Search Results

Search found 8048 results on 322 pages for 'partial upgrade'.

Page 7/322 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

• Failed GRUB after 10.04 to 12.04 upgrade in system with LVM

  - by Vagelis L

  I am using Ubuntu Server as a SMB server at work and two days ago I have tried to upgrade it to 12.04. After reboot, I got this grub_xput missing grub rescue> and all attempts to start from this prompt failed (missing components, although grub directory is normally set as prefix). My system sits and boots on an LVM (soft raid-5). I have read almost all posts in many forums, tried grub rescue, boot-repair, ubuntu-secure-remix with boot-repair but without positive result. This is the log of my last (and best so far) attempt to fix this system. Any suggestions? Please help.

  Read the article

• Can I upgrade Unity

  - by user208455

  Since the bug described here I am moving LTS distros only, however the current LTS is 12.04, and I`ve seen how ubuntu 13.10 looks like, I know that the unity interface is a WOP but, I wanna know is there any possible way to upgrade unity in 12.04? and btw, after that wipeout ,from the post I was reffering to, that sam stupid (to be polite) thing did windows xp, but now I have shortenned the 500GB ntfs partition to 100 GB and added a 100GB ubuntu partition (for /) and a 200+ GB partition for /home and installed ubuntu 12.04 like that (in "something else"). And after a few minor grub issues everything works perfectly, just like it should be

  Read the article

• Can't upgrade 11.04: flashplugin-nonfree: Package is in very bad, inconsistent state

  - by Ondra Žižka

  I can't upgrade from 11.04. I've disabled all apt sources, but still I get: http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/6680/snmekobrazovkyg.png The only option I am capable doing is to format and reinstall whole system, which I don't prefer as I have tuned a lot of apps settings, etc. How can I fix this? Update: After restart, when trying to update all packages, I get this error: installArchives() failed: dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--remove): Package is in very bad, inconsistent state - before trying to remove rather reinstall it. Reinstalling it results in the same error.

  Read the article

• Ubuntu 13.04 to 13.10 Upgrade Failed

  - by BT643

  I have a VMware virtual machine running Ubuntu 13.04, and yesterday tried to upgrade to 13.10. The install got about half way through and then everything seemed to just freeze completely. I left it going overnight to see if it was just taking a while, but this morning it was still stuck. Nothing would respond at all so I had to just murder it and force a restart with VMware. Now, when I try and boot the virtual machine back up, it just hangs forever at the Ubuntu splash screen. How can I see what's actually going on behind the scenes rather than just seeing the splash screen sit there?

  Read the article

• Stuck in screen saver during upgrade

  - by vinni_f

  I'm upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04. The screen saver is now on and I can't exit it. If I type my password or move the mouse the screen flickers. Regardless of what I do the screen saver stays and the login prompt never shows. If I type my password and then enter it, it does nothing. Last time I checked the packages were all downloaded and I was in the install process. I really want this upgrade to work. It would be really bad to have to restart from a fresh install. Cheers.

  Read the article

• Ubuntu not booting after upgrade to 12.04 from 11.10

  - by ddd

  I upgraded to 12.04 from 11.10 today. After the upgrade, I did the usual reboot of the system and then Ubuntu hangs on Checking battery state..[OK]. I can login to terminal with Ctrl-Alt-F5 and I did startx but it hangs after displaying white images of the desktop icons..there is no menu or any top bar at all. I guess this problem has something to do with Xserver, but I cannot find xorg.conf on my system. How can I get around this problem? Also is there a way I can make a backup of my files through the command line, because the GUI is not showing up at all?

  Read the article

• apt-get upgrade E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  - by user292425

  When I typed apt-get install upgrade, I got error: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Setting up linux-netizen (1.0.1-1) ... chrome: no process found dpkg: error processing linux-netizen (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: linux-netizen E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) So I tried some method to fix it: sudo apt-get install -f and sudo apt-get install --configure -a But all methods are not working. Please help me....

