Search Results

Search found 5214 results on 209 pages for 'j unit 122'.

Page 6/209 | < Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >

  • TDD vs. Unit testing

    - by Walter
    My company is fairly new to unit testing our code. I've been reading about TDD and unit testing for some time and am convinced of their value. I've attempted to convince our team that TDD is worth the effort of learning and changing our mindsets on how we program but it is a struggle. Which brings me to my question(s). There are many in the TDD community who are very religious about writing the test and then the code (and I'm with them), but for a team that is struggling with TDD does a compromise still bring added benefits? I can probably succeed in getting the team to write unit tests once the code is written (perhaps as a requirement for checking in code) and my assumption is that there is still value in writing those unit tests. What's the best way to bring a struggling team into TDD? And failing that is it still worth writing unit tests even if it is after the code is written? EDIT What I've taken away from this is that it is important for us to start unit testing, somewhere in the coding process. For those in the team who pickup the concept, start to move more towards TDD and testing first. Thanks for everyone's input. FOLLOW UP We recently started a new small project and a small portion of the team used TDD, the rest wrote unit tests after the code. After we wrapped up the coding portion of the project, those writing unit tests after the code were surprised to see the TDD coders already done and with more solid code. It was a good way to win over the skeptics. We still have a lot of growing pains ahead, but the battle of wills appears to be over. Thanks for everyone who offered advice!

    Read the article

  • Unit testing opaque structure based C API

    - by Nicolas Goy
    I have a library I wrote with API based on opaque structures. Using opaque structures has a lot of benefits and I am very happy with it. Now that my API are stable in term of specifications, I'd like to write a complete battery of unit test to ensure a solid base before releasing it. My concern is simple, how do you unit test API based on opaque structures where the main goal is to hide the internal logic? For example, let's take a very simple object, an array with a very simple test: WSArray a = WSArrayCreate(); int foo = 5; WSArrayAppendValue(a, &foo); int *bar = WSArrayGetValueAtIndex(a, 0); if(&foo != bar) printf("Eroneous value returned\n"); else printf("Good value returned\n"); WSRelease(a); Of course, this tests some facts, like the array actually acts as wanted with 1 value, but when I write unit tests, at least in C, I usualy compare the memory footprint of my datastructures with a known state. In my example, I don't know if some internal state of the array is broken. How would you handle that? I'd really like to avoid adding codes in the implementation files only for unit testings, I really emphasis loose coupling of modules, and injecting unit tests into the implementation would seem rather invasive to me. My first thought was to include the implementation file into my unit test, linking my unit test statically to my library. For example: #include <WS/WS.h> #include <WS/Collection/Array.c> static void TestArray(void) { WSArray a = WSArrayCreate(); /* Structure members are available because we included Array.c */ printf("%d\n", a->count); } Is that a good idea? Of course, the unit tests won't benefit from encapsulation, but they are here to ensure it's actually working.

    Read the article

  • what appropriate "Allocation Unit Size" for an exFAT SD card with ReadyBoost

    - by Revolter
    I've brought an 4GB SD card and I'm dedicating it for use by ReadyBoost (on Windows7) Im looking to get the most profit on performance, so i've formatted it with exFAT (as recommended by Microsoft) but I have some doubts to define what best .Allocation Unit Size* I should choose. Since I can't get how ReadyBoost/SD card exactly read/seek the data, can someone tell what make choosing an Allocation Unit Size in favor of another for this scheme ? Apparently, ReadyBoost is allocating all the free space in SD card as one huge file, so a big Allocation Unit Size is advised for fastest reading time. I'm not confusing with ordinary HDD's ?

    Read the article

  • How do you set a custom session when unit testing with wicket?

