Search Results

Search found 12701 results on 509 pages for 'fulltext index'.

Page 9/509 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • VB.NET: I Cant find the index of an array

    - by steve
    This is the code for my array (which is working) Public numUsers As Integer Public fNameUsers As String = ("..\..\..\users.txt") Public UserRecords As Usersclass() 'note... this line is in a module ' reader = New System.IO.StreamReader(fNameUsers) numUsers = 0 'Split the array up at each delimiter of "," and add new objects ' Do While reader.Peek <> -1 ReDim Preserve UserRecords(numUsers) oneline = reader.ReadLine fields = oneline.Split(",") UserRecords(numUsers) = New Usersclass UserRecords(numUsers).AccountNumber = fields(0) UserRecords(numUsers).CourseName = fields(1) UserRecords(numUsers).FirstName = fields(2) UserRecords(numUsers).LastName = fields(3) UserRecords(numUsers).DOB = fields(4) UserRecords(numUsers).Email = fields(5) UserRecords(numUsers).CourseProgress = (6) UserRecords(numUsers).AdminCheck = fields(7) numUsers = numUsers + 1 Loop reader.Close() My problem is that I don't know how to lookup the index of an array where the .accountNumber = a variable. For example the acccountNumber is 253, what is the code to find the index this relates to???? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Handling click events on z-index'd layers

    - by Alex
    I have 2 z-index layers in a map application I'm building. I have a problem when I click on the layers to zoom in. The click handler is on the underlying z-index layer and I don't want it to fire when a control in the overlying layer is clicked. The problem i have is that the event gets raised no matter what but the originalTarget property of the event is not the image in the underlying layer when something on the top layer is clicked. Is there anyway to change this?

    Read the article

  • Issue with Z-Index and IE7

    - by Chris
    I've browsed on the board and tried and bunch of these solutions and I'm still stuck. The page I'm looking at is here. In IE7, the drop downs are showing up behind the homepage content. And if you go to one of the site sections, by clicking on "Menus", they even show up behind the dynamically created side-bar. I've given the drop down a z-index of 1000 and relative positioning. On the homepage, the images have relative positioning and a small z-index (1 or 2). Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Table or index that goes nowhere

    - by Linchi Shea
    SQL Server allows you to create a table or an index on a filegroup that has no file assigned to it. Because there is no data file to hold anything, the table or the index thus created cannot be used. This may not be a problem because often you would probably use the table or the index 'immeidately', and would realize the problem. Well, you wouldn't be able to go anywhere. But there are cases, especially with an index, where the problem may not be discovered until some time later, and that could cause...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Missing Index on CI_SEV_PROC table (CCB 2.3.1)

    - by ACShorten
    One of our customers reported performance issues with the severence processes in Oracle Utilities Customer Care And Billing V2.3.1 and after investigation a base index was found to be missing in the base package installation scripts. This index can be created manually to address any performance issues in this part of the system. For details of the index creation, refer to the KB Article on My Oracle Support KB 1431632.1 Index Missing On CI_SEV_PROC Table.

    Read the article

  • Getting Started with the New Column Store Index of SQL Server 2012

    Column Store Index, a new feature in SQL Server 2012, improves performance of data warehouse queries several folds. Arshad Ali shows you how to create column store index, and how to use index query hint to include or exclude a column store index. Schedule Azure backupsRed Gate’s Cloud Services makes it simple to create and schedule backups of your SQL Azure databases to Azure blob storage or Amazon S3. Try it for free today.

    Read the article

  • Best way to handle SQL Server fulltext index updates

    - by tlianza
    Hi all, I have a fulltext index which doesn't need to be immediately up-to-date, I'd like to spare myself the I/O (when I do bulk updates, I see a ton of I/O related to the index) and do the index updates during low usage times (nightly, perhaps even weekly). It seems there are two ways to go about this: Turn off change tracking (SET CHANGE_TRACKING OFF) and add a timestamp field to the indexed table, so that you can run alter fulltext index on <table> start INCREMENTAL population, or Enable change tracking, but set it to MANUAL, so that you can run alter fulltext index on <table> start UPDATE population when you need it updated. Is there a preferred method? I couldn't tell from this overview if there was a performance benefit one way or the other. Tom

    Read the article

  • SQL Server database with clustered GUID PKs - switch clustered index or switch to sequential (comb)

    - by Eyvind
    We have a database in which all the PKs are GUIDs, and most of the PKs are also the clustered index for the table. We know that this is bad (due to the random nature of GUIDs). So, it seems there are basically two options here (short of throwing out GUIDs as PKs altogether, which we cannot do (at least not at this time)). We could change the GUID generation algorithm to e.g. the one that NHibernate uses, as detailed in this post, or we could, for the tables that are under the heaviest use, change to a different clustered index, e.g. an IDENTITY column, and keep the "random" GUIDs as PKs. Is it possible to give any general recommendations in such a scenario? The application in question has 500+ tables, the largest one presently at about 1,5 million rows, a few tables around 500 000 rows, and the rest significantly lower (most of them well below 10K). Furthermore, the application is installed at several customer sites already, so we have to take any possible negative effects for existing customer into consideration. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • MS SQL Database with clustered GUID PKs - switch clustered index or switch to sequential (comb) GUID

    - by Eyvind
    We have a database in which all the PKs are GUIDs, and most of the PKs are also the clustered index for the table. We know that this is bad (due to the random nature of GUIDs). So, it seems there are basically two options here (short of throwing out GUIDs as PKs altogether, which we cannot do (at least not at this time)). We could change the GUID generation algorithm to e.g. the one that NHibernate uses, as detailed in this post, or we could, for the tables that are under the heaviest use, change to a different clustered index, e.g. an IDENTITY column, and keep the "random" GUIDs as PKs. Is it possible to give any general recommendations in such a scenario? The application in question has 500+ tables, the largest one presently at about 1,5 million rows, a few tables around 500 000 rows, and the rest significantly lower (most of them well below 10K). Furthermore, the application is installed at several customer sites already, so we have to take any possible negative effects for existing customer into consideration. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • onItemClick gives index/ position of item on visible page ... not actual index of the item in list .

    - by Abhinav
    hi, I am creating a list .. the elements of the list are drawn from sqlite database .. I populate the list using ArrayList and ArrayAdapter ...upon clicking the items on the list I want to be able to fire an intent containing info about the item clicked ... info like the index number of the item .. using the method : onItemClick(AdapterView av, View v, int index, long arg) I do get index of the item clicked . however it is of the list currently displayed . the problem comes when I do setFilterTextEnabled(true) , and on the app type in some text to to search some item ..and then click it ..rather than giving me the index of the item on the original list it gives me the index on filtered list.. following is the snippet of code: myListView.setOnItemClickListener(new OnItemClickListener() { public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> av, View v, int index, long arg) { Intent lyricsViewIntent = new Intent(iginga.this, LyricsPage.class); lyricsViewIntent.putExtra("title", songList.get((int)arg).getTitle()); lyricsViewIntent.putExtra("id", songList.get((int)arg).getSongId()); startActivity(lyricsViewIntent); } }); myListView.setTextFilterEnabled(true); Is there any way I can get the original index /position of the item instead of the one showing in filtered text ...when filtered.

    Read the article

  • z index background issue in IE

    - by Michael
    I have a jQuery tools scroller set up with controls managing two separate divs of info - one images, the other related text that needs to sit over the top of the images with a transparent bg image. I am using z-indexing to achieve this and am aware of IE's issues with this but am unable to sort it (tested in IE6-8). Image of the issue below: http://test.shakingpaper.com.au/not_working.png It seems that the overlayed div is taking on the containers white. Try as I might, I can't resolve this. HTML/CSS code below: <div id="content"> <div id="nav"></div> <div class="s4 slideshow"> <div> <img src="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_directory'); ?>/images/hero_1_white.jpg" width="770" height="367" /> </div> <div> <img src="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_directory'); ?>/images/hero_1_white.jpg" width="770" height="367" /> </div> <div> <img src="<?php bloginfo('stylesheet_directory'); ?>/images/hero_1_white.jpg" width="770" height="367" /> </div> </div> <div id="overlay_bg"></div> <div class="s4 information"> <div> <h1>Support</h1> <p>Quisque lacus quam, egestas ac tincidunt a, lacinia vel velit. Aenean facilisis nulla vitae.</p> <p><a href="#">Support Us</a></p> </div> <div> <h1>Events</h1> <p>Quisque lacegestas ac tincidunt a, lacinia vel velit. Aenean facilisis nulla vitae.</p> <p><a href="#">Read More</a></p> </div> <div> <h1>Regional</h1> <p>Quisque lacus quam, egestas ac tincidunt a, lacinia vel velit. Aenean facilisis nulla vitae.</p> <p><a href="#">Support Us</a></p> </div> </div> </div> <!-- end of content --> #content { height: auto; min-height: 300px !important; overflow: hidden; position:relative; margin-left: 27px; width: 770px; padding-bottom: 43px; } #nav { width: 60px; z-index: 10000; position: absolute; top:340px; left: 28px; } .s4 { width: 770px; height: 370px; overflow: hidden; } #nav a { background-color: transparent; background-image: url(images/transition.png); background-position: 0 0; text-indent: -1000em; width: 10px; height: 10px; display: block; float: left; margin-right: 5px; } #nav a.activeSlide { background-position: 0 -10px; } #overlay_bg { background: url(images/soild_block.png) no-repeat; width: 318px; height: 339px; z-index: 5000; position: absolute; top: 28px; } .information { position: absolute; top: 60px; left: 28px; z-index: 16000; width: 290px; height: 260px; color: #FFF; } .information h1 { font-size: 50px; font-style: italic; text-transform: uppercase; } .information p { font-size: 17px; line-height: 27px; margin-top: 37px; } .information a { font-size: 13px; padding-bottom: 2px; border-bottom: 1px solid; color: #FFF; text-transform: uppercase; font-style: italic; } .information a:hover { color: #000; } Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Same index for all (sub-)directories?

    - by whatisthis
    Hi. I was wondering if it was possible to write some .htaccess page that makes the server use an index.php file in a SINGLE directory as the index file for every directory/sub-directory on my server, rather than placing the exact same index.php in 200+ directories. If my description isn't clear, what I essentially mean is: /files/index.php is to be used as the index for, for example, /files/morefiles, as well as the index for all directories and sub-directories within /files/, even though those directories would not have an index file themselves. Thanks to all in advance.

    Read the article

  • jQuery RadioButton index

    - by Tomas
    Hello How to get checked RadioButton Index using jQuery? I need to read it and save to cookies to load status later using code $('input[name="compression"]')[{Reading from cookies code}].checked = true; 1<input name="compression" type="radio" value="1" checked="checked" /> 2<input name="compression" type="radio" value="2" /> 3<input name="compression" type="radio" value="3" /> Regards Tomas

    Read the article

  • Why is postgresql update query so slow sometimes, even with index

    - by Matija
    i have a simple update query (foo column type is BOOLEAN (default false)): update tablename set foo = true where id = 234; which "id" is set to (primary) key, and if i run "explain analyze" i got: Index Cond: (id = 234) Total runtime: 0.358 ms but still, i have plenty of unexplained queries at slow log (pgfouine), which took more than 200s (?!): Times executed: 99, Av. duration (s): 70 can anyone please explain, whats the reason for that? (1.5 mio rows in table, postgresql 8.4)

    Read the article

  • setting z-index jquery ui controls?

    - by maxp
    Annoyingly, the jquery ui's set a few css properties inline, making it impossible to override them in the stylesheet. I tried to override the values with jquery, but then they get changed back as soon as the control is interacted with. Does anyone know if any of the jquery ui control's initialisers/constructors have the ability to override their z-index value or set other css properties?

    Read the article

  • jQuery oembed plugin z-index problem

    - by Ben
    I'm using the jQuery oembed plugin to display videos from a Vimeo feed. The only problem is they display over the top of my navigation menu. I have tried setting the z-index of the menu but this makes no difference. A common suggestion seems to be to set the wmode parameter to transparent or opaque. However, passing this as a parameter to the oembed function makes no difference. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Setting clustered index in nhibernate

    - by SolBadguy
    Hi. I'm trying to define a property that is not the id as a clustered index in nhibernate, yet I've found no way of doing this. Could anyone give me a pointer of how this is done, or it is something not currently available in nhibernate? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • MySQL won't use index for query?

    - by Jack Sleight
    I have this table: CREATE TABLE `point` ( `id` INT(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `siteid` INT(11) NOT NULL, `lft` INT(11) DEFAULT NULL, `rgt` INT(11) DEFAULT NULL, `level` SMALLINT(6) DEFAULT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `point_siteid_site_id` (`siteid`), CONSTRAINT `point_siteid_site_id` FOREIGN KEY (`siteid`) REFERENCES `site` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ) ENGINE=INNODB AUTO_INCREMENT=35 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci And this query: SELECT * FROM `point` WHERE siteid = 1; Which results in this EXPLAIN information: +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | point | ALL | point_siteid_site_id | NULL | NULL | NULL | 6 | Using where | +----+-------------+-------+------+----------------------+------+---------+------+------+-------------+ Question is, why isn't the query using the point_siteid_site_id index?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >