Search Results

Search found 2949 results on 118 pages for 'xhtml 1 0 strict'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/118 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • We Convert your PSD into Xhtml

    - by Aditi
    From last few months we have been receiving a lot of inquires for  Psd into Xhtml projects, while we were majorly focusing on custom WordPress, Magento, Drupal & Joomla Projects. Now we are offering PSD into Xhtml/CSS service at an affordable price looking at its demand. We also will cater PSD into any CMS, like wordpress, Drupal, Magento or Joomla. Our custom services will continue as it is. It is very convenient to get your design converted by our Xhtml & CSS experts. We assure 24 hour delivery time. At JustSkins, we have a structured conversion model that works well for any kind of potentially enriched web business solution. Our customized slicing guidelines, besides, W3C approved XHTML and CSS code naming conventions makes us stand distinct from the competitors. Why Should You Let us do it for you? W3C Compliant HTML/XHTML and CSS Codes Well Structured and Written Code. Clean and Hand Coded Mark up no use of WYSIWYG. We offer Fast turn around timeDesign converted into Xhtml/CSS just in one business day. Multi- Browser Accessible Websites Cross-Platform Support. Excellent Customer Service. Affordable We at JustSkins are team of efficient programmers with vast experience in templating for   content management systems (CMS),  Joomla, Drupal, WordPress and other Open Source technologies. Contact us today for your requirement!

    Read the article

  • jQuery Templates - XHTML Validation

    - by hajan
    Many developers have already asked me about this. How to make XHTML valid the web page which uses jQuery Templates. Maybe you have already tried, and I don't know what are your results but here is my opinion regarding this. By default, Visual Studio.NET adds the xhtml1-transitional.dtd schema <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> So, if you try to validate your page which has jQuery Templates against this schema, your page won't be XHTML valid. Why? It's because when creating templates, we use HTML tags inside <script> ... </script> block. Yes, I know that the script block has type="text/html" but it's not supported in this schema, thus it's not valid. Let's try validate the following code Code <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head>     <title>jQuery Templates :: XHTML Validation</title>     <script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-1.4.4.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>     <script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery.templates/beta1/jquery.tmpl.js" type="text/javascript"></script>          <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">         $(function () {             var attendees = [                 { Name: "Hajan", Surname: "Selmani", speaker: true, phones: [070555555, 071888999, 071222333] },                 { Name: "Denis", Surname: "Manski", phones: [070555555, 071222333] }             ];             $("#myTemplate").tmpl(attendees).appendTo("#attendeesList");         });     </script>     <script id="myTemplate" type="text/html">          <li>             ${Name} ${Surname}             {{if speaker}}                 (<font color="red">speaks</font>)             {{else}}                 (attendee)             {{/if}}         </li>     </script>      </head>     <body>     <ol id="attendeesList"></ol> </body> </html> To validate it, go to http://validator.w3.org/#validate_by_input and copy paste the code rendered on client-side browser (it’s almost the same, only the template is rendered inside OL so LI tags are created for each item). Press CHECK and you will get: Result: 1 Errors, 2 warning(s)  The error message says: Validation Output: 1 Error Line 21, Column 13: document type does not allow element "li" here <li> Yes, the <li> HTML element is not allowed inside the <script>, so how to make it valid? FIRST: Using <![CDATA][…]]> The first thing that came in my mind was the CDATA. So, by wrapping any HTML tag which is in script blog, inside <![CDATA[ ........ ]]> it will make our code valid. However, the problem is that the template won't render since the template tags {} cannot get evaluated if they are inside CDATA. Ok, lets try with another approach. SECOND: HTML5 validation Well, if we just remove the strikethrough part bellow of the !DOPCTYPE <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> our template is going to be checked as HTML5 and will be valid. Ok, there is another approach I've also tried: THIRD: Separate template to an external file We can separate the template to external file. I didn’t show how to do this previously, so here is the example. 1. Add HTML file with name Template.html in your ASPX website. 2. Place your defined template there without <script> tag Content inside Template.html <li>     ${Name} ${Surname}     {{if speaker}}         (<font color="red">speaks</font>)     {{else}}         (attendee)     {{/if}} </li> 3. Call the HTML file using $.get() jQuery ajax method and render the template with data using $.tmpl() function. $.get("/Templates/Template.html", function (template) {     $.tmpl(template, attendees).appendTo("#attendeesList"); }); So the complete code is: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head>     <title>jQuery Templates :: XHTML Validation</title>     <script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-1.4.4.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>     <script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jquery.templates/beta1/jquery.tmpl.js" type="text/javascript"></script>          <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">         $(function () {             var attendees = [                 { Name: "Hajan", Surname: "Selmani", speaker: true, phones: [070555555, 071888999, 071222333] },                 { Name: "Denis", Surname: "Manski", phones: [070555555, 071222333] }             ];             $.get("/Templates/Template.html", function (template) {                 $.tmpl(template, attendees).appendTo("#attendeesList");             });         });     </script>      </head>     <body>     <ol id="attendeesList"></ol> </body> </html> This document was successfully checked as XHTML 1.0 Transitional! Result: Passed If you have any additional methods for XHTML validation, you can share it :). Thanks,Hajan

