Search Results

Search found 1275 results on 51 pages for 'derived'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 10/51 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • Casting generics and the generic type

    - by Kragen
    Consider, I have the following 3 classes / interfaces: class MyClass<T> { } interface IMyInterface { } class Derived : IMyInterface { } And I want to be able to cast a MyClass<Derived> into a MyClass<IMyInterface> or visa-versa: MyClass<Derived> a = new MyClass<Derived>(); MyClass<IMyInterface> b = (MyClass<IMyInterface>)a; But I get compiler errors if I try: Cannot convert type 'MyClass<Derived>' to 'MyClass<IMyInterface>' I'm sure there is a very good reason why I cant do this, but I can't think of one. As for why I want to do this - The scenario I'm imagining is one whereby you ideally want to work with an instance of MyClass<Derived> in order to avoid lots of nasty casts, however you need to pass your instance to an interface that accepts MyClass<IMyInterface>. So my question is twofold: Why can I not cast between these two types? Is there any way of keeping the niceness of working with an instance of MyClass<Derived> while still being able to cast this into a MyClass<IMyInterface>?

    Read the article

  • variables in abstract classes C++

    - by wyatt
    I have an abstract class CommandPath, and a number of derived classes as below: class CommandPath { public: virtual CommandResponse handleCommand(std::string) = 0; virtual CommandResponse execute() = 0; virtual ~CommandPath() {} }; class GetTimeCommandPath : public CommandPath { int stage; public: GetTimeCommandPath() : stage(0) {} CommandResponse handleCommand(std::string); CommandResponse execute(); }; All of the derived classes have the member variable 'stage'. I want to build a function into all of them which manipulates 'stage' in the same way, so rather than defining it many times I thought I'd build it into the parent class. I moved 'stage' from the private sections of all of the derived classes into the protected section of CommandPath, and added the function as follows: class CommandPath { protected: int stage; public: virtual CommandResponse handleCommand(std::string) = 0; virtual CommandResponse execute() = 0; std::string confirmCommand(std::string, int, int, std::string, std::string); virtual ~CommandPath() {} }; class GetTimeCommandPath : public CommandPath { public: GetTimeCommandPath() : stage(0) {} CommandResponse handleCommand(std::string); CommandResponse execute(); }; Now my compiler tells me for the constructor lines that none of the derived classes have a member 'stage'. I was under the impression that protected members are visible to derived classes? The constructor is the same in all classes, so I suppose I could move it to the parent class, but I'm more concerned about finding out why the derived classes aren't able to access the variable. Also, since previously I've only used the parent class for pure virtual functions, I wanted to confirm that this is the way to go about adding a function to be inherited by all derived classes.

    Read the article

  • error: 'void Base::output()' is protected within this context

    - by Bill
    I'm confused about the errors generated by the following code. In Derived::doStuff, I can access Base::output directly by calling it. Why can't I create a pointer to output() in the same context that I can call output()? (I thought protected / private governed whether you could use a name in a specific context, but apparently that is incomplete?) Is my fix of writing callback(this, &Derived::output); instead of callback(this, Base::output) the correct solution? #include <iostream> using std::cout; using std::endl; template <typename T, typename U> void callback(T obj, U func) { ((obj)->*(func))(); } class Base { protected: void output() { cout << "Base::output" << endl; } }; class Derived : public Base { public: void doStuff() { // call it directly: output(); Base::output(); // create a pointer to it: // void (Base::*basePointer)() = &Base::output; // error: 'void Base::output()' is protected within this context void (Derived::*derivedPointer)() = &Derived::output; // call a function passing the pointer: // callback(this, &Base::output); // error: 'void Base::output()' is protected within this context callback(this, &Derived::output); } }; int main() { Derived d; d.doStuff(); }

    Read the article

  • c++ Multiple Inheritance - Compiler modifying my pointers

    - by Bob
    If I run the following code, I get different addresses printed. Why? class Base1 { int x; }; class Base2 { int y; }; class Derived : public Base1, public Base2 { }; union U { Base2* b; Derived* d; U(Base2* b2) : b(b) {} }; int main() { Derived* d = new Derived; cout << d << "\n"; cout << U(d).d << "\n"; return 0; } Even more fun is if you repeatedly go in and out of the union the address keeps incrementing by 4, like this int main() { Derived* d = new Derived; cout << d << "\n"; d = U(d).d; cout << d << "\n"; d = U(d).d; cout << d << "\n"; return 0; } If the union is modified like this, then the problem goes away union U { void* v; Base2* b; Derived* d; U(void* v) : v(v) {} }; Also, if either base class is made empty, the problem goes away. Is this a compiler bug? I want it to leave my pointers the hell alone.

    Read the article

  • How do you make a private member in the base class become a public member in the base class?

    - by jasonline
    Consider the following code: class Base { void f() { } }; class Derived: public Base { public: }; What can you change in the derived class, such that you can perform the following: Derived d; d.f(); If the member is declared as public in the base class, adding a using declaration for Base::f in the derived class public section would've fix the problem. But if it is declared as private in the base class, this doesn't seem to work.

    Read the article

  • how to avoid sub-query to gain performance

    - by chun
    hi i have a reporting query which have 2 long sub-query SELECT r1.code_centre, r1.libelle_centre, r1.id_equipe, r1.equipe, r1.id_file_attente, r1.libelle_file_attente,r1.id_date, r1.tranche, r1.id_granularite_de_periode,r1.granularite, r1.ContactsTraites, r1.ContactsenParcage, r1.ContactsenComm, r1.DureeTraitementContacts, r1.DureeComm, r1.DureeParcage, r2.AgentsConnectes, r2.DureeConnexion, r2.DureeTraitementAgents, r2.DureePostTraitement FROM ( SELECT cc.id_centre_contact, cc.code_centre, cc.libelle_centre, a.id_equipe, a.equipe, a.id_file_attente, f.libelle_file_attente, a.id_date, g.tranche, g.id_granularite_de_periode, g.granularite, sum(Nb_Contacts_Traites) as ContactsTraites, sum(Nb_Contacts_en_Parcage) as ContactsenParcage, sum(Nb_Contacts_en_Communication) as ContactsenComm, sum(Duree_Traitement/1000) as DureeTraitementContacts, sum(Duree_Communication / 1000 + Duree_Conference / 1000 + Duree_Com_Interagent / 1000) as DureeComm, sum(Duree_Parcage/1000) as DureeParcage FROM agr_synthese_activite_media_fa_agent a, centre_contact cc, direction_contact dc, granularite_de_periode g, media m, file_attente f WHERE m.id_media = a.id_media AND cc.id_centre_contact = a.id_centre_contact AND a.id_direction_contact = dc.id_direction_contact AND dc.direction_contact ='INCOMING' AND a.id_file_attente = f.id_file_attente AND m.media = 'PHONE' AND ( ( g.valeur_min = date_format(a.id_date,'%d/%m') and g.granularite = 'Jour') or ( g.granularite = 'Heure' and a.id_th_heure = g.id_granularite_de_periode) ) GROUP by cc.id_centre_contact, a.id_equipe, a.id_file_attente, a.id_date, g.tranche, g.id_granularite_de_periode) r1, ( (SELECT cc.id_centre_contact,cc.code_centre, cc.libelle_centre, a.id_equipe, a.equipe, a.id_date, g.tranche, g.id_granularite_de_periode,g.granularite, count(distinct a.id_agent) as AgentsConnectes, sum(Duree_Connexion / 1000) as DureeConnexion, sum(Duree_en_Traitement / 1000) as DureeTraitementAgents, sum(Duree_en_PostTraitement / 1000) as DureePostTraitement FROM activite_agent a, centre_contact cc, granularite_de_periode g WHERE ( g.valeur_min = date_format(a.id_date,'%d/%m') and g.granularite = 'Jour') AND cc.id_centre_contact = a.id_centre_contact GROUP BY cc.id_centre_contact, a.id_equipe, a.id_date, g.tranche, g.id_granularite_de_periode ) UNION (SELECT cc.id_centre_contact,cc.code_centre, cc.libelle_centre, a.id_equipe, a.equipe, a.id_date, g.tranche, g.id_granularite_de_periode,g.granularite, count(distinct a.id_agent) as AgentsConnectes, sum(Duree_Connexion / 1000) as DureeConnexion, sum(Duree_en_Traitement / 1000) as DureeTraitementAgents, sum(Duree_en_PostTraitement / 1000) as DureePostTraitement FROM activite_agent a, centre_contact cc, granularite_de_periode g WHERE ( g.granularite = 'Heure' AND a.id_th_heure = g.id_granularite_de_periode) AND cc.id_centre_contact = a.id_centre_contact GROUP BY cc.id_centre_contact,a.id_equipe, a.id_date, g.tranche, g.id_granularite_de_periode) ) r2 WHERE r1.id_centre_contact = r2.id_centre_contact AND r1.id_equipe = r2.id_equipe AND r1.id_date = r2.id_date AND r1.tranche = r2.tranche AND r1.id_granularite_de_periode = r2.id_granularite_de_periode GROUP BY r1.id_centre_contact , r1.id_equipe, r1.id_file_attente, r1.id_date, r1.tranche, r1.id_granularite_de_periode ORDER BY r1.code_centre, r1.libelle_centre, r1.equipe, r1.libelle_file_attente, r1.id_date, r1.id_granularite_de_periode,r1.tranche the EXPLAIN shows | id | select_type | table | type| possible_keys | key | key_len | ref| rows | Extra | '1', 'PRIMARY', '<derived3>', 'ALL', NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, '2520', 'Using temporary; Using filesort' '1', 'PRIMARY', '<derived2>', 'ALL', NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, '4378', 'Using where; Using join buffer' '3', 'DERIVED', 'a', 'ALL', 'fk_Activite_Agent_centre_contact', NULL, NULL, NULL, '83433', 'Using temporary; Using filesort' '3', 'DERIVED', 'g', 'ref', 'Index_granularite,Index_Valeur_min', 'Index_Valeur_min', '23', 'func', '1', 'Using where' '3', 'DERIVED', 'cc', 'ALL', 'PRIMARY', NULL, NULL, NULL, '6', 'Using where; Using join buffer' '4', 'UNION', 'g', 'ref', 'PRIMARY,Index_granularite', 'Index_granularite', '23', '', '24', 'Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort' '4', 'UNION', 'a', 'ref', 'fk_Activite_Agent_centre_contact,fk_activite_agent_TH_heure', 'fk_activite_agent_TH_heure', '5', 'reporting_acd.g.Id_Granularite_de_periode', '2979', 'Using where' '4', 'UNION', 'cc', 'ALL', 'PRIMARY', NULL, NULL, NULL, '6', 'Using where; Using join buffer' NULL, 'UNION RESULT', '<union3,4>', 'ALL', NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, '' '2', 'DERIVED', 'g', 'range', 'PRIMARY,Index_granularite,Index_Valeur_min', 'Index_granularite', '23', NULL, '389', 'Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort' '2', 'DERIVED', 'a', 'ALL', 'fk_agr_synthese_activite_media_fa_agent_centre_contact,fk_agr_synthese_activite_media_fa_agent_direction_contact,fk_agr_synthese_activite_media_fa_agent_file_attente,fk_agr_synthese_activite_media_fa_agent_media,fk_agr_synthese_activite_media_fa_agent_th_heure', NULL, NULL, NULL, '20903', 'Using where; Using join buffer' '2', 'DERIVED', 'cc', 'eq_ref', 'PRIMARY', 'PRIMARY', '4', 'reporting_acd.a.Id_Centre_Contact', '1', '' '2', 'DERIVED', 'f', 'eq_ref', 'PRIMARY', 'PRIMARY', '4', 'reporting_acd.a.Id_File_Attente', '1', '' '2', 'DERIVED', 'dc', 'eq_ref', 'PRIMARY', 'PRIMARY', '4', 'reporting_acd.a.Id_Direction_Contact', '1', 'Using where' '2', 'DERIVED', 'm', 'eq_ref', 'PRIMARY', 'PRIMARY', '4', 'reporting_acd.a.Id_Media', '1', 'Using where' don't know it very clear, but i think is the problem of seems it take full scaning than i change all the sub-query to views(create view as select sub-query), and the result is the same thanks for any advice

    Read the article

  • printing in the same line in java.

    - by sil3nt
    Hi there, I have a base class called Items and 3 derived classes, and within the Items base class i have a print function of the form public void print(){ System.out.println("ID " + id + " Title " + title + " <" + year + "> "); } and within every derived class I call the Items print function through super.print(); which is followed by a specific print function relating to the derived class. My problem is, whenever the printing is executed from one of the derived classes the printed text is not on the same line. So super.print() will be in the line above the derived class print function. How do I get them both to be on the same line?

    Read the article

  • Safe to cast pointer to a forward-declared class to its true base class in C++?

    - by Matt DiMeo
    In one header file I have: #include "BaseClass.h" // a forward declaration of DerivedClass, which extends class BaseClass. class DerivedClass ; class Foo { DerivedClass *derived ; void someMethod() { // this is the cast I'm worried about. ((BaseClass*)derived)->baseClassMethod() ; } }; Now, DerivedClass is (in its own header file) derived from BaseClass, but the compiler doesn't know that at the time it's reading the definition above for class Foo. However, Foo refers to DerivedClass pointers and DerivedClass refers to Foo pointers, so they can't both know each other's declaration. First question is whether it's safe (according to C++ spec, not in any given compiler) to cast a derived class pointer to its base class pointer type in the absence of a full definition of the derived class. Second question is whether there's a better approach. I'm aware I could move someMethod()'s body out of the class definition, but in this case it's important that it be inlined (part of an actual, measured hotspot - I'm not guessing).

    Read the article

  • Whats wrong with the following code, its not compiling

    - by Ganesh Kundapur
    #include <iostream> #include <vector> using namespace std; class Base { public: void Display( void ) { cout<<"Base display"<<endl; } int Display( int a ) { cout<<"Base int display"<<endl; return 0; } }; class Derived : public Base { public: void Display( void ) { cout<<"Derived display"<<endl; } }; void main() { Derived obj; obj.Display(); obj.Display( 10 ); } $test1.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: test1.cpp:35: error: no matching function for call to ‘Derived::Display(int)’ test1.cpp:24: note: candidates are: void Derived::Display() On commenting obj.Display(10), it works.

    Read the article

  • Figuring out what makes a C++ class abstract in VS2008

    - by suszterpatt
    I'm using VS2008 to build a plain old C++ program (not C++/CLI). I have an abstract base class and a non-abstract derived class, and building this: Base* obj; obj = new Derived(); fails with the error "'Derived': cannot instantiate abstract class". (It may be worth noting, however, that if I hover over Base with the cursor, VS will pop up a tooltip saying "class Base abstract", but hovering over Derived will only say "class Derived" (no "abstract")). The definitions of these classes are fairly large and I'd like to avoid manually checking if each method has been overridden. Can VS do this for me somehow? Any general tips on pinpointing the exact parts of the class' definition that make it abstract?

    Read the article

  • C++ Add this pointer to a container by calling it in base class constructor

    - by vivekeviv
    class Base { public: Base (int a, int b); private: int a,b; }; class Derived1 { public: Derived1():base(1,2){} }; similarly Derived2, Derived 3 which doesnt contain any data members on its own Now i need to contain these derived objects in a singleton, so i was thinking to call this in base constructor like Base::Base(int a, int b) { CBaseMgr::GetInstance()->AddtoVector(this); } so now if i construct Derived d1, d2, d3 etc. will the Singleton's container contain all derived objects? My doubt is can i do this adding of objects to container in base ctor or should i do in derived ctor.?

    Read the article

  • How to add custom-control-derived TabItem to TabControl in WPF?

    - by orloffm
    I want to have my own base TabItem class and use other classes that derive from it. I define base class in MyNs namespace like this: public class MyCustomTab : TabItem { static MyCustomTab() { DefaultStyleKeyProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(MyCustomTab), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(typeof(TabItem))); } } And this is what I do for the class that inherits from it: code-behind in MyNs namespace: public partial class ActualTab : MyCustomTab { public ActualTab() { InitializeComponent(); } } XAML: <MyCustomTab x:Class="MyNs.ActualTab" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"> <Grid> </Grid> </MyCustomTab> The error I get is "The tag 'MyCustomTab' does not exist in XML namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation'". If I use TabItem tag in XAML the error says that it's not possible to define to different base classes. How to fix this?

    Read the article

  • How do I hide an inherited __published property in the derived class in a VCL component?

    - by Gary Benade
    I have created a new VCL component based on an existing VCL component. What I want to do now is set the Password and Username properties from an ini file instead of the property inspector. Robert Dunn Link I read on the delphi forum above you cannot unpublish a property and that the only workaround is to redeclare the property as read-only. I tried this but it all it does is make the property read only and grayed out in the object inspector. While this could work I would prefer if the property wasn't visible at all. __property System::UnicodeString Password = {read=FPassword}; Thanks in advance for any help or links to c++ VCL component writing tutorials. I am using CB2010

    Read the article

  • Conversion of pointer-to-pointer between derived and base classes?

    - by Mike Mueller
    Regarding the following C++ program: class Base { }; class Child : public Base { }; int main() { // Normal: using child as base is allowed Child *c = new Child(); Base *b = c; // Double pointers: apparently can't use Child** as Base** Child **cc = &c; Base **bb = cc; return 0; } GCC produces the following error on the last assignment statement: error: invalid conversion from ‘Child**’ to ‘Base**’ My question is in two parts: Why is there no implicit conversion from Child** to Base**? I can make this example work with a C-style cast or a reinterpret_cast. Using these casts means throwing away all type safety. Is there anything I can add to the class definitions to make these pointers cast implicitly, or at least phrase the conversion in a way that allows me to use static_cast instead?

    Read the article

  • Polymorphism problem: How to check type of derived class?

    - by malymato
    Hi, this is my first question here :) I know that I should not check for object type but instead use dynamic_cast, but that would not solve my problem. I have class called Extension and interfaces called IExtendable and IInitializable, IUpdatable, ILoadable, IDrawable (the last four are basicly the same). If Extension implements IExtendable interface, it can extend itself with different Extension objects. The problem is that I want to allow the Extension which implements IExtendable to extend only with Extension that implements the same interfaces as the original Extension. You probably don't unerstand that mess so I try to explain it with code: class IExtendable { public: IExtendable(void); void AddExtension(Extension*); void RemoveExtensionByID(unsigned int); vector<Extension*>* GetExtensionPtr(){return &extensions;}; private: vector<Extension*> extensions; }; class IUpdatable { public: IUpdatable(void); ~IUpdatable(void); virtual void Update(); }; class Extension { public: Extension(void); virtual ~Extension(void); void Enable(){enabled=true;}; void Disable(){enabled=false;}; unsigned int GetIndex(){return ID;}; private: bool enabled; unsigned int ID; static unsigned int _indexID; }; Now imagine the case that I create Extension like this: class MyExtension : public Extension, public IExtendable, public IUpdatable, public IDrawable { public: MyExtension(void); virtual ~MyExtension(void); virtual void AddExtension(Extension*); virtual void Update(); virtual void Draw(); }; And I want to allow this class to extend itself only with Extensions that implements the same interfaces (or less). For example I want it to be able to take Extension which implements IUpdatable; or both IUpdatable and IDrawable; but e.g. not Extension which implements ILoadable. I want to do this because when e.g. Update() will be called on some Extension which implements IExtendable and IUpdateable, it will be also called on these Extensions which extends this Extension. So when I'm adding some Extension to Extension which implements IExtendable and some of the IUpdatable, ILoadable... I'm forced to check if Extension that is going to be add implements these interfaces too. So In the IExtendable::AddExtension(Extension*) I would need to do something like this: void IExtendable::AddExtension(Extension* pEx) { bool ok = true; // check wheather this extension can take pEx // do this with every interface if ((*pEx is IUpdatable) && (*this is_not IUpdatable)) ok = false; if (ok) this->extensions.push_back(pEx); } But how? Any ideas what would be the best solution? I don't want to use dynamic_cast and see if it returns null... thanks

    Read the article

  • How can I instantiate a base class and then convert it to a derived class?

    - by Eric
    I was wondering how to do this, consider the following classes public class Fruit { public string Name { get; set; } public Color Color { get; set; } } public class Apple : Fruit { public Apple() { } } How can I instantiate a new fruit but upcast to Apple, is there a way to instantiate a bunch of Fruit and make them apples with the name & color set. Do I need to manually deep copy? Of course this fails Fruit a = new Fruit(); a.Name = "FirstApple"; a.Color = Color.Red; Apple wa = a as Apple; System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print("Apple name: " + wa.Name); Do I need to pass in a Fruit to the AppleCTor and manually set the name and color( or 1-n properties) Is there an better design to do this?

    Read the article

  • How to implement Cocoa copyWithZone on derived object in MonoMac C#?

    - by Justin Aquadro
    I'm currently porting a small Winforms-based .NET application to use a native Mac front-end with MonoMac. The application has a TreeControl with icons and text, which does not exist out of the box in Cocoa. So far, I've ported almost all of the ImageAndTextCell code in Apple's DragNDrop example: https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#samplecode/DragNDropOutlineView/Listings/ImageAndTextCell_m.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40008831-ImageAndTextCell_m-DontLinkElementID_6, which is assigned to an NSOutlineView as a custom cell. It seems to be working almost perfectly, except that I have not figured out how to properly port the copyWithZone method. Unfortunately, this means the internal copies that NSOutlineView is making do not have the image field, and it leads to the images briefly vanishing during expand and collapse operations. The objective-c code in question is: - (id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone { ImageAndTextCell *cell = (ImageAndTextCell *)[super copyWithZone:zone]; // The image ivar will be directly copied; we need to retain or copy it. cell->image = [image retain]; return cell; } The first line is what's tripping me up, as MonoMac does not expose a copyWithZone method, and I don't know how to otherwise call it. Update Based on current answers and additional research and testing, I've come up with a variety of models for copying an object. static List<ImageAndTextCell> _refPool = new List<ImageAndTextCell>(); // Method 1 static IntPtr selRetain = Selector.GetHandle ("retain"); [Export("copyWithZone:")] public virtual NSObject CopyWithZone(IntPtr zone) { ImageAndTextCell cell = new ImageAndTextCell() { Title = Title, Image = Image, }; Messaging.void_objc_msgSend (cell.Handle, selRetain); return cell; } // Method 2 [Export("copyWithZone:")] public virtual NSObject CopyWithZone(IntPtr zone) { ImageAndTextCell cell = new ImageAndTextCell() { Title = Title, Image = Image, }; _refPool.Add(cell); return cell; } [Export("dealloc")] public void Dealloc () { _refPool.Remove(this); this.Dispose(); } // Method 3 static IntPtr selRetain = Selector.GetHandle ("retain"); [Export("copyWithZone:")] public virtual NSObject CopyWithZone(IntPtr zone) { ImageAndTextCell cell = new ImageAndTextCell() { Title = Title, Image = Image, }; _refPool.Add(cell); Messaging.void_objc_msgSend (cell.Handle, selRetain); return cell; } // Method 4 static IntPtr selRetain = Selector.GetHandle ("retain"); static IntPtr selRetainCount = Selector.GetHandle("retainCount"); [Export("copyWithZone:")] public virtual NSObject CopyWithZone (IntPtr zone) { ImageAndTextCell cell = new ImageAndTextCell () { Title = Title, Image = Image, }; _refPool.Add (cell); Messaging.void_objc_msgSend (cell.Handle, selRetain); return cell; } public void PeriodicCleanup () { List<ImageAndTextCell> markedForDelete = new List<ImageAndTextCell> (); foreach (ImageAndTextCell cell in _refPool) { uint count = Messaging.UInt32_objc_msgSend (cell.Handle, selRetainCount); if (count == 1) markedForDelete.Add (cell); } foreach (ImageAndTextCell cell in markedForDelete) { _refPool.Remove (cell); cell.Dispose (); } } // Method 5 static IntPtr selCopyWithZone = Selector.GetHandle("copyWithZone:"); [Export("copyWithZone:")] public virtual NSObject CopyWithZone(IntPtr zone) { IntPtr copyHandle = Messaging.IntPtr_objc_msgSendSuper_IntPtr(SuperHandle, selCopyWithZone, zone); ImageAndTextCell cell = new ImageAndTextCell(copyHandle) { Image = Image, }; _refPool.Add(cell); return cell; } Method 1: Increases the retain count of the unmanaged object. The unmanaged object will persist persist forever (I think? dealloc never called), and the managed object will be harvested early. Seems to be lose-lose all-around, but runs in practice. Method 2: Saves a reference of the managed object. The unmanaged object is left alone, and dealloc appears to be invoked at a reasonable time by the caller. At this point the managed object is released and disposed. This seems reasonable, but on the downside the base type's dealloc won't be run (I think?) Method 3: Increases the retain count and saves a reference. Unmanaged and managed objects leak forever. Method 4: Extends Method 3 by adding a cleanup function that is run periodically (e.g. during Init of each new ImageAndTextCell object). The cleanup function checks the retain counts of the stored objects. A retain count of 1 means the caller has released it, so we should as well. Should eliminate leaking in theory. Method 5: Attempt to invoke the copyWithZone method on the base type, and then construct a new ImageAndTextView object with the resulting handle. Seems to do the right thing (the base data is cloned). Internally, NSObject bumps the retain count on objects constructed like this, so we also use the PeriodicCleanup function to release these objects when they're no longer used. Based on the above, I believe Method 5 is the best approach since it should be the only one that results in a truly correct copy of the base type data, but I don't know if the approach is inherently dangerous (I am also making some assumptions about the underlying implementation of NSObject). So far nothing bad has happened "yet", but if anyone is able to vet my analysis then I would be more confident going forward.

    Read the article

  • What is lifetime of lambda-derived implicit functors in C++ ?

    - by Fyodor Soikin
    The question is simple: what is lifetime of that functor object that is automatically generated for me by the C++ compiler when I write a lambda-expression? I did a quick search, but couldn't find a satisfactory answer. In particular, if I pass the lambda somewhere, and it gets remembered there, and then I go out of scope, what's going to happen once my lambda is called later and tries to access my stack-allocated, but no longer alive, captured variables? Or does the compiler prevent such situation in some way? Or what?

    Read the article

  • Why my custom CStatic derived control does not receive WM_SIZE message?

    - by Michael P
    Hello everyone! I'm currently developing a custom control that derives from CStatic MFC class (Smart Device C++ project). I have created the control class using VC++ MFC class wizard, selecting CStatic class as its base class. I have used Class View to add OnSize event handler for my control class (I have selected WM_SIZE message from messages list), and new OnSize method has been created by Visual Studio along with ON_WM_SIZE() statement between BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(...) and END_MESSAGE_MAP(). The problem is that my control does not receive WM_SIZE thus OnSize method is never called - I used MoveWindow to change size of my control - its size changes as I have seen on dialog window but WM_SIZE message is never being sent. When I send WM_SIZE through SendMessage or PostMessage function - the control OnSize method is called normally. What do I wrong? I've read MSDN docs about CStatic control and there is no information that WM_SIZE message is never sent to a static control window. Sorry for my bad English.

    Read the article

  • Customizing the behavior of ControlDesigners for Controls derived from native .NET controls.

    - by Eric
    My question is related to this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/93541/baseline-snaplines-in-custom-winforms-controls However, in my case, I have created a new control that derives from TextBox rather than containing a TextBox. I would like to have a custom ControlDesigner, but I would like to modify the behavior of the TextBox's designer rather than having to write a complete designer myself. In particular, I'd like to be able to return the TextBox's SnapLines while providing some custom verbs. Is there a good way to do this? EDIT: To clarify, this is for Windows Forms in .NET 2.0.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >