Search Results

Search found 61449 results on 2458 pages for 'base class library'.

Page 94/2458 | < Previous Page | 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101  | Next Page >

  • How to "escape" the JavaScript class keyword to specify a CSS class value.

    - by Robert Claypool
    C# allows a reserved word to be used as a property name via the ampersand. e.g. // In ASP.NET MVC, we use @class to define // the css class attribute for some HtmlHelper methods. var htmlObject = new { readonly = "readonly", @class = "ui-state-highlight" } I want to do the same in JavaScript. e.g. function makeGrid(grid, pager) { grid.jqGrid({ caption: 'Configurations', colNames: ['Id', 'Name'], colModel: [ { name: 'Id', index: 'Id' }, { name: 'Name', index: 'Name', editable: true, editoptions: { readonly: 'readonly', class: 'FormElement readonly' } }, ], pager: pager, url: 'www.example.com/app/configurations") %>', editurl: 'www.example.com/app/configurations/edit") %>' }).navGrid(pager, { edit: true, add: false, del: false, search: false }, {}, {}, {}); } Note class: 'FormElement readonly' is supposed to set the css class value on jqGrid's edit dialog, but IE errors out on the reserved word. Is there an escape character in JavaScript too? #class? @class? &class? Otherwise, how might I tell jqGrid to set the css class on the popup editor? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • wpf keep base style in custom control

    - by Archana R
    Hello, I have created a custom button as i wanted an image and a text inside it as follows: <Style TargetType="{x:Type Local:ImageButton}"> <Setter Property="Template"> <Setter.Value> <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type Local:ImageButton}"> <StackPanel Height="Auto" Orientation="Horizontal"> <Image Margin="0,0,3,0" Source="{TemplateBinding ImageSource}"/> <TextBlock Text="{TemplateBinding Content}" /> </StackPanel> </ControlTemplate> </Setter.Value> </Setter> </Style> Here, ImageButton is a class which inherits from Button class and has ImageSource as a dependency property. But i want to keep the look and feel of the original button. How can i do it? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Scala - Enumeration vs. Case-Classes

    - by tzofia
    I've created akka actor called LogActor. The LogActors's receive method handling messages from other actors and logging them to the specified log level. I can distinguish between the different levels in 2 ways. The first one: import LogLevel._ object LogLevel extends Enumeration { type LogLevel = Value val Error, Warning, Info, Debug = Value } case class LogMessage(level : LogLevel, msg : String) The second: (EDIT) abstract class LogMessage(msg : String) case class LogMessageError(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) case class LogMessageWarning(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) case class LogMessageInfo(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) case class LogMessageDebug(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) Which way is more efficient? does it take less time to match case class or to match enum value? (I read this question but there isn't any answer referring to the runtime issue)

    Read the article

  • Passing Interface Class as a Parameter in Java

    - by aleclerc
    I have an interface: public interface IMech { } and a class that implements it public class Email implements IMech { } and a third class that has this method implemented: public void sendNotification( Class< IMech > mechanism ){ } now I'm trying to call that method like so foo.sendNotification(Email.class); but i keep getting an exception saying: The method sendNotification(Class<IMechanism>) in the type RemediationOperator is not applicable for the arguments (Class<EmailNotification>) Shouldn't this work if it interfaces that class?

    Read the article

  • Singleton class issue in Qt

    - by sijith
    i created a singleton class and trying to access that class in other class but getting error "cannot access private member" Setupconfig is my singleton class and i am trying to access this class in other class which have QMainWindow Error 'Setupconfig::Setupconfig' : cannot access private member declared in class 'Setupconfig' ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Setupconfig.h static Setupconfig *buiderObj() { static Setupconfig *_setupObj= new Setupconfig(); return _setupObj; } private: Setupconfig(); ////////////////////////////////////// EasyBudget.h class EasyBudget : public QMainWindow, public Ui::EasyBudgetClass, public Setupconfig { Q_OBJECT public: Setupconfig *setupObj; } ////////////////////////////////////// EasyBudget.cpp EasyBudget::EasyBudget(QWidget *parent, Qt::WFlags flags) : QMainWindow(parent,Qt::FramelessWindowHint) { setupObj=Setupconfig::buiderObj(); }

    Read the article

  • PHP Nested classes work... sort of?

    - by SeanJA
    So, if you try to do a nested class like this: //nestedtest.php class nestedTest{ function test(){ class E extends Exception{} throw new E; } } You will get an error Fatal error: Class declarations may not be nested in [...] but if you have a class in a separate file like so: //nestedtest2.php class nestedTest2{ function test(){ include('e.php'); throw new E; } } //e.php class E Extends Exception{} So, why does the second hacky way of doing it work, but the non-hacky way of doing it does not work?

    Read the article

  • Loop append div and repeat

    - by Diego Vieira
    I have this code <div class="round-3-top"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> <div class="round-3-bottom"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> But i want generate dynamically, how i do that? Ex.: i have 4 rounds, this would be the generated code <div class="round-4-top"> <div class="round-3-top"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> <div class="round-3-bottom"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="round-4-bottom"> <div class="round-3-top"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> <div class="round-3-bottom"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> </div> I try using TagBuilder in MVC C# but I can not do. What should happen is, if you are 3 rounds, adding he should go inside each div is like the example above. Any idea how can I develop it?

    Read the article

  • Adding active class in menu only works on first page

    - by rileychuggins
    I have nav links that become active once they come into the window. I need to implement this on three separate pages on my website but the following scripts only work for the first page. var services_refresh = function () { // do stuff console.log('Stopped Scrolling'); if($('#ct_scans.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#ct_scans"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#xray.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#xray"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#fluoroscopy.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#fluoroscopy"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#mri.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#mri"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#neuroimaging.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#neuroimaging"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#nuclear_medicine.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#nuclear_medicine"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#ultrasound.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#ultrasound"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#mammography.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#mammography"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#breast_ultrasound.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#breast_ultrasound"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#breast_biopsy.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#breast_biopsy"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#breast_mri.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#breast_mri"]').addClass('active'); } else if($('#osteoporosis.anchor').visible()) { $('#our_services_sub_sections li a').removeClass('active'); $('#our_services_sub_sections li a[href="#osteoporosis"]').addClass('active'); } }; Here is my HTML for the first page that works: <ul id="our_services_sub_sections" class="diagnostic_images"> <li><a class="scroll active" href="#ct_scans">CT Scans</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#xray">X-Ray</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#fluoroscopy">Fluoroscopy</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#mri">MRI</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#neuroimaging">Neuroimaging</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#nuclear_medicine">Nuclear Medicine</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#ultrasound">Ultrasound</a></li> </ul> Here is my HTML for the second page which does not work: <ul id="our_services_sub_sections" class="womens_imaging"> <li><a class="scroll active" href="#mammography">Mammography</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#breast_ultrasound">Breast Ultrasound</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#breast_biopsy">Breast Biopsy</a></li> <li><a class="scroll" href="#breast_mri">Breast MRI</a></li> <li><a class="scroll osteo" href="#osteoporosis">Osteoporosis<br />Evaluation (DEXA)</a></li> </ul> Why is this not working?

    Read the article

  • the error "invalid literal for int() with base 10:" keeps coming up

    - by ratce003
    I'm trying to write a very simple program, I want to print out the sum of all the multiples of 3 and 5 below 100, but, an error keeps accuring, saying "invalid literal for int() with base 10:" my program is as follows: sum = "" sum_int = int(sum) for i in range(1, 101): if i % 5 == 0: sum += i elif i % 3 == 0: sum += i else: sum += "" print sum Any help would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Nested class with hidden constructor impossible in c#?

    - by luckyluke
    I' ve been doing some programming lately and faced an issue which i found weird in c#. (at least for me) public class Foo { //whatever public class FooSpecificCollection : List<Bar> { //implementation details } public FooSpecificCollection GetFoosStuff() { //return the collection } } I want the consumer of Foo to be able to obtain a reference to FooSpecificCollection, even perform some operations on it. Maybe even set it to some other property of Foo or smth like that, but not To be able to CREATE an instance of this class. (the only class that should be able to instatiate this collection should be Foo. Is my request really that far-fetched? I know that people way smarter defined c# but shouldn't there be such an option that a parent class can create a nested class instance but nobody else can't. So far I created a solution to make an abstract class, or interface available through the property and implement a concrete private class that is not available anywhere else. Is this a correct way to handle such a situation.?

    Read the article

  • polymorphism pass instantiated base to deriver

    - by Eric
    I was wondering how to do this, consider the following classes public class Fruit { public string Name { get; set; } public Color Color { get; set; } } public class Apple : Fruit { public Apple() { } } How can I instantiate a new fruit but upcast to Apple, is there a way to instantiate a bunch of Fruit and make them apples with the name & color set. Do I need to manually deep copy? Of course this fails Fruit a = new Fruit(); a.Name = "FirstApple"; a.Color = Color.Red; Apple wa = a as Apple; System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print("Apple name: " + wa.Name); Do I need to pass in a Fruit to the AppleCTor and manually set the name and color( or 1-n properties) Is there an better design to do this?

    Read the article

  • Boost::Container::Vector with Enum Template Argument - Not Legal Base Class

    - by CuppM
    Hi, I'm using Visual Studio 2008 with the Boost v1.42.0 library. If I use an enum as the template argument, I get a compile error when adding a value using push_back(). The compiler error is: 'T': is not a legal base class and the location of the error is move.hpp line 79. #include <boost/interprocess/containers/vector.hpp> class Test { public: enum Types { Unknown = 0, First = 1, Second = 2, Third = 3 }; typedef boost::container::vector<Types> TypesVector; }; int main() { Test::TypesVector o; o.push_back(Test::First); return 0; } If I use a std::vector instead it works. And if I resize the Boost version first and then set the values using the [] operator it also works. Is there some way to make this work using push_back()?

    Read the article

  • Selecting first instance of class but not nested instances via jQuery

    - by DA
    Given the following hypothetical markup: <ul class="monkey"> <li> <p class="horse"></p> <p class="cow"></p> </li> </ul> <dl class="monkey"> <dt class="horse"></dt> <dd class="cow"> <dl> <dt></dt> <dd></dd> </dl> <dl class="monkey"> <dt class="horse"></dt> <dd class="cow"></dd> </dl> </dd> </dl> I want to be able to grab the 'first level' of horse and cow classes within each monkey class. But I don't want the NESTED horse and cow classes. I started with .children, but that won't work with the UL example as they aren't direct children of .monkey. I can use find: $('.monkey').find('.horse, .cow') but that returns all instances, including the nested ones. I can filter the find: $('.monkey').find('.horse, .cow').not('.cow .horse, .cow .cow') but that prevents me from selecting nested instances on a second function call. So...I guess what I'm looking for is 'find first "level" of this descendant'. I could likely do this with some looping logic, but was wondering if there is a selector and/or some combo of selectors that would achieve that logic.

    Read the article

  • In what situations is octal base used?

    - by Bob
    I've seen binary and hex used quite often but never octal. Yet octal has it's own convention for being used in some languages (ie, a leading 0 indicating octal base). When is octal used? What are some typical situations when one would use octal or octal would be easier to reason about? Or is it merely a matter of taste?

    Read the article

  • Detect LaTeX class name

    - by Matthew Leingang
    I'm working on a LaTeX package which might need to do some things differently depending on the class that's being used. I'm wondering if there's a way to auto-detect or test the document class. One could certainly look up the class files and test for the existence of a specific macro defined by that class, but is there a smarter way? I looked at the definition of the \ProvidesClass macro and can't see if it saves the class name anywhere except \@currname. I believe \@currname is just the name of the current package or class being read. Basically I want to execute \author{\longauthorname} in the article class but \author[\shortauthorname]{\longauthorname} in the beamer class.

    Read the article

  • Base 62 conversion in Python

    - by mikl
    How would you convert an integer to base 62 (like hexadecimal, but with these digits: '0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'). I have been trying to find a good Python library for it, but they all seems to be occupied with converting strings. The Python base64 module only accepts strings and turns a single digit into four characters. I was looking for something akin to what URL shorteners use.

    Read the article

  • Django models & Python class attributes

    - by Geo
    The tutorial on the django website shows this code for the models: from django.db import models class Poll(models.Model): question = models.CharField(max_length=200) pub_date = models.DateTimeField('date published') class Choice(models.Model): poll = models.ForeignKey(Poll) choice = models.CharField(max_length=200) votes = models.IntegerField() Now, each of those attribute, is a class attribute, right? So, the same attribute should be shared by all instances of the class. A bit later, they present this code: class Poll(models.Model): # ... def __unicode__(self): return self.question class Choice(models.Model): # ... def __unicode__(self): return self.choice How did they turn from class attributes into instance attributes? Did I get class attributes wrong?

    Read the article

  • Zend Framework decorator subform add a class tag to DD wrapper tag

    - by Samuele
    I have this form: class Request_Form_Prova extends Zend_Form { public function init() { $this->setMethod('post'); $SubForm_Step = new Zend_Form_SubForm(); $SubForm_Step->setAttrib('class','Step'); $this->addSubform($SubForm_Step, 'Chicco'); $PrivacyCheck = $SubForm_Step->createElement('CheckBox', 'PrivacyCheck'); $PrivacyCheck->setLabel('I have read and I agre bla bla...') ->setRequired(true) ->setUncheckedValue(''); $PrivacyCheck->getDecorator('Label')->setOption('class', 'inline'); $SubForm_Step->addElement($PrivacyCheck); $SubForm_Step->addElement('submit', 'submit', array( 'ignore' => true, 'label' => 'OK', )); } } That generate this HTML: <form enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" method="post" action=""> <dl class="zend_form"> <dt id="Chicco-label">&nbsp;</dt> <dd id="Chicco-element"> <fieldset id="fieldset-Chicco" class="Step"> <dl> <dt id="Chicco-PrivacyCheck-label"><label for="Chicco-PrivacyCheck" class="inline required">I have read and I agre bla bla...</label></dt> <dd id="Chicco-PrivacyCheck-element"> <input type="hidden" name="Chicco[PrivacyCheck]" value=""><input type="checkbox" name="Chicco[PrivacyCheck]" id="Chicco-PrivacyCheck" value="1"> </dd> <dt id="submit-label">&nbsp;</dt> <dd id="submit-element"> <input type="submit" name="Chicco[submit]" id="Chicco-submit" value="OK"> </dd> </dl> </fieldset> </dd> </dl> </form> How can I add a class="Test" to the <dd id="Chicco-element"> elemnt? In order to have it like that: <dd id="Chicco-element" class="Test"> I thought something like that but it don't work: $SubForm_Step->getDecorator('DdWrapper')->setOption('class', 'Test'); OR $SubForm_Step->getDecorator('DtDdWrapper')->setOption('class', 'Test'); How can I do it? And last question: How can I wrap that DD and DT element of a SubForm in another DL element? Like that: ( second line ) <dl class="zend_form"> <dl> <dt id="Chicco-label">&nbsp;</dt> <dd id="Chicco-element"> <fieldset id="fieldset-Chicco" class="Step"> <dl> .......

    Read the article

  • Django: How can I protect against concurrent modification of data base entries

    - by Ber
    If there a way to protect against concurrent modifications of the same data base entry by two or more users? It would be acceptable to show an error message to the user performing the second commit/save operation, but data should not be silently overwritten. I think locking the entry is not an option, as a user might use the "Back" button or simply close his browser, leaving the lock for ever.

    Read the article

  • the shema return by the new query differ from the base query

    - by sochandara
    I am working on class project which required to work with Windows Application and this issue occurred to me that i don understand how to solved it can anybody help please? I want to show the NATIONALITYNAME instead of showing NATIONALITYID in the grid view SELECT COACH.COACHID , COACH.COACHFIRSTNAME , COACH.COACHLASTNAME , NATIONALITY.NATIONALITY FROM COACH INNER JOIN NATIONALITY ON COACH.NATIONALITYID = NATIONALITY.NATIONALITYID Error Message: "The Schema returned by the new query differ from the base query"

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101  | Next Page >