Search Results

Search found 5991 results on 240 pages for 'iwork numbers'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 60/240 | < Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >

  • Is there a 128 or 256 bit double class in .net?

    - by AKRamkumar
    I have an application that I want to be able to use large numbers and very precise numbers. For this, I needed a precision interpretation and IntX only works for integers. Is there a class in .net framework or even third party(preferably free) that would do this? Is there another way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Repeating random variables in VBA

    - by Soo
    How can I use randomize and rnd to get a repeating list of random variables? By repeating list, I mean if you run a loop to get 10 random numbers, each random number in the list will be unique. In addition, if you were to run this sequence again, you would get the same 10 random numbers as before.

    Read the article

  • string and z-depth animation, as3

    - by VideoDnd
    How do I pass this string to my children? formatCount(fcount) is the value I'm trying to pass to children timer is the value the children are recieving now Timer that loops through an array of displayObjects var timer:Timer = new Timer(100); var count:int = 0; var fcount:int = 0; timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.TIMER, countdown); function countdown(event:TimerEvent) { count++; fcount=int(count*count/1000); //myText.text = formatCount(fcount); //LOOPS THROUGH MY LIST ITEMS 'see array at bottom' var currentFrame:int = timer.currentCount % frames.length; for (var i:int = 0; i < frames.length; ++i) { frames[i].visible = (i == currentFrame); } } timer.start(); //SUBSTRING AND ZERO PLACEHOLDER function formatCount(i:int):String { var fraction:int = i % 100; var whole:int = i / 100; return ("0000000" + whole).substr(-7, 7) + "." + (fraction < 10 ? "0" + fraction : fraction); } //PASS MATH TO SPRITE HANDLER function spriteHandler(e:Event):void { numbers.setTime(formatCount(fcount)); } //LOST ARGUMENT==>GOES TO NUMBERSVIEW //var numbers:NumbersView; var numbers:*; //MY ARRAY 'list of numbers, one-to-zero' var frames:Array = [new Frame1(),new Frame2(),new Frame3(), new Frame4(),new Frame5(),new Frame6(),new Frame7(),new Frame8(),new Frame9(), new Frame0()]; for each (var frame:Sprite in frames) { addChild(frame); } Example of NumbersView 'increment and place display objects across the stage' function NumbersView() { _listItems = new Array(); previousNums = new Array(); var item:NumberImage; for (var i:Number = 0; i <= 9; i++) { item = new NumberImage(); addChild(item); item.x = i * item.width; _listItems.push(item); } }

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to figure out (approximately) what line of source code a kernel module is hung on, fr

    - by Mike Heinz
    I'm trying to debug what appears to be a completion queue issue: Apr 14 18:39:15 ST2035 kernel: Call Trace: Apr 14 18:39:15 ST2035 kernel: [<ffffffff8049b295>] schedule_timeout+0x1e/0xad Apr 14 18:39:15 ST2035 kernel: [<ffffffff8049a81c>] wait_for_common+0xd5/0x13c Apr 14 18:39:15 ST2035 kernel: [<ffffffffa01ca32b>] ib_unregister_mad_agent+0x376/0x4c9 [ib_mad] Apr 14 18:39:16 ST2035 kernel: [<ffffffffa03058f4>] ib_umad_close+0xbd/0xfd Is it possible to turn those hex numbers into something close to line numbers?

    Read the article

  • [Qt] Check octal number

    - by sterh
    Hello, I write simple application in C++/Qt. And i have a text and some octal number in it. My app splits this text by spaces. And i need to check octal numbers from text. How can i select octal numbers from this text with regular expressions? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How to check how many characters in variable, and add space between characters in that var?

    - by Camran
    I have a 'price' variable that contains some integer number from a MySQL database. I want to check how many numbers the 'price' variable contains, and add a space in the variable depending on how many numbers. See below: Example: If 'price' is 150000 I would like the output to be 150 000 (notice the space). OR, if it is 19000 I would like it to output 19 000... How would you do this the easiest way?

    Read the article

  • mysql query trouble

    - by Bharanikumar
    Hi , in my database i have phone numbers with country code , which look somthing like 0044-123456 0044-123456 0014-123456 0014-123456 0024-123456 0024-123456 0034-123456 0044-123456 0044-123456 0024-123456 0034-123456 084-123456 084-123456 i want to total up the numbers by country, something like this output 0044 (2) 0024 (2) 0034 (1) 084 (2) 064 (5) Is it possible to do this with a SQL query?

    Read the article

  • display 25 randomnumbers from an array

    - by qwerty
    Hello, I have in C++ an array of 100 elements, so v[1], ... ,v[100] contains numbers. How can i display, 25 random numbers from this array? So i wanna select 25 random positions from this array and display the values.. How can i do this in C++? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • question about combinatorical

    - by davit-datuashvili
    here is task How many ways are there to choose from the set {1, 2, . . . , 100} three distinct numbers so that their sum is even? first of all sum of three numbers is even if only if 1.all number is even 2.two of them is odd and one is even i know that (n) = n!/(k!*(n-k)! (k) and can anybody help me to solve this problem

    Read the article

  • Exceptions handling in SQL?

    - by Vineet
    Is there any way to handle exceptions in sql(ORACLE 9i)? Since I was trying to divide values of a column that contains both numbers and literals ,I need to fetch out only numbers from it ,as if it divisible by any number then its number else if contains literals it would not get divided it will generate error. how to handle those errors? Please suggest!!

    Read the article

  • which delimeter to use while spliting String

    - by London
    I need to split this line string in each line, I need to get the third word(film name) but as you see the delimeter is one big blank character in some cases its small like before the numbers at the end or its big as in front of numbers at front. I tried using string split with(" ") regex, and also \t but get the out of the bounds error. 400115305 Lionel_Atwill The_Song_of_Songs_(1933_film) 7587 400115309 Brian_Aherne A_Night_to_Remember_(1943_film) 7952 Did anyone have the same problem?

    Read the article

  • Using IF LARGE when there is text in column

    - by Ray
    I have an excel column of numbers and texts. I tried to use "IF LARGE" to find top 3 numbers of the column (A1 to A7), and return "Yes" to the cells right next to the top 3 (in column B). But unfortunately, the cells next to the texts also returned "Yes". This is the data: 0.2 0.3 Yes 0.5 Yes 0.1 0.8 Yes asdf Yes jklm Yes This is the code for cell B7: =IF(A7>=LARGE($A$1:$A$7,3),"Yes","") Any suggestions to fix this? thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Lotto program doesn't stop

    - by Naseyb Yaramis
    So I'm making a lotto game. You have to enter 6 lucky numbers and if they're the same as the lotto numbers then you win. Here is my code: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace OefeningExaam { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Random getal = new Random(); int[] lottotrekking = new int[6]; Console.WriteLine("Geef je geluksgetallen in <tussen 1 en 42>"); Console.WriteLine("Geef je eerste getal in"); int getal1 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); Console.WriteLine("Geef je tweede getal in"); int getal2 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); Console.WriteLine("Geef je derde getal in"); int getal3 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); Console.WriteLine("Geef je vierde getal in"); int getal4 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); Console.WriteLine("Geef je vijfde getal in"); int getal5 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); Console.WriteLine("Geef je zesde getal in"); int getal6 = Convert.ToInt32(Console.ReadLine()); while (getal1 != lottotrekking[0] || getal2 != lottotrekking[1] || getal3 != lottotrekking[2] || getal4 != lottotrekking[3] || getal5 != lottotrekking[4] || getal5 != lottotrekking[4] || getal6 != lottotrekking[5]) { for (int i = 0; i < lottotrekking.Length; i++) { int cijfer = getal.Next(1, 43); lottotrekking[i] = cijfer; Console.WriteLine(lottotrekking[0] + "\t " + lottotrekking[1] + "\t " + lottotrekking[2] + "\t " + lottotrekking[3] + "\t " + lottotrekking[4] + "\t " + lottotrekking[5]); } } if (getal1 == lottotrekking[0] && getal2 == lottotrekking[1] && getal3 == lottotrekking[2] && getal4 == lottotrekking[3] && getal5 == lottotrekking[4] && getal5 == lottotrekking[4] && getal6 == lottotrekking[5]) { Console.WriteLine(lottotrekking[0] + " " + lottotrekking[1] + " " + lottotrekking[2] + " " + lottotrekking[3] + " " + lottotrekking[4] + " " + lottotrekking[5]); } Console.ReadLine(); } } } The problem is that the program just keeps going and doesn't stop. It's supposed to stop when the lucky numbers are the same as the lotto numbers.

    Read the article

  • Array help in C++

    - by user267237
    I am writing a program that is declaring an array of 100 integer numbers and filling the array with random numbers using rand(). All I have so far is: #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { int random_integer = rand();

    Read the article

  • Excel "Remove Duplicates" feature does not remove all duplicates

    - by raph82
    When the Data ToolsRemove Duplicates command is used on the following list, some duplicates are not removed: Key 46509 46509 51442 51442 73367 73367 80048 80048 88396 88396 102576 102576 108095 108095 118613 118613 127224 127224 137549 137549 140164 140164 151679 151679 152975 152975 154986 154986 167715 167715 169166 169166 170427 170427 176303 176303 187038 187038 199856 199856 206589 206589 225371 225371 229767 229767 230680 230680 245333 245333 253697 253697 256002 256002 262094 262094 273060 273060 275584 275584 285569 285569 301930 301930 304993 304993 305965 305965 307299 307299 311438 311438 314461 314461 340545 340545 344517 344517 355035 355035 358387 358387 359982 359982 363904 363904 368642 368642 378666 378666 378744 378744 382396 382396 393542 393542 394320 394320 395258 395258 402047 402047 421796 421796 427972 427972 442651 442651 442654 442654 445786 445786 447124 447124 456682 456682 467303 467303 470437 470437 476340 476340 480976 480976 481450 481450 498967 498967 516068 516068 517592 517592 522621 522621 524678 524678 529405 529405 532909 532909 535096 535096 540835 540835 553197 553197 566893 566893 567730 567730 570751 570751 572259 572259 581701 581701 589753 589753 597923 597923 602282 602282 612011 612011 643774 643774 649471 649471 654159 654159 661681 661681 680578 680578 709714 709714 728036 728036 728680 728680 740252 740252 750843 750843 763430 763430 777724 777724 777870 777870 779703 779703 787034 787034 789776 789776 793859 793859 798479 798479 812410 812410 816599 816599 820169 820169 821236 821236 833511 833511 833701 833701 845925 845925 854408 854408 882853 882853 891710 891710 906251 906251 929802 929802 982039 982039 984503 984503 984539 984539 987889 987889 997188 997188 1002869 1002869 1018493 1018493 1020735 1020735 1028780 1028780 1032460 1032460 1047306 1047306 1052136 1052136 1054482 1054482 1062633 1062633 1066509 1066509 1069500 1069500 1075339 1075339 1082282 1082282 1100206 1100206 1105407 1105407 1111409 1111409 1112175 1112175 1112407 1112407 1113400 1113400 1117243 1117243 1121732 1121732 1152461 1152461 1153727 1153727 1157252 1157252 1163384 1163384 1195324 1195324 1197373 1197373 1201828 1201828 1202786 1202786 1216328 1216328 1223541 1223541 1225848 1225848 1228595 1228595 1239281 1239281 1264378 1264378 1267348 1267348 1291510 1291510 1309891 1309891 1321106 1321106 1322886 1322886 1327690 1327690 1344145 1344145 1346250 1346250 1352350 1352350 1357920 1357920 1363386 1363386 1365046 1365046 1370383 1370383 1376666 1376666 1383834 1383834 1414472 1414472 1418967 1418967 1419811 1419811 1421587 1421587 1432639 1432639 1442854 1442854 1455236 1455236 1461896 1461896 1466376 1466376 1477670 1477670 1480154 1480154 1481801 1481801 1498209 1498209 1504776 1504776 1511904 1511904 1017854_447 1017854_447 1085496_19 1085496_19 1280601_77 1280601_77 1350662_135 1350662_135 141944_382 141944_382 1525893_483 1525893_483 455968_177 455968_177 469495_157 469495_157 641583_74 641583_74 704267_63 704267_63 709992_199 709992_199 819399_224 819399_224 832188_358 832188_358 857189_467 857189_467 898328_334 898328_334 91033_245 91033_245 960992_341 960992_341 999706_361 999706_361 BLA1048669 BLA1048669 BLA1052457 BLA1052457 BLA1055176 BLA1055176 BLA1060585 BLA1060585 BLA1067125 BLA1067125 BLA107601 BLA107601 BLA1087509 BLA1087509 BLA1097390 BLA1097390 BLA1122471 BLA1122471 BLA1126436 BLA1126436 BLA112694 BLA112694 BLA1148652 BLA1148652 BLA1149504 BLA1149504 BLA1155256 BLA1155256 BLA1222348 BLA1222348 BLA1225575 BLA1225575 BLA1227779 BLA1227779 BLA124071 BLA124071 BLA1247411 BLA1247411 BLA1258830 BLA1258830 BLA1281625 BLA1281625 BLA128165 BLA128165 BLA1305848 BLA1305848 BLA1307751 BLA1307751 BLA130926 BLA130926 BLA1334270 BLA1334270 BLA1335674 BLA1335674 BLA1340102 BLA1340102 BLA1345080 BLA1345080 BLA1353398 BLA1353398 BLA1369834 BLA1369834 BLA1424977 BLA1424977 BLA142669 BLA142669 BLA1429760 BLA1429760 BLA1443592 BLA1443592 BLA1447085 BLA1447085 BLA1453639 BLA1453639 BLA1456355 BLA1456355 BLA1458745 BLA1458745 BLA148663 BLA148663 BLA1494220 BLA1494220 BLA1522880 BLA1522880 BLA152562 BLA152562 BLA1548628 BLA1548628 BLA182644 BLA182644 BLA186707 BLA186707 BLA188073 BLA188073 BLA199127 BLA199127 BLA207148 BLA207148 BLA209939 BLA209939 BLA232119 BLA232119 BLA240725 BLA240725 BLA267275 BLA267275 BLA303829 BLA303829 BLA346044 BLA346044 BLA348268 BLA348268 BLA367863 BLA367863 BLA386897 BLA386897 BLA390799 BLA390799 BLA415724 BLA415724 BLA425291 BLA425291 BLA427093 BLA427093 BLA462355 BLA462355 BLA46821 BLA46821 BLA477637 BLA477637 BLA501111 BLA501111 BLA522126 BLA522126 BLA530906 BLA530906 BLA576525 BLA576525 BLA639361 BLA639361 BLA644530 BLA644530 BLA65754 BLA65754 BLA670003 BLA670003 BLA687525 BLA687525 BLA709367 BLA709367 BLA714281 BLA714281 BLA719328 BLA719328 BLA736457 BLA736457 BLA759669 BLA759669 BLA76056 BLA76056 BLA767666 BLA767666 BLA780853 BLA780853 BLA793029 BLA793029 BLA796639 BLA796639 BLA803743 BLA803743 BLA815298 BLA815298 BLA828243 BLA828243 BLA864030 BLA864030 BLA864110 BLA864110 BLA882892 BLA882892 BLA885665 BLA885665 BLA897478 BLA897478 BLA903861 BLA903861 BLA91627 BLA91627 BLA925523 BLA925523 BLA928243 BLA928243 BLA932395 BLA932395 BLA935341 BLA935341 BLA940705 BLA940705 BLA966386 BLA966386 A message is displayed indicating 293 duplicate values were removed and 307 unique values remain. 7 duplicates are not removed: 1280601_77 1525893_483 455968_177 469495_157 641583_74 704267_63 709992_199 The initial list consist of Excel-ordered values of: numbers between 40,000 and 1,500,000 numbers in the same range with and added _ and a 1-999 suffix numbers in the same range prefixed with BLA Each value is present exactly twice. There are no formula involved. I already checked for extra spaces. Immediately reapplying the Remove Duplicates command does not remove the remaining duplicate values. Reapplying the Remove Duplicates command after a reverse-sort seems to remove the remaining duplicates. Reverse-sorting before using the first Remove Duplicates changes the result (213 duplicate values removed and 387 unique values remained), only in the non-suffixed non-prefixed group. Can you reproduce this bug in Excel 2007 like I do? What triggers it? Could it the composite (numbers and text) data set? I'm not looking for alternatives. I want to know when not to use the feature and revert to already known (Excel 2003 era) alternatives.

    Read the article

  • e2fsck extremely slow, although enough memory exists

    - by kaefert
    I've got this external USB-Disk: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ lsusb -s 2:3 Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0bc2:3320 Seagate RSS LLC As can be seen in this dmesg output, there is some problem that prevents that disk from beeing mounted: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ dmesg ... [ 113.084079] usb 2-1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd [ 113.217783] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0bc2, idProduct=3320 [ 113.217787] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3, SerialNumber=1 [ 113.217790] usb 2-1: Product: Expansion Desk [ 113.217792] usb 2-1: Manufacturer: Seagate [ 113.217794] usb 2-1: SerialNumber: NA4J4N6K [ 113.435404] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas [ 113.455315] Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... [ 113.468051] scsi5 : usb-storage 2-1:1.0 [ 113.468180] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage [ 113.468182] USB Mass Storage support registered. [ 114.473105] scsi 5:0:0:0: Direct-Access Seagate Expansion Desk 070B PQ: 0 ANSI: 6 [ 114.474342] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.475089] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off [ 114.475092] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00 [ 114.475959] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA [ 114.477093] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.501649] sdb: sdb1 [ 114.502717] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566645 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB) [ 114.504354] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk [ 116.804408] EXT4-fs (sdb1): ext4_check_descriptors: Checksum for group 3976 failed (47397!=61519) [ 116.804413] EXT4-fs (sdb1): group descriptors corrupted! ... So I went and fired up my favorite partition manager - gparted, and told it to verify and repair the partition sdb1. This made gparted call e2fsck (version 1.42.4 (12-Jun-2012)) e2fsck -f -y -v /dev/sdb1 Although gparted called e2fsck with the "-v" option, sadly it doesn't show me the output of my e2fsck process (bugreport https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467925 ) I started this whole thing on Sunday (2012-11-04_2200) evening, so about 48 hours ago, this is what htop says about it now (2012-11-06-1900): PID USER PRI NI VIRT RES SHR S CPU% MEM% TIME+ Command 3704 root 39 19 1560M 1166M 768 R 98.0 19.5 42h56:43 e2fsck -f -y -v /dev/sdb1 Now I found a few posts on the internet that discuss e2fsck running slow, for example: http://gparted-forum.surf4.info/viewtopic.php?id=13613 where they write that its a good idea to see if the disk is just that slow because maybe its damaged, and I think these outputs tell me that this is not the case in my case: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 3562 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1783.29 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 82 MB in 3.01 seconds = 27.26 MB/sec kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo hdparm /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: multcount = 0 (off) readonly = 0 (off) readahead = 256 (on) geometry = 364801/255/63, sectors = 5860533160, start = 0 However, although I can read quickly from that disk, this disk speed doesn't seem to be used by e2fsck, considering tools like gkrellm or iotop or this: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ iostat -x Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (blechmobil) 2012-11-06 _x86_64_ (2 CPU) avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 14,24 47,81 14,63 0,95 0,00 22,37 Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await r_await w_await svctm %util sda 0,59 8,29 2,42 5,14 43,17 160,17 53,75 0,30 39,80 8,72 54,42 3,95 2,99 sdb 137,54 5,48 9,23 0,20 587,07 22,73 129,35 0,07 7,70 7,51 16,18 2,17 2,04 Now I researched a little bit on how to find out what e2fsck is doing with all that processor time, and I found the tool strace, which gives me this: kaefert@blechmobil:~$ sudo strace -p3704 lseek(4, 41026998272, SEEK_SET) = 41026998272 write(4, "\212\354K[_\361\3nl\212\245\352\255jR\303\354\312Yv\334p\253r\217\265\3567\325\257\3766"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404766720, SEEK_SET) = 48404766720 read(4, "\7t\260\366\346\337\304\210\33\267j\35\377'\31f\372\252\ffU\317.y\211\360\36\240c\30`\34"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 41027002368, SEEK_SET) = 41027002368 write(4, "\232]7Ws\321\352\t\1@[+5\263\334\276{\343zZx\352\21\316`1\271[\202\350R`"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404770816, SEEK_SET) = 48404770816 read(4, "\17\362r\230\327\25\346//\210H\v\311\3237\323K\304\306\361a\223\311\324\272?\213\tq \370\24"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 41027006464, SEEK_SET) = 41027006464 write(4, "\367yy>x\216?=\324Z\305\351\376&\25\244\210\271\22\306}\276\237\370(\214\205G\262\360\257#"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 48404774912, SEEK_SET) = 48404774912 read(4, "\365\25\0\21|T\0\21}3t_\272\373\222k\r\177\303\1\201\261\221$\261B\232\3142\21U\316"..., 4096) = 4096 ^CProcess 3704 detached around 16 of these lines every second, so 4 read and 4 write operations every second, which I don't consider to be a lot.. And finally, my question: Will this process ever finish? If those numbers from fseek (48404774912) represent bytes, that would be something like 45 gigabytes, with this beeing a 3 terrabyte disk, which would give me 134 days to go, if the speed stays constant, and e2fsck scans the disk like this completly and only once. Do you have some advice for me? I have most of the data on that disk elsewhere, but I've put a lot of hours into sorting and merging it to this disk, so I would prefer to getting this disk up and running again, without formatting it anew. I don't think that the hardware is damaged since the disk is only a few months and since I can't see any I/O errors in the dmesg output. UPDATE: I just looked at the strace output again (2012-11-06_2300), now it looks like this: lseek(4, 1419860611072, SEEK_SET) = 1419860611072 read(4, "3#\f\2447\335\0\22A\355\374\276j\204'\207|\217V|\23\245[\7VP\251\242\276\207\317:"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018145792, SEEK_SET) = 43018145792 write(4, "]\206\231\342Y\204-2I\362\242\344\6R\205\361\324\177\265\317C\334V\324\260\334\275t=\10F."..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 1419860615168, SEEK_SET) = 1419860615168 read(4, "\262\305\314Y\367\37x\326\245\226\226\320N\333$s\34\204\311\222\7\315\236\336\300TK\337\264\236\211n"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018149888, SEEK_SET) = 43018149888 write(4, "\271\224m\311\224\25!I\376\16;\377\0\223H\25Yd\201Y\342\r\203\271\24eG<\202{\373V"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 1419860619264, SEEK_SET) = 1419860619264 read(4, ";d\360\177\n\346\253\210\222|\250\352T\335M\33\260\320\261\7g\222P\344H?t\240\20\2548\310"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 43018153984, SEEK_SET) = 43018153984 write(4, "\360\252j\317\310\251G\227\335{\214`\341\267\31Y\202\360\v\374\307oq\3063\217Z\223\313\36D\211"..., 4096) = 4096 So the numbers in the lseek lines before the reads, like 1419860619264 are already a lot bigger, standing for 1.29 terabytes if those numbers are bytes, so it doesn't seem to be a linear progress on a big scale, maybe there are only some areas that need work, that have big gaps in between them. UPDATE2: Okey, big disappointment, the numbers are back to very small again (2012-11-07_0720) lseek(4, 52174548992, SEEK_SET) = 52174548992 read(4, "\374\312\22\\\325\215\213\23\0357U\222\246\370v^f(\312|f\212\362\343\375\373\342\4\204mU6"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 46603526144, SEEK_SET) = 46603526144 write(4, "\370\261\223\227\23?\4\4\217\264\320_Am\246CQ\313^\203U\253\274\204\277\2564n\227\177\267\343"..., 4096) = 4096 so either e2fsck goes over the data multiple times, or it just hops back and forth multiple times. Or my assumption that those numbers are bytes is wrong. UPDATE3: Since it's mentioned here http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=282125&page=2 that you can testisk while e2fsck is running, i tried that, though not with a lot of success. When asking testdisk to display the data of my partition, this is what I get: TestDisk 6.13, Data Recovery Utility, November 2011 Christophe GRENIER <[email protected]> http://www.cgsecurity.org 1 P Linux 0 4 5 45600 40 8 732566272 Can't open filesystem. Filesystem seems damaged. And this is what strace currently gives me (2012-11-07_1030) lseek(4, 212460343296, SEEK_SET) = 212460343296 read(4, "\315Mb\265v\377Gn \24\f\205EHh\2349~\330\273\203\3375\206\10\r3=W\210\372\352"..., 4096) = 4096 lseek(4, 47347830784, SEEK_SET) = 47347830784 write(4, "]\204\223\300I\357\4\26\33+\243\312G\230\250\371*m2U\t_\215\265J \252\342Pm\360D"..., 4096) = 4096 (times are in CET)

    Read the article

  • More Fun with C# Iterators and Generators

    - by James Michael Hare
    In my last post, I talked quite a bit about iterators and how they can be really powerful tools for filtering a list of items down to a subset of items.  This had both pros and cons over returning a full collection, which, in summary, were:   Pros: If traversal is only partial, does not have to visit rest of collection. If evaluation method is costly, only incurs that cost on elements visited. Adds little to no garbage collection pressure.    Cons: Very slight performance impact if you know caller will always consume all items in collection. And as we saw in the last post, that con for the cost was very, very small and only really became evident on very tight loops consuming very large lists completely.    One of the key items to note, though, is the garbage!  In the traditional (return a new collection) method, if you have a 1,000,000 element collection, and wish to transform or filter it in some way, you have to allocate space for that copy of the collection.  That is, say you have a collection of 1,000,000 items and you want to double every item in the collection.  Well, that means you have to allocate a collection to hold those 1,000,000 items to return, which is a lot especially if you are just going to use it once and toss it.   Iterators, though, don't have this problem.  Each time you visit the node, it would return the doubled value of the node (in this example) and not allocate a second collection of 1,000,000 doubled items.  Do you see the distinction?  In both cases, we're consuming 1,000,000 items.  But in one case we pass back each doubled item which is just an int (for example's sake) on the stack and in the other case, we allocate a list containing 1,000,000 items which then must be garbage collected.   So iterators in C# are pretty cool, eh?  Well, here's one more thing a C# iterator can do that a traditional "return a new collection" transformation can't!   It can return **unbounded** collections!   I know, I know, that smells a lot like an infinite loop, eh?  Yes and no.  Basically, you're relying on the caller to put the bounds on the list, and as long as the caller doesn't you keep going.  Consider this example:   public static class Fibonacci {     // returns the infinite fibonacci sequence     public static IEnumerable<int> Sequence()     {         int iteration = 0;         int first = 1;         int second = 1;         int current = 0;         while (true)         {             if (iteration++ < 2)             {                 current = 1;             }             else             {                 current = first + second;                 second = first;                 first = current;             }             yield return current;         }     } }   Whoa, you say!  Yes, that's an infinite loop!  What the heck is going on there?  Yes, that was intentional.  Would it be better to have a fibonacci sequence that returns only a specific number of items?  Perhaps, but that wouldn't give you the power to defer the execution to the caller.   The beauty of this function is it is as infinite as the sequence itself!  The fibonacci sequence is unbounded, and so is this method.  It will continue to return fibonacci numbers for as long as you ask for them.  Now that's not something you can do with a traditional method that would return a collection of ints representing each number.  In that case you would eventually run out of memory as you got to higher and higher numbers.  This method, though, never runs out of memory.   Now, that said, you do have to know when you use it that it is an infinite collection and bound it appropriately.  Fortunately, Linq provides a lot of these extension methods for you!   Let's say you only want the first 10 fibonacci numbers:       foreach(var fib in Fibonacci.Sequence().Take(10))     {         Console.WriteLine(fib);     }   Or let's say you only want the fibonacci numbers that are less than 100:       foreach(var fib in Fibonacci.Sequence().TakeWhile(f => f < 100))     {         Console.WriteLine(fib);     }   So, you see, one of the nice things about iterators is their power to work with virtually any size (even infinite) collections without adding the garbage collection overhead of making new collections.    You can also do fun things like this to make a more "fluent" interface for for loops:   // A set of integer generator extension methods public static class IntExtensions {     // Begins counting to inifity, use To() to range this.     public static IEnumerable<int> Every(this int start)     {         // deliberately avoiding condition because keeps going         // to infinity for as long as values are pulled.         for (var i = start; ; ++i)         {             yield return i;         }     }     // Begins counting to infinity by the given step value, use To() to     public static IEnumerable<int> Every(this int start, int byEvery)     {         // deliberately avoiding condition because keeps going         // to infinity for as long as values are pulled.         for (var i = start; ; i += byEvery)         {             yield return i;         }     }     // Begins counting to inifity, use To() to range this.     public static IEnumerable<int> To(this int start, int end)     {         for (var i = start; i <= end; ++i)         {             yield return i;         }     }     // Ranges the count by specifying the upper range of the count.     public static IEnumerable<int> To(this IEnumerable<int> collection, int end)     {         return collection.TakeWhile(item => item <= end);     } }   Note that there are two versions of each method.  One that starts with an int and one that starts with an IEnumerable<int>.  This is to allow more power in chaining from either an existing collection or from an int.  This lets you do things like:   // count from 1 to 30 foreach(var i in 1.To(30)) {     Console.WriteLine(i); }     // count from 1 to 10 by 2s foreach(var i in 0.Every(2).To(10)) {     Console.WriteLine(i); }     // or, if you want an infinite sequence counting by 5s until something inside breaks you out... foreach(var i in 0.Every(5)) {     if (someCondition)     {         break;     }     ... }     Yes, those are kinda play functions and not particularly useful, but they show some of the power of generators and extension methods to form a fluid interface.   So what do you think?  What are some of your favorite generators and iterators?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >