Search Results

Search found 9285 results on 372 pages for 'disk imaging'.

Page 79/372 | < Previous Page | 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86  | Next Page >

  • Why Are Minimized Programs Often Slow to Open Again?

    - by Jason Fitzpatrick
    It seems particularly counterintuitive: you minimize an application because you plan on returning to it later and wish to skip shutting the application down and restarting it later, but sometimes maximizing it takes even longer than launching it fresh. What gives? Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-driven grouping of Q&A web sites. The Question SuperUser reader Bart wants to know why he’s not saving any time with application minimization: I’m working in Photoshop CS6 and multiple browsers a lot. I’m not using them all at once, so sometimes some applications are minimized to taskbar for hours or days. The problem is, when I try to maximize them from the taskbar – it sometimes takes longer than starting them! Especially Photoshop feels really weird for many seconds after finally showing up, it’s slow, unresponsive and even sometimes totally freezes for minute or two. It’s not a hardware problem as it’s been like that since always on all on my PCs. Would I also notice it after upgrading my HDD to SDD and adding RAM (my main PC holds 4 GB currently)? Could guys with powerful pcs / macs tell me – does it also happen to you? I guess OSes somehow “focus” on active software and move all the resources away from the ones that run, but are not used. Is it possible to somehow set RAM / CPU / HDD priorities or something, for let’s say, Photoshop, so it won’t slow down after long period of inactivity? So what is the deal? Why does he find himself waiting to maximize a minimized app? The Answer SuperUser contributor Allquixotic explains why: Summary The immediate problem is that the programs that you have minimized are being paged out to the “page file” on your hard disk. This symptom can be improved by installing a Solid State Disk (SSD), adding more RAM to your system, reducing the number of programs you have open, or upgrading to a newer system architecture (for instance, Ivy Bridge or Haswell). Out of these options, adding more RAM is generally the most effective solution. Explanation The default behavior of Windows is to give active applications priority over inactive applications for having a spot in RAM. When there’s significant memory pressure (meaning the system doesn’t have a lot of free RAM if it were to let every program have all the RAM it wants), it starts putting minimized programs into the page file, which means it writes out their contents from RAM to disk, and then makes that area of RAM free. That free RAM helps programs you’re actively using — say, your web browser — run faster, because if they need to claim a new segment of RAM (like when you open a new tab), they can do so. This “free” RAM is also used as page cache, which means that when active programs attempt to read data on your hard disk, that data might be cached in RAM, which prevents your hard disk from being accessed to get that data. By using the majority of your RAM for page cache, and swapping out unused programs to disk, Windows is trying to improve responsiveness of the program(s) you are actively using, by making RAM available to them, and caching the files they access in RAM instead of the hard disk. The downside of this behavior is that minimized programs can take a while to have their contents copied from the page file, on disk, back into RAM. The time increases the larger the program’s footprint in memory. This is why you experience that delay when maximizing Photoshop. RAM is many times faster than a hard disk (depending on the specific hardware, it can be up to several orders of magnitude). An SSD is considerably faster than a hard disk, but it is still slower than RAM by orders of magnitude. Having your page file on an SSD will help, but it will also wear out the SSD more quickly than usual if your page file is heavily utilized due to RAM pressure. Remedies Here is an explanation of the available remedies, and their general effectiveness: Installing more RAM: This is the recommended path. If your system does not support more RAM than you already have installed, you will need to upgrade more of your system: possibly your motherboard, CPU, chassis, power supply, etc. depending on how old it is. If it’s a laptop, chances are you’ll have to buy an entire new laptop that supports more installed RAM. When you install more RAM, you reduce memory pressure, which reduces use of the page file, which is a good thing all around. You also make available more RAM for page cache, which will make all programs that access the hard disk run faster. As of Q4 2013, my personal recommendation is that you have at least 8 GB of RAM for a desktop or laptop whose purpose is anything more complex than web browsing and email. That means photo editing, video editing/viewing, playing computer games, audio editing or recording, programming / development, etc. all should have at least 8 GB of RAM, if not more. Run fewer programs at a time: This will only work if the programs you are running do not use a lot of memory on their own. Unfortunately, Adobe Creative Suite products such as Photoshop CS6 are known for using an enormous amount of memory. This also limits your multitasking ability. It’s a temporary, free remedy, but it can be an inconvenience to close down your web browser or Word every time you start Photoshop, for instance. This also wouldn’t stop Photoshop from being swapped when minimizing it, so it really isn’t a very effective solution. It only helps in some specific situations. Install an SSD: If your page file is on an SSD, the SSD’s improved speed compared to a hard disk will result in generally improved performance when the page file has to be read from or written to. Be aware that SSDs are not designed to withstand a very frequent and constant random stream of writes; they can only be written over a limited number of times before they start to break down. Heavy use of a page file is not a particularly good workload for an SSD. You should install an SSD in combination with a large amount of RAM if you want maximum performance while preserving the longevity of the SSD. Use a newer system architecture: Depending on the age of your system, you may be using an out of date system architecture. The “system architecture” is generally defined as the “generation” (think generations like children, parents, grandparents, etc.) of the motherboard and CPU. Newer generations generally support faster I/O (input/output), better memory bandwidth, lower latency, and less contention over shared resources, instead providing dedicated links between components. For example, starting with the “Nehalem” generation (around 2009), the Front-Side Bus (FSB) was eliminated, which removed a common bottleneck, because almost all system components had to share the same FSB for transmitting data. This was replaced with a “point to point” architecture, meaning that each component gets its own dedicated “lane” to the CPU, which continues to be improved every few years with new generations. You will generally see a more significant improvement in overall system performance depending on the “gap” between your computer’s architecture and the latest one available. For example, a Pentium 4 architecture from 2004 is going to see a much more significant improvement upgrading to “Haswell” (the latest as of Q4 2013) than a “Sandy Bridge” architecture from ~2010. Links Related questions: How to reduce disk thrashing (paging)? Windows Swap (Page File): Enable or Disable? Also, just in case you’re considering it, you really shouldn’t disable the page file, as this will only make matters worse; see here. And, in case you needed extra convincing to leave the Windows Page File alone, see here and here. Have something to add to the explanation? Sound off in the the comments. Want to read more answers from other tech-savvy Stack Exchange users? Check out the full discussion thread here.     

    Read the article

  • Is there a good way to convert between BitmapSource and Bitmap?

    - by JohannesH
    As far as I can tell the only way to convert from BitmapSource to Bitmap is through unsafe code... Like this (from Lesters WPF blog): myBitmapSource.CopyPixels(bits, stride, 0); unsafe { fixed (byte* pBits = bits) { IntPtr ptr = new IntPtr(pBits); System.Drawing.Bitmap bitmap = new System.Drawing.Bitmap( width, height, stride, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format32bppPArgb,ptr); return bitmap; } } To do the reverse: System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapSource bitmapSource = System.Windows.Interop.Imaging.CreateBitmapSourceFromHBitmap( bitmap.GetHbitmap(), IntPtr.Zero, Int32Rect.Empty, System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapSizeOptions.FromEmptyOptions()); Is there an easier way in the framework? And what is the reason it isn't in there (if it's not)? I would think it's fairly usable. The reason I need it is because I use AForge to do certain image operations in an WPF app. WPF wants to show BitmapSource/ImageSource but AForge works on Bitmaps.

    Read the article

  • Loading a image and copying the metadata of a jpeg image.

    - by Ravi shankar
    I am trying to load a jpeg image and trying to copy metadata to new image, but the new image is created with out any metadata. Can some one help me out in solving above problem. I am using C++ CLI 3.5. if (System::IO::Stream ^jpegStreamIn = File::Open(FileMyPictures, FileMode::Open, FileAccess::ReadWrite, FileShare::None)) { decoder = gcnew System::Windows::Media::Imaging::JpegBitmapDecoder(jpegStreamIn, System::Windows::Media::Imaging::BitmapCreateOptions::PreservePixelFormat, System::Windows::Media::Imaging::BitmapCacheOption::OnLoad); jpegStreamIn->Close(); } bitmapFrame = decoder->Frames[0]; metadata = (System::Windows::Media::Imaging::BitmapMetadata^)bitmapFrame->Metadata;

    Read the article

  • Why does this thumbnail generation code throw OutOfMemoryException on large files?

    - by tsilb
    This code works great for generating thumbnails, but when given a very large (100MB+) TIFF file, it throws OutOfMemoryExceptions. When I do it manually in Paint.NET on the same machine, it works fine. How can I improve this code to stop throwing on very large files? In this case I'm loading a 721MB TIF on a machine with 8GB RAM. The Task Manager shows 2GB used so something is preventing it from using all that memory. Specifically it throws when I load the Image to calculate the size of the original. What gives? /// <summary>Creates a thumbnail of a given image.</summary> /// <param name="inFile">Fully qualified path to file to create a thumbnail of</param> /// <param name="outFile">Fully qualified path to created thumbnail</param> /// <param name="x">Width of thumbnail</param> /// <returns>flag; result = is success</returns> public static bool CreateThumbnail(string inFile, string outFile, int x) { // Validation - assume 16x16 icon is smallest useful size. Smaller than that is just not going to do us any good anyway. I consider that an "Exceptional" case. if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(inFile)) throw new ArgumentNullException("inFile"); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(outFile)) throw new ArgumentNullException("outFile"); if (x < 16) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("x"); if (!File.Exists(inFile)) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("inFile", "File does not exist: " + inFile); // Mathematically determine Y dimension int y; using (Image img = Image.FromFile(inFile)) { // OutOfMemoryException double xyRatio = (double)x / (double)img.Width; y = (int)((double)img.Height * xyRatio); } // All this crap could have easily been Image.Save(filename, x, y)... but nooooo.... using (Bitmap bmp = new Bitmap(inFile)) using (Bitmap thumb = new Bitmap((Image)bmp, new Size(x, y))) using (Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(thumb)) { g.SmoothingMode = System.Drawing.Drawing2D.SmoothingMode.HighQuality; g.InterpolationMode = System.Drawing.Drawing2D.InterpolationMode.High; g.CompositingQuality = System.Drawing.Drawing2D.CompositingQuality.HighQuality; System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageCodecInfo codec = System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageCodecInfo.GetImageEncoders()[1]; System.Drawing.Imaging.EncoderParameters ep2 = new System.Drawing.Imaging.EncoderParameters(1); ep2.Param[0] = new System.Drawing.Imaging.EncoderParameter(System.Drawing.Imaging.Encoder.Quality, 100L); g.DrawImage(bmp, new Rectangle(0,0,thumb.Width, thumb.Height)); try { thumb.Save(outFile, codec, ep2); return true; } catch { return false; } } }

    Read the article

  • I need to write a program that reads angles in radians from an input disk and converts them in degre

    - by Amadou
    Write a program that reads angles in radians from an input disk le and converts them into degrees, minutes, and seconds. Output should be written into another le. A sample input le could be: # this is a comment # your program should be able to skip comment lines # and blank lines # input radian numbers could be seperated by blanks 0.0 1.0 # or by a newline 3.141593 6.0

    Read the article

  • Setting an XAML Window always on top (but no TopMost property)

    - by Brian Scherady
    I am developing an application based on OptiTrack SDK (from NaturalPoint). I need to run the application window as "Always on Top". The window is designed in XAML and is controled in the class "CameraView" but it does not seem to include a "TopMost" property or equivalent. Attached are the code of "CameraView.xaml.cs" and the code of "CameraView.xaml" that are part of OptiTrack SDK (NaturalPoint) called "Single_Camera_CSharp_.NET_3.0". One could expect the class CameraView to contain properties or members to set the position of the window on the screen or to set it to TopMost but as far as searched I found nothing. I wonder what I should do. Thank you, Brian ================ "CameraView.xaml.cs" using System; using System.IO; using System.Net; using System.Windows; using System.Windows.Controls; using System.Windows.Data; using System.Windows.Media; using System.Windows.Media.Animation; using System.Windows.Navigation; using System.Drawing.Imaging; using System.Drawing.Drawing2D; using System.Windows.Threading; namespace TestProject { public partial class CameraView { private const int NP_OPTION_OBJECT_COLOR_OPTION = 3; private const int NP_OPTION_VIDEO_TYPE = 48; private const int NP_OPTION_NUMERIC_DISPLAY_ON = 71; private const int NP_OPTION_NUMERIC_DISPLAY_OFF = 72; private const int NP_OPTION_FETCH_RLE = 73; private const int NP_OPTION_FETCH_GRAYSCALE = 74; private const int NP_OPTION_FRAME_DECIMATION = 52; private const int NP_OPTION_INTENSITY = 50; private const int NP_OPTION_SEND_EMPTY_FRAMES = 41; private const int NP_OPTION_THRESHOLD = 5; private const int NP_OPTION_EXPOSURE = 46; private const int NP_OPTION_SEND_FRAME_MASK = 73; private const int NP_OPTION_TEXT_OVERLAY_OPTION = 74; // public delegate void OnCameraViewCreate(CameraView camera); // public static OnCameraViewCreate onCameraViewCreate; private System.Drawing.Bitmap raw = new System.Drawing.Bitmap(353, 288, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format32bppArgb); private int mFrameCounter; private int mDisplayCounter; private DispatcherTimer timer1 = new DispatcherTimer(); private bool mVideoFrameAvailable = false; private int mNumeric = -1; private bool mGreyscale = false; private bool mOverlay = true; public CameraView() { this.InitializeComponent(); timer1.Interval = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 0, 10); timer1.Tick += new EventHandler(timer1_Tick); } public int Numeric { get { return mNumeric; } set { mNumeric = value % 100; if (mNumeric = 0) { if (Camera != null) Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_NUMERIC_DISPLAY_ON, value % 100); } } } private bool CameraRunning = false; private OptiTrack.NPCamera mCamera; public OptiTrack.NPCamera Camera { get { return mCamera; } set { if (mCamera == value) return; //== Don't do anything if you're assigning the same camera == if (mCamera != null) { //== Shut the selected camera down ==<< if (CameraRunning) { CameraRunning = false; mCamera.Stop(); mCamera.FrameAvailable -= FrameAvailable; } } mCamera = value; if (mCamera == null) { mNumeric = -1; } else { serialLabel.Content = "Camera "+mCamera.SerialNumber.ToString(); //mNumeric.ToString(); } } } private void FrameAvailable(OptiTrack.NPCamera Camera) { mFrameCounter++; try { OptiTrack.NPCameraFrame frame = Camera.GetFrame(0); int id = frame.Id; if (CameraRunning) { GetFrameData(Camera, frame); } frame.Free(); } catch (Exception) { int r = 0; r++; } } private void GetFrameData(OptiTrack.NPCamera camera, OptiTrack.NPCameraFrame frame) { BitmapData bmData = raw.LockBits(new System.Drawing.Rectangle(0, 0, raw.Width, raw.Height), ImageLockMode.ReadWrite, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format32bppArgb); int stride = bmData.Stride; System.IntPtr bufferPtr = bmData.Scan0; unsafe { byte* buffer = (byte*)(void*)bufferPtr; camera.GetFrameImage(frame, bmData.Width, bmData.Height, bmData.Stride, 32, ref buffer[0]); } raw.UnlockBits(bmData); mVideoFrameAvailable = true; } private void timer1_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (CameraRunning && mVideoFrameAvailable) { mVideoFrameAvailable = false; cameraImage.Source = Img(raw); mDisplayCounter++; } } private System.Windows.Media.ImageSource Img(System.Drawing.Bitmap img) { System.Drawing.Imaging.BitmapData bmData = img.LockBits(new System.Drawing.Rectangle(0, 0, img.Width, img.Height), System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.ReadWrite, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format32bppPArgb); System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapSource bitmap = System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapSource.Create( img.Width, img.Height, 96, 96, PixelFormats.Bgra32, System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapPalettes.WebPalette, bmData.Scan0, bmData.Stride * bmData.Height, bmData.Stride); img.UnlockBits(bmData); return bitmap; } private void startStopButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if (CameraRunning) StopCamera(); else StartCamera(); } public void StartCamera() { if (Camera != null) { mFrameCounter = 0; mDisplayCounter = 0; Camera.FrameAvailable += FrameAvailable; Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_VIDEO_TYPE, 0); Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_FRAME_DECIMATION, 1); Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_INTENSITY, 0); Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_EXPOSURE, 10); Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_THRESHOLD, 50); Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_OBJECT_COLOR_OPTION, 0); SetOverlayOption(); SetGreyscaleOption(); timer1.Start(); Camera.Start(); CameraRunning = true; this.Numeric = mNumeric; startStopButton.Content = "Stop Camera"; } } private void SetGreyscaleOption() { if(mGreyscale) Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_VIDEO_TYPE, 1); else Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_VIDEO_TYPE, 0); } private void SetOverlayOption() { if(mOverlay) Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_TEXT_OVERLAY_OPTION, 255); else Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_TEXT_OVERLAY_OPTION, 0); } public void StopCamera() { if (Camera != null) { Camera.Stop(); timer1.Stop(); CameraRunning = false; Camera.FrameAvailable -= FrameAvailable; Camera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_NUMERIC_DISPLAY_OFF, 0); startStopButton.Content = "Start Camera"; } } private void greyscaleButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if(mGreyscale) mGreyscale = false; else mGreyscale = true; SetGreyscaleOption(); } private void OverlayButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if(mOverlay) mOverlay = false; else mOverlay = true; SetOverlayOption(); } private void exposureSlider_ValueChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if (mCamera!=null) { mCamera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_EXPOSURE, (int) this.exposureSlider.Value); } } private void thresholdSlider_ValueChanged(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if (mCamera != null) { mCamera.SetOption(NP_OPTION_THRESHOLD, (int)this.thresholdSlider.Value); } } private void optionsButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if (!propertyPanel.IsVisible) propertyPanel.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; else propertyPanel.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; } } } ================ "CameraView.xaml"

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to gzip and upload this string to Amazon S3 without ever being written to disk?

    - by BigJoe714
    I know this is probably possible using Streams, but I wasn't sure the correct syntax. I would like to pass a string to the Save method and have it gzip the string and upload it to Amazon S3 without ever being written to disk. The current method inefficiently reads/writes to disk in between. The S3 PutObjectRequest has a constructor with InputStream input as an option. import java.io.*; import java.util.zip.GZIPOutputStream; import com.amazonaws.auth.PropertiesCredentials; import com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3; import com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client; import com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.PutObjectRequest; public class FileStore { public static void Save(String data) throws IOException { File file = File.createTempFile("filemaster-", ".htm"); file.deleteOnExit(); Writer writer = new OutputStreamWriter(new FileOutputStream(file)); writer.write(data); writer.flush(); writer.close(); String zippedFilename = gzipFile(file.getAbsolutePath()); File zippedFile = new File(zippedFilename); zippedFile.deleteOnExit(); AmazonS3 s3 = new AmazonS3Client(new PropertiesCredentials( new FileInputStream("AwsCredentials.properties"))); String bucketName = "mybucket"; String key = "test/" + zippedFile.getName(); s3.putObject(new PutObjectRequest(bucketName, key, zippedFile)); } public static String gzipFile(String filename) throws IOException { try { // Create the GZIP output stream String outFilename = filename + ".gz"; GZIPOutputStream out = new GZIPOutputStream(new FileOutputStream(outFilename)); // Open the input file FileInputStream in = new FileInputStream(filename); // Transfer bytes from the input file to the GZIP output stream byte[] buf = new byte[1024]; int len; while ((len = in.read(buf)) > 0) { out.write(buf, 0, len); } in.close(); // Complete the GZIP file out.finish(); out.close(); return outFilename; } catch (IOException e) { throw e; } } }

    Read the article

  • how to convert bitmap to intptr in C#

    - by carl
    code as fellow: Bitmap bmp = new Bitmap(e.width, e.height, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format24bppRgb); System.Drawing.Imaging.BitmapData data = bmp.LockBits(new Rectangle(0, 0, e.width, e.height), System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageLockMode.ReadWrite, System.Drawing.Imaging.PixelFormat.Format24bppRgb); int dataLength = e.width * e.height * 3; Win32.memcpy(data.Scan0, (IntPtr)e.data, (uint)dataLength); convertBitmapToIntptr(bmp);????? how to code in this function like convertBitmapToIntptr(bmp). who give me some idea. thank you very much.

    Read the article

  • Why do updates inside of a SQL transaction still need disk IO?

    - by usr
    In SQL Profiler you can see that very simple updates to a table by primary key take about 10-30ms each. On about every 10th update the write column shows 1, on all other updates it shows 0. This must mean that about every 10th update statement still requires disk IO. I wonder why that is. Would it not be more efficient queue up all IO until the transaction commits?

    Read the article

  • Is there any Disk Cache solution for ASP.NET?

    - by silent
    My client has a busy traffic site with a big amount of pages, ASP.NET's built-in cache solutions is good, but it only stores content into the memory. Since the site has a big amount of pages, so I think disk caching would be a better idea. But after searching I didn't find a solution, any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • iPhone: How can I store a high score to disk.

    - by Robert
    I have a int which is my high score: NSInterger highScore; I want to store it persistently to disk Do I have to convert it to a string, then write the string to a file, then parse it back when I want to read it. Or is there a better way to store small amounts of data?

    Read the article

  • Dedicated hard disk for SE dbname.dbs files & dedicated ramdisk for /tmp files.

    - by Frank Computer
    INFORMIX-SE 7.2: I would like to dedicate a hard disk, exclusively for my dbname.dbs directory which holds all the .dat and .idx files, and create a ramdisk for my /tmp temporary files in order to improve performance. I would also like to strip down the OS from any unecessary files and processes to minimize overhead for my dedicated application. Is this a good idea and are there any roadmaps for accomplishing this?

    Read the article

  • Can i get the particular disk space(like C: ) using Jav program..?

    - by Venkats
    I used SystemEnvironment class in java for getting system information. In that i can get only RAM size, i can't get the specific disk space like c: and D: code is, com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean mxbean = (com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean)ManagementFactory.getOperatingSystemMXBean(); System.out.println("Total RAM:"+mxbean.getTotalSwapSpaceSize()/(1024*1024*1024)+""+"GB"); Can i get this using in java program?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86  | Next Page >