Search Results

Search found 23897 results on 956 pages for 'installation configuration'.

Page 69/956 | < Previous Page | 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76  | Next Page >

  • Full-text indexing? You must read this

    - by Kyle Hatlestad
    For those of you who may have missed it, Peter Flies, Principal Technical Support Engineer for WebCenter Content, gave an excellent webcast on database searching and indexing in WebCenter Content.  It's available for replay along with a download of the slidedeck.  Look for the one titled 'WebCenter Content: Database Searching and Indexing'. One of the items he led with...and concluded with...was a recommendation on optimizing your search collection if you are using full-text searching with the Oracle database.  This can greatly improve your search performance.  And this would apply to both Oracle Text Search and DATABASE.FULLTEXT search methods.  Peter describes how a collection can become fragmented over time as content is added, updated, and deleted.  Just like you should defragment your hard drive from time to time to get your files placed on the disk in the most optimal way, you should do the same for the search collection. And optimizing the collection is just a simple procedure call that can be scheduled to be run automatically.   beginctx_ddl.optimize_index('FT_IDCTEXT1','FULL', parallel_degree =>'1');end; When I checked my own test instance, I found my collection had a row fragmentation of about 80% After running the optimization procedure, it went down to 0% The knowledgebase article On Index Fragmentation and Optimization When Using OracleTextSearch or DATABASE.FULLTEXT [ID 1087777.1] goes into detail on how to check your current index fragmentation, how to run the procedure, and then how to schedule the procedure to run automatically.  While the article mentions scheduling the job weekly, Peter says he now is recommending this be run daily, especially on more active systems. And just as a reminder, be sure to involve your DBA with your WebCenter Content implementation as you go to production and over time.  We recently had a customer complain of slow performance of the application when it was discovered the database was starving for memory.  So it's always helpful to keep a watchful eye on your database.

    Read the article

  • Unable to run Tor even in terminal, Vidalia exit code 127

    - by Ubuntu Newb
    I'm using Ubuntu 12.10 (quantal) and I recently installed Tor (32 bits) following the instructions on the Tor project's page. Then I started the script after having it extracted from the console and got this: master@ubuntu:~/tor-browser_en-US$ ./start-tor-browser Launching Tor Browser Bundle for Linux in /home/master/tor-browser_en-US ./start-tor-browser: 225: ./start-tor-browser: ./App/vidalia: not found Vidalia exited abnormally. Exit code: 127 Then I ran Vidalia from the console and: master@ubuntu:~/tor-browser_en-US$ vidalia (<unknown>:11354): IBUS-WARNING **: Unable to load /var/lib/dbus/machine-id: Failed to open file '/var/lib/dbus/machine-id': Permission denied master@ubuntu:~/tor-browser_en-US$ vidalia (<unknown>:11358): IBUS-WARNING **: Unable to load /var/lib/dbus/machine-id: Failed to open file '/var/lib/dbus/machine-id': Permission denied And after Vidalia's GUI opens I get the error prompt about starting Tor: "Vidalia was unable to start Tor. Check your settings to ensure the correct name and location of your Tor executable is specified." How can I start Tor?

    Read the article

  • Windows 7 not booting after installing Ubuntu 12.10

    - by Imran Choudhry
    I have Samsung sf511 with Windows 7 Home preinstalled. I installed Ubuntu 12.10 last night. First I mounted downloaded ubuntu 12.10 iso on a DVD from Windows 7, then I restarted, changed the boot option to DVD and let the Ubuntu DVD run. I selected "Install ubuntu alongside windows 7". In the next step I allocated the diskspace . Ubuntu installed perfectly and it ranned OK. I spent a good time exploring Ubuntu. When I restarted to start my work on Windows again and selected Windows 7 to boot, it showed blue screen after booting up (after logging in). I tried restarting several times but the same blue screen keep showing at the same point of bootup. I also restored windows to an earlier time. Left with no option I booted from Samsung provided windows recovery option. The recovery process ran fine but when it restarted to boot Windows for the first time all I see is a black screen. Nothing happens. It switches between dark command promt screen to a pitch black screen as if it's rebooting after every 10 seconds or so. The laptop can be booted from the DVD Drive or USB drive but is not booting from Harddisk. What should I do in order to use both Windows 7 and Ubuntu?

    Read the article

  • I tried to transplant the wireless_tools to Android4.0 system, but I have a problem with Java

    - by Chen Guoli
    My Linux system is Ubuntu Kylin, a new branch of Ubuntu spreading mainly in China. I have changed some files, such as wireless.22.h, ifrename.c and iwlib.h, in wireless_tools.29/ which is located in Android4.0 root directory. Then I followed these steps: $ cd ~/Android4.0 $ su $[key](change to root) root# source build/envsetup.sh root# cd ~/Android4.0/wireless_tools.2.9/ root# mm Then I got a message telling me that: Your version is: java version "1.7.0_21". The correct version is: Java SE 1.6. Then I did as How can I uninstall my current java and install sun java 1.6 The java was installed successfully, but when i tried mm again: Your version is: java version "1.6.0_27". The correct version is: Java SE 1.6. Then I tried https://source.android.com/source/initializing.html , but it didn't work. How can I install "java SE 1.6." correctly?

    Read the article

  • Package operation failed when updating 12.04

    - by Gausstein
    Whenever I try to update 12.04, I get the "Package Operation Failed" message. I haven't been able to update my system. In the "Details" section it says: installArchives() failed: Extracting templates from packages: 30%% Extracting templates from packages: 61%% Extracting templates from packages: 91%% Extracting templates from packages: 100%% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 30%% Extracting templates from packages: 61%% Extracting templates from packages: 91%% Extracting templates from packages: 100%% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 30%% Extracting templates from packages: 61%% Extracting templates from packages: 91%% Extracting templates from packages: 100%% Preconfiguring packages ... Extracting templates from packages: 30%% Extracting templates from packages: 61%% Extracting templates from packages: 91%% Extracting templates from packages: 100%% Preconfiguring packages ... dpkg: error: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/available' near line 42150 package 'x11-apps': blank line in value of field 'Description' Error in function:

    Read the article

  • How do I install Geomatica?

    - by Chethan S.
    I wanted to try the latest version(trial) of Geomatica, Geomatica 2012 on Ubuntu 11.10 beta. When I tried to run the bin file I got a whole list of dependencies. It also seems that it is a RPM package. Instead of going through each entry manually, is there any easy way to search and install a list of dependencies? Here is the list what I got - rpm: RPM should not be used directly install RPM packages, use Alien instead! rpm: However assuming you know what you are doing... error: Failed dependencies: glibc >= 2.9 is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libstdc++43 is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgcc43 is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgomp43 is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgfortran43 is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 openmotif-libs >= 2.3.1 is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 /bin/sh is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libcairo.so.2()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libcrypto.so.0.9.8()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libcrypt.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libc.so.6()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libdl.so.2()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libexpat.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgd.so.2()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgfortran.so.3(GFORTRAN_1.0)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libGL.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgomp.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgomp.so.1(GOMP_1.0)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgomp.so.1(OMP_1.0)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libjpeg.so.62()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libm.so.6()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libnsl.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpng12.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpng12.so.0(PNG12_0)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpthread.so.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 librt.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 librt.so.1(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libSM.so.6()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libssl.so.0.9.8()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libtiff.so.3()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libutil.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libX11.so.6()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libXm.so.4()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libXt.so.6()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64 libXxf86vm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by geomatica-2012-12.0-0.x86_64

    Read the article

  • Adding UCM as a search source in Windows Explorer

    - by kyle.hatlestad
    A customer recently pointed out to me that Windows 7 supports federated search within Windows Explorer. This means you can perform searches to external sources such as Google, Flickr, YouTube, etc right from within Explorer. While we do have the Desktop Integration Suite which offers searching within Explorer, I thought it would be interesting to look into this method which would not require any client software to implement. Basically, federated searching hooks up in Windows Explorer through the OpenSearch protocol. A Search Connector Descriptor file is run and it installs the search provider. The file is a .osdx file which is an OpenSearch Description document. It describes the search provider you are hooking up to along with the URL for the query. If those results can come back as an RSS or ATOM feed, then you're all set. So the first step is to install the RSS Feeds component from the UCM Samples page on OTN. If you're on 11g, I've found the RSS Feeds works just fine on that version too. Next, you want to perform a Quick Search with a particular search term and then copy the RSS link address for that search result. Here is what an example URL might looks like: http://server:16200/cs/idcplg?IdcService=GET_SCS_FEED&feedName=search_results&QueryText=%28+%3cqsch%3eoracle%3c%2fqsch %3e+%29&SortField=dInDate&SortOrder=Desc&ResultCount=20&SearchQueryFormat= Universal&SearchProviders=server& Now you want to create a new text file and start out with this information: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OpenSearchDescription xmlns:ms-ose="http://schemas.microsoft.com/opensearchext/2009/"> <ShortName></ShortName> <Description></Description> <Url type="application/rss+xml" template=""/> <Url type="text/html" template=""/> </OpenSearchDescription> Enter a ShortName and Description. The ShortName will be the value used when displaying the search provider in Explorer. In the template attribute for the first Url element, enter the URL copied previously. You will then need to convert the ampersand symbols to '&' to make them XML compliant. Finally, you'll want to switch out the search term with '{searchTerms}'. For the second Url element, you can do the same thing except you want to copy the UCM search results URL from the page of results. That URL will look something like: http://server:16200/cs/idcplg?IdcService=GET_SEARCH_RESULTS&SortField=dInDate&SortOrder=Desc&ResultCount=20&QueryText=%3Cqsch%3Eoracle%3C%2Fqsch%3E&listTemplateId= &ftx=1&SearchQueryFormat=Universal&TargetedQuickSearchSelection= &MiniSearchText=oracle Again, convert the ampersand symbols and replace the search term with '{searchTerms}'. When complete, save the file with the .osdx extension. The completed file should look like: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <OpenSearchDescription xmlns="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:ms-ose="http://schemas.microsoft.com/opensearchext/2009/"> <ShortName>Universal Content Management</ShortName> <Description>OpenSearch for UCM via Windows 7 Search Federation.</Description> <Url type="application/rss+xml" template="http://server:16200/cs/idcplg?IdcService=GET_SCS_FEED&amp;feedName=search_results&amp;QueryText=%28+%3Cqsch%3E{searchTerms}%3C%2fqsch%3E+%29&amp;SortField=dInDate&amp;SortOrder=Desc&amp;ResultCount=200&amp;SearchQueryFormat=Universal"/> <Url type="text/html" template="http://server:16200/cs/idcplg?IdcService=GET_SEARCH_RESULTS&amp;SortField=dInDate&amp;SortOrder=Desc&amp;ResultCount=20&amp;QueryText=%3Cqsch%3E{searchTerms}%3C%2Fqsch%3E&amp;listTemplateId=&amp;ftx=1&amp;SearchQueryFormat=Universal&amp;TargetedQuickSearchSelection=&amp;MiniSearchText={searchTerms}"/> </OpenSearchDescription> After you save the file, simply double-click it to create the provider. It will ask if you want to add the search connector to Windows. Click Add and it will add it to the Searches folder in your user folder as well as your Favorites. Now just click on the search icon and in the upper right search box, enter your term. As you are typing, it begins executing searches and the results will come back in Explorer. Now when you double-click on an item, it will try and download the web viewable for viewing. You also have the ability to save the search, just as you would in UCM. And there is a link to Search On Website which will launch your browser and go directly to the search results page there. And with some tweaks to the RSS component, you can make the results a bit more interesting. It supports the Media RSS standard, so you can pass along the thumbnail of the documents in the results. To enable this, edit the rss_resources.htm file in the RSS Feeds component. In the std_rss_feed_begin resource include, add the namespace 'xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' to the rss definition: <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"> Next, in the rss_channel_item_with_thumb include, below the closing image element, add this element: </images> <media:thumbnail url="<$if strIndexOf(thumbnailUrl, "@t") > 0 or strIndexOf(thumbnailUrl, "@g") > 0 or strIndexOf(thumbnailUrl, "@p") > 0$><$rssHttpHost$><$thumbnailUrl$><$elseif dGif$><$HttpWebRoot$>images/docgifs/<$dGif$><$endif$>" /> <description> This and lots of other tweaks can be done to the RSS component to help extend it for optimum use in Explorer. Hopefully this can get you started. *Note: This post also applies to Universal Records Management (URM).

    Read the article

  • permission denied: /etc/apt/sources.list

    - by Eli
    I'm trying to install java jre, i usually do it like this sudo echo 'deb http://www.duinsoft.nl/pkg debs all' >> /etc/apt/sources.list sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 5CB26B26 sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install update-sun-jre exit but when i do sudo echo 'deb http://www.duinsoft.nl/pkg debs all' >> /etc/apt/sources.list i see permission denied: /etc/apt/sources.list When i do ls -l /etc/apt/sources.list i see -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3360 Aug 26 01:45 /etc/apt/sources.list When i do sudo mv /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.old sudo cat /etc/apt/sources.list.old | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list i see #deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ dists/precise/main/binary-i386/ #deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/ #deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ precise main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://lb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main and the issue is not solved, i still see that permission error, I'm on a 64 bit laptop

    Read the article

  • some files just wont install- linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic

    - by jatin
    It gives the following details of the package operation failing after using the sofware updater on 12.10: installArchives() failed: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 217566 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic 3.5.0-36.57~precise1 (using .../linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/System.map-3.5.0-36-generic' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-36-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-36-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-36-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-36-generic Preparing to replace linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic 3.5.0-42.65~precise1 (using .../linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/System.map-3.5.0-42-generic' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-42-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-42-generic dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-42-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-42-generic Preparing to replace memtest86+ 4.20-1.1ubuntu1 (using .../memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement memtest86+ ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/memtest86+.bin' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb Error in function: Output of df -h: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 38G 6.5G 30G 19% / udev 3.5G 4.0K 3.5G 1% /dev tmpfs 1.5G 924K 1.5G 1% /run none 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock none 3.6G 296K 3.6G 1% /run/shm none 100M 64K 100M 1% /run/user /dev/sda1 197M 87M 111M 44% /boot /dev/sda5 243G 971M 230G 1% /home

    Read the article

  • E-Business Suite Technology Stack Roadmap (April 2010) Now Available

    - by Steven Chan
    Keeping up with our E-Business Suite technology stack roadmap can be challenging.  Regular readers of this blog know that we certify new combinations and versions of Oracle products with the E-Business Suite every few weeks.  We also update our certification plans and roadmap as new third-party products like Microsoft Office 2010 and Firefox are announced or released.  Complicating matters further, various Oracle products leave Premier Support or are superceded by more-recent versions.This constant state of change means that any static representation of our roadmap is really a snapshot in time, and a snapshot that might begin to yellow and fade fairly quickly.  With that caveat in mind, here's this month's snapshot that I presented at the OAUG/Collaborate 2010 conference in Las Vegas last week:EBS Technology Stack Roadmap (April 2010)

    Read the article

  • How can I check if Python´s ConfigParser has a section or not?

    - by Voidcode
    How can I check if the ConfigParser mainfile has a section or not, And if it don´t then add a new section to it? I am trying with this code: import ConfigParser config = ConfigParser.ConfigParser() #if the config file don´t has the section 'globel', then add it to the config-file if not config.has_section("globel"): config.add_section("globel") config.set("globel", "settings", "someting") config.write(open("/tmp/myfile.conf", "w")) print "The new sestion globel is now added!!" #else just return the the value of globle->settings else: config.read("/tmp/myfile.conf") print "else... globle->settings == "+config.get("globel", "settings")

    Read the article

  • How can I accept the agreement for ttf-mscorefonts-installer?

    - by Magic
    After a recent update, ttf-mscorefonts-installer prompted me to accept its license agreement. For some reason my terminal will not allow me to accept, or for some reason I am pressing the wrong hotkey... I've tried every letter on the keyboard and Enter among others... I'm sure there is a very simple and obvious solution to this. I've also just tried to remove the package completely however the terminal states that due to the package not being correctly installed, I should reinstall the package before removing it. Very frustrating! Essentially, because I cannot successfully install this package, I can't really ever upgrade my system because I always have to end up terminating the terminal with the license agreement (thus the upgrade fails).

    Read the article

  • libreoffice-base not configured yet

    - by Wicky
    I have the LibreOffice ppa installed (ppa:libreoffice/ppa) and today I had a problem after updating. I got the following error. Reading package lists ... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information ... Ready You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: libreoffice-base: Depends: libreoffice-base-core (= 1: 4.3.0-0ubuntu1 ~ precise1) but 4.3.0-3ubuntu1 ~ precise1 is installed Depends: libreoffice-base-drivers (= 1: 4.3.0-0ubuntu1 ~ precise1) but 4.3.0-3ubuntu1 ~ precise1 is installed Depends: libreoffice-core (= 1: 4.3.0-0ubuntu1 ~ precise1) but 4.3.0-3ubuntu1 ~ precise1 is installed libreoffice-core: Breaks: libreoffice-base (<1: ~ 4.3.0-3ubuntu1 precise1) but 4.3.0-0ubuntu1 ~ precise1 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try to use -f. After trying sudo apt-get install -f I got the following output Pakketlijsten worden ingelezen... Klaar Boom van vereisten wordt opgebouwd De status informatie wordt gelezen... Klaar Vereisten worden gecorrigeerd... Klaar De volgende extra pakketten zullen geïnstalleerd worden: libreoffice-base Voorgestelde pakketten: libreoffice-gcj libreoffice-report-builder unixodbc De volgende pakketten zullen opgewaardeerd worden: libreoffice-base 1 pakketten opgewaardeerd, 0 pakketten nieuw geïnstalleerd, 0 te verwijderen en 0 niet opgewaardeerd. 3 pakketten niet volledig geïnstalleerd of verwijderd. Er moeten 0 B/2170 kB aan archieven opgehaald worden. Door deze operatie zal er 2841 kB extra schijfruimte gebruikt worden. Wilt u doorgaan [J/n]? dpkg: vereistenproblemen verhinderen de configuratie van libreoffice-base: libreoffice-base is afhankelijk van libreoffice-base-core (= 1:4.3.0-0ubuntu1~precise1); maar: Versie van libreoffice-base-core op dit systeem is 1:4.3.0-3ubuntu1~precise1. libreoffice-base is afhankelijk van libreoffice-base-drivers (= 1:4.3.0-0ubuntu1~precise1); maar: Versie van libreoffice-base-drivers op dit systeem is 1:4.3.0-3ubuntu1~precise1. libreoffice-base is afhankelijk van libreoffice-core (= 1:4.3.0-0ubuntu1~precise1); maar: Versie van libreoffice-core op dit systeem is 1:4.3.0-3ubuntu1~precise1. libreoffice-core (1:4.3.0-3ubuntu1~precise1) breaks libreoffice-base (<< 1:4.3.0-3ubuntu1~precise1) and is geïnstalleerd. Version of libreoffice-base to be configured is 1:4.3.0-0ubuntu1~precise1. dpkg: fout bij afhandelen van libreoffice-base (--configure): vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd dpkg: vereistenproblemen verhinderen de configuratie van libreoffice-report-builder-bin: libreoffice-report-builder-bin is afhankelijk van libreoffice-base; maar:Er is geen apport-verslag weggeschreven omdat de foutmelding volgt op een eerdere mislukking. Pakket libreoffice-base is nog niet geconfigureerd. dpkg: fout bij afhandelen van libreoffice-report-builder-bin (--configure): vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd dpkg: vereistenproblemen verhinderen de configuratie van libreoffice: libreoffice is afhankelijk van libreoffice-base; maar: Pakket libreoffice-base is nog niet geconfigureerd. libreoffice is afhankelijk van libreoffice-report-builder-bin; maar: Pakket libreoffice-report-builder-bin is nog niet geconfigureerd. dpkg: fout bij afhandelen van libreoffice (--configure): vereistenproblemen - blijft ongeconfigureerd Er is geen apport-verslag weggeschreven omdat de foutmelding volgt op een eerdere mislukking. Er is geen apport-verslag weggeschreven omdat de foutmelding volgt op een eerdere mislukking. Fouten gevonden tijdens behandelen van: libreoffice-base libreoffice-report-builder-bin libreoffice E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) How can I solve this problem so the dependencies are solved? Do I have to configure libreoffice-base manually?

    Read the article

  • ubuntu-12.04-wubi-i386.tar.xz for the wubi installer

    - by Alejandro
    I ran the wubi installer (from an extracted ubuntu ISO) and it downloads ubuntu-12.04-wubi-i386.tar.xz but it's slow and non-resumable so I cancelled it, found a mirror of the file online and downloaded it using Intenet download manager. Where should I be placing ubuntu-12.04-wubi-i386.tar.xz file so the wubi installer won't have to download that file anymore? Thank you. Update: I extracted the archive and there are two files, I'm afraid I do not know where to place them.

    Read the article

  • How to setup Automount/Autofs

    - by matt wilkie
    I've followed the ubuntu help docs for setting up NFSv4 on a server running Ubuntu 10.4LTS and now I'm trying to get Autofs (on ubuntu 10.10) to mount the exports, following these instructions. So far it doesn't work. Where the docs say server -fstype=nfs4 server:/ I'm supposed to replace 'server' with my server's hostname right? If yes, should that be server-foo or server-foo.local? # Sample /etc/auto.master file # --- comments snipped --8<-- +auto.master # pre-existing /nfs /etc/auto.nfs # added by me . # manually created /etc/auto.nfs ubuntu-server.local -fstype=nfs4 ubuntu-server.local:/ ls /nfs/ubuntu-server /nfs/ubuntu-server.local shows nothing. What's the next troubleshooting step?

    Read the article

  • Referencing environment variables *in* /etc/environment?

    - by Stefan Kendall
    I recently discovered /etc/environment, which seems a more standard way to setup simple environment variables than scripts, but I was wondering if there was a way to back-reference environment variables in the /etc/environment file. That is, I have this: JAVA_HOME="/tools/java" GRAILS_HOME="/tools/grails" GROOVY_HOME="/tools/groovy" GRADLE_HOME="/tools/gradle" PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games" If I try to add $JAVA_HOME/bin to the PATH definition, however, I get $JAVA_HOME/bin, and not the interpolated variable. To remedy this, I'm creating environment.sh in profile.d to add the /bin entries to the path, but this seems sloppy and disorganized. Is there a way to backreference the environment variables in /etc/environment?

    Read the article

  • How Can I Install LibreOffice Base?

    - by Rob
    Useful info: I have tried running sudo dpkg --configure -a and sudo apt-get install -f with no result. I am running Kubuntu 11.10 (the updater is far too unreliable to ever be trusted with performing a version upgrade) The rest of LibreOffice seems to work fine (apart from an annoying bug where tooltips are shown as black text on black background...) I have need to use LibreOffice Base to complete a mail merge document. However, I noticed it's not installed. When I go to install it however... rob@hydrogen:~$ sudo apt-get install libreoffice-base [sudo] password for rob: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies. libreoffice-base : Depends: libreoffice-core (= 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-base-core (= 1:3.4.4-0ubuntu1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-java-common (>= 1:3.4.4~) but it is not going to be installed Suggests: libmyodbc but it is not going to be installed or odbc-postgresql but it is not going to be installed or libsqliteodbc but it is not going to be installed or tdsodbc but it is not going to be installed or mdbtools but it is not going to be installed Suggests: libreoffice-gcj but it is not installable Suggests: libreoffice-report-builder but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I'm bemused as to which packages it seems to think I have held. As far as I'm aware, Kubuntu doesn't give you the option to hold packages... So, how do I get out of this dependency hell?

    Read the article

  • Howto install google-mock on Ubuntu 12.10

    - by user1459339
    I am having hard time trying to install Google C++ Mocking Framework. I have successfully run sudo apt-get install google-mock. Then I tried to compile this sample file #include "gmock/gmock.h" int main(int argc, char** argv) { ::testing::InitGoogleMock(&argc, argv); return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); } with g++ -lgmock main.cpp and these errors have shown main.cpp:(.text+0x1e): undefined reference to `testing::InitGoogleMock(int*, char**)' main.cpp:(.text+0x23): undefined reference to `testing::UnitTest::GetInstance()' main.cpp:(.text+0x2b): undefined reference to `testing::UnitTest::Run()' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I guess the linker can not find the library files. Does anybody know how to fix this?

    Read the article

  • OpenCV install problems on Studio 12.04 - broken dependencies

    - by Will
    I'm trying to follow the Ubuntu OpenCV documentation at OpenCV. The provided script has a line which executed for some time, taking away more packages than I expected (such as ubuntu-studio video); sudo apt-get -qq remove ffmpeg x264 libx264-dev When the script gets to the line below, it bombs; sudo apt-get -qq install libopencv-dev build-essential checkinstall cmake pkg-config yasm libtiff4-dev libjpeg-dev libjasper-dev libavcodec-dev libavformat-dev libswscale-dev libdc1394-22-dev libxine-dev libgstreamer0.10-dev libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev libv4l-dev python-dev python-numpy libtbb-dev libqt4-dev libgtk2.0-dev libfaac-dev libmp3lame-dev libopencore-amrnb-dev libopencore-amrwb-dev libtheora-dev libvorbis-dev libxvidcore-dev x264 v4l-utils ffmpeg The error msg is; E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I've since run Update-Manager, run sudo apt-get updates, rebooted, tried the above script line manually, and still no change. I've just run sudo apt-get install -f and nothing seemed to change. It did mention that some packages were no longer needed and could be removed by apt-get autoremove, so I ran that. It removed a number of packages, so I reran the install command above. Still same problem of held broken packages. I just ran sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade Part of the response was; The following packages have been kept back: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg I'm not sure what that means. I do know that it shows up in my Update-Manager and cannot be checked I then ran sudo dpkg --configure -a and then reran sudo apt-get -f install and the package was still not upgraded, though there was this very interesting comment; Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg : Depends: libavcodec53 (< 5:0) but it is not going to be installed or libavcodec-extra-53 (< 5:0) but 5:0.7.2-1ubuntu1+codecs1~oneiric2 is to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Then I ran sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade It showed I had one held package, so I ran; sudo apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes dist-upgrade It also exited without upgrading the package, so I ran; sudo apt-get remove --dry-run gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg:i386 And it gave me; *The following packages will be REMOVED: arista gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Remv arista [0.9.7-3ubuntu1] Remv gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg [0.10.12-1ubuntu1]* But when I reran sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade It showed the package was still there. *The following packages have been kept back: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.* Update: Just went into Synaptic PM and completely removed gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg Reran sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade And was told; 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. However, when I ran the original apt-get to install opencv (first code at the top of this question), it still gave me the same broken package errors. So I tried $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list # # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Studio 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release i386 (20111011.1)]/ oneiric main multiverse restricted universe # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Studio 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release i386 (20111011.1)]/ oneiric main multiverse restricted universe # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Ubuntu's ## 'extras' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. # deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main # deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main # deb http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/popinet/xUbuntu_11.04 ./ # disabled on upgrade to precise and then; $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/* But I don't have enough reputation to post the results here (it says I need at least 10 reputation points to post more than 2 links), so I don't know how to provide the requested feedback. Then tried; $ sudo apt-get check [sudo] password for <abcd>: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done However, no resolution of the problem yet. What else do I need to do? Will an upgrade to Ubuntu Studio 13.xx solve this problem (or compound it)?

    Read the article

  • How do I turn 'off' a (hosted) domain's web server while leaving email intact?

    - by foregon
    I have a web hosting account at HostGator (for a domain registered with GoDaddy), where I would like to only use email, and completely turn off the website/webserver (for that domain), such that it actually gives the following error like any other domain which isn't pointing to anything, so in Firefox it would be: Or in Chrome it would be: So I am not looking for just a blank page or server 403 error, but literally for it to act like it doesn't exist and the only way someone would know that the domain is in use, is if they WHOIS search it or know any of the email addresses on the main server. N.B. the domain is the parent domain in the HostGator account and other websites (which need to still be operational) are under it, but I'm thinking with DNS settings it can still be configured while keeping the one hosting account. How would I configure this?

    Read the article

  • BIP Enterprise Patches

    - by Tim Dexter
    Got some input from the support team yesterday BIP patching. I dont have any control over the patches but have a voice to get information out there. Just to clarify for you all, the recent 'rollup' patch, 9546699 that I blogged a while back supersedes all other patches for the standalone release. If you have an issue and log an SR, please ensure you have applied 9546699 and re-checked the issue. There are so many fixes and enhancements in that patch that your issue may be fixed or addressed. If you are a new customer and download the latest release, 10.1.3.4.1 from oracle.com. Please get onto the support site and get 9546699 applied straight away. For more information check out Pieter's Note on BIP patching - 797057.1

    Read the article

  • simple method to install a mail server

    - by oli
    I am looking for a simple way to install a mail server on my Ubuntu server. I would like to be able to receive and send emails though a webmail (e.g. roundcube). I have a domain name. The web server already works without any problem. When I googled "simple method to install mail server on Ubuntu", I arrive on blogs with literally hundreds of steps to install a mail server: A Mailserver on Ubuntu 12.04: Postfix, Dovecot, MySQL Creating a Mail Server on Ubuntu Postfix But, for sure I will make a mistake, if I follow those tutorials, and it will be very very time consuming. Most of the steps look very easy to automate, though. I've try several install methods: sudo apt-get install dovecot-postfix sudo tasksel install mail-server But from there, I have no idea how to add email accounts, and test if it actually works. Do you know if there is an automated way to install a mail server?

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu CD Boots to Black Screen

    - by Thomas
    I have a new Asus N76 Notebook and just downloaded the lastest ubuntu 12.10 desktop CD (x64). When I boot from the CD, I get to the selection asking to try or install Ubuntu (the text screen not the one with the Ubuntu logo). When I select one of these options, I get only a black screen. I have tried nomodeset, acpi=off but it does not change anything. I also tried booting a CD and an USB stick (same result). I have no idea what to try next. I have installed Ubuntu on several computers yet, never had this problem. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. Thomas

    Read the article

  • Clear Complete Instructions to Dual-Boot 12.04 on OSX Lion

    - by BCZ
    Honestly, google-surfing this question leads to so many half-answers and multi-part communications that it is both scary and frustrating to try to navigate them. The question here is simple: What are the clear and complete step-by-step instructions that you used to dual-boot 12.04 on your OSX Lion (entrapped) Apple computer. Did you use rEFIt, rEFIind, a special .iso of 12.04? What? Obviously, there is a preference for safer, easier, and more reversible methods. I can probably assure that the best answer will get plenty of views.

    Read the article

  • How do I install Flash Player 11 debug version in 11.10?

    - by shanethehat
    I want to replace my existing browser plugin Flash Player with the debug version, and update to FP11 while I'm at it. I also want to install the debug version of the projector player and make it the default player for SWF files outside of the browser. First the browser plugin version. I've downloaded the installer from the official site, but I'm not sure what to do with the contents. There is a usr folder, and I presume that I am to write the contents of this to /usr. There is also a file called libflashplayer.so, and I have no idea what to do with that. For download for the projector player has confused me further because it only contains one file: flashplayerdebugger. I don't know what to do with this. If there is a way to install these softwares through apt-get or the Software Center I would love to hear about it, I have only found solutions for the standard player, but otherwise could someone please tell me what to do with these files? Update Ok, so I've figured out that if I dump the flashplayerdebugger file into /usr/lib/ I can point Eclipse at it and compile and test SWFs as expected from inside Eclipse. But how can I set that application as the default player when I select an SWF in Nautilus?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76  | Next Page >