Search Results

Search found 228 results on 10 pages for 'prototypes'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/10 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  | Next Page >

  • Implementing prototypes OR instantiating class objects

    - by intuited
    I'm wondering how to implement prototypal inheritance in Python. It seems like the way to do this would be to either use a metaclass to cause instantiations to actually be classes, rather than objects, or use some magical powers to transform an existing object into a class. The second method would seem to be more flexible, in that it could be applied to existing objects of varied types, while the first would likely be more convenient for typical use cases. Insights on the practicality of these two approaches, as well as alternative suggestions, are hereby requested.

    Read the article

  • Facebook totalement hors-service cette nuit, un employé aurait dévoilé des prototypes par erreur

    Facebook totalement hors-service cette nuit, un employé aurait dévoilé des prototypes par erreur Hier soir (à partir de 22h15 heure française), Facebook a été hors service pendant près de 30 minutes. Le site n'a pourtant subi aucune attaque extérieure. En fait, il a été mis hors ligne par la firme elle-même. En cause ? Lors du passage au nouveau design des pages de marques (avec une galerie photo repensée et de nouvelles fonctionnalités de management des pages), un ingénieur de l'équipe de développement a également déployé certains prototypes internes. Ces brouillons de futurs produits de Facebook auraient dû rester secrets, et c'est pourquoi le site a été désactivé : le temps pour son staff de nettoyer...

    Read the article

  • Creating WPF Prototypes with SketchFlow

    Prototyping with Sketchflow transforms what was once a frustrating and time-consuming chore. With SketchFlow, WPF prototypes can be created and changed with amazing ease. SketchFlow is WPF's secret weapon. Well, it was secret until Michael Sorens produced this article.

    Read the article

  • Agile language for 2d game prototypes?

    - by instanceofTom
    Occasionally ( read: when my fiancé allows ) I like to prototype different game or game-like ideas I have. Usually I use Java or C# (not xna yet) because they are the languages I have the most practice with. However I would like to learn something more suited to agile development; a language in which it would be easier to knock out quick prototypes. At my job I have recently been working with looser (weak/dynamically typed) languages, specifically python and groovy, and I think something similar would fit what I am looking for. So, my question is: What languages (and framework/engine) would be good for rapidly developing prototypes of 2d game concepts? A few notes: I don't need blazing fast bitcrunching performance. In this case I would strongly prefer ease of development over performance. I'd like to use a language with a healthy community, which to me means a fair amount of maintained 3rd party, libraries. I'd like the language to be cross-platform friendly, I work on a variety of different operating systems and would like something that is portable with minimum effort. I can't imagine myself using a language with out decent options for debugging and editor syntax highlighting support. Note: If you are aware of a Java or C# library/framework that you think streamlines producing game prototypes I open to learning something new for those languages too

    Read the article

  • How can pointers to functions point to something that doesn't exist in memory yet? Why do prototypes have different addresses?

    - by Kacy Raye
    To my knowledge, functions do not get added to the stack until run-time after they are called in the main function. So how can a pointer to a function have a function's memory address if it doesn't exist in memory? For example: using namespace std; #include <iostream> void func() { } int main() { void (*ptr)() = func; cout << reinterpret_cast<void*>(ptr) << endl; //prints 0x8048644 even though func never gets added to the stack } Also, this next question is a little less important to me, so if you only know the answer to my first question, then that is fine. But anyway, why does the value of the pointer ( the memory address of the function ) differ when I declare a function prototype and implement the function after main? In the first example, it printed out 0x8048644 no matter how many times I ran the program. In the next example, it printed out 0x8048680 no matter how many times I ran the program. For example: using namespace std; #include <iostream> void func(); int main() { void ( *ptr )() = func; cout << reinterpret_cast<void*>(ptr) << endl; } void func(){ }

    Read the article

  • Javascript functional inheritance with prototypes

    - by cdmckay
    In Douglas Crockford's JavaScript: The Good Parts he recommends that we use functional inheritance. Here's an example: var mammal = function(spec, my) { var that = {}; my = my || {}; // Protected my.clearThroat = function() { return "Ahem"; }; that.getName = function() { return spec.name; }; that.says = function() { return my.clearThroat() + ' ' + spec.saying || ''; }; return that; } var cat = function(spec, my) { var that = {}; my = my || {}; spec.saying = spec.saying || 'meow'; that = mammal(spec, my); that.purr = function() { return my.clearThroat() + " purr"; }; that.getName = function() { return that.says() + ' ' + spec.name + ' ' + that.says(); }; return that; }; var kitty = cat({name: "Fluffy"}); The main issue I have with this is that every time I make a mammal or cat the JavaScript interpreter has to re-compile all the functions in it. That is, you don't get to share the code between instances. My question is: how do I make this code more efficient? For example, if I was making thousands of cat objects, what is the best way to modify this pattern to take advantage of the prototype object?

    Read the article

  • What common programming problems are best solved by using prototypes and closures?

    - by vemv
    As much as I understand both concepts, I can't see how can I take advantage of JavaScript's closures and prototypes aside from using them for creating instantiable and/or encapsulated class-like blocks (which seems more of a workaround than an asset to me) Other JS features such as functions-as-values or logical evaluation of non-booleans are much easier to fall in love with... What common programming problems are best solved by using propotypal inheritance and closures?

    Read the article

  • constructors and inheritance in JS

    - by nandinga
    Hi all, This is about "inheritance" in JavaScript. Supose I create a constructor Bird(), and another called Parrot() which I make to "inherit" the props of Bird by asigning an instance of it to Parrot's prototype, like the following code shows: function Bird() { this.fly = function(){}; } function Parrot() { this.talk = function(){ alert("praa!!"); }; } Parrot.prototype = new Bird(); var p = new Parrot(); p.talk(); // Alerts "praa!!" alert(p.constructor); // Alerts the Bird function!?!?! After I've created an instance of Parrot, how comes that the .constructor property of it is Bird(), and not Parrot(), which is the constructor I've used to create the object? Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • Helper functions & prototype methods to replace heavy frameworks?

    - by Rob
    All frameworks aside, what are some of the common helper functions/prototype methods you use on a daily basis? Please note I am not arguing against frameworks. I've simply found that the majority of what I do on a daily basis can, most often, be done with a few dozen Array, String and Element.prototype methods. With the addition of a few helper functions like $ (getElementsById) and $$$ (getElementsByClass), I am able to satisfy some of the core benefits, however basic, of a much heavier framework. If you were to collect a small library of basic methods and functions to replace the core functionality of some of the popular frameworks, what would they be?

    Read the article

  • c++ inline functions

    - by user69514
    i'm confused about how to do inline functions in C++.... lets say this function. how would it be turned to an inline function int maximum( int x, int y, int z ) { int max = x; if ( y > max ) max = y; if ( z > max ) max = z; return max; }

    Read the article

  • Any way in C++ to forward declare a function prototype?

    - by jsyjr
    I make regular use of forward class declarations and pointers to such classes. I now have a need to pass a function pointer through a number of layers. I would prefer to include the header that declares my function pointer's prototype only into the module that dereferences a function pointer rather than into each layer that simply passes along that pointer value. Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • What are the benefits of a classical structure over a prototyple one?

    - by Rixius
    I have only recently started programming significantly, and being completely self-taught, I unfortunately don't have the benefits of a detailed Computer science course. I've been reading a lot about JavaScript lately, and I'm trying to find the benefit in classes over the prototype nature of JavaScript. The question seems to be drawn down the middle of which one is better, and I want to see the classical side of it. When I look at the prototype example: var inst_a = { "X": 123, "Y": 321, add: function () { return this.X+this.Y; } }; document.write(inst_a.add()); And then the classical version function A(x,y){ this.X = x; this.Y = y; this.add = function(){ return this.X+this.Y; }; }; var inst_a = new A(123,321); document.write(inst_a.add()); I begun thinking about this because I'm looking at the new ecmascript revision 5 and a lot of people seem up in arms that they didn't add a Class system.

    Read the article

  • Why does this C program compile?

    - by AdmiralJonB
    I've just come across someone's C code that I'm confused as to why it is compiling. There are two points I don't understand. First, the function prototype has no parameters compared to the actual function definition. Secondly, the parameter in the function definition doesn't have an type. #include <stdio.h> int func(); int func(param) { return param; } int main() { int bla = func(10); printf("%d",bla); } Could someone please explain to me why this works? I've tested it in a couple of compilers and it works fine.

    Read the article

  • Must declare function prototype in C?

    - by Mohit Deshpande
    I am kind of new to C (I have prior Java, C#, and some C++ experience). In C, is it necessary to declare a function prototype or can the code compile without it? Is it good programming practice to do so? Or does it just depend on the compiler? (I am running Ubuntu 9.10 and using the GNU C Compiler, or gcc, under the Code::Blocks IDE)

    Read the article

  • Prototype.js: How can i return an array without all the methods Prototypes extends Array with?

    - by Morten
    Hi! Is there a way to return a new version of an array/hash that does not contain all the methods/functions that prototype extends the array object with? Example: var myArray = $A(); myArray['test'] = '1'; myArray['test2'] = '2'; var myVariableToPassToAjax = myArray; If I debug myVariableToPassToAjax it looks like this: Array ( [test] = 1 [test2] = 2 [each] = function each(iterator, context) { .......... .......... } ...and all the other extended array functions ); Is there a way to solve this? :-/ Morten

    Read the article

  • Prototypes Object.extend with multiple objects that contain there own functions.

    - by erickreutz
    How would I achieve something along the lines of this.. var Persistence = new Lawnchair('name'); Object.extend(Lawnchair.prototype, { UserDefaults: { setup: function(callback) { // "save" is a native Lawnchair function that doesnt //work because // "this" does not reference "Lawnchair" // but if I am one level up it does. Say if I defined // a function called UserDefaults_setup() it would work // but UserDefaults.setup does not work. this.save({key: 'key', value: 'value'}); // What is this functions scope? // How do I access Lawnchairs "this" } }, Schedule: { refresh: function(callback) { } } }); //this get called but doesnt work. Persistence.UserDefaults.setup();

    Read the article

  • Can Visual Studio manage function prototypes for me in C++ header files?

    - by Gibybo
    In C++, the common practice is to declare functions in header files and define them in cpp files. This leads to always having two copies of every function's prototype. Then whenever I want to change a function's name/return value/parameter, I have to manually change it in both files. This seems unnecessarily tedious and there must be lots of people that share my pain, so is there a way to automate these changes between files in VS? Bonus points for vim solutions as well.

    Read the article

  • Do I need to declare all my JQuery prototypes in a JQueryStatic definition file with typescript?

    - by Marilou
    I have the following code: ///<reference path="../typescript/jquery.d.ts" /> function addThemePrototypes() { var templateSetup = new Array(); $.fn.addTemplateSetup = function(func, prioritary) { if (prioritary) { templateSetup.unshift(func); } else { templateSetup.push(func); } }; } When I try to add the following: $('a').addTemplateSetup( Into this same file I notice there is no intellisense and typescript does not seem to know about the addTemplateSetup prototype that I just added. Is this the correct way for it to work or do I always need to add things like the definition for addTemplateSetup to an JQueryStatic definition file and then include that?

    Read the article

  • "jpeglib.h: No such file or directory" ghostscript port in OPENBSD

    - by holms
    Hello I have a problem with compiling a ghostscript from ports in openbsd 4.7. SO i have jpeg-7 installed, I have latest port tree for obsd4.7. ===> Building for ghostscript-8.63p11 mkdir -p /usr/ports/pobj/ghostscript-8.63p11/ghostscript-8.63/obj gmake LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib -shared' GS_XE=./obj/../obj/libgs.so.11.0 STDIO_IMPLEMENTATION=c DISPLAY_DEV=./obj/../obj/display.dev BINDIR=./obj/../obj GLGENDIR=./obj/../obj GLOBJDIR=./obj/../obj PSGENDIR=./obj/../obj PSOBJDIR=./obj/../obj CFLAGS='-O2 -fno-reorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i386 -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin -fno-common -DGS_DEVS_SHARED -DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/8.63\"' prefix=/usr/local ./obj/../obj/gsc gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/pobj/ghostscript-8.63p11/ghostscript-8.63' cc -I./obj/../obj -I./src -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -O2 -fno-reorder-blocks -fno-reorder-functions -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i386 -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-builtin -fno-common -DGS_DEVS_SHARED -DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/8.63\" -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE='unsigned long long' -o ./obj/../obj/sdctc.o -c ./src/sdctc.c In file included from src/sdctc.c:17: obj/jpeglib_.h:1:21: jpeglib.h: No such file or directory In file included from src/sdctc.c:19: src/sdct.h:58: error: field `err' has incomplete type src/sdct.h:70: error: field `err' has incomplete type src/sdct.h:72: error: field `cinfo' has incomplete type src/sdct.h:73: error: field `destination' has incomplete type src/sdct.h:84: error: field `err' has incomplete type src/sdct.h:87: error: field `dinfo' has incomplete type src/sdct.h:88: error: field `source' has incomplete type gmake[1]: *** [obj/../obj/sdctc.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/pobj/ghostscript-8.63p11/ghostscript-8.63' gmake: *** [so] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript/gnu (line 2225 of /usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk). I tried to place one more param in CFLAGS in Makefile with value "-I/usr/local" but no luck =( People in irc [freenode server, #openbsd channel] refuses give any help for ports at all, and even more - because this is 4.7 unstable version. I have my reasons to use this version and ports believe me =) CFLAGS+= -DSYS_TYPES_HAS_STDINT_TYPES \ -I${LOCALBASE}/include \ -I${LOCALBASE}/include/ijs \ -I${LOCALBASE}/include/libpng \

    Read the article

  • centos: linking lib that doesn't have a .pc file for pkg-config

    - by Paulie
    I'm trying to compile svg2pdf on centos. I think I've managed to get the required dependencies installed using yum: sudo yum install librsvg2 sudo yum install cairo The Makefile contains: MYCFLAGS=`pkg-config --cflags librsvg-2.0 cairo-pdf` -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations - Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing MYLDFLAGS=`pkg-config --libs librsvg-2.0 cairo-pdf` After typing 'make', the first couple of lines of output are: cc `pkg-config --cflags librsvg-2.0 cairo-pdf` -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fno-strict-aliasing `pkg-config --libs librsvg-2.0 cairo-pdf` svg2pdf.c -o svg2pdf Package librsvg-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `librsvg-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'librsvg-2.0' found There is no librsvg-2.0.pc on this system (but there is when I installed this using macports on my macbookpro). How should I get this package linked? Should I change the Makefile, and if so, to what? Should I generate the .pc files, and if so, how? Or is there another way to resolve this? Or, has anyone been successful at installing svg2pdf on centos, and, if so, how did you manage it? I don't have much experience on linux, so I might be missing something obvious.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  | Next Page >