Search Results

Search found 14757 results on 591 pages for 'switch statement'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 7/591 | < Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • How do I know if I need a level 3 switch?

    - by eekmeter
    We currently have a flat network with a bunch of unmanaged switches. I would like to use VLANs to segregate certain users like guests and I would like to use 802.1x. However, I'm not sure if what I need is a level 3 or a level 2 switch. From what I understand a level 3 switch does routing between VLANs. I don't think I need this at the moment but as I said I'm not sure since this is all new to me. What else would a level 3 switch do for me? Our network is relatively small, less than a 100 users. What exactly does a level 3 switch do that I can't get with a level 2 switch? When would I need a level 3?

    Read the article

  • Wireless switch on Dell XT2 - strange behaviour of rfkill

    - by DyP
    I have an Dell Latitude XT2 using an Intel WLAN card (lspci lists it as "Intel Corporation Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300") running Lubuntu 12.04 with recent updates. The laptop has a hardware WLAN switch. I have problems activating the WLAN when booting with the hardware switch set to "off". The situation is a bit confusing, unfortunately. rfkill lists two WLAN devices (though lspci only shows the Intel one). This is the situation when booting with the hardware switch set to "Off": 0: dell-wifi: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes 1: dell-bluetooth: Bluetooth Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes 2: phy0: Wireless LAN Soft blocked: yes Hard blocked: yes From some tests, I conclude WLAN is only activated when both, the dell-wifi and phy0, are unblocked by soft- and hardware. But I can only unblock dell-wifi after the hardware switch is set to "on". Procedure right from boot with hardware switch set to "Off": Soft-unblocking phy0 works as expected. Could be done by start-up script. sudo rfkill unblock 0: nothing happens. Soft block of dell-wifi not removed. Set the hardware switch to "on": phy0 gets its hard block removed. Still no WLAN. sudo rfkill unblock 0: both the soft and hard lock of dell-wifi are removed. WLAN is now active and works. sudo rfkill block 0: only adds the soft block as expected. WLAN goes off again. So, in order to activate WLAN, I have to use the hardware switch and afterwards (manually) run a script - that's a bit inconvenient. Does someone know a better solution? Maybe a daemon could help that listens to rfkill events to unblock dell-wifi after I have set the hardware switch to "on"? (sounds like another workaround) When booting with the hardware switch set to "On", nothing is blocked neither hard nor soft.

    Read the article

  • error: switch quantity not an integer

    - by nikeunltd
    I have researched my issue all over StackOverflow and multi-google links, and I am still confused. I figured the best thing for me is ask... Im creating a simple command line calculator. Here is my code so far: const std::string Calculator::SIN("sin"); const std::string Calculator::COS("cos"); const std::string Calculator::TAN("tan"); const std::string Calculator::LOG( "log" ); const std::string Calculator::LOG10( "log10" ); void Calculator::set_command( std::string cmd ) { for(unsigned i = 0; i < cmd.length(); i++) { cmd[i] = tolower(cmd[i]); } command = cmd; } bool Calculator::is_legal_command() const { switch(command) { case TAN: case SIN: case COS: case LOG: case LOG10: return true; break; default: return false; break; } } the error i get is: Calculator.cpp: In member function 'bool Calculator::is_trig_command() const': Calculator.cpp: error: switch quantity not an integer Calculator.cpp: error: 'Calculator::TAN' cannot appear in a constant-expression Calculator.cpp: error: 'Calculator::SIN' cannot appear in a constant-expression Calculator.cpp: error: 'Calculator::COS' cannot appear in a constant-expression The mighty internet, it says strings are allowed to be used in switch statements. Thanks everyone, I appreciate your help.

    Read the article

  • using switch in strings

    - by xtemer
    guys me trying to use switch in strings by first coverting string into char and then apply switch but still didnt done it....here is my code..help me out.. import javax.swing.*; import java.io.*; class HappyBirthday { public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { String Month; char[] Months = Month.toCharArray(); BufferedReader dataIn= new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)); System.out.println("Please enter your month."); Month = JOptionPane.showInputDialog("enter month"); String month1={"January","feb"}; char[] month2 = month1.toCharArray(); // String s=month1.equals(Month); //System.out.print(month2Array[0]); switch (month2) { case 0: System.out.println("kool"); break; case 1: System.out.println("not kool"); break; default: }}} /** if (month1[1].equals(Month)) System.out.println("kool"); else if(month1[0].equals(Month)) System.out.println("kooooooooooooool"); else System.out.println("Big kooooool"); **/

    Read the article

  • dynamical binding or switch/case?

    - by kingkai
    A scene like this: I've different of objects do the similar operation as respective func() implements. There're 2 kinds of solution for func_manager() to call func() according to different objects Solution 1: Use virtual function character specified in c++. func_manager works differently accroding to different object point pass in. class Object{ virtual void func() = 0; } class Object_A : public Object{ void func() {}; } class Object_B : public Object{ void func() {}; } void func_manager(Object* a) { a->func(); } Solution 2: Use plain switch/case. func_manager works differently accroding to different type pass in typedef _type_t { TYPE_A, TYPE_B }type_t; void func_by_a() { // do as func() in Object_A } void func_by_b() { // do as func() in Object_A } void func_manager(type_t type) { switch(type){ case TYPE_A: func_by_a(); break; case TYPE_B: func_by_b(); default: break; } } My Question are 2: 1. at the view point of DESIGN PATTERN, which one is better? 2. at the view point of RUNTIME EFFCIENCE, which one is better? Especailly as the kinds of Object increases, may be up to 10-15 total, which one's overhead oversteps the other? I don't know how switch/case implements innerly, just a bunch of if/else? Thanks very much!

    Read the article

  • C++ Switch Statement Case Error

    - by Metal_Drummer
    I'm programming a simple text-based RPG using a switch statement for a game loop. The program works fine until I attempt to add another case statement, at which point it gives me the following three errors: "jump to case label" (error occurs at the line of the newly added case), and two "crosses initialization of 'ClassName *objectName'"(errors occur when the new objects are created in case 2). I'll paste the important code, if anyone needs more, please let me know. int main(void) { //initiate first object array and add some objects //initiate second object array and add some objects while(gamestate != 8) { switch(gamestate) { case 0: //do some stuff break; case 1: //do some stuff break; case 2: //declare new objects of the two... //...classes I have (ClassName *objectName) //do some stuff break; case 3: //this is the case I am trying to add //do nothing break; } } return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Are there legitimate uses for JavaScript's "with" statement?

    - by Shog9
    Alan Storm's comments in response to my answer regarding the with statement got me thinking. I've seldom found a reason to use this particular language feature, and had never given much thought to how it might cause trouble. Now, I'm curious as to how I might make effective use of with, while avoiding its pitfalls... So my question is, where have you found the with statement useful?

    Read the article

  • if statement in aspx page

    - by Brad
    I want to write a basic if statement on my site to display either item 1 or item 2 depending on if a variable is set to true. I am not to familiar with .Net and need a little help with the basic structure of how to get an if statement to work on the aspx page. thank you for your help.

    Read the article

  • Return number of rows affected by SQL UPDATE statement in Java

    - by Krt_Malta
    I'm using a MySQL database and accessing it through Java. PreparedStatement prep1 = this.connection.prepareStatement("UPDATE user_table SET Level = 'Super' WHERE Username = ?"); prep1.setString(1, username); The update statement above works fine however I'd like to get the number of rows affected with this statement. Is this possible please?

    Read the article

  • Separate clauses of an if statement?

    - by tarnfeld
    Is there any way to have multiple clauses in an if() statement? For instance: if( ($username=='textUser' && $role=='admin') || ($admin=='yes')) { // If the username AND role are set to admin OR if the admin is set to 'yes' } else { // Neither clauses of the if statement are true } Perhaps this is actually the correct code, i have no tried it - but if not, could anyone tell me how? :)

    Read the article

  • MYSQL if statement question...

    - by Dennis_M
    Is there any way to get the if statement to evaluate a query? SELECT if(50,'EQ_Type','*') FROM EQUIPMENT; Resulting in: +-----------------------+ | IF(50,'EQ_Type','*') | +-----------------------+ | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | | EQ_Type | +-----------------------+ 9 rows in set (0.00 sec) I would like the above statement to be equivalent to the following: SELECT 'EQ_Type' FROM EQUIPMENT; And produce: +--------------+ | EQ_Type | +--------------+ | ENGINE | | ENGINE | | ENGINE | | TRAILER | | TRAILER | | TRAILER | | WATER TENDER | | WATER TENDER | | WATER TENDER | +--------------+ Thanks for any help

    Read the article

  • use a sql select statement to get parameters for 2nd select statement

    - by diver-d
    Hi there, I am trying to write a sql statement that I have 2 tables Store & StoreTransactions. My first select command looks like SELECT [StoreID],[ParentStoreID] FROM Store Very simple stuff. How do I take the returned StoreID's and use them for my 2nd select statement? SELECT [StoreTransactionID],[TransactionDate],[StoreID] FROM StoreTransactions WHERE StoreID = returned values from the above query Any help would be great!

    Read the article

  • How to simplify this php switch statement?

    - by janoChen
    I would like to change this: // use appropiate lang.xx.php file according to the value of the $lang switch ($_SESSION['lang']) { case 'en': $lang_file = 'lang.en.php'; break; case 'es': $lang_file = 'lang.es.php'; break; case 'zh-tw': $lang_file = 'lang.zh-tw.php'; break; case 'zh-cn': $lang_file = 'lang.zh-cn.php'; break; default: $lang_file = 'lang.en.php'; } into something like this: //include file for final output include_once 'languages/lang.'.$_SESSION['lang'].'php; So that I can skip the whole switch part. I tried other combinations but they don't seem to work. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • PHP Get variable to equal value of switch

    - by user342391
    I am trying to get a variable on my page to equal the result of a switch I have. This is the code: $payment_method = switch ($cardtype) { case "visa" : echo "VSA"; break; case "mastercard" : echo "MSC"; break; case "maestro" : echo "MAE"; break; case "amex" : echo "AMX" ; break; default : echo "Please specify a payment method!"; break; }; How can I get $payment_method to equal the result of this???? So far I recieve an error: Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_SWITCH in /var/www/account/credits/moneybookers/process.php on line 65

    Read the article

  • Dictionary with delegate or switch?

    - by Samvel Siradeghyan
    Hi, I am writing a parser, which call some functions dependent on some value. I can implement this logic with simple switch like this switch(some_val) { case 0: func0(); break; case 1: func1(); break; } or with delegates and dictionary like this delegate void some_delegate(); Dictionary<int, some_delegate> some_dictionary = new Dictionary<int, some_delegate>(); some_dictionary[0] = func0; some_dictionary[1] = func1; some_dictionary[some_value].Invoke(); Are this two methods equal and which is preferred? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • C# switch: case not falling through to other cases limitation

    - by Mike Fielden
    This question is kind of an add-on to this question In C#, a switch case cannot fall through to other cases, this causes a compilation error. In this case I am just adding some number to the month total for the selected month and each subsequent month thereafter. (simple example, not meant to be real) switch (month) { case 0: add something to month totals case 1: add something to month totals case 2: add something to month totals default: break; } Is there a logical alternative to this in C# without having to write out a ton of if statements? if (month <= 0) add something to month if (month <= 1) add something to month if (month <= 2) add something to month .... etc

    Read the article

  • how can i use switch statement on type-safe enum pattern

    - by Fer
    I found a goodlooking example about implementation enums in a different way. That is called type-safe enum pattern i think. I started using it but i realized that i can not use it in a switch statement. My implementation looks like the following: public sealed class MyState { private readonly string m_Name; private readonly int m_Value; public static readonly MyState PASSED= new MyState(1, "OK"); public static readonly MyState FAILED= new MyState(2, "ERROR"); private MyState(int value, string name) { m_Name = name; m_Value = value; } public override string ToString() { return m_Name; } public int GetIntValue() { return m_Value; } } What can i add to my class in order to be able to use this pattern in switch statements in C#? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • javascript switch using internals

    - by Fernando SBS
    Can I use intervals in a switch statement? Like switch (parseInt(troops[i])) { case <10: editbox.style.fontSize = "13px"; break; case <100: editbox.style.fontSize = "12px"; break; case <1000: editbox.style.fontSize = "8px"; editbox.size = 3; //editbox.style.width = "18px"; break; default: editbox.style.fontSize = "10px"; } ???

    Read the article

  • javascript switch using intervals

    - by Fernando SBS
    Can I use intervals in a switch statement? Like switch (parseInt(troops[i])) { case <10: editbox.style.fontSize = "13px"; break; case <100: editbox.style.fontSize = "12px"; break; case <1000: editbox.style.fontSize = "8px"; editbox.size = 3; //editbox.style.width = "18px"; break; default: editbox.style.fontSize = "10px"; } ???

    Read the article

  • Strange behavior of Switch Case statement in Java

    - by supernova
    I understand that Java switch case are designed this way but why is this behavior in Java int x = 1; switch(x){ case 1: System.out.println(1); case 2: System.out.println(2); case 3: System.out.println(3); default: System.out.println("default"); } output : 1 2 3 default My question is why case 2 and 3 are executed? I know I omitted break statement but x was never 2 or 3 but case 2 and case 3 still executes?

    Read the article

  • Is there programming language with better approach for switch's break statements ?

    - by Vitaly Polonetsky
    It's the same syntax in a way too many languages: switch (someValue) { case OPTION_ONE: case OPTION_LIKE_ONE: case OPTION_ONE_SIMILAR: doSomeStuff1(); break; // EXIT the switch case OPTION_TWO_WITH_PRE_ACTION: doPreActionStuff2(); // the default is to CONTINUE to next case case OPTION_TWO: doSomeStuff2(); break; // EXIT the switch case OPTION_THREE: doSomeStuff3(); break; // EXIT the switch } Now all you know that break statements are required, because the switch will continue to the next case when break statement is missing. We have an example of that with OPTION_LIKE_ONE, OPTION_ONE_SIMILAR and OPTION_TWO_WITH_PRE_ACTION. The problem is that we only need this "skip to next case" very very very rarely. And very often we put break at the end of case. It very easy for a beginner to forget about it. And one of my C teachers even explained it to us as if it was a bug in C language (don't want to talk about it :) I would like to ask if there are any other languages that I don't know of (or forgot about) that handle switch/case like this: switch (someValue) { case OPTION_ONE: continue; // CONTINUE to next case case OPTION_LIKE_ONE: continue; // CONTINUE to next case case OPTION_ONE_SIMILAR: doSomeStuff1(); // the default is to EXIT the switch case OPTION_TWO_WITH_PRE_ACTION: doPreActionStuff2(); continue; // CONTINUE to next case case OPTION_TWO: doSomeStuff2(); // the default is to EXIT the switch case OPTION_THREE: doSomeStuff3(); // the default is to EXIT the switch } The second question: is there any historical meaning to why it is like this in C? May be continue to next case was used far more often than we use it these days ?

    Read the article

  • javascript - switch not working

    - by Fernando SBS
    function FM_log(level, text) { // caso não seja log total escolhe o que loga var log = false; switch (level) { case "addtoprio()":log = true; case "alternaTropas()":log = false; case "sendtroops()":log = false; defalt: log = false; } if ((logTotal == false) && (log == true)) GM_log(horaAtual() + " - "+level+", "+text); else if (logTotal == true) GM_log(horaAtual() + " - "+level+", "+text); } how to do that switch is a way it works?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >