Search Results

Search found 31578 results on 1264 pages for 'javascript functions'.

Page 649/1264 | < Previous Page | 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656  | Next Page >

  • jQuery infinite loop w/ tablesorter

    - by Wells
    Got myself in a funny situation: page has three tables. Using sortEnd, any time you sort one table, it sorts the other three. However, since I bound sortEnd to the function that does the sorting, you get a infinite loop of sorting/resorting. It looks like: $("table.tablesorter").tablesorter({widgets: ['zebra']}).bind("sortEnd", function() { $(this).find("th.headerSortDown,.headerSortUp").each(function(i) { index = $(this).attr("cellIndex"); order = ($(this).is(".headerSortDown")) ? 1 : 0; $("table.tablesorter").tablesorter({sortList: [[index,order]]}); }); }); Any tips on how to clean this up?

    Read the article

  • How to refresh a frame .net

    - by Geetha
    Hi All, I am using two frames to display pages. The page url is given in codebehind. But it is not reflecting. If i click f5 its grtting reflected. Needs: How to refresh a frame after setting the src value in the code behind. code: topFrame.Attributes["src"] = "MainPage.aspx"; Geetha.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to have a variadic function in C with no non-variadic parameter?

    - by Tim
    I have the following function: void doStuff(int unusedParameter, ...) { va_list params; va_start(params, unusedParameter); /* ... */ va_end(params); } As part of a refactor, I'd like to remove the unused parameter without otherwise changing the implementation of the function. As far as I can tell, it's impossible to use va_start when you don't have a last non-variadic parameter to refer to. Is there any way around this? Background: It is in fact a C++ program, so I could use some operator-overloading magic as suggested here, but I was hoping not to have to change the interface at this point. The existing function does its work by requiring that the variable argument list be null-terminated, and scanning for the NULL, therefore it doesn't need a leading argument to tell it how many arguments it has.

    Read the article

  • Recommended lightweight jQuery lightbox plug-in?

    - by Mat Harden
    I need a lightbox plugin that is styled similar to FancyBox but will allow me to add text to the same white background as the image. Lightweight because I don't want many features as it's going to be added to an already heavy JS page. Preferably without Ajax features as I'll be handling this myself. Therefore I'm ruling out the use of Thickbox, Fancybox and jQuery UI. Basically I want the plugin to be a currently supported light-box jQuery plug-in that handles all the cross browser styling issues which I can then customise.

    Read the article

  • Setting a cookie based on the name of the link that is clicked.

    - by Ozaki
    TLDR When clicking on a link I want to assign a cookie with a name of instrument and a value of the text on the link clicked. Using Jquery.1.4.2.min.js, Jquery.cookie.1.0.js I am trying to create a cookie when a link is clicked (will always link to "page.html"). name of instrument value of the TEXT So far I am trying to use: Link1: <a href="page.html">link1</a> Link2: <a href="page.html">link2</a> Script: $('a[href=page.html]').click(function() { var name = 'instrument'; var value = $(this).text(); $.cookie(name, value, { expires: 365 }); }); When I click the link it just loads the link and no cookie is set. Debugging with firebug, firecookie, firequery. No cookie for instrument or anything along the lines is found. Onload I'll hit the "<a href="page.html">projects</a>" but not the "$.cookie(name, value, { expires: 365 });" at all.

    Read the article

  • Retrieivng coordinates in this page

    - by hao
    Hey guys, Im trying to do some data mining and analyze data based on locations. For this site, http://www.dianping.com/shop/1898365 I am trying to figure out whats the latitude and longitude by crawling. But I cant seem to figure out where this information is stored. Can someone give me some pointers

    Read the article

  • Are AJAX calls to a sub-domain considered Cross Site Scripting?

    - by AaronPresley
    I have Server A (www.example.com) sending information to Server B. I can only have HTML / JS on Server A (and have to do the "crunching" on Server B) so I'm trying to send form data via AJAX (trying to avoid a form post to Server B - don't ask). Obviously doing an AJAX call cross-domain is considered XSS and a big no-no, but if I were to put Server B in a subdomain (sub.example.com), would that be considered okay? How are cross-domain errors detected? Does the browser look up DNS records? IP address? Thanks in advance for you help.

    Read the article

  • How to add on to an existing onclick event?

    - by Corey Sarnia
    I'm currently writing a Greasemonkey script for a page, so I can't modify the script myself. There is a form submit button on the page. When you click this button, it executes some fancy AJAX calls and such to update the page and do serverside things. What I'm trying to is basically set a "lastClick" value when the button is clicked. I want to add the code GM_setValue("lastClicked", (new Date()).getTime().toString()) to store the last time the button was clicked (for future uses of the script, it will actually do something with this date). How exactly can I accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • Dynamic creation of a pointer function in c++

    - by Liberalkid
    I was working on my advanced calculus homework today and we're doing some iteration methods along the lines of newton's method to find solutions to things like x^2=2. It got me thinking that I could write a function that would take two function pointers, one to the function itself and one to the derivative and automate the process. This wouldn't be too challenging, then I started thinking could I have the user input a function and parse that input (yes I can do that). But can I then dynamically create a pointer to a one-variable function in c++. For instance if x^2+x, can I make a function double function(double x){ return x*x+x;} during run-time. Is this remotely feasible, or is it along the lines of self-modifying code?

    Read the article

  • Why exactly is server side HTML rendering faster than client side?

    - by mvbl fst
    I am working on a large web site, and we're moving a lot of functionality to the client side (Require.js, Backbone and Handlebars stack). There are even discussions about possibly moving all rendering to the client side. But reading some articles, especially ones about Twitter moving away from client side rendering, which mention that server side is faster / more reliable, I begin to have questions. I don't understand how rendering fairly simple HTML widgets in JS from JSON and templates is a contemporary browser on a dual core CPU with 4-8 GB RAM is any slower than making dozens of includes in your server side app. Are there any actual real life benchmarking figures regarding this? Also, it seems like parsing HTML templates by server side templating engines can't be any faster than rendering same HTML code from a Handlebars template, especially if this is a precomp JS function?

    Read the article

  • Remove Class on input cheched not working

    - by Manna
    I have set that if the Input checkbox is checked the opacity turn from 0.5 to 1. It'not working, it actually works if i do the opposite, but this is not my goal! My CSS code .opacitychange {opacity: 1;} #total {opacity: 0.5} and if($("#iva").is(':checked')) { $('#total').html('+' + vat); total += vat; $('#total').addClass("opacitychange"); } else $('#total').html('0.00').removeClass("opacitychange"); if($("#irpef").is(':checked')) { $('#total1').html('-' + irpf); total -= irpf; $('#total1').addClass("opacitychange"); } else $('#total1').html('0.00').removeClass("opacitychange"); $("#total2").html(total.toFixed(2)); }; What's wrong? Here the case

    Read the article

  • Image visualization with canvas. How to resize them?

    - by Luca Matteis
    I'm building a website photo gallery for a friend. Images are loaded as simple DOM image objects (<img src="" />), and the size of these images is based on the browser size. So I resize them with CSS. This isn't an optimal solution since CSS resizing seems to change the quality of the image and pixelate it quite a bit. I was thinking of rendering the image with canvas and then resize it with that so that the quality remains effective, but I can't find any info about this online. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Isotope.js help: Changing item image after sorting

    - by user3643081
    This is a general question on how to go about building a project I have in mind, and the best way to set off on the right foot. I am fairly new to JS, please be gentle. I want to use isotope.js (or a similar script) to display a page with multiple items (about 30 different plants found in a garden) and the ability to sort them by seasons of the year + "what is most beautiful now" + and "view all" (a total of 6 categories) . On load, or when sorted by either "what is beautiful now" or "view all", I need each item to reflect the image of the current season we are in. When sorted by season, I need those "current" images to switch over to a designated seasonal image of that plant. Therefore, each sortable item will ultimately have 4 different versions with 4 different images in the background ready to surface when plants are sorted. (perhaps 5 if it makes more sense to have a "current" version besides the 4 seasonal versions.) My question: what approach can I take to achieve this effect in a manageable way? Can isotope apply a class to items sorted? Assuming it can: Should each item have 4 inline images, each with a css class, that I then control by using display:inline; and display:none; properties from my stylesheets? (I worry that this approach would significantly increase load times) Would it make more sense to create a blank dummy div who's background I control similarly to the example above -relying mostly on CSS. Or is there some other way involving JS I am overlooking? Any help would be appreciated. Examples of what you suggest would be immensely helpful.

    Read the article

  • Concatenate an each loop inside another

    - by Lothar
    I want to to concatenate the results of a jquery each loop inside of another but am not getting the results I expect. $.each(data, function () { counter++; var i = 0; var singlebar; var that = this; tableRow = '<tr>' + '<td>' + this.foo + '</td>' + $.each(this.bar, function(){ singlebar = '<td>' + that.bar[i].baz + '</td>'; tableRow + singlebar; }); '</tr>'; return tableRow; }); The portion inside the nested each does not get added to the string that is returned. I can console.log(singlebar) and get the expected results in the console but I cannot concatenate those results inside the primary each loop. I have also tried: $.each(this.bar, function(){ tableRow += '<td>' + that.bar[i].baz + '</td>'; }); Which also does not add the desired content. How do I iterate over this nested data and add it in the midst of the table that the primary each statement is building?

    Read the article

  • Canvas - @font-face doesn't work on IE9+

    - by iMoses
    I've created a widget which allows the user to locate free-text over an image using a textarea. When saving the image a background canvas application reads the text and calculates its position, then it draws the text to the canvas over the image and saves a new image file. The font I use for this widget is league-gothic which I am importing using the @font-face method. This seems to work great and without any issues on all browsers except (of-course) for IE9 and IE10. When using internet explorer you can clearly see that the font was indeed loaded since the textarea uses the same font, but when trying to draw the text onto the canvas the font-family reverts to one of its fallback, in this case Arial. I've searched quite a bit and found nothing. Unlike most font issues I found that concern the canvas element, I am completely sure that the font has indeed loaded as I am viewing it before saving the result. Anything at all will help me at the moment. If you have any insight, experience with similar bugs or whatever, please share :) Thanks in advance. P.S. I can't expose a code example at the moment, but if it becomes a problem I'll do my best to provide one.

    Read the article

  • innerHTML within another tag

    - by jimbo
    Hi all, I have a link: <a id="nextBut" href="somelink" class="button"><span>Next Step</span></a> And I can control the the <span>Next step</span> part with innerHTML but how could I leave the <span> alone and just change the 'Next step' part? For example: var NextButJar = document.getElementById('nextBut'); NextButJar.disabled = true; NextButJar.style.opacity = .5; NextButJar.span.innerHTML = 'Read all tabs to continue'; I also have: NextButJar.onClick = handleClick; function handleClick(){ if (this.disabled == true) { alert("Please view all tabs first!"); return; } else { alert("allowed to run"); } }; Which I can't seem to get working either...

    Read the article

  • jQuery overlay not working in IE6, Opera

    - by Wild Thing
    Hi, I've been scratching my head for hours trying to figure this out. I have this page: http://173.203.72.190/default.aspx. On clicking 'Any Cuisine', a sort of overlay is supposed to open. It works fine in nearly all browsers except IE6 and Opera. In IE6 and Opera, the jQuery 'overlay' won't open. Anybody have any ideas why this might be?

    Read the article

  • jQuery.getJSON: how to avoid requesting the json-file on every refresh? (caching)

    - by Mr. Bombastic
    in this example you can see a generated HTML-list. On every refresh the script requests the data-file (ajax/test.json) and builds the list again. The generated file "ajax/test.json" is cached statically. But how can I avoid requesting this file on every refresh? // source: jquery.com $.getJSON('ajax/test.json', function(data) { var items = []; $.each(data, function(key, val) { items.push('<li id="' + key + '">' + val + '</li>'); }); $('<ul/>', { 'class': 'my-new-list', html: items. }).appendTo('body'); }); This doesn't work: list_data = $.cookie("list_data"); if (list_data == undefined || list_data == "") { $.getJSON('ajax/test.json', function(data) { list_data = data; }); } var items = []; $.each(data, function(key, val) { items.push('<li id="' + key + '">' + val + '</li>'); }); $('<ul/>', { 'class': 'my-new-list', html: items. }).appendTo('body'); Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Initiate a Post request from a form with paylod in the Body request

    - by Martin Böschen
    I have the following problem. I have a webservice, which accepts a post request with some json data in the request body and which also returns Json data. Now I want to build a user friendly HTML page to test this service. I have a form to fill in data, when the user clicks the button, the JSON should be build from the form data and POSTed to my webservice, the response should be displayed to the user. How do I achieve that?

    Read the article

  • How to hide an element after $compile?

    - by Miron
    How to hide directive generated html after inserting it to body? Directive has "replace" set to trueThere is a directive: .directive('location', function () { return { restrict : 'A', scope : {}, replace : true, templateUrl: 'common/components/location/location.html', link : function (scope, element, attr) {……} } }); So it is used in another directive: var scope = $rootScope.$new(true); var directive = $compile('<div location></div>')(scope); $document.find('body').append(directive); directive.hide(); - not working How to hide directive generated html after inserting it to body? Directive has "replace" set to true

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656  | Next Page >