Search Results

Search found 34060 results on 1363 pages for 'ubuntu font family'.

Page 10/1363 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

• Ubuntu Touch Official Hardware? [duplicate]

  - by user1628

  This question already has an answer here: Where can I get a device with 'Ubuntu for phones' pre-installed? 1 answer I really like the look of Ubuntu touch and I want it ASAP, however, I am NOT willing to buy a device simply to port ubuntu touch on it. I don't want to void all warranties and take any risks. Therefore, I am really just waiting for official ubuntu touch hardware (devices made for ubuntu touch). I can't find any rumours or estimated release dates online, in fact, I can't find out anything at all. Can anyone? If so, what and where? When do you think they'll be official hardware? What price do you think it'll be? Do you think canonical/ubuntu will manufacture it themselves? Thanks, Zach

  Read the article

• Ubuntu 12.04 LTS vs Ubuntu 14.04 LTS memory usage

  - by geoffroy

  My droplet has 512 MB memory and is running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS 64 bits and a Rails 4 application + several workers. It's running well. I tried to deploy the same thing on a Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64 bits droplet and I've got plenty of memory related problem (can't fork). Is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS using way more RAM than Ubuntu 12.04 LTS? Is there something I should know to lower memory usage ? Should I stick with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS?

  Read the article

• Antialias not working in ubuntu lucid lynx 10.04

  - by mac

  I have recently upgraded from karmic to lucid (plain ubuntu using gnome). Everything worked fine, but the characters now aren't anti-aliased any more, as you can appreciate from the screenshot: This is what I tried to fix the situation, unluckily without succeeding: Used the regular option pane from System-Preference-Appearance-Font (smoothing, hinting...) Edited the .fonts.conf file Disinstalling (and then re-installing) the mstcorefont package Changing the default Sans font to a font of my liking (e.g. Tahoma) from the abovementioned Appearance options My ubuntu installation is quite standard, with the typical add-ons one might wish for usability. I used the ubuntu start script to make a few tweaks. Thank you in advance for your help! :)

  Read the article

• Definitive method for sizing font in css

  - by David

  Hi there, I would like to know some opinions from experienced developers on what they think the definitive way to size fonts (in a base sense). I know that working with ems is considered best but im referring to the best way to set the base font size. There is the technique of setting font to 10px using 62.5 method but i think ie has an issue with rounding which throws this out slightly (perhaps not) YUI framework uses body { font:13px/1.231 arial,helvetica,clean,sans-serif; /* for IE6/7 */ *font-size:small; /* for IE Quirks Mode */ *font:x-small; } which really confuses me! Tripoli uses html { font-size:125%; } body { font-size:50%; } a list apart suggest something along the lines of : body { font-size: 16px; *font-size: 100%; } So which is the best either out of these methods or any alternatives. The best being the easiest to work with and the most reliable cross browser.

  Read the article

• installing a new font = "does not appear to be valid font"

  - by Jake

  I have purchased and correctly installed it on one computer. I then emailed that font in a zip file to be installed on another machine using Windows 7. When I open the font and click the install button, it gives me the following error message: The file name "C:\Use...\charlottesanscom-book (2).ttf" does not appear to be a valid font Do you have step-by-step instructions on how to fix this problem?

  Read the article

• Ubuntu 9.10 desktop installation via USB (boot)

  - by user277980

  I have made a live boot USB using the UnetBootIn tool for Ubuntu 9.10. I have Windows XP SP2 installed as the primary OS, and I want to make a partition for Ubuntu. But when I try to boot it via USB, it just goes to boot menu of Ubuntu, then I enter the default type for installation. After that nothing happens, just the Ubuntu logo shows up and just that nothing happens after that. I can try the simpler task also i.e. install via CD but I want to know what's not working with this USB boot method. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Irc server for ubuntu

  - by Ralphz

  The Ubuntu WIKI https://help.ubuntu.com/community/IrcServer it lists few IRC servers you can use in Ubuntu. My question is which one is you favorite one and more secure. I will also need one that will allow me to monitor rooms for regular expressions and run some scripts if regexp matches. Thanks

  Read the article

• HT Link Sync Error after Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Installation

  - by marklab

  Update 1 I just assembled an exact replica of this server, and successfully installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS in a RAID10 configuration. The success was confirmed by a login to the initial account. There must be a hardware component that is faulty. Since the error mentions HT, which I believe to be Hyper Threading, I will start with the CPUs. Please indicate if this error is more strongly associated with any other piece of hardware. Or make a recommendation of another approach that would be good for this issue. Issue I was attempting to install Ubuntu 10.04 LTS on this system with the board RAID10 configured. However, the installation failed at the partitioning stage by rebooting the system. Upon reboot, there is an error report after POST listing the following: Node0: NB WatchDog Timer Error Node1: HT Link Sync Error Node2: HT Link Sync Error ... Node7: HT Link Sync Error Press F1 to continue/resume. After pressing F1 the system will boot from the Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installation disc. However, it will fail at the same stage, and go through the same process from there. Hardware CPU: AMD OPTERON X12 6172 G34 2.1G 18MB Motherboard: Supermicro H8QG6-F HDD: WD Caviar Green 2TB 5.4K RPM Troubleshooting I disabled RAID10 on the system, and installed the Ubuntu on a single drive. It installed successfully. I then went back to a RAID10 setup and attempted to install on the system again, and was able to make it through the partitioning stage. However, upon reboot, the system reported: Error: file not found, and then booted me into the Grub Rescue console. I feel I have aggravated the problem at this point because when I attempted to install from the boot disc again, the system reboots upon hitting enter to even start the installation process. It does the same thing when trying to boot from an Ubuntu 11 disc. I have not been able to find any information on this HT Link Sync Error, which I feel may have started the problems I am experiencing now with the installation of the OS. I am also aware that Ubuntu is said not to be supported by the motherboard according to Supermicro's site. However, since I was able to install it successfully on a single drive, I do not believe it is incompatible. I would like to know a reason for why it's failing to install on/off.

  Read the article

• Enable ubuntu 9.10 root login

  - by coderex

  how to enable root login in ubuntu 9.10

  Read the article

• use ubuntu server 10.4 as a virtulization server as esx from VMWare

  - by hitham

  i was wondering if its possible to use Ubuntu server as virtualization center as esxi vmware i am asking this coz i read this in ubuntu website: " Ubuntu includes a Virtual Machine Builder which makes this process simple and replicable allowing multiple pre-configured machines to be deployed instantly ". if its possible how can i do such thing ?. with all respect . Hitham Melhem

  Read the article

• Error activating XKB configuration (Ubuntu 9.10)?

  - by Mohammad

  I'm absolutely new on Ubuntu. I was gonna learn Ubuntu, so I installed VMware 7.0.1 build-227600 on my Win7 x64, afterward I've installed Ubuntu 9.10 on it as a Virtual Machine. I just enabled root account, and when I log in as root for once, I received the following error : What's wrong with it? Am I miss something?

  Read the article

• Use ubuntu server 10.04 as a virtulization server as esxi from VMWare

  - by hitham

  I was wondering if its possible to use Ubuntu server as virtualization center as ESXi Vmware? I am asking this coz i read this in ubuntu website: "Ubuntu includes a Virtual Machine Builder which makes this process simple and replicable allowing multiple pre-configured machines to be deployed instantly". If its possible how can i do such thing?. with all respect. Hitham Melhem

  Read the article

• CouchDB 0.11 on Ubuntu 10.04

  - by ShenoudaB

  Dears, i have successfully installed CouchDB 0.11 on Ubuntu 10.04 based on the Installation instruction in couchdb wiki for ubuntu 10.04. with appending " --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc" in ./configure and CouchDB Running successfully and got " {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"0.11.0"}" But the Test Suite is not running successfully, with being freeze in the first task "basic". any support to solve that and making the Test Suite running smoothly on Ubuntu 10.04.

  Read the article

• Sync Iphone in Windows XP running as Virtualbox guest under Ubuntu 9.10

  - by steveth45

  I run (K)Ubuntu 9.10 as my main operating system, but I still have a valid XP license, so I've been running Windows XP as a guest operating system with Virtualbox 3.10. I cannot get Itunes (running under Windows XP) to detect the presence of my Iphone. I found this link: http://blog.rootshell.be/2009/01/15/iphone-itunes-virtualbox/ which explains how to get this Itunes-in-XP-in-Virtualbox-under-Ubuntu configuration to work, but it involves editing the file /etc/init.d/mountdevsubfs.sh which apparently does not exist in Ubuntu 9.10. Does anyone know how get Itunes in XP running as a guest in Ubuntu 9.10 to detect and sync with an Iphone?

  Read the article

• Uninstall Perl 5.10 and Install 5.8 on Ubuntu 10.04

  - by user48848

  I was using Ubuntu 8.04 with installed Perl 5.8.8. I had installed Bugzilla 3.4.4 with some custom scripts and it was working fine. I had to upgrade Ubuntu from 8.04 to 10.04 and automatically Perl is also upgraded from Perl 5.8 to 5.10. Now, accessing Bugzilla displays an error message related to Perl module. While trying to run checksetup.pl, I am getting the following error message: root@cvsnew:/var/www/bugzilla-3.4# perl checksetup.pl * This is Bugzilla 3.4.3 on perl 5.10.1 * Running on Linux 2.6.32-24-generic-pae #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 07:39:26 UTC 2010 Checking perl modules... Checking for CGI.pm (v3.33) ok: found v3.48 perl: symbol lookup error: lib/i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi/auto/Digest/SHA/SHA.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Tstack_sp_ptr Accessing Bugzilla throws : "500 Internal Server Error". I explored this issue and found that this issue has come up because upgrading Ubuntu upgrades Perl 5.8 to 5.10 automatically. It seems like Perl 5.10.1 isn't binary compatible with the previous. Now, I want to uninstall Perl 5.10.1 and Install Perl 5.8.8 on my Ubuntu 10.04 box. I will appreciate if someone has already done that or share the required steps/commands to do it.

  Read the article

• Ubuntu server or Debian server (to run C++ apps developed on Ubuntu)

  - by skyeagle

  I have written a number of C++ server side daemons for my website, using my Ubuntu 9.10 dev machine. The C++ apps I mentioned above are "GUI-less" daemons (and libraries used by the daemons). I am now about to host my website and need to decide whether to go with Debian server or Ubuntu server. In a nutshell, here is the situation: I developed on Ubuntu desktop because I preferred the more friendly GUI I would like to deploy on Debian Server because of the (perceived?) robustness of the Debian server over Ubuntu server (I may be totally wrong here - and in fact, this is really what this question is all about) If Debian server is indeed more robust than Ubuntu server, then I have no choice but to go with Debian server - BUT, will my Ubuntu developed C++ apps run on the server? (or do I need to recompile them on the server? (I'd HATE to have to do this, because I want to keep the server machine clean and light - no GUI, no dev tools etc). This last question is really about binary compatability between Ubuntu and Debian. I want the server to be robust, secure and stable, and simply act as a server (i.e. LAMP and very little else - no GUI etc). Given that requirement, and the fact that I need to run my C++ apps (developed on Ubuntu 9.10), I need advice on which OS to choose for the server. Ideally, any advice will be backed with a reason. I am particularly interested in hearing from people who have been in an identical situation, or done something similar.