    Read the article

  • Can XHTML nest more XHTML?

    - by zneak
    It's legal to nest SVG documents inside XHTML documents; but is it legal to nest XHTML documents inside other XHTML documents in the same fashion? <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>Sup</title> </head> <body> <h1>Hello World!</h1> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>Nested document</title> </head> <body> <p>This is a sample</p> </body> </html> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Recommended requirements when outsourcing xhtml/css site building?

    - by András Szepesházi
    I'm considering outsourcing a part of our web application development project for freelancers, namely the site building part. What I mean by site building is the process of creating the xhtml/css template files, with dummy content, from a psd file (or any other graphical layout file). The resulting xhtml/css files will be used by our developers as templates for cms based page rendering. The cms in this case is Drupal, but that might not be of much relevance. I'm looking for a good set of requirements, that will result in good quality xhtml/css code, complying with today's standards leaves little to the freelancer developer's imagination in terms of what I need I'm thinking about requirements like: Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional document type, validated by validator.w3.org Identical rendering in all modern browsers (FF, Chrome, Safari, Opera, IE7-8) and also in IE6 All opening and closing block-level elements should be properly commented, referencing the functional part of the user interface they belong to (menu, toolbar, content, etc) No inline CSS definitions And so on. How would you organize a list like that? What requirements would you add?

    Read the article

  • Visual Web Developer 2008 Express and XHTML 1.1 (not applying)

    - by Mike Valeriano
    Hello. I may be missing something since I'm not used to work with IDEs for web development, so please understand if I'm doing something stupid. I've picked a copy of Beginning ASP.NET 3.5 in C# and VB to try and learn this thing quickly. I'm no HTML guru, but I know something about the DTDs and I want to either use XHTML 1.0 Strict or XHTML 1.1 while learning the ins and outs of ASP.NET. Following the book (just started actually), I'm not having any trouble understanding the concepts, since I have a C# background, but what I don't understand is how VWD goes about applying the schema you select for validation. The book explains that the drop-down list on the toolbar is enough to set this, so that's what I did: I've selected XHTML 1.1 (since there is no 1.0 strict option, what I find really odd) and then started the project. The thing is that the code generated automatically for the Default page had the XHTML 1.0 transitional DTD. Every other page added had the same DTD, even though XHTML 1.1 is still the selected schema in the drop-down list. I decided to test it out and there it was: inserting some text in the design view and then applying a bold formatting just inserted < b tags on the code. Changing color does add a span tag with added CSS though. What I want to know is: if I want strict XHTML (or 1.1) should I just code it manually? Or is there a "fix" for this problem (having a schema selected but not applied by the IDE)? Am I missing something really easy and dumb? I have no problem with coding it manually - I actually prefer doing that. The thing is that I really wanna try this WYSIWYG approach for once, since some developers swear by it. Plus I don't know yet if I'll need special tags for ASP.NET, so I think having them inserted automatically should be the best practice. I couldn't find any similar problems around (MSDN, Google, here), and as far as the book goes (up to the point I've read), this is the expected VWD behavior, which I find suspect at least. Sorry for the long text (and poor English - not my primary language). Thanks in advance for any help/tips.

