Search Results

Search found 4793 results on 192 pages for 'protected'.

Page 104/192 | < Previous Page | 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111  | Next Page >

  • Why is always MasterName blank in OnActionExecuted?

    - by devzero
    I'm trying to get the master page changed for all my aspx pages. For some reason I'm unable to detect when this function is called for a ascx page instead. Any help in correting this would be appreciated. protected override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext) { var action = filterContext.Result as ViewResult; if (action != null && action.MasterName != "" && Request.IsAjaxRequest()) { action.MasterName = "Ajax"; } base.OnActionExecuted(filterContext); }

    Read the article

  • Gridview adding row dynamically on RowDataBound with the same RowState (Alternate or Normal)

    - by rob waminal
    I am adding rows dynamically on code behind depending on the Row currently bounded on RowDataBound event. I want that added row to be the same state (Alternate or Normal) of the currently bounded row is this possible? I'm doing something like this but it doesn't follow what I want. I'm expecting the added row dynamically would be the same as the current row. But it is not. protected void gv_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e) { if(e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow) { GVData data = e.Row.DataItem as GVData; // not original object just for brevity if(data.AddHiddenRow) { // the row state here should be the same as the current GridViewRow tr = new GridViewRow(e.Row.RowIndex +1, e.Row.RowIndex + 1, DataControlRowType.DataRow, e.Row.RowState); TableCell newTableCell = new TableCell(); newTableCell.Style.Add("display", "none"); tr.Cells.Add(newTableCell); ((Table)e.Row.Parent).Rows.Add(tr); } } }

    Read the article

  • Why does my ASP.NET user control's field value reset to 0?

    - by Innogetics
    In the code below, why does the groupId value reset to 0 during Page_Load event? Maybe perhaps the AccountGrid created with groupId 1 is not the one that is loaded to the page? public partial class AccountGrid : System.Web.UI.UserControl { int groupId = 0; public AccountGrid() { } // an aspx page creates AccountGrid with "new AccountGrid(1)" public AccountGrid(int groupId) { this.groupId = groupId; } protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { DataAccessFacade facade = new DataAccessFacade(); // groupId resets to 0 here... grdAccount.DataSource = facade.GetAccountsByAccountGroupId(this.groupId); grdAccount.DataBind(); } } In my page, I have public partial class Default : System.Web.UI.Page { public Default() { } public void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { ctlAccountGrid = new Views.Controls.Account.AccountGrid(1); // should I do databind? ctlAccountGrid.DataBind(); } }

    Read the article

  • Deep Copy using Reflection in an Extension Method for Silverlight?

    - by didibus
    So I'm trying to find a generic extension method that creates a deep copy of an object using reflection, that would work in Silverlight. Deep copy using serialization is not so great in Silverlight, since it runs in partial trust and the BinaryFormatter does not exist. I also know that reflection would be faster then serialization for cloning. It would be nice to have a method that works to copy public, private and protected fields, and is recursive so that it can copy objects in objects, and that would also be able to handle collections, arrays, etc. I have searched online, and can only find shallow copy implementations using reflection. I don't understand why, since you can just use MemberwiseClone, so to me, those implementations are useless. Thank You.

    Read the article

  • Operator Overloading for Queue C++

    - by Josh
    I was trying to use the overload operator method to copy the entries of one queue into another, but I am going wrong with my function. I don't know how else to access the values of the queue "original" any other way than what I have below: struct Node { int item; Node* next; }; class Queue { public: [...] //Extra code here void operator = (const Queue &original); protected: Node *front, *end; } void Queue::operator=(const Queue &original) { //THIS IS WHERE IM GOING WRONG while(original.front->next != NULL) { front->item = original.front->item; front->next = new Node; front = front->next; original.front = original.front->next; } }

    Read the article

  • How to set attribs in GWT?

    - by Jonas Byström
    I'm not getting any effect out of DOM.setElementAttribute, am I doing something wrong? class MyListBox extends com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.ListBox { .... protected void setHoverAutoWidth() { addDomHandler(new MouseOverHandler() { public void onMouseOver(MouseOverEvent event) { DOM.setElementAttribute(getElement(), "width", "auto"); } }, MouseOverEvent.getType()); addDomHandler(new BlurHandler(){ public void onBlur(BlurEvent event) { DOM.setElementAttribute(getElement(), "width", "100px"); } }, BlurEvent.getType()); } } (I know there are less hacky ways to change the width than to set the style attribute directly, but I don't care about css right now.) Edit: Oops, just realized that width does not change the style width, just adds a width attribute to the tag (which explains why nothing happens). Any suggestions on how to modify the style are still welcome!

    Read the article

  • What is the benefits and drawbacks of using header files?

    - by vodkhang
    I had some experience on programming languages like Java, C#, Scala as well as some lower level programming language like C, C++, Objective - C. My observation is that low level languages separate out header files and implementation files while other higher level programming language never separate it out. They use some identifiers like public, private, protected to do the jobs of header files. I saw one benefit of using header file (in some book like Code Complete), they talk about that using header files, people can never look at our implementation file and it helps with encapsulation. A drawback is that it creates too many files for me. Sometimes, it looks like verbose. It is just my thought and I don't know if there are any other benefits and drawbacks that people ever see and work with header file This question may not relate directly to programming but I think that if I can understand better about programming to interface, design software.

    Read the article

  • System.Threading.Timer example to run and display seconds until you click a button

    - by Roy
    Hi, I am having some issues creating an asp.net page using C# When you first click a button it starts the display of seconds via a label control. When you click the button again the seconds stop. Currently my code behind looks like this: System.Threading.Timer Timer; bool endProcess = false; int i = 0; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { Timer = new System.Threading.Timer(TimerCallback, null, 10, 10); } private void TimerCallback(object state) { Label1.Text = i.ToString(); i++; if (endProcess == true) { Timer.Dispose(); return; } } public void Button1_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e) { endProcess = true; }

    Read the article

  • Is Graphics.DrawImage asynchronous?

    - by Roy
    Hi all, I was just wondering, is Graphics.DrawImage() asynchronous? I'm struggling with a thread safety issue and can't figure out where the problem is. if i use the following code in the GUI thread: protected override void OnPaint(PaintEventArgs e) { lock (_bitmapSyncRoot) { e.Graphics.DrawImage(_bitmap, _xPos, _yPos); } } And have the following code in a separate thread: private void RedrawBitmapThread() { Bitmap newBitmap = new Bitmap(_width, _height); // Draw bitmap // Bitmap oldBitmap = null; lock (_bitmapSyncRoot) { oldBitmap = _bitmap; _bitmap = newBitmap; } if (oldBitmap != null) { oldBitmap.Dispose(); } Invoke(Invalidate); } Could that explain an accessviolation exception? The code is running on a windows mobile 6.1 device with compact framework 3.5.

    Read the article

  • Simple question C#.net about if else statement

    - by ilkdrl
    Iam doing a simple website and when i press button, i should see weight in label.. i see but if text.maxlenght 6, i should see ERROR message in same label but repeat see weight in label. How can i solve this problem? protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { double sayi1, sayi2, sayi3, hesap, sonuc; sayi1 = Convert.ToDouble(Tb1.Text); sayi2 = Convert.ToDouble(Tb2.Text); sayi3 = Convert.ToDouble(Tb3.Text); if (Tb1.MaxLength > 6 || Tb2.MaxLength > 6) { lbl1.Text = "ERROR."; } else { hesap = (((sayi1 - ((sayi1 - sayi2) / 2)) * ((sayi1 - sayi2) / 2)) / 40); sonuc = (hesap * sayi3) / 100; lbl1.Text = sonuc.ToString() + "kg"; } }

    Read the article

  • What's wrong with Xsendfile in Yii

    - by petwho
    I have been trying Xsendfile() method in Yii over 20 times and none of them gave me a result. Here is my code: $file_path = "D:/xampp/htdocs/mywebapp/protected/modules/file_upload".DS. 'views'.DS.'upload'.DS.testfile.".pdf"; Yii::app()->request->xSendFile($file_path ,array( 'saveName'=>$result['gen_name'] .".pdf", 'mimeType'=>'application/pdf', 'terminate'=>true, )); And despite changing the location of testfile.pdf everywhere on my hard drive, none of them works. I am nearly exhausted with this method. Anyone could help me from being headache? I am using windows and xampp 1.7.4. Thanks so much!

    Read the article

  • Problem accessing base member in derived constructor

    - by LeopardSkinPillBoxHat
    Given the following classes: class Foo { struct BarBC { protected: BarBC(uint32_t aKey) : mKey(aKey) mOtherKey(0) public: const uint32_t mKey; const uint32_t mOtherKey; }; struct Bar : public BarBC { Bar(uint32_t aKey, uint32_t aOtherKey) : BarBC(aKey), mOtherKey(aOtherKey) // Compile error here }; }; I am getting a compilation error at the point indicated: error: class `Foo::Bar' does not have any field named `mOtherKey'. Can anyone explain this? I suspect it's a syntactical problem due to my Bar class being defined within the Foo class, but can't seem to find a way around it. This is simple public inheritance, so mOtherKey should be accessible from the Bar constructor. Right? Or is it something to do with the fact that mOtherKey is const and I have already initialised it to 0 in the BarBC constructor?

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net - Gridview row selection and effects

    - by Clint
    I'm using the following code in attempt to allow the user to select a gridview row by clicking anywhere on the row (plus mouse over and out) effects. The code doesn't seem to be applied on rowdatabound and I can't break into the event. (It is wired). The control is in a usercontrol, that lives in a content page, which has a masterpage. protected void gvOrderTypes_RowDataBound(object sender, GridViewRowEventArgs e) { GridView gvOrdTypes = (GridView)sender; //check the item being bound is actually a DataRow, if it is, //wire up the required html events and attach the relevant JavaScripts if (e.Row.RowType == DataControlRowType.DataRow) { e.Row.Attributes["onmouseover"] = "javascript:setMouseOverColor(this);"; e.Row.Attributes["onmouseout"] = "javascript:setMouseOutColor(this);"; e.Row.Attributes["onclick"] = Page.ClientScript.GetPostBackClientHyperlink(gvOrdTypes, "Select$" + e.Row.RowIndex); } }

    Read the article

  • What is Ruby's double-colon (::) all about?

    - by Meltemi
    I'd probably be able to answer this for myself if "::" wasn't so hard to Google. Didn't see anything on SO so thought I'd try my luck. What is this double-colon :: all about? I see it everywhere in Rails: class User < ActiveRecord::Base or… ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| I found a definition from this guy: The :: is a unary operator that allows: constants, instance methods and class methods defined within a class or module, to be accessed from anywhere outside the class or module. but that just leads to more questions. What good is scope (private, protected) if you can just use :: to expose anything?

    Read the article

  • Help me understand Dispose() implementation code from MSDN

    - by Benny
    the following code is from MSDN: Idisposable pattern protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing) { // If you need thread safety, use a lock around these // operations, as well as in your methods that use the resource. if (!_disposed) { if (disposing) { if (_resource != null) _resource.Dispose(); Console.WriteLine("Object disposed."); } // Indicate that the instance has been disposed. _resource = null; _disposed = true; } } why the following statement: _resource = null; _disposed = true; are not enclosed by if (disposing) statement block? for me i would probably write like this: if (disposing) { if (_resource != null) { _resource.Dispose(); _resource = null; _disposed = true; } Console.WriteLine("Object disposed."); } anything wrong with my version?

    Read the article

  • Unreachable code detected in case statement

    - by alex
    I have a code: protected override bool ProcessCmdKey(ref Message msg, Keys keyData) { switch (keyData) { case Keys.Alt|Keys.D1: if (this._condition1) { return true; } else { return base.ProcessCmdKey(ref msg, keyData); } break; case Keys.Control |Keys.U: if (this._condition2) { return true; } else { return base.ProcessCmdKey(ref msg, keyData); } break; default: return base.ProcessCmdKey(ref msg, keyData); } return true; It gives me "unreachable code detected" warning on breaks. Is it good practice not to use break operator here ? I don't want to turn off "unreachable code detected" warning. PS: There are many case in my ProcessCmdKey method.

    Read the article

  • Index out of bounds exception in c#

    - by Naga
    I have the following code in my program which is throwing index out of bound exception at line yearList.SetValue(years[count], count); protected void invoiceYear_DataBound(object sender, EventArgs e) { //invoiceYear.SelectedItem.Value= GetYearRange(); String[] years = GetYearRange().Split(new char[] { '[', ',', ']',' ' }); ListItem [] yearList = new ListItem[]{}; System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("years-->" + years.Length); for (int i = 0; i < years.Length; i++) { System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("years-->" + years.GetValue(i)); } int count = 0; foreach (String str in years) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(str)) System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("empty"); else { yearList.SetValue(years[count], count); count++; } } //System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("yearList-->" + yearList.GetValue(0)); //invoiceYear.Items.AddRange(yearList); }

    Read the article

  • Don't Change URL in Browser When Clicking <asp:LinkButton>

    - by Corey Goldberg
    I have an ASP.NET page that uses a menu based on asp:LinkButton control in a Master page. When a user selects a menu item, an onclick handler calls a method in my C# code. The method it calls just does a Server.Transfer() to a new page. From what I have read, this is not supposed to change the URL displayed in the browser. The problem is it that the URL changes in the browser as the user navigates the menu to different pages. Here is an item in the menu: <asp:LinkButton id="foo" runat="server" onclick="changeToHelp"><span>Help</span> </asp:LinkButton> In my C# code, I handle the event with a method like: protected void changeToHelp(object sender, EventArgs e) { Server.Transfer("Help.aspx"); } Any ideas how I can navigate through the menu without the browser's URL bar changing?

    Read the article

  • Need to copy remotely hosted file via Shell Command

    - by pnm123
    There is a file that hosted remotely on a server that is not supporting Shell Access. I bought a new server that supports Shell Access so now I want to copy a file that is on the non-supporting server to new server via a Shell Command using Putty. File url is like this http://www.domain.com/file.gzip and it is username/password protected. To be more specific, I want to copy a backup of a home directory from cPanel to my new server via Shell command. I have done this few months ago but I don't remember it now and also I failed to Google it.

    Read the article

  • ExceptionHandling with Spring 3

    - by mjf
    I have this controller: @RequestMapping(value = "*.xls", method = RequestMethod.GET) public String excel(Model model) { return "excel"; The excel wiew opens actually a ExcelViewer, which is build in method protected void buildExcelDocument(Map<String, Object> map, WritableWorkbook ww, HttpServletRequest hsr, HttpServletResponse hsr1) throws Exception { Class.writecontent Class.writeMoreContent Called methods write content to the Excel sheet and they can throw e.g biffException. How can I show a certain error page when Exception is occured? I tried this @Controller public class ExcelController { @ExceptionHandler(BiffException.class) public String handleException(BiffException ex) { return "fail"; } @RequestMapping(value = "*.xls", method = RequestMethod.GET) public String excel(Model model) { return "excel"; } } But I'm getting the server's error message about Exceptions. Maybe a bean definition missing?

    Read the article

  • i don't know how to work with command argument in asp.net

    - by Depozitul de Chestii
    hey, i'm tryng to pass a parameter with command argument with a link button but the result i get is always "". this is in my aspx page: <% LinkButton1.CommandArgument = "abcdef"; %> <asp:LinkButton ID="LinkButton1" runat="server" OnCommand= "LinkButton1_Click"> and in my aspx.cs i have: protected void LinkButton1_Click(object sender,CommandEventArgs ee) { String id = ee.CommandName.ToString(); } the id is always "" after i press the linkbutton. would appreciate if someone could help me. thanks

    Read the article

  • How to mock static member variables

    - by pkrish
    I have a class ClassToTest which has a dependency on ClassToMock. public class ClassToMock { private static final String MEMBER_1 = FileReader.readMemeber1(); protected void someMethod() { ... } } The unit test case for ClassToTest. public class ClassToTestTest { private ClassToMock _mock; @Before public void setUp() throws Exception { _mock = mock(ClassToMock.class) } } When mock is called in the setUp() method, FileReader.readMemeber1(); is executed. Is there a way to avoid this? I think one way is to initialize the MEMBER_1 inside a method. Any other alternatives? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Android's listview. Update view within of of the cells just after invalidating Activity's view

    - by davs
    I have ListViewActivity public class SelectActivity extends ListActivity { protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.select_one_of); SimpleAdapter adapter = new SimpleAdapter( this, createChildList(), R.layout.select_one_of_childrow, new String[] { KEY_VALUE }, new int[] { R.id.selectoneof_add_new_item}); setListAdapter(adapter); } // ... } after setListAdapter() calls I would like to execute the following code: ((TextView) getListView().getChildAt(0).findViewById(R.id.selectoneof_add_new_item)).setCompoundDrawablesWithIntrinsicBounds(0, 0, R.drawable.ticked, 0); but getListView().getChildAt(xxx) returns null and I catch NullPointerException. Where should I put mentioned above code-snippet?

    Read the article

  • Accesing Label.text in DataList

    - by Itay Gurvich
    So im trying to access informtaion from a label inside the DataList by pressing a button inside it. I put a code in thusly: protected void DataList1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { Character character = (Character)Session["character"]; Label lbl = (Label)DataList1.SelectedItem.FindControl("lblName"); int SkillID = int.Parse(DAL.ExecuteScalar("SELECT SkillID FROM skills WHERE SkillName = '" + lbl.ToString() + "'").ToString()); DAL.ExecuteNonQuery("INSERT INTO AssignedSkills (Offensive) Values ('" + SkillID.ToString() + "') WHERE CharID = '" + character.get_name().ToString() + "'"); } when i press the button its not even getting there and im getting an error "Invalid postback or callback argument." how can i access it?

    Read the article

  • Make Java parent class not part of the interface

    - by Bart van Heukelom
    (This is a hypothetical question for discussion, I have no actual problem). Say that I'm making an implementation of SortedSet by extending LinkedHashMap: class LinkedHashSortedMapThing extends LinkedHashMap implements SortedSet { ... } Now programmers who use this class may do LinkedHashMap x = new LinkedHashSortedMapThing(); But what if I consider the extending of LinkedHashMap an implementation detail, and do not want it to be a part of the class' contract? If people use the line above, I can no longer freely change this detail without worrying about breaking existing code. Is there any way to prevent this sort of thing, other than favouring composition over inheritance (which is not always possible due to private/protected members)?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111  | Next Page >