Search Results

Search found 1308 results on 53 pages for 'reviews'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 6/53 | < Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >

  • On a BPM Mission with Process Accelerators. Part 1: BPM as an ATV

    - by Cesare Rotundo
    Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Part 1: BPM as an ATV It’s always exciting to talk to customers that are in the middle of a BPM transformational journey. Their thirst for new processes to improve with BPM makes them explorers in a landscape of opportunities. They have discovered that with BPM the can “go places” they couldn’t reach before. In a way, learning how to generate value with BPM is like adopting a new mean of transportation. Apps are like regular cars: very efficient, but to be used on paved roads: the road/process has been traced, and there are fixed paths to follow to get from “opportunity to quote” or from “quote to cash”. Getting off the road is risky, and laying down new asphalt is slow and expensive. Custom development is like running: you can go virtually anywhere, following any path you like, yet it’s slow, and a lot of sweat. BPM allows you to go “off the beaten path” laid out by packaged apps, yet make fast progress compared to custom development. BPM is therefore more like an All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV): less efficient than a car, but much faster than running, with a powerful enough engine that can get you places. The similarities between BPM and ATVs don’t stop here: you must learn to ride it even if you already know how to drive a car; you can reach places but figuring out the path to your destination is harder. Ultimately, with BPM as with an ATV, you reach places that you thought you could never reach, and you discover new destinations that provide great benefit to you … and that you didn’t even know existed! That’s where the sense of accomplishment that we heard from our BPM customers comes from, as well as the desire to share their experience, or even, as in the case of a County, the willingness to contribute their BPM solutions to help other agencies that face the same challenges. The question we wanted to answer is how can we teach organizations to drive ATV/BPM, thus leading them to deeper success with BPM, while increasing their awareness of the potential for reaching new targets, and finally equip them with the right tools. Like with ATVs, getting from point A to point B is more of a work of art than cruising on the highway by car. There is a lot we can do: after all many sought after destinations are common: someone else has been on the same path before. If only you could learn from their experience …

    Read the article

  • Quantis Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG) - any reviews?

    - by Tim Post
    I am thinking about getting one of these (PCI) to set up an internal entropy pool similar to this service who incidentally brought us fun captcha challenges. Prior to lightening my wallet, I'm hoping to gather feedback from people who may be using this device. As there is no possible 'correct' answer, I am making this CW and tagging it as subjective. I'm undertaking a project to help write Monte Carlo simulations for a non profit that distributes mosquito nets in Malaria stricken areas. The idea is to model areas to determine the best place to distribute mosquito nets. During development, I expect to consume gigs if not more of the RNG output. We really need our own source. Is this device reliable? Does it have to be re-started often? Is its bandwidth really as advertised? It passes all tests, as far as randomness goes (i.e. NIST/DIEHARD). What I don't want is something in deadlock due to some ioctl in disk sleep that does nothing but radiate heat. This is not a spamvertisement, I'm helping out of pocket and I really, really want to know if such a large purchase will bear fruit. I can't afford to build a HRNG based on radioactive decay, this looks like the next best thing. Any comments are appreciated. I will earn zero rep for this, please do not vote to close. This is no different than questions regarding the utilization of some branded GPU for some odd purpose. Answers pointing to other solutions will be gladly accepted, I'm not married to this idea.

    Read the article

  • How to get reviews success message in magento?

    - by Raul
    How to get revies success message in magento? Array ( [core] = Array ( [_session_validator_data] = Array ( [remote_addr] = 192.168.151.102 [http_via] = [http_x_forwarded_for] = [http_user_agent] = Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4 ) [session_hosts] => Array ( [technova2] => 1 ) [messages] => Mage_Core_Model_Message_Collection Object ( [_messages:protected] => Array ( ) [_lastAddedMessage:protected] => Mage_Core_Model_Message_Success Object ( [_type:protected] => success [_code:protected] => Your review has been accepted for moderation [_class:protected] => [_method:protected] => [_identifier:protected] => [_isSticky:protected] => ) ) [just_voted_poll] => [visitor_data] => Array ( [] => [server_addr] => -1062692990 [remote_addr] => -1062693018 [http_secure] => [http_host] => technova2 [http_user_agent] => Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4 [http_accept_language] => en-US,en;q=0.8 [http_accept_charset] => ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 [request_uri] => /~rahuls/sextoys/index.php/review/product/list/id/169/ [session_id] => 21bq2vtkup5m1gtghknlu1tit42c6dup [http_referer] => http://technova2/~rahuls/sextoys/index.php/review/product/list/id/169/ [first_visit_at] => 2010-06-16 05:49:56 [is_new_visitor] => [last_visit_at] => 2010-06-16 06:00:00 [visitor_id] => 935 [last_url_id] => 23558 ) [last_url] => http://technova2/~rahuls/sextoys/index.php/review/product/list/id/169/ ) [_cookie_revalidate] => 1276669711 [customer_base] => Array ( [_session_validator_data] => Array ( [remote_addr] => 192.168.151.102 [http_via] => [http_x_forwarded_for] => [http_user_agent] => Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4 ) [session_hosts] => Array ( [technova2] => 1 ) [id] => [messages] => Mage_Core_Model_Message_Collection Object ( [_messages:protected] => Array ( ) [_lastAddedMessage:protected] => ) ) [checkout] => Array ( [_session_validator_data] => Array ( [remote_addr] => 192.168.151.102 [http_via] => [http_x_forwarded_for] => [http_user_agent] => Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4 ) [session_hosts] => Array ( [technova2] => 1 ) ) [review] => Array ( [_session_validator_data] => Array ( [remote_addr] => 192.168.151.102 [http_via] => [http_x_forwarded_for] => [http_user_agent] => Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4 ) [session_hosts] => Array ( [technova2] => 1 ) [messages] => Mage_Core_Model_Message_Collection Object ( [_messages:protected] => Array ( ) [_lastAddedMessage:protected] => ) ) [store_default] => Array ( [_session_validator_data] => Array ( [remote_addr] => 192.168.151.102 [http_via] => [http_x_forwarded_for] => [http_user_agent] => Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4 ) [session_hosts] => Array ( [technova2] => 1 ) ) ) After posting the review i want to display the message: Your review has been accepted for moderation. which appears in the session array. but how to fetch it :(. please help. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Code reviews for larger MVC.NET team using TFS

    - by Parrots
    I'm trying to find a good code review workflow for my team. Most questions similar to this on SO revolve around using shelved changes for the review, however I'm curious about how this works for people with larger teams. We usually have 2-3 people working a story (UI person, Domain/Repository person, sometimes DB person). I've recommended the shelf idea but we're all concerned about how to manage that with multiple people working the same feature. How could you share a shelf between multiple programmers at that point? We worry it would be clunky and we might easily have unintended consequences moving to this workflow. Of course moving to shelfs for each feature avoids having 10 or so checkins per feature (as developers need to share code) making seeing the diffs at code review time painful. Has anyone else been able to successfully deal with this? Are there any tools out there people have found useful aside from shelfs in TFS (preferably open-source)?

    Read the article

  • gametutorials.com questions and reviews DirectX tutorials

    - by numerical25
    Just curious to know if anyone has ever used gametutorials.com products for learning directX. I was debating on whether I should buy it or not. I read online that most of his tutorials were written in the source code. It's nice to heavily comment your code but if most of the tutorial is in his code then I don't think that is necessarily the best way to do a tutorial. But anyhow, I am not sure about that, I am just checking for clarification. and checking to see if it would be a good investment.

    Read the article

  • Code reviews for larger ASP.NET MVC team using TFS

    - by Parrots
    I'm trying to find a good code review workflow for my team. Most questions similar to this on SO revolve around using shelved changes for the review, however I'm curious about how this works for people with larger teams. We usually have 2-3 people working a story (UI person, Domain/Repository person, sometimes DB person). I've recommended the shelf idea but we're all concerned about how to manage that with multiple people working the same feature. How could you share a shelf between multiple programmers at that point? We worry it would be clunky and we might easily have unintended consequences moving to this workflow. Of course moving to shelfs for each feature avoids having 10 or so checkins per feature (as developers need to share code) making seeing the diffs at code review time painful. Has anyone else been able to successfully deal with this? Are there any tools out there people have found useful aside from shelfs in TFS (preferably open-source)?

    Read the article

  • How to remove MySQL completely with config and library files on ubuntu 12.04 gnome 3.0

    - by codeartist
    I tried everything till now: sudo apt-get remove mysql-server mysql-client mysql-common sudo apt-get purge mysql-server mysql-client mysql-common sudo apt-get autoremove and even more commands... But whenever I am trying to locate mysql. I get a no. of files related to mysql command: shell>> locate mysql Output: /etc/mysql /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mysql /etc/apparmor.d/cache/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/cache/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/bash_completion.d/mysqladmin /etc/init/mysql.conf /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.paranoid/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.workstation/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logrotate.d/mysql-server /etc/mysql/conf.d /etc/mysql/debian-start /etc/mysql/debian.cnf /etc/mysql/conf.d/mysqld_safe_syslog.cnf /home/pkr/.mysql_history /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,libqt4-sql-mysql,,349051c3a57da571aa832adb39177aff /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,mysql-client,,cbf77a486cdc80547317981a33144427 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,mysql-client,,de8220dee4d957a9502caa79e8d2fdda /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,any,any,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,17fb2e657321dc51526ee8fe9928da30 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,any,any,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,a4c1b6e8200f36ab5745c6f81f14da0a /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,oneiric,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,c54295fb82b8183350cd34f22c3547ef /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,oneiric,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,fcf201c1abff3f774af89173a84de2cc /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,precise,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,0cd86648584efeccfb16119012f89540 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,precise,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,eb84724e9da7851ff8862a227d8bac59 /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err.old /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.CSM /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.CSV /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.CSM /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.CSV /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.frm /usr/bin/mysql /usr/bin/mysql_install_db /usr/bin/mysql_upgrade /usr/bin/mysqlcheck /usr/sbin/mysqld /usr/share/mysql /usr/share/app-install/desktop/gmysqlcc:gmysqlcc.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-client.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-navigator:mysql-navigator.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-server.desktop /usr/share/app-install/icons/gmysqlcc-32.png /usr/share/app-install/icons/mysql-navigator.png /usr/share/doc/mysql-client-core-5.5 /usr/share/doc/mysql-server-core-5.5 /usr/share/kde4/apps/katepart/syntax/sql-mysql.xml /usr/share/man/man1/mysql.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_install_db.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_upgrade.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlcheck.1.gz /usr/share/man/man8/mysqld.8.gz /var/cache/apt/archives/akonadi-backend-mysql_1.7.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmysqlclient-dev_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmysqlclient18_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libqt4-sql-mysql_4%3a4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client-core-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-common_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-core-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-client-core-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-client-core-5.5.md5sums /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.5.postrm /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-core-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-core-5.5.md5sums /var/log/mysql /var/log/mysql.err /var/log/mysql.log /var/log/mysql.log.1.gz /var/log/mysql.log.2.gz /var/log/mysql.log.3.gz /var/log/mysql.log.4.gz /var/log/mysql.log.5.gz /var/log/mysql.log.6.gz /var/log/mysql.log.7.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.1.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.2.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.3.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.4.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.5.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.6.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.7.gz What should I do now? Please help me out in this :( I was trying to find out if there is any way I can remove mysql related every file and then reinstall mysql. I need it for Qt connectivity. I don't understand what to do! Please help :(

    Read the article

  • How to remove MySQL completely with config and library files?

    - by codeartist
    I tried everything till now: sudo apt-get remove mysql-server mysql-client mysql-common sudo apt-get purge mysql-server mysql-client mysql-common sudo apt-get autoremove and even more commands... But whenever I am trying to locate mysql. I get a no. of files related to mysql command: shell>> locate mysql Output: /etc/mysql /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mysql /etc/apparmor.d/cache/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/cache/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/bash_completion.d/mysqladmin /etc/init/mysql.conf /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.paranoid/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.workstation/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logrotate.d/mysql-server /etc/mysql/conf.d /etc/mysql/debian-start /etc/mysql/debian.cnf /etc/mysql/conf.d/mysqld_safe_syslog.cnf /home/pkr/.mysql_history /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,libqt4-sql-mysql,,349051c3a57da571aa832adb39177aff /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,mysql-client,,cbf77a486cdc80547317981a33144427 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,mysql-client,,de8220dee4d957a9502caa79e8d2fdda /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,any,any,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,17fb2e657321dc51526ee8fe9928da30 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,any,any,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,a4c1b6e8200f36ab5745c6f81f14da0a /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,oneiric,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,c54295fb82b8183350cd34f22c3547ef /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,oneiric,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,fcf201c1abff3f774af89173a84de2cc /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,precise,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,0cd86648584efeccfb16119012f89540 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,precise,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,eb84724e9da7851ff8862a227d8bac59 /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err.old /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.CSM /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.CSV /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.CSM /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.CSV /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.frm /usr/bin/mysql /usr/bin/mysql_install_db /usr/bin/mysql_upgrade /usr/bin/mysqlcheck /usr/sbin/mysqld /usr/share/mysql /usr/share/app-install/desktop/gmysqlcc:gmysqlcc.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-client.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-navigator:mysql-navigator.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-server.desktop /usr/share/app-install/icons/gmysqlcc-32.png /usr/share/app-install/icons/mysql-navigator.png /usr/share/doc/mysql-client-core-5.5 /usr/share/doc/mysql-server-core-5.5 /usr/share/kde4/apps/katepart/syntax/sql-mysql.xml /usr/share/man/man1/mysql.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_install_db.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_upgrade.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlcheck.1.gz /usr/share/man/man8/mysqld.8.gz /var/cache/apt/archives/akonadi-backend-mysql_1.7.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmysqlclient-dev_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmysqlclient18_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libqt4-sql-mysql_4%3a4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client-core-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-common_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-core-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-client-core-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-client-core-5.5.md5sums /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.5.postrm /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-core-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-core-5.5.md5sums /var/log/mysql /var/log/mysql.err /var/log/mysql.log /var/log/mysql.log.1.gz /var/log/mysql.log.2.gz /var/log/mysql.log.3.gz /var/log/mysql.log.4.gz /var/log/mysql.log.5.gz /var/log/mysql.log.6.gz /var/log/mysql.log.7.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.1.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.2.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.3.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.4.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.5.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.6.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.7.gz What should I do now? Please help me out in this :( I was trying to find out if there is any way I can remove mysql related every file and then reinstall mysql. I need it for Qt connectivity. I don't understand what to do! Please help :(

    Read the article

  • Is there any way to get faster app reviews?

    - by David
    I am trying to build a business around an iPhone app. The app will be our main sales channel, and being able to adapt the sales channel faster than the 9-10 days delay cause by the app review times is crucial. Therefore, I was wondering whether there is anything I can do to improve the speed of reviews. I am thinking that the publishers of Angry Birds, surely would not have to wait in line for reviews on the same terms as some obscure free app. So what can I do? Some things I am considering: Would Apple prioritize apps that they earn money on? Could I in some way pay Apple directly? I already know of the possibility of requesting an expedite review, but it seems like one can get punished for supplying a non-technical reason.

    Read the article

  • VS 2012 Code Review &ndash; Before Check In OR After Check In?

    - by Tarun Arora
    “Is Code Review Important and Effective?” There is a consensus across the industry that code review is an effective and practical way to collar code inconsistency and possible defects early in the software development life cycle. Among others some of the advantages of code reviews are, Bugs are found faster Forces developers to write readable code (code that can be read without explanation or introduction!) Optimization methods/tricks/productive programs spread faster Programmers as specialists "evolve" faster It's fun “Code review is systematic examination (often known as peer review) of computer source code. It is intended to find and fix mistakes overlooked in the initial development phase, improving both the overall quality of software and the developers' skills. Reviews are done in various forms such as pair programming, informal walkthroughs, and formal inspections.” Wikipedia No where does the definition mention whether its better to review code before the code has been committed to version control or after the commit has been performed. No matter which side you favour, Visual Studio 2012 allows you to request for a code review both before check in and also request for a review after check in. Let’s weigh the pros and cons of the approaches independently. Code Review Before Check In or Code Review After Check In? Approach 1 – Code Review before Check in Developer completes the code and feels the code quality is appropriate for check in to TFS. The developer raises a code review request to have a second pair of eyes validate if the code abides to the recommended best practices, will not result in any defects due to common coding mistakes and whether any optimizations can be made to improve the code quality.                                             Image 1 – code review before check in Pros Everything that gets committed to source control is reviewed. Minimizes the chances of smelly code making its way into the code base. Decreases the cost of fixing bugs, remember, the earlier you find them, the lesser the pain in fixing them. Cons Development Code Freeze – Since the changes aren’t in the source control yet. Further development can only be done off-line. The changes have not been through a CI build, hard to say whether the code abides to all build quality standards. Inconsistent! Cumbersome to track the actual code review process.  Not every change to the code base is worth reviewing, a lot of effort is invested for very little gain. Approach 2 – Code Review after Check in Developer checks in, random code reviews are performed on the checked in code.                                                      Image 2 – Code review after check in Pros The code has already passed the CI build and run through any code analysis plug ins you may have running on the build server. Instruct the developer to ensure ZERO fx cop, style cop and static code analysis before check in. Code is cleaner and smell free even before the code review. No Offline development, developers can continue to develop against the source control. Cons Bad code can easily make its way into the code base. Since the review take place much later in the cycle, the cost of fixing issues can prove to be much higher. Approach 3 – Hybrid Approach The community advocates a more hybrid approach, a blend of tooling and human accountability quotient.                                                               Image 3 – Hybrid Approach 1. Code review high impact check ins. It is not possible to review everything, by setting up code review check in policies you can end up slowing your team. More over, the code that you are reviewing before check in hasn't even been through a green CI build either. 2. Tooling. Let the tooling work for you. By running static analysis, fx cop, style cop and other plug ins on the build agent, you can identify the real issues that in my opinion can't possibly be identified using human reviews. Configure the tooling to report back top 10 issues every day. Mandate the manual code review of individuals who keep making it to this list of shame more often. 3. During Merge. I would prefer eliminating some of the other code issues during merge from Main branch to the release branch. In a scrum project this is still easier because cheery picking the merges is a possibility and the size of code being reviewed is still limited. Let the tooling work for you, if some one breaks the CI build often, put them on a gated check in build course until you see improvement. If some one appears on the top 10 list of shame generated via the build then ensure that all their code is reviewed till you see improvement. At the end of the day, the goal is to ensure that the code being delivered is top quality. By enforcing a code review before any check in, you force the developer to work offline or stay put till the review is complete. What do the experts say? So I asked a few expects what they thought of “Code Review quality gate before Checking in code?" Terje Sandstrom | Microsoft ALM MVP You mean a review quality gate BEFORE checking in code????? That would mean a lot of code staying either local or in shelvesets, and not even been through a CI build, and a green CI build being the main criteria for going further, f.e. to the review state. I would not like code laying around with no checkin’s. Having a requirement that code is checked in small pieces, 4-8 hours work max, and AT LEAST daily checkins, a manual code review comes second down the lane. I would expect review quality gates to happen before merging back to main, or before merging to release.  But that would all be on checked-in code.  Branching is absolutely one way to ease the pain.   Another way we are using is automatic quality builds, running metrics, coverage, static code analysis.  Unfortunately it takes some time, would be great to be on CI’s – but…., so it’s done scheduled every night. Based on this we get, among other stuff,  top 10 lists of suspicious code, which is then subjected to reviews.  If a person seems to be very popular on these top 10 lists, we subject every check in from that person to a review for a period. That normally helps.   None of the clients I have can afford to have every checkin reviewed, so we need to find ways around it. I don’t disagree with the nicety of having all the code reviewed, but I find it hard to find those resources in today’s enterprises. David V. Corbin | Visual Studio ALM Ranger I tend to agree with both sides. I hate having code that is not checked in, but at the same time hate having “bad” code in the repository. I have found that branching is one approach to solving this dilemma. Code is checked into the private/feature branch before the review, but is not merged over to the “official” branch until after the review. I advocate both, depending on circumstance (especially team dynamics)   - The “pre-checkin” is usually for elements that may impact the project as a whole. Think of it as another “gate” along with passing unit tests. - The “post-checkin” may very well not be at the changeset level, but correlates to a review at the “user story” level.   Again, this depends on team dynamics in play…. Robert MacLean | Microsoft ALM MVP I do not think there is no right answer for the industry as a whole. In short the question is why do you do reviews? Your question implies risk mitigation, so in low risk areas you can get away with it after check in while in high risk you need to do it before check in. An example is those new to a team or juniors need it much earlier (maybe that is before checkin, maybe that is soon after) than seniors who have shipped twenty sprints on the team. Abhimanyu Singhal | Visual Studio ALM Ranger Depends on per scenario basis. We recommend post check-in reviews when: 1. We don't want to block other checks and processes on manual code reviews. Manual reviews take time, and some pieces may not require manual reviews at all. 2. We need to trace all changes and track history. 3. We have a code promotion strategy/process in place. For risk mitigation, post checkin code can be promoted to Accepted branches. Or can be rejected. Pre Checkin Reviews are used when 1. There is a high risk factor associated 2. Reviewers are generally (most of times) have immediate availability. 3. Team does not have strict tracking needs. Simply speaking, no single process fits all scenarios. You need to select what works best for your team/project. Thomas Schissler | Visual Studio ALM Ranger This is an interesting discussion, I’m right now discussing details about executing code reviews with my teams. I see and understand the aspects you brought in, but there is another side as well, I’d like to point out. 1.) If you do reviews per check in this is not very practical as a hard rule because this will disturb the flow of the team very often or it will lead to reduce the checkin frequency of the devs which I would not accept. 2.) If you do later reviews, for example if you review PBIs, it is not easy to find out which code you should review. Either you review all changesets associate with the PBI, but then you might review code which has been changed with a later checkin and the dev maybe has already fixed the issue. Or you review the diff of the latest changeset of the PBI with the first but then you might also review changes of other PBIs. Jakob Leander | Sr. Director, Avanade In my experience, manual code review: 1. Does not get done and at the very least does not get redone after changes (regardless of intentions at start of project) 2. When a project actually do it, they often do not do it right away = errors pile up 3. Requires a lot of time discussing/defining the standard and for the team to learn it However code review is very important since e.g. even small memory leaks in a high volume web solution have big consequences In the last years I have advocated following approach for code review - Architects up front do “at least one best practice example” of each type of component and tell the team. Copy from this one. This should include error handling, logging, security etc. - Dev lead on project continuously browse code to validate that the best practices are used. Especially that patterns etc. are not broken. You can do this formally after each sprint/iteration if you want. Once this is validated it is unlikely to “go bad” even during later code changes Agree with customer to rely on static code analysis from Visual Studio as the one and only coding standard. This has HUUGE benefits - You can easily tweak to reach the level you desire together with customer - It is easy to measure for both developers/management - It is 100% consistent across code base - It gets validated all the time so you never end up getting hammered by a customer review in the end - It is easy to tell the developer that you do not want code back unless it has zero errors = minimize communication You need to track this at least during nightly builds and make sure team sees total # issues. Do not allow #issues it to grow uncontrolled. On the project I run I require code analysis to have run on code before checkin (checkin rule). This means -  You have to have clean compile (or CA wont run) so this is extra benefit = very few broken builds - You can change a few of the rules to compile as errors instead of warnings. I often do this for “missing dispose” issues which you REALLY do not want in your app Tip: Place your custom CA rules files as part of solution. That  way it works when you do branching etc. (path to CA file is relative in VS) Some may argue that CA is not as good as manual inspection. But since manual inspection in reality suffers from the 3 issues in start it is IMO a MUCH better (and much cheaper) approach from helicopter perspective Tirthankar Dutta | Director, Avanade I think code review should be run both before and after check ins. There are some code metrics that are meant to be run on the entire codebase … Also, especially on multi-site projects, one should strive to architect in a way that lets men manage the framework while boys write the repetitive code… scales very well with the need to review less by containment and imposing architectural restrictions to emphasise the design. Bruno Capuano | Microsoft ALM MVP For code reviews (means peer reviews) in distributed team I use http://www.vsanywhere.com/default.aspx  David Jobling | Global Sr. Director, Avanade Peer review is the only way to scale and its a great practice for all in the team to learn to perform and accept. In my experience you soon learn who's code to watch more than others and tune the attention. Mikkel Toudal Kristiansen | Manager, Avanade If you have several branches in your code base, you will need to merge often. This requires manual merging, when a file has been changed in both branches. It offers a good opportunity to actually review to changed code. So my advice is: Merging between branches should be done as often as possible, it should be done by a senior developer, and he/she should perform a full code review of the code being merged. As for detecting architectural smells and code smells creeping into the code base, one really good third party tools exist: Ndepend (http://www.ndepend.com/, for static code analysis of the current state of the code base). You could also consider adding StyleCop to the solution. Jesse Houwing | Visual Studio ALM Ranger I gave a presentation on this subject on the TechDays conference in NL last year. See my presentation and slides here (talk in Dutch, but English presentation): http://blog.jessehouwing.nl/2012/03/did-you-miss-my-techdaysnl-talk-on-code.html  I’d like to add a few more points: - Before/After checking is mostly a trust issue. If you have a team that does diligent peer reviews and regularly talk/sit together or peer review, there’s no need to enforce a before-checkin policy. The peer peer-programming and regular feedback during development can take care of most of the review requirements as long as the team isn’t under stress. - Under stress, enforce pre-checkin reviews, it might sound strange, if you’re already under time or budgetary constraints, but it is under such conditions most real issues start to be created or pile up. - Use tools to catch most common errors, Code Analysis/FxCop was already mentioned. HP Fortify, Resharper, Coderush etc can help you there. There are also a lot of 3rd party rules you can add to Code Analysis. I’ve written a few myself (http://fccopcontrib.codeplex.com) and various teams from Microsoft have added their own rules (MSOCAF for SharePoint, WSSF for WCF). For common errors that keep cropping up, see if you can define a rule. It’s much easier. But more importantly make sure you have a good help page explaining *WHY* it's wrong. If you have small feature or developer branches/shelvesets, you might want to review pre-merge. It’s still better to do peer reviews and peer programming, but the most important thing is that bad quality code doesn’t make it into the important branch. So my philosophy: - Use tooling as much as possible. - Make sure the team understands the tooling and the importance of the things it flags. It’s too easy to just click suppress all to ignore the warnings. - Under stress, tighten process, it’s under stress that the problems of late reviews will really surface - Most importantly if you do reviews do them as early as possible, but never later than needed. In other words, pre-checkin/post checking doesn’t really matter, as long as the review is done before the code is released. It’ll just be much more expensive to fix any review outcomes the later you find them. --- I would love to hear what you think!

    Read the article

  • What’s the Difference Between Succession Management and Talent Reviews?

    - by HCM-Oracle
    By Marcie Van Houten Is there a difference or are they pieces of one holistic strategic talent process? And can you have one without the other?  First, let me give a quick definition of each.  Succession planning (or management) is about creating succession slates or talent pools in support of a critical job or position or sets thereof. And then using those plans to help mitigate risk and plan talent needs for the organization.  Talent reviews (known by other names often) are sets of meetings where managers and executives come together to review, discuss and often heatedly debate the merits and potential of their employees, and then place and sometimes calibrate that talent on a performance to potential matrix.  These are some of the most strategic conversations happening in conference rooms across the globe. I speak with a lot of organizations about their practices in this area and the answers to these questions are as varied and nuanced as there are organizations thinking about them.  Some are passionate about their talent review processes and have a very evolved and thoughtful approach.  They really know their people, where their talent is, and the opportunities they plan to offer them.  And to them that is their succession process.  They may never create a slate of named candidates for a job or assign employees to formal talent pools.   On the flip side there are other organizations that create slates and slates and often multiple talent pools to support their strategic positions.  Through these, they are able to mitigate the risk associated with having a key player leave their organization.  And for them, that is their succession process.  Some will start from the lower levels of their organization and roll up their succession plans, while other organizations only cover their top 200 executives and key positions with plans.  And then there are organizations that leverage some of all of these.  Ultimately, the goals are to increase employee engagement, reduce talent-related risk, ensure the right talent is aligned to the strategic initiatives and to drive business value.  The approaches are as unique as the organizations they represent and the business opportunities they are looking to seize upon.   And that's ok.  It's great in fact. Because one thing that is common is the recognition that the need to know your people and align your top talent to the future needs of the organization is mission critical. Sure, there are a set of commonly recognized best practices and guiding principles for all of this.  There is no one right or perfect answer.  And that is what makes this all so much darn fun.  With Talent Review and Succession Management from Oracle HCM Cloud, we’ve blended the ability to support your strategic talent review conversations with both succession plans and talent pools allowing for one very seamless and interactive process. So whether you create a lot of succession plans, only focus on talent pools, have a robust talent review process, or all of the above, Oracle has you covered. I’m looking forward to spending time with our customers at the upcoming OHUG Global Conference 2014 happening June 9-13 in Las Vegas.  It’s an opportunity for me to talk to customers about their business and how they are doing strategic talent processes like talent reviews and succession.  I hope to see you there. Marcie Van Houten brings over 20 years of management consulting, information systems and human capital management experience to her role as director of product strategy at Oracle. Ms. Van Houten has spent the past several years at Oracle working closely with customers to help drive the direction of the company's talent and succession management applications. Additionally, she spent nine years at PeopleSoft as Director of Information Systems leading human capital management implementation projects. Marcie Van Houten lives in Walnut Creek, California, and holds a MBA from Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas.  You can follow her on Twitter: @MarcieVH

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to submit an update for an app on the AppStore without losing reviews?

    - by Frank Krueger
    Whenever I submit an update for me app, the number of reviews visible for it drops to 0. If the customer bothers to click through they can see the previous versions' reviews... But the damage has been done. Since the app has 0 stars, I see a significant drop in sales. It takes the app a good week of earning new reviews to restore sales. I usually version the app as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 etc. Is there something I can do during the update process to prevent losing reviews like this?

    Read the article

  • Integrating POP3 client functionality into a C# application?

    - by flesh
    I have a web application that requires a server based component to periodically access POP3 email boxes and retrieve emails. The service then needs to process the emails which will involve: Validating the email against some business rules (does it contain a valid reference in the subject line, which user sent the mail, etc.) Analysing and saving any attachments to disk Take the email body and attachment details and create a new item in the database Or update an existing item where the reference matches the incoming email subject line What is the best way to approach this? I really don't want to have to write a POP3 client from scratch, but I need to be able to customize the processing of emails. Ideally I would be able to plug in some component that does the access and retrieval for me, returning arrays of attachments, body text, subject line, etc. ready for my processing... [ UPDATE: Reviews ] OK, so I have spent a fair amount of time looking into (mainly free) .NET POP3 libraries so I thought I'd provide a short review of some of those mentioned below and a few others: Pop3.net - free - works OK, very basic in terms of functionality provided. This is pretty much just the POP3 commands and some base64 encoding, but it's very straight forward - probably a good introduction Pop3 Wizard - commercial / some open source code - couldn't get this to build, missing DLLs, I wouldn't bother with this C#Mail - free - works well, comes with Mime parser and SMTP client, however the comments are in Japanese (not a big deal) and it didn't work with SSL 'out of the box' - I had to change the SslStream constructor after which it worked no problem OpenPOP - free - hasn't been updated for about 5 years so it's current state is .NET 1.0, doesn't support SSL but that was no problem to resolve - I just replaced the existing stream with an SslStream and it worked. Comes with Mime parser. Of the free libraries, I'd go for C#Mail or OpenPOP. I looked at a few commercial libraries: Chillkat, Rebex, RemObjects, JMail.net. Based on features, price and impression of the company I would probably go for Rebex and may in the future if my requirements change or I run into production issues with either of C#Mail or OpenPOP. In case anyone's needs it, this is the replacement SslStream constructor that I used to enable SSL with C#Mail and OpenPOP: SslStream stream = new SslStream(clientSocket.GetStream(), false, delegate(object sender, X509Certificate cert, X509Chain chain, SslPolicyErrors errors) { return true; });

    Read the article

  • Best ASP.NET E-Commerce Framework (aspDotNetStoreFront, AbleCommerce, BVCommerce, MediaChase,...)

    - by EfficionDave
    I need a full-featured asp.net E-Commerce solution for a project. It needs to be easily extensible as I need to extend it to integrate with a custom Flash based personalization engine. It should also have a great administrative back-end that handles inventory tracking, report, labels, shipping, ... so that the client can really use it as the basis for their business. I've used quite a few different E-Commerce systems including OSCommerce, Zen Cart, Catalook, and eTailer. While I was impressed with Zen Cart and eTailer, this project is big enough that I want to try a more serious, commercial offering. I'm particularly interested in thoughts on aspdotnetstorefront, BVCommerce, AbleCommerce, and MediaChase. [UPDATE] I've done quite a bit of evaluation since I posted this question and will give some of my findings below: BVCommerce - The price point is nice, the product seems fairly well regarded, and I've heard good things about customizing/extending it, it just doesn't seem like it's going to meet my needs as an Top Tier ECommerce solution. After viewing the tutorial videos, the Admin interface just seems too basic and outdated. aspDotNetStorefront - The integration with DotNetNuke was it's biggest selling point for me but after reading peoples opinions, it's integration seems quite weak. It's sounds like there's a significant learning curve and the architecture just doesn't sound like it's as clean as it should be. AbleCommerce - After a rather thorough evaluation, I have selected AbleCommerce for at least my next project. The Admin interface is beautiful and has a nice list of features. The E-Commerce portion of the user side is very well done, highly skin-able (using Master Pages and a couple other techniques), and the checkout workflow has all the features I need while still being very clean. Source to the API can be bought for $500 but you generally won't need it. There are some 3rd party modules available but there's not currently a large market for these. The biggest glaring weakness of AbleCommerce I've found is their CMS capabilities are very limited and not at all well suited for a non-technical user to make most site content updates. But I have a good solution for that that I plan adapting into AbleCommerce. They will automatically generate a site for you to play with to your heart's content for 30 days. It is defniitely worth checking out.

    Read the article

  • Content light website and Google - Tell google it's a listings site (as opposed shop, reviews or restaurants)

    - by Doug Firr
    I have a listings style website. Due to the nature of this (listings) the site is content light. Each page is typically less that 50 words but there are many pages. The site in question has had a ton of media coverage and so has some great inbound links from places like Wired, Fast Company, Canada Broadcasting Corporation and many many other bloggers, media websites and recycle related niche authors (It's a recycling site). But Google really ignores it. Traffic from search is very very low - less than 5% of all traffic. I know that using markup you can tell Google whether your site is a restaurant, article, review, shop, local business and a few other categories (https://www.google.com/webmasters/markup-helper/u/0/). Is there a way to tell Google that my site is a listings site? I suspect, but do not know for sure, that part of the problem is that Google simply does not know what my site is? It's a crowdmap where people post curbalerts. The information is useful to people but it is presented in a short, concise way - a pin on a map, a picture and a short description. Adding anything further is not necessary for the site's intended purpose. 1st question - how best to tell the search engines what y site is - listings and not some spammy website? Any recommendations in improving our site's Search presence? You can take a look here if interested: http://tinyurl.com/lxg4hn7

    Read the article

  • Social-network, online community, company and job reviews, salaries statistics and much more.. Do we have it? Do we need it?

    - by Vlad Lazarenko
    I have many friends from Ukraine who are programmers. So I found out that they have a web site that collects, organizes and analyzing information about IT companies, which includes location, feedbacks, company reviews from current and former employees etc. They also collect programming salaries and organize them by language, region etc. That web site is ran by programmers and for programmers, all information is absolutely public and free. Plus, web site has forums, and people can discuss (more or less social than specific programming stuff) things, publish articles, news etc. I personally think that is useful, especially for those who are new in this industry. For example, you may do a small research and find out that, for example, Java programmers getting paid more than PHP programmers but demand is lower. Or you get an offer from the company, is about to accept it, but read reviews and find out that they don't even provide internet access at work and if you need to download something, you have to ask your manager to do it for you, and managers share a single computer that has internet connection to get that stuff for you (there is only one such company in Kiev, Ukraine, called SMK, for Software Mac Kiev, a big shame). So the question is - do we have something like it in US? Or at least, say, for New York region? Or state? All information I managed to find online is inaccurate or not full. Forums are very specific. If we don't have it, would you be interested in creating such a portal? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • What should be done first: Code reviews or Unit tests?

    - by goldenmean
    Hello, If a developer implements code for some module and wants to get it reviewed. What should be the order : *First unit test the module after designing test cases for the module, debugging and fixing the bugs and then give the modified code for peer code review (Pros- Code to be reviewed is 'clean' to a good extent. Reduces some avoidable review comments and rework. Cons- Developer might spend large time debugging/fixing a bug which could have pointed/anticipated in peer code reviews) Or *First do the code review with peers and then go for unit testing. What are your thoughts/experience on this? I believe this approach for unit testing, code reviewing should be programming language agnostic, but it would be interesting to know otherwise(if applicable) with specific examples. -AD

    Read the article

  • STORM Cloud Servers — Anybody Used Them? Any Reviews and/or Advice? [closed]

    - by AJB
    I just posted this in StackOverflow before I realized that Serverfault existed ... Hi folks, Just wondering if anyone has used STORM Cloud Servers from Liquid Web: https://www.stormondemand.com/cloud-server/ I'm shopping for a new hosting provider for my server that has about 50 'mom & pop' domains on it and finding that webhosting has changed a lot in the last ten years. I feel like I'm trying to buy 100 cellphone plans at once. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Reviews Cheyney Group Marketing: What accounting softwares are available in the market for small businesses?

    - by user225556
    Accounting is the language of business, and good accounting software can save you hundreds of hours at the business equivalent of Berlitz. There's no substitute for an accounting pro who knows the ins and outs of tax law, but today's desktop packages can help you with everything from routine bookkeeping to payroll, taxes, and planning. Each package also produces files that you can hand off to an accountant as needed. Small-business managers have more accounting software options than ever, including subscription Web-based options that don't require their users to install or update software. Many businesses, however--including those that need to track large inventories or client databases, and those that prefer not to entrust their data to the cloud--may be happier with a desktop tool. We looked at three general-purpose, small-business accounting packages: Acclivity AccountEdgePro 2012 (both the product and the company were previously called MYOB), Intuit QuickBooks Premier 2012, and Sage's Sage 50 Complete 2013 (the successor to Peachtree Complete). All three packages offer a solid array of tools for tracking income and expenses, invoicing, managing payroll, and creating reports. These full-featured and highly mature programs don't come cheap. Acclivity AccountEdge Pro, at $299, is the least expensive; and prices climb if you opt to use common time-saving add-ons such as payroll services, or if you add licenses for multiple user accounts. All three are solid on the basics, but they have distinct differences in style and focus. The more you know about your accounting requirements, the more closely you'll want to look at the software you're thinking of buying. Sage 50 Complete should appeal most to people who understand the fine points of accounting and can use the product's many customization features (especially for businesses that manage inventory). QuickBooks works hard to appeal to newbies who need only the basics and might be intimidated by the level of detail and technical language exposed in the other two packages. At the same time, it also has a slew of third-party add-ons that meet specific needs and greatly expand its capabilities. AccountEdge Pro balances accessibility with a strong feature set at an affordable price. It's especially suitable for businesses that need to provide simultaneous access to multiple users.

    Read the article

  • Reviews Cheyney Group Marketing: What accounting softwares are available in the market for small businesses?

    - by user224313
    Accounting is the language of business, and good accounting software can save you hundreds of hours at the business equivalent of Berlitz. There's no substitute for an accounting pro who knows the ins and outs of tax law, but today's desktop packages can help you with everything from routine bookkeeping to payroll, taxes, and planning. Each package also produces files that you can hand off to an accountant as needed. Small-business managers have more accounting software options than ever, including subscription Web-based options that don't require their users to install or update software. Many businesses, however--including those that need to track large inventories or client databases, and those that prefer not to entrust their data to the cloud--may be happier with a desktop tool. We looked at three general-purpose, small-business accounting packages: Acclivity AccountEdgePro 2012 (both the product and the company were previously called MYOB), Intuit QuickBooks Premier 2012, and Sage's Sage 50 Complete 2013 (the successor to Peachtree Complete). All three packages offer a solid array of tools for tracking income and expenses, invoicing, managing payroll, and creating reports. These full-featured and highly mature programs don't come cheap. Acclivity AccountEdge Pro, at $299, is the least expensive; and prices climb if you opt to use common time-saving add-ons such as payroll services, or if you add licenses for multiple user accounts. All three are solid on the basics, but they have distinct differences in style and focus. The more you know about your accounting requirements, the more closely you'll want to look at the software you're thinking of buying. Sage 50 Complete should appeal most to people who understand the fine points of accounting and can use the product's many customization features (especially for businesses that manage inventory). QuickBooks works hard to appeal to newbies who need only the basics and might be intimidated by the level of detail and technical language exposed in the other two packages. At the same time, it also has a slew of third-party add-ons that meet specific needs and greatly expand its capabilities. AccountEdge Pro balances accessibility with a strong feature set at an affordable price. It's especially suitable for businesses that need to provide simultaneous access to multiple users.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  | Next Page >