Search Results

Search found 3766 results on 151 pages for 'singleton scope'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 11/151 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

  • How do I scope variables properly in jQuery?

    - by safetycopy
    I'm working on a jQuery plugin, but am having some trouble getting my variables properly scoped. Here's an example from my code: (function($) { $.fn.ksana = function(userOptions) { var o = $.extend({}, $.fn.ksana.defaultOptions, userOptions); return this.each(function() { alert(rotate()); // o is not defined }); }; function rotate() { return Math.round(o.negRot + (Math.random() * (o.posRot - o.negRot))); }; $.fn.ksana.defaultOptions = { negRot: -20, posRot: 20 }; })(jQuery); I'm trying to get the private function rotate to be able to see the o variable, but it just keeps alerting 'o is not defined'. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.

    Read the article

  • Basic Python: Exception raising and local variable scope / binding

    - by SuperJdynamite
    I have a basic "best practices" Python question. I see that there are already StackOverflow answers tangentially related to this question but they're mired in complicated examples or involve multiple factors. Given this code: #!/usr/bin/python def test_function(): try: a = str(5) raise b = str(6) except: print b test_function() what is the best way to avoid the inevitable "UnboundLocalError: local variable 'b' referenced before assignment" that I'm going to get in the exception handler? Does python have an elegant way to handle this? If not, what about an inelegant way? In a complicated function I'd prefer to avoid testing the existence of every local variable before I, for example, printed debug information about them.

    Read the article

  • Variable scope problem in JavaScript

    - by dfjhdfjhdf
    I declare a variable with the var word inside a function that handles Ajax requests, then later on in the function I have another function that should change the value of the variable but - my problem - it fails. How to settle the problem down? Here's similiar code I use: function sendRuest(someargums) { /* some code */ var the_variable; /* some code */ //here's that other function request.onreadystatechange = function() { if (request.readyState == 4) { switch (request.status) { case 200: //here the variable should be changed the_variable = request.responseXML; /* a lot of code */ //somewhere here the function closes } return the_variable; } var data = sendRequest(someargums); //and trying to read the data I get the undefined value

    Read the article

  • Global JavaScript Variable Scope: Why doesn't this work?

    - by CoryDorning
    So I'm playing around with JavaScript and came across what I think to be an oddity. Is anyone able to explain the following? (i've included the alerted values as comments) Why is the first alert(msg) inside foo() returning undefined and not outside? var msg = 'outside'; function foo() { alert(msg); // undefined var msg = 'inside'; alert(msg); // inside } foo(); alert(msg); // outside Considering these both work fine: var msg = 'outside'; function foo() { alert(msg); // outside } alert(msg); // outside and: var msg = 'outside'; function foo() { var msg = 'inside'; alert(msg); // inside } alert(msg); // outside

    Read the article

  • Accessing variables with different scope in C++

    - by Portablejim
    With #include <iostream> using namespace std; int a = 1; int main() { int a = 2; if(true) { int a = 3; cout << a << " " << ::a // Can I access a = 2 here? << " " << ::a << endl; } cout << a << " " << ::a << endl; } having the output 3 1 1 2 1 Is there a way to access the 'a' equal to 2 inside the if statement where there is the 'a' equal to 3, with the output 3 2 1 2 1 Note: I know this should not be done (and the code should not get to the point where I need to ask). This question is more "can it be done".

    Read the article

  • Hide or Show singleton?

    - by Sinker
    Singleton is a common pattern implemented in both native libraries of .NET and Java. You will see it as such: C#: MyClass.Instance Java: MyClass.getInstance() The question is: when writing APIs, is it better to expose the singleton through a property or getter, or should I hide it as much as possible? Here are the alternatives for illustrative purposes: Exposed(C#): private static MyClass instance; public static MyClass Instance { get { if (instance == null) instance = new MyClass(); return instance; } } public void PerformOperation() { ... } Hidden (C#): private static MyClass instance; public static void PerformOperation() { if (instance == null) { instance = new MyClass(); } ... } EDIT: There seems to be a number of detractors of the Singleton design. Great! Please tell me why and what is the better alternative. Here is my scenario: My whole application utilises one logger (log4net/log4j). Whenever, the program has something to log, it utilises the Logger class (e.g. Logger.Instance.Warn(...) or Logger.Instance.Error(...) etc. Should I use Logger.Warn(...) or Logger.Warn(...) instead? If you have an alternative to singletons that addresses my concern, then please write an answer for it. Thank you :)

    Read the article

  • Android Static Variable Scope and Lifetime

    - by Edison
    I have an application that has a Service uses a ArrayList to store in the background for a very long time, the variable is initialized when the service started. The service is in the background and there will be frequent access to the variable (that's why i don't want to use file management or settings since it will be very expensive for a file I/O for the sake of battery life). The variable will likely to be ~1MB-2MB over its life tie. Is it safe to say that it will never be nulled by GC or the system or is there any way to prevent it? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Coffeescript getting proper scope from callback method

    - by pandabrand
    I've searched for this and can't seem to find an successful answer, I'm using a jQuerey ajax call and I can't get the response out to the callback. Here's my coffeescript code: initialize: (@blog, @posts) -> _url = @blog.url _simpleName = _url.substr 7, _url.length _avatarURL = exports.tumblrURL + _simpleName + 'avatar/128' $.ajax url: _avatarURL dataType: "jsonp" jsonp: "jsonp" (data, status) => handleData(data) handleData: (data) => console.log data @avatar = data Here's the compiled JS: Blog.prototype.initialize = function(blog, posts) { var _avatarURL, _simpleName, _url, _this = this; this.blog = blog; this.posts = posts; _url = this.blog.url; _simpleName = _url.substr(7, _url.length); _avatarURL = exports.tumblrURL + _simpleName + 'avatar/128'; return $.ajax({ url: _avatarURL, dataType: "jsonp", jsonp: "jsonp" }, function(data, status) { return handleData(data); }); }; Blog.prototype.handleData = function(data) { console.log(data); return this.avatar = data; }; I've tried a dozen variations and I can't figure out how to write this? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Singleton Properties

    - by coffeeaddict
    Ok, if I create a singleton class and expose the singleton object through a public static property...I understand that. But my singleton class has other properties in it. Should those be static? Should those also be private? I just want to be able to access all properties of my singleton class by doing this: MySingletonClass.SingletonProperty.SomeProperty2 Where SingletonProperty returns me the single singleton instance. I guess my question is, how do you expose the other properties in the singleton class..make them private and then access them through your public singleton static property?

    Read the article

  • How to bind a control to a singleton in Cocoa?

    - by SphereCat1
    I have a singleton in my FTP app designed to store all of the types of servers that the app can handle, such as FTP or Amazon S3. These types are plugins which are located in the app bundle. Their path is located by applicationWillFinishLoading: and sent to the addServerType: method inside the singleton to be loaded and stored in an NSMutableDictionary. My question is this: How do I bind an NSDictionaryController to the dictionary inside the singleton instance? Can it be done in IB, or do I have to do it in code? I need to be able to display the dictionary's keys in an NSPopupButton so the user can select a server type. Thanks in advance! SphereCat1

    Read the article

  • Do I still have to implement a singleton class by hand in .net, even when using .Net4.0?

    - by Hamish Grubijan
    Once the singleton pattern is understood, writing subsequent singleton classes in C# is a brainless exercise. I would hope that the framework would help you by providing an interface or a base class to do that. Here is how I envision it: public sealed class Schablone : ISingleton<Schablone> { // Stuff forced by the interface goes here // Extra logic goes here } Does what I am looking for exist? Is there some syntactic sugar for constructing a singleton class - whether with an interface, a class attribute, etc.? Can one write a useful and bullet-proof ISingleton themselves? Care to try? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Is this a valid, lazy, thread-safe Singleton implementation for C#?

    - by Matthew
    I implemented a Singleton pattern like this: public sealed class MyClass { ... public static MyClass Instance { get { return SingletonHolder.instance; } } ... static class SingletonHolder { public static MyClass instance = new MyClass (); } } From Googling around for C# Singleton implementations, it doesn't seem like this is a common way to do things in C#. I found one similar implementation, but the SingletonHolder class wasn't static, and included an explicit (empty) static constructor. Is this a valid, lazy, thread-safe way to implement the Singleton pattern? Or is there something I'm missing?

    Read the article

  • How can I timeout Client-scoped variables in Coldfusion?

    - by Joshua Carmody
    I apologize if this is a "duh" question. It seems like the answer should be easily googleable, but I haven't found it yet. I am working on a large Coldfusion application that stores a large amount of session/user data in the Client scope (ie <cfset Client.UserName = "JoshuaC"> ). I did not write this application, and I don't have the luxury of significantly refactoring it. I've been given the task of setting the Client variables to time out after 72 hours. I'm not entirely sure how to do this. If I had written the application, I would have stored the variables in the Session scope, and then changed the sessiontimeout attribute of the CFAPPLICATION tag. As it is though, I'm not sure if that timeout affects the Client variables, or what their level of persistence is. The way the application works now, the Client variables never time out, and only clearing the user's cookies, or visiting a logout page which sets all the Client-scoped application variables to "", will clear the values. Of course, I could create some kind of timestamp variable like Client.LastAccessDateTime, and put something in the Application.cfm to clear the client variables if that datetime is more than 72 hours prior to Now(). But there's got to be a better way, right?

    Read the article

  • What is the JavaScript variable scope in a switch / case statment?

    - by Todd Moses
    While creating JavaScript with ASP.NET MVC I noticed several scope warnings and realized that I am missing something with understanding the variable scope inside the switch / case statement. Warning: 'i' is already defined referring to case b and case c My code looks similar to this: switch(element) { case 'a': for(var i=0; i < count; i++){ do something } break; case 'b': for(var i=0; i < count; i++){ do something } break; case 'c': for(var i=0; i < count; i++){ do something } break; } I thought scope ended with each break statement but it seems that scope does not end until the end of the switch/case. Is scope for the entire switch/case?

    Read the article

  • Is there any reason for an object pool to not be treated as a singleton?

    - by Chris Charabaruk
    I don't necessarily mean implemented using the singleton pattern, but rather, only having and using one instance of a pool. I don't like the idea of having just one pool (or one per pooled type). However, I can't really come up with any concrete situations where there's an advantage to multiple pools for mutable types, at least not any where a single pool can function just as well. What advantages are there to having multiple pools over a singleton pool?

    Read the article

  • Defining scope for Record Count functoid:

    - by ArunManick
    Defining scope for Record Count functoid: Problem: One of the most common scenarios in BizTalk is calculating the record count of repeating structure. BizTalk has come up with an advanced functoid called Record Count functoid which will give the record count for the repeating structure however you cannot define the scope for a Record Count functoid. Because Record Count functoid accepts exactly one parameter which can be repeating record or field element.   If somebody don’t know what “scope” means I will explain with a simple example. Consider that we have a source schema having a structure Country -> State -> City. Country will have various states and each state will have different cities. Now you want to calculate no. of cities present in each state. Here scope is defined at the parent node “State”. Traditional Record Count functoid will give the total no. of cities present in the source message and not the State level city count.   Source Schema:   Destination Schema:   Soultion #1: As the title indicates we are not going to add one more parameter to the record count functoid. Instead of that, we are going to achieve the solution with the help of Scripting functoid with Inline XSLT script. XSLT is basically the transformation language used in the mapping.     “No.OfCities” indicates the destination field name to which we are going to send the value. In count(City), “count” refers to built in XPath function used in XSLT and “City” refers to source schema record name. Here you can find the list of built-in functions available in XSLT.   The mapping will look like as follows:   The 2 Record Count functoids used in this map will give the total number of states and total number of cities as that of input message.   Soultion #2:  If someone doesn’t like XSLT code and they wish to achieve the solution using functoids alone, then here is another solution.   Use logical Existence functoid to check whether “City” exist or not Connect the output of Logical Existence functoid to the Value Mapping functoid with second parameter as constant “1”. Hence if the first parameter is TRUE it will give the output as “1”. Connect the output of Value Mapping functoid to the Cumulative Sum functoid with scope as “1”   This will calculate the City count at the state level. The mapping will look like as follows:     Let us see the sample input and the map output.   Input: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <ns0:Country xmlns:ns0="http://RecordCount.Source">   <State>     <StateName>Tamilnadu</StateName>     <City>       <CityName>Pollachi</CityName>     </City>     <City>       <CityName>Coimbatore</CityName>     </City>     <City>       <CityName>Chennai</CityName>     </City>   </State>   <State>     <StateName>Kerala</StateName>     <City>       <CityName>Palakad</CityName>     </City>   </State>   <State>     <StateName>Karnataka</StateName>     <City>       <CityName>Bangalore</CityName>     </City>     <City>       <CityName>Mangalore</CityName>     </City>   </State> </ns0:Country>     Output: <ns0:Country xmlns:ns0="http://RecordCount.Destination">           <No.OfStates>3</No.OfStates>           <No.OfCities>6</No.OfCities>           <States>                    <No.OfCities>3</No.OfCities>           </States>           <States>                    <No.OfCities>1</No.OfCities>           </States>           <States>                    <No.OfCities>2</No.OfCities>           </States> </ns0:Country>   Conclusion: This is my first post and I hope you enjoyed it.   -Arun

    Read the article

  • Could a singleton type replace static methods and classes?

    - by MKO
    In C# Static methods has long served a purpose allowing us to call them without instantiating classes. Only in later year have we became more aware of the problems of using static methods and classes. They can’t use interfaces They can’t use inheritance They are hard to test because you can’t make mocks and stubs Is there a better way ? Obviously we need to be able to access library methods without instantiated classes all the time otherwise our code would become pretty cluttered One possibly solution is to use a new keyword for an old concept: the singleton. Singleton’s are global instances of a class, since they are instances we can use them as we would normal classes. In order to make their use nice and practical we'd need some syntactic sugar however Say that the Math class would be of type singleton instead of an actual class. The actual class containing all the default methods for the Math singleton is DefaultMath, which implements the interface IMath. The singleton would be declared as singleton Math : IMath { public Math { this = new DefaultMath(); } } If we wanted to substitute our own class for all math operations we could make a new class MyMath that inherits DefaultMath, or we could just inherit from the interface IMath and create a whole new Class. To make our class the active Math class, you'd do a simple assignment Math = new MyMath(); and voilá! the next time we call Math.Floor it will call your method. Note that for a normal singleton we'd have to write something like Math.Instance.Floor but the compiler eliminates the need for the Instance property Another idea would be to be able to define a singletons as Lazy so they get instantiated only when they're first called, like lazy singleton Math : IMath What do you think, would it have been a better solution that static methods and classes? Is there any problems with this approach?

    Read the article

  • Why do you have to explicitly specify scope with friendly_id?

    - by nfm
    I'm using the friendly_id gem. I also have my routes nested: # config/routes.rb map.resources :users do |user| user.resources :events end So I have URLs like /users/nfm/events/birthday-2009. In my models, I want the event title to be scoped to the username, so that both nfm and mrmagoo can have events birthday-2009 without them being slugged. # app/models/event.rb def Event < ActiveRecord::Base has_friendly_id :title, :use_slug => true, :scope => :user belongs_to :user ... end I'm also using has_friendly_id :username in my User model. However, in my controller, I'm only pulling out events pertinent to the user who is logged in (current_user): def EventsController < ApplicationController def show @event = current_user.events.find(params[:id]) end ... end This doesn't work; I get the error ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound; expected scope but got none. # This works @event = current_user.events.find(params[:id], :scope => 'nfm') # This doesn't work, even though User has_friendly_id, so current_user.to_param _should_ return "nfm" @event = current_user.events.find(params[:id], :scope => current_user) # But this does work! @event = current_user.events.find(params[:id], :scope => current_user.to_param) SO, why do I need to explicitly specify :scope if I'm restricting it to current_user.events anyway? And why does current_user.to_param need to be called explicitly? Can I override this?

    Read the article

  • How to send keypresses from qt application to libvlc

    - by anon
    I need to send keypresses from my application window to libvlc, how do i do that? I tried using varSetInteger but then i got the following error error: ‘var_SetInteger’ was not declared in this scope so i searched for the file in which var_SetInteger was defined and found that it was defined in vlc_variables.h so in included it and got the following error. What am i missing? ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: ‘__var_Create’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:121: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: ‘__var_Destroy’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:122: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: ‘__var_Change’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:124: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: ‘__var_Type’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:126: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: ‘__var_Set’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:127: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: ‘__var_Get’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:128: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: ‘__var_Command’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:131: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:133: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: ‘__var_AddCallback’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:171: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: ‘__var_DelCallback’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:172: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: ‘__var_TriggerCallback’ has not been declared ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected identifier before ‘(’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected )' before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘...’ before ‘*’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:173: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘)’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: ‘__var_SetInteger’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: expected primary-expression before ‘int’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:202: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: ‘__var_SetBool’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: expected primary-expression before ‘bool’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:216: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: ‘__var_SetTime’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: expected primary-expression before ‘i’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:230: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: ‘__var_SetFloat’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: expected primary-expression before ‘float’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:244: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: ‘__var_SetString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:258: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: ‘__var_SetVoid’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:271: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: ‘__var_GetInteger’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:303: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: ‘__var_GetBool’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:318: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: ‘__var_GetTime’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:333: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: ‘__var_GetFloat’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:348: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: ‘__var_GetString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:363: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: ‘__var_GetNonEmptyString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: ‘obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:372: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: variable or field ‘__var_IncInteger’ declared void ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:412: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: variable or field ‘__var_DecInteger’ declared void ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:424: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: ‘__var_CreateGetInteger’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:438: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: ‘__var_CreateGetBool’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:450: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: ‘__var_CreateGetTime’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:462: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: ‘__var_CreateGetFloat’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:474: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: error: ‘__var_CreateGetString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:486: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:486: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:487: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: error: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyString’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:493: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:493: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:494: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: ‘__var_CreateGetIntegerCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:528: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: ‘__var_CreateGetBoolCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:541: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: ‘__var_CreateGetTimeCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:554: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: ‘__var_CreateGetFloatCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:567: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: error: ‘__var_CreateGetStringCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:580: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:580: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:581: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: error: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyStringCommand’ declared as an ‘inline’ variable ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: error: ‘vlc_object_t’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: error: ‘p_obj’ was not declared in this scope ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:588: error: expected primary-expression before ‘const’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:588: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:589: error: expected ‘,’ or ‘;’ before ‘{’ token src/transcribeWidget.cpp:859: warning: unused parameter ‘bytesSent’ src/transcribeWidget.cpp:859: warning: unused parameter ‘bytesTotal’ ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:201: warning: ‘__var_SetInteger’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:215: warning: ‘__var_SetBool’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:229: warning: ‘__var_SetTime’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:243: warning: ‘__var_SetFloat’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:257: warning: ‘__var_SetString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:270: warning: ‘__var_SetVoid’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:302: warning: ‘__var_GetInteger’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:317: warning: ‘__var_GetBool’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:332: warning: ‘__var_GetTime’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:347: warning: ‘__var_GetFloat’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:362: warning: ‘__var_GetString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:371: warning: ‘__var_GetNonEmptyString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:437: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetInteger’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:449: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetBool’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:461: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetTime’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:473: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetFloat’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:485: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:492: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyString’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:527: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetIntegerCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:540: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetBoolCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:553: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetTimeCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:566: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetFloatCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:579: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetStringCommand’ defined but not used ../vlc-0.9.10/include/vlc_variables.h:587: warning: ‘__var_CreateGetNonEmptyStringCommand’ defined but not used

    Read the article

  • Achieving C# "readonly" behavior in C++

    - by Tommy Fisk
    Hi guys, this is my first question on stack overflow, so be gentle. Let me first explain the exact behavior I would like to see. If you are familiar with C# then you know that declaring a variable as "readonly" allows a programmer to assign some value to that variable exactly once. Further attempts to modify the variable will result in an error. What I am after: I want to make sure that any and all single-ton classes I define can be predictably instantiated exactly once in my program (more details at the bottom). My approach to realizing my goal is to use extern to declare a global reference to the single-ton (which I will later instantiate at a time I choose. What I have sort of looks like this, namespace Global { extern Singleton& mainInstance; // not defined yet, but it will be later! } int main() { // now that the program has started, go ahead and create the singleton object Singleton& Global::mainInstance = Singleton::GetInstance(); // invalid use of qualified name Global::mainInstance = Singleton::GetInstance(); // doesn't work either :( } class Singleton { /* Some details ommited */ public: Singleton& GetInstance() { static Singleton instance; // exists once for the whole program return instance; } } However this does not really work, and I don't know where to go from here. Some details about what I'm up against: I'm concerned about threading as I am working on code that will deal with game logic while communicating with several third-party processes and other processes I will create. Eventually I would have to implement some kind of synchronization so multiple threads could access the information in the Singleton class without worry. Because I don't know what kinds of optimizations I might like to do, or exactly what threading entails (never done a real project using it), I was thinking that being able to predictably control when Singletons were instantiated would be a Good Thing. Imagine if Process A creates Process B, where B contains several Singletons distributed against multiple files and/or libraries. It could be a real nightmare if I can not reliably ensure the order these singleton objects are instantiated (because they could depend on each other, and calling methods on a NULL object is generally a Bad Thing). If I were in C# I would just use the readonly keyword, but is there any way I can implement this (compiler supported) behavior in C++? Is this even a good idea? Thanks for any feedback.

    Read the article

  • Javascript global object calls function?

    - by Troels
    Hello stackoverflow I have a very odd problem with javascript. My code is rather long so here is an example of the structure and the problem: var x = new function f() { this.id = ""; } function g(obj) { if (x.id == "") { ... obj.firstChild.setAttribute("onclick", "javascript:o();"); ... x.id = obj.id; } else if (x.id != obj.id) { ... x.id = ""; g(obj); } } function o() { ... if (something == something) { ... } else { ... x.id = ""; // if-statement of the g() function is called here? } } As you can see, the if-statement of the g() function is for some reason called or re-run upon x.id being changed. I simply cannot understand this, because they are not in the same scope, and changing a variable should under no circumstances trigger anything? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >