Search Results

Search found 17317 results on 693 pages for 'memory upgrade'.

Page 109/693 | < Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >

• Can't upgrade MySQL Server on new Ubuntu 12.04 install

  - by user179627

  After freshly installing Ubuntu server 12.04, I did the usual apt-get update / apt-get upgrade, which failed for mysql-server-5.5: Setting up mysql-server-5.5 (5.5.31-0ubuntu0.12.04.2) ... start: Job failed to start invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action "start" failed. dpkg: error processing mysql-server-5.5 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of mysql-server: mysql-server depends on mysql-server-5.5; however: Package mysql-server-5.5 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing mysql-server (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured I tried a wide variety a approaches suggested by googling, which involved various combinations of apt-get remove/purge/install -f/reinstall, etc., with no luck. I also tried downloading the package directly from launchpad.net and running dpkg -i on it (this had worked for a similar issue with a kernel upgrade), but to no avail. I'm not actually particularly interested in what's going on with mysql, per se (though I will need to figure it out at some time); at this point, my primary concern is that I am unable to apt-get install other packages! What to do?

  Read the article

• Upgrading Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10 when Update Manager doesn't let you

  - by nickf

  I've been trying to upgrade my installation of Ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10, but all of the instructions I've found haven't been helping. They mostly say to run the update manager and it'll tell you that there's a new distribution ready. Well, mine doesn't say that. Things I've run or checked: update-manager -d says: Your system is up-to-date The package information was last updated less than one hour ago. I've set it to get all new distributions, not just LTS $ cat /etc/update-manager/release-upgrades [DEFAULT] # default prompting behavior, valid options: # never - never prompt for a new distribution version # normal - prompt if a new version of the distribution is available # lts - prompt only if a LTS version of the distribution is available Prompt=normal I'm definitely running 9.04 $ lsb_release -r Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 9.04 Release: 9.04 Codename: jaunty Even running the release upgrade from console doesn't help: $ sudo do-release-upgrade Checking for a new ubuntu release No new release found This is running from behind a proxy, but I've set it up such that the regular upgrades and apt-get etc doesn't complain. (export http_proxy=http://myuser:mypass@myserver:8080/) Could you think of anything else which might be stopping me from upgrading?

  Read the article

• freebsd-update failure

  - by ctuffli

  Some time ago, I upgrade my FreeBSD box to 7.1-RC2, but now I'd like to move to 7.2-RELEASE. I tried running # uname -mrsi FreeBSD 7.1-RC2 i386 GENERIC # freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.2-RELEASE Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RC2 from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RC2 from update5.FreeBSD.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RC2 from update2.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. Substituting 7.1 for 7.2 gives the same error. Adding a --debug option shows the failure as being fetch: http://update4.FreeBSD.org/7.1-RC2/i386/latest.ssl: Not Found Is there any way to still do a binary upgrade of this system as the 7.1-RC* directories don't exist on http://update.freebsd.org anymore? Upgrading from source is an option, but I wanted to see if there was some way to salvage this installation.

  Read the article

• Upgraded to Ubuntu 13.10 - Apache not able to start

  - by 0R10N

  I updated to Ubuntu 13.10 (from Ubuntu 13.04) last weekend, and now Apache is not being able to start. It was working perfectly well until the upgraded, and I haven't changed anything myself. When I ran a restart this is what I get apache2: Syntax error on line 260 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Could not open configuration file /etc/apache2/conf.d/: No such file or directory So, I created the directory, and then I get this: * Starting web server apache2 * * The apache2 configtest failed. Output of config test was: [Wed Oct 30 11:17:42.921934 2013] [proxy_html:notice] [pid 2496] AH01425: I18n support in mod_proxy_html requires mod_xml2enc. Without it, non-ASCII characters in proxied pages are likely to display incorrectly. AH00526: Syntax error on line 84 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Invalid command 'LockFile', perhaps misspelled or defined by a module not included in the server configuration Action 'configtest' failed. The Apache error log may have more information. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Problems after upgrading my ubuntu to Ubuntu 14.04 lts

  - by Petra

  I have problems after upgrading my older Ubuntu version to Ubuntu 14.04 lts. I was offered this installation and after the procss and restarting of the computer there is just a black page with following message: mount: mounting /dev/loop0 on /root failed: Invalid argument mount: mounting /dev on /root/dev failed: No such file or directory mount: mounting /sys on /root/sys failed: No such file or directory mount: mounting /proc on /root/proc failed: No such file or directory Target filesystem doesn't have requested /sbin/init. No init found. Try passing init= bootarg. BusyBox v1.21.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.21.0-1ubuntu1) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. (initramfs) _ The Windows which is installed on my laptop works normally. Thannk you very much for any answer.

  Read the article

• Linux Kernel not upgraded (from Ubuntu 12.04 to 12.10) - can't remove old kernels and can't install new apps

  - by Tony Breyal

  Question: How do I remove old kernel images which refuse to be removed? Context: Yesterday I upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 12.10. However, the linux kernel has not upgraded from 3.2 to 3.5 as I would have expected. $ uname -r 3.2.0-32-generic $ uname -a Linux tony-b 3.2.0-32-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 26 21:33:09 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/version Linux version 3.2.0-32-generic (buildd@batsu) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #51-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 26 21:33:09 UTC 2012 Not sure why that happened there. I wanted to install Audacity (v2.0.1-1_amd64) to edit a lecture audio file. When trying this operation through Ubuntu Software Center, it says that to install audacity, four items will need to be removed: linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic So I click "Install Anyway" but it fails with the following output: installArchives() failed: (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 5% (Reading database ... 10% (Reading database ... 15% (Reading database ... 20% (Reading database ... 25% (Reading database ... 30% (Reading database ... 35% (Reading database ... 40% (Reading database ... 45% (Reading database ... 50% (Reading database ... 55% (Reading database ... 60% (Reading database ... 65% (Reading database ... 70% (Reading database ... 75% (Reading database ... 80% (Reading database ... 85% (Reading database ... 90% (Reading database ... 95% (Reading database ... 100% (Reading database ... 259675 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-27-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-27-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-27-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Removing linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-29-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-29-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-29-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Removing linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-30-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-30-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-30-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-30-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-30-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Removing linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-31-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-31-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-31-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-31-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-31-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic Error in function: Setting up grub-pc (2.00-7ubuntu11) ... /usr/sbin/grub-bios-setup: warning: Sector 32 is already in use by the program `FlexNet'; avoiding it. This software may cause boot or other problems in future. Please ask its authors not to store data in the boot track. Installation finished. No error reported. Generating grub.cfg ... dpkg: error processing grub-pc (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 It seems I need to remove the old linux images somehow. I have tried this through (1) Synaptic, (2) Ubuntu Tweak, and (3) Computer Janitor. The first two fail, whilst Computer Janitor won't even open. The output from Synaptic is: E: linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 E: linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 E: linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 E: linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 How do I remove these old images? Thank you kindly in advance for any help on this matter. P.S. Further information: $ dpkg --list | grep linux-image rH linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic 3.2.0-27.43 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP rH linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic 3.2.0-29.46 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP rH linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic 3.2.0-30.48 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP rH linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 3.2.0-31.50 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-image-3.2.0-32-generic 3.2.0-32.51 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.2.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-image-3.5.0-17-generic 3.5.0-17.28 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.5.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-image-extra-3.5.0-17-generic 3.5.0-17.28 amd64 Linux kernel image for version 3.5.0 on 64 bit x86 SMP ii linux-image-generic 3.5.0.17.19 amd64 Generic Linux kernel image But trying to remove using the command line fails too e.g.: $ sudo apt-get purge linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 4 to remove and 1 not upgraded. 5 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 597 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y (Reading database ... 259675 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-27-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-27-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-27-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-27-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached Removing linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-29-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-29-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-29-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached Removing linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-30-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-30-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-30-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-30-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-30-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached Removing linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-31-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-31-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-31-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-31-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-31-generic Generating grub.cfg ... run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic.postrm line 328. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic (--remove): subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-3.2.0-27-generic linux-image-3.2.0-29-generic linux-image-3.2.0-30-generic linux-image-3.2.0-31-generic E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  Read the article

• nvidia driver problem after update

  - by baltasar

  I know there are a lot of posts about nvdia driver, but I am not able to solve this. I updated my configuration yesterday, September 27th, and it seems that a new nvidia driver was involved. The updated completed with an error, and invited me to send a bug report automatically. I send it, but it finally said that there was no place to send the bug report to. Today I updated again, and a new kernel was there. Then I rebooted. I found a desktop in 640x480 with a horrible, unreadable font. I run jockey and tried to go back to another version of the nvidia driver, but it seems that none of the drivers listed there are suddenly valid. I have the x-swat repository enabled, because I remember that I had a similar issue in the past that was only to be solved with the newest driver. jockey log: 2012-09-28 11:22:24,747 DEBUG: Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-173. (Reading database ... 536311 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking nvidia-173 (from .../nvidia-173_173.14.35-0ubuntu0.2_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up nvidia-173 (173.14.35-0ubuntu0.2) ... Loading new nvidia-173-173.14.35 DKMS files... Building only for 3.2.0-32-generic-pae Building for architecture i686 Building initial module for 3.2.0-32-generic-pae Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-32-generic-pae (i686) Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia-173/173.14.35/build/make.log for more information. Processing triggers for bamfdaemon ... Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf.index... 2012-09-28 11:22:25,143 WARNING: modinfo for module nvidia_173 failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module nvidia_173 2012-09-28 11:22:25,143 ERROR: XorgDriverHandler.enable(): package or module not installed, aborting 2012-09-28 11:22:53,613 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:22:53,613 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:22:53,629 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:22:53,629 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:01,943 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:01,943 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:01,962 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:01,963 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:01,998 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173_updates).enabled(): target_alt None current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt None other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:01,998 DEBUG: nvidia_173_updates is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,044 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_current).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,044 DEBUG: nvidia_current is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,066 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_current).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,066 DEBUG: nvidia_current is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,106 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_current_updates).enabled(): target_alt None current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt None other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,106 DEBUG: nvidia_current_updates is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,157 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,157 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:02,177 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,178 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:02,245 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,245 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:02,272 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,273 DEBUG: KMH enabled: False 2012-09-28 11:23:02,303 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_173_updates).enabled(): target_alt None current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt None other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,303 DEBUG: nvidia_173_updates is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,330 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_current).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,410 DEBUG: nvidia_current is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,427 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_current).enabled(): target_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/ld.so.conf current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt /usr/lib/nvidia-current/alt_ld.so.conf other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,428 DEBUG: nvidia_current is not the alternative in use 2012-09-28 11:23:02,457 DEBUG: NVidia(nvidia_current_updates).enabled(): target_alt None current_alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/ld.so.conf other target alt None other current alt /usr/lib/nvidia-173/alt_ld.so.conf 2012-09-28 11:23:02,458 DEBUG: nvidia_current_updates is not the alternative in use

  Read the article

• Error during update 'Unable to connect to 192.168.43.1:8000'

  - by Alex R

  When I tried to update my Ubuntu through the update manager I received an error about some unknown resource. so i tried doing it from the terminal with sudo apt-get update but all I got is: 0% [Connecting to 192.168.43.1 repeating itself... and when I press Enter it shows: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 192.168.43.1:8000: E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. How can I get this to work?

  Read the article

• apt-get is broken

  - by Amol Shinde

  I Cannot install any package in the server, As I am newbie in Server. In Morning I found that some, I am not able to install any package from command line in the server,Now every package is now manually downloaded packages and then installed in the server. Can any one Please tell me what is the issue and how could it be resolved. OS:- Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS \n \l (64 Bit) Below is the error: iam@ubuntu$ sudo apt-get install pidgin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done pidgin is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 102 not upgraded. 32 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 33, in <module> from ALChacks import * File "/usr/share/apt-listchanges/ALChacks.py", line 32, in <module> sys.stderr.write(_("Can't set locale; make sure $LC_* and $LANG are correct!\n")) NameError: name '_' is not defined perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "UTF-8", LANG = "en_IN" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Setting up shared-mime-info (0.71-1ubuntu2) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/shared-mime-info.postinst: line 13: 21935 Segmentation fault update-mime-database.real /usr/share/mime dpkg: error processing shared-mime-info (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtk2.0-0: libgtk2.0-0 depends on shared-mime-info; however: Package shared-mime-info is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgtk2.0-0 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of chromium-browser: chromium-browser depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing chromium-browser (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of chromium-codecs-ffmpeg: chromium-codecs-ffmpeg depends on chromium-browser (>= 4.0.203.0~); however: Package chromium-browser is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing chromium-codecs-ffmpeg (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of chromium-browser-l10n: chromium-browser-l10n depends on chromium-browser (= 18.0.1025.151~r130497-0ubuntu0.10.04.No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already 1); however: Package chromium-browser is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing chromium-browser-l10n (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libevdocument2: libevdocument2 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libevdocument2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libevview2: libevview2 depends on libevdocument2 (>= 2.29.5); however: Package libevdocument2 is not configured yet. libevview2 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libevview2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of evince: evince depends on libevdocument2 (>= 2.29.5); however: Package libevdocument2 is not configured yet. evince depends on libevview2 (>= 2.29.No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already 5); however: Package libevview2 is not configured yet. evince depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.16.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. evince depends on shared-mime-info; however: Package shared-mime-info is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing evince (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of firefox: firefox depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing firefox (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gcalctool: gcalctool depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.18.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gcalctool (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgdict-1.0-6: libgdict-1.0-6 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.18.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgdict-1.0-6 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gnome-utils: gnome-utils depends on libgdict-1.0-6 (>= 2.23.90); however: Package libgdict-1.0-6 is not configured yet. gnome-utils depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.18.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gnome-utils (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of gtk2-engines-pixbuf: gtk2-engines-pixbuf depends on gtk2.0-binver-2.10.0; however: Package gtk2.0-binver-2.10.0 is not installed. Package libgtk2.0-0 which provides gtk2.0-binver-2.10.0 is not configured yet. gtk2-engines-pixbuf depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing gtk2-engines-pixbuf (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libedataserverui1.2-8: libedataserverui1.2-8 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libedataserverui1.2-8 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgail18: libgail18 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgail18 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtk2.0-bin: libgtk2.0-bin depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgtk2.0-bin (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtk2.0-dev: libgtk2.0-dev depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgtk2.0-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libnotify-dev: libnotify-dev depends on libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.10); however: Package libgtk2.0-dev is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libnotify-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of network-manager-gnome: network-manager-gnome depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.16.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing network-manager-gnome (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org-core: openoffice.org-core depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.10); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-core (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org-draw: openoffice.org-draw depends on openoffice.org-core (= 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.4); however: Package openoffice.org-core is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-draw (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org-impress: openoffice.org-impress depends on openoffice.org-core (= 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.4); however: Package openoffice.org-core is not configured yet. openoffice.org-impress depends on openoffice.org-draw (= 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.4); however: Package openoffice.org-draw is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-impress (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pidgin: pidgin depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.18.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing pidgin (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Setting up update-manager (1:0.134.12.1) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing update-manager (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 245 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of update-notifier: update-notifier depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. update-notifier depends on update-manager; however: Package update-manager is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing update-notifier (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of xulrunner-1.9.2: xulrunner-1.9.2 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.18.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing xulrunner-1.9.2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of xulrunner-1.9.2-dev: xulrunner-1.9.2-dev depends on xulrunner-1.9.2 (= 1.9.2.28+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1); however: Package xulrunner-1.9.2 is not configured yet. xulrunner-1.9.2-dev depends on libnotify-dev; however: Package libnotify-dev is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing xulrunner-1.9.2-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of icedtea6-plugin: icedtea6-plugin depends on xulrunner-1.9.2; however: Package xulrunner-1.9.2 is not configured yet. icedtea6-plugin depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.8.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing icedtea6-plugin (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up libgweather-common (2.30.0-0ubuntu1.1) ... No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libgweather-common (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 245 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgweather1: libgweather1 depends on libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.11.0); however: Package libgtk2.0-0 is not configured yet. libgweather1 depends on libgweather-common (>= 2.24.0); however: Package libgweather-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgweather1 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org-style-galaxy: openoffice.org-style-galaxy depends on openoffice.org-core (>= 1:3.2.0~beta); however: Package openoffice.org-core is not configured yet. No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-style-galaxy (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org-common depends on openoffice.org-style-default | openoffice.org-style; however: Package openoffice.org-style-default is not installed. Package openoffice.org-style-galaxy which provides openoffice.org-style-default is not configured yet. Package openoffice.org-style is not installed. Package openoffice.org-style-galaxy which provides openoffice.org-style is not configured yet. No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: error processing openoffice.org-common (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: shared-mime-info libgtk2.0-0 chromium-browser chromium-codecs-ffmpeg chromium-browser-l10n libevdocument2 libevview2 evince firefox gcalctool libgdict-1.0-6 gnome-utils gtk2-engines-pixbuf libedataserverui1.2-8 libgail18 libgtk2.0-bin libgtk2.0-dev libnotify-dev network-manager-gnome openoffice.org-core openoffice.org-draw openoffice.org-impress pidgin update-manager update-notifier xulrunner-1.9.2 xulrunner-1.9.2-dev icedtea6-plugin libgweather-common libgweather1 openoffice.org-style-galaxy openoffice.org-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) While typing command in terminal, command is not auto-completing.

  Read the article

• How to login as other in ubuntu 12.04

  - by murali

  i have upgraded my ubuntu 11.10 to 12.04. i could not see other login option in the login screen. it shows only Guest login and User login. The User Login ask only password and i had never entered in as User login so that i do not know about password of User login. my problem is how to login as root from the login screen? how can i get Other login option to login as root or some other user? before ask this question i have tried the following: try to add the greeter-show-manual-login=true line at the bottom of /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf file as Guest login but i get access denied error. i do not know the password of User login (ask only password while login) to purpose of adding above line. from the safe mode login, i could login as root but i could not add the above line the lightdm.conf file . i got read only error so that i tried to change the permission to 777 like the following > chmod 777 lightdm.conf (i am within the /etc/lightdm/). but i got the error the file marked as/is read only in the file system. In 11.10 version i have created 4 users. i can see that the users exist in 12.10 . so i am sure my self users are not removed while upgrate. In short, i need Other login option on my login screen? how to get it? please help me. * Edited Question:* i have add the following line the /etc/lightdm/lighdm.conf file on recovery mode greeter-show-manual-login=true and i saved the file using wq command. now my /etc/lightdm/lighdm.conf file looking as the following: [SeatDefaults] greeter-session=unity-greeter user-session=ubuntu greeter-show-manual-login=true if i commit any mistake please correct me. by this problem i have wasted the two working day and all the works are in pending... please help me.

  Read the article

• some files just wont install- linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic

  - by jatin

  It gives the following details of the package operation failing after using the sofware updater on 12.10: installArchives() failed: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 217566 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic 3.5.0-36.57~precise1 (using .../linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/System.map-3.5.0-36-generic' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-36-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-36-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-36-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-36-generic Preparing to replace linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic 3.5.0-42.65~precise1 (using .../linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/System.map-3.5.0-42-generic' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-42-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-42-generic dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-42-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-42-generic Preparing to replace memtest86+ 4.20-1.1ubuntu1 (using .../memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement memtest86+ ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/memtest86+.bin' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb Error in function: Output of df -h: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 38G 6.5G 30G 19% / udev 3.5G 4.0K 3.5G 1% /dev tmpfs 1.5G 924K 1.5G 1% /run none 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock none 3.6G 296K 3.6G 1% /run/shm none 100M 64K 100M 1% /run/user /dev/sda1 197M 87M 111M 44% /boot /dev/sda5 243G 971M 230G 1% /home

  Read the article

• Difference in Ubuntu One sync-speed between Natty and other versions?

  - by bisi

  I was wondering if anyone had had the chance to compare performance between Ubuntu One upload speeds on Natty Narwhal and any other version of Ubuntu? Also, any difference on how well it connects? [don't shoot me for asking ;)] I am hesitant about upgrading on my regular workstation, but if it improves my user-experience with U1, I might be willing to risk it... Thanks for all informed opinions :) bisi

  Read the article

• Will Ubuntu break my RAID 0 array?

  - by Chad

  I am upgrading an older machine today with new Motherboard, RAM, and CPU. Then I am going to do a fresh install of Ubuntu 64bit. Currently the old machine has an 80gb system drive, and a 4TB RAID 0 array. The old Motherboard has no SATA ports, so I used a SATA card. Ubuntu set up the old RAID array, will it still recognize the array on a newer machine? Are there any steps I should take to ensure the array isn't damaged? It's non-crucial data, but I would rather not start over if it can be avoided. Thanks.

  Read the article

• Problem with apt-get update: failed to fetch error

  - by user171447

  I run an Ubuntu Server 12.04.3 LTS. Today, I wanted to update it, but I did not managed it (yes...), however upgrading worked well. I don't want you to solve my problem but it would be greatful if you could give me some hints. I googled hours, I fould a lot of this kind of errors, but not exactly this. Here is the output of apt-get update: Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise Release Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse amd64 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe i386 Packages Hit http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse i386 Packages Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/main Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/multiverse Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/restricted Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe Translation-en_GB Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe Translation-en Ign http://filepile.fastit.net precise/universe Translation-en_GB.UTF-8 Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en_GB Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en_GB Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages :W: Failed to fetch http://archive.canonical.com/dists/precise/Release Unable to find expected entry 'main/binary-amd64/Packages' in Release file (Wrong sources.list entry or malformed file) E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en_GB Hit http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en And here is my /etc/apt/sources.list: ###### Ubuntu Main Repos deb http://filepile.fastit.net/ubuntu/ precise main restricted universe multiverse # deb http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.canonical.com/ precise main restricted universe multiverse ###### Ubuntu Update Repos deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted multiverse deb-src http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main restricted multiverse Thanks for your help!

  Read the article

• Comparing Standard Editions of SQL Server

  - by RickHeiges

  Recently, I've been speaking with customers about upgrading SQL Server. At times, some customers have a lot of Standard Edition SQL Server 2005 / 2008 / 2008R2 in their organization and they want to see the features they get when upgrading to SQL Server 2012. Last week, I sent out some tweets to the #sqlhelp hashtag to see if someone has already put together a document or blog post about comparing the Standard Editions. I was unable to discover anything out there that really focuses just on Standard...(read more)

  Read the article

• how to do database updates in each release

  - by Manoj R

  Our application uses database (mostly Oracle), and database is at the core. Each customer has its own database, with its own copy of application. Now with each new release of our product, we also need to update the database schema. These changes are adding new tables, removing columns, manipulating data etc. How do the people handle this? Are there any standard processes for this? EDIT:- The main issue is the databases are huge with many tables and more of huge amount of data. We provide the scripts and some utilities to manipulate the data. How to handle the failures and false negatives? More of looking for this kind articles. http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Database-Changes-Done-Right.aspx

  Read the article

• Cannot launch software centre, neither update

  - by Michal

  m@samsung:~$ sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/* -vf [sudo] password for m: rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/apt/lists/partial': Is a directory m@samsung:~$ sudo apt-get update N: Ignoring file 'gnomebaker.lis' in directory '/etc/apt/sources.list.d/' as it has an invalid filename extension E: Malformed line 1 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/gnomebaker.list (URI parse) E: The list of sources could not be read. m@samsung:~$

  Read the article

• New instalation with invalid signatures: NODATA 1 NODATA 2 error

  - by marcos nobre

  I am installing 13.04 into a VirtualBox machine. After installing, I receive this error after sudo apt-get update: Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com raring Release E: Erro GPG: http://archive.ubuntu.com raring Release: the following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2 I have already tried: Install minimal server version; Install 12.04 desktop version; Everything gives me the same error.

  Read the article

• How to impove Ubuntu performance on netbook

  - by Alexey Shytikov

  Most recent Ubuntu 12.04 seems to be quite nice and Unity (3D/2D) works fine for me, however not on my old Acer Aspire One any more. There was a times, when I switched from Windows XP to Ubuntu and was happy about system looks, effects and speed... now I attend to think that XP was really great comparing with 12.04. I have found similar questions here but no reasonable answer: how to lower CPU usage for Unity (3D/2D) and memory consumption for Ubuntu 12.04. With new interface I could not find how to disable background services... It's Linux, it's should be the way to optimize without buying new PC... Please share your recipe!

  Read the article

• Incorrect instructions on Upgrading to 12.10 from 12.04LTS

  - by Russ F

  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuantalQuetzal/TechnicalOverview/Beta1 reports incorrect instructions for upgrading from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The correct steps are: Alt+F2, Update Manager, choose settings, updates tab and set notify to "For any new version." Close the manager. Press Alt+F2, Terminal, then enter "sudo update-manager -d" (without the quotes)... Sorry to pester this list, but the Ubuntu wiki has no provisions for "Talk" or "Discussion" that do not require registration and a login. I feel like I should be able to point out a problem without signing in.

  Read the article

• Partner Webcast - Migration to Weblogic Server 11g

  - by lukasz.romaszewski(at)oracle.com

  Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language:RO;} Partner Webcast - Migration to Weblogic Server 11g March 25th, 12noonCET (1pm  EET/ 11am GMT)   Description The Oracle WebLogic 11g application server product line is the industry's most comprehensive Java platform for developing, deploying, and integrating enterprise applications. It provides the foundation for application grid, which is an architecture that enables enterprises to outperform their competitors while minimizing operational costs. Agenda 1.      1. Introduction to the Oracle WebLogic Server 11g 2.      2. Migration Process overview 3.      3. Migrating from iAS 10g a.      SmartUpgrade utility introduction b.      SmartUpgrade Demo 4.      4. Migrating from other JEE application servers a.      Understanding potential caveats b.      Using WebLogic classloader mechanism to isolate application c.       Shared libraries overview 5.      5. Migrating Oracle Fusion Middleware components (Forms&Reports, ADF, SOA etc) 6.      6. Summary 7.      7. Q&A    Delivery Format This FREE online LIVE eSeminar will be delivered over the Web and Conference Call. To register, click here For any questions please contact [email protected]. Registrations received less than 24hours  prior to start time may not receive confirmation to attend.

  Read the article

• Gnome Shell got removed after updating Ubuntu 12.04

  - by CMG

  Now when i try to install it...it shows the following error sudo apt-get install gnome-shell Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnome-shell : Depends: libgcr-3-1 (>= 3.4.0) but 3.2.2-2ubuntu4 is to be installed Depends: gir1.2-gcr-3 but it is not installable Recommends: gnome-contacts but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. How can I install GNOME-Shell?

  Read the article

• Mirroring Ubuntu on several systems in a computer lab

  - by Harvey Steck

  I am working in a new refugee school where the only Internet service available is a slow satellite connection. We are about to set up a computer lab (already have desktop systems and am about to install Ubuntu on them). I'm a newbie when it comes to Linux, but it seems a better alternative than pirated copies of Windows. I'd like to set up one Ubuntu system, and then mirror that system on perhaps ten to twenty other systems (all of which would be on an ethernet network). I expect to have an internet connection on the one system that I set up, but then it may be difficult to have enough bandwidth to go through all the same steps on the other ten systems. Can I set up the other ten or twenty computers to get all of their updates/upgrades/configuration from one master system? Can I also set things up so that students cannot change the configuration, install new programs, etc.? Appreciate any help you can give. -- Harvey

  Read the article

• Upgrading from raring to saucy broke many of my fonts in certain applications

  - by valadil

  I upgraded from raring to saucy over the weekend. Two of my applications, dzen2 and xmobar, won't display the fonts they used to. I'd mostly been using fixed and 6x12. xmobar doesn't run with these fonts. dzen2 shows some generic font I can't identify. I can change the size but not the font. The only exception is terminus. I looped over xlsfonts and piped them into a dzen2 to see what still worked. Variants of terminus were fine. Everything else used the same generic looking font face. No idea why. I haven't found any other applications with font issues since the update, but I haven't tried too hard to look either.

  Read the article

• Is there a rational reason to wait for the release date to download, install or update to the next version of Ubuntu?

  - by badp

  Today, October 6th 2010, Ubuntu 10.10 is in Feature Definition Freeze, Debian Import Freeze, Feature Freeze, User Interface Freeze, Beta Freeze, Documentation String Freeze, Final Freeze, Kernel Freeze and past the Translation Deadlines in both the non-language pack and language pack editions as the release schedule details. Basically, except for last minute bugfixes, the version of Ubuntu 10.10 you can download today is identical to the version of Ubuntu 10.10 you can download on the 10th when it gets released. If you downloaded and installed Ubuntu 10.10 today, you would: help find glaring issues for last minute fixing help defray the network load on October 10th see Ubuntu 10.10 in action without waiting Those sound like pretty strong arguments... to me, and indeed I've been using Ubuntu 10.10 for a month now roughly. However, most people prefer to make the jump with everybody else on release day. What are the rational reasons for that?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >