Search Results

Search found 2823 results on 113 pages for 'perforce branch spec'.

Page 62/113 | < Previous Page | 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69  | Next Page >

  • Code Coverage Analysis for Embedded C++ projects

    - by Steve Hawkins
    I have recently started working on a very large C++ project that, after completing 90% of the implementation, has determined that they need to demonstrate 100% branch coverage during testing. The project is hosted on an embedded platform (Green Hills Integrity). I'm looking for suggestions and experiences from others on StackOverflow that have used code coverage products in similar environments. I'm interested in both positive and negative comments regarding these types of tools.

    Read the article

  • Is there a Netbeans equivalent to Eclipse's Workspace

    - by Mike Cornell
    I enjoy using Netbeans, especially for development with Maven, however, I've found recently that I've been working with three different branches of the same code base in different parts of the development cycle. One of the things that Eclipse can do, is separate the projects into different workspaces, so i can simply start Eclipse with the workspace containing my Maven projects in the production patch branch or the trunk depending upon what I need to be working on. I'd love to accomplish this in Netbeans, but haven't found a way to do so. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • What is Logically and semantically correct, A-grade browsers compatible and W3C valid way to clear f

    - by metal-gear-solid
    What is Logically correct and W3C valid way to clear float? zoom:1 is not valid by W3C and IE8 don't have hash layout problem overflow:hidden and overflow:hidden were not made to do this,as the spec intended overflow to be used <div class="clear"/> is not semantically correct and i don't want to add extra markup. clearfix hack generates content that really hasn’t any semantic value. I've asked many questions and read many articles on this issue but haven't find best way.

    Read the article

  • Excluding a folder from autotesting

    - by gmile
    I've just installed a ZenTest to use autotest in my project. I use rspec and have an integration folder inside it. As I don't want all my integration tests run every single time I start autospec , so I'd like to somehow restrict autospec from running tests in that folder. How do I exclude a chosen folder inside a /spec from running by autotest?

    Read the article

  • Trimming GIT Checkins/Squashing GIT History

    - by yar
    I check my code into a GIT branch every few minutes or so, and the comments end up being things like "Everything broken starting again" and other absurdities. Then every few minutes/hours/days I do a serious checkin with a real comment like, "Fixed bug #22.55, 3rd time." How can I separate these two concepts? I would like to be able to remove all my frequent-checkins and just leave the serious ones.

    Read the article

  • C++ thread to separate process

    - by silverbandit91
    Is there any way I can have a thread branch off into its own independent process? I know there's the CreateProcess function but as far as I can tell, you can only run external applications with it. Is what I'm asking for at all possible?

    Read the article

  • Why is the order of evaluation for function parameters undefined in c++?

    - by kunj2aan
    The standard doesn't specify the order of evaluation of arguments with this line: The order of evaluation of arguments is unspecified. What does Better code can be generated in the absence of restrictions on expression evaluation order imply? What is the drawback in asking all the compilers to evaluate the function arguments Left to Right for example? What kinds of optimizations do compilers perform because of this undefined spec?

    Read the article

  • How to create a subject helper method in Rspec2

    - by Hedgehog
    In rpsec 2.12 I expected this helper method definition to work: module X private def build_them(type) puts 'Catching the star' end end context 'public/private instance methods' do subject{ Class.new { extend(::X) } } def subject.build(type) puts "Throwing a star" build_them(type) end it{ should respond_to :build} end The actual result is a failed spec: expected #<Class:0x00000002ea5f90> to respond to :build I expected the example to pass Any suggestions on how to do this correctly?

    Read the article

  • In Rails, how do you functional test a Javascript response format?

    - by Teflon Ted
    If your controller action looks like this: respond_to do |format| format.html { raise 'Unsupported' } format.js # index.js.erb end and your functional test looks like this: test "javascript response..." do get :index end it will execute the HTML branch of the respond_to block. If you try this: test "javascript response..." do get 'index.js' end it executes the view (index.js.erb) withOUT running the controller action!

    Read the article

  • Creating Synch Point In TFS Source Tree Development Cycle

    - by Rob G
    Our development cycle rarely requires a branch so we have what tfs appears to consider a single, never-ending development cycle. Our problem is that each build includes an ever increasing long "Generating list of changesets and updating work items" step that includes all changesets/work items back to day 1. What is the proper step that we need to perform to formally lock and label (wrong terms I'm sure) the source tree so that a new cycle of changesets and work items can begin. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • i = true and false in Ruby is true?

    - by alex
    Am I fundamentally misunderstanding Ruby here? I've been writing Ruby code for about 2 years now and just today stumbled on this... ruby-1.8.7-p249 > i = true and false => false ruby-1.8.7-p249 > i => true Could somebody explain what's going on here please? I'm sure it's to spec, but it just seems counter intuitive to me...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69  | Next Page >