Search Results

Search found 33297 results on 1332 pages for 'java java ee'.

Page 829/1332 | < Previous Page | 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836  | Next Page >

  • Method Overloading for NULL parameter

    - by Phani
    I have added three methods with parameters: public static void doSomething(Object obj) { System.out.println("Object called"); } public static void doSomething(char[] obj) { System.out.println("Array called"); } public static void doSomething(Integer obj) { System.out.println("Array called"); } When I am calling doSomething(null) , then compiler throws error as ambiguous methods. So Is the issue because Integer and char[] methods or Integer and Object methods?

    Read the article

  • Sad logic on types

    - by user2972231
    Code base is littered with code like this: BaseRecord record = // some BaseRecord switch(record.source()) { case FOO: return process((FooRecord)record); case BAR: return process((BarRecord)record); case QUUX: return process((QuuxRecord)record); . . // ~25 more cases . } and then private SomeClass process(BarRecord record) { } private SomeClass process(FooRecord record) { } private SomeClass process(QuuxRecord record) { } It makes me terribly sad. Then, every time a new class is derived from BaseRecord, we have to chase all over our code base updating these case statements and adding new process methods. This kind of logic is repeated everywhere, I think too many to add a method for each and override in the classes. How can I improve this?

    Read the article

  • No Hibernate Exception on the same insert of data

    - by Mark Estrada
    Hi All, Hibernate Newbie here. I am quite unsure why I am not getting any exception when I am executing below code. On first attempt, this code creates the Book Entry on my Book Table. But my concern is that when I execute below code again, no error was pop out by Hibernate. I was in fact expecting some sort of Violation of Primary Key Constraints as what I have bee doing in JDBC code. public class BookDao { public void createBook(Book bookObj) { Session session = HibernateUtil.getSessionFactory() .getCurrentSession(); session.beginTransaction(); session.saveOrUpdate(bookObj); session.getTransaction().commit(); } } public class HibernateUtil { private static final SessionFactory sessionFactory = buildSessionFactory(); private static SessionFactory buildSessionFactory() { try { // Create the SessionFactory from hibernate.cfg.xml return new AnnotationConfiguration().configure() .buildSessionFactory(); } catch (Throwable ex) { // Make sure you log the exception, as it might be swallowed ex.printStackTrace(); throw new ExceptionInInitializerError(ex); } } public static SessionFactory getSessionFactory() { return sessionFactory; } } public class BookDBStarter { public static void main(String[] args) { Book bookHF = new Book(); bookHF.setIsbn("HF-12345"); bookHF.setName("Head First HTML"); bookHF.setPublishDate(new Date()); BookDao daoBook = new BookDao(); daoBook.createBook(bookHF); } } Is this normal hibernate way? And how will I know if my insert is successful? Any thoughts?

    Read the article

  • Is there any danger in committing to a component library such as SmartGwt or Swing?

    - by Banang
    Since February this year I have been working on an app that's built using SmartGWT components. Generally, I find the components very nice to work with, and the fact that they're open source and free to use is just fantastic. However, I can't seem to shake the feeling that it's not a durable way of developing, but I can't quite explain why. Maybe it's because I know that any minute now the team developing it could decide to stop, which would leave me and my team in a bit of a pickle, but I'm sure there must be something more. I have been trying to find ways of explaining this feeling to myself, but to no avail. Therefore I turn to you, dear community, to ask if you can come up with a good reason why committing to building your app (that's supposed to be around for many more years to come) using a component library such as SmartGWT is a bad idea? Is there any reason I should just have developed the components myself? Or did I make the right choice when deciding not to reinvent the wheel and just go for what was readily available?

    Read the article

  • Why are static imports of static methods with same names legal?

    - by user1055638
    Lets say we have these packages and classes: package p1; public class A1 { public static void a() {} } package p2; public class A1 { public static void a() {} } package p3; import static p1.A1.a; import static p2.A1.a; public class A1 { public static void test() { } } I am wondering, why the static import of methods is legal (won't result in compile time error) in package p3? We won't be able to use them further in the test() method as such usage will result in the compile time error. Why it is not the same as with a normal import of classes. Lets say we would like to import classes A1 from packages p1 and p2 into p3: package p3; import p1.A1; import p2.A1; such import is illegal and will result in the compile time error.

    Read the article

  • Make XStream ignore one specific private variable

    - by Tigraine
    Hi guys, I have a little problem with a class I am currently writing a save function for. I'm using XStream (com.thoughtworks.xstream) to serialize a class to XML using the DOMDriver. The class looks like this: public class World { private Configuration config; public World(Configuration config) { this.config = config; } } So, the issue here is that I do not want to serialize Configuration when serializing world, rather I'd like to give XStream a preconstructed Configuration instance when calling fromXml(). Problem here is mainly class design, Configuration holds a private reference to the GUI classes and therefore serializing Configuration means serializing the whole application completely with GUI etc.. And that's kind of bad. Is there a way to instruct XStream to not serialize the private field config, and upon load supply XStream with a configuration instance to use? greetings Daniel

    Read the article

  • Encrypt string with public key only

    - by vlahovic
    i'm currently working on a android project where i need to encrypt a string using 128 bit AES, padding PKCS7 and CBC. I don't want to use any salt for this. I've tried loads of different variations including PBEKey but i can't come up with working code. This is what i currently have: String plainText = "24124124123"; String pwd = "BobsPublicPassword"; byte[] key = pwd.getBytes(); key = cutArray(key, 16); byte[] input = plainText.getBytes(); byte[] output = null; SecretKeySpec keySpec = null; keySpec = new SecretKeySpec(key, "AES"); Cipher cipher = Cipher.getInstance("AES/CBC/PKCS7Padding"); cipher.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, keySpec); output = cipher.doFinal(input); private static byte[] cutArray(byte[] arr, int length){ byte[] resultArr = new byte[length]; for(int i = 0; i < length; i++ ){ resultArr[i] = arr[i]; } return resultArr; } Any help appreciated //Vlahovic

    Read the article

  • gae xmpp outbound service

    - by cometta
    currently i create xmppservlet like below public void doPost(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) throws IOException { JID jid = new JID("[email protected]"); Message msg = new MessageBuilder() .withRecipientJids(jid) .withBody("hi Hello i'm a fancy GAE app, how are you?") .build(); XMPPService xmpp = XMPPServiceFactory.getXMPPService(); SendResponse status = xmpp.sendMessage(msg); } by doing this, from [email protected], i need to send a message to [email protected] only, will [email protected] send out the message back to [email protected]. Is there anyway to programatically send out xmpp message without having [email protected] to initial chat window with [email protected] and send the first message? This should be consider outbound-service right? how to do this?

    Read the article

  • Indexing and Searching Over Word Level Annotation Layers in Lucene

    - by dmcer
    I have a data set with multiple layers of annotation over the underlying text, such as part-of-tags, chunks from a shallow parser, name entities, and others from various natural language processing (NLP) tools. For a sentence like The man went to the store, the annotations might look like: Word POS Chunk NER ==== === ===== ======== The DT NP Person man NN NP Person went VBD VP - to TO PP - the DT NP Location store NN NP Location I'd like to index a bunch of documents with annotations like these using Lucene and then perform searches across the different layers. An example of a simple query would be to retrieve all documents where Washington is tagged as a person. While I'm not absolutely committed to the notation, syntactically end-users might enter the query as follows: Query: Word=Washington,NER=Person I'd also like to do more complex queries involving the sequential order of annotations across different layers, e.g. find all the documents where there's a word tagged person followed by the words arrived at followed by a word tagged location. Such a query might look like: Query: "NER=Person Word=arrived Word=at NER=Location" What's a good way to go about approaching this with Lucene? Is there anyway to index and search over document fields that contain structured tokens?

    Read the article

  • XML parse file from HTTP

    - by Travis
    I have an XML file located at a location such as http://example.com/test.xml I'm trying to parse the XML file to use it in my program with xPath like this but it is not working. Document doc = builder.parse(new File(url)); How can I get the XML file?

    Read the article

  • Eclipse gives me a weird error when compiling...

    - by Legend
    I have this function which returns a datatype InetAddress[] public InetAddress [] lookupAllHostAddr(String host) throws UnknownHostException { Name name = null; try { name = new Name(host); } catch (TextParseException e) { throw new UnknownHostException(host); } Record [] records = null; if (preferV6) records = new Lookup(name, Type.AAAA).run(); if (records == null) records = new Lookup(name, Type.A).run(); if (records == null && !preferV6) records = new Lookup(name, Type.AAAA).run(); if (records == null) throw new UnknownHostException(host); InetAddress[] array = new InetAddress[records.length]; for (int i = 0; i < records.length; i++) { Record record = records[i]; if (records[i] instanceof ARecord) { ARecord a = (ARecord) records[i]; array[i] = a.getAddress(); } else { AAAARecord aaaa = (AAAARecord) records[i]; array[i] = aaaa.getAddress(); } } return array; } Eclipse complains that the return type should be byte[][] but when I change the return type to byte[][], it complains that the function is returning the wrong data type. I'm stuck in a loop. Does anyone know what is happening here?

    Read the article

  • How to make "Open File..." window in netbeans PLATFORM?

    - by joseph
    Hello, I need to create something like internal frame in netbeans platform, which loads file from any location. I tried it by jInternalFrame, but I was not able to find some container to which I can add my frame. I am working in netbeans platform, which has own pre-created main window. Pease help me by any advice, I am dealing with this about 10 hours, still without result.

    Read the article

  • How to copy generically superclass instances to subclass instances?

    - by gerry
    Hi @all, I have a class hierarchy / inheritance like this: public class A { private String name; // with getters & setters public void doAWithName(){ ... } } public class B extends A { public void doBWithName(){ // a differnt implementation to what I do in class A } } public class C extends B { public void doCWithName(){ // a differnt implementation to what I do in class A and B } } So at one time there is a instance of class A with the initialized field "name". Later I want this instance of A get wrapped into instance of B or C. So the superclasses should be get wrapped with a subclass! How can I make this most efficent with respect to DRY? I've thought about a constructor that does some copying with the getters/setters. But in this case I have to repeat myself - and this doesn't respect anymore to my initial requirement of DRY! So, how can I warp A to B by just initializing B's new fields (with default values) and delegating the rest to a method in A (which knows more than B about which fields of A should be accessed...). In the same way: If A should be wrapped into C only a method in c should init C's 'new' fields, delegate to B's wrap method (which therefore inits B's 'new' fields in C) and at last B delegates to A which copies it's fields to the fields of C). So in the end I have a new instance of C which has the values of A wrapped (and some default init values to the fields which the inheritance hierarchy has added).

    Read the article

  • Many returned records cause stackoverflow with Hibernate

    - by mimi law
    If there are many return records from DB. It will get stackoverflow problem. User is a class, which has a one to many relationship (to 3 other classes). When I print out the SQL, i found that the system runs the same query many time to get the data from DB. Does anyone know what the problem is? result.addAll(getCurrentSession().createCriteria(User.class) .add(Restrictions.ilike("name", "tom", MatchMode.ANYWHERE)) .setResultTransformer(Criteria.DISTINCT_ROOT_ENTITY) .list());

    Read the article

  • vlcj not displaying the video

    - by Cássio Eudardo
    I'm using vlcj to play video, but the video doesn't display on some computers(i tested in 4 and worked on 2, all windows), on 1 it displays the button but not the video and on the other it just display a gray background without the button. I tested .wmv and .avi files. I'm using the following code: public class Video extends JFrame implements WindowListener{ private JPanel contentPane; private JButton btnClose; private Dimension size; private float aspectRatio; private EmbeddedMediaPlayer mediaPlayer; public Video() { try { size = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getScreenSize(); aspectRatio = (float)size.width/size.height; String file = "..."; btnClose = new JButton("X"); btnClose.addActionListener(new ActionListener() {...}); btnClose.setBounds(640 - 50, 10, 40, 40); setBounds(size.width/2 - 320, (int)(size.height - 40*aspectRatio) - 250, 640, 200); contentPane = new JPanel(); contentPane.setLayout(null); setContentPane(contentPane); WindowsCanvas surface = new WindowsCanvas(); contentPane.setBounds(0, 0, 640, 200); surface.setBounds(0, 0, 640, 200); MediaPlayerFactory factory = new MediaPlayerFactory(new String("--no-video-title-show")); mediaPlayer = factory.newEmbeddedMediaPlayer(); surface.addMouseListener(new MouseListener() {...}); contentPane.add(btnClose); contentPane.add(surface); setVisible(true); mediaPlayer.setVideoSurface(factory.newVideoSurface(surface)); mediaPlayer.setRepeat(true); mediaPlayer.playMedia(file); } catch(Exception e) { } }}

    Read the article

  • Custom annotations to configure tests

    - by ace
    First of al let me start off by saying I think custom annotations can be used for this but i'm not totally sure. I would like to have a set of annotations that I can decorate some test classes with. The annotations would allow me to configure the test for different environments. Example: public class Atest extends BaseTest{ private String env; @Login(environment=env) public void testLogin(){ //do something } @SignUp(environment=env) public void testSignUp(){ //do something } } The idea here would be that the login annotation would then be used to lookup the username and password to be used in the testLogin method for testing a login process for a particular environment. So my question(s) is this possible to do with annotations? If so I have not been able to find a decent howto online to do something like this. Everything out there seems to be your basic here's how to do your custom annotations and a basic processor but I haven't found anything for a situation like this. Ideas?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836  | Next Page >