Search Results

Search found 3456 results on 139 pages for 'vector art'.

Page 90/139 | < Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >

  • gmail drawing send

    - by siran
    is there some online web app which would let me make a vector drawing, and give me the choice to write some text and send it through gmail ? for the magic to be complete, the web app would save my drawing as png (or whatever) and attach it to the sent email... i guess i would have to give the webapp my gmail account info so it can send it from my account...

    Read the article

  • C++ Virtual Constructor, without clone()

    - by Julien L.
    I want to perform "deep copies" of an STL container of pointers to polymorphic classes. I know about the Prototype design pattern, implemented by means of the Virtual Ctor Idiom, as explained in the C++ FAQ Lite, Item 20.8. It is simple and straightforward: struct ABC // Abstract Base Class { virtual ~ABC() {} virtual ABC * clone() = 0; }; struct D1 : public ABC { virtual D1 * clone() { return new D1( *this ); } // Covariant Return Type }; A deep copy is then: for( i = 0; i < oldVector.size(); ++i ) newVector.push_back( oldVector[i]->clone() ); Drawbacks As Andrei Alexandrescu states it: The clone() implementation must follow the same pattern in all derived classes; in spite of its repetitive structure, there is no reasonable way to automate defining the clone() member function (beyond macros, that is). Moreover, clients of ABC can possibly do something bad. (I mean, nothing prevents clients to do something bad, so, it will happen.) Better design? My question is: is there another way to make an abstract base class clonable without requiring derived classes to write clone-related code? (Helper class? Templates?) Following is my context. Hopefully, it will help understanding my question. I am designing a class hierarchy to perform operations on a class Image: struct ImgOp { virtual ~ImgOp() {} bool run( Image & ) = 0; }; Image operations are user-defined: clients of the class hierarchy will implement their own classes derived from ImgOp: struct CheckImageSize : public ImgOp { std::size_t w, h; bool run( Image &i ) { return w==i.width() && h==i.height(); } }; struct CheckImageResolution; struct RotateImage; ... Multiple operations can be performed sequentially on an image: bool do_operations( std::vector< ImgOp* > v, Image &i ) { std::for_each( v.begin(), v.end(), /* bind2nd(mem_fun(&ImgOp::run), i ...) don't remember syntax */ ); } int main( ... ) { std::vector< ImgOp* > v; v.push_back( new CheckImageSize ); v.push_back( new CheckImageResolution ); v.push_back( new RotateImage ); Image i; do_operations( v, i ); } If there are multiple images, the set can be split and shared over several threads. To ensure "thread-safety", each thread must have its own copy of all operation objects contained in v -- v becomes a prototype to be deep copied in each thread.

    Read the article

  • OpenCV application, moving from 32bits OS to 64 bits, any known issues ?

    - by Spredzy
    Hi all, I was developing an C++ application using OpenCV2.0 under Windows 32bits OS, I recently moved to a Windows 64 bits OS and now it's not working anymore. Compilation does not recognize the *.lib set in the project properties Then when I change their name - what I think I should not be supposed to do - It crashed at my first assignment : Vector.push_back(tmp) Does anyone has an idea ?

    Read the article

  • A* algorithm works OK, but not perfectly. What's wrong?

    - by Bart van Heukelom
    This is my grid of nodes: I'm moving an object around on it using the A* pathfinding algorithm. It generally works OK, but it sometimes acts wrongly: When moving from 3 to 1, it correctly goes via 2. When going from 1 to 3 however, it goes via 4. When moving between 3 and 5, it goes via 4 in either direction instead of the shorter way via 6 What can be wrong? Here's my code (AS3): public static function getPath(from:Point, to:Point, grid:NodeGrid):PointLine { // get target node var target:NodeGridNode = grid.getClosestNodeObj(to.x, to.y); var backtrace:Map = new Map(); var openList:LinkedSet = new LinkedSet(); var closedList:LinkedSet = new LinkedSet(); // begin with first node openList.add(grid.getClosestNodeObj(from.x, from.y)); // start A* var curNode:NodeGridNode; while (openList.size != 0) { // pick a new current node if (openList.size == 1) { curNode = NodeGridNode(openList.first); } else { // find cheapest node in open list var minScore:Number = Number.MAX_VALUE; var minNext:NodeGridNode; openList.iterate(function(next:NodeGridNode, i:int):int { var score:Number = curNode.distanceTo(next) + next.distanceTo(target); if (score < minScore) { minScore = score; minNext = next; return LinkedSet.BREAK; } return 0; }); curNode = minNext; } // have not reached if (curNode == target) break; else { // move to closed openList.remove(curNode); closedList.add(curNode); // put connected nodes on open list for each (var adjNode:NodeGridNode in curNode.connects) { if (!openList.contains(adjNode) && !closedList.contains(adjNode)) { openList.add(adjNode); backtrace.put(adjNode, curNode); } } } } // make path var pathPoints:Vector.<Point> = new Vector.<Point>(); pathPoints.push(to); while(curNode != null) { pathPoints.unshift(curNode.location); curNode = backtrace.read(curNode); } pathPoints.unshift(from); return new PointLine(pathPoints); } NodeGridNode::distanceTo() public function distanceTo(o:NodeGridNode):Number { var dx:Number = location.x - o.location.x; var dy:Number = location.y - o.location.y; return Math.sqrt(dx*dx + dy*dy); }

    Read the article

  • what is common GIS method?

    - by smile
    hello every one I want to know what is the main methods that used in GIS to connect between the location and their information (spatial access methodes) SAM. I read in some web sites two methods are: vector raster is that methods related what I want??? thank you ^_^

    Read the article

  • How to save svg canvas to local filesystem

    - by dr jerry
    Is there a way to allow a user, after he has created a vector graph on a javascript svg canvas using a browser, to download this file to their local filesystem? SVG is a total new field for me so please be patient if my wording is not accurate. kind regards, Jeroen.

    Read the article

  • Multi-threaded Pooled Allocators

    - by Darren Engwirda
    I'm having some issues using pooled memory allocators for std::list objects in a multi-threaded application. The part of the code I'm concerned with runs each thread function in isolation (i.e. there is no communication or synchronization between threads) and therefore I'd like to setup separate memory pools for each thread, where each pool is not thread-safe (and hence fast). I've tried using a shared thread-safe singleton memory pool and found the performance to be poor, as expected. This is a heavily simplified version of the type of thing I'm trying to do. A lot has been included in a pseudo-code kind of way, sorry if it's confusing. /* The thread functor - one instance of MAKE_QUADTREE created for each thread */ class make_quadtree { private: /* A non-thread-safe memory pool for int linked list items, let's say that it's * something along the lines of BOOST::OBJECT_POOL */ pooled_allocator<int> item_pool; /* The problem! - a local class that would be constructed within each std::list as the * allocator but really just delegates to ITEM_POOL */ class local_alloc { public : //!! I understand that I can't access ITEM_POOL from within a nested class like //!! this, that's really my question - can I get something along these lines to //!! work?? pointer allocate (size_t n) { return ( item_pool.allocate(n) ); } }; public : make_quadtree (): item_pool() // only construct 1 instance of ITEM_POOL per // MAKE_QUADTREE object { /* The kind of data structures - vectors of linked lists * The idea is that all of the linked lists should share a local pooled allocator */ std::vector<std::list<int, local_alloc>> lists; /* The actual operations - too complicated to show, but in general: * * - The vector LISTS is grown as a quadtree is built, it's size is the number of * quadtree "boxes" * * - Each element of LISTS (each linked list) represents the ID's of items * contained within each quadtree box (say they're xy points), as the quadtree * is grown a lot of ID pop/push-ing between lists occurs, hence the memory pool * is important for performance */ } }; So really my problem is that I'd like to have one memory pool instance per thread functor instance, but within each thread functor share the pool between multiple std::list objects.

    Read the article

  • Core Location and speed measurements

    - by Krumelur
    Does anyone know if Core Location in the iPhone OS uses anything but simple vector math to calculate speed? I've read that the GPS system can provide speed measurements that can be accurate when position is not (I believe using the Doppler shifts of the signals). I've tried and failed to see if the iPhone does this. The question is basically, does this data contain information or is it just convenience functions, using (filtered?) location data?

    Read the article

  • Translating C++'s sprintf format string to C#'s string.Format

    - by thebackup
    I found the following C++ code (comments added myself): // frame_name is a char array // prefix is std::string // k is a for loop counter // frames is a std::vector string sprintf(frameName, "%s_%0*s.bmp", prefix.c_str(), k, frames[k].c_str()); I then try to translate it to C# // prefix is string // k is a for loop counter // frames is List<string> string frameName = string.Format("{0}_(what goes in here?).bmp", prefix, k, frames[k]); Basically, what would be the C# equivalent of the C++ format string "%s_%0*s.bmp"?

    Read the article

  • How are iterators and pointers related?

    - by sharptooth
    Code with iterators looks pretty much like code with pointers. Iterators are of some obscure type (like std::vector<int>::iterator for example). What I don't get is how iterators and pointer are related to each other - is an iterator a wrapper around a pointer with overloaded operations to advance to adjacent elements or is it something else?

    Read the article

  • Map entries become vectors when piped thru a macro

    - by Gavin Grover
    In Clojure, a map entry created within a macro is preserved... (class (eval `(new clojure.lang.MapEntry :a 7))) ;=> clojure.lang.MapEntry ...but when piped thru from the outside context collapses to a vector... (class (eval `~(new clojure.lang.MapEntry :a 7))) ;=> clojure.lang.PersistentVector This behavior is defined inside LispReader.syntaxQuote(Object form) condition if(form instanceof IPersistentCollection). Does anyone know if this is intended behavior or something that will be fixed?

    Read the article

  • how to use summation in matlab???

    - by lucky
    i have a randomly generated vector say A of length M say A=rand(M,1) and also i have function X(k)=sin(2*pi*k) how would i find Y(k) which is summation of A(l)*X(k-l) as l goes from 0 to M ... assume any value of k... but answer should be summation of all M+1 terms

    Read the article

  • R: preventing unlist to drop NULL values

    - by nico
    I'm running into a strange problem. I have a vector of lists and I use unlist on them. Some of the elements in the vectors are NULL and unlist seems to be dropping them. How can I prevent this? Here's a simple (non) working example showing this unwanted feature of unlist a = c(list("p1"=2, "p2"=5), list("p1"=3, "p2"=4), list("p1"=NULL, "p2"=NULL), list("p1"=4, "p2"=5)) unlist(a) p1 p2 p1 p2 p1 p2 2 5 3 4 4 5

    Read the article

  • C++ game designing & polymorphism question

    - by Kotti
    Hi! I'm trying to implement some sort of 'just-for-me' game engine and the problem's plot goes the following way: Suppose I have some abstract interface for a renderable entity, e.g. IRenderable. And it's declared the following way: interface IRenderable { // (...) // Suppose that Backend is some abstract backend used // for rendering, and it's implementation is not important virtual void Render(Backend& backend) = 0; }; What I'm doing right now is something like declaring different classes like class Ball : public IRenderable { virtual void Render(Backend& backend) { // Rendering implementation, that is specific for // the Ball object // (...) } }; And then everything looks fine. I can easily do something like std::vector<IRenderable*> items, push some items like new Ball() in this vector and then make a call similiar to foreach (IRenderable* in items) { item->Render(backend); } Ok, I guess it is the 'polymorphic' way, but what if I want to have different types of objects in my game and an ability to manipulate their state, where every object can be manipulated via it's own interface? I could do something like struct GameState { Ball ball; Bonus bonus; // (...) }; and then easily change objects state via their own methods, like ball.Move(...) or bonus.Activate(...), where Move(...) is specific for only Ball and Activate(...) - for only Bonus instances. But in this case I lose the opportunity to write foreach IRenderable* simply because I store these balls and bonuses as instances of their derived, not base classes. And in this case the rendering procedure turns into a mess like ball.Render(backend); bonus.Render(backend); // (...) and it is bad because we actually lose our polymorphism this way (no actual need for making Render function virtual, etc. The other approach means invoking downcasting via dynamic_cast or something with typeid to determine the type of object you want to manipulate and this looks even worse to me and this also breaks this 'polymorphic' idea. So, my question is - is there some kind of (probably) alternative approach to what I want to do or can my current pattern be somehow modified so that I would actually store IRenderable* for my game objects (so that I can invoke virtual Render method on each of them) while preserving the ability to easily change the state of these objects? Maybe I'm doing something absolutely wrong from the beginning, if so, please point it out :) Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Matlab code works with one version but not the other

    - by user1325655
    I have a code that works in Matlab version R2010a but shows errors in matlab R2008a. I am trying to implement a self organizing fuzzy neural network with extended kalman filter. I have the code running but it only works in matlab version R2010a. It doesn't work with other versions. Any help? Code attach function [ c, sigma , W_output ] = SOFNN( X, d, Kd ) %SOFNN Self-Organizing Fuzzy Neural Networks %Input Parameters % X(r,n) - rth traning data from nth observation % d(n) - the desired output of the network (must be a row vector) % Kd(r) - predefined distance threshold for the rth input %Output Parameters % c(IndexInputVariable,IndexNeuron) % sigma(IndexInputVariable,IndexNeuron) % W_output is a vector %Setting up Parameters for SOFNN SigmaZero=4; delta=0.12; threshold=0.1354; k_sigma=1.12; %For more accurate results uncomment the following %format long; %Implementation of a SOFNN model [size_R,size_N]=size(X); %size_R - the number of input variables c=[]; sigma=[]; W_output=[]; u=0; % the number of neurons in the structure Q=[]; O=[]; Psi=[]; for n=1:size_N x=X(:,n); if u==0 % No neuron in the structure? c=x; sigma=SigmaZero*ones(size_R,1); u=1; Psi=GetMePsi(X,c,sigma); [Q,O] = UpdateStructure(X,Psi,d); pT_n=GetMeGreatPsi(x,Psi(n,:))'; else [Q,O,pT_n] = UpdateStructureRecursively(X,Psi,Q,O,d,n); end; KeepSpinning=true; while KeepSpinning %Calculate the error and if-part criteria ae=abs(d(n)-pT_n*O); %approximation error [phi,~]=GetMePhi(x,c,sigma); [maxphi,maxindex]=max(phi); % maxindex refers to the neuron's index if ae>delta if maxphi<threshold %enlarge width [minsigma,minindex]=min(sigma(:,maxindex)); sigma(minindex,maxindex)=k_sigma*minsigma; Psi=GetMePsi(X,c,sigma); [Q,O] = UpdateStructure(X,Psi,d); pT_n=GetMeGreatPsi(x,Psi(n,:))'; else %Add a new neuron and update structure ctemp=[]; sigmatemp=[]; dist=0; for r=1:size_R dist=abs(x(r)-c(r,1)); distIndex=1; for j=2:u if abs(x(r)-c(r,j))<dist distIndex=j; dist=abs(x(r)-c(r,j)); end; end; if dist<=Kd(r) ctemp=[ctemp; c(r,distIndex)]; sigmatemp=[sigmatemp ; sigma(r,distIndex)]; else ctemp=[ctemp; x(r)]; sigmatemp=[sigmatemp ; dist]; end; end; c=[c ctemp]; sigma=[sigma sigmatemp]; Psi=GetMePsi(X,c,sigma); [Q,O] = UpdateStructure(X,Psi,d); KeepSpinning=false; u=u+1; end; else if maxphi<threshold %enlarge width [minsigma,minindex]=min(sigma(:,maxindex)); sigma(minindex,maxindex)=k_sigma*minsigma; Psi=GetMePsi(X,c,sigma); [Q,O] = UpdateStructure(X,Psi,d); pT_n=GetMeGreatPsi(x,Psi(n,:))'; else %Do nothing and exit the while KeepSpinning=false; end; end; end; end; W_output=O; end function [Q_next, O_next,pT_n] = UpdateStructureRecursively(X,Psi,Q,O,d,n) %O=O(t-1) O_next=O(t) p_n=GetMeGreatPsi(X(:,n),Psi(n,:)); pT_n=p_n'; ee=abs(d(n)-pT_n*O); %|e(t)| temp=1+pT_n*Q*p_n; ae=abs(ee/temp); if ee>=ae L=Q*p_n*(temp)^(-1); Q_next=(eye(length(Q))-L*pT_n)*Q; O_next=O + L*ee; else Q_next=eye(length(Q))*Q; O_next=O; end; end function [ Q , O ] = UpdateStructure(X,Psi,d) GreatPsiBig = GetMeGreatPsi(X,Psi); %M=u*(r+1) %n - the number of observations [M,~]=size(GreatPsiBig); %Others Ways of getting Q=[P^T(t)*P(t)]^-1 %************************************************************************** %opts.SYM = true; %Q = linsolve(GreatPsiBig*GreatPsiBig',eye(M),opts); % %Q = inv(GreatPsiBig*GreatPsiBig'); %Q = pinv(GreatPsiBig*GreatPsiBig'); %************************************************************************** Y=GreatPsiBig\eye(M); Q=GreatPsiBig'\Y; O=Q*GreatPsiBig*d'; end %This function works too with x % (X=X and Psi is a Matrix) - Gets you the whole GreatPsi % (X=x and Psi is the row related to x) - Gets you just the column related with the observation function [GreatPsi] = GetMeGreatPsi(X,Psi) %Psi - In a row you go through the neurons and in a column you go through number of %observations **** Psi(#obs,IndexNeuron) **** GreatPsi=[]; [N,U]=size(Psi); for n=1:N x=X(:,n); GreatPsiCol=[]; for u=1:U GreatPsiCol=[ GreatPsiCol ; Psi(n,u)*[1; x] ]; end; GreatPsi=[GreatPsi GreatPsiCol]; end; end function [phi, SumPhi]=GetMePhi(x,c,sigma) [r,u]=size(c); %u - the number of neurons in the structure %r - the number of input variables phi=[]; SumPhi=0; for j=1:u % moving through the neurons S=0; for i=1:r % moving through the input variables S = S + ((x(i) - c(i,j))^2) / (2*sigma(i,j)^2); end; phi = [phi exp(-S)]; SumPhi = SumPhi + phi(j); %phi(u)=exp(-S) end; end %This function works too with x, it will give you the row related to x function [Psi] = GetMePsi(X,c,sigma) [~,u]=size(c); [~,size_N]=size(X); %u - the number of neurons in the structure %size_N - the number of observations Psi=[]; for n=1:size_N [phi, SumPhi]=GetMePhi(X(:,n),c,sigma); PsiTemp=[]; for j=1:u %PsiTemp is a row vector ex: [1 2 3] PsiTemp(j)=phi(j)/SumPhi; end; Psi=[Psi; PsiTemp]; %Psi - In a row you go through the neurons and in a column you go through number of %observations **** Psi(#obs,IndexNeuron) **** end; end

    Read the article

  • The internal implementation of R's dataset

    - by Yin Zhu
    I am trying to build a data processing program. Currently I use a double matrix to represent the data table, each row is an instance, each column represents a feature. I also have an extra vector as the target value for each instance, it is of double type for regression, it is of integer for classification. I want to make it more general. I am wondering how what kind of structure R uses to store a dataset, i.e. the internal implementation in R.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97  | Next Page >