Search Results

Search found 6205 results on 249 pages for 'linq to nhibernate'.

Page 74/249 | < Previous Page | 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81  | Next Page >

  • Linq-To-Sql equivalent for this sql query...

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    I thus far used concatenated Id string like 1,2,3 and updated in my table using this query... if exists( select ClientId from Clients where ClientId IN (SELECT i.items FROM dbo.Splitfn(@Id,',') AS i)) begin update Clients set IsDeleted=1 where ClientId IN (SELECT i.items FROM dbo.Splitfn(@Id,',') AS i) select 'deleted' as message end What is the linq-to-sql equivalent for the above query? Any suggestion...

    Read the article

  • LINQ to group objects according to timestamp

    - by Benny
    I have a serial of object defined as: public class Foo { public DateTime Time {get;set;} } now I want to group objects(IEnumerable<Foo>) according to the time, e.g. I want to group them according to hour or day or month. for example (group into hour): group 1(13:00-14:00) : foo1, foo2, foo3 group 2(14:00-15:00): foo4, foo5 How to write LINQ over this? hope I made myself clear.

    Read the article

  • Combining Variable Numbers of Lists w/ LINQ

    - by Anthony Compton
    I have a list (List) of objects. Each of those objects contains a list (List) of strings describing them. I'm needing to create a dropdown containing all of the distinct strings used to describe the objects (Cards). To do this, I need a list of distinct strings used. Any idea how/if this can be done with LINQ?

    Read the article

  • LINQ VB.NET variable not found when looping through grouped query

    - by Ed Sneller
    I'm trying to do the following LINQ grouping, which works in the debugger (the results are populated in the GroupedOrders object. But VS 2008 gives me the following error at design time... Name 'x' is not declared Dim GroupedOrders = (From m In thisConsultant.orders _ Group m By Key = m.commCode Into Group _ Select commCode = Key, orders = Group) For Each x In GroupedOrders Next VS 2008 gives me the following error,

    Read the article

  • Am I missing something about LINQ?

    - by Jason Baker
    I seem to be missing something about LINQ. To me, it looks like it's taking some of the elements of SQL that I like the least and moving them into the C# language and using them for other things. I mean, I could see the benefit of using SQL-like statements on things other than databases. But if I wanted to write SQL, well, why not just write SQL and keep it out of C#? What am I missing here?

    Read the article

  • LInq to sql query

    - by Mohit
    Hi, I have a sql query as follows: Declare @DivisionNo INT SET @DivisionNo = 5117 SELECT distinct CASE WHEN ISNULL([DivisionNo],'') < @DivisionNo THEN @DivisionNo ELSE [DivisionNo] END as DivisionNo --,[RecordID] ,[AcctCat] ,[AcctCatDesc] ,[CostCode] ,[CostCodeDesc] FROM [dbo].[vw_eSchdl_AcctCat_CostCode] WHERE DivisionNo = @DivisionNo UNION SELECT distinct CASE WHEN ISNULL([DivisionNo],'') < @DivisionNo THEN @DivisionNo ELSE [DivisionNo] END as DivisionNo --,[RecordID] ,[AcctCat] ,[AcctCatDesc] ,[CostCode] ,[CostCodeDesc] FROM [dbo].[vw_eSchdl_AcctCat_CostCode] WHERE AcctCat not in ( SELECT [AcctCat] FROM [dbo].[vw_eSchdl_AcctCat_CostCode] WHERE DivisionNo = @DivisionNo) How can I duplicate it using linq to sql? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Joins and subqueries in LINQ

    - by Brian
    I am trying to do a join with a sub query and can't seem to get it. Here is what is looks like working in sql. How do I get to to work in linq? SELECT po.*, p.PermissionID FROM PermissibleObjects po INNER JOIN PermissibleObjects_Permissions po_p ON (po.PermissibleObjectID = po_p.PermissibleObjectID) INNER JOIN Permissions p ON (po_p.PermissionID = p.PermissionID) LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT u_po.PermissionID, u_po.PermissibleObjectID FROM Users_PermissibleObjects u_po WHERE u_po.UserID = '2F160457-7355-4B59-861F-9871A45FD166' ) used ON (p.PermissionID = used.PermissionID AND po.PermissibleObjectID = used.PermissibleObjectID) WHERE used.PermissionID is null

    Read the article

  • switch linq syntax

    - by scrat789
    var folders = from r in this.bdd.Rights join f in this.bdd.Folders on r.RightFolderId equals f.FolderId join rs in this.bdd.RightSpecs on r.RightSpecId equals rs.SpecIdRight where r.RightUserId == userId where rs.SpecRead == true where rs.SpecWrite == true select f; How transform this linq query in the other syntax? var folders = this.bdd.Rights.Where(r => r.....

    Read the article

  • Linq Expression Trees in Compact Framework.

    - by Michal Drozdowicz
    The lack of expression trees in Compact Framework has bugged me for some time now, but I haven't really looked for a solution. Today, I've found a blog post about an alternative System.Linq.Expressions built on top of Mono System.Core and used e.g. by db4o (you can find it here). My question is - have you used this library and if so, what were your experiences with it (especially regarding performance)?

    Read the article

  • Dynamically set sproc name in Linq to SQL?

    - by Justin
    Hey, I need to dynamically set the sproc name of a Linq to SQL query and can't figure out how. I see in the dbml designer that the sproc name is an attribute but it must be a constant, so I can't set it to a dynamic value. Please help. Thanks, Justin

    Read the article

  • How are attached properties useful in LINQ?

    - by James Cadd
    I got this question during an interview in the past and never really dug into in, but I've put some thought into it lately and I can't come up with a good answer. When I think of attached properties my mind goes straight to UI related concepts - what benefits could be had in using attached properties with LINQ? I'm starting to think the answer is "they're not" unless I find out otherwise!

    Read the article

  • List to Columns in LINQ

    - by Sam Saffron
    Given an IEnumerable<T> and row count, I would like to convert it to an IEnumerable<IEnumerable<T>> like so: Input: Row Count: 3 List: [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] Output [ [1,4,7] [2,5] [3,6] ] How can I do this using LINQ?

    Read the article

  • Help With LINQ: Mixed Joins and Specifying Default Values

    - by Corey O.
    I am trying to figure out how to do a mixed-join in LINQ with specific access to 2 LINQ objects. Here is an example of how the actual TSQL query might look: SELECT * FROM [User] AS [a] INNER JOIN [GroupUser] AS [b] ON [a].[UserID] = [b].[UserID] INNER JOIN [Group] AS [c] ON [b].[GroupID] = [c].[GroupID] LEFT JOIN [GroupEntries] AS [d] ON [a].[GroupID] = [d].[GroupID] WHERE [a].[UserID] = @UserID At the end, basically what I would like is an enumerable object full of GroupEntry objects. What am interested is the last two tables/objects in this query. I will be displaying Groups as a group header, and all of the Entries underneath their group heading. If there are no entries for a group, I still want to see that group as a header without any entries. Here's what I have so far: So from that I'd like to make a function: public void DisplayEntriesByUser(int user_id) { MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext(); IEnumberable<GroupEntries> entries = ( from user in db.Users where user.UserID == user_id join group_user in db.GroupUsers on user.UserID = group_user.UserID into a from join1 in a join group in db.Groups on join1.GroupID equals group.GroupID into b from join2 in b join entry in db.Entries.DefaultIfEmpty() on join2.GroupID equals entry.GroupID select entry ); Group last_group_id = 0; foreach(GroupEntry entry in entries) { if (last_group_id == 0 || entry.GroupID != last_group_id) { last_group_id = entry.GroupID; System.Console.WriteLine("---{0}---", entry.Group.GroupName.ToString().ToUpper()); } if (entry.EntryID) { System.Console.WriteLine(" {0}: {1}", entry.Title, entry.Text); } } } The example above does not work quite as expected. There are 2 problems that I have not been able to solve: I still seem to be getting an INNER JOIN instead of a LEFT JOIN on the last join. I am not getting any empty results, so groups without entries do not appear. I need to figure out a way so that I can fill in the default values for blank sets of entries. That is, if there is a group without an entry, I would like to have a mostly blank entry returned, except that I'd want the EntryID to be null or 0, the GroupID to be that of of the empty group that it represents, and I'd need a handle on the entry.Group object (i.e. it's parent, empty Group object). Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Note: Table names and real-world representation were derived purely for this example, but their relations simplify what I'm trying to do.

    Read the article

  • Instantiate defined object with Linq Query

    - by Heinz
    I know that you can instantiate anonymous types with Linq but I am looking to instantiate an object I have already defined. Every time I do, all the properties are returned with their defaults (null, 0, etc.) Is there a way to make this work? I've tried something like this: ServiceDepartment[] serviceDepartments = (from d in departments orderby d.department_name select new ServiceDepartment { DepartmentID = d.department_id, DepartmentName = d.department_name }).ToArray();

    Read the article

  • Linq Queries converting to lambda expressions ?

    - by Freshblood
    Hello from item in range where item % 2 ==0 select i ; is converting to lamda expressions as below range.where(item % 2 ==0).select(x=>x). I feel that first way of linq is translating next one and if it is ,so is there any optimization like this range.where(item & 2 == 0) instead of other one ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81  | Next Page >