Search Results

Search found 20448 results on 818 pages for 'ip address'.

Page 70/818 | < Previous Page | 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77  | Next Page >

• How to forward UDP and TCP traffic from one IP to another

  - by Rishabh Agnihotri

  Well i have a server with two LAN Card Installed.I have a server in U.S and one in India.I have created a GRE tunnel to route all traffic from U.S Server to my Indian Server.My Traffic has UDP,TCP,HTTP,etc Traffic.Now i have two LAN Card on my Indian Server.Well i have configured two IPs on the system for some of my needs on the system.One is a /30 and another is a /24.Well now i want the /30 IP to talk to my /24 IP.Lets take a e.g the IPs are 180.151.130.34 - /30 and 103.243.19.254 -/24 I want to forward all the TCP,UDP,HTTP,etc like traffic coming to 180.151.130.34 to 103.243.19.254.In the sense i want to make them talk to each other in a way if a TCP/UDP Packet comes to 180.151.130.34 it should be forwarded to 103.243.19.254 and then that packet is sent back by 103.243.19.254 to 180.151.130.34.I am not able to configure this part.Can anyone tell me step by step how to do so? Well i forgot to specify i am using Windows Server 2008. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Postfix "loops back to myself" error on relay to another IP address on same machine

  - by Nic Wolff

  I'm trying to relay all mail for one domain "ourdomain.tld" from Postfix running on port 2525 of one interface to another SMTP server running on port 25 of another interface on the same machine. However, when a message is received for that domain, we're getting a "mail for loops back to myself" error. Below are netstat and postconf, the contents of our /etc/postfix/transport file, and the error that Postfix is logging. (The high bytes of each IP address are XXXed out.) Am I missing something obvious? Thanks - # netstat -ln -A inet Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State ... tcp 0 0 XXX.XXX.138.209:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 XXX.XXX.138.210:2525 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN # postconf -d | grep mail_version mail_version = 2.8.4 # postconf -n alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases allow_mail_to_commands = alias,forward bounce_queue_lifetime = 0 command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/lib/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 default_privs = nobody default_process_limit = 200 html_directory = no inet_interfaces = XXX.XXX.138.210 local_recipient_maps = local_transport = error:local mail delivery is disabled mail_owner = postfix mailbox_size_limit = 0 mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq manpage_directory = /usr/local/man message_size_limit = 10240000 mydestination = mydomain = ourdomain.tld myhostname = ourdomain.tld mynetworks = XXX.XXX.119.0/24, XXX.XXX.138.0/24, XXX.XXX.136.128/25 myorigin = ourdomain.tld newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix readme_directory = /etc/postfix recipient_delimiter = + relay_domains = ourdomain.tld relay_recipient_maps = sample_directory = /etc/postfix sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail setgid_group = postdrop smtpd_authorized_verp_clients = $mynetworks smtpd_recipient_limit = 10000 transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 450 # cat /etc/postfix/transport ourdomain.tld relay:[XXX.XXX.138.209]:25 # tail -f /var/log/maillog ... Aug 2 23:58:36 va4 postfix/smtp[9846]: 9858A758404: to=<nicwolff@... >, relay=XXX.XXX.138.209[XXX.XXX.138.209]:25, delay=1.1, delays=0.08/0.01/1/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for [XXX.XXX.138.209]:25 loops back to myself)

  Read the article

• Is 192.168.122.1 a valid IP?

  - by Louise Hoffman

  From my understanding the networks is as follows Class A: 10.0.0.1 - 10.255.255.254 Class B: 172.16.0.1 - 172.16.255.254 Class C: 192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.254 But then I look at ifconfig virbr0 on my Linux computer: virbr0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 42:40:99:CB:02:7F inet addr:192.168.122.1 Bcast:192.168.122.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:2842 (2.7 KiB) Here the IP address is 192.168.122.1. Is that an allowed IP? And if so, is 192.168 than actually a Class B network?

  Read the article

• iPhone always assigned wrong ip

  - by Ashley Ray

  for some reason most of the time my iPhone connects to the home network the ip address seems wrongly assigned as it 'loses connection' even even with strong reception. If I change the ip address to a static from 168.2.10 to 168.2.15 works fine until it appears to renew back to the prior. I am using a power-plug extender from the modem to router. Then have a laptop Printer playstation tv and another iPhone that always connect fine. The modem also has a crappy wireless which I haven't connected any devices to. I'm sure the forum will have a simple answer!

  Read the article

• Metro Apps on Windows 8 aren't working with static IP behind auth proxy

  - by Kamal

  In Windows 8 Professional, Metro Apps and Windows Update do not work with static IP settings behind authenticated proxy server. They work with DHCP on the same proxy settings (we have DHCP for wifi and static IP for LAN, both using the same proxy server). IE, Chrome and other desktop apps work nicely with both. Metro apps worked with an auth proxy (DHCP only), when I changed their proxy settings from the "edit group policy" option: Start → Settings → Edit Group Policy → Computer Configuration → Administrative Templates → Network Isolation → Internet Proxy for Apps How can I fix this?

  Read the article

• IP Connflict on network

  - by PSU_Kardi

  I keep getting an IP conflict on my home network and can't figure out why. I'm running a Belkin-N wireless router that has an Ethernet connection to my 360 and a wireless connection running to my laptop. It's WPA2 encryption and I have a nice password on my router consisting of letters , numbers and special characters. But for some reason I keep getting IP conflicts at night time...By the time I look into the problem I don't see anyone else on the network. Is my router giving me false positives?

  Read the article

• Accessing Windows from Linux/Mac by name using TCP/IP

  - by stevekuo

  What are some solutions to access Windows by its computer name from Linux and Mac using TCP/IP. That is, from terminal I want to be able to ping my Windows PCs using its host name. My setup is: Various machines running Ubuntu, Windows XP and OS X. Networked using a consumer grade wireless router which provides DHCP. The only DNS is the ISP's, which resolves Internet names and not local host names. The Windows machines can ping each other by name. The Ubuntu and OS X machines can only ping Windows by IP address (name doesn't work).

  Read the article

• htaccess IP blocking with custom 403 Error not working

  - by mrc0der

  I'm trying to block everyone but 1 IP address from my site on a server running apache & centos. My setup is follows the example below. My server: `http://www.myserver.com/` My .htaccess file <limit GET> order deny,allow deny from all allow from 176.219.192.141 </limit> ErrorDocument 403 http://www.google.com ErrorDocument 404 http://www.google.com When I visit http://www.myserver.com/ from an invalid IP, it gives me a generic 403 error. When I visit http://www.myserver.com/page-does-not-exist/ it redirects me correctly to http://www.google.com but I can't figure out why the 403 error doesn't redirect me too. Anyone have any ideas?

  Read the article

• Bind telnetd to specific IP on AIX 5.3?

  - by Sama

  Is it possible to bind telnetd to a specific IP on AIX 5.3? I know telnet is evil. Unfortunately, we have to have it listening on one interface for a specific application, but I want to make sure that's the only interface/IP that it's listening on. I have been searching all over the net and have found some advice for Linux, but it doesn't appear to be applicable to AIX. Full disclosure: I am not the server admin, but I am working closely with them and am familiar with *nix. Add: This is an internal server, which is connected to two different vlans. This is NOT connected to the Internet(!).

  Read the article

• ldirectord ipvsadm not show reals ip and not work wtih pacemaker and corosync

  - by miguer27

  first thanks for your time. I'm having a problem with ldirectord that I can not solve, I comment my situation: I have two nodes with pace maker and corosync and configure somes resources: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# crm status Last updated: Tue Jun 3 12:58:30 2014 Last change: Tue Jun 3 12:23:47 2014 via cibadmin on ldap1 Stack: openais Current DC: ldap2 - partition with quorum Version: 1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes 7 Resources configured. Online: [ ldap1 ldap2 ] Resource Group: IPV_LVS IPV_4 (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started ldap1 IPV_6 (ocf::heartbeat:IPv6addr): Started ldap1 lvs (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord): Started ldap1 Clone Set: clon_IPV_lo [IPV_lo] Started: [ ldap2 ] Stopped: [ IPV_lo:1 ] root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# crm configure show node ldap2 \ attributes standby="off" node ldap1 \ attributes standby="off" primitive IPV-lo_4 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr \ params ip="192.168.1.10" cidr_netmask="32" nic="lo" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV-lo_6 ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addrLO \ params ipv6addr="[fc00:1::3]" cidr_netmask="64" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV_4 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \ params ip="192.168.1.10" nic="eth0" cidr_netmask="25" lvs_support="true" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV_6 ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addr \ params ipv6addr="[fc00:1::3]" nic="eth0" cidr_netmask="64" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive lvs ocf:heartbeat:ldirectord \ params configfile="/etc/ldirectord.cf" \ op monitor interval="20" timeout="10" \ meta target-role="Started" group IPV_LVS IPV_4 IPV_6 lvs group IPV_lo IPV-lo_6 IPV-lo_4 clone clon_IPV_lo IPV_lo \ meta interleave="true" target-role="Started" location cli-prefer-IPV_LVS IPV_LVS \ rule $id="cli-prefer-rule-IPV_LVS" inf: #uname eq ldap1 colocation LVS_no_IPV_lo -inf: clon_IPV_lo IPV_LVS property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff" \ cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ expected-quorum-votes="2" \ no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ stonith-enabled="false" \ last-lrm-refresh="1401264327" rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \ resource-stickiness="1000" The problem is in the ipvsadm only show a one real IP, when i configured two now, show the ldirector.cf: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# ipvsadm IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP ldap-maqueta.cica.es:ldap wrr - ldap2.cica.es:ldap Route 4 0 0 TCP [[fc00:1::3]]:ldap wrr - [[fc00:1::2]]:ldap Route 4 0 0 root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# cat /etc/ldirectord.cf checktimeout=10 checkinterval=2 autoreload=yes logfile="/var/log/ldirectord.log" quiescent=yes #ipv4 virtual=192.168.1.10:389 real=192.168.1.11:389 gate 4 real=192.168.1.12:389 gate 4 scheduler=wrr protocol=tcp checktype=on #ipv6 virtual6=[[fc00:1::3]]:389 real6=[[fc00:1::1]]:389 gate 4 real6=[[fc00:1::2]]:389 gate 4 scheduler=wrr protocol=tcp checkport=389 checktype=on and in the logs I see nothing clear: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# ldirectord -d /etc/ldirectord.cf start DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.11:389 -g -w 0) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.11:389 -g -w 0) DEBUG2: Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) DEBUG2: Disabled real server=on:tcp:192.168.1.11:389:::4:gate:\/: (virtual=tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 0) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 0) DEBUG2: Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) DEBUG2: Disabled real server=on:tcp:192.168.1.12:389:::4:gate:\/: (virtual=tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Checking on: Real servers are added without any checks DEBUG2: Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) Destination already exists root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# cat /var/log/ldirectord.log [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) failed: [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Added real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.11:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Restored real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: [[fc00:1::2]]:389 (tcp:[[fc00:1::3]]:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t [[fc00:1::3]]:389 -r [[fc00:1::2]]:389 -g -w 4) failed: [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Added real server: [[fc00:1::2]]:389 ([[fc00:1::3]]:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: [[fc00:1::1]]:389 (tcp:[[fc00:1::3]]:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Restored real server: [[fc00:1::1]]:389 ([[fc00:1::3]]:389) (Weight set to 4) do not know if this is a bug or a configuration error, can anyone help? Regards.

  Read the article

• How to renew dhcp ip address in ubuntu?

  - by elviejo

  This is a simple question in ubuntu server How do I renew a dhcp assigned IP address?

  Read the article

• IP Address vs MAC addresses

  - by Codenotguru

  why do we need ip addresses if mac address is enough to identify the machine???

  Read the article

• Sonicwall NSA 3500, public ip for SSL VPN clients is not visible

  - by SlyMcFly

  I have a Sonciwall NSA 3500 and I'm setting up the SSL VPN according to this guide. I get through setting up the Sonicwall router, but then to test it says "Users can now go to the public IP of the sonicwall. Notice the new “click here for SSL login” hyper link". However, when I go to the public ip of the Sonicwall I don't get a web page, it just times out. Is there some other setting that I'm missing in order to make the SSL VPN login page public?

  Read the article

• What are the IPv6 Public and Private and Reserved ranges

  - by vipin raj

  I just want to know what are all the public IPv6 ranges which ISPs or other users can use? Also need a list of addresses which can be used in private networks and also the list of addresses which never can be used in any network. I have been searching through different web sites. But none gives a reliable answer. Actually we are developing an application which allows user to plan their IP address(create supernets, subnets, hosts, assign host to ports etc). So my application should be able to distinguish between all kinds of address ranges, whether it is reserved, public, private, multicast etc

  Read the article

• Sending email with exim and external sender address

  - by Tronic

  hi. i have following problem: i want to send emails with an rails webapp. i set up an exim server and when looking into the logs, the sending works, but the emails aren't sent really. i had the same problem with another isp. the sender address is hosted on another mailserver, other isp. i think the problem is, that sending doesn't work because the sener address isn't hosted on the same server. do you have any advice on this? the logs (exim) tell me the following: 2011-01-01 14:38:06 1PZ1eo-0000Ga-38 <= <> R=1PZ1eo-0000GY-1p U=Debian-exim P=local S=1778 2011-01-01 14:38:08 1PZ1eo-0000Ga-38 => [email protected] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=mx1.emailsrvr.com [98.129.184.131] X=TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32 DN="C=US,O=mx1.emailsrvr.com,OU=GT21850092,OU=See www.geotrust.com/resources/cps (c)08,OU=Domain Control Validated - QuickSSL(R),CN=mx1.emailsrvr.com" 2011-01-01 14:38:08 1PZ1eo-0000Ga-38 Completed [email protected] is the external sender-address! thank you!

  Read the article

• Remote desktop to multiple windows machines on a LAN with dynamic IP

  - by kevyn

  Is it possible to use remote desktop to connect to multiple computers inside a network that has a dynamic IP address? I use a netgear WPN824 router which has dyndns onboard - but I currently use No-IP to control a single computer that I use most frequently. Every so often I need to get onto a couple of other computers in the network, but don't know how to go about this without logging onto one computer, and then starting another RDC session from that machine. What I would like to be able to do is connect to my router, and be able to see a list of connected devices, and then choose which to remote desktop onto. - I appreciate this probably is not be possible, but any other suggestions are welcome!

  Read the article

• IPTABLE & IP-routed netwok solution for HOST net and VM's subnet

  - by Daniel

  I've got ProxmoxVE2.1 ruled KVM node on Debian and bunch of VM's guests machine. That is how my networking looks like: # network interface settings auto lo iface lo inet loopback # device: eth0 auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 175.219.59.209 gateway 175.219.59.193 netmask 255.255.255.224 post-up echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp And I've got two working subnet solution auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 10.10.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 bridge_ports none bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 post-up ip route add 10.10.0.1/24 dev vmbr0 This way I can reach internet, to resolve outside hosts, update and download everything I need but can't reach one guest VM out of any other VM's inside my network. The second solution allows me to communicate between VM's: auto vmbr1 iface vmbr1 inet static address 10.10.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 bridge_ports none bridge_stp off bridge_fd 0 post-up echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward post-up iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s '10.10.0.0/24' -o vmbr1 -j MASQUERADE post-down iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s '10.10.0.0/24' -o vmbr1 -j MASQUERADE I can even NAT internal addresses: -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 789 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.10.0.220:345 My inexperienced mind is ready to double VM's net adapters: one for the first solution and another - for second (with slightly different adresses) but I'm pretty sure that it's a dumb way to resolve the problem and everything can be resolved via iptables/ip route rules that I can't create. I've tried a dozen of "wizard manuals" and "howto's" to mix both solution but without success. Looking for an advice (and good reading links for networking begginers).

  Read the article

• Windows Server 2008 Static IP Address

  - by Gauls

  I have Win 2008 Server VM and want to set static IP address so that i can RDP into instead of using VM player (mouse gets out of focus as the size of the VM increases). Now while making the changes i see two TC/IPv6 and TC/IPv4 i try changing the IPaddress from obtain autimatically, but it always goes to "Unidentified Network". If i leave it to automatically obtain IP,i still cannot RDP into it. I have tired disabling TC/IPv6 from reistry. Any other suggestions? BTW the same setting works fine with WIN XP and i can RDP into all Win XP VM's Cheers Gauls

  Read the article

• OS X server VPN local ip

  - by gbrandt

  Hi all, I have 10.6.2 server on the internet. I want to vpn into it to get access. I start VPN and it gives me an address in the range I have set 192.168.2.100-192.168.2.105. However the server itself does not have a local ip of 192.168.2.x so I cannot ping it or ssh into it or anything. The machine VPNing gets an ifconfig entry that looks like this: ppp0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1280 inet 192.168.2.100 --> 70.72.xxx.xxx netmask 0xffffff00 Where I think it should get: ppp0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1280 inet 192.168.2.100 --> 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 I can't find anywhere to set the local vpn IP address. And I can't find a pptpd.conf file either. Any help is appreciated.

  Read the article

• Filtering Client IP from Access Log for Urchin

  - by Ram Prasad

  I have some apache logs to process, and since the webserver behind two levels of reverse proxies, I am getting two IPs in the X-Forwarded-For header.. for example: 208.34.234.55, 127.0.0.1 - - [29/Oct/2009:21:38:13 -0500] "GET /monkey.html HTTP/1.0" 200 20845 0 0 "http://www.monkey.com/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.15) Gecko/2009101601 Firefox/3.0.15 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)" Now, how do I filter this in Urchin (or remove this in Apache logging) so, 127.0.0.1 is removed from processing. Currently urchin is not able to recognize the multuple IP address so it does not log the remote IP

  Read the article

• Chrome: automatically redirect me to highest ranking search result, like Firefox does

  - by Siim K

  How to emulate the Firefox (I'm using v3.6) address bar search redirection in Google Chrome? For example, if I type... imdb moon ...to the address bar and press Return in Firefox then it redirects me straight to http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1182345/ (and I've not visited the page before) When I try this is Chrome then I just get the google search page http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=imdb+moon So seems like Firefox redirects automatically to the highest ranking search result URL - is there a setting or add-on for Chrome to achieve the same behaviour?

  Read the article

• Retrieve malicious IP addresses from Apache logs and block them with iptables

  - by Gabriel Talavera

  Im trying to keep away some attackers that try to exploit XSS vulnerabilities from my website, I have found that most of the malicious attempts start with a classic "alert(document.cookie);\" test. The site is not vulnerable to XSS but I want to block the offending IP addresses before they found a real vulnerability, also, to keep the logs clean. My first thought is to have a script constantly checking in the Apache logs all IP addresses that start with that probe and send those addresses to an iptables drop rule. With something like this: cat /var/log/httpd/-access_log | grep "alert(document.cookie);" | awk '{print $1}' | uniq Why would be an effective way to send the output of that command to iptables? Thanks in advance for any input!

  Read the article

• port forwarding using 3 static ip addresses

  - by Danny

  I am new to configuring routers. We have purchased a RV016 Cisco business router that has multiwan capability. What we are attempting to do is take map services from 3 different servers and assign 3 different static IP addresses and then forward port 80 through the router. A short term solution to building a proxy server. Is this possible? Right now we have a consumer grade Cisco router and assign a static IP and it works, we attempted the same settings on the business router and cannot get to the internet. We set it DHCP and it works fine, however we want to to forward the static ports not use DHCP.

  Read the article

• Why is it a bad idea to use a customer email as the from address

  - by Crab Bucket

  I've got an application that emails users once they have filled in a form. It uses a [email protected] as a from address. The customer wants it to use the email from the form as the from address which could be anything. I have been told that this is a bad idea due to spoofing/blacklisting and spam. I feel really vague about the exact reason about why this is a bad idea particularly as i've got to try to counsel the client out of this. Can someone explain to me why this is a bad idea. Interestingly the client has used a gmail account as the from address as a demo which not only works fine but has enabled the application to start sending emails (it wouldn't do it before with an email which was [email protected]). Erm - what is going on. I'm told one thing and the opposite works. Sorry - i know this is basic but I could find anything on a google search. Largely I think because I'm having trouble even framing the question. EDIT Thank you everyone - great answers. Interestingly the server sending the email and the mail box that it is going to are both behind the same firewall so the client says they are unconcerned about spam. Oh well.

  Read the article

• How to set a static route for an external IP address

  - by HorusKol

  Further to my earlier question about bridging different subnets - I now need to route requests for one particular IP address differently to all other traffic. I have the following routing in my iptables on our router: # Allow established connections, and those !not! coming from the public interface # eth0 = public interface # eth1 = private interface #1 (10.1.1.0/24) # eth2 = private interface #2 (129.2.2.0/25) iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW ! -i eth0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth2 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT # Allow outgoing connections from the private interfaces iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth2 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT # Allow the two private connections to talk to each other iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth2 -j ACCEPT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth2 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT # Masquerade (NAT) iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE # Don't forward any other traffic from the public to the private iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -j REJECT iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth2 -j REJECT This configuration means that users will be forwarded through a modem/router with a public address - this is all well and good for most purposes, and in the main it doesn't matter that all computers are hidden behind the one public IP. However, some users need to be able to access a proxy at 192.111.222.111:8080 - and the proxy needs to identify this traffic as coming through a gateway at 129.2.2.126 - it won't respond otherwise. I tried adding a static route on our local gateway with: route add -host 192.111.222.111 gw 129.2.2.126 dev eth2 I can successfully ping 192.111.222.111 from the router. When I trace the route, it lists the 129.2.2.126 gateway, but I just get * on each of the following hops (I think this makes sense since this is just a web-proxy and requires authentication). When I try to ping this address from a host on the 129.2.2.0/25 network it fails. Should I do this in the iptables chain instead? How would I configure this routing?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77  | Next Page >