Search Results

Search found 4735 results on 190 pages for 'handling interruptions'.

Page 66/190 | < Previous Page | 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73  | Next Page >

  • What's the best practice to do SOA exception handling?

    - by sun1991
    Here's some interesting debate going on between me and my colleague when coming to handle SOA exceptions: On one side, I support what Juval Lowy said in Programming WCF Services 3rd Edition: As stated at the beginning of this chapter, it is a common illusion that clients care about errors or have anything meaningful to do when they occur. Any attempt to bake such capabilities into the client creates an inordinate degree of coupling between the client and the object, raising serious design questions. How could the client possibly know more about the error than the service, unless it is tightly coupled to it? What if the error originated several layers below the service—should the client be coupled to those lowlevel layers? Should the client try the call again? How often and how frequently? Should the client inform the user of the error? Is there a user? By having all service exceptions be indistinguishable from one another, WCF decouples the client from the service. The less the client knows about what happened on the service side, the more decoupled the interaction will be. On the other side, here's what my colleague suggest: I believe it’s simply incorrect, as it does not align with best practices in building a service oriented architecture and it ignores the general idea that there are problems that users are able to recover from, such as not keying a value correctly. If we considered only systems exceptions, perhaps this idea holds, but systems exceptions are only part of the exception domain. User recoverable exceptions are the other part of the domain and are likely to happen on a regular basis. I believe the correct way to build a service oriented architecture is to map user recoverable situations to checked exceptions, then to marshall each checked exception back to the client as a unique exception that client application programmers are able to handle appropriately. Marshall all runtime exceptions back to the client as a system exception, along with the stack trace so that it is easy to troubleshoot the root cause. I'd like to know what you think about this? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Handling SMS/email convergence: how does a good business app do it?

    - by Tim Cooper
    I'm writing a school administration software package, but it strikes me that many developers will face this same issue: when communicating with users, should you use email or SMS or both, and should you treat them as fundamentally equivalent channels such that any message can get sent using any media, (with long and short forms of the message template obviously) or should different business functions be specifically tailored to each of the 3? This question got kicked off "StackOverflow" for being overly general, so I'm hoping it's not too general for this site - the answers will no doubt be subjective but "you don't need to write a whole book to answer the question". I'm particularly interested in people who have direct experience of having written comparable business applications. Sub-questions: Do I treat SMS as "moderately secure" and email as less secure? (I'm thinking about booking tokens for parent/teacher nights, permission slips for excursions, absence explanation notes - so high security is not a requirement for us, although medium security is) Is it annoying for users to receive the same message on multiple channels? Should we have a unified framework that reports on delivery or lack thereof of emails and SMS's?

    Read the article

  • Good way of handling class instances in game development?

    - by Bugster
    I'm a new indie game developer, and I've made a few games, but often times when coding I wonder "Is this the way most people do it? Am I doing it wrong?" because I'd like to become a game developer some day, and I really want to get rid of bad practices in time. The way I'm doing it right now is like this: #include <some libraries> #include "Some classes" int main() { Class1 a; Class2 b; Class3 c; a.init(); b.init(); c.init(); // game logic; } Now as I see the game grow, I have more and more classes to initialize and create instances of. This is clean but I'm not sure if this is standard practice. Is this a regular way of creating instances of your game classes or is there a cleaner and more efficient way to do it?

    Read the article

  • Processing Binary Data in SOA Suite 11g

    - by Ramkumar Menon
    SOA Suite 11g provides a variety of ways to exchange binary data amongst applications and endpoints. The illustration below is a bird's-eye view of all the features in SOA Suite to facilitate such exchanges. Handling Binary data in SOA Suite 11g Composites Samples and Step-by-Step Tutorials A few step-by-step tutorials have been uploaded to java.net that illustrate key concepts related to Binary content handling within SOA composites. Each sample consists of a fully built composite project that can be deployed and tested, together with a Readme doc with screenshots to build the project from scratch. Binary Content Handling within File Adapter Samples [Opaque, Streaming, Attachments] SOAP with Attachments [SwA] Sample MTOM Sample Mediator Pass-through for attachments Sample For detailed information on binary content and large document handling within SOA Suite, refer to Chapter 42 of the SOA Suite Developer's Guide. Handling Binary data in Oracle B2B The following diagram illustrates how Oracle B2B facilitates exchange of binary documents between SOA Suite and Trading Partners.

    Read the article

  • What is normal SCSI error handling process (scsi_eh_3) CPU time usage?

    - by Kris Jordan
    Last week I got setup with a new dedicated server that is running 4x SCSI drives in RAID 10 on CentOS. The machine is pretty lightly loaded at the moment and has been running for 8 days. The process 'scsi_eh_3' has a CPU time of 13:09.67 in top. This is 3x the next closest CPU time of 4:03.93 for mysqld. Is it normal for the scsi error handling process to use this much CPU time? (Seems like it goes to 0.3% usage ever 5 seconds.) Could this be an indicator that one or more of the drives is having issues?

    Read the article

  • How to configure a Web.Config file to allow custom 404 handling while still displaying on-page 500 e

    - by Mark
    To customize 404 handling and based on the hosting company's suggestion, we are currently using the following web.config setup. However, we quickly realized that with this configuration, any page error (500 error) are also getting redirected to this custom error page. How can I modify this config file so we can continue to handle 404 with custom file while still able to view on-page error? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <system.webServer> <httpErrors errorMode="DetailedLocalOnly" defaultPath="/Custom404.html" defaultResponseMode="ExecuteURL"> <remove statusCode="404" subStatusCode="-1" /> <error statusCode="404" prefixLanguageFilePath="" path="/Custom404.html" responseMode="ExecuteURL" /> </httpErrors> </system.webServer> <system.web> <customErrors mode="On"> <error statusCode="404" redirect="/Custom404.html" /> </customErrors> </system.web> </configuration>

    Read the article

  • How to configure a Web.Config file to allow custom 404 handling while still displaying on-page 500 error detail?

    - by Mark
    To customize 404 handling and based on the hosting company's suggestion, we are currently using the following web.config setup. However, we quickly realized that with this configuration, any page error (500 error) are also getting redirected to this custom error page. How can I modify this config file so we can continue to handle 404 with custom file while still able to view on-page error? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <system.webServer> <httpErrors errorMode="DetailedLocalOnly" defaultPath="/Custom404.html" defaultResponseMode="ExecuteURL"> <remove statusCode="404" subStatusCode="-1" /> <error statusCode="404" prefixLanguageFilePath="" path="/Custom404.html" responseMode="ExecuteURL" /> </httpErrors> </system.webServer> <system.web> <customErrors mode="On"> <error statusCode="404" redirect="/Custom404.html" /> </customErrors> </system.web> </configuration>

    Read the article

  • Did the Unity Team fix that "generics handling" bug back in 2008?

    - by rasx
    At my level of experience with Unity it might be faster to ask whether the "generics handling" bug acknowledged by ctavares back in 2008 was fixed in a public release. Here was the problem (which might be my problem today): Hi, I get an exception when using .... container.RegisterType(typeof(IDictionary<,), typeof(Dictionary<,)); The exception is... "Resolution of the dependency failed, type = \"IDictionary2\", name = \"\". Exception message is: The current build operation (build key Build Key[System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[System.String,System.String], null]) failed: The current build operation (build key Build Key[System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary2[System.String,System.String], null]) failed: The type Dictionary2 has multiple constructors of length 2. Unable to disambiguate. When I attempt... IDictionary myExampleDictionary = container.Resolve(); Here was the moderated response: There are no books that'll help, Unity is a little too new for publishers to have caught up yet. Unfortunately, you've run into a bug in our generics handling. This is currently fixed in our internal version, but it'll be a little while before we can get the bits out. In the meantime, as a workaround you could do something like this instead: public class WorkaroundDictionary : Dictionary { public WorkaroundDictionary() { } } container.RegisterType(typeof(IDictionary<,),typeof(WorkaroundDictionary<,)); The WorkaroundDictionary only has the default constructor so it'll inject no problem. Since the rest of your app is written in terms of IDictionary, when we get the fixed version done you can just replace the registration with the real Dictionary class, throw out the workaround, and everything will still just work. Sorry about the bug, it'll be fixed soon!

