitter Scale?? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????120????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Twitter????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????Oracle Coherence????????????Patrick Peralta??? ?Connected Clouds: A Platform for Globally Distributed Service? ??????????????? Coherence????????KVS??????????????????????????????????????Oracle Coherence?????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????Coherence?Push Replication Pattern?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????????????2???3??????????? ???????????????????????????????! ??????????????????????????????? ?2??? 2??????????????Facebook?Marc Kwiatkowski?????????? ??????Scaling Memcache at Facebook?? 4??????????Facebook???????memcache??????????????????????????????????????? ?????????memchace????????????????????????????????memcache???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????? Java7???????????????????????????????????? Ruby??????????????????????????????Ruby????????? ??????????????????????????? ???????????????! --------------------------------------- ?????????????????????????!! ???????????! ???????2?????????? ??????????????????????????? >QCon Tokyo 2010 ????? ?????????&??????? ?????????????Patrick Peralta?????????? >?????Connected Clouds: A Platform for Globally Distributed Service?(??) by Patrick Peralta ?Oracle Coherence????? ???? ?????? ???????????? Oracle Coherence?????(??????????) OTN????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? >???????????????????1(?????? ???) >???????????????????2(???????) ???????????????????????????????????????????????????!

    Read the article

  • curl http_code of 000

    - by Mikkel Paulson
    I have a shell script that I use to monitor loading times and response codes on my live server cluster. It runs a total of 250 iterations every 5 minutes, distributed across 10 servers and 6 sites. It uses curl with the -w flag to return pertinent information which is then parsed by my shell script: curl -svw 'monitor_load_times %{time_total} %{http_code}' -b 'server=$server' -m 15 -o /dev/null $url 2>&1 This information is then parsed by a graphing script that can display a number of different responses. However, curl will occasionally return a response code of "000". When this happens, it seems to happen multiple times at once despite being distributed over many iterations: What I'm trying to work out is if this is a client-side issue that's skewing my results or if it's actually indicative of a server-side problem affecting my entire cluster. Does 000 mean that the connection was dropped? Database entries corresponding to curl iterations with that response code return "0.000" for the time_total value. All of the search results I've found for curl returning a code of 000 are related to HTTPS being unsupported, but all of my test URLs are HTTP. (The spike in 500 errors is a completely unrelated issue that affected my servers last night.)

    Read the article

  • GlusterFS on VMWare ESXi 5

    - by Dharmavir
    I want to build network file system on top of my VMWare ESXi based virtual nodes which are running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I am evalaluating options and found that GlusterFS (http://www.gluster.org/) can turn out to be a good choice. Purpose: I have about 2 dozen VM nodes with different configurations, on 2 physical nodes which has following configuration: 16 core Intel Xeon 1 TB 48 GB RAM Now as I said earlier each Physical server has about 1TB hdd and I can increase if I want additional so for now I have 2TB disk space available, these space is distributed in VM nodes I have created on which about 2 dozen VM nodes live. Now some of them being application server and mgmt server, they have plenty of free disk space which I want to utilize for some heavy storage which I can not design if I do that individually on single VM node. This way if my storage is distributed between dozens of VM nodes and about 2 or more physical nodes I have some sort of backup as well. I do not mind if data gets stored redundently but per my knowledge it might hapeen that individual VM nodes will not be able to store all of the data because complete data size for example if we take 100GB will exceed VM disk size of 70GB and then VM will also have system and program files on it. I need some suggestion that will GlusterFS be the solution for which I am looking forward to or I should go with something like hadoop? I am not too sure. But yes, I would like to utilize my free space on each VM node and while doing that if I get store data redundently I am okay because it will give me data security.

    Read the article

  • Request bursting from web application Load Tests

    - by MaseBase
    I'm migrating our web and database hosting to a new environment on all new machines. I've recently performed a Load Test using WAPT to generate load from multiple distributed clients. The server has plenty of room to handle the traffic load, but I'm seeing an odd pattern of incoming traffic during the load tests. Here is the gist of our setup: Firewall server running MS Forefront TMG 2010 on Win 2k8 server Request routing done by IIS Application Request Routing on firewall machine Web server is a Hyper-V VM on the Database server (which is the host OS) These machines are hefty with dual-CPU's with six cores (12 total procs) Web server running IIS 7.5 Web applications built in ASP.NET 2.0, with 1 ISAPI filter (Url Rewrite) in front What I'm seeing during the load tests is that the requests all come through in bursts. Even though I have 7 different distributed clients sending traffic loads, the requests come through about 300-500 requests at a time. The performance monitor shows nearly all of the counters moving through this pattern, where a burst of requests comes in the req/sec jumps to 70, the queued requests jumps to 500, the current requests jumps up, the CPU jumps up, everything. Then once it's handled that group of requests, it has a lull for nearly 10 seconds where nearly nothing is happening. 0-5 req/sec, 0 queued requests, minimal CPU usage. Then after 10 seconds of inactivity, another burst comes through, spiking all of the counters once again. What I can't figure out is why the requests are coming through in bursts when I know that the load being generated is not sent that way, especially considering the various load-generating clients sending traffic all in different intervals with random think time's between each request. Is there something in the layers between Hyper-V or perhaps in the hardware which might cause this coalesce of requests together? Here is what i'm looking at, the highlighted metric is Requests/sec, but the others critical counter go with it: Requests Queued (which I'd obviously like to keep as close to 0 as possible). Any ideas on this?

    Read the article

  • Very uneven CPU utilization with SQL Server 2012 on 2 processor computer with 16 cores / processor

    - by cooplarsh
    After installing SQL Server Enterprise 2012 with the Server + Cal license model, on a computer with 2 processors each with 16 cores (and no hyperthreading involved) and putting the server under extremely heavy load the 16 cores on the first processor were very underutilized, the first 4 cores on the 2nd CPU were heavily utilized, and the last 12 cores were not used at all (because of the 20 core limit for this sql server version). Total CPU utilization was displaying as around 25%. Unfortunately, the server suffered from extremely poor performance even though if the tasks were evenly distributed across the 20 cores it wouldn't have been anywhere near as bad. The Windows Server was running on a VMWare virtual image under ESX Server, but all of the CPU was allocated to the windows server. We tried changing affinity settings (e.g., allocating most cores to CPU and the others to I/O), but that didn't help solve the performance problems. Upgrading the product edition to SQL Server Enterprise Core 2012 not only allowed the SQL Server to utilize the 12 previously unused cores on the 2nd processor, but it also resulted in a much more even distribution of tasks across all of the processors. To get through the backlog of requests cpU utilization jumped to around 90%, and then came down to around 33% once it was caught up, but performance improved dramatically since we failed over to the newly updated version And the performance issues went away. I was wondering if anyone knows what might cause SQL Server to unevenly distribute the load, relying almost exclusively on the first 4 cores of the 2nd processor that had 12 cores idle, and allocate only a few tasks to each of the 16 cores on the first processor. Also, is there any way we could have more evenly distributed the load across the 20 cores that were being used without the product edition upgrade? The flip side of that question is what did the product upgrade do that caused SQL Server to start evenly distributing the load across all of the cores that it recognized? Thanks to any insight to answer these questions and/or links that might help me better understand how to make sense of what was happenings.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62  | Next Page >