Search Results

Search found 5202 results on 209 pages for 'char'.

Page 88/209 | < Previous Page | 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95  | Next Page >

• c: memory allocation (what's going on)

  - by facha

  Hi, everyone Please take a look at this piece of code. I'm allocating one byte for the first variable and another byte for the second one. However, it seems like the compiler allocates more (or I'm missing something). The program outputs both strings, even though their length is more the one byte. void main() { char* some1 = malloc(1); sprintf(some1,"cool"); char* some2 = malloc(1); sprintf(some2,"face"); printf("%s ",some1); printf("%s\n",some2); } Please, could anyone spot some light on what's going on when memory is being allocated.

  Read the article

• Please see following code and answer

  - by user323422

  template <class T> class _cExplicitInstation { public: void show1(T c) { double d =10.02 ; std::cout<<c; } void show2(T d) { std::cout<<d; } }; template _cExplicitInstation<char>; template void _cExplicitInstation<int>::show1(int c); int main() { _cExplicitInstation<char> abc; _cExplicitInstation<int>().show2(10);// it should show error as i have // explicitly declare for show1() function but its working // can u tell why? }

  Read the article

• Correct way to initialize a NULL-terminated array of strings in C

  - by jjardon

  Is this code correct? char *argv[] = { "foo", "bar", NULL };

  Read the article

• Storing objects in STL vector - minimal set of methods

  - by osgx

  Hello What is "minimal framework" (necessary methods) of object, which I will store in STL <vector>? For my assumptions: #include <vector> #include <cstring> using namespace std; class Doit { private: char *a; public: Doit(){a=(char*)malloc(10);} ~Doit(){free(a);} }; int main(){ vector<Doit> v(10); } gives *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x0804b008 *** Aborted and in valgrind: malloc/free: 2 allocs, 12 frees, 50 bytes allocated.

  Read the article

• Scala, make my loop more functional

  - by Pengin

  I'm trying to reduce the extent to which I write Scala (2.8) like Java. Here's a simplification of a problem I came across. Can you suggest improvements on my solutions that are "more functional"? Transform the map val inputMap = mutable.LinkedHashMap(1->'a',2->'a',3->'b',4->'z',5->'c') by discarding any entries with value 'z' and indexing the characters as they are encountered First try var outputMap = new mutable.HashMap[Char,Int]() var counter = 0 for(kvp <- inputMap){ val character = kvp._2 if(character !='z' && !outputMap.contains(character)){ outputMap += (character -> counter) counter += 1 } } Second try (not much better, but uses an immutable map and a 'foreach') var outputMap = new immutable.HashMap[Char,Int]() var counter = 0 inputMap.foreach{ case(number,character) => { if(character !='z' && !outputMap.contains(character)){ outputMap2 += (character -> counter) counter += 1 } } }

  Read the article

• How do you detach an array of strings from shared memory? C

  - by Tim

  I have: int array_id; char* records[10]; // get the shared segment if ((array_id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 1, 0666)) == -1) { perror("Array Creating"); } // attach records[0] = (char*) shmat(array_id, (void*)0, 0); if ((int) *records == -1) { perror("Array Attachment"); } which works fine, but when i try and detach i get an "invalid argument" error. // detach int error; if( (error = shmdt((void*) records[0])) == -1) { perror(array detachment); } any ideas? thank you

  Read the article

• How do I insert format str and don't remove the matched regular expression in input string in boost:

  - by Yadollah

  I want to put space between punctuations and other words in a sentence. But boost::regex_replace() replaces the punctuation with space, and I want to keep a punctuation in the sentence! for example in this code the output should be "Hello . hi , " regex e1("[.,]"); std::basic_string<char> str = "Hello.hi,"; std::basic_string<char> fmt = " "; cout<<regex_replace(str, e1, fmt)<<endl; Can you help me?

  Read the article

• reading unicode

  - by user121196

  I'm using java io to retrieve text from a server that might output character such as é. then output it using System.err, they turn out to be '?'. I am using UTF8 encoding. what's wrong? int len=0; char[]buffer=new char[1024]; OutputStream os = sock.getOutputStream(); InputStream is = sock.getInputStream(); os.write(query.getBytes("UTF8"));//iso8859_1")); Reader reader = new InputStreamReader(is, Charset.forName("UTF-8")); do{ len = reader.read(buffer); if (len0) { if(outstring==null)outstring=new StringBuffer(); outstring.append(buffer,0,len); } }while(len0); System.err.println(outstring);

  Read the article

• parsing command option with default values and range constrains in C

  - by agramfort

  Hi, I need to parse command line arguments in C. My arguments are basically int or float with default values and range constrains. I've started to implement something that look like this: option_float(float* out, int argc, char* argv, char* name, description, float default_val, int is_optional, float min_value, float max_value) which I call for example with: float* pct; option_float(pct, argc, argv, "pct", "My super percentage option", 50, 1, FALSE, 0, 100) however I don't want to reinvent the wheel ! My objective is to have error checking of range constrains, throw an error when the option is not optional and is not set. And generate the help message usually given by usage() function. The usage text would look like this: --pct My super percentage option (default : 50). Should be in [0, 100] I've started with getopt but it is too limited for what I want to do and I feel it still requires me to write too much code for a simple usecase like this. thanks

  Read the article

• Why do i get segfault at the end of the application after everything's beed done properly ?

  - by VaioIsBorn

  #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> int main(void) { unsigned char *stole; unsigned char pass[] = "m4ak47"; printf("Vnesi password: \t"); scanf("%s", stole); if(strncmp(stole, pass, sizeof(pass)) != 0) { printf("wrong password!\n"); exit(0); } else printf("Password correct\n"); printf("some stuf here...\n\n"); return 0; } This program is working nice, but with one problem - if the password is correct then it DOES do the printing of 'some stuf here...' but it also shows me segmentation fault error at the end. Why ?

  Read the article

• Solving C++ 'target of assignment not really an lvalue' errors

  - by Jason

  Given this code: void FrMemCopy(void *to, const void *from, size_t sz) { size_t sz8 = sz >> 3; size_t sz1 = sz - (sz8 << 3); while (sz8-- != 0) { *((double *)to)++ = *((double *)from)++; } while (sz1-- != 0) { *((char *)to)++ = *((char *)from)++; } } I am receiving target of assignment not really an lvalue warnings on the 2 lines inside the while loops. Can anyone break down those lines? a cast then an increment? What is a simplier way to write that? What does the error mean?

  Read the article

• Flex, continuous scanning stream (from socket). Did I miss something using yywrap()?

  - by Diederich Kroeske

  Working on a socketbased scanner (continuous stream) using Flex for pattern recognition. Flex doesn't find a match that overlaps 'array bounderies'. So I implemented yywrap() to setup new array content as soon yylex() detects < (it will call yywrap). No success so far. Basically (for pin-pointing my problem) this is my code: %{ #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define BUFFERSIZE 26 /* 0123456789012345678901234 */ char cbuf1[BUFFERSIZE] = "Hello everybody, lex is su"; // Warning, no '\0' char cbuf2[BUFFERSIZE] = "per cool. Thanks! "; char recvBuffer[BUFFERSIZE]; int packetCnt = 0; YY_BUFFER_STATE bufferState1, bufferState2; %} %option nounput %option noinput %% "super" { ECHO; } . { printf( "%c", yytext[0] );} %% int yywrap() { int retval = 1; printf(">> yywrap()\n"); if( packetCnt <= 0 ) // Stop after 2 { // Copy cbuf2 into recvBuffer memcpy(recvBuffer, cbuf2, BUFFERSIZE); // yyrestart(NULL); // ?? has no effect // Feed new data to flex bufferState2 = yy_scan_bytes(recvBuffer, BUFFERSIZE); // packetCnt++; // Tell flex to resume scanning retval = 0; } return(retval); } int main(void) { printf("Lenght: %d\n", (int)sizeof(recvBuffer)) ; // Copy cbuf1 into recvBuffer memcpy(recvBuffer, cbuf1, BUFFERSIZE); // packetCnt = 0; // bufferState1 = yy_scan_bytes(recvBuffer, BUFFERSIZE); // yylex(); yy_delete_buffer(bufferState1); yy_delete_buffer(bufferState2); return 0; } This is my output: dkmbpro:test dkroeske$ ./text Lenght: 26 Hello everybody, lex is su>> yywrap() per cool. Thanks! >> yywrap() So no match on 'super'. According to the doc the lexxer is not 'reset' between yywrap's. What do I miss? Thanks.

  Read the article

• SQL Query taking too long

  - by user345426

  I am trying to optimize the SQL query listed below. It is basically a search engine code that retrieves products based on the products name. It also checks products model number and whether or not it is enabled. This executes in about 1.6 seconds when I run it directly through the phpMyAdmin tool but takes about 3 seconds in total to load in conjunction with the PHP file it is placed in. I need to add a category search functionality and now that is crashing the MySQL server, HELP! SELECT DISTINCT p.products_id , p.products_image , p.products_price , s.specials_new_products_price, p.products_weight , p.products_unit_quantity , pd.products_name , pd.products_img_alt , pd.products_affiliate_url FROM products AS p LEFT JOIN vendors v ON v.vendors_id = p.vendors_id LEFT JOIN specials AS s ON s.products_id = p.products_id AND s.status = 1, categories AS c , products_description AS pd , products_to_categories AS p2c WHERE ( ( pd.products_name LIKE '%cleaning%' AND pd.products_name LIKE '%supplies%' ) OR ( p.products_model LIKE '%cleaning%' AND p.products_model LIKE '%supplies%' ) OR p.products_id = 'cleaning supplies' OR v.vendors_prefix = 'cleaning supplies' OR CONCAT( CAST(v.vendors_prefix AS CHAR), '-', CAST(p.products_id AS CHAR) ) = 'cleaning supplies' ) AND p.products_status = '1' AND c.categories_status = '1' AND p.products_id = pd.products_id AND p2c.products_id = pd.products_id AND p2c.categories_id = c.categories_id ORDER BY pd.products_name

  Read the article

• How can I declare a pointer with filled information in C++?

  - by chacham15

  typedef struct Pair_s { char *first; char *second; } Pair; Pair pairs[] = { {"foo", "bar"}, //this is fine {"bar", "baz"} }; typedef struct PairOfPairs_s { Pair *first; Pair *second; } PairOfPairs; PairOfPairs pops[] = { {{"foo", "bar"}, {"bar", "baz"}}, //How can i create an equivalent of this NEATLY {&pairs[0], &pairs[1]} //this is not considered neat (imagine trying to read a list of 30 of these) }; How can I achieve the above style declaration semantics?

  Read the article

• Function naming: sendCharacter or receiveCharacter?

  - by bobobobo

  I'm trying to name a function that runs when a character is received by the object. For the caller, it should be named sendCharacter, so that it can call: object->sendCharacter( character ) ; That looks nice for the caller.. but for the receiver, it implements a method /// Called when this object is do something /// with a character /// from the caller void sendCharacter( char c ) ; So for the recipient class, it looks like this method will actually send a character out, not receive one. So then, I could call the function receiveCharacter /// Called when this object is do something /// with a character /// from the caller void receiveCharacter( char c ) ; But now the caller does this: object->receiveCharacter( character ) ; Which just looks odd. How can I better name this function?

  Read the article

• What is wrong with my version of strchr?

  - by Eduard Saakashvili

  My assignment is to write my own version of strchr, yet it doesn't seem to work. Any advice would be much appreciated. Here it is: char *strchr (const char *s, int c) //we are looking for c on the string s { int dog; //This is the index on the string, initialized as 0 dog = 0; int point; //this is the pointer to the location given by the index point = &s[dog]; while ((s[dog] != c) && (s[dog] != '\0')) { //it keeps adding to dog until it stumbles upon either c or '\0' dog++; } if (s[dog]==c) { return point; //at this point, if this value is equal to c it returns the pointer to that location } else { return NULL; //if not, this means that c is not on the string } }

  Read the article

• c++ fread changing fgetpos strangely

  - by Steve

  If I run: FILE* pFile = fopen("c:\\08.bin", "r"); fpos_t pos; char buf[5000]; int ret = fread(&buf, 1, 9, pFile); fgetpos(pFile, &pos); I get ret = 9 and pos = 9. However if I run FILE* pFile = fopen("c:\\08.bin", "r"); fpos_t pos; char buf[5000]; int ret = fread(&buf, 1, 10, pFile); fgetpos(pFile, &pos); ret = 10 as expected, but pos = 11! How can this be?

  Read the article

• What is wrong with this c strdup code?

  - by bstullkid

  Consider this code: char *strs[] = { "string1", "string2", NULL }; char *ptr1 = NULL, *ptr2 = NULL, *tmp; short iter = 0; tmp = ptr1; while (iter < 2) { tmp = strdup(strs[iter]); tmp = ptr2; iter++; } printf("1: %s\n2: %s\n", ptr1, ptr2); I want this to output "string1\nstring2\n" however str1 and str2 remain null. What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• mysql++ compile error

  - by rizzo0917

  when i complie code that includes mysql headers i get the following errors: c:\qt\2010.03\mingw\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../include/stdint.h:27: error: 'int8_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef signed char int8_t' c:\qt\2010.03\mingw\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../include/stdint.h:31: error: 'int32_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef int int32_t' c:\qt\2010.03\mingw\bin../lib/gcc/mingw32/4.4.0/../../../../include/stdint.h:32: error: 'uint32_t' has a previous declaration as 'typedef unsigned int uint32_t' Literally all I do is this. include cppconn/driver.h include cppconn/exception.h include cppconn/resultset.h include cppconn/statement.h include Now I can go into the file and comment the lines out that give me errors //typedef signed char int8_t; //typedef int int32_t; //typedef unsigned uint32_t; It compiles, but when I try to run the mysql code: sql::Driver *driver; driver = get_driver_instance(); I get this output test.exe exited with code -1073741515 Any Ideas?

  Read the article

• function in c language

  - by sandy101

  Hello, I am practice the function in c and come across to the program .... include int main() { float a=15.5; char ch ='C'; printit(a,ch); return 0; } printit(a,ch) { printf("%f\n%c",a,ch); } I want to know that why the above program compile and not give the error as i understood so for is ... 1) The function in c must be declared with the specific prototype (but this program does not contain the prototype ) 2)why the program give the output 'x'for the char variable 3)can the function in c are capable of accepting the value without being declared about type in parameters like what has done in the function declaration .... plz.... help

  Read the article

• Function argument treated as undeclared

  - by Mikulas Dite

  I've prepared this simple example which is not working for me #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> FILE *fp; char filename[] = "damy.txt"; void echo (char[] text) { fp = fopen(filename, "a"); fwrite(text, 1, strlen(text), fp); fclose(fp); printf(text); } int main () { echo("foo bar"); return 0; } It's supposed to write both to command window and to file. However, this gives compilation error - the text used in echo() is not declared. Does c need another declaration of the variable?

  Read the article

• c++ template function compiles in header but not implementation

  - by flies

  I'm trying to learn templates and I've run into this confounding error. I'm declaring some functions in a header file and I want to make a separate implementation file where the functions will be defined. Here's the code that calls the header (dum.cpp): #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <string> #include "dumper2.h" int main() { std::vector<int> v; for (int i=0; i<10; i++) { v.push_back(i); } test(); std::string s = ", "; dumpVector(v,s); } now, here's a working header file (dumper2.h): #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <vector> void test(); template <class T> void dumpVector( std::vector<T> v,std::string sep); template <class T> void dumpVector(std::vector<T> v, std::string sep) { typename std::vector<T>::iterator vi; vi = v.begin(); std::cout << *vi; vi++; for (;vi<v.end();vi++) { std::cout << sep << *vi ; } std::cout << "\n"; return; } with implentation (dumper2.cpp): #include <iostream> #include "dumper2.h" void test() { std::cout << "!olleh dlrow\n"; } the weird thing is that if I move the code that defines dumpVector from the .h to the .cpp file, I get the following error: g++ -c dumper2.cpp -Wall -Wno-deprecated g++ dum.cpp -o dum dumper2.o -Wall -Wno-deprecated /tmp/ccKD2e3G.o: In function `main': dum.cpp:(.text+0xce): undefined reference to `void dumpVector<int>(std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [dum] Error 1 So why does it work one way and not the other? Clearly the compiler can find test(), so why can't it find dumpVector?

  Read the article

• Class Members Over Exports

  - by VirusEcks

  When Using DLLs or Code-injecting to be Specific this is an example class only intended for explaining class test { int newint1; char newchararray[512]; void (*newfunction1)( int newarg1 ); int newfunction2( bool newarg1, char newarg2 ) { return newint1; } } mynewclass1; that covers most common elements that's included in classes now when exporting this function to another DLL or application and missed an element of those, either data member or function member, private or public what happens or changed their order ? and if each function is assigned it's value when Code-Injecting like mynewclass1.newfunction1 = (void *)(newexportedfunction); what's the happens in this case, if members of the class are pointers that are assigned after class construction and then missed one member or changed their order ?

  Read the article

• Const-Qualification of Main's Parameters in C++

  - by pt2cv

  The C++ standard mandates that all conforming implementations support the following two signatures for main: int main(); int main(int, char*[]); In case of the latter signature, would the addition of (top-level) const-ness break any language rules? For example: int main(const int argc, char** const argv); From my understanding, top-level const qualification doesn't affect the function's signature hash, so it should be legal as far as the specification is concerned. Also, did anyone ever encounter an implementation which rejected this type of modification?

  Read the article

• c++: truth assignment warning with arguments?

  - by John

  I use the following to work with arguments in my programs, but it seems to just hand me a warning (just a warning): "warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value" The beginning of the code is as follows: enum{OPT_DISP_H = 0x2, OPT_DISP_W = 0x1}; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int opt = 0x00; char c; while((++argv)[0] && argv[0][0]=='-'){ while(c =* ++argv[0]) switch(c){ case 'h': opt |= OPT_DISP_H; break; //etc.. The while(c =* ++argv[0]) part being where the warning persists. The code works fine, but what does this warning mean opposed to what is used? I think the code is c = *++argv[0], using the pointer. So why does the single = work and what is really recommended to be used?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95  | Next Page >