    Read the article

  • HTML Strict increases line height...

    - by Ryano
    Hi Why does XHTML 1.0 Strict display a line height as appearing larger than a line height of the same value in XHTML 1.0 Transitional? This therefore pushing down content within table cells (i.e Hotmail in Firefox, Gmail in IE and Firefox). Has anyone else experienced this issue and know a way around it? Cheers

    Read the article

  • Right way to center a <div> in xhtml?

    - by Meredith
    Im working with a XHTML 1.0 Transitional doctype html file, and I want to have a main div with 800px width and make it appears centered (not the div content, but the div itself). I've used this on the past: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title></title> <style> <!-- html, body { margin:0; padding:0; } #main-container { background:black; width:800px; } --> </style> </head> <body> <center> <div id="main-container"> Content </div> </center> </body> </html> But I am not sure if this is cross-browser compatible, or if its valid xhtml.

    Read the article

  • XHtml Strict, Float: Center ?

    - by Axel Myers
    Hi everyone. I'm having hard time with Xhtml Strict 1.0 and Css. And I'm almost out of solutions. My Site Url: http://www.pro-turk.net/beta/ I made a jquery multilevel dropdown menu for my site. It looks like OK, but I have used inline-block property of css display attribute on navigation menu which is a part of css 2.1 and isn't supported by some browsers (including ie6 and ie7). I want to make #nav li elements block level elements, but to do this and having all of them in same line, the only way is using float in #nav li. But I want to center them in their parent (the menu bar). So I need something like float:center (I know it's pretty stupid and doesn't exist). But is there a way to include block level elements as children elements without linebreaks (I mean without making a block level element). Regards.

    Read the article

  • Why is XHTML1.1 dated *before* XHTML1.0 ? What is the preferred XHTML today?

    - by Cheeso
    I'm not clear on the status of XHTML - v1.0 and v1.1. Can someone explain which is preferred at this point, and why? The specs from w3c say that XHTML 1.1 predates* XHTML 1.0, which is exactly counter-intuitive, to me. http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/ - W3C Recommendation 31 May 2001 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ - W3C Recommentation, updated 1 August 2002 Also, I noted earlier today that the latest version of htmltidy emits XHTML 1.0, when I request xhtml. Hmmm....Even though the XHTML 1.1 spec is 9 years old, it's still not supported by mainstream tools. That suggests that XHTML 1.1 is either completely unnecessary or spurious. Which one should I use if I am authoring pages today? What if I am building tools - should I bother to support both? Or do I need only one? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • XHTML Validation issue trying to render '&' character inside an ASP.Net control

    - by Micah
    Ok, the description is kind of funky, but here's my problem: <asp:ListItem Value="0">All Leads <i>(include Archive & Trash)</i></asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="0">All Leads <i>(include Archive &amp; Trash)</i></asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem Value="0" Text="All Leads <i>(include Archive & Trash)</i>" /> <asp:ListItem Value="0" Text="All Leads <i>(include Archive &amp; Trash)</i>" /> All three versions render the following html All Leads <i>(include Archive & Trash)</i> This of course fails XHTML validation. It needs to render the html like this: All Leads <i>(include Archive &amp; Trash)</i> How can I fix this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • gcc, strict-aliasing, and horror stories

