Search Results

Search found 24284 results on 972 pages for 'javascript intellisense'.

Page 580/972 | < Previous Page | 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587  | Next Page >

  • element height after content change

    - by Neph
    I have a snippet of code that alters the contents of a DIV to match the contents of a textarea and then applies the height change in the DIV to the textarea element. function growTextArea(parameter) { $('div').find("[data-fieldid='1_description']").text($(parameter).val()); // No Works height = $('.hiddenDiv').find("[data-fieldid='1_description']").outerHeight(); alert(height); // Works heightDiv = $('.hiddenDiv').outerHeight(); alert(heightDiv); $(parameter).css('height', $('div').find("[data-fieldid='1_description']").outerHeight()); } The DIV contents change properly, so the search function is working properly, however the search function always returns the original height of the DIV. The function is called by onKeyUp in the textarea. If the .find is swapped out for a .hiddenDiv the height change is reflected properly.

    Read the article

  • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) - am I missing something here?

    - by David Semeria
    I was reading about CORS (https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTTP_access_control) and I think the implementation is both simple and effective. However, unless I'm missing something, I think there's a big part missing from the spec. As I understand, it's the foreign site that decides, based on the origin of the request (and optionally including credentials), whether to allow access to its resources. This is fine. But what if malicious code on the page wants to POST a user's sensitive information to a foreign site? The foreign site is obviously going to authenticate the request. Hence, again if I'm not missing something, CORS actually makes it easier to steal sensitive information. I think it would have made much more sense if the original site could also supply an immutable list of servers its page is allowed to access. So the expanded sequence would be: 1) Supply a page with list of acceptable CORS servers (abc.com, xyz.com, etc) 2) Page wants to make an XHR request to abc.com - the browser allows this because it's in the allowed list and authentication proceeds as normal 3) Page wants to make an XHR request to malicious.com - request rejected locally (ie by the browser) because the server is not in the list. I know that malicious code could still use JSONP to do its dirty work, but I would have thought that a complete implementation of CORS would imply the closing of the script tag multi-site loophole. I also checked out the official CORS spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/cors) and could not find any mention of this issue.

    Read the article

  • send data from one table to another page

    - by user91599
    I have this table I want when I click on a link in a table row that do a redirect to another page the data will be sent to the new page that can help me I have not found how to start I'm really stuck code table <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" class="display" id="example"> <thead> <tr> <th>Date</th> <th>provider</th> <th>CI</th> <th>CELL</th> <th>BSC</th> <th>Commentaire</th> <th>nbr</th> <th>Type</th> <th><img src="{{ asset('image/Modify.png') }}" ALIGN="CENTER"/></th> <th><img src="{{ asset('image/Info.png') }}" ALIGN="CENTER"/></th> <th><img src="{{ asset('image/Male.png') }}" ALIGN="CENTER"/></th> <th>type_alertes</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <div class="textbox"> <h2> Information KPI dégradées</h2> <div class="textbox_content" id="kpi_dégrades"> {% for liste in listes %} <tr class="gradeU"> <td>{{ liste.DAT }} </td> <td>{{ liste.PROVIDER}} </td> <td>{{ liste.CI}} </td> <td>{{ liste.CELL}} </td> <td>{{ liste.BSC}}</td> <td>{{ liste.Cmts}}</td> <td >{{ liste.nbr}}</td> <td>{{ liste.TYPE}}</td> <td><a class="edit" href="">Edit</a></td> <td onclick="getInfo('{{ liste.CELL}}')">Information KPI dégradés</td> <td>{{ liste.user_name}}</td> <td>{{ liste.type_alertes}}</td> </tr> {% endfor %} </div> </div> </tbody>

    Read the article

  • Detecting Handlers of a jQuery "Live" Event

    - by Anderson De Andrade
    Using: $('#foo').data('events').click We are able to access an iterative object of click handlers added to the element '#foo' but only when they were added with .bind() Is there a way to get the handlers for an event added with .live()? Is there any other way to know if an element has a click handler assigned?

    Read the article

  • How do to check to see if the user has a Google account.

    - by skrat
    Is there any safe way to detect, on a web page, client side (JS), whether user has an Google/Yahoo/Live/? account? I know about some suspicious ways to do this by styling visited links and then sneaking on computed style attribute, but it's more of a hack, Mozilla and maybe other are planning to crack down on this, as it might be abused. But I need this to allow users more integration with their identity providers, like: Have a Google account? ~ load contacts for sharing from Google Contacts API Have an Yahoo account? ~ load contacts for sharing from Yahoo Contacts API none of the above? show no link I don't want to provide all these options to all visitors, would be nice if I can detect the account, and provide integration only in that case.

    Read the article

  • How to retain focus on an editable html after deleting an element.

    - by Lukasz
    Hello, I have a website with design mode on (aka. content editable = true) with some basic text on it. To that site I hooked up a shortcut so that at any point in the text I can insert an input box that serves me as an autocomplete. For that input however I want it to disappear right after I hit ENTER so that I can continue typing. It is an easy task to just make the input box disappear but I always loose focus from my document. I would greatly appreciate any suggestions on how to make this work?

    Read the article

  • How can I keep a div's scrollbar at the bottom of the div using jQuery?

    - by dannytatom
    I have a div called #output, styled with overflow: scroll;. Using jQuery.ajax, it's being updated every x second. I'd like to have it so that when the scrollbar appears (after the divs filled up), it should continously stay at the bottom of the div instead of the top, like most chat clients do. I'm sure there's a way to do this, I just can't seem to find it. Here's the Sass #output :margin 0 0 10px 0 :padding 10px :height 500px :overflow scroll :background #111111 :border 1px solid #000000 :color #8e8e8e and the Haml is just a simple #output = @output

    Read the article

  • Change ID to text in paragraph with jQuery

    - by Reuben
    I would like to take what text is in my p tag and make that the p tags parent (div) that ID. I would also like to add a _ for any spaces in the p tag. Example: <div class="circle"><p>Apple</p></div> <div class="circle"><p>Banana</p></div> <div class="circle"><p>Carrot Juice</p></div> to <div id="Apple" class="circle"><p>Apple</p></div> <div id="Banana" class="circle"><p>Banana</p></div> <div id="Carrot_Juice" class="circle"><p>Carrot Juice</p></div>

    Read the article

  • How can I wait for the image to load in my new window before printing via child.print()?

    - by libertas
    $("#print").on('click', function () { var child = window.open("image.jpg", "_blank", "location=0,toolbar=0,scrollbars=1,fullscreen=1,menubar=0"); //any way to know/wait for image to load? child.print(); }); Any way for my parent window to know that the child window has completed loading the image prior to calling .print()? If they were trigger happy they would end up printing a blank page. I've tried both: child.attachEvent("onload", function () { child.print(); }); and child.attachEvent("DOMContentLoaded", function () { child.print(); }); //(found this online, apparently it's Firefox only, still didn't work)

    Read the article

  • jQuery: How to remove this code redundancy?

    - by Mark
    clone.find('[id]').each(function() { id = $(this).attr('id'); ind = id.search(/\d+$/); $(this).attr('id', id.substr(0,ind)+id_counter); }); clone.find('[for]').each(function() { id = $(this).attr('for'); ind = id.search(/\d+$/); $(this).attr('for', id.substr(0,ind)+id_counter); }); I know I can find elements that have either the id attribute or the for attribute, but then how do I know which one I need to set?

    Read the article

  • Getting Result of $q's Resolution or Rejection

    - by Kevin Meredith
    I'm looking at a $q example from Mastering Web Application Development with Angular. For this code, how can I retrieve the String result of pizzaOrderFulfillment.resolve(...) or pizzaOrderFulfillment.reject? var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]); myApp.controller("MyCtrl", function ($scope, $q) { var Person = function(name) { this.eat = function(food) { return name + " is eating " + food; }; this.beHungry = function(reason) { return name + " is hungry because" + reason; }; }; // success var pizzaOrderFulfillment = $q.defer(); var pizzaDelivered = pizzaOrderFulfillment.promise; var man = new Person("man"); pizzaDelivered.then(man.eat, man.beHungry); pizzaOrderFulfillment.resolve("chicken"); // TODO: var successResult = "man is eating chicken" });

    Read the article

  • Apache Cordova (Phonegap): is jsop needed for cross-site scripting?

    - by DEX
    I've just started using Apache Cordova. I have an library that makes calls (via ajax) to a soap server. When I run these on my local machine in chrome, I get cross site scripting errors when trying to make calls to the service. When I run the same exact code using the Cordova browser in the iOS emulator, the scripts seem to hit the server fine and the response data is received properly. So my question is how is the Cordova browser able to make these requests without cross-site scripting permissions & JSONP ? One thing I noticed is that when the request is sent from iOS, there is no "Origin" header. Is this allowing the Cordova browser to stealthily circumvent cross-site scripting requirements? Is it possible that the node.js server on the device (I believe this is how Cordova works) is manipulating the headers to allow this? I'd like to avoid enabling cross-site scripting on my site so I think this "feature" is nice, but I'm wondering if it's a security hole as well. Anyone have experience with this?

    Read the article

  • Find calling iframe id

    - by Alec Smart
    Hello, I have a number of iframes calling a function in my main page. Is there a way to find out the ID of the iframe which called the function? There are all part of same domain so that should not be an issue. Thank you for your time.

    Read the article

  • how to show jquery notify bar on submit form using php or zf

    - by user1400
    hi guys in my application on zend framework i use of 'jQuery Notify Bar' plugin for display messages, i'd like to show message when my form submit ,the other page is opened and notify bar be open until the other page is completely load and even some second more but the problem is that notify bar show for short Moment and when the other page begin to load , notify bar is closed, and the delay property is not effect to that $('#myForm').submit(function(){ $.notifyBar({ html: "Thank you, your settings were updated!", **delay: 20000,** animationSpeed: "normal" }); how to show notify bar in the other page too? thanks

    Read the article

  • making ajax request to another server

    - by santhosh
    Hi, I had a ajax sample code from W3Schools, where If i request ajax call to remote server the request getting fails. function loadXMLDoc() { if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById("myDiv").innerHTML=xmlhttp.responseText; } } xmlhttp.open("GET","http://www.google.com",true); xmlhttp.send(); } How to solve this..?

    Read the article

  • jQuery encoding values differently than expected for jQuery.ajax data elements

    - by Adam Tuttle
    I'm using jQuery.ajax() to make a PUT request to a REST web service, but seeing some really strange serialization behavior. (Before you say it: Yes, I know that not all browsers support PUT -- this is just an example implementation for an api/framework, and ultimately will not be called by a browser, but rather by a server-side library that does support the extra http verbs.) Here's the form: <form action="/example/api/artist" method="put" id="update"> First Name: <input type="text" name="firstname" /><br/> Last Name: <input type="text" name="lastname" /><br/> Address: <input type="text" name="address" /><br/> City: <input type="text" name="city" /><br/> State: <input type="text" name="state" /><br/> Postal Code: <input type="text" name="postalcode" /><br/> Email: <input type="text" name="email" /><br/> Phone: <input type="text" name="phone" /><br/> Fax: <input type="text" name="fax" /><br/> Password: <input type="text" name="thepassword" /><br/> <input type="hidden" name="debug" value="true" /> <input type="submit" value="Update Artist" /> <input type="reset" value="Cancel" id="updateCancel" /> </form> And the JS: $("#update").submit(function(e){ e.preventDefault(); var frm = $(this); $.ajax({ url: frm.attr('action'), data:{ firstname: $("#update input[name=firstname]").val(), lastname: $("#update input[name=lastname]").val(), address: $("#update input[name=address]").val(), city: $("#update input[name=city]").val(), state: $("#update input[name=state]").val(), postalcode: $("#update input[name=postalcode]").val(), email: $("#update input[name=email]").val(), phone: $("#update input[name=phone]").val(), fax: $("#update input[name=fax]").val(), thepassword: $("#update input[name=thepassword]").val() }, type: frm.attr('method'), dataType: "json", contentType: "application/json", success: function (data, textStatus, xhr){ console.log(data); reloadData(); }, error: function (xhr, textStatus, err){ console.log(textStatus); console.log(err); } }); }); When using FireBug, I see the request go through as this: firstname=Austin&lastname=Weber&address=25463+Main+Street%2C+Suite+C&city=Berkeley&state=CA&postalcode=94707-4513&email=austin%40life.com&phone=555-513-4318&fax=510-513-4888&thepassword=nopolyes That's not horrible, but ideally I'd rather get %20 instead of + for spaces. I tried wrapping each field value lookup in an escape: firstname: escape($("#update input[name=firstname]").val()) But that makes things worse: firstname=Austin&lastname=Weber&address=25463%2520Main%2520Street%252C%2520Suite%2520C&city=Berkeley&state=CA&postalcode=94707-4513&email=austin%40life.com&phone=555-513-4318&fax=510-513-4888&thepassword=nopolyes In this case, the value is being escaped twice; so first the space is encoded to %20, and then the % sign is escaped to %25 resulting in the %2520 for spaces, and %252C for the comma in the address field. What am I doing wrong here?

    Read the article

  • Check if web form values has changed. Best practice

    - by Andrew Florko
    Hello everybody, I have multi-step form and user can navigate to any page to modify or add information. There is a menu that shows progress and steps user completed. This menu allows to navigate to any step user completed or going to complete. Inspite of big button "Save and Continue" some users click this menu to navigate further. I have to check - if values have changed in a form and ask: "Save changes? Yes/No". What is the best way (with minimum code) you suggest me to check if form values have changed. Thank you in advance!

    Read the article

  • jquery form validation, and submit-on-change

    - by Bee
    I want to make all my settings forms across my site confirm that changes are saved, kinda like facebook does if you make changes in a form and then try to navigate away without saving. So I'm disabling the submit button on the forms only enabling if the values change. I then prompt the user to hit save before they leave the page in the case that they do have changes pending. var form = $('form.edit'); if(form.length > 0) { var orig_str = form.serialize(); $(':submit',form).attr('disabled','disabled'); form.on('change keyup', function(){ if(form.serialize() == orig_str) { setConfirmUnload(false); $(':submit',form).attr('disabled','disabled'); } else { setConfirmUnload(true); $(':submit',form).removeAttr('disabled') } }); $('input[type=submit]').click(function(){ setConfirmUnload(false); }); } function setConfirmUnload(on) { window.onbeforeunload = (on) ? unloadMessage : null; } function unloadMessage() { return 'If you navigate away from this page without saving your changes, they will be lost.'; } One of these forms needs some additional validation which I do using jQuery.validate library. e.g. if i wanted to ensure the user can't double submit the form on accident by double clicking on submit or somesuch (the actual validation in question is for a credit-card form and not this simple): $('form').validate({ submitHandler: function(form) { $(':submit', form).attr('disabled','disabled'); form.submit(); } }); Unfortunately both bits are trying to bind to submit button and they're interfering with each other such that the submit button remains disabled no matter what I do and it is impossible to submit the form at all. Is there some way to chain the validations together or something? Or some other way to avoid re-writing the validation code to repeat the "did you change anything in the form" business?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587  | Next Page >