    - by vagabond
    I'm trying to run some unit tests on a wicket page that only allows access after you've logged in. In my JUnit test I cannot start the page or render it without setting the session. How do you set the session? I'm having problems finding any documentation on how to do this. WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MyApp()); ((MyCustomSession)tester.getWicketSession()).setItem(MyFactory.getItem("abc")); //Fails to start below, no session seems to be set tester.startPage(General.class); tester.assertRenderedPage(General.class);

    Read the article

  • When creating an library published on CodePlex, how "bad" would it be for the unit-test projects to rely on commercial products?

    - by Lasse V. Karlsen
    I have started a project on CodePlex for a WebDAV server implementation for .NET, so that I can host a WebDAV server in my own programs. This is both a learning/research project (WebDAV + server portion) as well as a project I think I can have much fun with, both in terms of making it and using it. However, I see a need to do mocking of types here in order to unit-testing properly. For instance, I will be relying on HttpListener for the web server portion of the WebDAV server, and since this type has no interface, and is sealed, I cannot easily make mocks or stubs out of it. Unless I use something like TypeMock. So if I used TypeMock in the unit-test projects on this library, how bad would this be for potential users? The projects are made in C# 3.5 for .NET 3.5 and 4.0, and the project files was created with Visual Studio 2010 Professional. The actual class libraries you would end up referencing in your software would of course not be encumbered with anything remotely like this, only the unit-test libraries. What's your thoughts on this? As an example, I have in my old code-base, which is private, the ability to just initiate a WebDAV server with just this: var server = new WebDAVServer(); This constructs, and owns, a HttpListener instance internally, and I would like to verify through unit-tests that if I dispose of this server object, the internal listener is disposed of. If, on the other hand, I use the overload where I hand it a listener object, this object should not be disposed of. Short of exposing the internal listener object to the outside world, something I'm a bit loath to do, how can I in a good way ensure that the object was disposed of? With TypeMock I can mock away parts of this object even though it isn't accessed through interfaces. The alternative would be for me to wrap everything in wrapper classes, where I have complete control.

    Read the article

  • Unit testing methods decorated with custom attributes

    - by Joel Cunningham
    I am trying to retrofit unit tests on to some existing code base. Both the class and method I want to unit test is decorated with custom attributes. These attributes are fairly sophisticated and I dont want them to run as part of the unit test. The only solution I have come up with is to compile the attribute out when I want to unit test. I dont really like this solution and would prefer to either replace it with a mocked attribute at runtime or prevent the attribute from running in a more elegant way. How do you unit test code that has class and method attributes that you dont want to run as part of a unit test? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Performance Testing Versus Unit Testing

    - by Mystagogue
    I'm reading Osherove's "The Art of Unit Testing," and though I've not yet seen him say anything about performance testing, two thoughts still cross my mind: Performance tests generally can't be unit tests, because performance tests generally need to run for long periods of time. Performance tests generally can't be unit tests, because performance issues too often manifest at an integration or system level (or at least the logic of a single unit test needed to re-create the performance of the integration environment would be too involved to be a unit test). Particularly for the first reason stated above, I doubt it makes sense for performance tests to be handled by a unit testing framework (such as NUnit). My question is: do my findings / leanings correspond with the thoughts of the community?

    Read the article

  • Unit test class inherited from ContextBoundObject and decorated with ContextAttribute

    - by Joel Cunningham
    I am trying to retrofit unit tests on to some existing code base. Both the class and method I want to unit test is decorated with custom attributes that are inherited from ContextBoundObject and ContextAttribute. I dont want them to run as part of the unit test. The only solution I have come up with is to compile the attribute out when I want to unit test. I dont really like this solution and would prefer to either replace it with a mocked attribute at runtime or prevent the attribute from running in a more elegant way. How do you unit test code that has class and method attributes that inherit from ContextBoundObject and ContextAttribute that you dont want to run as part of a unit test? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How often should we write unit tests?

    - by Midnight Blue
    Hi, I am recently introduced to the test-driven approach to development by my mentor at work, and he encourages me to write an unit-test whenenver "it makes sense." I understand some benefits of having a throughout unit-test suite for both regression testing and refractoring, but I do wonder how often and how throughout we should write unit-test. My mentor/development lead asks me to write a new unit test-case for a newly written control flow in a method that is already being tested by the exsisting test class, and I think it is an overkill. How often do you write your unit tests, and how detailed do you think your unit tests should be? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How can I unit test a class which requires a web service call?

    - by Chris Cooper
    I'm trying to test a class which calls some Hadoop web services. The code is pretty much of the form: method() { ...use Jersey client to create WebResource... ...make request... ...do something with response... } e.g. there is a create directory method, a create folder method etc. Given that the code is dealing with an external web service that I don't have control over, how can I unit test this? I could try and mock the web service client/responses but that breaks the guideline I've seen a lot recently: "Don't mock objects you don't own". I could set up a dummy web service implementation - would that still constitute a "unit test" or would it then be an integration test? Is it just not possible to unit test at this low a level - how would a TDD practitioner go about this?

    Read the article

  • why my unit testing taken more than normal time to run in VS 2010 Premium [on hold]

    - by kombo
    I have only 4 proeject in my solutions. Am trying to run a unit test for one of my class in one of the project. I Create the unit test by: Right clicking on the class choose the create unit test option. I followed the wizard to the end.which resulting the test creation. I just pass the values of the parameter and run the test. but my test keep running. Both surprisingly it runs on other developers pc. NB:My class is connecting to the database and my application is asp.net web form. i know this is not recommended but i want to have my test running now. i have tried alot of samples on the internet but still my problem persist. Could any one tell me the cause of the extreme slowness(more than 30 minutes)

    Read the article

  • Unit Testing-- fundamental goal?

    - by David
    Me and my co-workers had a bit of a disagreement last night about unit testing in our PHP/MySQL application. Half of us argued that when unit testing a function within a class, you should mock everything outside of that class and its parents. The other half of us argued that you SHOULDN'T mock anything that is a direct dependancy of the class either. The specific example was our logging mechanism, which happened through a static Logging class, and we had a number of Logging::log() calls in various locations throughout our application. The first half of us said the Logging mechanism should be faked (mocked) because it would be tested in the Logging unit tests. The second half of us argued that we should include the original Logging class in our unit test so that if we make a change to our logging interface, we'll be able to see if it creates problems in other parts of the application due to failing to update the call interface. So I guess the fundamental question is-- do unit tests serve to test the functionality of a single unit in a closed environment, or show the consequences of changes to a single unit in a larger environment? If it's one of these, how do you accomplish the other?