    - by Joseph Quinsey
    In http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2906365/gcc-strict-aliasing-and-casting-through-a-union I asked whether anyone had encountered problems with union punning through pointers. So far, the answer seems to be No. This question is broader: do you have any horror stories about gcc and strict-aliasing? Background: Quoting from AndreyT's answer in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2771023/c99-strict-aliasing-rules-in-c-gcc/2771041#2771041: "Strict aliasing rules are rooted in parts of the standard that were present in C and C++ since the beginning of [standardized] times. The clause that prohibits accessing object of one type through a lvalue of another type is present in C89/90 (6.3) as well as in C++98 (3.10/15). ... It is just that not all compilers wanted (or dared) to enforce it or rely on it." Well, gcc is now daring to do so, with its -fstrict-aliasing switch. And this has caused some problems. See, for example, the excellent article http://davmac.wordpress.com/2009/10/ about a Mysql bug, and the equally excellent discussion in http://cellperformance.beyond3d.com/articles/2006/06/understanding-strict-aliasing.html. Some other less-relevant links: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1225741/performance-impact-of-fno-strict-aliasing http://stackoverflow.com/questions/754929/strict-aliasing http://stackoverflow.com/questions/262379/when-is-char-safe-for-strict-pointer-aliasing http://stackoverflow.com/questions/725138/how-to-detect-strict-aliasing-at-compile-time So to repeat, do you have a horror story of your own? Problems not indicated by -Wstrict-aliasing would, of course, be preferred. And other C compilers are also welcome.

    Read the article

  • built-in schema datatype for html / xhtml

    - by John Clements
    Is there a built-in schema datatype for xhtml data? Suppose I want to specify a "boozle" element that contains two "woozles", each of which is arbitrary xhtml. I want to write something like this, using the relax NG compact syntax: namespace nifty = "http://brinckerhoff.org/nifty/" start = element nifty:boozle {woozle, woozle} woozle = element nifty:woozle {xhtml} Unfortunately, xmllint then signals this error: ./lab.rng:43: element ref: Relax-NG parser error : Reference xhtml has no matching definition ./lab.rng:43: element ref: Relax-NG parser error : Internal found no define for ref xhtml So my question is this: is there something sensible that I should put in place of "xhtml" above?

    Read the article

  • TinyMCE is modifying the XHTML 1.0 Strict HTML I input. How can I stop it?

    - by Matt
    The code I want to have saved through TinyMCE is as follows: <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="550" height="90" id="homepage-banner"> <param name="movie" value="/images/header.swf" /> <param name="wmode" value="transparent" /> <!--[if !IE]>--> <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="/images/header.swf" width="550" height="90"> <param name="wmode" value="transparent" /> <!--<![endif]--> <img src="/images/header.jpg" width="550" height="90" alt="" border="0" /> <!--[if !IE]>--> </object> <!--<![endif]--> </object> Sadly, what I end up with is: <object data="/images/header.swf" height="90" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="550"> <param name="id" value="homepage-banner" /> <param name="wmode" value="transparent" /> <param name="src" value="/images/header.swf" /> </object> The purpose of the stripped parts of the code is to provide a fallback image if flash is not available on the client. In my tinyMCE.init({ ... }); I am using verify_html: true and valid_elements is set as per this forum topic whereby all valid XHTML 1.0 Strict elements are allowed. I have checked and the above code does comply with the XHTML 1.0 Strict standard. I have tried just setting verify_html to false but it had no effect. How can TinyMCE be configured to leave my HTML alone?!

    Read the article

  • HTML 4, HTML 5, XHTML, MIME types - the definitive resource

    - by deceze
    The topics of HTML vs. XHTML and XHTML as text/html vs. XHTML as XHTML are quite complex. Unfortunately it's hard to get a complete picture, since information is spread mostly in bits and pieces around the web or is buried deep in W3C tech jargon. In addition there's some misinformation being circulated. I propose to make this the definite SO resource about the topic, describing the most important aspects of: HTML 4 HTML 5 XHTML 1.0/1.1 as text/html XHTML 1.0/1.1 as XHTML What are the practical implications of each? What are common pitfalls? What is the importance of proper MIME types for each? How do different browsers handle them? I'd like to see one answer per technology. I'm making this a community wiki, so rather than contributing redundant answers, please edit answers to complete the picture. Feel free to start with stubs. Also feel free to edit this question.

    Read the article

  • HTML 4, HTML 5, XHTML, MIME types - the definite resource

    - by deceze
    The topics of HTML vs. XHTML and XHTML as text/html vs. XHTML as XHTML are quite complex. Unfortunately it's hard to get a complete picture, since information is spread mostly in bits and pieces around the web or is buried deep in W3C tech jargon. In addition there's some misinformation being circulated. I propose to make this the definite SO resource about the topic, describing the most important aspects of: HTML 4 HTML 5 XHTML 1.0/1.1 as text/html XHTML 1.0/1.1 as XHTML What are the practical implications of each? What are common pitfalls? What is the importance of proper MIME types for each? How do different browsers handle them? I'd like to see one answer per technology. I'm making this a community wiki, so rather than contributing redundant answers, please edit answers to complete the picture. Feel free to start with stubs. Also feel free to edit this question.

    Read the article

  • jQuery .load() XHTML issue

    - by Urfe
    I am having some strange problems loading content from another XHTML page via jQuery. When the second page I try to load from is served as XHTML I get the below error. I don't know if it helps but both documents validate when I get the error. Uncaught Error: NO_MODIFICATION_ALLOWED_ERR: DOM Exception 7 Currently the header on the second page I load from is: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> <meta name="language" content="en" /> <title>some title</title> <!-- CSS & Javascript included here --> </head> The content type is set as: application/xhtml+xml;charset=iso-8859-1 Interestingly, when I remove all the XHTML stuff from the header and stop setting the content type the error does not occur and everything works great. The load process currently looks like the below. It works fine when everything is plain HTML. $('#overpage').find(".wrap").load(this.getTrigger().attr("href")+" #op").show(); I'm curious why the process only does not work when the second page I load from is XHTML. I don't want to serve the page as just plain HTML and am looking for advice on what I am doing wrong. Both pages validate and I'm really scratching my head here. Many thanks!

    Read the article

  • Tools to convert option strict off code into option strict on?

    - by deerchao
    I have to take over a project written in vb.net, which more than 400k lines of code written in option strict off mode. I want to build it under option strict on first before I do anything else -- which maybe converting it into C#. I found there's thousands of lines of code raises compilation error, mostly are about implicit type casts. Is there any tool would help to make it compile under option strict on mode if I don't want to correct every single line manually?

    Read the article

  • C99 strict aliasing rules in C++ (GCC)

    - by Checkers
    As far as I understand, GCC supports all of its C99 features in C++. But how is C99 strict aliasing handled in C++ code? I know that casting with C casts between unrelated types is not strict-aliasing-safe and may generate incorrect code, but what about C++? Since strict aliasing is not part of C++ standard (is that correct?), GCC must be specifying the semantics itself. I figure const_cast and static_cast cast between related types, hence they are safe, while reinterpret_cast can break strict aliasing rules. Is this a correct understanding?

    Read the article

  • Avoid richfaces to send back javascript libraries in the ajax responses

    - by pakore
    I'm using JSF 1.2 with Richfaces, and for every ajax request, the server is sending back the response, whichi is good, but it also contains all the links to the javascript files. I want to improve the performance so I just want the <body> to be returned, because all the javascript files are already loaded in the browser when the user logs in (my app is not restful). How can i do that? Thanks This is an example of a response to reRender an image when clicking a button. <?xml version="1.0"?> <html lang="nl_NL" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title></title><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/css/basic_both.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/css/extended_both.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" media="rich-extended-skinning" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/page.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg.ajax4jsf.javascript.PrototypeScript.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg.ajax4jsf.javascript.AjaxScript.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg.ajax4jsf.javascript.ImageCacheScript.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/browser_info.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/ajax4jsf/javascript/scripts/form.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/tabPanel.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/tabPanel.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/jquery/jquery.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/jquery.utils.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/json/json-mini.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg.ajax4jsf.javascript.DnDScript.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/utils.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/json/json-dom.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/dnd/dnd-common.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/dnd/dnd-draggable.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/dnd/dnd-dropzone.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/form.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/script/controlUtils.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/common-scrollable-data-table.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/extended-data-table.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/drag-indicator.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/ext-dt-drag-indicator.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/ext-dt-simple-draggable.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/ext-dt-simple-dropzone.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/css/dragIndicator.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/extendedDataTable.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/menu.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/context-menu.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/available.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/menu.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/menucomponents.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/tooltip.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/css/tooltip.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/datascroller.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/datascroller.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/modalPanel.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/modalPanelBorders.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/css/modalPanel.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/tiny_mce/tiny_mce_src.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/editor.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/editor.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/events.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/scriptaculous/effects.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/JQuerySpinBtn.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/calendar.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/css/calendar.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/panelbar.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/panelbar.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/comboboxUtils.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/utils.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/inplaceinputstyles.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalscripts/inplaceinput.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><link class="component" href="/eyeprevent/a4j/s/3_3_3.Finalcss/inplaceinput.xcss/DATB/eAF7sqpgb-jyGdIAFrMEaw__.xhtml" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" /><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finalorg/richfaces/renderkit/html/scripts/skinning.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script><script src="/eyeprevent/a4j/g/3_3_3.Finaljquery.js.xhtml" type="text/javascript"> </script></head> <body> <img id="j_id305:supportImage" src="/eyeprevent/image/os-ir-central.jpg" width="50%" /> <meta name="Ajax-Update-Ids" content="j_id305:supportImage" /> <span id="ajax-view-state"><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="javax.faces.ViewState" value="j_id24" autocomplete="off" /> </span><meta id="Ajax-Response" name="Ajax-Response" content="true" /> <meta name="Ajax-Update-Ids" content="j_id305:supportImage" /> <span id="ajax-view-state"><input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="javax.faces.ViewState" value="j_id24" autocomplete="off" /> </span><meta id="Ajax-Response" name="Ajax-Response" content="true" /> </body> </html> And this is the code that generated it: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core" xmlns:a4j="http://richfaces.org/a4j" xmlns:rich="http://richfaces.org/rich"> <ui:composition> <h:form> <h:panelGrid columns="1"> <a4j:region> <h:graphicImage id="supportImage" value="#{user.support.imagePath}" rendered="#{user.support.imageLoaded}" width="50%" /> </a4j:region> <h:panelGroup> <a4j:commandButton action="#{user.support.acceptImage}" value="YES" reRender="supportImage"/> <a4j:commandButton action="#{user.support.rejectImage}" value="NO" reRender="supportImage"/> </h:panelGroup> </h:panelGrid> </h:form> </ui:composition> </html>

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET XHTML Strict Validation & autocomplete=off

    - by Alyn
    We have an ASP.NET form with the following doctype:- We need to add autocomplete=off (by setting the TextBox property of AutoCompleteType="Disabled") to the input fields but still need the form to pass XHTML Validation (yes I know it's not XHTML valid because of this). Is there anythign we can do to ignore the autocomplete=off?? Something like:- !ATTLIST input autocomplete CDATA #IMPLIED Thanks in advance. Al.

    Read the article

  • boost::bind breaks strict-aliasing rules?

    - by Kyle
    Using Boost 1.43 and GCC 4.4.3, the following code boost::bind(&SomeObject::memberFunc, this, _1)); Generates the following warning boost/function/function_base.hpp:321: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules What's the correct way to eliminate these warnings without setting -fno-strict-aliasing?

    Read the article

  • dhtmlx grid in xhtml page

    - by user302254
    I need the dxhtmlgrid to work in a xhtml page. All the examples are in plain html and when I try and convert to xhtml I get errors. Can anyone help me get a dhtmlxgrid to work in a xhtml page? I am generating my grid from a table: http://dhtmlx.com/docs/products/dhtmlxGrid/samples/12_initialization_loading/03_grid_int_from_html.html I get the following javascript error message: this.hdr.rows is undefined [Break on this error] this.cellWidthPX[fcols[i]]=next;summ+...etTimeout(function(){self.setSizes()

    Read the article

  • Extending XHTML

    - by Daniel Schaffer
    I'm playing around with writing a jQuery plugin that uses an attribute to define form validation behavior (yes, I'm aware there's already a validation plugin; this is as much a learning exercise as something I'll be using). Ideally, I'd like to have something like this: Example 1 - input: <input id="name" type="text" v:onvalidate="return this.value.length > 0;" /> Example 2 - wrapper: <div v:onvalidate="return $(this).find('[value]').length > 0;"> <input id="field1" type="text" /> <input id="field2" type="text" /> <input id="field3" type="text" /> </div> Example 3 - predefined: <input id="name" type="text" v:validation="not empty" /> The goal here is to allow my jQuery code to figure out which elements need to be validated (this is already done) and still have the markup be valid XHTML, which is what I'm having a problem with. I'm fairly sure this will require a combination of both DTD and XML Schema, but I'm not really quite sure how exactly to execute. Based on this article, I've created the following DTD: <!ENTITY % XHTML1-formvalidation1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 +FormValidation 1.0//EN" "http://new.dandoes.net/DTD/FormValidation1.dtd" > %XHTML1-formvalidation1; <!ENTITY % Inlspecial.extra "%div.qname; " > <!ENTITY % xhmtl-model.mod SYSTEM "formvalidation-model-1.mod" > <!ENTITY % xhtml11.dtd PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd" > %xhtml11.dtd; And here is "formvalidation-model-1": <!ATTLIST %div.qname; %onvalidation CDATA #IMPLIED %XHTML1-formvalidation1.xmlns.extra.attrib; > I've never done DTD before, so I'm not even really exactly sure what I'm doing. When I run my page through the W3 XHTML validator, I get 80+ errors because it's getting duplicate definitions of all the XHTML elements. Am I at least on the right track? Any suggestions? EDIT: I removed this section from my custom DTD, because it turned out that it was actually self-referencing, and the code I got the template from was really for combining two DTDs into one, not appending specific items to one: <!ENTITY % XHTML1-formvalidation1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 +FormValidation 1.0//EN" "http://new.dandoes.net/DTD/FormValidation1.dtd" > %XHTML1-formvalidation1; I also removed this, because it wasn't validating, and didn't seem to be doing anything: <!ENTITY % Inlspecial.extra "%div.qname; " > Additionally, I decided that since I'm only adding a handful of additional items, the separate files model recommended by W3 doesn't really seem that helpful, so I've put everything into the dtd file, the content of which is now this: <!ATTLIST div onvalidate CDATA #IMPLIED> <!ENTITY % xhtml11.dtd PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd" > %xhtml11.dtd; So now, I'm not getting any DTD-related validation errors, but the onvalidate attribute still is not valid. Update: I've ditched the DTD and added a schema: http://schema.dandoes.net/FormValidation/1.0.xsd Using v:onvalidate appears to validate in Visual Studio, but the W3C service still doesn't like it. Here's a page where I'm using it so you can look at the source: http://new.dandoes.net/auth And here's the link to the w3c validation result: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://new.dandoes.net/auth&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0 Is this about as close as I'll be able to get with this, or am I still doing something wrong?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >