Search Results

Search found 37654 results on 1507 pages for 'function prototypes'.

Page 652/1507 | < Previous Page | 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659  | Next Page >

  • Jquery ajax call with '+' sign.

    - by 0plus1
    Hi, I'm doing this: $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: baseURL+"sys/formTipi_azioni",data:"az_tipo="+azione, beforeSend: function(){$("#form").html('<p><img src="'+baseURL+'lib/img/ajax-loader.gif" width="16" height="16" alt="loading" /><p>');}, success: function(html){$("#form").html(html);} }); there is a case when azione is TB+ the plus sign doesn't get POSTed at all, a blank space get sent. I already tried this: azione = escape(String(azione)); With no luck. Does anybody knows how to fix this? Thank you

    Read the article

  • php class basic question

    - by Ross
    hi <?php class myClass { var $input; var $output; function myClass($input) { $output = 'You entered: ' . $input; return $output; } } $test = new myClass; echo $test->myClass(123); ?> this works, but returns this warning: Warning: Missing argument 1 for myClass::myClass() I read in to this, and seems that the constructor is expecting a value, so by adding: function myClass($input='') the warning is removed, but this seems so unnecessary? could someone enlighten me as to why it's required to define a value to prevent that warning? thanks for any pointers

    Read the article

  • jQuery - how to pass $(this) as an object?

    - by regan
    Hello! I'm trying to pass an object into a function but think there's a problem with $(this) not actually being valid at the point of passing it in. $('textarea#quote').live('bind',function(){ }).limit('10',$(this).parents('form').children().find('span#qc') ); The second parameter can be either a string or an object like $('span#qc'), but I also want to be able to pass in an object which references the current one. Why? Because I have several forms on same page, each containing textarea#quote, so depending on which form is selected I want to be able to reference a particular element within the same form. Anyone??

    Read the article

  • Javascript get li values and encode them

    - by bluedaniel
    At the moment I have two (maybe more) unordered lists which are sortable with jquery and ui. The things that work are that the lists are connected, items are draggable, items can be removed and a form that adds to the list. What I need however is a function that gets all the content for li items and json encode them ready to be sent off to some db function, or something. Im new to jquery however and cant find documentation for li items. Hope Ive explained this well. Daniel

    Read the article

  • Limit text area value and cut the rest

    - by streetparade
    I have a textarea which users can enter some tags. I need to limit this tags to 20 tags. Tags could be enterer this way maytag1,mytag2,mytag3 What i wrote is this function function limitTags() { var tags = $("input[type=text][name=tags]").val() var tag = $.trim(tags); var selected = new Array(); /** * replace the last ',' */ if(tag.substring(tag.length - 1) == ",") { *///tag = tag.replace(tag.length - 1, ''); } var enteredTags = tag.split(","); if( enteredTags.length > 20 ) { //$("input[type=text][name=tags]").val(enteredTags.join(",", enteredTags)); alert("Only 20 Tags allowed"); } } The alert works just fine but, after the alert box is gone. i can continiue entering tags till the alert box appears. What i need is cut the text after the messagebox which was entered also the last "," I hope i could ask my question clear. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Dynamic validation in jquery

    - by mansoor
    $(document).ready(function(){ $('a[rel=addhint]').click(function(){ var html='<div><label>Hint</label>'; html+='<span class="input"><input type="text" size="30" class="text" name="hint"/><a href="#" rel="delhint">delete</a></span><br class="clear" /></div>'; $('div#hintTextContainer').append(html); bindDelHintAll(); return false; }); I want when a new text area include vadition of required field and max length will also apply on it.

    Read the article

  • Row/column counter in 'apply' functions

    - by mortalitysequence
    What if one wants to apply a functon i.e. to each row of a matrix, but also wants to use as an argument for this function the number of that row. As an example, suppose you wanted to get the n-th root of the numbers in each row of a matrix, where n is the row number. Is there another way (using apply only) than column-binding the row numbers to the initial matrix, like this? test <- data.frame(x=c(26,21,20),y=c(34,29,28)) t(apply(cbind(as.numeric(rownames(test)),test),1,function(x) x[2:3]^(1/x[1]))) P.S. Actually if test was really a matrix : test <- matrix(c(26,21,20,34,29,28),nrow=3) , rownames(test) doesn't help :( Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Override default javascript functionality with jQuery

    - by deth4uall
    I am trying to overwrite a JavaScript on change event in the below code with jQuery however I believe that the inline JavaScript is taking priority over the jQuery functionality declared. Essentially I am trying to have an AJAX version of my site which includes an additional JavaScript file. I need this functionality to still work without the additional AJAX version, but I am not sure as to whether I should include it in the main JavaScript file or leave it inline like it is right now. Any suggestions and information regarding them would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! <form action="/cityhall/villages/" method="post" name="submit_village"> <select name="village" onchange="document.submit_village.submit();"> <option value=""></option> </select> </form> I am trying to use the jQuery Form Plugin to submit the posts to the PHP to handle the requests as follows: var bank_load_options = { target: '#content', beforeSubmit: showRequest, success: showResponse }; $('form.get_pages').livequery(function(){ $(this).ajaxForm(bank_load_options); return false; }); I modified the code as following: <form action="/cityhall/villages/" method="post" id="submit_village" name="submit_village"> <select name="village" class="get_pages" rel="submit_village"> <option value=""></option> </select> </form> <script> # main JavaScript $('.get_pages').live('change',function(e){ var submit_page = $(this).attr('rel'); $("#"+submit_page).submit(); }); # ajax JavaScript var bank_load_options = { target: '#content', beforeSubmit: showRequest, success: showResponse }; $('.get_pages').live('change',function(){ var submit_page = $(this).attr('rel'); $("#"+submit_page).ajaxForm(get_pages_load_options); return false; }); </script> However now it only runs every other option when I change it.

    Read the article

  • how does memory stacks work in javascript

    - by user227353
    When we have code like: function a(){ var x =0; this.add=function(){ alert(x++); } } var test = new a(); test.add(); // alert 0 test.add(); // alert 1 test.add(); // alert 2 How does this work? Doesn't that the value of 'x' in a() should be 'gone' as soon as test = new a() is complete? The stack contains x should also be gone as well, right? Or, does javascript always keep all the stacks ever created in case they will be referenced in future? But that wouldn't be nice, would it...?

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter - Is it ok to add functionality to the constructor in controllers?

    - by Irro
    I'm making a project where I want the user to search for shops in different cities and would like the url to be like this: domain/shop/city/name. So I created a controller in codeigniter called Shop. But I cant create a city function since the city part of the url changes dependent on city name. One easy way to do it would be to add a function called "search" and add the functionality there but then I get url's like: domain/shop/search/city/name which I really would like to avoid. So my question is if it's ok to add my functionality directly into the constructor to avoid that extra "search" part in the url? I'm afraid that there might be some performance tricks involved that potentially keeps the class in memory so the constructor will not be called every time.

    Read the article

  • How should I organize my C# classes? [closed]

    - by oscar.fimbres
    I'm creating an email generator system. I'm creating some clases and I'm trying to make things right. By the time, I have created 5 classes. Look at the class diagram: I'm going to explain you each one. Person. It's not a big deal. Just have two constructors: Person(fname, lname1, lname2) and Person(token, fname, lname1, lname2). Note that email property stays without value. StringGenerator. This is a static class and it has only a public function: Generate. The function receives a Person class and it will return a list of patterns for the email. MySql. It contains all the necessary to connect to a database. Database. This class inherits from MySql class. It has particular functions for the database. This gets all the registries from a table (function GetPeople) and return a List. Each person from the list contains all data except Email. Also it can add records (List but this must contains an available email). An available email is when an email doesn't have another person. For that reason, I have a method named ExistsEmail. Container. This is the class which is causing me some problems. It's like a temporary container. It supposed to have a people list from GetPeople (in Database class) and for each person it adds, it must generate a list of possible names (StringGenerator.Generate), then it selects one of the list and it must check out if exists in the database or in the same container. As I told above this is temporal, it may none of the possible emails is available. So the user can modify or enter a custom email available and update the list in this container. When all the email's people are available, it sends a list to add in the database, It must have a Flush method, to insert all the people in the database. I'm trying to design correct class. I need a little help to improve or edite the classes, because I want to separate the logic and visual, and learn of you. I hope you've been able to understand me. Any question or doubt, please let me know. Anyway, I attached the solution here to better understand it: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D94FH8GZ

    Read the article

  • jQuery: use filter(), but work with both results

    - by Tomalak
    In jQuery, filter() reduces your result to those elements that fulfill a certain condition. This splits the list in two parts. Working with the "good half" of the elements is easy: $("some selector").filter(function() { // determine result... return result; }).each( /* do something */ ); But how can I work with the "other half" of my elements, too - but without doing the equivalent of this: $("some selector").filter(function() { // determine result... return !result; }).each( /* do something */ ); Basically, I'd like to feed two separate /* do something */ parts to a single filter. One for those that match, and one for the others - without having to select and filter twice.

    Read the article

  • jquery update div as text input is modified

    - by Piero
    Hi, So I have this text input in a form, and I want to update a div as the user types text in the text input. <p><label for="movie_name">Film: </label> <input type="text" name="movie_name" class="required" onkeydown="changediv2(this.value)" /></p> <p><div id="ajax_update"></div></p> My js method: function changediv2(str) { $('#ajax_update').html(geturl('http://url/search/movie?query='+str)); } If I type in a browser http://url/search/movie?query=someString, I get some html displayed. But when I call it via this ajax call, nothing happens... My geturl method: function geturl(addr) { var r = $.ajax({ type: 'GET', url: addr, async: false }).responseText; return r; } I cannot see what is wrong in there... Please help me! :)

    Read the article

  • C++: namespace conflicht between extern "C" and class member

    - by plaisthos
    Hi, I stumbled upon a rather exotic c++ namespace problem: condensed example: extern "C" { void solve(lprec * lp); } class A { public: lprec * lp; void solve(int foo); } void A::solve(int foo) { solve(lp); } I want to call the c funcition solve in my C++ member function A::solve. The compiler is not happy with my intents: error C2664: 'lp_solve_ilp::solve' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'lprec *' to 'int' Is there something I can prefix the solve function? C::solve does not work

    Read the article

  • C#: Label contains no text

    - by Vinzcent
    Hey I would like to get the text out of a label. But the label text is set with Javascript. On the page I can see that there is text in the label, but when I debug it shows this: "". So how do I get the text out of a label that is set with Javascript, at least that is what I think is the problem. My code: <asp:TextBox ID="txtCount" runat="server" Width="50px" Font-Names="Georgia, Arial, sans-Serif" ForeColor="#444444"></asp:TextBox> <ajaxToolkit:NumericUpDownExtender ID="NumericUpDownExtender1" runat="server" Minimum="1" TargetButtonDownID="btnDown" TargetButtonUpID="btnUp" TargetControlID="txtCount" Width="20" /> <asp:ImageButton ID="btnUp" runat="server" AlternateText="up" ImageUrl="Images/arrowUp.png" OnClientClick="setAmountUp()" ImageAlign="Top" CausesValidation="False" /> <asp:ImageButton ID="btnDown" runat="server" AlternateText="down" ImageUrl="Images/arrowDown.png" OnClientClick="setAmountDown()" ImageAlign="Bottom" CausesValidation="False" /> <asp:Label ID="lblKorting" runat="server" /> <asp:Label ID="lblAmount" runat="server" /> <asp:Button ID="btnBestel" runat="server" CssClass="btn" Text="Bestel" OnClick="btnBestel_Click1" /> JS function setAmountUp() { var aantal = document.getElementById('<%=txtCount.ClientID%>').value-0; aantal+=1; calculateAmount(aantal); } function setAmountDown() { var aantal = document.getElementById('<%=txtCount.ClientID%>').value-0; if(aantal > 1) aantal -=1; calculateAmount(aantal); } function calculateAmount(aantal) { var prijs = document.getElementById('<%=lblPriceBestel.ClientID%>').innerHTML -0; var totaal = 0; if(aantal < 2) { totaal = prijs * aantal; document.getElementById('<%=lblKorting.ClientID%>').innerHTML = ""; } else if(aantal >= 2 && aantal < 5) { totaal = (prijs * aantal)*0.95; document.getElementById('<%=lblKorting.ClientID%>').innerHTML = "-5%"; } else if(aantal >= 5) { totaal = (prijs * aantal)*0.90; document.getElementById('<%=lblKorting.ClientID%>').innerHTML = "-10%"; } document.getElementById('<%=lblAmount.ClientID%>').innerHTML = totaal; } C# private OrderBO bestelling; protected void btnBestel_Click1(object sender, EventArgs e) { bestelling = new OrderBO(); bestelling.Amount = Convert.ToInt32(lblAmount.Text); //<--- THIS IS "" in the debugger, but on the page 10 }

    Read the article

  • Stop jQuery animations stacking

    - by Chris
    I have an Options box that hovers in the top right of the webpage. It's opacity is set to 10% so as not to be obstructive to users. When they hover over (mouseenter) it I use jQuery to fade it in and slidedown the content (and the reverse on mouseout). If they do this repeatedly though the animation stacks up and you can sometimes be left in a situation where your mouse is stood still but the box is yo-yoing around. How can I get around this situation? Here is how I currently setup the animations $("#dropdown").mouseenter(function() { $(this).fadeTo('fast',1); $("#options").slideDown(); }); $("#dropdown").mouseleave(function() { $(this).fadeTo('fast',0.1); $("#options").slideUp(); }); Note I am using jQuery only and not any other plugins.

    Read the article

  • Chrome Extension - Dynamic Right-Click Menu

    - by user1277607
    I am trying to create an option in the right-click menu that is dynamic based on the user's action. If the user selects some text, then right-clicks, the option will say "Display It". If the user right-clicks without selecting some text, the option will say "Select Some Text First" and be grayed out. I am wondering how do I achieve this? I currently have it so that the option will appear only when the user has selected some text. I am unsure how to modify it to meet my second requirements. chrome.contextMenus.create ({ title:"Display It!", contexts:["selection"], onclick:function(info,tab) { chrome.tabs.sendRequest( tab.id, {callFunction: "displaySidebar", info: info}, function(response) {console.log(response);} ); } });

    Read the article

  • Prevent auto scrolling when clicking tab anchor

    - by JohnCrossy
    On my page I have some tabs that I've added some javascript so when they're clicked the page loads the tab's anchor URL instead of simply changing the view with AJAX, but I now want to stop the browser from auto scrolling to the anchor location. Having done some research, I'm pretty sure I just need to add a couple of lines so that when clicked it returns false or prevents default but, being a noob, I've no idea where to put them!?! I know it's cheeky, but if any answers could include the full script (ie. the below) with the solution, that way I'll understand better and hopefully learn some valuable lessons also :) Here's the code I'm using: jQuery( function() { jQuery('.ui-tabs').bind( 'tabsselect', function( e, ui ) { window.location.hash = ui.tab.hash }); });

    Read the article

  • Using jQuery to make a group of images appear in order.

    - by Sean Johnson
    I have a page that shows a bunch of thumbnails (around 30), and the client is wanting them to appear one by one, in order, going from left to right on the page. This is what I've tried: var start_opacity = 500; $j('.grid-photo').each(function(i) { start_opacity = start_opacity + 500; setTimeout(function() { $j(i).animate({opacity: 1}, 4000); }, start_opacity); }); It doesn't seem to know what i is referencing. Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • How to retrieve the real height of a #div (including overflowed parts)

    - by Toni Michel Caubet
    The same way i use this to detect when user scolled down the whole page: $(window).scroll(function(){ var diff = $(window).scrollTop() + $(window).height() - $(document).height(); if ($(window).scrollTop() == $(document).height() - $(window).height() || (diff < 5 && diff > -5)){ console.log('yay!'); } }); I wanted to do the same inside a dialog, I am trying like this: $('#dialog').dialog(); $('#dialog').scroll(function(){ var scroll = $('#dialog').scrollTop(); var height = $('#dialog ul').outerHeight(true); if(scroll == height){ $('#dialog').css('background','#999'); }else{ console.log('scrolltop is '+scroll+' and height is: '+height); } }) DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/AgFXz/ The problem i guess is that i am not retrieving the whole #dialog size but the visible (CSS Defined property) size.. How can i know when user scrolled till the end of the dialog's scroll? Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • how ca i make Description panel to pause after it is shown on the slideshow?

    - by ershad
    I am new to Javascript. I have a slide show with images fading and description coming from left to right. I need to pause the description panel for some sec. How can i do that? The code is: showhidedescpanel:function(state, animateduration){ var setting=this.setting var endpoint=(state=="show")? setting.dimensions[1]-setting.panelwidth : this.setting.dimensions[1]-410 setting.$descpanel.stop().animate({left:endpoint}, (2000), function(){ if (setting.descreveal=="always" && state=="hide") setting.$restorebutton.css({visibility:'visible'}) //show restore button }) }

    Read the article

  • Appending target="_blank" to links in an iframe without using <body onload>

    - by CincauHangus
    I'm trying to change the links in an iframe to load in a new window instead of the iframe itself. Currently I use this code in head: $(document).ready(function() { var oIFrame = document.getElementById("iframeID"); var oDoc = (oIFrame.contentWindow || oIFrame.contentDocument); if(oDoc.document) oDoc = oDoc.document; var links = oDoc.getElementsByTagName("a"); for(var i=0; i<links.length; i++) { links[i].target="_blank"; } }); However, the code above is triggered before the iframe is fully loaded with its contents. I know this code would work if it's triggered in the body onload attribute, but I'd like to avoid that method and implement it in a function or a file instead.

    Read the article

  • jQueryUI dialog won't go modal

    - by Theopile
    I need a modal dialog to open ontop of an tinyMCE editor and other jQuerified items. I followed the jquery site but its not modal, I can still change and access the rest of the page. $('#sureDelete').dialog({ modal: true, buttons: { "Yes": function(){ $('li#'+$id).remove(); }, "No":function(){ } }, draggable: false }); <div id="dialogs"> <div id="sureDelete">Are you sure you want to delete this page?</div> </div>

    Read the article

  • Highlight changes?

    - by Nimbuz
    HTML: <html> <body> <textarea>Original Text</textarea> <button>Replace</button> </body> </html>?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? jQuery: $(function() { $('button').click(function () { $('body').html($('body').html().replace('Original','New')); }); }); ? http://jsfiddle.net/r7MgY/ Can I highlight changes somehow with a fading yellow background maybe? Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659  | Next Page >