There are quite a few ways to write plugins i.e. here's a nice example and what I've seen quite a lot of lately is the following code pattern and it's used by Doug Neiner here;
(function($){
$.formatLink = function(el, options){
var base = this;
base.$el = $(el);
base.el = el;
base.$el.data("formatLink", base);
base.init = function(){
base.options = $.extend({}, $.formatLink.defaultOptions, options);
//code here
}
base.init();
};
$.formatLink.defaultOptions = { };
$.fn.formatLink = function(options){
return this.each(function(){
(new $.formatLink(this, options));
});
};
})(jQuery);
So, can anyone tell me the benefits of using the pattern above rather than the one below. I can't see the point in calling the $.extend function for every element in the jQuery stack (above), where the example below only does this once and then works on the stack.
To test it I created two plugins, using both patterns, which applied styles to about 5000 li elements and the code below took about 1 second whereas the pattern above took about 1.3 seconds.
(function($){
$.fn.formatLink = function(options){
var options = $.extend({}, $.fn.formatLink.defaultOptions, options || {});
return this.each(function(){
//code here
});
});
$.fn.formatLink.defaultOptions ={}
})(jQuery);