    Read the article

  • Subterranean IL: Compiling C# exception handlers

    - by Simon Cooper
    An exception handler in C# combines the IL catch and finally exception handling clauses into a single try statement: try { Console.WriteLine("Try block") // ... } catch (IOException) { Console.WriteLine("IOException catch") // ... } catch (Exception e) { Console.WriteLine("Exception catch") // ... } finally { Console.WriteLine("Finally block") // ... } How does this get compiled into IL? Initial implementation If you remember from my earlier post, finally clauses must be specified with their own .try clause. So, for the initial implementation, we take the try/catch/finally, and simply split it up into two .try clauses (I have to use label syntax for this): StartTry: ldstr "Try block" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... leave.s End EndTry: StartIOECatch: ldstr "IOException catch" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... leave.s End EndIOECatch: StartECatch: ldstr "Exception catch" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... leave.s End EndECatch: StartFinally: ldstr "Finally block" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... endfinally EndFinally: End: // ... .try StartTry to EndTry catch [mscorlib]System.IO.IOException handler StartIOECatch to EndIOECatch catch [mscorlib]System.Exception handler StartECatch to EndECatch .try StartTry to EndTry finally handler StartFinally to EndFinally However, the resulting program isn't verifiable, and doesn't run: [IL]: Error: Shared try has finally or fault handler. Nested try blocks What's with the verification error? Well, it's a condition of IL verification that all exception handling regions (try, catch, filter, finally, fault) of a single .try clause have to be completely contained within any outer exception region, and they can't overlap with any other exception handling clause. In other words, IL exception handling clauses must to be representable in the scoped syntax, and in this example, we're overlapping catch and finally clauses. Not only is this example not verifiable, it isn't semantically correct. The finally handler is specified round the .try. What happens if you were able to run this code, and an exception was thrown? Program execution enters top of try block, and exception is thrown within it CLR searches for an exception handler, finds catch Because control flow is leaving .try, finally block is run The catch block is run leave.s End inside the catch handler branches to End label. We're actually running the finally before the catch! What we do about it What we actually need to do is put the catch clauses inside the finally clause, as this will ensure the finally gets executed at the correct time (this time using scoped syntax): .try { .try { ldstr "Try block" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... leave.s End } catch [mscorlib]System.IO.IOException { ldstr "IOException catch" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... leave.s End } catch [mscorlib]System.Exception { ldstr "Exception catch" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... leave.s End } } finally { ldstr "Finally block" call void [mscorlib]System.Console::WriteLine(string) // ... endfinally } End: ret Returning from methods There is a further semantic mismatch that the C# compiler has to deal with; in C#, you are allowed to return from within an exception handling block: public int HandleMethod() { try { // ... return 0; } catch (Exception) { // ... return -1; } } However, you can't ret inside an exception handling block in IL. So the C# compiler does a leave.s to a ret outside the exception handling area, loading/storing any return value to a local variable along the way (as leave.s clears the stack): .method public instance int32 HandleMethod() { .locals init ( int32 retVal ) .try { // ... ldc.i4.0 stloc.0 leave.s End } catch [mscorlib]System.Exception { // ... ldc.i4.m1 stloc.0 leave.s End } End: ldloc.0 ret } Conclusion As you can see, the C# compiler has quite a few hoops to jump through to translate C# code into semantically-correct IL, and hides the numerous conditions on IL exception handling blocks from the C# programmer. Next up: catch-all blocks, and how the runtime deals with non-Exception exceptions.

    Read the article

  • File copying utility like rsync with error handling like ddrescue, for data recovery from a hard drive with bad sectors or hardware failure

    - by purefusion
    I have a hard drive with either bad blocks or sectors that are failing to read due to potential mechanical issues, such as a bad disk head, bad motor, or some other issue that is causing the hard drive to read data excruciatingly slowly and with lots of read errors. I'm seeing an average of 50 KB/sec, with some reads dropping below 10 KB/sec, and frequently it gets stuck on a file or sector altogether, usually for quite a long time—from 2-10 minutes or more (when using rsync, before it times out). Speed seems to vary wildly, and it gets stuck on files a lot, and when it finally gets "unstuck" it only seems to last for a short burst before it gets stuck again. The drive is also very quiet with only an occasional sound of files copying (usually when it gets stuck/unstuck for a brief time, before getting stuck again). Thus, there are none of those evil sounds that are normally associated with HDD death. Someone suggested that the problems sounded like they might be caused by a misaligned disk head, which requires a lot of re-reads before it finally reads data with success. Sounds plausible, but I digress... Anyway, the problem with rsync is that it seems to have no decent error handling support. Obviously, it wasn't meant for use in recovering data from failing hard drives, but all the so-called "data recovery" utilities out there that are meant for such use usually focus on recovery of deleted files or messed up partitions, rather than copying files off dying hard drives. Deleted file recovery is not what I need, obviously, so perhaps you can understand my disappointment in not being able to find what I'm after yet. Naturally, this is where you'd probably say "You should use ddrescue!" Well, that's all fine and dandy, but I've already got most of the data backed up, so I just want to recover certain files. I'm not concerned with trying to recover a full partition block-by-block as ddrescue does. I am only interested in rescuing just specific files and directories. Ideally, what I'd like is some sort of cross between rsync and ddrescue: something that lets me specify source and destination as directories of normal files like rsync (rather than two full partitions as ddrescue requires), with a way to skip files with errors in an initial run, and then allows me to attempt recovery of those files with errors in a later run (with a slightly altered command, of course), perhaps even offering an option to specify the number of retry attempts ...just like how ddrescue works with blocks, only I want a utility that works with specific files/directories like rsync does. So am I daydreaming here, or does something out there exist that can do this? Or, maybe even a way to make rsync or ddrescue work in such a way? I'm really open to whatever solutions might work, so long as they let me choose which files I want to "rescue", and can skip files with errors in the initial run, and try/retry those errors again later. So far I've tried rsync with the following options, but it often gets stuck on a file for longer than the timeout, and ideally I'd just like it to move on to the next file and come back later to the files it gets stuck on. I don't think that's possible though. Anyway, here's what I've been using up till now: rsync -avP --stats --block-size=512 --timeout=600 /path/to/source/* /path/to/destination/

    Read the article

  • Making a COM dll to be invoked from c#, HRESULT error handling?

    - by Daniel
    I'm making a COM interface that c# will be using, however i am wondering how i am to check for errors and exception handling on the c# end as at the moment i am just returning a HRESTULT or bool for most methods. But several things can go wrong in some of these methods and returning a E_FAIL just doesn't cut it. What can i do in order to return more information? Can i make a HRESULT of my own?

    Read the article

  • Ruby / rubyzip alternative capable of handling rar/tar/zip/7z?

    - by Nick Gorbikoff
    I was wondering if anyone knows of rubyzip alternatives for Ruby, that can handle various formats in particular zip / rar / 7z? I know of libarchive, but it's not complete for my purposes ( it's a good gem thou). (To clarify, libarchive - won't work for me - cause I need to be able to run in on Windows. ( Yeah I know sucks to be me)) Right now I end up running system commands to the os, but I'd like something OS independent, and capable of handling those formats - reading and writing. Thank you

    Read the article

  • Which database and language is better at handling Unicode?

    - by user187809
    which database should I use, if my application is going to be in multiple languages (including Chinese, Japanese etc)? In other words, is MySQL better or worse than Postgres to handle unicode etc? (these are the only two databases my hosting company has) Also, which language is better for handling unicode? PHP or Ruby/Rails?

    Read the article

  • [asp.net-mvc]Handling Multiple Form Actions on One View?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I have multiple master pages in my asp.net mvc web application... Each of the pages add,edit,view and delete functionalities.... What it does is i have to create multiple views for handling add,edit,view and delete functionalities (ie) the user has to navigate to another view to edit/view the details of a record... How to Handle Multiple Form Actions (ie) add,edit,view and delete functionalities on One View?

    Read the article

  • What You Said: How You Track Your Time

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    Earlier this week we asked you to share your favorite time tracking tips, tricks, and tools. Now we’re back to highlight the techniques HTG readers use to keep tabs on their time. While more than one of you expressed confusion over the idea of tracking how you spend all your time, many of you were more than happy to share the reasons for and the methods you use to stay on top of your time expenditures. Scott uses a fluid and flexible project management tool: I use kanbanflow.com, with two boards to manage task prioritisation and backlog. One board called ‘Current Work’ has three columns ‘Do Today’, ‘In Progress’ and ‘Done’. The other is called ‘Backlog’, which splits tasks into priority groups – ‘Distractions (NU+NI)’, ‘Goals (NU+I)’, ‘Interruptions (U+NI)’, ‘Interruptions (U+NI)’ and ‘Critical (U+I)’, where U is Urgent and I is Important (and N is Not). At the end of each day, I move things from my Backlog to my ‘Current Work’ board, with the idea to keep complete Goals before they become Critical. That way I can focus on ‘Current Work’ Do Today so I don’t feel overwhelmed and can plan my day. As priorities change or interruptions pop up, it’s just a matter of moving tasks between boards. I have both tabs open in my browser all day – this is probably good for knowledge workers strapped to their desk, not so good for those in meetings all day. In that case, go with the calendar on your phone. While the above description might make it sound really technical, we took the cloud-based app for a spin and found the interface to be very flexible and easy to use. Can Dust Actually Damage My Computer? What To Do If You Get a Virus on Your Computer Why Enabling “Do Not Track” Doesn’t Stop You From Being Tracked

    Read the article

  • Why not to use Array of errors instead of Exception Handling !?

    - by Naughty.Coder
    Why not using array of errors instead of throwing errors and check if it's not empty later in the code.... Exception handling is very confusing to me , I can not understand it's purpose ... can anybody enlighten me !? they compare it with die() as better not to stop the execution of the code , why would I stop the execution of code if I don't want to !? ofcourse I do I'm a beginner programmer , it might be confusing to you as well , or because i'm not very experienced in this ugly thing. Please in the context of PHP only.

    Read the article

  • MSDN Example of handling an exception from the TPL - Is this a race condition?

    - by David
    I'm looking at the TPL exception handling example from MSDN @ http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd537614(v=VS.100).aspx The basic form of the code is: Task task1 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { throw new IndexOutOfRangeException(); }); try { task1.Wait(); } catch (AggregateException ae) { throw ae.Flatten(); } My question is: Is this a race condition? What happens if task1 throws before the try has executed? Am I missing something that stops this being a race? Shouldn't it be written like this instead: try { Task task1 = Task.Factory.StartNew(() => { throw new IndexOutOfRangeException(); }); task1.Wait(); } catch (AggregateException ae) { throw ae.Flatten(); }

    Read the article

  • Has glassfish 2.1.1 a bug handling http request and handle them twice?