  Read the article

• Change font size for "Default Paragraph Font" in Word

  - by Richard Gadsden

  I have a document where the built-in style "Default Paragraph Font" has been set to a particular size. It shouldn't have a size - it should be inheriting from the paragraph style (that's the whole point of the style). If I go through the user interface, I can't modify this style (the modify button / dropdown is greyed out) While I can work around this in most places, it creates problems for the Table of Contents in particular, as that is forced to be in this style and it overrides the font size from the styles like TOC 1 (etc). I can set the font size through VBA - ActiveDocument.Styles("Default Paragraph Font").Font.size = 10 sets it to ten point, but I can't work out how to reset it back to inherit. At the moment, my table of contents is set to be all in the same size, but really TOC 1 should be bigger than TOC 2. Does anyone have any suggestions for how to fix this? One approach is to use the organizer to copy over the style from a working document, but ideally I'd like a way to resolve the problem without doing that - especially as that's not an easy approach to automate.

  Read the article

• Default /etc/apt/sources.list?

  - by piemesons

  I need default source list for ubuntu 10.04. Can anybody help me? Here is Mine:--- Ubuntu supported packages deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse Canonical Commercial Repository deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner medibuntu deb http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free deb-src http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free PlayOnLinux deb http://deb.playonlinux.com/ lucid main opera deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ lenny non-free google deb http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/ stable non-free main Dropbox Official Source deb http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu karmic main Skype deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free This is the error i am getting:-- (sudo apt-get update) Get:9 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [1,076B] Err http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages 404 Not Found Get:10 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [735B] and finally :-- Fetched 9,724B in 3s (2,645B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bisig/ppa/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

  Read the article

• PPA causing 404 error?

  - by piemesons

  I need default source list for ubuntu 10.04. Can anybody help me? Here is Mine:--- Ubuntu supported packages deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid-updates main restricted multiverse universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed main restricted universe multiverse Canonical Commercial Repository deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-backports partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-updates partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-security partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid-proposed partner medibuntu deb http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free deb-src http://packages.medibuntu.org/ lucid free non-free PlayOnLinux deb http://deb.playonlinux.com/ lucid main opera deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ lenny non-free google deb http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/ stable non-free main Dropbox Official Source deb http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu karmic main Skype deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free This is the error i am getting:-- (sudo apt-get update) Get:9 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [1,076B] Err http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages 404 Not Found Get:10 http://dl.google.com stable/main Packages [735B] and finally :-- Fetched 9,724B in 3s (2,645B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/bisig/ppa/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

  Read the article

• Easy BCD Help: Dual boot Win7 and Ubuntu 11.10 -- "Add new Entry" for Ubuntu

  - by Bradley Peterson

  I first had Ubuntu 11.10 installed on a single partition on my 750GB hard drive. I then partitioned the hard drive to 500GB (for Ubuntu) in ext4 format (what it already was from the clean install of Ubuntu)....and 250GB for Win7 in NFTS format. Then I installed Win7 onto that 250GB partition. Installation went smoothly and I was successfully booted into Win7 and setting everything up. After I was done doing all the stupid updates from Microsof, I thought I was done and I wanted to go back to Ubuntu. This is where the problem starts Of course I reboot and it goes directly to Win7. I research and find that Win7 has overwritten the Ubuntu bootloader, etc etc.. I don't fully understand it. I download EasyBCD 2.1.2 In EasyBCD, I select "Add New Entry" and select "Linux/BSD" and change the type to "GRUB 2" and name it "Ubuntu" Next, I go to "BCD Deployment" and select "Install the Windows Vista/7 bootloader to the MBR" and click "Write MBR" I reboot, select "Ubuntu" and the purple screen comes up, but NOTHING HAPPENS. If I hit Ctrl+Alt+Del, it goes to the Login menu where it acts normal for about 10-15 seconds, then freezes. It does this repeatedly every time. MY QUESTION: What's wrong here? Why can't I load Ubuntu now? Am I going to have to reinstall Ubuntu with Windows, then set up the bootloader with EasyBCD instead of Ubuntu, THEN Win7? Any and all help is appreciated! -Brad

  Read the article

• How to Customize the Ubuntu Bootloader Screen

  - by Omar Hafiz

  We all know Grub2 is the default bootloader for Ubuntu, but it isn’t the prettiest bootloader ever. Since we also know that Ubuntu is highly customizable, this week we’re going to show you how to beautify your bootloader. To accomplish this, we’re going to utilize an add-on called BURG, which is a Brand-new Universal loadeR based on Grub and is created by Bean. It has much prettier GUI and it supports themes and customizations. Latest Features How-To Geek ETC Macs Don’t Make You Creative! So Why Do Artists Really Love Apple? MacX DVD Ripper Pro is Free for How-To Geek Readers (Time Limited!) HTG Explains: What’s a Solid State Drive and What Do I Need to Know? How to Get Amazing Color from Photos in Photoshop, GIMP, and Paint.NET Learn To Adjust Contrast Like a Pro in Photoshop, GIMP, and Paint.NET Have You Ever Wondered How Your Operating System Got Its Name? Lakeside Sunset in the Mountains [Wallpaper] Taskbar Meters Turn Your Taskbar into a System Resource Monitor Create Shortcuts for Your Favorite or Most Used Folders in Ubuntu Create Custom Sized Thumbnail Images with Simple Image Resizer [Cross-Platform] Etch a Circuit Board using a Simple Homemade Mixture Sync Blocker Stops iTunes from Automatically Syncing

  Read the article

• Multiple computers on Ubuntu One

  - by L R Bellmore Jr

  I have added files from 4 computers to Ubuntu One. One computer failed. What happens to the files that I uploaded. Are they still on Ubuntu One? How come when I upload a file from computer A, computer B with the same Ubuntu One account does not sync and load that file into computer B - That has created this question.. what happens to files from computers from which I uploaded documents when those computers are no longer active or failed, or no longer have Ubuntu One on that computer from which the files were uploaded... Have I lost the files? The followup question is how come files from Computer A uploaded to Ubuntu One don't sync to Computer B. That is a related question. I need to shut down a computer, reformat the hard drive and install Linux on the entire harddrive instead of a dual boot with Windows XP as I am going to use Virtual Machines instead.. what happens to the files from the Windows Dual Boot that were uploaded to Ubuntu One? Are they removed from Ubuntu One and then have I lost those files if I don't backup to another service first.

  Read the article

• Ubuntu.sh on Android Phone

  - by pjtatlow

  So today I noticed something weird on my phone. I used a terminal emulator to see what I could do with it, and noticed that there is a file called ubuntu.sh. I tried to run it and got all sorts of permission denied errors, and then I decided to root my phone. But now I'm nervous to run it, does anyone know what it does or why it is there? edit I forgot to mention that I have an AT&T Morotola Atrix 4G running Android 2.3.6. Also when I use the app SSHDroid to go into my phone from my Ubuntu machine, I'm greeted with this: "The programs included with the Ubuntu system are free software; the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the individual files in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright. Ubuntu comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law. To access official Ubuntu documentation, please visit: http://help.ubuntu.com/" Also, here are the contents of ubuntu.sh #!/bin/sh export PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib # make sure no left-over pidfiles, etc. ####################################### rm -fr /var/run/* rm -fr /var/lock/* chmod 666 /system/usr/keychars/* rm -f /tmp/tab* mkdir -p /home/adas/Desktop chmod 755 /home/adas/Desktop chown -R adas.adas /home/adas/Desktop [ -x /usr/bin/firefox-install-profile ] && /usr/bin/firefox-install-profile [ -x /usr/local/bin/check-citrix-certs.sh ] && /usr/local/bin/check-citrix-certs.sh [ -x /usr/bin/migrate-webapps ] && /usr/bin/migrate-webapps # boot scripts ############## /etc/init.d/rc S # lock down /var for CTS ######################## chown root.adas /var/tmp chown root.adas /var/lock chmod 775 /var/tmp chmod 775 /var/lock chmod 666 /dev/socket/dbus chmod 666 /dev/null # runlevel 2 scripts #################### /etc/init.d/rc 2 cp /sdcard/*.lic /data/ chmod 666 /data/*.lic This is really strange, any ideas?

  Read the article

• Dual boot Ubuntu and Windows 7, I Can only boot ubuntu through recovery mode

  - by Alec

  I want to become a new user of Ubuntu, however this problem is preventing me. I have/had Window 7 professional on my computer. I recently looked into getting linux. I discovered dual-booting and decided to give it a try. First I created a bootable flash drive with ubuntu 12.10 64 bit. I then followed the instructions on: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WindowsDualBoot after I finished going through the setup, my computer rebooted. After the reboot I was able to select Ubuntu, advanced options for Ubuntu, 2 memory tests, and windows 7 (loader). So I chose Windows ( honestly i was more concerned that i still had everything on windows at this point). I then rebooted again and selected Ubuntu. When i selected Ubuntu, the background screen of Grub (the crimson/burgandy color) stayed for a few seconds then the screen went black: video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kKcG4sT7Lg&feature=plcp I tried again with the same results. so i redid the ubuntu install differently using http://www.liberiangeek.net/2012/10/dual-booting-windows-7-and-ubuntu-12-10-quantal-quetzal/. After rebooting the same thing happened. After that i was stumped, so i figured it could hurt to experiment. after all i backed up my windows 7 stuff, and i have the software disk. I tried booting in recovery mode under "advanced options for Ubuntu" and sure enough, after selecting continue to normal reboot it worked. So i updated and everything but when i rebooted it still wouldn't boot under Ubuntu. It would always boot after recovery mode. So i try installing 12.10 32 bit Ubuntu. the same problem keeps happening. I can still get to Ubuntu through recovery mode. so i went online and tried using the terminal (in ubuntu that i booted through recovery mode) when i was using it i discovered that "Error in sitecustomize; set PYTHONVERBOSE for traceback: EOFError: EOF read where not expected" kept showing up. also i noticed a notification in the top right corner that looked like a do not enter sign. it said "an error occured, please run package manager from the right-click menu or apt-get in a terminal to see what is wrong. the error message was: 'ror in sitecustomize;set PYTHONVERBOSE for traceback: EOFError: EOF read where not expected traceback (most recent called last): File "/usr/bin/lsb_release EOFError: EOF read where not expected 39;0' this usually means that your installed packages have unmet dependencies" Naturally i assumed this was what was causing my boot problems. I downloaded synaptic and updated everything and the error went away. but my boot problem was still a problem. so i go online find some things that have worked for others, like this Try to do this (in your terminal: sudo nano /etc/default/grub Look for: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash" Change it too : GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet" And update Grub: sudo update-grub This should fix stuff.) I did this and i still have the problem. sorry for the excessive explanation, please help.

  Read the article

• Lenovo Ideapad 205 and Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

  - by Oranges

  I just wanted to report one thing, because I know there are a lot of Ideapad S205 users out there, that had issues running Ubuntu on their Lenovo Ideapad S205 in the past. Lenovo Ideapad with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS: Everything works out of the box. I just installed it and everything, including the microphone, the webcam, the WLAN, the AMD E-350 CPU/GPU and the sound worked right away. In other words: Everything works. Even the AMD E-350 GPU works very well with the Open Source drivers and with the prop. drivers. The prop. drivers were automatically offered to me via Ubuntu itself. It works great. A long idea, written short: I love it. It's extremly stable and very fast. I am using the German version of the Idepad S205, combined with the 32bit version of Ubuntu. There is only one, single thing to keep in mind when installing Ubuntu on the S205: Plugin your USB/CD/DVD drive in the left USB-Port. I don't know why, but it only works with the USB-Port on the left side of the Netbook. This is only for installing Ubuntu. After it has been installed and updated successfully, all of the USB ports will work. Oranges - feedback on Lenovo S205 with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >