Search Results

Search found 757 results on 31 pages for 'muenchian grouping'.

Page 9/31 | < Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >

  • How do I combine grouped nodes?

    - by LOlliffe
    Using the XSL: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" exclude-result-prefixes="xs" version="2.0"> <xsl:output method="xml"/> <xsl:template match="/"> <records> <record> <!-- Group record by bigID, for further processing --> <xsl:for-each-group select="records/record" group-by="bigID"> <xsl:sort select="bigID"/> <xsl:for-each select="current-group()"> <!-- Create new combined record --> <bigID> <!-- <xsl:value-of select="."/> --> <xsl:for-each select="."> <xsl:value-of select="bigID"/> </xsl:for-each> </bigID> <text> <xsl:value-of select="text"/> </text> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:for-each-group> </record> </records> </xsl:template> I'm trying to change: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <records> <record> <bigID>123</bigID> <text>Contains text for 123</text> <bigID>456</bigID> <text>Some 456 text</text> <bigID>123</bigID> <text>More 123 text</text> <bigID>123</bigID> <text>Yet more 123 text</text> </record> into: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <records> <record> <bigID>123</bigID> <text>Contains text for 123</text> <text>More 123 text</text> <text>Yet more 123 text</text> </bigID> <bigID>456 <text>Some 456 text</text> </bigID> </record> Right now, I'm just listing the grouped <bigIDs, individually. I'm missing the step after grouping, where I combine the grouped <bigID nodes. My suspicion is that I need to use the "key" function somehow, but I'm not sure. Thanks for any help.

    Read the article

  • Any e-mail client with additional grouping functionality on Mac OS X?

    - by harald
    Hello, I'm very unhappy with my mail experience. I'm receiving a lot of mails from various clients and projects and need a way to better organize them. I would really love to have additional grouping-functionality with the e-mail client. Currently I'm using Mac OS X's Mail.app, but I am not bound to this. So I am open to any Mail.app-plugin or independent mail application commercial or not for Mac OS X -- should support IMAP, though -- but I think this should not be a problem nowadays? With Mail.app i'm doing the following: group by thread sort by datetime descending What I would love to have is not only additional tagging-functionality for e-mails -- I know, that at least thunderbird and postbox support them. I would love to have some additional grouping functionality for these tags -- inside the main mail window. So maybe I can summarize the important points: "native" Mac OS X mail client (no web-mailer please) automatic-tagging functionality (eg.: auto-apply tags by some kind of filter) easy access to tagged mails Easy access to tagged mails: I would really love to have some additional grouping functionality in the mail folders. The mail application should put all tagged mails in a group -- the groups should be sorted by last received e-mail. Inside the group I would still like to have the possiblity to group by thread. or It would be ok to have a list of tags (topics) on the left pane of the mail client. For example postbox: There is the 'accounts-section', there is the 'folders-section' -- but why is there no 'topics-section'? Thanks very much,

    Read the article

  • regex return conditional group

    - by priyank.mp
    Hi , I spent lot time figuring out a simple regex to return a group (only 1st group). So the string can be - "No purchase required" or "Purchase of $50.00 worth groceries is required." I am trying to write a regex which can parse "No" or "50" based on the given string. This is what I have written. (?:(No) monthly maintenance|Purchase of \$([\d\.]+ worth groceries) This works fine but I want my output as 1st group/group 1 only.

    Read the article

  • C# regex. Optional match after string

    - by Oskar Kjellin
    I have an input like this test1.test2.part01 which I want to strip away to test1.test2. The only thing i know is that it will end with partxx and probably a dot before the partxx. However, it will not always be a apart. Another example of input might be testas1.tlp2.asd3.part10 which ofcourse should be stripped to testas1.tlp2.asd3. I've made all that, no problem. The problem is the dot at the end before partxx. My regex at the moment is: (.*).?part\d{1,2} But it will include the dot in the group. I do not want the dot to be in the group. The below works as I want it, given that the dot exists, but it will not always be there. (.*).part\d{1,2} How can I exclude the optional dot from the group?

    Read the article

  • PHP splitting arrays into groups based on one field's value

    - by Dan
    I have an array containing arrays of names and other details, in alphabetical order. Each array includes the first letter associated with the name. Array ( [0] => Array ( [0] => a [1] => Alanis Morissette ) [1] => Array ( [0] => a [1] => Alesha Dixon ) [2] => Array ( [0] => a [1] => Alexandra Burke ) [3] => Array ( [0] => b [1] => Britney Spears ) [4] => Array ( [0] => b [1] => Bryan Adams ) ) I'd like to display them grouped by that first initial, eg: A - Alanis Morissette Alesha Dixon Alexandra Burke B - Britney Spears Bryan Adams etc... Is this at all possible?

    Read the article

  • LinQ to objects GroupBy() by object and Sum() by amount

    - by Daniil Harik
    Hello, I have pretty simple case which I started solving using foreach(), but then I thought I could do It using Linq Basically I have IList that contains PaymentTransaction objects and there are 2 properties Dealer and Amount I want to GroupBy() by Dealer and Sum() bv amount. I tried to accomplish this using following code, but unfortunately it does not work var test = paymentTransactionDao.GetAll().GroupBy(x => x.Dealer).Sum(x => x.Amount); Want exactly I'm doing wrong here? I'm sorry if this question is too simple. Thank You

    Read the article

  • TestNG's groups

    - by the qwerty
    If we have <include name="web" > and <include name="weekend" >, TestNG runs all the methods that belong to either web or weekend. Is it possible to change this behaviour so TestNG would run all the methods that belong to web and weekend? Does anyone knows a way to accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • Regular Expression Fill-Down

    - by richardtallent
    I have a plain text file something like this: Ford\tTaurus F-150 F-250 Toyota\tCamry Corsica In other words, a two-level hierarchy where the first child is on the same line as the parent, but subsequent children on lines following, distinguished from being a parent by a two-space prefix (\t above represents a literal tab in the text). I need to convert to this using RegEx: Ford\tTaurus Ford\tF-150 Ford\tF-250 Toyota\tCamry Toyota\tCorsica So, I need to capture the parent (text between \r\n and \t not starting with \s\s), and apply that in the middle of any \r\n\s\s found until the next parent. I have a feeling this can be done with some sort of nested groups, but I think I need more caffeine or something, can't seem to work out the pattern. (Using .NET with IgnoreWhitespace off and Multiline off)

    Read the article

  • How to group a serial of objects according to timestamp

    - by Benny
    I have a serial of object defined as: public class Foo { public DateTime Time {get;set;} } now I want to group objects(IEnumerable<Foo>) according to the time, e.g. I want to group them according to hour or day or month. for example (group into hour): group 1(13:00-14:00) : foo1, foo2, foo3 group 2(14:00-15:00): foo4, foo5 How to write LINQ? hope I made myself clear.

    Read the article

  • How to group rules in jquery

    - by Daniele
    Hi I've got a simple question. I've this code below, i use ajax three times in very similiar ways the only things that change are the data passed and the id of the target. Is there a way to group these instructions in a simple one? Thx D. $('#fld_email').focusout(function() { var request_email = $(this).val(); $.ajax({type:"GET", url: "autocomplete.asp", data: "fld=firstname&email="+request_email, beforeSend: function(){$('#fld_firstname').addClass('ac_loading');}, success: function(msg){$('#fld_firstname').val(msg);$('#fld_firstname').removeClass('ac_loading'); } }); $.ajax({type:"GET", url: "autocomplete.asp", data: "fld=lastname&email="+request_email, beforeSend: function(){$('#fld_lastname').addClass('ac_loading');}, success: function(msg){$('#fld_lastname').val(msg);$('#fld_lastname').removeClass('ac_loading');} }); $.ajax({type:"GET", url: "autocomplete.asp", data: "fld=phone&email="+request_email, beforeSend: function(){$('#fld_phone').addClass('ac_loading');}, success: function(msg){$('#fld_phone').val(msg);$('#fld_phone').removeClass('ac_loading');} }); } );

    Read the article

  • How to group files by date using PowerShell?

    - by Shane Cusson
    I have a folder with 2000+ files. I want to count the files by date. so with: Mode LastWriteTime Length Name ---- ------------- ------ ---- -a--- 2010-03-15 12:54 AM 10364953 file1.txt -a--- 2010-03-15 1:07 AM 10650503 file2.txt -a--- 2010-03-16 1:20 AM 10118657 file3.txt -a--- 2010-03-16 1:33 AM 9735542 file4.txt -a--- 2010-03-18 1:46 AM 10666979 file5.txt I'd like to see: Date Count ---------- ------ 2010-03-15 2 2010-03-16 2 2010-03-18 1 Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to select the first row for each group in MySQL?

    - by Jader Dias
    In C# it would be like this: table .GroupBy(row => row.SomeColumn) .Select(group => group .OrderBy(row => row.AnotherColumn) .First() ) Linq-To-Sql translates it to the following T-SQL code: SELECT [t3].[AnotherColumn], [t3].[SomeColumn] FROM ( SELECT [t0].[SomeColumn] FROM [Table] AS [t0] GROUP BY [t0].[SomeColumn] ) AS [t1] OUTER APPLY ( SELECT TOP (1) [t2].[AnotherColumn], [t2].[SomeColumn] FROM [Table] AS [t2] WHERE (([t1].[SomeColumn] IS NULL) AND ([t2].[SomeColumn] IS NULL)) OR (([t1].[SomeColumn] IS NOT NULL) AND ([t2].[SomeColumn] IS NOT NULL) AND ([t1].[SomeColumn] = [t2].[SomeColumn])) ORDER BY [t2].[AnotherColumn] ) AS [t3] ORDER BY [t3].[AnotherColumn] But it is uncompatible with MySQL.

    Read the article

  • Get Max() record from table by group

    - by Garcia Julien
    Hi, i've got a table like that : Article Number Last Voucher Number Last Voucher Date 0557934 519048 04/02/2005 0557934 519067 04/02/2005 0557934 528630 09/29/2005 0557934 528631 09/29/2005 0557934 529374 10/13/2005 0557934 529375 10/13/2005 0557934 529471 10/16/2005 0557934 529472 10/16/2005 0557934 535306 01/08/2006 0557934 535307 01/08/2006 0557934 1106009 08/10/2006 0557934 1106010 08/10/2006 0022738 22554 02/20/1995 0022738 22595 03/12/1995 0022738 22597 03/15/1995 0022738 22605 03/19/1995 0022738 22616 03/25/1995 0022738 22621 03/28/1995 0022738 22630 04/05/1995 I would like to have only the record with the last date : Article Number Last Voucher Number Last Voucher Date 0557934 1106010 08/10/2006 0022738 22630 04/05/1995 I can do directly on SQL or on Linq. Any idea? Ju

    Read the article

  • How do I make a grouped select box grouped by a column for a given model in Formtastic for Rails?

    - by jklina
    In my Rails project I'm using Formtastic to manage my forms. I have a model, Tags, with a column, "group". The group column is just a simple hardcoded way to organize my tags. I will post my Tag model class so you can see how it's organized class Tag < ActiveRecord::Base class Group BRAND = 1 SEASON = 2 OCCASION = 3 CONDITION = 4 SUBCATEGORY = 5 end has_many :taggings, :dependent => :destroy has_many :plaggs, :through => :taggings has_many :monitorings, :as => :monitorizable validates_presence_of :name, :group validates_uniqueness_of :name, :case_sensitive => false def self.brands(options = {}) self.all({ :conditions => { :group => Group::BRAND } }.merge(options)) end def self.seasons(options = {}) self.all({ :conditions => { :group => Group::SEASON } }.merge(options)) end def self.occasions(options = {}) self.all({ :conditions => { :group => Group::OCCASION } }.merge(options)) end def self.conditions(options = {}) self.all({ :conditions => { :group => Group::CONDITION } }.merge(options)) end def self.subcategories(options = {}) self.all({ :conditions => { :group => Group::SUBCATEGORY } }.merge(options)) end def self.non_brands(options = {}) self.all({ :conditions => [ "`group` != ? AND `group` != ?", Tag::Group::SUBCATEGORY, Tag::Group::BRAND] }.merge(options)) end end My goal is to use Formtastic to provide a grouped multiselect box, grouped by the column, "group" with the tags that are returned from the non_brands method. I have tried the following: = f.input :tags, :required => false, :as => :select, :input_html => { :multiple => true }, :collection => tags, :selected => sel_tags, :group_by => :group, :prompt => false But I receive the following error: (undefined method `klass' for nil:NilClass) Any ideas where I'm going wrong? Thanks for looking :]

    Read the article

  • LINQ to group objects according to timestamp

    - by Benny
    I have a serial of object defined as: public class Foo { public DateTime Time {get;set;} } now I want to group objects(IEnumerable<Foo>) according to the time, e.g. I want to group them according to hour or day or month. for example (group into hour): group 1(13:00-14:00) : foo1, foo2, foo3 group 2(14:00-15:00): foo4, foo5 How to write LINQ over this? hope I made myself clear.

    Read the article

  • XSLT: generate multiple object by incrementing attribute and value

    - by Daniel
    Hi, I have a xml as below that I'd like to copy n times while incrementing one of its element and one of its attribute. XML input: <Person position=1> <name>John</name> <number>1</number> <number>1</number> </Person> and I'd like something like below with the number of increment to be a variable. XML output: <Person position=1> <name>John</name> <number>1</number> </Person> <Person position=2> <name>John</name> <number>2</number> </Person> .... <Person position=n> <name>John</name> <number>n</number> </Person> Any clue

    Read the article

  • IGrouping and Casting in Linq

    - by FiveTools
    I have the following query: var groupCats = from g in groups group g by g.Value into grouped select new { GroupCategory = grouped.Key, Categories = GetCategories(grouped.Key, child) }; This works fine. In the anonymous type returned GroupCategory is a string, and Categories are an Enumerable - what is the proper way to declare this instead of using 'var'? I tried: IGrouping<string,string> groupCats = from g in groups group g by g.Value into grouped select new { GroupCategory = grouped.Key, Categories = GetCategories(grouped.Key, child) }; and IGrouping<string,Enumerable<string>> groupCats = from g in groups group g by g.Value into grouped select new { GroupCategory = grouped.Key, Categories = GetCategories(grouped.Key, child) }; In both instances I get: Cannot implicity convert type....An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast) How do I cast this?

    Read the article

  • how to apply group by on xslt elements

    - by Amit
    Hello All, I need to group the value based on some attribute and populate it. below mentioned is i/p xml and if you see there are 4 rows for Users and for id 2,4 Division is same i.e. HR while generating actual o/p I need to group by Division ... Any help ??? I/P XML <Users> <User id="2" name="ABC" Division="HR"/> <User id="3" name="xyz" Division="Admin"/> <User id="4" name="LMN" Division="Payroll"/> <User id="5" name="PQR" Division="HR"/> </Users> expected Result: I need to group the values based on Division and populate i.e. <AllUsers> <Division value="HR"> <User> <id>2</id> <name>ABC</name> </User> <User> <id>5</id> <name>PQR</name> </User> </Division> <Division value="ADMIN"> <User> <id>3</id> <name>XYZ</name> </User> </Division> <Division value="Payroll"> <User> <id>4</id> <name>LMN</name> </User> </Division> </AllUsers>

    Read the article

  • Eliminating matching values in a SQL result set

    - by Burgess Taylor
    I have a table with a list of transactions (invoices and credits) and I need to get a list of all the rows where the invoices and credits don't match up. eg user product value bill ThingA 200 jim ThingA -200 sue ThingB 100 liz ThingC 50 I only want to see the third and fourth rows, as the values of the others match off. I can do this if I select product, sum(value) ... group by product having sum(value) < 0 which works well, but I want to return the user name as well. As soon as I add the user to the select, I need to group by it as well, which messes it up as the amounts don't match up by user AND product. Any ideas ? I am using MS SQL 2000... Cheers

    Read the article

  • MYSQ request | GROUP BY DAY

    - by user889349
    I have a table: orders, and need to make a request and get other table. My DB table: id close 1 2012-05-29 03:11:15 2 2012-05-30 03:11:40 3 2012-05-31 03:12:10 4 2012-05-31 03:14:13 5 2012-05-31 03:16:50 6 2012-05-31 03:40:07 7 2012-05-31 05:22:18 8 2012-05-31 05:22:22 9 2012-05-31 05:22:50 ... I need to make a request and get this table (GROUP BY DAY(close)): 1 2012-05-29 03:11:15 2 2012-05-30 03:11:40 9 2012-05-31 05:22:50 /*This is a last record on this day (05-31)*/ Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Organizing a random list of objects in Python.

    - by Saebin
    So I have a list that I want to convert to a list that contains a list for each group of objects. ie ['objA.attr1', 'objC', 'objA.attr55', 'objB.attr4'] would return [['objA.attr1', 'objA.attr55'], ['objC'], ['objB.attr4']] currently this is what I use: givenList = ['a.attr1', 'b', 'a.attr55', 'c.attr4'] trgList = [] objNames = [] for val in givenList: obj = val.split('.')[0] if obj in objNames: id = objNames.index(obj) trgList[id].append(val) else: objNames.append(obj) trgList.append([val]) #print trgList It seems to run a decent speed when the original list has around 100,000 ids... but I am curious if there is a better way to do this. Order of the objects or attributes does not matter. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Adding two buttons next to an ExtJS ComboBox

    - by Giku Promitt
    Hi. I need to place an Add button and a Remove button next to an ExtJS ComboBox. It's critical for these three elements to be in a single line because I have to apply this to all other ComboBoxes in the fieldset too. Please notice that the given ComboBoxes are items of a fieldset. Replacing the buttons with context menu items is not the desired solution. Can you give me some ideas? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How do I select and group by a portion of a string?

    - by Russ Bradberry
    Given I have data like the following, how can I select and group by portions of a string? Version Users 1.1.1 1 1.1.23 3 1.1.45 1 2.1.24 3 2.1.12 1 2.1.45 3 3.1.10 1 3.1.23 3 What I want is to sum up the users using version 1.1.x and 2.2.x and 3.3.x etc, but I'm not sure how I can group on a partial string in a select statement. edit What the data should return like is this: Version Users 1.1.XX 5 2.1.XX 7 3.1.XX 4 There is an infinite variable number of versions, some are in this format (major, minor, build) some are just major, minor and some are just major, the only time I want to "roll up" the versions is when there is a build.

    Read the article

  • Finding a users maximum score and the associated details

    - by VolatileStorm
    I have a table in which users store scores and other information about said score (for example notes on score, or time taken etc). I want a mysql query that finds each users personal best score and it's associated notes and time etc. What I have tried to use is something like this: SELECT *, MAX(score) FROM table GROUP BY (user) The problem with this is that whilst you can extra the users personal best from that query [MAX(score)], the returned notes and times etc are not associated with the maximum score, but a different score (specifically the one contained in *). Is there a way I can write a query that selects what I want? Or will I have to do it manually in PhP?

    Read the article

  • How to capture strings using * or ? with groups in python regular expressions

    - by user1334085
    When the regular expression has a capturing group followed by "*" or "?", there is no value captured. Instead if you use "+" for the same string, you can see the capture. I need to be able to capture the same value using "?" >>> str1='This string has 29 characters' >>> re.search(r'(\d+)*', str1).group(0) '' >>> re.search(r'(\d+)*', str1).group(1) >>> >>> re.search(r'(\d+)+', str1).group(0) '29' >>> re.search(r'(\d+)+', str1).group(1) '29' More specific question is added below for clarity: I have str1 and str2 below, and I want to use just one regexp which will match both. In case of str1, I also want to be able to capture the number of QSFP ports >>> str1='''4 48 48-port and 6 QSFP 10GigE Linecard 7548S-LC''' >>> str2='''4 48 48-port 10GigE Linecard 7548S-LC''' >>> When I do not use a metacharacter, the capture works: >>> re.search(r'^4\s+48\s+.*(?:(\d+)\s+QSFP).*-LC', str1, re.I|re.M).group(1) '6' >>> It works even when I use the "+" to indicate one occurrence: >>> re.search(r'^4\s+48\s+.*(?:(\d+)\s+QSFP)+.*-LC', str1, re.I|re.M).group(1) '6' >>> But when I use "?" to match for 0 or 1 occurrence, the capture fails even for str1: >>> re.search(r'^4\s+48\s+.*(?:(\d+)\s+QSFP)?.*-LC', str1, re.I|re.M).group(1) >>>

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  | Next Page >