    - by marabol
    I'm using glassfish 2.1.1. I've watched a mysterious http/webservice-call handling. It seams an http request is handled by two different threads. After http basic authentication the first thread is faster. Persisting some data end, but writing response fails in glassfish internal. The second thread fails, because it tries to persist identical data and there are (unique) constrain failures. The response (the failure) of second thread was delivered to client. I don't won't discuss the behavior with the unique constrain failure. I've improve the webservice, so it can handle this better, because it could be happen anytime, that the client send the ws call a second time. But I think, glassfish 2.1.1 has an bug handling http request. Is there any known issue? Have I done an mistake? [#|2010-03-22T10:40:54.150+0000|INFO|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.core|_ThreadID=10;_ThreadName=main;|Starting Sun GlassFish Enterprise Server v2.1.1 ((v2.1 Patch06)(9.1_02 Patch12)) (build b31g-fcs) ...|#] ... [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.220+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.module.security.auth.realm.YaJdbcRealm|_ThreadID=26;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-1;ClassName=mypackage.module.security.auth.realm.YaJdbcRealm;MethodName=authenticate;_RequestID=4d8f23e9-5106-4d64-b865-1638d7075bde;|JDBC authenticate successful for: 8002 groups:[roleUser]|#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.220+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.module.security.auth.login.YaJdbcLoginModule|_ThreadID=26;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-1;ClassName=mypackage.module.security.auth.login.YaJdbcLoginModule;MethodName=authenticate;_RequestID=4d8f23e9-5106-4d64-b865-1638d7075bde;|JDBC login succeeded for: 8002 groups:[roleUser]|#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.220+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.module.security.auth.realm.YaJdbcRealm|_ThreadID=39;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-2;ClassName=mypackage.module.security.auth.realm.YaJdbcRealm;MethodName=authenticate;_RequestID=4ca7e3e5-5ab7-41ec-b3c9-d9260b1164c9;|JDBC authenticate successful for: 8002 groups:[roleUser]|#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.220+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.module.security.auth.login.YaJdbcLoginModule|_ThreadID=39;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-2;ClassName=mypackage.module.security.auth.login.YaJdbcLoginModule;MethodName=authenticate;_RequestID=4ca7e3e5-5ab7-41ec-b3c9-d9260b1164c9;|JDBC login succeeded for: 8002 groups:[roleUser]|#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.220+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.MyWebService|_ThreadID=26;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-1;ClassName=mypackage.MyWebService;MethodName=enqueue;_RequestID=4d8f23e9-5106-4d64-b865-1638d7075bde;|Received WebService call to enqueue() from client 59|#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.220+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.MyWebService|_ThreadID=39;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-2;ClassName=mypackage.MyWebService;MethodName=enqueue;_RequestID=4ca7e3e5-5ab7-41ec-b3c9-d9260b1164c9;|Received WebService call to enqueue() from client 59|#] ... [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.267+0000|FINE|sun-appserver2.1|mypackage.MyWebService|_ThreadID=26;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-1;ClassName=mypackage.MyWebService;MethodName=enqueue;_RequestID=4d8f23e9-5106-4d64-b865-1638d7075bde;|Successfully finished WebService call to enqueue() from client 59|#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.329+0000|WARNING|sun-appserver2.1|javax.enterprise.system.container.ejb|_ThreadID=26;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-1;_RequestID=4d8f23e9-5106-4d64-b865-1638d7075bde;|invocation error on ejb endpoint MyWebService at /MyWebserviceService/MyWebservice : com.sun.xml.stream.XMLStreamException2 javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: com.sun.xml.stream.XMLStreamException2 at com.sun.xml.ws.encoding.StreamSOAPCodec.encode(StreamSOAPCodec.java:111) at com.sun.xml.ws.encoding.SOAPBindingCodec.encode(SOAPBindingCodec.java:281) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.encodePacket(HttpAdapter.java:320) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.access$100(HttpAdapter.java:93) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:454) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:244) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:135) at com.sun.enterprise.webservice.Ejb3MessageDispatcher.handlePost(Ejb3MessageDispatcher.java:113) at com.sun.enterprise.webservice.Ejb3MessageDispatcher.invoke(Ejb3MessageDispatcher.java:87) at com.sun.enterprise.webservice.EjbWebServiceServlet.dispatchToEjbEndpoint(EjbWebServiceServlet.java:231) at com.sun.enterprise.webservice.EjbWebServiceServlet.service(EjbWebServiceServlet.java:157) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:847) at com.sun.enterprise.web.AdHocContextValve.invoke(AdHocContextValve.java:114) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:648) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:593) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:587) at com.sun.enterprise.web.WebPipeline.invoke(WebPipeline.java:87) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:222) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:648) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:593) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:587) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1093) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:166) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:648) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.doInvoke(StandardPipeline.java:593) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:587) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1093) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:291) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.DefaultProcessorTask.invokeAdapter(DefaultProcessorTask.java:666) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.comet.CometEngine.executeServlet(CometEngine.java:616) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.comet.CometEngine.handle(CometEngine.java:362) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.comet.CometAsyncFilter.doFilter(CometAsyncFilter.java:84) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.async.DefaultAsyncExecutor.invokeFilters(DefaultAsyncExecutor.java:189) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.async.DefaultAsyncExecutor.interrupt(DefaultAsyncExecutor.java:164) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.async.AsyncProcessorTask.doTask(AsyncProcessorTask.java:92) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.TaskBase.run(TaskBase.java:264) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.ssl.SSLWorkerThread.run(SSLWorkerThread.java:106) Caused by: com.sun.xml.stream.XMLStreamException2 at com.sun.xml.stream.writers.XMLStreamWriterImpl.flush(XMLStreamWriterImpl.java:416) at com.sun.xml.ws.encoding.StreamSOAPCodec.encode(StreamSOAPCodec.java:109) ... 36 more Caused by: ClientAbortException: java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer.doFlush(OutputBuffer.java:385) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer.flush(OutputBuffer.java:351) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteOutputStream.flush(CoyoteOutputStream.java:176) at com.sun.xml.stream.writers.UTF8OutputStreamWriter.flush(UTF8OutputStreamWriter.java:153) at com.sun.xml.stream.writers.XMLStreamWriterImpl.flush(XMLStreamWriterImpl.java:414) ... 37 more Caused by: java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.ensureWriteOpen(SocketChannelImpl.java:126) at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.write(SocketChannelImpl.java:324) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.OutputWriter.flushChannel(OutputWriter.java:91) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.OutputWriter.flushChannel(OutputWriter.java:66) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.SocketChannelOutputBuffer.flushChannel(SocketChannelOutputBuffer.java:172) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.async.AsynchronousOutputBuffer.flushChannel(AsynchronousOutputBuffer.java:81) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.SocketChannelOutputBuffer.flushBuffer(SocketChannelOutputBuffer.java:205) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.async.AsynchronousOutputBuffer.flushBuffer(AsynchronousOutputBuffer.java:114) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.SocketChannelOutputBuffer.flush(SocketChannelOutputBuffer.java:183) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.async.AsynchronousOutputBuffer.flush(AsynchronousOutputBuffer.java:104) at com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.DefaultProcessorTask.action(DefaultProcessorTask.java:1100) at org.apache.coyote.Response.action(Response.java:237) at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.OutputBuffer.doFlush(OutputBuffer.java:381) ... 41 more |#] [#|2010-03-22T11:18:44.376+0000|WARNING|sun-appserver2.1|oracle.toplink.essentials.session.file:/mygf-211/domains/mydomain/applications/j2ee-apps/myear/myjar-myPu|_ThreadID=39;_ThreadName=httpSSLWorkerThread-8080-2;_RequestID=4ca7e3e5-5ab7-41ec-b3c9-d9260b1164c9;| Local Exception Stack: Exception [TOPLINK-4002] (Oracle TopLink Essentials - 2.1 (Build b31g-fcs (10/19/2009))): oracle.toplink.essentials.exceptions.DatabaseException Internal Exception: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Eine Zeile mit doppeltem Schlüssel kann in das 'dbo.MY_TABLE'-Objekt mit dem eindeutigen 'MY_INDEX'-Index nicht eingefügt werden.

    Read the article

  • TabWidget Activity Handling - Does it Create a New Activity EVERY Time?

    - by stormin986
    When a TabWidget is using intents to designate the target Activity for each tab, is there any special handling of those Activities on the Activity Stack outside of the default operation? For Instance, if my app has tabs A, B, and C, and I click them in this order––A, B, A, C, A, B––how will the Activity stack change? My understanding of the default operation, if startActivity() is called each time on the intent, would have the Stack keep loading up new instances of the activities: A, AB, ABA, ABAC, ABACA, ABACAB It's hard to believe that's how it works though... Seems like it would be a waste of resources and could be endless. Can anyone tell me how this will actually work?

    Read the article

  • I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around handling the Activity Lifecycle...

    - by kefs
    So it seems i've created a fatal flaw and coded an app before understanding/handling rotation/lifecycle events.. Currently, all of my code is in onCreate of each activity. I've read a lot of lifecycle tutorials online, including the official dev guide info, but i'm still having an almost unbelievably hard time trying to wrap my head around the rotation/lifecycle events/methods and when to use them correctly. For example, my app currently has an activity that opens the db, inserts a record, then closes the db.. if i rotate my screen on this activity, the data is re-entered into the db. Using the available lifecycle events (onPause(), onResume(), etc..), how would I prevent this db call from happening again? Would I have to pass a variable through the state saying that the db call has been done, and not to do it again? Thanks in advance..

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73  | Next Page >