Search Results

Search found 556 results on 23 pages for 'emmett gear'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 8/23 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • Flash vs Javascript

    - by metal-gear-solid
    I always heard approx 5% users in the world keep JavaScript turned off. But Adobe claims Flash content reaches 99% of Internet viewers http://www.adobe.com/products/player_census/flashplayer/ Is it true even iphone, ipad and blackberry doesn't support Flash? if it's true then if same thing we can achieve with FLASH and JavaScript , then should we go for flash?

    Read the article

  • Is W3C Valid XHTML and CSS Code, Semantic and Accessible Mark-up enough for site's SEO?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    I created a web-site for a client with W3C Valid XHTML and CSS Code, Semantic and Accessible Mark-up and I had said to client my code will be SEO friendly. Theyway i code it will be good for your site SEO. I putted my all efforts to make good code Now my non-techie Client is asking me, Should him go for any SEO company even after providing SEO friendly site by me? What other SEO companies will do for him other than what we can't by W3C Valid XHTML, CSS , Semantic and Accessible Mark-up?

    Read the article

  • Is it ok to use <strong> in place of <b> blindly ?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Note: I know <b> is presentational and <span style="font-weight:bold> is better way and <strong> and <em> for emphasis but my question is not regarding this. Should we convert every <b> to <strong> blindly ? many people do this they think <b> is not good as per web standards so they convert every <b> to <strong> upon site redesign, content re-population, new site design and people suggest this to others also. Dreamweaver has also given option to convert all <b> and <i> to <strong> and <em> on code paste in design view and when we use B and I Which people use blindly. And Dreamweaver(if above option is checked) and many online WYSIWYG editor give output in <strong> and <em> while button shows B and I. In my opinion it's creating misconception about <strong> and <b> When we get content from client we don't know where client want to give emphasize and where he just want to use text bold for presentation purpose.What we should do in this condition? no one has time client and we both to give time to think for each bold text, it should be in <b> or in <strong>, <i> or in <em> What are pros and cons to convert every <b> and <i> into <strong> and <em> blindly if we are saying our site is accessible? Update: remember <b> and <i> are not deprecated there are in HTML 5 specification

    Read the article

  • in pure css way with IE 6 supprt how to remove margin from last li?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    in this condition is it possible to not to apply margin-right to last li I need pure css way and support in IE6 and 7 also. is there any way to achieve this. ul li {display:inline;margin-right:10px} <ul id="nav"> <li><a href="#nowhere" >Lorem</a></li> <li><a href="#nowhere" >Aliquam</a></li> <li><a href="#nowhere" >Morbi</a></li> <li><a href="#nowhere" >Praesent</a></li> <li><a href="#nowhere" >Pellentesque</a></li> </ul>

    Read the article

  • How to convert this jquery code into noconflict

    - by metal-gear-solid
    will we have to replace every $ with jquery? $(document).ready(function() { $('.tabs a').click(function(){ switch_tabs($(this)); }); switch_tabs($('.defaulttab')); }); function switch_tabs(obj) { $('.tab-content').hide(); $('.tabs a').removeClass("selected"); var id = obj.attr("rel"); $('#'+id).show(); obj.addClass("selected"); }

    Read the article

  • Why this code showing error in W3C validator?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Why this code showing error in W3C validator "character data is not allowed here" <blockquote>all visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event -- in the living act, the undoubted deed -- there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its feature from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask. All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event -- in the living act, the undoubted deed -- there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its feature from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask.</blockquote> It does not giving any error in this validator http://www.onlinewebcheck.com/ and not in https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/249/

    Read the article

  • How to apply css locally on any online page?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    For testing I don't want to upload css to FTP on each change till site complete , but site and content is online. (i'm not talking about saving page locally then apply css) Can i just apply css locally to any online page. it would be easier to edit and see changes locally till css work end. and i want to see applied effect on FF and IE. How to do that? Is it possible.

    Read the article

  • What are cons if we use javascript to apply css selectors to that browser who do not support that pr

    - by metal-gear-solid
    What are cons if we use JavaScript to apply only CSS property/selectors to that browser who do not support that property by default? to keep my HTML semantic and keep free from Deprecated HTML. Is it against content, style and Behavior separation? If I make accessible site then should i only use whatever i can do with pure css. shouldn't use JavaScript to apply CSS properties. I know those css properties which I'm applying through javascript will not work if javascript is disabled. then due to this reason shouldn't use javascript to apply css never. I'm talking about using these type of stuffs http://www.fetchak.com/ie-css3/ http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/

    Read the article

  • Do you know best site on Net to learn XHTML 1.0 strict , Like other than W3schools.com but with bett

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Do you know best site on Net to learn XHTML , Like other than W3schools.com but with better and latest content? I have to link some friends who want to learn HTML? I like the "Try it editor" of W3C schools but not the content. I need semantic discussion also. what is the element all about and what is the semantic value, even if's it's valid, should we use or not. etc Is there any other site focused on Semantic , accessible and Valid XHTML with good content with "try it editor" like w3c schools? or now i should suggest to someone to learn HTML 5 Directly?

    Read the article

  • WordPress 2.9.2 VS WordPress 3.0 Release Candidate

    - by metal-gear-solid
    I'm going to do a new install of Wordpress. new 3.0 version is coming. current stable version is "WordPress 2.9.2" and "WordPress 3.0 Release Candidate" the last release before final version 3. So for now i should setup 2.9.2 or 3.0 Release Candidate? will i have to replace all files to RC upon final release? What are cons to use Release Candidate version?

    Read the article

  • What are pros and cons to add line-height to body { }?

    - by metal-gear-solid
    Is it good to add line-height in body{line-height:1.5} or it would be better if i add separately for tag by tag like p{ line height:1em} etc. Edit: body {line-height:in em} create problem with if we put image with float inside Edit: 24 April 2010: If i have to add different line heights to elements like p {line-height: 1.4} h1 {line-height:1.6} h2 {line-height:1.2} ul li {line-height:1.1} then shouldn't i use line height in body {line-height:1.4} if body {line-height:1.4} and h1 {line-height:1.6} then what would be line height for h1?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >