Search Results

Search found 884 results on 36 pages for 'fred hh'.

Page 9/36 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • DateTime And ParseExact Problems

    - by WizardsSleeve
    Hi There I wish to convert my string in format dd/mm/yyyy hh:mm:ss to a DateTime of the same format. Dim ukCulture As System.Globalization.CultureInfo = New System.Globalization.CultureInfo("en-GB") Dim myDateTime As DateTime myDateTime = DateTime.ParseExact("18/05/2010 23:42:10, "dd/MM/yyyy HH:mm:ss", ukCulture) When I step through this code the variable myDateTime is 05/18/2010 23:42:10 it appears that the dd/mm is the wrong way around and I cant work out how to correct this. Can ayone offer any guidance on how to correct this please?

    Read the article

  • Java: immutability, overuse of stack -- better data structure?

    - by HH
    I overused hashSets but it was slow, then changed to Stacks, speed boost-up. Poly's reply uses Collections.emptyList() as immutable list, cutting out excess null-checkers. No Collections.emptyStack(). Combining the words stack and immutability, from the last experiences, gets "immutable stack" (probably not related to functional prog). Java Api 5 for list interface shows that Stack is an implementing class for list and arraylist, here. The java.coccurrent pkg does not have any immutable Stack data structure. The first hinted of misusing stack. The lack of immutabily in the last and poly's book recommendation leads way to list. Something very primitive, fast, no extra layers, with methods like emptyThing(). Overuse of stack and where I use it DataFile.java: public Stack<DataFile> files; FileObject.java: public Stack<String> printViews = new Stack<String>(); FileObject.java:// private static Stack<Object> getFormat(File f){return (new Format(f)).getFormat();} Format.java: private Stack<Object> getLine(File[] fs,String s){return wF;} Format.java: private Stack<Object> getFormat(){return format;} Positions.java: public static Stack<Integer[]> getPrintPoss(String s,File f,Integer maxViewPerF) Positions.java: Stack<File> possPrint = new Stack<File>(); Positions.java: Stack<Integer> positions=new Stack<Integer>(); Record.java: private String getFormatLine(Stack<Object> st) Record.java: Stack<String> lines=new Stack<String>(); SearchToUser.java: public static final Stack<File> allFiles = findf.getFs(); SearchToUser.java: public static final Stack<File> allDirs = findf.getDs(); SearchToUser.java: private Stack<Integer[]> positionsPrint=new Stack<Integer[]>(); SearchToUser.java: public Stack<String> getSearchResults(String s, Integer countPerFile, Integer resCount) SearchToUser.java: Stack<File> filesToS=Fs2Word.getFs2W(s,50); SearchToUser.java: Stack<String> rs=new Stack<String>(); View.java: public Stack<Integer[]> poss = new Stack<Integer[4]>(); View.java: public static Stack<String> getPrintViewsFileWise(String s,Object[] df,Integer maxViewsPerF) View.java: Stack<String> substrings = new Stack<String>(); View.java: private Stack<String> printViews=new Stack<String>(); View.java: MatchView(Stack<Integer> pss,File f,Integer maxViews) View.java: Stack<String> formatFile; View.java: private Stack<Search> files; View.java: private Stack<File> matchingFiles; View.java: private Stack<String> matchViews; View.java: private Stack<String> searchMatches; View.java: private Stack<String> getSearchResults(Integer numbResults) Easier with List: AllDirs and AllFs, now looping with push, but list has more pow. methods such as addAll [OLD] From Stack to some immutable data structure How to get immutable Stack data structure? Can I box it with list? Should I switch my current implementatios from stacks to Lists to get immutable? Which immutable data structure is Very fast with about similar exec time as Stack? No immutability to Stack with Final import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public class TestStack{ public static void main(String[] args) { final Stack<Integer> test = new Stack<Integer>(); Stack<Integer> test2 = new Stack<Integer>(); test.push(37707); test2.push(80437707); //WHY is there not an error to remove an elment // from FINAL stack? System.out.println(test.pop()); System.out.println(test2.pop()); } }

    Read the article

  • Java: immutable Stack?

    - by HH
    I chose to use Stacks and Tables before knowing Collections has immutable empty things only for Set, Map and List. Because the size of table does not change after its init: Integer[] table = new Intger[0] I can use the zero-witdh table as an empty table. But I cannot use final or empty Stack to get immutable Stack: No immutability to Stack with Final import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public class TestStack{ public static void main(String[] args) { final Stack<Integer> test = new Stack<Integer>(); Stack<Integer> test2 = new Stack<Integer>(); test.push(37707); test2.push(80437707); //WHY is there not an error to remove an elment // from FINAL stack? System.out.println(test.pop()); System.out.println(test2.pop()); } } Java Api 5 for list interface shows that Stack is an implementing class for list and arraylist, here. The java.coccurrent pkg does not have any immutable Stack data structure. From Stack to some immutable data structure How to get immutable Stack data structure? Can I box it with list? Should I switch my current implementatios from stacks to Lists to get immutable? Which immutable data structure is Very fast with about similar exec time as Stack?

    Read the article

  • Java: static-non-static-this problem

    - by HH
    $ javac TestFilter.java TestFilter.java:19: non-static variable this cannot be referenced from a static context for(File f : file.listFiles(this.filterFiles)){ ^ 1 error $ sed -i 's@this@TestFilter@g' TestFilter.java $ javac TestFilter.java $ java TestFilter file1 file2 file3 TestFilter.java import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public class TestFilter { private static final FileFilter filterFiles; // STATIC! static{ filterFiles = new FileFilter() { // Not Static below. When static, an error: // "accept(java.io.File) in cannot implement // accept(java.io.File) in java.io.FileFilter; // overriding method is static" // // I tried to solve by the change the problem at the bottom. public boolean accept(File file) { return file.isFile(); } }; } // STATIC! public static void main(String[] args){ HashSet<File> files = new HashSet<File>(); File file = new File("."); // IT DID NOT WORK WITH "This" but with "TestFilter". // Why do I get the error with "This" but not with "TestFilter"? for(File f : file.listFiles(TestFilter.filterFiles)){ System.out.println(f.getName()); files.add(f); } } }

    Read the article

  • Java: exception-throwing class?

    - by HH
    I have classes DirReader and Search. The search uses DirReader. I want the search to know when DirReader throws exception. So how can I have class throwing exception? Currently, I use initCorrect -dummy var. Exception-style method may be more appropriate. Simplified Example Error $ javac ExceptionStatic.java ExceptionStatic.java:4: '{' expected public class ExceptionStatic throws Exception{ ^ 1 error Code import java.util.*; import java.io.*; // THIS PART NEEDS TO BE FIXED: public class ExceptionStatic throws Exception{ private static boolean initCorrect = false; public static String hello; static{ try{ hello = "hallo"; //some other conditionals in real code if( true) throw new Exception(); initCorrect=true; }catch(Exception e){ e.printStackTrace(); } } public static void main(String[] args){ if(initCorrect) System.out.println(hello); } }

    Read the article

  • Unix: how to have delimiter as "\t&\t" in paste-tool?

    - by HH
    Results are in clean files. I want to get them to latex-table format with paste. So how can I have a delimiter "\t&\t"? or is there some Latex tool? Pasting Columnwise to have \t&\t delimiter $ paste -d'\t\&\t' d d_powered_-2 rad 5.0 400.0&384.5 7.5 204.1&184.5 10.0 100.0&115.5 15.0 44.4&58.2 20.0 25.0&45.0 25.0 16.0&38.8 30.0 11.1&33.3 35.0 8.2&34.4 37.0 7.3&34.1 40.0 6.2&34.1 $ paste d d_powered_-2 rad 5.0 400.0 384.5 7.5 204.1 184.5 10.0 100.0 115.5 15.0 44.4 58.2 20.0 25.0 45.0 25.0 16.0 38.8 30.0 11.1 33.3 35.0 8.2 34.4 37.0 7.3 34.1 40.0 6.2 34.1

    Read the article

  • Explain BFS and DFS in terms of backtracking

    - by HH
    Wikipedia about DFS Depth-first search (DFS) is an algorithm for traversing or searching a tree, tree structure, or graph. One starts at the root (selecting some node as the root in the graph case) and explores as far as possible along each branch before backtracking. So is BFS? "an algorithm that choose a starting node, checks all nodes -- backtracks --, chooses the shortest path, chose neighbour nodes -- backtracks --, chose the shortest path -- finally finds the optimal path because of traversing each path due to continuos backtracking. Regex, find's pruning -- backtracking? The term backtracking confuseses due to its variety of use. UNIX find's pruning an SO-user explained with backtracking. Regex Buddy uses the term "catastrophic backtracking" if you do not limit the scope of your Regexes. It seems to be too wide umbrella-term. So: how do you define "Backtracking" GRAPH-theoretically? what is "backtracking" in BFS and DFS?

    Read the article

  • Java: how to use 3rd-party library?

    - by HH
    $ cat MultiTest.java import com.*; // CODE $ javac Code.java MultiTest.java:1: package com does not exist import com.*; ^ Google Collections Com-dir in the dir where the MultiTest.java -file is located.

    Read the article

  • Javascript: how to document.print option value in Select block?

    - by HH
    The below returns [object HTMLOptionElement] while I try to return the value. document.write(document.getElementById("allSelect").options[0]).value; by value, I mean the thing called value there (there is a form around it but not relevant now): <select name="allSelect" id="allSelect" size=3> <option value="1"selected">1</option> <option value="2">2</option> <option value="3">3</option> </select> How can I return the value of an option?

    Read the article

  • Java: error handling with try-catch, empty-try-catch, dummy-return

    - by HH
    A searh uses recursively defined function that easily throws exceptions. I have tried 3 ways to handle exeptions: to ignore with an empty-try-catch() add-dummy-return stop err-propagation due to exeption throw a specific except. (this part I don't really understand. If I throw except, can I force it to continue elsewhere, not continuing the old except-thrown-path?) Some exceptions I do not realy care like during execution removed files -exception (NullPointer) but some I really do like unknown things. Possible exceptions: // 1. if a temp-file or some other file removed during execution -> except. // 2. if no permiss. -> except. // 3. ? --> except. The code is Very import for the whole program. I earlier added clittered-checks, try-catches, avoided-empty-try-catches but it really blurred the logic. Some stoned result here would make the code later much easier to maintain. It was annoying to track random exeptions due to some random temp-file removal! How would you handle exceptions for the critical part? Code public class Find { private Stack<File> fs=new Stack<File>(); private Stack<File> ds=new Stack<File>(); public Stack<File> getD(){ return ds;} public Stack<File> getF(){ return fs;} public Find(String path) { // setting this type of special checks due to errs // propagation makes the code clittered if(path==null) { System.out.println("NULL in Find(path)"); System.exit(9); } this.walk(path); } private void walk( String path ) { File root = new File( path ); File[] list = root.listFiles(); //TODO: dangerous with empty try-catch?! try{ for ( File f : list ) { if ( f.isDirectory() ) { walk( f.getAbsolutePath() ); ds.push(f); } else { fs.push(f); } } }catch(Exception e){e.printStackTrace();} } } Code refactored from here.

    Read the article

  • Java: initialization problem with private-final-int-value and empty constructor

    - by HH
    $ javac InitInt.java InitInt.java:7: variable right might not have been initialized InitInt(){} ^ 1 error $ cat InitInt.java import java.util.*; import java.io.*; public class InitInt { private final int right; InitInt(){} public static void main(String[] args) { // I don't want to assign any value. // just initialize it, how? InitInt test = new InitInt(); System.out.println(test.getRight()); // later assiging a value } public int getRight(){return right;} } Initialization problem with Constructor InitInt{ // Still the error, "may not be initialized" // How to initialise it? if(snippetBuilder.length()>(charwisePos+25)){ right=charwisePos+25; }else{ right=snippetBuilder.length()-1; } }

    Read the article

  • Java: why is declaration not sufficient in interface?

    - by HH
    Big class contains Format-interfcase and Format-class. The Format-class contains the methods and the interface has the values of the fields. I could have the fields in the class Format but the goal is with Interface. So do I just create dummy-vars to get the errors away, design issue or something ELSE? KEY: Declaration VS Initialisation Explain by the terms, why you have to init in interface. What is the logic behind it? To which kind of problems it leads the use of interface? Sample Code having the init-interface-problem import java.util.*; import java.io.*; public class FormatBig { private static class Format implements Format { private static long getSize(File f){return f.length();} private static long getTime(File f){return f.lastModified();} private static boolean isFile(File f){if(f.isFile()){return true;}} private static boolean isBinary(File f){return Match.isBinary(f);} private static char getType(File f){return Match.getTypes(f);} private static String getPath(File f){return getNoErrPath(f);} //Java API: isHidden, --- SYSTEM DEPENDED: toURI, toURL Format(File f) { // PUZZLE 0: would Stack<Object> be easier? size=getSize(f); time=getTime(f); isfile=isFile(f); isBinary=isBinary(f); type=getType(f); path=getPath(f); //PUZZLE 1: how can simplify the assignment? values.push(size); values.push(time); values.push(isfile); values.push(isBinary); values.push(type); values.push(path); } } public static String getNoErrPath(File f) { try{return f.getCanonicalPath(); }catch(Exception e){e.printStackTrace();} } public static final interface Format { //ERR: IT REQUIRES "=" public long size; public long time; public boolean isFile=true; //ERROR goes away if I initialise wit DUMMY public boolean isBinary; public char type; public String path; Stack<Object> values=new Stack<Object>(); } public static void main(String[] args) { Format fm=new Format(new File(".")); for(Object o:values){System.out.println(o);} } }

    Read the article

  • Java : method to to print relative pathname?

    - by HH
    I am hesitant just to look at some env.vars and try to replace things with regexes. So is there a ready method to print relative pathnames system-independently? $ echo ~ /u/user $ pwd /u/user/OH/one/src $ echo "Like relative pathnames ~/OH/one/src, not /u/user/OH/one/src."

    Read the article

  • Awk: how to have backclashes in printf?

    - by HH
    Works: awk '{print $$1"\t&\t"$$2"\t\\\\"}' .file > file.tex Does not work, why? awk '{printf %.2f"\t&\t"\.2f"\t\\\\",$$1,$$2}' .file > file.tex Error: awk: {printf %.2f"\t&\t"\.2f"\t\\\\",$1,$2} awk: ^ backslash not last character on line

    Read the article

  • Stand-alone Bytecode Verifier

    - by HH
    In my bytecode instrumentation project, I stumble frequently on VerifyErrors. However, the default java Verifier gives little information on which instruction resulted in the error (it only gives the method and a small message). Is there any stand-alone bytecode verifier which provides with a little more advanced help in locating the error, at least the precise instruction location? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • LaTex: why partially showing up references?

    - by HH
    The bib.style part may be the problem. If I do not reference to references, do they show up? I have listed all errors below, the file compiles so I don't know whether they are related to partially-showing-up-references. For example, work with many authors gets only one author listed. I want to see references fully, not partially. Headers $ grep bib header.tex \usepackage{natbib} \bibliographystyle{abbrvnat} Errors $ grep -n -A 7 -B 7 Error *.log combined.log-505-! Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted). combined.log-506-<to be read again> combined.log-507- \futurelet combined.log-508-l.353 \hline combined.log-509- combined.log-510-? combined.log-511- combined.log:512:! Package caption Error: cite undefined. combined.log-513- combined.log-514-See the caption package documentation for explanation. combined.log-515-Type H <return> for immediate help. combined.log-516- ... combined.log-517- combined.log-518-l.374 ...n={CPU O(mlog(n))}, cite={topcoder:node}] combined.log-519- -- combined.log-559- [] combined.log-560- combined.log-561-) [10] combined.log-562-\openout2 = `references.aux'. combined.log-563- combined.log-564- (./references.tex combined.log-565- combined.log:566:! LaTeX Error: \include cannot be nested. combined.log-567- combined.log-568-See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. combined.log-569-Type H <return> for immediate help. combined.log-570- ... combined.log-571- combined.log-572-l.1 \include{timeUse.tex} Bibs.bib @misc{ Gundersen, author = "G. Gundersen", title = "Data Structures in Java for Matrix Computations", year = "2002" } @book{ Lennart, author = "R. Lennart", title = "Mathematics Handbook for Science and Engineering BETA", year = "2004" }

    Read the article

  • Java: remove-common-words-method in the API?

    - by HH
    Related: Forum post Before reinventing the wheel, I need to know whether such method exists. Stripping words according to a list such as list does not sound challenging but there are linguistic aspects, such as which words to stress the most in stripping, how about context?

    Read the article

  • Java: minimum number of operations for conjunctive inequalities?

    - by HH
    I try to simplify conditionals in for (int t=0,size=fo.getPrintViewsPerFile().size();t<size&&t<countPerFile;t++){, more precisely: t<s&&t<c You need to compare two times, then calc the boolean value from them. Is there any simpler way to do it? If no, how can you prove it? I can simplify it to some extent, proof tree.

    Read the article

  • Java: startingPath as "public static final" exception

    - by HH
    [Updated] Thanks to polygenelubricants's reply, the real problem is the exception from the method getCanonicalPath() because I cannot include try-catch-loop there. $ cat StartingPath.java import java.util.*; import java.io.*; public class StartingPath { public static final String startingPath = (new File(".")).getCanonicalPath(); public static void main(String[] args){ System.out.println(startingPath); } } $ javac StartingPath.java StartingPath.java:5: unreported exception java.io.IOException; must be caught or declared to be thrown public static final String startingPath = (new File(".")).getCanonicalPath(); ^ 1 error

    Read the article

  • Java: what are IOEXceptions in BufferedReader's readLine() for?

    - by HH
    I can "fix" the below exception with a try-catch loop but I cannot understand the reason. Why does the part "in.readLine()" continuosly ignite IOExceptions? What is really the purpose of throwing such exceptions, the goal probably not just more side effects? Code and IOExceptions $ javac ReadLineTest.java ReadLineTest.java:9: unreported exception java.io.IOException; must be caught or declared to be thrown while((s=in.readLine())!=null){ ^ 1 error $ cat ReadLineTest.java import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public class ReadLineTest { public static void main(String[] args) { String s; BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)); // WHY IOException here? while((s=in.readLine())!=null){ System.out.println(s); } } }

    Read the article

  • Java: dangerous self-returning-recursive function by IOException?

    - by HH
    I had very errorsome Exception handling with if-clauses. An exception occurs if not found path. An exception returns the function again. The function is recursive. Safe? $ javac SubDirs.java $ java SubDirs Give me an path. . HELLO com TOASHEOU google common annotations base collect internal Give me an path. IT WON'T FIND ME, SO IT RETURNS ITSELF due to Exception caught Give me an path. $ cat SubDirs.java import java.io.*; import java.util.*; public class SubDirs { private List<File> getSubdirs(File file) throws IOException { List<File> subdirs = Arrays.asList(file.listFiles(new FileFilter() { public boolean accept(File f) { return f.isDirectory(); } })); subdirs = new ArrayList<File>(subdirs); List<File> deepSubdirs = new ArrayList<File>(); for(File subdir : subdirs) { deepSubdirs.addAll(getSubdirs(subdir)); } subdirs.addAll(deepSubdirs); return subdirs; } public static void search() { try{ BufferedReader in = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)); String s; System.out.println("Give me an path."); while ((s = in.readLine()) != null && s.length() != 0){ SubDirs dirs = new SubDirs(); List<File> subDirs = dirs.getSubdirs(new File(s)); for ( File f : subDirs ) { System.out.println(f.getName()); } System.out.println("Give me an path."); } }catch(Exception e){ // Simple but is it safe? search(); } } public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { search(); } }

    Read the article

  • Java: define terms initialization, declaration and assignment

    - by HH
    I find the defs circular statements, the subjects are defined by their verbs but the verbs are undefined! So how do you define them? The question is central to understand the term final, related. The Circular Definitions itialization: to initilise a variable. It can be can be done at the time of declaration. assignment: to assign value to a variable. It can be done anywhere. declaration: to declare value to a variable.

    Read the article

  • Java: repetition, overuse -- problem?

    - by HH
    I try to be as minimalist as possible. Repetition is a problem. I hate it. When is it really a problem? what is static-overuse? what is field-method overuse? what is class-overuse? are there more types of overuse? Problem A: when it is too much to use of static? private static class Data { private static String fileContent; private static SizeSequence lineMap; private static File fileThing; private static char type; private static boolean binary; private static String name; private static String path; } private static class Print { //<1st LINE, LEFT_SIDE, 2nd LINE, RIGHT_SIDE> private Integer[] printPositions=new Integer[4]; private static String fingerPrint; private static String formatPrint; } Problem B: when it is too much to get field data with private methods? public Stack<Integer> getPositions(){return positions;} public Integer[] getPrintPositions(){return printPositions;} private Stack<String> getPrintViews(){return printViews;} private Stack<String> getPrintViewsPerFile(){return printViewsPerFile;} public String getPrintView(){return printView;} public String getFingerPrint(){return fingerPrint;} public String getFormatPrint(){return formatPrint;} public String getFileContent(){return fileContent;} public SizeSequence getLineMap(){return lineMap;} public File getFile(){return fileThing;} public boolean getBinary(){return binary;} public char getType(){return type;} public String getPath(){return path;} public FileObject getData(){return fObj;} public String getSearchTerm(){return searchTerm;} Related interface overuse overuse of static in a Game

    Read the article

  • Java: design problem with final-value and empty constructor

    - by HH
    $ javac InitInt.java InitInt.java:7: variable right might not have been initialized InitInt(){} ^ 1 error $ cat InitInt.java import java.util.*; import java.io.*; public class InitInt { private final int right; // Design Problem? // I feel the initialization problem is just due to bad style. InitInt(){} InitInt{ // Still the error, "may not be initialized" // How to initialise it? if(snippetBuilder.length()>(charwisePos+25)){ right=charwisePos+25; }else{ right=snippetBuilder.length()-1; } } public static void main(String[] args) { InitInt test = new InitInt(); System.out.println(test.getRight()); } public int getRight(){return right;} } Partial Solutions and Suggestions use "this" to access methods in the class, instead of creating empty constructor change final to non-final with final field value: initialize all final values in every constructor remove the empty constructor, keep your code simple and clean

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >