Search Results

Search found 6036 results on 242 pages for 'boost bind'.

Page 83/242 | < Previous Page | 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90  | Next Page >

  • Where do I define dependency properties shared by the detail views in a master-detail MVVM WPF scena

    - by absence
    I can think of two ways to implement dependency properties that are shared between the detail views: Store them in the master view model and add data bindings to the detail view models when they are created, and bind to them in the detail view. Don't store them in the view models at all, and use FindAncestor to bind directly to properties of the master view instead. What are the pros and cons of each, and are there other/better options?

    Read the article

  • Binding to a collection of DependencyObjects in Silverlight 4

    - by Meik
    As of Silverlight 4 it is possible to data bind against a DependencyObject (instead of a Framework element in previous versions). So far so good, but how do I bind agains a collection of DependencyObjects. The DataContext is not passed from the ObservableCollection to the collection elements, so that the DependencyProperties of the DependencyObjects are never called (neither the changed events). Neither the DependencyObject offers SetBinding or DataContext to initialize the binding manually. Thanks for any advice here.

    Read the article

  • Binding Programatically Generated Datasets To Report Viewer

    - by mavera
    Today I researched about reportviewer to use it in my project. As I see the samples and tutorials in the web, We should create an dataset file to Solution Explorer and bind it to report viewer to show data. However I want to create dataset programatically like sample code below. And I want to bind it. Dim ds As New DataSet DB_Gateway.myDataSet("select * from users", ds, "users") How can I do it?

    Read the article

  • something like INotifyCollectionChanged fires on xml file changed

    - by netmajor
    It's possible to implement INotifyCollectionChanged or other interface like IObservable to enable to bind filtered data from xml file on this file changed ? I see examples with properties or collection, but what with files changes ? I have that code to filter and bind xml data to list box: XmlDocument channelsDoc = new XmlDocument(); channelsDoc.Load("RssChannels.xml"); XmlNodeList channelsList = channelsDoc.GetElementsByTagName("channel"); this.RssChannelsListBox.DataContext = channelsList;

    Read the article

  • dropdownlist itemsource and selected value in wpf

    - by vahid
    hi all i have a dropdownlist that bind to a collection of all system colors(ObjectDataProvider).it shows colors name and background of each items is draw with colorName.it works fine . but know i have a listbox that bind to an collection(CollectionViewSource) that shows a list of element with a property name "backcolor" ,i want to selectedvalue of dropdown changed when selecteditem in listBox changed ???? my paltform is WPF and i know a few about masterDetails senario

    Read the article

  • How can I use functools.partial on multiple methods on an object, and freeze parameters out of order

    - by Joseph Garvin
    I find functools.partial to be extremely useful, but I would like to be able to freeze arguments out of order (the argument you want to freeze is not always the first one) and I'd like to be able to apply it to several methods on a class at once, to make a proxy object that has the same methods as the underlying object except with some of its methods parameter being frozen (think of it as generalizing partial to apply to classes). I've managed to scrap together a version of functools.partial called 'bind' that lets me specify parameters out of order by passing them by keyword argument. That part works: >>> def foo(x, y): ... print x, y ... >>> bar = bind(foo, y=3) >>> bar(2) 2 3 But my proxy class does not work, and I'm not sure why: >>> class Foo(object): ... def bar(self, x, y): ... print x, y ... >>> a = Foo() >>> b = PureProxy(a, bar=bind(Foo.bar, y=3)) >>> b.bar(2) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: bar() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) I'm probably doing this all sorts of wrong because I'm just going by what I've pieced together from random documentation, blogs, and running dir() on all the pieces. Suggestions both on how to make this work and better ways to implement it would be appreciated ;) One detail I'm unsure about is how this should all interact with descriptors. Code follows. from types import MethodType class PureProxy(object): def __init__(self, underlying, **substitutions): self.underlying = underlying for name in substitutions: subst_attr = substitutions[name] if hasattr(subst_attr, "underlying"): setattr(self, name, MethodType(subst_attr, self, PureProxy)) def __getattribute__(self, name): return getattr(object.__getattribute__(self, "underlying"), name) def bind(f, *args, **kwargs): """ Lets you freeze arguments of a function be certain values. Unlike functools.partial, you can freeze arguments by name, which has the bonus of letting you freeze them out of order. args will be treated just like partial, but kwargs will properly take into account if you are specifying a regular argument by name. """ argspec = inspect.getargspec(f) argdict = copy(kwargs) if hasattr(f, "im_func"): f = f.im_func args_idx = 0 for arg in argspec.args: if args_idx >= len(args): break argdict[arg] = args[args_idx] args_idx += 1 num_plugged = args_idx def new_func(*inner_args, **inner_kwargs): args_idx = 0 for arg in argspec.args[num_plugged:]: if arg in argdict: continue if args_idx >= len(inner_args): # We can't raise an error here because some remaining arguments # may have been passed in by keyword. break argdict[arg] = inner_args[args_idx] args_idx += 1 f(**dict(argdict, **inner_kwargs)) new_func.underlying = f return new_func

    Read the article

  • Binding to filtered version of collection

    - by Shane Fulmer
    I have a collection that contains all the items that I want to keep track of. I want to display 3 different grids, and in each one I want to display a different filtered version of the items. Is there a way to bind to a filtered version of the main collection without having to maintain 3 separate collections to bind to?

    Read the article

  • How to do binding inside htmltext CDATA

    - by Hichem
    I couldn't find a way to bind a variable inside the htmlText property of a Text component i want to be able to do something like this : <mx:Text id="bodyText" styleName="bodyText"> <mx:htmlText > <![CDATA[<img src='assets.OrangeRect' align='left' hspace='0' vspace='4'/> Bonjour {UserData.name} ]]> </mx:htmlText> </mx:Text> i want to bind UserData.name

    Read the article

  • jQuery UI not binding on popup windows

    - by Seth Duncan
    I get my datepicker control to bind fine to anything with a class of calendarTrigger on any of my pages, however on Popups (Of which use a Master Page and have the script files on it's master page) they don't bind to trigger datepicker UI elements. Is there something I am missing ?

    Read the article

  • Binding Combobox SelectedItem by a field's value

    - by Navid Farhadi
    Combobox bind to a set of Provinces, Village object has ProvinceID field and i want to bind SelectedItem of Combobox to a Province with Village's ProvinceID. My code is: <ComboBox ItemsSource="{Binding ProvincesList}" DisplayMemberPath="ProvinceName" SelectedValuePath="ProvinceID" SelectedValue="{Binding Village.ProvinceID}" /> But SelectedItem is anything.

    Read the article

  • Dependency injection: Scoping by region (Guice, Spring, Whatever)

    - by Itay
    Here's a simplified version of my needs. I have a program where every B object has its own C and D object, injected through Guice. In addition an A object is injected into every C and D objects. What I want: that for each B object, its C and D objects will be injected with the same A object. Specifically, I want the output of the program (below) to be: Created C0 with [A0] Created D0 with [A0] Created B0 with [C0, D0] Created C1 with [A1] Created D1 with [A1] Created B1 with [C1, D1] Where it currently produces the following output: Created C0 with [A0] Created D0 with [A1] <-- Should be A0 Created B0 with [C0, D0] Created C1 with [A2] <-- Should be A1 Created D1 with [A3] <-- Should be A1 Created B1 with [C1, D1] I am expecting DI containers to allow this kind of customization but so far I had no luck in finding a solution. Below is my Guice-based code, but a Spring-based (or other DI containers-based) solution is welcome. import java.util.Arrays; import com.google.inject.*; public class Main { public static class Super { private static Map<Class<?>,Integer> map = new HashMap<Class<?>,Integer>(); private Integer value; public Super(Object... args) { value = map.get(getClass()); value = value == null ? 0 : ++value; map.put(getClass(), value); if(args.length > 0) System.out.println("Created " + this + " with " + Arrays.toString(args)); } @Override public final String toString() { return "" + getClass().getSimpleName().charAt(0) + value; } } public interface A { } public static class AImpl extends Super implements A { } public interface B { } public static class BImpl extends Super implements B { @Inject public BImpl(C c, D d) { super(c,d); } } public interface C { } public static class CImpl extends Super implements C { @Inject public CImpl(A a) { super(a); } } public interface D { } public static class DImpl extends Super implements D { @Inject public DImpl(A a) { super(a); } } public static class MyModule extends AbstractModule { @Override protected void configure() { bind(A.class).to(AImpl.class); bind(B.class).to(BImpl.class); bind(C.class).to(CImpl.class); bind(D.class).to(DImpl.class); } } public static void main(String[] args) { Injector inj = Guice.createInjector(new MyModule()); inj.getInstance(B.class); inj.getInstance(B.class); } }

    Read the article

  • MVVM Binding Orthogonal Aspects in Views e.g. Application Settings

    - by chibacity
    I have an application which I am developing using WPF\Prism\MVVM. All is going well and I have some pleasing MVVM implementations. However, in some of my views I would like to be able to bind application settings e.g. when a user reloads an application, the checkbox for auto-scrolling a grid should be checked in the state it was last time the user used the application. My view needs to bind to something that holds the "auto-scroll" setting state. I could put this on the view-model, but applications settings are orthogonal to the purpose of the view-model. The "auto-scroll" setting is controlling an aspect of the view. This setting is just an example. There will be quite a number of them and splattering my view-models with properties to represent application settings (so I can bind them) feels decidedly yucky. One view-model per view seems to be de rigeuer... What is best\usual practice here? Splatter my view-models with application settings? Have multiple view-models per view so settings can be represented in their own right? Split views so that controls can bind to an ApplicationSettingsViewModel? = too many views? Something else? Edit 1 To add a little more context, I am developing a UI with a tabbed interface. Each tab will host a single widget and there a variety of widgets. Each widget is a Prism composition of individual views. Some views are common amongst widgets e.g. a file picker view. Whilst each widget is composed of several views, as a whole, conceptually a widget has a single set of user settings e.g. last file selected, auto-scroll enabled, etc. These need to be persisted and retrieved\applied when the application starts again, and the widget views are created. My question is focused on the fact that conceptually a widget has a single set of user settings which is at right-angles to the fact that a widget consists of many views. Each view in the widget has it's own view-model (which works nicely and logically) but if I stick to a one view-model per view, I would have to splatter each view-model with user settings appropriate to it. This doesn't sound right ?!?

    Read the article

  • wcf - jquery - gridview (webform) binding

    - by Abu Hamzah
    i am using WCF to return my data and not sure how sure how i will bind the gridview once i get the data on the clientside? any help? ContactServiceProxy.invoke({ serviceMethod: "Holidays", callback: function(response) { //how to bind gridview here? }, error: function(xhr, errorMsg, thrown) { postErrorAndUnBlockUI(xhr, errorMsg, thrown); } });

    Read the article

  • Why we need to read() before write() in TCP server program?

    - by Naga
    Hi, As per my understanding a simple TCP server will be coded as follows. socket() - bind() - listen() - accept() - read() - write() The clients will be written as follows. socket() - bind()(Optional) - connect() - write() - read() Please note the order difference in read() and write() calls between client and server program. Is it a requirement to always read() before write() in a server program and if, then why? Thanks, Naga

    Read the article

  • SortDescription with custom attached property

    - by Krimson
    Hi, In Xaml I can set a custom attached property using local:TestClass.TestProperty="1" An I can bind to a custom attached property using {Binding Path=(Namespace:[OwnerType].[PropertyName])} {Binding Path=(local:TestClass.TestProperty)} But how do I specify the namespace when I need to use a custom attached property in a SortDescription? I can bind to an attached property using new SortDescription("(Grid.Row)", ListSortDirection.Descending) but here I can't set a namespace anywhere... Best Regards, Jesper

    Read the article

  • Binding to two values

    - by developer
    Hi All, Is it possible to bind a label content to two values. For eg, I want a single label whose content is displayed as below, UserName= Firstname, Lastname where Firstname and Lastname, both are values from database. If I would be using to labels I would bind as Content={Binding Firstname} for one and Content={Binding Lastname} for another. But I want a single label to display both. Is it possible?

    Read the article

  • JavaFX - question regarding binding button's disabled state

    - by jamiebarrow
    I'm trying to create a dummy application that maintains a list of tasks. For now, all I'm trying to do is add to the list. I enter a task name in a text box, click on the add task button, and expect the list to be updated with the new item and the task name input to be cleared. I only want to be able to add tasks if the task name is not empty. The below code is my implementation, but I have a question regarding the binding. I'm binding the textbox's text variable to a string in my view model, and the button's disable variable to a boolean in my view model. I have a trigger to update the disabled state when the task name changes. When the binding of the task name happens the boolean is updated accordingly, but the button still appears disabled. But then when I mouse over the button, it becomes enabled. I believe this is due to JavaFX 1.3's binding being lazy - only updates the bound variable when it is read. Also, when I've added the task, I clear the task name in the model, but the textbox's text doesn't change - even though I'm using bind with inverse. Is there a way to make the textbox's text and the button's disabled state update automatically via the binding as I was expecting? Thanks, James AddTaskViewModel.fx: package jamiebarrow; import java.lang.System; public class AddTaskViewModel { function logChange(prop:String,oldValue,newValue):Void { println("{System.currentTimeMillis()} : {prop} [{oldValue}] to [{newValue}] "); } public var newTaskName: String on replace old { logChange("newTaskName",old,newTaskName); isAddTaskDisabled = (newTaskName == null or newTaskName.trim().length() == 0); }; public var isAddTaskDisabled: Boolean on replace old { logChange("isAddTaskDisabled",old,isAddTaskDisabled); }; public var taskItems = [] on replace old { logChange("taskItems",old,taskItems); }; public function addTask() { insert newTaskName into taskItems; newTaskName = ""; } } Main.fx: package jamiebarrow; import javafx.scene.control.Button; import javafx.scene.control.TextBox; import javafx.scene.control.ListView; import javafx.scene.Scene; import javafx.scene.layout.VBox; import javafx.stage.Stage; import javafx.scene.layout.HBox; def viewModel = AddTaskViewModel{}; var txtName: TextBox = TextBox { text: bind viewModel.newTaskName with inverse onKeyTyped: onKeyTyped }; function onKeyTyped(event): Void { txtName.commit(); // ensures model is updated cmdAddTask.disable = viewModel.isAddTaskDisabled;// the binding only occurs lazily, so this is needed } var cmdAddTask = Button { text: "Add" disable: bind viewModel.isAddTaskDisabled with inverse action: onAddTask }; function onAddTask(): Void { viewModel.addTask(); } var lstTasks = ListView { items: bind viewModel.taskItems with inverse }; Stage { scene: Scene { content: [ VBox { content: [ HBox { content: [ txtName, cmdAddTask ] }, lstTasks ] } ] } }

    Read the article

  • WPF Binding Between Controls

    - by David Ward
    I have a control on a page that contains a listbox. I also have another control which is a detail view. Both of the controls have their own ViewModel which their child controls bind to. Image Outlook. It has a list of folders and when you select a folder the detail control displays the contents of the folder. How can I bind the detail control to the selected item in the list control?

    Read the article

  • plupload not working in wordpress theme files

    - by Kedar B
    This is my code for image upload.... <a id="aaiu-uploader" class="aaiu_button" href="#"><?php _e('*Select Images (mandatory)','wpestate');?></a> <input type="hidden" name="attachid" id="attachid" value="<?php echo $attachid;?>"> <input type="hidden" name="attachthumb" id="attachthumb" value="<? php echo $thumbid;?>"> i want upload functionality more than one time in single page in wordpress.i have add js code for that same as first upload block but its not working. This is js code for image upload.... jQuery(document).ready(function($) { "use strict"; if (typeof(plupload) !== 'undefined') { var uploader = new plupload.Uploader(ajax_vars.plupload); uploader.init(); uploader.bind('FilesAdded', function (up, files) { $.each(files, function (i, file) { // console.log('append'+file.id ); $('#aaiu-upload-imagelist').append( '<div id="' + file.id + '">' + file.name + ' (' + plupload.formatSize(file.size) + ') <b></b>' + '</div>'); }); up.refresh(); // Reposition Flash/Silverlight uploader.start(); }); uploader.bind('UploadProgress', function (up, file) { $('#' + file.id + " b").html(file.percent + "%"); }); // On erro occur uploader.bind('Error', function (up, err) { $('#aaiu-upload-imagelist').append("<div>Error: " + err.code + ", Message: " + err.message + (err.file ? ", File: " + err.file.name : "") + "</div>" ); up.refresh(); // Reposition Flash/Silverlight }); uploader.bind('FileUploaded', function (up, file, response) { var result = $.parseJSON(response.response); // console.log(result); $('#' + file.id).remove(); if (result.success) { $('#profile-image').css('background-image','url("'+result.html+'")'); $('#profile-image').attr('data-profileurl',result.html); $('#profile-image_id').val(result.attach); var all_id=$('#attachid').val(); all_id=all_id+","+result.attach; $('#attachid').val(all_id); $('#imagelist').append('<div class="uploaded_images" data- imageid="'+result.attach+'"><img src="'+result.html+'" alt="thumb" /><i class="fa deleter fa-trash-o"></i> </div>'); delete_binder(); thumb_setter(); } }); $('#aaiu-uploader').click(function (e) { uploader.start(); e.preventDefault(); }); $('#aaiu-uploader2').click(function (e) { uploader.start(); e.preventDefault(); }); } });

    Read the article

  • Flex DataBinding Drilling Down Through Arrays

    - by Joshua
    The help page on the BindUtils.bindProperty function: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/langref/mx/binding/utils/BindingUtils.html Has this to say: "For example, to bind the property host.a.b.c, call the method as: bindProperty(host, ["a","b","c"], ...)." But what if I need to bind to host.a.b[2].c? How do I do that?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET web control with the same ID

    - by user370401
    On an ASP.NET page, if the ASP.NET elements like <asp:Texbox ID="Textbox1"> appears in more than one place, are they the same Textbox object or are they different objects with the same name "Textbox1"? If the same, "why won't it cause any conflicts?" E.G. runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Name") %' runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Name") %' '

    Read the article

  • How to get if the object already retrieved in inject

    - by zerkms
    Is it possible to know that particular dependency already has been satisfied by ninject kernel? To be clear: Let's suppose we have this module: Bind<IA>().To<A>(); Bind<IB>().To<B>(); And some "client"-code: var a = kernel.Get<IA>(); // how to get here "true" for assumption: "IA was requested (once)" // and "false" for: "IB was not requested ever"

    Read the article

  • Binding files in C#?

    - by ravedome
    Hey, Is it possible to bind two files into one file ? If its possible how ? E.g if i got two files a.exe and b.exe then i want to bind them into c.exe so when i execute c.exe it'll automatically execute a.exe and b.exe Thank

    Read the article

  • Can you do conventions-based binding with StructureMap 2.5.3?

    - by Peter Goras
    I find one of the best features of Ninject is conventions-based binding. eg. Bind<IConfigurationSource>().To<RemoteConfigurationSource>() .Only(When.Context.Target.Name.BeginsWith("remote")); Bind<IConfigurationSource>().To<LocalConfigurationSource>() .Only(When.Context.Target.Name.BeginsWith("local")); http://ninject.codeplex.com/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Conventions-Based%20Binding&referringTitle=Home Is this possible in StructureMap 2.5.3? Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90  | Next Page >