  Read the article

• SQLAuthority News – Download SQL Server 2008 R2 Upgrade Technical Reference Guide

  - by pinaldave

  I recently come across very interesting white paper written for Microsoft by Solid Quality Mentors. A successful upgrade to SQL Server 2008 R2 should be smooth and trouble-free. To do that smooth transition, you must plan sufficiently for the upgrade and match the complexity of your database application. Otherwise, you risk costly and stressful errors and upgrade problems. SQL Server 2008 R2 Upgrade Technical Reference Guide is one of the best and comprehensive reference guide I have seen on the subject of SQL Server 2008 R2 upgrade. There are so many various subjects discussed about upgrade which one would always wanted to see. You can find the link of why one has to upgrade to SQL Server 2008 R2 over here: Why upgrade to SQL Server 2008 R2. White paper to upgrade to SQL Server 2008 R2 Upgrade Guide. Here is the quick list of content of the white paper. 1. Upgrade Planning and Deployment 2. Management and Development Tools 3. Relational Databases 4. High Availability 5. Database Security 6. Full-Text Search 7. Service Broker 8. Transact-SQL Queries 9. Notification Services 10. SQL Server Express 11. Analysis Services 12. Data Mining 13. Integration Services 14. Reporting Services 15. Other Microsoft Applications and Platforms Appendix 1: Version and Edition Upgrade Paths Appendix 2: Upgrade Planning Deployment and Tasks Checklist This white paper is indeed huge with 490 pages and 151,956 words.As I said, this is one of the most comprehensive white paper ever published on the subject. Just reading this white paper one can learn a lot about SQL Server. Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.SQLAuthority.com) Filed under: PostADay, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Documentation, SQL Download, SQL Query, SQL Server, SQL Tips and Tricks, SQLAuthority News, T SQL, Technology

  Read the article

• Overview of Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor

  - by Akshay Deep Lamba

  Problem Like most organizations, we are planning to upgrade our database server from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2008. I would like to know is there an easy way to know in advance what kind of issues one may encounter when upgrading to a newer version of SQL Server? One way of doing this is to use the Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor to plan for upgrades from SQL Server 2000 or SQL Server 2005. In this tip we will take a look at how one can use the SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor to identify potential issues before the upgrade. Solution SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor is a free tool designed by Microsoft to identify potential issues before upgrading your environment to a newer version of SQL Server. Below are prerequisites which need to be installed before installing the Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor. Prerequisites for Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor .Net Framework 2.0 or a higher version Windows Installer 4.5 or a higher version Windows Server 2003 SP 1 or a higher version, Windows Server 2008, Windows XP SP2 or a higher version, Windows Vista Download SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor You can download SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor from the following link. Once you have successfully installed Upgrade Advisor follow the below steps to see how you can use this tool to identify potential issues before upgrading your environment. 1. Click Start -> Programs -> Microsoft SQL Server 2008 -> SQL Server 2008 Upgrade Advisor. 2. Click Launch Upgrade Advisor Analysis Wizard as highlighted below to open the wizard. 2. On the wizard welcome screen click Next to continue. 3. In SQL Server Components screen, enter the Server Name and click the Detect button to identify components which need to be analyzed and then click Next to continue with the wizard. 4. In Connection Parameters screen choose Instance Name, Authentication and then click Next to continue with the wizard. 5. In SQL Server Parameters wizard screen select the Databases which you want to analysis, trace files if any and SQL batch files if any.  Then click Next to continue with the wizard. 6. In Reporting Services Parameters screen you can specify the Reporting Server Instance name and then click next to continue with the wizard. 7. In Analysis Services Parameters screen you can specify an Analysis Server Instance name and then click Next to continue with the wizard. 8. In Confirm Upgrade Advisor Settings screen you will be able to see a quick summary of the options which you have selected so far. Click Run to start the analysis. 9. In Upgrade Advisor Progress screen you will be able to see the progress of the analysis. Basically, the upgrade advisor runs predefined rules which will help to identify potential issues that can affect your environment once you upgrade your server from a lower version of SQL Server to SQL Server 2008. 10. In the below snippet you can see that Upgrade Advisor has completed the analysis of SQL Server, Analysis Services and Reporting Services. To see the output click the Launch Report button at the bottom of the wizard screen. 11. In View Report screen you can see a summary of issues which can affect you once you upgrade. To learn more about each issue you can expand the issue and read the detailed description as shown in the below snippet.

  Read the article

• Quantal: Broken apt-index, cant fix dependencies

  - by arcyqwerty

  I can't seem to add/remove/update packages Ubuntu software update has a notice about partial upgrades but fails Seems to be similar to this problem $ sudo apt-get update Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal InRelease Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal Release.gpg Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg [198 B] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg [198 B] Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal Release Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release [49.6 kB] Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release.gpg [198 B] Get:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release [49.6 kB] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release [49.6 kB] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main Translation-en Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner amd64 Packages Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner i386 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Get:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release [49.6 kB] Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Get:9 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Sources [22.5 kB] Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Get:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources [934 kB] Get:11 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:12 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Sources [7,832 B] Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main Translation-en_US Get:13 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Sources [713 B] Get:14 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main amd64 Packages [67.8 kB] Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en_US Get:15 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages [14 B] Get:16 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe amd64 Packages [18.8 kB] Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en Get:17 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages [1,155 B] Get:18 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages [70.2 kB] Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Get:19 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Get:20 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages [19.0 kB] Get:21 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages [1,394 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Get:22 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources [5,470 B] Get:23 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Sources [5,019 kB] Get:24 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Sources [155 kB] Get:25 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages [1,273 kB] Get:26 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted amd64 Packages [8,452 B] Get:27 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe amd64 Packages [4,786 kB] Get:28 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse amd64 Packages [119 kB] Get:29 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages [1,274 kB] Get:30 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages [8,431 B] Get:31 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages [4,796 kB] Get:32 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages [121 kB] Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en Get:33 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Sources [124 kB] Get:34 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Sources [1,379 B] Get:35 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Sources [30.9 kB] Get:36 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Sources [1,058 B] Get:37 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main amd64 Packages [311 kB] Get:38 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages [2,417 B] Get:39 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages [85.4 kB] Get:40 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages [1,829 B] Get:41 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages [314 kB] Get:42 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages [2,439 B] Get:43 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages [85.9 kB] Get:44 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages [2,047 B] Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en Get:45 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Sources [1,845 B] Get:46 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:47 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Sources [11.1 kB] Get:48 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Sources [1,383 B] Get:49 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main amd64 Packages [1,271 B] Get:50 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted amd64 Packages [14 B] Get:51 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe amd64 Packages [9,701 B] Get:52 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages [996 B] Get:53 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main i386 Packages [1,271 B] Get:54 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Get:55 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe i386 Packages [9,703 B] Get:56 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages [999 B] Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Fetched 19.9 MB in 34s (571 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: netbase : Breaks: ifupdown (< 0.7) Breaks: ifupdown:i386 (< 0.7) E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. $ sudo apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: dh-apparmor html2text libmail-sendmail-perl libsys-hostname-long-perl Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: ifupdown Suggested packages: rdnssd The following packages will be upgraded: ifupdown 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1179 not upgraded. 85 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/54.1 kB of archives. After this operation, 19.5 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 222498 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace ifupdown 0.7~beta2ubuntu8 (using .../ifupdown_0.7.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement ifupdown ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ifupdown_0.7.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/etc/init.d/networking', which is also in package netbase 5.0ubuntu1 Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for ureadahead ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/ifupdown_0.7.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) cat /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ dists/precise/main/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ precise main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main

  Read the article

• I can't upgrade 13.10 because of broken pipe

  - by user212179

  I try upgrading and this is what I get: christopher@chris-computer:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade [sudo] password for christopher: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: librhythmbox-core7 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/809 kB of archives. After this operation, 39.9 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 170617 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace librhythmbox-core7 2.99.1-0ubuntu1 (using .../librhythmbox-core7_3.0.1-0~13.10~ppa1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement librhythmbox-core7 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/librhythmbox-core7_3.0.1-0~13.10~ppa1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/librhythmbox-core.so.8.0.0', which is also in package librhythmbox-core8 3.0.1-1ubuntu2~ppa0 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/librhythmbox-core7_3.0.1-0~13.10~ppa1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  Read the article

• not able to upgrade maas to 1.4?

  - by SaM

  I am running ubuntu 13.04 LTS, and maas version runnung is maas 1.3+bzr1470+dfsg-0+1474+175~ppa0~ubuntu13.04.1, so i'm trying to upgrade it to mass 1.4 but its failing, sam@xsmaas01:~$ sudo apt-get install maas [sudo] password for sam: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: maas 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 87 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/1,912 B of archives. After this operation, 1,024 B of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 85268 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace maas 1.3+bzr1470+dfsg-0+1474+175~ppa0~ubuntu13.04.1 (using .../maas_1.4+bzr1693+dfsg-0ubuntu2~ctools0_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement maas ... Setting up maas-cluster-controller (1.4+bzr1693+dfsg-0ubuntu2~ctools0) ... ERROR: Module version does not exist! dpkg: error processing maas-cluster-controller (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of maas: maas depends on maas-cluster-controller; however: Package maas-cluster-controller is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing maas (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: maas-cluster-controller maas E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) sam@maas01:~$ Can anyone help me with this?

  Read the article

• probability of trouble-free upgrade

  - by intuited

  One of the problems with recommending Ubuntu to potential future users, especially those not particularly given to technical endeavours, is that there is a chance that upgrades will break their machine, and they'll have to pay or otherwise coerce some knowledgeable person into fixing them. In my limited experience of running successive versions of Ubuntu since 8-something on a couple of different laptops, this chance is quite high. I'm not sure if I'm just unlucky with the hardware that I'm using, or if it's a result of the higher-than-average number of packages I have installed, or if upgrades are just typically problematic. So I'd like to know the likelihood, for a casual user, of doing a release upgrade, for example from 10.04 to 10.10, without experiencing any regression bugs. Obviously this is dependent on the hardware that people are running. Canonical seems to be making some efforts towards collecting data on this, for example with the "I am affected by this bug" checkbox on their issue tracker, and with the laptop compatibility reports, but I've not seen anything comprehensive. I'm hoping for an objective reference here, for example a study carried out by relatively unbiased individuals. However, anecdotal evidence is probably useful too.

  Read the article

• Upgrade from 11.04 to 12.04 failed - unable to login

  - by Tobias M.

  Yesterday i updgraded from 10.04 to 12.04 via the update-manager. At the end it said "Failed to upgrade due to too many errors". Before that i got a lot of error messages that said packages could ne configured - they were all related to mono. Then it force me to restart. When booting now, I see the pink screen (without logo). After that it turns black and the cursor appears. Then its falshing around between beeing bright and dark and showing the cursor and not showing it. But no way i see the login-screen. At the moment i am not able to boot frm usb since my usb device is too large to be formated to FAT-32 (8GB). This all is happening on this machine: AMD E-350 Processor (2x1,65Ghz) 4GB DDR3 RAM 320GB SATA II Hard drive AMD® Radeon™ HD 6320 Thanks in advance to everyone who trys helping me ;) I have to continue working with data from this machine so i´d be pleased to get my data accessible. Greets ;)

  Read the article

• Failing to upgrade to linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic

  - by Dan Lee

  When I try to upgrade linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic I get following problems: dpkg-deb (subprocess): data: internal bzip2 read error: 'DATA_ERROR' dpkg-deb: error: subprocess <decompress> returned error exit status 2 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic_3.0.0-26.42_amd64.deb (--unpack): short read on buffer copy for backend dpkg-deb during `./lib/modules/3.0.0-26-generic/kernel/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.ko' No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.0.0-26-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-26-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.0.0-26-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-26-generic Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic_3.0.0-26.42_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-generic: linux-image-generic depends on linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic is not installed. I don't know why this happens to me; earlier upgrades always worked without problems. Does anybody know how to fix this?

  Read the article

• unable to upgrade to 12.10 beta 2 from 12.04 [closed]

  - by user85959

  Possible Duplicate: There's an issue with an Alpha/Beta Release of Ubuntu, what should I do? authenticate 'quantal.tar.gz' against 'quantal.tar.gz.gpg' exception from gpg: GnuPG exited non-zero, with code 2 Debug information: gpg: Signature made Fri 28 Sep 2012 03:55:55 AM IST using DSA key ID 437D05B5 gpg: /tmp/update-manager-bpIptI/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created gpg: Good signature from "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 6302 39CC 130E 1A7F D81A 27B1 4097 6EAF 437D 05B5 gpg: Signature made Fri 28 Sep 2012 03:55:55 AM IST using RSA key ID C0B21F32 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/UpdateManager.py", line 1110, in on_button_dist_upgrade_clicked fetcher.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/DistUpgradeFetcherCore.py", line 253, in run _("Authenticating the upgrade failed. There may be a problem " File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/DistUpgradeFetcher.py", line 41, in error return error(self.window_main, summary, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/utils.py", line 384, in error d.window.set_functions(Gdk.FUNC_MOVE) RuntimeError: unable to get the value gpg: /tmp/tmplqoLDu/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created

  Read the article

• Upgrade went wrong, laptop essentially 'bricked'

  - by hexagonheat

  I have an old netbook I was trying to upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10. Ubuntu was in the process of upgrading when everything completely froze. I left it sit for an hour but it would not respond to anything. So I powered down the machine and it didn't have the necessary files to run Ubuntu. I went to the terminal and it told me to put in some command that I can not remember to 'rebuild' something. That takes me to now, when I turn on the laptop it comes up with a screen "GNU GRUB version 1.98+20100804-5ubuntu3.3" and has a bunch of options such as: 1. Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-32-generic 2. Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-32-generic (recover mode) etc. (there are like 15 of these with different numbers after 2.6.35 and the word 'generic'. It doesn't seem to matter what I pick, it will go to the "Ubuntu" loading screen with the colored dots but then every time it will freeze and I have to reboot to the same thing. I can't seem to get a terminal prompt anywhere either. Any ideas? I can't think of what to do :(

  Read the article

• Terminal closing itself after 14.04 upgrade

  - by David

  All was fine in 12.04, in this case I'm using virtualbox in Windows. Last days the warning message about my Ubuntu version no longer being supported was coming up pretty often, so, yesterday I finally decided to upgrade. The upgrading process ran ok, no errors, no warnings. After rebooting the errors started to happen. Just after booting up there were some errors about video, gnome, and video textures (sorry I didn't care in that moment so I don't remember well). Luckly that went away after installing VirtualBox additions. But the big problem here is that I can't use the terminal. It opens Ok when pressing control+alt+t, but most of the commands cause instant closing. For example, df, ls, mv, cd... usually work, although it has closed few times. But 'find' causes instant close. 'apt-get' update kills it too, just after it gets the package list from the sources, when it starts processing them. I've tried xterm, everything works and I have none of that problems. I have tried reinstalling konsole, bash-static, bash-completion, but nothing worked. I have no idea what to do as there is no error message to search for the cause. It seems something related to bash, but that's all I know.

  Read the article

• Unable to run 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade' due to authentication issues

  - by TobyG

  I've just attempted to run sudo apt-get dist-upgrade on my Ubuntu box, but am getting the following error... WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! librdbmspp php5-ioncube-loader sw-libboost-date-time1.49.0 sw-libboost-system1.49.0 sw-libboost-filesystem1.49.0 sw-libboost-program-options1.49.0 sw-libboost-regex1.49.0 sw-libboost-serialization1.49.0 sw-libpoco I've tried running... $ sudo apt-key update $ sudo apt-get update ... as found in this question, but I'm still getting the error. Can anyone help, please? Update on 5th June Repos currently in /etc/apt/sources.list (links broken due to reputation being too low to include more than 2 links)… deb http: //gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner deb http: //security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //autoinstall.plesk.com/ubuntu/PSA_11.5.30 precise all deb http: //autoinstall.plesk.com/debian/SITEBUILDER_11.5.10 all all deb http: //autoinstall.plesk.com/debian/BILLING_11.5.30 all all

  Read the article

• Launcher icons are invisible after upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04

  - by Clo Knibbe

  I am re-purposing an old laptop. I installed 11.10 on it and then immediately upgraded to 12.04. (I could not directly install 12.04 as my system does not support PAE.) When my system was (briefly) 11.10, the desktop appeared as expected. However, after the upgrade to 12.04, the icons in the launcher area are invisible. If I hover over the spot where the icon should be the little popup window showing the tool's name appears, and I can click to invoke the tool. I just cannot see the icons. ![invisible icons in launcher][1] The icons do appear as expected in other contexts, for example in the Home folder and in Dash Home. My theme is "Ambiance (default)" I do not have a ~/.icons folder. This is the top level contents of /usr/share/icons: default DMZ-Black DMZ-White gnome handhelds hicolor HighContrast HighContrastInverse Humanity Humanity-Dark locolor LoginIcons LowContrast redglass ubuntu-mono-dark ubuntu-mono-light unity-icon-theme whiteglass (Sorry for the poor formatting, can't get it to show in list.) I suspect that the launcher isn't looking for the icons in the right place, but I don't know how to confirm that, or how to correct. This is my first foray into Linux, although I used to use Unix a few decades ago. This doesn't look much like my old Sun workstation, though! Does anyone have any suggestions or insights for me? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Distribution upgrade freezes

  - by lugte098

  When upgrading from Ubuntu 10.04 to 10.10 the distribution upgrade program freezes after it notifies me of a change in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.mysqld and asks me to keep the old file or accept the new changes (I accepted them). The terminal says: Configuration file `/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld' ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** usr.sbin.mysqld (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? y Installing new version of config file /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld ... The program hasn't done anything after this for about 2 hours now and I have no idea what I should do at this point. Can I quit the program and restart it? Or is there another action I should take? It did however change the '/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld' to the new version, but is still frozen...

  Read the article

• after upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04 cannot boot with linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae

  - by Ricardo

  After upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04, I cannot boot with linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae: process gets frozen in a xubuntu initialization screen (I had qimo installed). If I try the recovery mode (with the same Linux version), booting freezes after this message: Begin: Mounting root file system. If in grub menu I choose Previous Linux versions, I can boot using Linux 2.6.32-41-generic-pae. But once logged in, some things don't seem to work (apt-get update fails, update manager fails, HID menu does not provide suggestions...) (to be honest, I have no idea whether this is part of the bigger issue) Reading in Ask Ubuntu through apparently similar problems, I decided to follow some advices: got boot-repair and run it. The problem remains & I got this report. I also run as root in terminal $ sudo update-initramfs -u and this is what I got: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic-pae cryptsetup: WARNING: failed to detect canonical device of /dev/sda1 cryptsetup: WARNING: could not determine root device from /etc/fstab /tmp/mkinitramfs_EIDlHy/scripts/classmate-bottom/45xconfig: 9: .: Can't open /scripts/casper-functions What else? My pc is Intel® Core™ i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz × 8, graphs is GeForce 8400 GS/PCIe/SSE2, memory is 7,8 GiB. I have two questions: Is this a bug in the newest kernel I should report? Is there anything I can do appart from a fresh install?

  Read the article

• Fuji camera "mounts" but folder not in Dolphin After Kubuntu 13.10 upgrade

  - by user207207

  Fuji camera mount reported in attached devices but not visible in Dolphin After Kubuntu 13.10 upgrade Have reinstalled the driver, and a few other suggestions, for other cameras mounts failing on previous Ubuntu upgrades. I have already spent a couple of hours trying to get my photo's off the camera, very annoying. Worked perfectly in 11.04, 11.10, 12.04, 12.10 and 13.04. dmesg | tail; lsusb; lsb_release -a [ 6181.858786] CPUM: APIC 03 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90009400000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396236] CPUM: APIC 00 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c6a000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x00400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396239] CPUM: APIC 03 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c72000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396241] CPUM: APIC 02 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c70000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396255] CPUM: APIC 01 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c6e000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [32456.884907] usb 2-5: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci [32457.654046] usb 2-5: New USB device found, idVendor=04cb, idProduct=01e8 [32457.654050] usb 2-5: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [32457.654052] usb 2-5: Product: Digital Camera [32457.654053] usb 2-5: SerialNumber: 4C3230302020091117CAA59WP18548 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04cb:01e8 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 2013:024f PCTV Systems nanoStick T2 290e Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:082d Logitech, Inc. HD Pro Webcam C920 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu vissibleDescription: Ubuntu 13.10 Release: 13.10 Codename: saucy sudo apt-get install gvfs-bin gvfs-mount gphoto2://[usb:002,002] Error mounting location: Error initializing camera: -108: No such file or directory ...... I have reported a bug in Dolphin, which has been transferred to Solid. Further information : I ran solid-hardware list details udi = '/org/kde/solid/udev/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.1/usb2/2-5' parent = '/org/kde/solid/udev' (string) vendor = '04cb' (string) product = 'Digital Camera' (string) description = 'Camera' (string) Block.major = 189 (0xbd) (int) Block.minor = 137 (0x89) (int) Block.device = '/dev/bus/usb/002/010' (string) Camera.supportedProtocols = {'ptp'} (string list) Camera.supportedDrivers = {'gphoto'} (string list) I still can't get my photo's off, I can see the folders using the Gimp menu. If anyone has got any ideas, I'm willing to try them.

  Read the article

• laptop will not boot after attempting upgrade to 13.10

  - by naerwenya

  I wanted to update my OS to the new 14.04 LTS. I was running 12.04 LTS before and followed the advice that upgrades should be done in steps. I first upgraded to 12.10, which seemed to work fine, and later to 13.10. This was all done through the Software Manager. After the last upgrade, I am no longer able to boot up my computer. The GNU GRUB menu opens up, but after selecting Ubuntu, it just stalls with a blank purple screen. If I select one of the other kernels, it also stalls after "Loading initial ramdisk...". I can't get into the Recovery Menu, either. I'm still rather new to Linux and may have possibly made the situation worse. Unfortunately, nothing has worked yet. I tried reinstalling from a flash drive and on my first attempt, the wizard recognised a previous installation. Unfortunately, the wizard also didn't like how my partitions were set up (I didn't change anything) and gave an error before closing. Unfortunately, I didn't write the error down, but it was about the boot partition. On the next attempt and ever since, the installation wizard has stated that "This computer currently has no detected operating systems." This is strange, because I could see the disk and even access my files when booting up from the USB. At this point, I decided to back up my important files using dropbox. Before losing all my files, I wanted to try the Boot-Repair tool, which also produced no results, and the files are no longer visible when booting from USB. The link to the Boot-Repair log is at http://paste.ubuntu.com/7457249/. If I then proceed through to the "Something else" installation option, I can see that the partitions still exist. This is what they look like: /dev/sda free space (size indicated 1MB) /dev/sda1 efi (33MB of 98 MB used) /dev/sda2 efi (352634MB of 746330MB used) /dev/sda3 swap (3725MB, none used) free space (0MB) Is there any way I might be able to get my computer to work and preserve my files as well?

  Read the article

• MVC Partial View Postback - Jquery validation lost

  - by user415394

  I have a partial view which uses Jquery Valiation. This works OK when initially loaded, however after I do a ajax postback and return the partial view from the server with an error showing, the jquery validation seems to be lost. In that, if I delete a required field and hit save the partial view gets submitted, when I would expect it to show an error message and not get submitted. Does Jquery validation need to be initialised somehow for the form in the partial view?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >