Search Results

Search found 7443 results on 298 pages for 'elements'.

Page 78/298 | < Previous Page | 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85  | Next Page >

  • Dynamically created jagged "rectangle" array

    - by gagar1n
    In my project I have a lot of code like this: int[][] a = new int[firstDimension][]; for (int i=0; i<firstDimension; i++) { a[i] = new int[secondDimension]; } Types of elements are different. Is there any way of writing a method like createArray(typeof(int), firstDimension, secondDimension); and getting new int[firstDimension][secondDimension]? Once again, type of elements is known only at runtime.

    Read the article

  • Confusion over C++ new operator and classes

    - by Nils
    Hi all I created a simple class in C++ which has a private dynamic array. In the constructor I initialize the array using new and in the destructor I free it using delete. When I instantiate the class using Class a = Class(..); it works as expected, however it seems I cannot instantiate it using the new operator (Like Class *a = new Class(..);), I always get a segmentation fault. What I don't understand is when I should use new to instantiate a class and when just call the constructor or should it be possible to instantiate a class either with new or by just calling the constructor. float** A = new float*[3]; for (int i=0; i<3; i++) { A[i] = new float[3]; } A[0][0] = 3; A[0][1] = 3; A[0][2] = 4; A[1][0] = 5; A[1][1] = 6; A[1][2] = 7; A[2][0] = 1; A[2][1] = 2; A[2][2] = 3; Matrix *M = new Matrix(A, 3, 3); delete[] A; delete M; Below the class definition.. class Matrix { private: int width; int height; int stride; float* elements; public: Matrix(float** a, int n, int m); ~Matrix(); }; Matrix::Matrix(float** a, int n, int m) { // n: num rows // m: elem per rows elements = new float[n*m]; for (int i=0; i<n; i++) { for (int j=0; j<m; j++) { elements[i*n + j] = a[n][m]; } } } Matrix::~Matrix() { delete[] elements; }

    Read the article

  • which is better in general, map or vector in c++?

    - by tsubasa
    As I know that accessing an element in vector takes constant time while in map takes logarithmic time. However, storing a map takes less memory than storing a vector. Therefore, I want to ask which one is better in general? I'm considering using one of those two in my program, which has about 1000 elements. I plan to use 3 dimensional vector, which would take 1000x1000x1000 elements.

    Read the article

  • Undo implementation - DOM manipulations

    - by sonofdelphi
    Is there a library that can be used for implementing undo/redo functionality for DOM element manipulations in JavaScript? I'm writing an app that moves around DOM elements, enables editing and deletion of those elements. There are event-handlers and other objects associated with each element operated upon. Not sure whether I need to roll my own implementation of the Command pattern for this. Surely, there must be something available? If not, suggestions and pointers would be a great help.

    Read the article

  • What's the formal name for this Syntax?

    - by rlb.usa
    Sometimes in Scheme, I have functions that take arguments like this add 3 4 What do you call this kind of "list" where it's elements are like a1 a2 a3 ? I don't think you can call it a list because lists are contained in parenthesis and elements are comma-seperated.

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to use JSF+Facelets with HTML 4/5?

    - by Bytecode Ninja
    Facelets relies on XML namespaces to work with XHTML. How are HTML 4, and as far as I know, HTML 5 do not support namespaces. Also HTML 5 has some new elements that are not available in XHTML. Even HTML 4 and XHTML have some differences regarding elements and attributes they support. The question is: Is it possible to render HTML 4/5 documents using Facelets? If so, how?

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to modify a few fields in an XML using Java

    - by Kailas J C
    I have a big XML which contains around 300 elements. I need to modify 2 or 3 elements in this xml using Java. I don't want to go for conventional marshalling and unmarshalling as it involves the parsing of the whole XML. How is XPath/XSLT manipulation? I know that I can easily read the data but i need to modify the same and put in back in the same XML. The primary concern here is performance. Kindly advise

    Read the article

  • Does F# have an equivalent to Haskell's take?

    - by McMuttons
    In Haskell, there is a function "take n list" which returns the first n elements from a list. For example "sum (take 3 xs)" sums up the first three elements in the list xs. Does F# have an equivalent? I expected it to be one of the List-functions, but I can't spot anything that seems to match.

    Read the article

  • With custom binding for Masonry how would I resize the container appropriately

    - by BigDubb
    Based on the suggestion give here, and the information given here on how to make a custom bindingHandler for a forEach, I decided to attempt to write my own custom binding for a forEach and Masonry. Because the elements are added on the fly the redrawing and moving around of elements to fill the space doesn't occur. So, this functionality needed to be moved after the elements have been rendered or called after each item has been added. Here is my bindingHandler ko.bindingHandlers.masonry = { init: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindingsAccessor) { var $element = $(element), originalContent = $element.html(); $element.data("original-content", originalContent); //var msnry = new Masonry($element); return { controlsDescendantBindings: true } }, update: function (element, valueAccessor, allBindingsAccessor) { var value = ko.utils.unwrapObservable(valueAccessor()), //get the list of items items = value.items(), //get a jQuery reference to the element $element = $(element), //get the current content of the element elementContent = $element.data("original-content"); $element.html(""); var container = $element[0]; var msnry = new Masonry(container); for (var index = 0; index < items.length; index++) { (function () { //get the list of items var item = ko.utils.unwrapObservable(items[index]), $childElement = $(elementContent); ko.applyBindings(item, $childElement[0]); //add the child to the parent $element.append($childElement); msnry.appended($childElement[0]); })(); msnry.layout(); msnry.bindResize(); } } }; and the HTML implementing the handler. <div id="criteriaContainer" data-bind="masonry: { items: SearchItems.Items }"> <div class="searchCriterion control-group"> <label class="control-label" data-bind="text: Description"></label> <div class="controls"> <input type="hidden" data-bind="value: Value, select2: { minimumInputLength: 3, queryUri: SearchUri(), placeholder: Placeholder(), allowClear: true }" style="width: 450px"> </div> <p data-bind="text: Value"></p> </div> </div> When this shows up on the page It stacks all if the elements rendered via the append method right on top of each other. You can see in my bindingHandler I am calling bindResize as well as layout(), neither of which seem to be having any effect. Here's a screenshot of what it looks like in the UI.

    Read the article

  • Is there a sorted_vector class, which supports insert() etc.?

    - by Frank
    Often, it is more efficient to use a sorted std::vector instead of a std::set. Does anyone know a library class sorted_vector, which basically has a similar interface to std::set, but inserts elements into the sorted vector (so that there are no duplicates), uses binary search to find elements, etc.? I know it's not hard to write, but probably better not to waste time and use an existing implementation anyway.

    Read the article

  • reading from file

    - by lego69
    can somebody help me, how can I filter my file, inside the file I have rows with 3, 4, 5 elements, I want print using echo only these which have 5 elements, thanks in advance (I'm talkin about scripts)

    Read the article

  • Which CMS to use?

    - by Hastings
    I need to create a web (or non-web) system where a user can create a template layout with tags and placeholders for elements. They could then add new pages to this template. My system would need to pick up any elements that have changed and create an XML of the tagged content. I was just wondering what would be the best CMS or any other software I could use to implement this?

    Read the article

  • Heuristic for sliding tile problem.

    - by MustDash
    The idea is to move all of the right elements into the left and the left into the right with an empty space in the middle. The elements can either jump over one or two pieces into an empty space. LLL[ ]RRR I'm trying to think of a heuristic for this task. Is the heuristic meant to aid in finding a possible solution, or actually return a number of moves as the solution? How would I express such a heuristic?

    Read the article

  • Animate css attributes: set "bottom" and remove "top"

    - by Slevin
    I'm working on a few animations with jQuery. I have 3-4 elements which should slide in from the top. I defined their positions with css: #element-1 { top:124px; left:0px; right:auto; bottom:auto; } #element-2 { top:230px; left:670px; right:auto; bottom:auto; } #element-3 { top:auto; left:0px; right:auto; bottom:100px; } Then I save their positions initial on pageload, cause i have to manipulate the css value to top: -1000px to hide them and make the "slide in from top" animation possible. var image_margins = []; $('img').each(function() { var obj = $(this), id = obj.attr('id'), mtop = obj.css('top'), mleft = obj.css('left'), mright = obj.css('right'), mbottom = obj.css('bottom'); // save alle margins in array image_margins[id] = {mtop:mtop,mleft:mleft,mright:mright,mbottom:mbottom}; // hide all content elements obj.css({'top':'-1000px'}); }); When the user clicks the animate button, the elements should slide to their saved positions. The problem: i can't remove the top attribute. Some elements only have bottom margins. I tried to set top to auto or '', but it's always 0px in DOM inspector. And bottom don't work if top is set. How can i get rid of the top attribute? $('.button').click(function(){ $('img').each(function() { var image = $(this), id = image.attr('id'), timeout = 0; setTimeout(function() { var mtop, mleft, mright, mbottom; if (image_margins[id].mtop != 'auto') { mtop = image_margins[id].mtop; } else { mtop = ''; } if (image_margins[id].mleft != 'auto') { mleft = image_margins[id].mleft; } else { mleft = ''; } if (image_margins[id].mright != 'auto') { mright = image_margins[id].mright; } else { mright = ''; } if (image_margins[id].mbottom != 'auto') { mbottom = image_margins[id].mbottom; } else { mbottom = ''; } image.animate({'top':mtop,'left':mleft,'right':mright,'bottom':mbottom},500); },timeout); timeout = timeout + 200; }); });

    Read the article

  • is there a way to condense a vector (C++)?

    - by zebraman
    I have a sparsely populated vector that I populated via hashing, so elements are scattered randomly in the vector. Now what I want to do is iterate over every element in that vector. What I had in mind was essentially condensing the vector to fit the number of elements present, removing any empty spaces. Is there a way I can do this?

    Read the article

  • For loops in Matlab

    - by seidel
    I run through a for loop, each time extracting certain elements of an array, say element1, element2, etc. How do I then pool all of the elements I've extracted together so that I have a list of them?

    Read the article

  • CSS: is there any way to have the same relative positioning even if the previous element have differ

    - by Patrick
    hi, I have a sequence of couples of elements. (.div1, .div2) I'm using position:relative attribute on .div2 to move it a bit on top and right with respect to div1. However .div1 elements have different content and heights, so the relative positioning of .div2 is not consistent (they sometimes are too high, sometimes too low). .div2 { position:relative; left:200px; top:-300; } thanks

    Read the article

  • prefill a std::vector at initialization?

    - by user146780
    I want to create a vector of vector of a vector of double and want it to already have (32,32,16) elements, without manually pushing all of these back. Is there a way to do it during initialization? (I dont care what value gets pushed) Thanks I want a 3 dimensional array, first dimension has 32, second dimension has 32 and third dimension has 16 elements

    Read the article

  • How to select data in JSON based on other JSON data? Javascript

    - by user1699030
    Is it possible to select certain data in a JSON Object using other data in the same JSON Object. Similar to MySQL. For example: myObj = {"elements" : [ { "name" : "Hydrogen", "symbol" : "H" }, { "name" : "Silver", "symbol" : "Ag" }]}; I want to select "Hydrogen" where the symbol is "H". Instead of having to put in something like this: document.getElementByID("TEST").innerHTML = myObj.elements[0].name; Thank you in advance.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85  | Next Page >