I have the following code, which when is running inside of a thread (the full code is here - https://github.com/eWizardII/homobabel/blob/master/lovebird.py)

 for null in range(0,1):
            while True:
                try:
                    with open('C:/Twitter/tweets/user_0_' + str(self.id) + '.json', mode='w') as f:
                        f.write('[')
                        threadLock.acquire()
                        for i, seed in enumerate(Cursor(api.user_timeline,screen_name=self.ip).items(200)):
                            if i>0:
                                f.write(", ")
                            f.write("%s" % (json.dumps(dict(sc=seed.author.statuses_count))))
                            j = j + 1
                        threadLock.release()
                        f.write("]")
                except tweepy.TweepError, e:
                    with open('C:/Twitter/tweets/user_0_' + str(self.id) + '.json', mode='a') as f:
                        f.write("]")
                    print "ERROR on " + str(self.ip) + " Reason: ", e
                    with open('C:/Twitter/errors_0.txt', mode='a') as a_file:
                        new_ii = "ERROR on " + str(self.ip) + " Reason: " + str(e) + "\n"
                        a_file.write(new_ii)
                break

Now without the thread lock I generate the following error:

Exception in thread Thread-117: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "C:\Python27\lib\threading.py", line 530, in __bootstrap_inner
    self.run()   File "C:/Twitter/homobabel/lovebird.py", line 62, in run
    for i, seed in enumerate(Cursor(api.user_timeline,screen_name=self.ip).items(200)): File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\cursor.py", line 110, in next
    self.current_page = self.page_iterator.next()   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\cursor.py", line 85, in next
    items = self.method(page=self.current_page,
*self.args, **self.kargs)   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\binder.py", line 196, in _call
    return method.execute()   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\binder.py", line 182, in execute
    result = self.api.parser.parse(self, resp.read())   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\parsers.py", line 75, in parse
    result = model.parse_list(method.api, json)   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\models.py", line 38, in parse_list
    results.append(cls.parse(api, obj))   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\models.py", line 49, in parse
    user = User.parse(api, v)   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\models.py", line 86, in parse
    setattr(user, k, parse_datetime(v))   File "build\bdist.win-amd64\egg\tweepy\utils.py", line 17, in parse_datetime
    date = datetime(*(time.strptime(string, '%a %b %d %H:%M:%S +0000 %Y')[0:6]))   File "C:\Python27\lib\_strptime.py", line 454, in _strptime_time
    return _strptime(data_string, format)[0]   File "C:\Python27\lib\_strptime.py", line 300, in _strptime
    _TimeRE_cache = TimeRE()   File "C:\Python27\lib\_strptime.py", line 188, in __init__
    self.locale_time = LocaleTime()   File "C:\Python27\lib\_strptime.py", line 77, in __init__
    raise ValueError("locale changed during initialization") ValueError: locale changed during initialization

The problem is with thread lock on, each thread runs itself serially basically, and it takes way to long for each loop to run for there to be any advantage to having a thread anymore. So if there isn't a way to get rid of the thread lock, is there a way to have it run the for loop inside of the try statement faster?