Search Results

Search found 15743 results on 630 pages for 'js is bad'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 71/630 | < Previous Page | 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78  | Next Page >

  • Query parameter using JS framework ?

    - by Maxim Veksler
    Hi, I seem to not be able to find implementation from the common Ajax libraries (JQuery, mootools, prototypejs...) that would allow the operation of parsing the window.location.href for request parameter. I would expect something like: $P{"param1"} == "param1_value" Am I missing something? p.s. The web does contains implementation examples for such operations

    Read the article

  • Naked Objects. Good or Bad

    - by Midhat
    I have recently been exposed to naked objects. It looks like a pretty decent framework. However I do not see it in widespread use like say, Spring. So why is this framework not getting any mainstream application credit. What are its shortcomings as you see?

    Read the article

  • Good or Bad experiences with CryptoLicensing?

    - by dr. evil
    I'm planning to buy CryptoLicensing but before buying it I'd like to get some feedbacks if anyone tried it before. Also it'd be interesting if anyone cracked it or spotted an easy hack against it. I've seen some other SO questions regarding the choosing a .NET licensing component but if you currently happy with another component it'd be nice to hear your experience. It's just quite hard to nail this without going through a long trial.

    Read the article

  • Alligator tags(<% %>) inside js string?

    - by bangoker
    I am trying to redirect a page reading the url from the config file. However, when I try this: <script type="text/javascript"> <%string redirectUrl = System.Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager.AppSettings["RedirectURL"];%> window.parent.location.replace("<%=redirectUrl%>"); </script> the alligator tags <% % are Not being highlighted, and when I run I get the following error in the yellow screen: the controls collection cannot be modified because the control contains code blocks (i.e. <% ... %>). What am I doing wrong?? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • EXC_BAD_ACCESS from AudioBuffer

    - by jfalexvijay
    I am trying to do the record using AudioUnit for iPhone app. Changes: (start) I have added the following code bufferList = (AudioBufferList *)malloc(sizeof(AudioBuffer)); bufferList-mNumberBuffers = 1; bufferList-mBuffers[0].mNumberChannels = 2; bufferList-mBuffers[0].mDataByteSize = 1024; bufferList-mBuffers[0].mData = calloc(256, sizeof(uint32_t)); Changes: (end) static OSStatus recordingCallback(void *inRefCon, AudioUnitRenderActionFlags *ioActionFlags, const AudioTimeStamp *inTimeStamp, UInt32 inBusNumber, UInt32 inNumberFrames, AudioBufferList *ioData) { OSStatus status; status = AudioUnitRender(appdelegate-audioUnit, ioActionFlags, inTimeStamp, inBusNumber, inNumberFrames, appdelegate-bufferList); if(status != 0) NSLog(@"AudioUnitRender status is %d", status); SInt16* samples = (SInt16*)(ioData-mBuffers[0].mData); ..... } fixed: (I am getting OSStatus -50 error code)- Because I didn't initialize the bufferList. I am EXC_BAD_ACCESS from AudioBuffer (ioData-mBuffers[0].mData). I am not sure with this error. Please help me to resolve it.

    Read the article

  • Javascript object encapsulation that tracks changes

    - by Raynos
    Is it possible to create an object container where changes can be tracked Said object is a complex nested object of data. (compliant with JSON). The wrapper allows you to get the object, and save changes, without specifically stating what the changes are Does there exist a design pattern for this kind of encapsulation Deep cloning is not an option since I'm trying to write a wrapper like this to avoid doing just that. The solution of serialization should only be considered if there are no other solutions. An example of use would be var foo = state.get(); // change state state.update(); // or state.save(); client.tell(state.recentChange()); A jsfiddle snippet might help : http://jsfiddle.net/Raynos/kzKEp/ It seems like implementing an internal hash to keep track of changes is the best option. [Edit] To clarify this is actaully done on node.js on the server. The only thing that changes is that the solution can be specific to the V8 implementation.

    Read the article

  • JS variable scope missunderstanding

    - by meo
    I have a little problem: slideHelpers.total = 4 for (i=1;i <= slideHelpers.total; i++) { $('<a href="#">' + i + '</a>').bind('click', function(){ alert('go to the ' + i + ' slide')}).appendTo('.slideaccess') } the alert gives out 5 what is logic, because when the function click triggers i is actually 5. But i would like to have the same i as in my <a> tag. What is the best way to handle this? I could put i in the data() of the <a> tag for example but i am sure there is a easier way.

    Read the article

  • Kill unload function in JS?

    - by Newbie
    Hello! Is there a way to kill the unload function with javascript(jquery)? I am looking for something like this: window.onbeforeunload = function(){ confirm("Close?") } or in jquery: $(window).unload(function() { confirm("close?") }); Now, on window unload I get my confirm alert but it will continue in any case. Clicking cancel it won't stay on my page. Can U help me plz?

    Read the article

  • passing dynamic values in callback method

    - by swastican
    is there a way to pass dynamic values to callback function in js or jquery or nodejs. for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++) { filename = 'file'+i+'.html'; request(url, function(error, response, body) { test(error, response, body, filename); }); function test(error, response, body, filename) { console.log('file name ' + filename); if(response.statusCode == 200){ console.log('done'); } } I refered this so article for passing values to callback function. link: [JavaScript: Passing parameters to a callback function the output always seems to be 9 How can i pass values dynamically? The callback function always refers the last value of filename.

    Read the article

  • A brief question about JS or AJAX

    - by Luke
    I have been finding ways around this for a long time but think it's time I addressed it. If I have a page that has a dropdown menu, is there anyway I can select a value which will subsequently load other values further down. Can this be done without a page reload? I will give you an example. Say I was making some tools for an admin panel, but first of all they needed to select a member to work with. They would select the member and then below, the fields about that member would be populated based on what was selected in the first menu. As I have already asked, can this be done without a page reload? Thanks for reading.

    Read the article

  • Make sure bad patterns don't come back after refactoring

    - by Let_Me_Be
    I'm refactoring an old C code. The code has absolutely no layered architecture (everything is being accessed by everything) and I'm trying to change that. I would like to cut direct access to structure members (at least write for now) and only allow access through access functions. Is there some tool (or perhaps directly the compiler) that could check this rule for me? I need this since I'm maintaining a fork and the upstream isn't very concerned with code quality.

    Read the article

  • Is catching NumberFormatException a bad practice?

    - by integeruser
    I have to parse a String that can assume hex values or other non-hex values 0xff, 0x31 or A, PC, label, and so on. I use this code to divide the two cases: String input = readInput(); try { int hex = Integer.decode(input); // use hex ... } catch (NumberFormatException e) { // input is not a hex, continue parsing } Can this code be considered "ugly" or difficult to read? Are there other (maybe more elegant) solutions? EDIT : I want to clarify that (in my case) a wrong input doesn't exist: i just need to distinguish if it is a hex number, or not. And just for completeness, i'm making a simple assebler for DCPU-16.

    Read the article

  • iPad search bar bad memory access?

    - by Geoff Baum
    Hello all, So I am trying to implement a search bar in my app and am very close but can't seem to figure out where this memory error is occurring. This is what part of my search method looks like: filters = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; NSString *searchText = detailSearch.text; NSMutableArray *searchArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; // Normally holds the object (ex: 70 locations) searchArray = self.copyOfFilters ; //This is the line that is breaking after ~2-3 letters are entered in the search for (NSString *sTemp in searchArray) { NSRange titleResultsRange = [sTemp rangeOfString:searchText options:NSCaseInsensitiveSearch]; if (titleResultsRange.length > 0) [filters addObject:sTemp]; } displayedFilters = filters; copyOfFilters is a deep copy of the displayed filters that appear when the view first loads via: self.copyOfFilters = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithArray:displayedFilters copyItems:YES]; I have traced through the entry of letters and it is accurate after 2 letters, but once you try and enter a letter after a space in the search bar, it crashes. The value of copyOfFilters = {(int)[$VAR count]} objects. Does anyone know what may be causing this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Force download through markup or JS

    - by mschoening
    Lets assume I have a file on a CDN (Cloud Files from Rackspace) and a static html page with a link to that file. Is there any way I can force download this file (to prevent it from opening in the browser -- for mp3s for example)? We could make our server read the file and set the corresponding header to: header("Content-Type: application/force-download") but we have about 5 million downloads per month so we would rather let the CDN take care of that. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Issue pushing object into an array JS

    - by Javacadabra
    I'm having an issue placing an object into my array in javascript. This is the code: $('.confirmBtn').click(function(){ //Get reference to the Value in the Text area var comment = $("#comments").val(); //Create Object var orderComment = { 'comment' : comment }; //Add Object to the Array productArray.push(orderComment); //update cookie $.cookie('order_cookie', JSON.stringify(productArray), { expires: 1, path: '/' }); }); However when I print the array this is the output: Array ( [0] => Array ( [stockCode] => CBL202659/A [quantity] => 8 ) [1] => Array ( [stockCode] => CBL201764 [quantity] => 6 ) [2] => TEST TEST ) I would like it to look like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( [stockCode] => CBL202659/A [quantity] => 8 ) [1] => Array ( [stockCode] => CBL201764 [quantity] => 6 ) [2] Array( [comment] => TEST TEST ) I added products to the array in a similar way and it worked fine: var productArray = []; // Will hold order Items $(".orderBtn").click(function(event){ //Check to ensure quantity > 0 if(quantity == 0){ console.log("Quantity must be greater than 0") }else{//It is so continue //Show the order Box $(".order-alert").show(); event.preventDefault(); //Get reference to the product clicked var stockCode = $(this).closest('li').find('.stock_code').html(); //Get reference to the quantity selected var quantity = $(this).closest('li').find('.order_amount').val(); //Order Item (contains stockCode and Quantity) - Can add whatever data I like here var orderItem = { 'stockCode' : stockCode, 'quantity' : quantity }; //Check if cookie exists if($.cookie('order_cookie') === undefined){ console.log("Creating new cookie"); //Add object to the Array productArray.push(orderItem);

    Read the article

  • Is inheritance bad nowadays?

    - by mafutrct
    Personally, I think inheritance is a great tool, that, when applied reasonably, can greatly simplify code. However, I seems to me that many modern tools dislike inheritance. Let's take a simple example: Serialize a class to XML. As soon as inheritance is involved, this can easily turn into a mess. Especially if you're trying to serialize a derived class using the base class serializer. Sure, we can work around that. Something like a KnownType attribute and stuff. Besides being an itch in your code that you have to remember to update every time you add a derived class, that fails, too, if you receive a class from outside your scope that was not known at compile time. (Okay, in some cases you can still work around that, for instance using the NetDataContract serializer in .NET. Surely a certain advancement.) In any case, the basic principle still exists: Serialization and inheritance don't mix well. Considering the huge list of programming strategies that became possible and even common in the past decade, I feel tempted to say that inheritance should be avoided in areas that relate to serialization (in particular remoting and databases). Does that make sense? Or am messing things up? How do you handle inheritance and serialization?

    Read the article

  • PHP or JS to connect with fingerprint scanner save to database

    - by narong
    I have a project to set profile user and save all data to database include fingerprint also. i don't what i should start, I have USB finger scanner already to test. What i think: i should have a input box to read data from USB finger scanner than i should create a function to upload it database. but with this thinking i meet problem: i don't know data that get from USB finger scanner is image or data? if image, how i can read it to input box to save to database ? Anyone have any idea, please share me to resolve it. I am looking to see your helping soon! thanks

    Read the article

  • Angular.js: value() not injected in config()

    - by Nik
    I am having trouble getting the value() injected into the app.config(). Here's the code (coffeescript) window.app = angular.module("app", []) app.value("template_path", "assets/angular/templates/users") app.config(["$routeProvider","template_path" ($routeProvider, template_path) -> console.log template_path it is throwing an "Unknown provider: template_path from app" error Could it be that the config() method cannot be injected with value() set values? I am using 1.0.2 Thank you!

    Read the article

  • [DOM/JS] display table in IE

    - by budzor
    I have code like that: var xPola = 10, //how many cols yPola = 10, //how many cols bokPola = 30, //size of cell body = document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]; var tablica = document.createElement('table'); body.appendChild(tablica); for( var y = 0; y < yPola; y++ ) { var rzad = document.createElement('tr'); tablica.appendChild(rzad); for( var x = 0; x < xPola; x++ ) { var pole = document.createElement('td'); pole.setAttribute('width', bokPola); pole.setAttribute('height', bokPola); rzad.appendChild(pole); } }; it works fine in FF, Chrome & Opera (it displays 10x10 table with 30px width&height rows). In IE nothing happens. I check in firebug lite and it is in HTML section, inside BODY tag but i see nothing. Whats wrong?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78  | Next Page >