    Read the article

  • Httpd problem, suspect an attack but not sure

    - by Bob
    On one of my servers when I type netstat -n I get a huge output, something like 400 entries for httpd. The bandwidth on the server isn't high, so I'm confused as to what's causing it. I'm suspecting an attack, but not sure. Intermittently, the web server will stop responding. When this happens all other services such as ping, ftp, work just normally. System load is also normal. The only thing that isn't normal I think is the "netstat -n" output. Can you guys take a look and see if there's something I can do? I have APF installed, but not sure what rules I should put into place to mitigate the problem. Btw, I'm running CentOS 5 Linux with Apache 2. root@linux [/backup/stuff/apf-9.7-1]# netstat -n|grep :80 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.220:48397 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 218.86.49.153:1734 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:48316 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 208.80.193.33:54407 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 65.49.2.180:46768 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 120.0.70.180:9414 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.101:43386 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.92:80 220.181.7.112:51601 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.94:80 220.181.94.215:53097 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.188.236:53203 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:62297 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:64345 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.115.105:36600 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 118.77.25.129:1743 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.220:35107 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:61801 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 66.249.69.155:57641 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1009 120.136.23.56:80 114.249.218.24:17204 CLOSING tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 119.235.237.85:45355 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 217.212.224.182:45195 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.189.10.170:1556 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.102:35701 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 118.77.25.129:1745 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 118.77.25.129:1749 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 118.77.25.129:1748 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.195.76.250:26635 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.111.239:58417 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.218.116.164:53370 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.236:56168 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 120.136.23.93:36947 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1009 120.136.23.56:80 114.249.218.24:16991 CLOSING tcp 0 305 120.136.23.56:80 59.58.149.147:1881 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 61.186.48.148:1405 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.125.66.46:26703 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4814 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 218.86.49.153:1698 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4813 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4810 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.236:60508 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4811 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.125.71:43991 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.125.71:52182 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4806 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.125.71:56024 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4805 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.89.251.167:2133 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:48340 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:63543 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.220:39544 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.125.71:48066 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4822 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.113.253:55817 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.141.124.130:11316 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4820 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4816 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.140:40743 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.125.71:60979 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29255 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 117.36.231.149:4078 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29251 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 117.36.231.149:4079 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29260 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.236:51379 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 114.237.16.26:1363 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29263 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.220:63106 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.101:45795 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.224.115.203:46315 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 66.249.69.5:35081 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 203.209.252.26:51590 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29268 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 216.7.175.100:54555 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.92:80 220.181.7.38:47180 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:64467 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29265 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.92:80 220.181.7.110:46593 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29276 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 117.36.231.149:4080 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 117.36.231.149:4081 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:50215 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 101505 120.136.23.56:80 111.166.41.15:1315 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29274 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4878 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1 120.136.23.93:80 58.33.226.66:4715 FIN_WAIT1 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4877 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1009 120.136.23.56:80 114.249.218.24:17062 CLOSING tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29280 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4874 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 124.115.0.28:59777 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4872 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4870 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:50449 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.84.58.254:4868 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.107:37579 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.114.238:34255 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.105:35530 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.220:43960 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.111.229:41667 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.220:52669 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.111.239:56779 TIME_WAIT tcp 1 16560 120.136.23.56:80 210.13.118.102:43675 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 1009 120.136.23.56:80 114.249.218.24:17084 CLOSING tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.105:33501 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 123.116.230.132:9703 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:49414 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.168.66.48:3360 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.168.66.48:3361 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.168.66.48:3362 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 66.249.68.183:39813 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:51569 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 216.129.119.11:58377 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.111.229:41914 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.213.146.54:33921 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:50287 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 61.150.84.6:2094 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.218.116.166:33262 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.101:38064 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 110.75.167.223:39895 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.99:48991 TIME_WAIT tcp 1 16560 120.136.23.56:80 210.13.118.102:61893 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 61.152.250.144:42832 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.174:37484 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:63403 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 119.119.247.249:62121 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 66.249.69.155:62189 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.80:60303 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 363 120.136.23.56:80 123.89.153.157:39067 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:80 127.0.0.1:49406 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.92:80 66.249.65.226:61423 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.136.173.33:19652 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 2332 120.136.23.56:80 221.180.12.66:29243 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.136.173.33:19653 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5061 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.179.90:51318 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5060 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.235:54333 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5062 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.229:42547 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.125.66.135:39557 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5057 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.127.20.37:17012 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.127.20.37:17013 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 222.190.105.186:4641 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5059 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.127.20.37:17014 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64078 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5058 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.127.20.37:17015 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64079 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.127.20.37:17016 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.113.224:53092 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5065 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5064 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5067 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5066 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 125.46.48.20:58200 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 27544 120.136.23.56:80 124.160.125.8:8189 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.125.66.27:30477 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.102:60019 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64080 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.229:37673 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 26136 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64081 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.127.20.37:17002 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64082 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64083 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64084 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 60.169.49.238:64085 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4084 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4085 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4086 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.235:42269 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 125.238.149.46:56911 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 125.238.149.46:56910 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4081 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.221:34606 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4082 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 125.46.48.20:25451 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4083 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.100:55875 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.100:51522 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.9.9.224:49650 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4088 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4089 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18753 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18752 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18755 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 66.249.69.2:43954 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18754 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.231:48903 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 121.0.29.194:61655 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 125.238.149.46:56915 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 125.238.149.46:56914 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 125.46.48.20:16247 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 125.238.149.46:56913 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.235:59909 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.235:48389 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 125.238.149.46:56912 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 222.190.105.186:4635 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.106:44326 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.170.217.26:1812 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.170.217.26:1810 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.104:36898 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.235:39033 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.231:58229 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.170.217.26:1822 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.170.217.26:1820 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 121.206.183.172:2214 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.221:54341 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 222.170.217.26:1818 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18751 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18750 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 61.177.143.210:4226 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 116.9.9.250:55700 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 39599 120.136.23.93:80 125.107.166.221:3083 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 120.86.215.180:62554 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.100:48442 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34199 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 69227 120.136.23.93:80 125.107.166.221:3084 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.231:53605 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34196 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 120.86.215.180:62556 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34203 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.104:40252 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34202 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18731 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34201 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34200 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.9.9.224:49538 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.57:49229 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 124.224.63.144:18734 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.150.182.221:34204 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.72.156.95:2517 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.229:59728 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 116.20.61.208:50598 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5031 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5030 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.191.255.196:46290 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5037 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5036 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 115.56.48.140:38058 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5039 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 115.56.48.140:38057 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5038 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 125.46.48.20:45862 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5033 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5032 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5034 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.9.9.224:49582 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.221:38777 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.125.66.15:27007 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 67.195.37.98:59848 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5040 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 125.46.48.20:14651 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.221:58495 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.72.156.95:2765 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5053 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 120.86.215.180:62578 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.179.58:36715 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 122.86.41.132:5048 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 61.153.27.172:4889 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.72.156.95:1995 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.9.9.224:49501 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 12270 120.136.23.56:80 119.12.4.49:49551 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 6988 120.136.23.56:80 119.12.4.49:49550 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 66.249.67.106:60516 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.179.76:56301 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.178.41:32907 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 61.153.27.172:24811 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.155:35617 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.229:50081 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 3650 120.136.23.56:80 119.12.4.49:49555 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 116.9.9.250:55632 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 4590 120.136.23.56:80 119.12.4.49:49554 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 823 120.136.23.56:80 119.12.4.49:49553 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 778 120.136.23.56:80 119.12.4.49:49552 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 31944 120.136.23.93:80 222.67.49.170:52229 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 219.219.127.2:44661 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.102:38602 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 61.177.143.210:4208 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 117.23.111.2:3297 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.72.156.95:2079 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.92:80 220.181.7.49:44133 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.80:80 125.46.48.20:38627 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 660 120.136.23.56:80 113.16.37.24:62908 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.231:62850 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.235:33423 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 216.129.119.40:53331 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 116.248.65.32:2580 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 61.177.143.210:4199 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 125.107.166.221:3052 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 216.7.175.100:36933 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1 120.136.23.56:80 183.35.149.94:2414 FIN_WAIT1 tcp 0 26963 120.136.23.56:80 124.160.125.8:8274 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 61.153.27.172:16350 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.229:64907 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4116 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.102:32937 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 218.59.137.178:52731 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 123.125.66.53:31474 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 8950 120.136.23.56:80 221.194.136.245:21574 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 216.7.175.100:36922 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 216.7.175.100:36923 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 221.130.177.106:41386 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.221:62681 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 111.72.156.95:1639 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4103 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.231:44007 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 61.153.27.172:15026 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 202.160.180.125:59521 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 660 120.136.23.56:80 113.16.37.24:62921 FIN_WAIT1 tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 220.181.94.229:54767 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4148 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.93:80 202.104.103.210:2423 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.92.53:4149 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 120.136.23.56:80 219.131.

    Read the article

  • Permission denied on /dev/xvdf despite sudo?

    - by Sid
    I'm trying to get a stream off port 9999 and write to /dev/xvdf. I'm using Amazon EC2 with the Ubuntu 11.10 server image. By default I log in as 'ubuntu' which has sudo privileges. However, when I run the following netcat command, I get this error ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ ls -al /dev/xv* brw-rw---- 1 root disk 202, 1 2011-11-30 22:22 /dev/xvda1 brw-rw---- 1 root disk 202, 80 2011-11-30 22:27 /dev/xvdf ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ sudo netcat -p 9999 -l > /dev/xvdf bash: /dev/xvdf: Permission denied ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ Any idea why I get the permission denied error and how I can work around it? Update: Something mysterious is running in the background that resets the permissions? Check the snippet below and the permission flags seem to automatically reset when I try using /dev/xvdf !?! ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ sudo chmod 777 /dev/xvdf ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ ls -al /dev/xvdf brwxrwxrwx 1 root disk 202, 80 2011-11-30 22:43 /dev/xvdf ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ sudo nc -p 9999 -l > /dev/xvdf This is nc from the netcat-openbsd package. An alternative nc is available in the netcat-traditional package. usage: nc [-46DdhklnrStUuvzC] [-i interval] [-P proxy_username] [-p source_port] [-s source_ip_address] [-T ToS] [-w timeout] [-X proxy_protocol] [-x proxy_address[:port]] [hostname] [port[s]] ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ ls -al /dev/xvdf brw-rw---- 1 root disk 202, 80 2011-11-30 22:43 /dev/xvdf ubuntu@ip-10-252-35-122:~$ I'm using stock Ubuntu Amazon EC2 images from http://alestic.com/ (links to images at the top)

    Read the article

  • Routing using Linux with 2 NIC cards

    - by Kevin Parker
    Configured Clear OS to be in Gateway mode on a machine with two NIC cards. eth0:192.168.2.0/24 with ip 192.168.2.27 which is connected to a modem and thus have internet connectivity. eth1:192.168.122.0/24 with ip 192.168.122.10 which is connected to other machines in LAN through switch. LAN machines with network 192.168.122.0 is not getting internet.How can they get internet Through Clear OS gateway.I have enabled packet forwarding in clear os using "ip_forward=1" What am i missing?.Can you please help me in this. Following are the static routing i have added: on LAN machine1 with ip address 192.168.122.11 ip route add 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.122.10 dev eth0 ip route show 192.168.2.0/24 via 192.168.122.10 dev eth0 192.168.122.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.11 But still 192.168.2.0/24 network is not reachable.Where can be the problem??

    Read the article

  • Unit testing in python?

    - by yossi.ittach
    Hey - I'm new to python , and I'm having a hard time grasping the concept of Unit testing in python. I'm coming from Java - so unit testing makes sense because - well , there you actually have a unit - A Class. But a Python class is not necessarily the same as a Java class , and the way I use Python - as a scripting language - is more functional then OOP - So what do you "unit test" in Python ? A flow? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Unit testing an iPhone static library with XCode 3

    - by teabot
    I am writing a number of static libraries for the iPhone and wish also to have suites of unit tests. XCode 3 provides templates for both static libraries and unit tests but I am wondering how they should fit together in a static library project? In my static library project I have created a target for unit testing but expect to also create an executable to kick off the unit tests than run against the classes in the static library. What is the procedure for doing this?

    Read the article

  • Are unit tests also used to find bugs?

    - by Draco
    I was reading the following article and the author made it quite clear that unit tests are NOT used to find bugs. I would like to know what your thoughts are on this. I do know that unit tests makes the design of your application much more robust but isn't it the fact that finding bugs through unit tests that make the application robust, besides its other advantages? http://blog.stevensanderson.com/2009/08/24/writing-great-unit-tests-best-and-worst-practises/

    Read the article

  • How to unit test business rules?

    - by Robert Lamb
    I need a unit test to make sure I am accumulating vacation hours properly. But vacation hours accumulate according to a business rule, if the rule changes, then the unit test breaks. Is this acceptable? Should I expose the rule through a method and then call that method from both my code and my test to ensure that the unit test isn't so fragile? My question is: What is the right way to unit test business rules that may change?

    Read the article

  • How do you unit test your T-SQL

    - by AlexKuznetsov
    How do you unit test your T-SQL? Which libraries/tools do you use? What percentage of your code is covered by unit tests and how do you measure it? Do you think the time and effort which you invested in your unit testing harness has paid off or not? If you do not use unit testing, can you explain why not?

    Read the article

  • Is Debug.Assert obsolete if you write unit tests?

    - by Justin Pihony
    Just like the question asks, is there a need to add Debug.Assert into your code if you are writing unit tests (which has its own assertions)? I could see that this might make the code more obvious without having to go into the tests, however it just seems that you might end up with duplicated asserts. It seems to me that Debug.Assert was helpful before unit-testing became more prevalent, but is now unnecessary. Or, am I not thinking of some use case?

    Read the article

  • Should library classes be wrapped before using them in unit testing?

    - by Songo
    I'm doing unit testing and in one of my classes I need to send a mail from one of the methods, so using constructor injection I inject an instance of Zend_Mail class which is in Zend framework. Example: class Logger{ private $mailer; function __construct(Zend_Mail $mail){ $this->mail=$mail; } function toBeTestedFunction(){ //Some code $this->mail->setTo('some value'); $this->mail->setSubject('some value'); $this->mail->setBody('some value'); $this->mail->send(); //Some } } However, Unit testing demands that I test one component at a time, so I need to mock the Zend_Mail class. In addition I'm violating the Dependency Inversion principle as my Logger class now depends on concretion not abstraction. Does that mean that I can never use a library class directly and must always wrap it in a class of my own? Example: interface Mailer{ public function setTo($to); public function setSubject($subject); public function setBody($body); public function send(); } class MyMailer implements Mailer{ private $mailer; function __construct(){ $this->mail=new Zend_Mail; //The class isn't injected this time } function setTo($to){ $this->mailer->setTo($to); } //implement the rest of the interface functions similarly } And now my Logger class can be happy :D class Logger{ private $mailer; function __construct(Mailer $mail){ $this->mail=$mail; } //rest of the code unchanged } Questions: Although I solved the mocking problem by introducing an interface, I have created a totally new class Mailer that now needs to be unit tested although it only wraps Zend_Mail which is already unit tested by the Zend team. Is there a better approach to all this? Zend_Mail's send() function could actually have a Zend_Transport object when called (i.e. public function send($transport = null)). Does this make the idea of a wrapper class more appealing? The code is in PHP, but answers doesn't have to be. This is more of a design issue than a language specific feature

    Read the article

  • What's a unit test? [closed]

    - by Tyler
    Possible Duplicates: What is unit testing and how do you do it? What is unit testing? I recognize that to 95% of you, this is a very WTF question. So. What's a unit test? I understand that essentially you're attempting to isolate atomic functionality but how do you test for that? When is it necessary? When is it ridiculous? Can you give an example? (Preferably in C? I mostly hear about it from Java devs on this site so maybe this is specific to Object Oriented languages? I really don't know.) I know many programmers swear by unit testing religiously. What's it all about? EDIT: Also, what's the ratio of time you typically spend writing unit tests to time spent writing new code?

    Read the article

  • Is mocking for unit testing appropriate in this scenario?

    - by Vinoth Kumar
    I have written around 20 methods in Java and all of them call some web services. None of these web services are available yet. To carry on with the server side coding, I hard-coded the results that the web-service is expected to give. Can we unit test these methods? As far as I know, unit testing is mocking the input values and see how the program responds. Are mocking both input and ouput values meaningful? Edit : The answers here suggest I should be writing unit test cases. Now, how can I write it without modifying the existing code ? Consider the following sample code (hypothetical code) : public int getAge() { Service s = locate("ageservice"); // line 1 int age = s.execute(empId); // line 2 return age; // line 3 } Now How do we mock the output ? Right now , I am commenting out 'line 1' and replacing line 2 with int age= 50. Is this right ? Can anyone point me to the right way of doing it ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >