Search Results

Search found 13676 results on 548 pages for 'box shadow'.

Page 66/548 | < Previous Page | 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73  | Next Page >

  • IP KVM switch, or serial console box for remote admin?

    - by grahzny
    We have a small server farm (11 now, may add more in the future) of HP Proliant DL160 G6s. They all run either Linux (server only, no X11) or VMware ESX. We had intended to get models with iLO, in case BIOS-level remote admin became an issue, but that didn't happen. I had an IP KVM switch recommended to me (along with some sort of Remote Reboot hardware.) I've since realized that none of our machines need GUI administration, so perhaps a serial console switch would be a cheaper and more appropriate option. Something like this: http://www.kvm-switches-online.com/serimux-cs-32.html Do you folks have an opinions on which way is a better choice? Should we go for the ease of setup (plug and go, instead of turning on the feature in the BIOS and making sure the serial settings are correct) and the flexibility of an IP KVM switch even with the extra cost? Or is a serial console switch just fine?

    Read the article

  • Virtual Box Networking; How to configure bridged networking on Windows 7

    - by Krist van Besien
    I have VirtualBox on Windows 7. I have two virtual machines running RHEL, that work fine when the network is set to NAT. However I want to change the network adapters for the VM's to bridged in stead of NAT. However when I go in to the VM configuration, and select bridged I also need to select an adapter, but there is nothing to select. Apparently I need to install a separate driver/filter on the network adapter. However I don't know where to start. I reinstalled VirtualBox (latest version) but did not see an option to install such driver. What should I do?

    Read the article

  • Why is my Linux box dropping network connection? [closed]

    - by Robo
    I have a Debian server in the form of a Raspberry Pi running Raspian. It has a USB Wi-Fi connection. Sometimes it would not respond when I SSH to it, and would require a reboot. I found something in syslog that may indicate what the problem is, can someone help with what this means? Dec 16 15:34:17 raspberrypi wpa_supplicant[1501]: wlan0: WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:21:29:6c:5c:3d [GTK=CCMP] Dec 16 16:17:01 raspberrypi /USR/SBIN/CRON[2109]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly) Dec 16 16:34:17 raspberrypi wpa_supplicant[1501]: wlan0: WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:21:29:6c:5c:3d [GTK=CCMP] Dec 16 17:17:01 raspberrypi /USR/SBIN/CRON[2127]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly) Dec 16 17:34:17 raspberrypi wpa_supplicant[1501]: wlan0: WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:21:29:6c:5c:3d [GTK=CCMP] Dec 16 18:17:01 raspberrypi /USR/SBIN/CRON[2142]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly) Dec 16 18:34:17 raspberrypi wpa_supplicant[1501]: wlan0: WPA: Group rekeying completed with 00:21:29:6c:5c:3d [GTK=CCMP] Dec 16 19:17:01 raspberrypi /USR/SBIN/CRON[2161]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly) Dec 16 19:31:29 raspberrypi kernel: [16615.391509] ieee80211 phy0: wlan0: No probe response from AP 00:21:29:6c:5c:3d after 500ms, disconnecting. Dec 16 19:31:29 raspberrypi wpa_supplicant[1501]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED bssid=00:21:29:6c:5c:3d reason=4 Dec 16 19:31:29 raspberrypi kernel: [16615.416189] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain Dec 16 19:31:30 raspberrypi ifplugd(wlan0)[1444]: Link beat lost. Dec 16 19:31:40 raspberrypi ifplugd(wlan0)[1444]: Executing '/etc/ifplugd/ifplugd.action wlan0 down'. Dec 16 19:31:40 raspberrypi wpa_supplicant[1501]: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-TERMINATING - signal 15 received Dec 16 19:31:40 raspberrypi ifplugd(wlan0)[1444]: Program executed successfully. Dec 16 19:31:42 raspberrypi ntpd[1928]: Deleting interface #2 wlan0, 192.168.1.10#123, interface stats: received=321, sent=327, dropped=0, active_time=16596 secs Dec 16 19:31:42 raspberrypi ntpd[1928]: 202.6.116.123 interface 192.168.1.10 -> (none) Dec 16 19:31:42 raspberrypi ntpd[1928]: 203.99.128.34 interface 192.168.1.10 -> (none) Dec 16 19:31:42 raspberrypi ntpd[1928]: 203.118.148.40 interface 192.168.1.10 -> (none) Dec 16 19:31:42 raspberrypi ntpd[1928]: 202.89.49.65 interface 192.168.1.10 -> (none) Dec 16 19:31:42 raspberrypi ntpd[1928]: peers refreshed

    Read the article

  • I can't do a Remote Assistance session to a Windows XP box from Windows 7.

    - by superkinhluan
    My Mom's computer is running Windows XP, and my desktop running Windows 7. She's having some technical issue, so I want to do a Remote Assistance session to her machine. However, no matter what I've tried, the Remote Assistance program doesn't connect successfully. I've verified that the Windows Firewall (on both my and her machines) is configured properly to allow Remote Assistance program to go through. What's interesting is that I have the same problem when I try to do Remote Assistance from my desktop to my laptop, which is also running Windows XP. However, when I try to connect to my girlfriend's machine, which is runninng Windows 7 this time, the connection is successful. So in the end, I guess there must be some incompability between Windows 7 and Windows XP. Does anyone experience the same issue? How did you resolve it?

    Read the article

  • What kinds of protections against viruses does Linux provide out of the box for the average user?

    - by ChocoDeveloper
    I know others have asked this, but I have other questions related to this. In particular, I'm concerned about the damage that the virus can do the user itself (his files), not the OS in general nor other users of the same machine. This question came to my mind because of that ransomware virus that is encrypting machines all over the world, and then asking the user to send a payment in Bitcoin if he wants to recover his files. I have already received and opened the email that is supposed to contain the virus, so I guess I didn't do that bad because nothing happened. But would I have survived if I opened the attachment and it was aimed at Linux users? I guess not. One of the advantages is that files are not executable by default right after downloading them. Is that just a bad default in Windows and could be fixed with a proper configuration? As a Linux user, I thought my machine was pretty secure by default, and I was even told that I shouldn't bother installing an antivirus. But I have read some people saying that the most important (or only?) difference is that Linux is just less popular, so almost no one writes viruses for it. Is that right? What else can I do to be safe from this kind of ransomware virus? Not automatically executing random files from unknown sources seems to be more than enough, but is it? I can't think of many other things a user can do to protect his own files (not the OS, not other users), because he has full permissions on them.

    Read the article

  • How to make sure rsync sets proper file permissions?

    - by BetaRide
    I'm transfering data from a synology box to a debian box with rsync. Unfortunately the permissions of all transfered files are set to rwxrwxrwx on the debian box. I want to make sure this files can be seen by the owning user only. Is there a way to tell the debian box to set the permissions to something like rwx------? The rsync job is set-up through the DSM GUI. If possible I'd rather avoid hacking the synology box and do something on the command line. This means I'm looking for a way to set the permissions on the server side (debian box). I'm using the latest DSM version (4.1).

    Read the article

  • What is the simplest way to confirm or to disprove that Virtual Box virtual machines support GRE protocol

    - by mbaitoff
    It is stated in VirtualBox manual (chapter 6) that VM network interfaces in "NAT" mode do not support GRE protocol. I'm currently trying to setup a pair of VMs as pptp server and client which would communicate via VM's network interfaces in "INTERNAL NETWORK" mode. I set up modern Linux OSes with pptp software on both machines and made some basic pptp configuration. However, I fail to connect the client to the server - server reports a failure when writing to GRE socket. I now need a quick proof of principal ability to use the GRE protocol between VirtualBox VMs over a network in "INTERNAL" mode, such as a several-line .c program that would try to open/send/receive/close a GRE protocol connection, or like a specific lightweight tool to diagnose the GRE availability. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • How can I turn my server box into an internet modem?

    - by Robbie Mckennie
    I've been trying to learn about networking, network maintenance, network administration, stuff of that nature (I want to be a network engineer when I get out of university after I get out of high school) and I want to set up my older PC (running Slackware) as a modem, as a project to help me learn. I want to know what kind of hardware I'll need. Pretty much all I know is that my current modem uses ADSL2+ and PPPoA, which I think is a software thing anyway. How can I accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • How can i set up email alerts for disk failures on a windows server 2012 box?

    - by Leo
    I have a windows 2012 server with 3 storage spaces set up, each containing a mirrored pair of 2TB drives. What is the best way to set up alerting so that i receive an alert when a physical disk fails? Ideally i would like these alerts to be sent via email to a pre-defined address. The current server set up is as follows: Intel Core i7 2600k 3.4GHz Socket 1155 8MB Cache Asrock H77 PRO4/MVP Socket 1155 VGA DVI HDMI 7.1 Channel Audio ATX Motherboard 16GB RAM 1 x 60GB SSD (OS) 6 x 2TB SATA III 7200 HDD (DATA)

    Read the article

  • Problems with MGCP proxy creation

    - by Popof
    Hi, I'm trying to bypass my ISP router with my FreeBSD server (I've an optical connection so I've a RJ45 used to connect the box to WAN) Internet and TV are working fine (Using igmpproxy to forward TV stream) but I've a problem with phone. ISP's box is connected to the server which gives it a LAN address. The problem is that when the box builds MGCP packets (and especially SDP ones) it uses its LAN address. So I've think of writing an UDP proxy to handle MGCP and SDP packets in order to replace LAN address with server WAN address and then forward packet to WAN. Before starting coding I've captured stream packets using my server as a bridge between WAN connection and the ISP's box. And, in order to see if my solution is viable, I've tried to send those packets to the box using nemesis. I tried to send a packet (found in capture) containing an endpoint audit: AUEP 1447 aaln/[email protected] MGCP 1.0 F: A In the wireshark capture the box replied: 200 1447 OK A: a:PCMU;PCMA;G726-16;G726-24;G726-32;G726-40;G.723.1-5.3;G.723.1-6.3;G729;TELEPHONE-EVENT, fmtp:"TELEPHONE-EVENT 0-15,144,149,159", p:10-30, b:4-40, e:on, t:00, s:on, v:L;M;G;D, m:sendonly;recvonly;sendrecv;inactive;confrnce;replcate;netwtest;netwloop, dq-gi But when I use nemesis, I got an ICMP error: Port unreachable (Type 3, Code 3). To build this packet, WAN source address of the capture is replaced with my server LAN address, using the mgcp-callagent port (2727) and the packet is sent to the LAN address of the box at mgcp-gateway port (2427). The command I use is nemesis udp -S 192.168.2.1 -D 192.168.2.2 -x 2727 -y 2427 -P packet_to_send. I also tried an UDP scan to the box on callagent and gateway port: PORT STATE SERVICE 2727/udp open|filtered unknown 2427/udp closed unknown I found those results a little bit strange because it should be the 2427 port opened, as it was in capture. Internet Protocol, Src: <ISP MGCP Server>, Dst: <My WAN Address> User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: mgcp-callagent (2727), Dst Port: mgcp-gateway (2427) Does someone has any idea about how having my box responding to my requests ? Thanks in advance and sorry for my english.

    Read the article

  • How do I remote desktop to my work's Windows box from my Mac at home through VPN?

    - by CT
    I would like to remote desktop from my Macbook to my Work's laptop from home. I connect to the work's network via Cisco VPN. My Cisco VPN clients connects fine in Mac OS X but I am unable to remote desktop. I am also unable to ping my work laptop. The laptop is powered on and not sleeping. I can access it via LogMeIn. If I were to actually pug into our network at the building. I can remote desktop to my work laptop from my Macbook. If I use a Windows virtual machine and connect using the Windows Cisco VPN client, I am able to RDP and ping my work laptop. What is wrong with my OS X VPN connection?

    Read the article

  • I would like to have a publicly accessable linux box hosted elsewhere. Who provides this service?

    - by Eric Wilson
    I would like to have a general purpose linux server available and publicly accessible. I understand that there are no lack of web-hosting companies, but I might want more control over the machine than is typical. I would want the ability to install software, such as an SVN server, and I would like to be able to expose various port numbers, as I may have a variety of extremely low traffic sites that I would want to have available. Obviously, one option is to host such a machine in my home. Is that my only option? Or is what I describe out there, possible as a virtual machine on a larger server?

    Read the article

  • How do I remote desktop to my work's Windows box from my Mac at home through VPN?

    - by CT.
    I would like to remote desktop from my Macbook to my Work's laptop from home. I connect to the work's network via Cisco VPN. My Cisco VPN clients connects fine in Mac OS X but I am unable to remote desktop. I am also unable to ping my work laptop. The laptop is powered on and not sleeping. I can access it via LogMeIn. If I were to actually pug into our network at the building. I can remote desktop to my work laptop from my Macbook. If I use a Windows virtual machine and connect using the Windows Cisco VPN client, I am able to RDP and ping my work laptop. What is wrong with my OS X VPN connection?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use Linux as a Fibre Channel Raid Disk Box?

    - by SvenW
    You probably all know the relatively simple RAID boxes exporting a bunch of SATA disks as one big drive via FC, SAS or iSCSI, like the HP StorageWorks MSA2000, Infortrends EonStore series or many different other models from different manufacturers. Is it possible to create such a device with Linux, a few disks and an FC controller, using the controller in the reverse direction than usual? This would come handy to test some ideas and concepts in an emerging SAN environment.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73  | Next Page >