Search Results

Search found 37654 results on 1507 pages for 'function prototypes'.

Page 598/1507 | < Previous Page | 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605  | Next Page >

  • simple jquery callback works on .net3.5 but nothing fires on .net 2.0?

    - by CliffC
    hi i have the following jquery postback method on the client <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="CallServerWithParameters.aspx.cs" Inherits="CallServerWithParameters" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title></title> <script src="jquery-1.2.6.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script language="javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $("#txtNoOfMales").change(function() { var ticketRequired = this.value; var options = { type: "POST", url: "CallServerWithParameters.aspx/GetAvailableTicketsForMales", data: "{no:'" + ticketRequired + "'}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(response) { if (response.d != "") { alert(response.d); $("#txtNoOfMales").focus(); } } }; //Call the PageMethods $.ajax(options); }); }); </script> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div> No of Male Tickets:<asp:TextBox ID="txtNoOfMales" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> </div> </form> </body> </html> and the following web method on the server side using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Web; using System.Web.UI; using System.Web.UI.WebControls; using System.Web.Services; public partial class CallServerWithParameters : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { } [WebMethod] public static string GetAvailableTicketsForMales(int no) { string result = ""; int NoOfTicketsAvailable = 5; if (no > NoOfTicketsAvailable) { result = "Only " + NoOfTicketsAvailable.ToString() + " Male ticket(s) avaialable. Please eneter a lower number!"; } return result; } } problem is everything works fine on .net 3.5 but if i use the same code on .net 2.0 the webmethod event does not get call at all, anybody have any idea what i did wrong? thanks updated with full source code

    Read the article

  • Regex-expression with danish characters

    - by timkl
    I'm currently trying to wrap my head around regex, I have a validation snippet that tests an input box against a regex-expression: $.validator.addMethod("customerName", function(value, element){ return (/^[a-zA-Z]*$/).test(value); }, "Some text"); That works well, but when I try to add a space and some special danish characters, it doesn't filter the danish characters, only the space. $.validator.addMethod("customerName", function(value, element){ return (/^[a-zA-Z æøåÆØÅ]*$/).test(value); }, "Some text"); Any ideas to what could be wrong?

    Read the article

  • apostrophe issue with ajax post to php

    - by Ahmet vardar
    hi there, i am posting data with jquery ajax to php but if input has ' inside, data wont be posted. I tried encodeURIComponent but wont work. any idea on this ? thanks EDIT: my code var name = $("input#name_add").val(); name = encodeURIComponent(name); $.post("function.php", { name: name }, function(data) { //codes }); $query = "UPDATE `table` SET name = '" . stripslashes($_POST['name']) . "' WHERE ID = '$id'"; $result = mysql_query($query); if ($result){ print "ok"; }

    Read the article

  • Reflection, invoke

    - by Alaa'
    Hi, I have a dll file, and i took an object from it and called the functions inside this dll by the object, like this way: Command testClass = (Command)assembly.CreateInstance(creatObject); testClass.Execute(); anyway, the i used reflection from some reason. so i need to use invoke function & set values for variables, then calling the basic function Execute. Before: i wrote the following: object returnValue = objectType.GetMethod("setValues").Invoke(classObject, arguments); testClass.Execute(); but it wasnt useful for me. i used the following: object returnValue = objectType.GetMethod("setValues").Invoke(classObject, arguments); object returnValue1 = objectType.GetMethod("Execute").Invoke(classObject, null); i just want to ask if this is right, to calling the execute in this way, and by the way it works! Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Idiomatic usage of filter, map, build-list and local functions in Racket/Scheme?

    - by Greenhorn
    I'm working through Exercise 21.2.3 of HtDP on my own and was wondering if this is idiomatic usage of the various functions. This is what I have so far: (define-struct ir (name price)) (define list-of-toys (list (make-ir 'doll 10) (make-ir 'robot 15) (make-ir 'ty 21) (make-ir 'cube 9))) ;; helper function (define (price< p toy) (cond [(< (ir-price toy) p) toy] [else empty])) (define (eliminate-exp ua lot) (cond [(empty? lot) empty] [else (filter ir? (map price< (build-list (length lot) (local ((define (f x) ua)) f)) lot))])) To my novice eyes, that seems pretty ugly because I have to define a local function to get build-list to work, since map requires two lists of equal length. Can this be improved for readability? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • When is a C++ terminate handler the Right Thing(TM)?

    - by Joseph Garvin
    The C++ standard provides the std::set_terminate function which lets you specify what function std::terminate should actually call. std::terminate should only get called in dire circumstances, and sure enough the situations the standard describes for when it's called are dire (e.g. an uncaught exception). When std::terminate does get called the situation seems analagous to being out of memory -- there's not really much you can sensically do. I've read that it can be used to make sure resources are freed -- but for the majority of resources this should be handled automatically by the OS when the process exits (e.g. file handles). Theoretically I can see a case for if say, you needed to send a server a specific message when exiting due to a crash. But the majority of the time the OS handling should be sufficient. When is using a terminate handler the Right Thing(TM)? Update: People interested in what can be done with custom terminate handlers might find this non-portable trick useful.

    Read the article

  • Decode the string encoded through php in javascript

    - by Pankaj Khurana
    Hi, I am working on a facebook page in which i have used ajax & response is returned in json format. I have encoded the string in php. Now i want to decode that string in javascript. foreach($feedbackdetails as $feedbackdetail) { $str.= '<div class="tweet"> <img style="cursor:pointer;" id="imgVoteUp" src="http://myserver/facebook/vote_up.gif" alt="Vote Up" title="Vote Up" onclick="saveVote('.$feedbackdetail[pk_feedbackid].',1)" /> : '.$feedbackdetail[upvotecount].' <img style="cursor:pointer;" id="imgVoteDown" src="http://myserver/facebook/vote_down.gif" alt="Vote Down" title="Vote Down" onclick="saveVote('.$feedbackdetail[pk_feedbackid].',0)" /> : '.$feedbackdetail[downvotecount].' <p class="'.$pclass.'">'.$feedbackdetail[title].' by '.$feedbackdetail[name].'<br>'.$feedbackdetail[description].'</p></div>'; } $str=urlencode($str); echo '{"fbml_test":"'.$str.'"}'; Javascript Function: function saveVote(id,type,class) { contentdiv='div_'+id; processdiv='processdiv_'+id; document.getElementById(processdiv).setInnerXHTML('<span id="caric"><center><img src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/z5R48/hash/ejut8v2y.gif" /></center></span>'); posturl='http://myserver/facebook/vote.php'; if(class==0) { class='firstmessage'; } else { class='message'; } var queryString = "?id="+id+"&type="+type+"&pclass="+class; posturl = posturl +queryString; ajax = new Ajax(); ajax.responseType = Ajax.JSON; ajax.requireLogin = true; ajax.ondone = function(data) { document.getElementById('caric').setStyle('display','none'); //new Dialog().showMessage('Dialog',data); if(data.error) { new Dialog().showMessage('Dialog',data.error); } if(data.fbml_test) { document.getElementById(contentdiv).setInnerFBML(data)); } //div_id.setInnerFBML(data); } ajax.post(posturl); } Right now i am getting encoded string how can i change it? Please help me on this Thanks Pankaj

    Read the article

  • Does copy_from_user modify the user pointer?

    - by Michael
    Does the copy_from_user function, declared in uaccess.h, modify the (void __user *)from pointer? The pointer isn't declared as const in the function declaration, only the contents it points to. The reason I ask is that I want to use copy_from_user twice, with the second copy_from_user copying from the place where the first one finished. I was planning on doing something like this, is it guaranteed to work? //buf is a user pointer that is already defined copy_from_user(my_first_alloced_region, buf, some_size); //do stuff copy_from_user(my_second_alloced_region, buf + some_size, some_other_size); Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • KO 2.3.4 - Accessing validation array from callbacks in models

    - by kenny99
    Hi, Apologies if this is an oversight or sheer stupidity on my part but I can't quite figure out how to access the validation array from a callback in a model (using ORM and KO 2.3.4). I want to be able to add specific error messages to the validation array if a callback returns false. e.g This register method: public function register(array & $array, $save = FALSE) { // Initialise the validation library and setup some rules $array = Validation::factory($array) ->pre_filter('trim') ->add_rules('email', 'required', 'valid::email', array($this, 'email_available')) ->add_rules('confirm_email', 'matches[email]') ->add_rules('password', 'required', 'length[5,42]') ->add_rules('confirm_password', 'matches[password]'); return ORM::validate($array, $save); } Callback: public function email_available($value) { return ! (bool) $this->db ->where('email', $value) ->count_records($this->table_name); } I can obviously access the current model from the callback, but I was wondering what the best way to add custom error from the callback would be?

    Read the article

  • Joomla - Force File Download / CSV Export

    - by lautaro.dragan
    I'm in need of help... this is my first time asking a question in SO, so please be kind :) I'm trying to force-download a file from php, so when the user hits a certain button, he gets a file download. The file is a csv (email, username) of all registered users. I decided to add this button to the admin users screen, as you can see in this screenshot. So I added the following code to the addToolbar function in administrator/components/com_users/views/users/view.html.php: JToolBarHelper::custom('users.export', 'export.png', 'export_f2.png', 'Exportar', false); This button is mapped to the following function in the com_users\controller\users.php controller: public function exportAllUsers() { ob_end_clean(); $app = JFactory::getApplication(); header("Content-type: text/csv"); header("Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ideary_users.csv"); header("Pragma: no-cache"); header("Expires: 0"); echo "email,name\n"; $model = $this->getModel("Users"); $users = $model->getAllUsers(); foreach ($users as $user) { echo $user->email . ", " . ucwords(trim($user->name)) . "\r\n"; } $app->close(); } Now, this is actually working perfectly fine. The issue here is that after I download a file, if I hit any button in the admin that causes a POST, instead of it performing the action it should, it just downloads the file over again! For example: I hit the "Export" button "users.csv" downloads Then, I hit the "search" button "users.csv" downloads... what the hell? I'm guessing that when I hit the export button, a JS gets called and sets a form's action attribute to an URL... and expects a response or something, and then other button's are prevented from re-setting the form's action attribute. I can't think of any real solution for this, but I'd rather avoid hacks if possible. So, what would be the standard, elegant solution that joomla offers in this case?

    Read the article

  • compiler warning at C++ template base class

    - by eike
    I get a compiler warning, that I don't understand in that context, when I compile the "Child.cpp" from the following code. (Don't wonder: I stripped off my class declarations to the bare minuum, so the content will not make much sense, but you will see the problem quicker). I get the warning with VS2003 and VS2008 on the highest warning level. The code AbstractClass.h : #include <iostream> template<typename T> class AbstractClass { public: virtual void Cancel(); // { std::cout << "Abstract Cancel" << std::endl; }; virtual void Process() = 0; }; //outside definition. if I comment out this and take the inline //definition like above (currently commented out), I don't get //a compiler warning template<typename T> void AbstractClass<T>::Cancel() { std::cout << "Abstract Cancel" << std::endl; } Child.h : #include "AbstractClass.h" class Child : public AbstractClass<int> { public: virtual void Process(); }; Child.cpp : #include "Child.h" #include <iostream> void Child::Process() { std::cout << "Process" << std::endl; } The warning The class "Child" is derived from "AbstractClass". In "AbstractClass" there's the public method "AbstractClass::Cancel()". If I define the method outside of the class body (like in the code you see), I get the compiler warning... AbstractClass.h(7) : warning C4505: 'AbstractClass::Cancel' : unreferenced local function has been removed with [T=int] ...when I compile "Child.cpp". I do not understand this, because this is a public function and the compiler can't know if I later reference this method or not. And, in the end, I reference this method, because I call it in main.cpp and despite this compiler warning, this method works if I compile and link all files and execute the program: //main.cpp #include <iostream> #include "Child.h" int main() { Child child; child.Cancel(); //works, despite the warning } If I do define the Cancel() function as inline (you see it as out commented code in AbstractClass.h), then I don't get the compiler warning. Of course my program works, but I want to understand this warning or is this just a compiler mistake? Furthermore, if do not implement AbsctractClass as a template class (just for a test purpose in this case) I also don't get the compiler warning...?

    Read the article

  • JQuery UI Dialog query dialog DOM

    - by Travis
    The following simply loads a jquery-ui dialog from an external html file. $('#showdialog').click(function(e) { var div = $('<div>loading...</div>'); div.dialog({ modal: true, open: function() { div.load('anotherpage.html'); } }); e.preventDefault(); }); After the DOM loads from the external html file, I'd like to interrogate it with JQuery. For example, supposing anothorpage.html had a bunch of anchors on it, I'd like to wire up click handlers for them when it loads into the dialog. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Issue with JSON and jQuery

    - by Jason N. Gaylord
    I'm calling a web service and returning the following data in JSON format: ["OrderNumber":"12345","CustomerId":"555"] In my web service success method, I'm trying to parse both: $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "MyService.asmx/ServiceName", data: "{}", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "json", success: function(msg) { var data = msg.d; var rtn = ""; $.each(data, function(list) { rtn = rtn + this.OrderNumber + ", " + this.CustomerId + "<br/>"; } rtn = rtn + "<br/>" + data; $("#test").html(rtn); } }); but I'm getting a bunch of "undefined, undefined" rows followed by the correct JSON string. Any idea why? I've tried using the eval() method but that didn't help as I got some error message talking about ']' being expected.

    Read the article

  • Animate jquery ui slider handle to specific value

    - by user1159555
    I'm trying to animate a jquery UI handle to a specifiv value. My code is this so far. $("#slider1").slider({ max:350, min:100, animate: 'slow', step:10, animate: "true", value: 0, change: function() { // This setTimeout will allow the slider to animated correctly. setTimeout("$('#slider1').slider('value', 200);", 350); } slide: function(event, ui) { $("#amount").val(ui.value); $(this).find('.ui-slider-handle').html('<div class="sliderControl-label v-labelCurrent">'+ui.value+'</div>'); update(); } }); $('#slider').slider('value', 200); How do I make it so that 1) The handle will go to the specific value on page load and 2) The handle can be freely moved after the page has loaded and the animation has finished. Cheers, Jonah

    Read the article

  • How to hide Amazon webstore default toolbar with Prototype?

    - by melaos
    Hi Guys, after playing around this morning, i've found that there's this default chunk of html code in the amazon webstore which will add a toolbar on top of the page. the html looks like below: <td id="wba_logo_bg"> <table class="logo" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr><td align="left"></td> <td class="wba_account" style="padding: 5px;" align="right" valign="top"> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <form action="#" id="searchForm" method="get" name="searchForm"></form> <tbody><tr><td class="wba_account_link"> <a xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" class="myAccountNav" href="#" onclick="return false;">home</a></td> <td class="myAccountDots"></td> <td class="wba_account_link"><a class="myAccountNav" href="#" onclick="return false;">view cart</a></td> <td class="myAccountDots"></td><td class="wba_account_link"><a class="myAccountNav" href="#" onclick="return false;">my account</a></td> <td class="myAccountDots"></td><td class="wba_account_link"><a class="myAccountNav" href="#" onclick="return false;">order status</a></td> <td><img src="pageEditor_files/1_pixel.gif" hspace="7"></td> <td><input name="keyword" tabindex="1" type="text"></td> <td><img alt="Search" class="wba_search_btn" onclick="return false;" onkeyup="if (13==event.keyCode) searchForm.submit();" src="pageEditor_files/btn_search.gif" style="cursor: pointer;" tabindex="2" title="Search" hspace="3"> </td></tr></tbody> </table> </td></tr></tbody> </table> </td> and thus far i was able to use prototype to find those with the class name of wba_account_link and hide them via the codes below: function hideAmazonToolbar() { $("wba_logo_bg").hide(); }//end function but what i really want to do is preferably to hide the whole tbody instead, but with my limited prototype skills, i don't really know how to do this. can anybody point me to the right resources on how to get this done? thanks! EDIT Went higher up and apparently there's a td with an id, and solve it using prototype hide function! man, i love javascript framework :) thanks :)

    Read the article

  • Confusion regarding laziness

    - by Abhinav Kaushik
    I have a function myLength = foldl (\ x _ -> x + 1) 0 which fails with stack overflow with input around 10^6 elements (myLength [1..1000000] fails). I believe that is due to the thunk build up since when I replace foldl with foldl', it works. So far so good. But now I have another function to reverse a list : myReverse = foldl (\ acc x -> x : acc) [] which uses the lazy version foldl (instead of foldl') When I do myLength . myReverse $ [1.1000000]. This time it works fine. I fail to understand why foldl works for the later case and not for former?

    Read the article

  • jQuery animation callback not working

    - by Tim
    Hey, if anyone could please help me then it would be much appreciated. Basically, I want to navigate to a new page once this animation has complete. Using the code below, the animation works fine but hen the navigation doesn't happen. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions? Many thanks, Tim $("a").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); var driver = $(this).attr('href'); $(".content-center").animate({height: "0px"}, 500, function(){ navigate(driver); }); });

    Read the article

  • How to set Source of s:BitmapFill dinamicaly? (FLASH BUILDER, CODE INSIDE)

    - by Ole Jak
    In Flash Builder (flex 4) I try to use next code to set selected by user (from file system) Image as a repeated background. It worked with mx:Image but I want to use cool repited capabiletis of s:BitmapFill. BTW: Technic I use also does not work with S:BitmapImage. Also FP does not return any errors. What Shall I do with my code to make it work? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009" xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" xmlns:net="flash.net.*" minWidth="955" minHeight="600" > <fx:Script> <![CDATA[ import mx.controls.Alert; import mx.utils.ObjectUtil; private function btn_click(evt:MouseEvent):void { var arr:Array = []; arr.push(new FileFilter("Images", ".gif;*.jpeg;*.jpg;*.png")); fileReference.browse(arr); } private function fileReference_select(evt:Event):void { fileReference.load(); } private function fileReference_complete(evt:Event):void { img.source = fileReference.data; Alert.show(ObjectUtil.toString(fileReference)); } ]]> </fx:Script> <fx:Declarations> <net:FileReference id="fileReference" select="fileReference_select(event);" complete="fileReference_complete(event);" /> </fx:Declarations> <s:Rect id="backgroundRect" left="0" right="0" top="0" bottom="0"> <s:fill> <s:BitmapFill id="img" source="@Embed('1.jpg')" fillMode="repeat" /> </s:fill> </s:Rect> <mx:Button id="btn" label="Browse and preview..." click="btn_click(event);" /> </s:Application> Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • jQuery val not working properly in Chrome

    - by Mircea
    I have a simple jQuery function: $('#selectable1 span').live('mousedown', function() { var ff = $(this).css("font-family"); $("#family").val(ff); }); When a span element is clicked (mousedown) an input (#family) gets its font family value. It works in FireFox but in Chrome it works only for font families composed from only one word. Georgia will work but Times New Roman will now. You can see the code here: http://jsfiddle.net/aLaGa/ or live at http://www.typefolly.com What is wrong with this? Thanx

    Read the article

  • Insert xelements using LINQ Select?

    - by Simon Woods
    I have a source piece of xml into which I want to insert multiple elements which are created dependant upon certain values found in the original xml At present I have a sub which does this for me: <Extension()> Public Sub AddElements(ByVal xml As XElement, ByVal elementList As IEnumerable(Of XElement)) For Each e In elementList xml.Add(e) Next End Sub And this is getting invoked in a routine as follows: Dim myElement = New XElement("NewElements") myElement.AddElements( xml.Descendants("TheElements"). Where(Function(e) e.Attribute("FilterElement") IsNot Nothing). Select(Function(e) New XElement("NewElement", New XAttribute("Text", e.Attribute("FilterElement").Value)))) Is it possible to re-write this using Linq syntax so I don't need to call out to the Sub AddElements but could do it all in-line Many Thx Simon

    Read the article

  • validate dynamically added textbox

    - by Hulk
    In the below code how to validate for null values for only the dynamically added text box i.e,r_score1,r_score2......... <script> function validate() { //How to validate the r_Score.. textfields } $(document).ready(function() { for(var i=0;i< sen.length;i++) { row += '<input type="text" name="r_score'+i+'" id="r_score'+r_count+'" size="8" />'; } $('#details').append(row); }); </script> <div id="details"><input type="text" name="score' id="score" size="8" /></div> <input type="button" value="Save" id="print" onclick="javascript:validate();" />

    Read the article

  • FxCop giving a warning on private constructor CA1823 and CA1053

    - by Luis Sánchez
    I have a class that looks like the following: Public Class Utilities Public Shared Function blah(userCode As String) As String 'doing some stuff End Function End Class I'm running FxCop 10 on it and it says: "Because type 'Utilities' contains only 'static' ( 'Shared' in Visual Basic) members, add a default private constructor to prevent the compiler from adding a default public constructor." Ok, you're right Mr. FxCop, I'll add a private constructor: Private Utilities() Now I'm having: "It appears that field 'Utilities.Utilities' is never used or is only ever assigned to. Use this field or remove it." Any ideas of what should I do to get rid of both warnings?

    Read the article

  • How to create a closure and pass in variable length argument list?

    - by Jian Lin
    We can create a closure p by capturing the arguments in the scope in the following code: var p = function() { }; if (typeof(console) != 'undefined' && console.log) { p = function() { console.log(arguments); }; } but the arguments are passed like an array to console.log, instead of passed one by one as in console.log(arguments[0], arguments[1], arguments[2], ... Is there a way to expand the arguments and pass to console.log like the way above? Note that p = console.log; works well in Firefox and IE 8 but not on Chrome.

    Read the article

  • Why doesn't this (translated) VB.NET code work?

    - by ropstah
    I had a piece of C# code converted, but the translated code isn't valid... Can somebody help out? C# <table> <% Html.Repeater<Hobby>("Hobbies", "row", "row-alt", (hobby, css) => { %> <tr class="<%= css %>"> <td><%= hobby.Title%></td> </tr> <% }); %> </table> VB <% Html.Repeater(of Jrc3.BLL.Product)(Model.ProductCollectionByPrcAutoKey, "row", "row-alt", Function(product, css) Do %> <tr class="<%= css %>"> <td><%= hobby.Title%></td> </tr> <% End Function)%>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605  | Next Page >