Search Results

Search found 8707 results on 349 pages for 'mozilla firefox'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 112/349 | < Previous Page | 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119  | Next Page >

  • How to enjoy Firefox with their lot&rsquo;s of version.

    - by anirudha
    many developer want to use many version of a application. Firefox have not facility to stand alone installation but here is a trick to enjoy their nightly and stable version both. make a folder anywhere in your system. make two folder the name depend on your choice. in first install the Firefox Nightly and second install the current stable version 3.6.12 now the application already add to your start menu otherwise add them manually. now you can use both version nightly and stable. if you deug your web application in IDE such as visual studio or other then they force to open the default browser set in your system they open the version who you use last time. if you use last time nightly then they open your web-application in nightly otherwise in current stable version.

    Read the article

  • Firefox 4 tiendra-t-il ses très nombreuses promesses ? Début de réponse avec sa première beta prévue

    Mise à jour du 11/05/10 Firefox 4 tiendra-t-il ses très nombreuses promesses ? Début de réponse avec sa première beta prévue pour juin Le cahier des charges de Firefox 4 est bien rempli. On savait déjà que l'interface graphique serait totalement revue (lire ci-avant). On en sait à présent d'avantage sur le reste du navigateur. Mike Beltzner, directeur du développement de la Fondation Mozilla, a fixé hier les nombreux objectifs à atteindre lors d'un Webcast sous forme de feuille de route. L'objectif le plus important reste certainement celui de la puissance et de la vitesse. La puissance d'u...

    Read the article

  • Firefox pour Android : première version finale plus rapide et plus ergonomique, et avec le support du Flash

    Firefox pour Android : première beta pour la nouvelle version Avec des performances très intéressantes et un « Awesome Screen » Le nouveau projet de Firefox sur Android avance à grands pas. La beta vient en effet d'arriver sur Google Play (ex-Android Market). Pour l'instant, le navigateur n'est disponible que sur smartphone et uniquement en anglais mais le début reste prometteur. « Cette beta est très spéciale parce que nous avons beaucoup travaillé dessus pour lui ajouter des fonctionnalités, améliorer ses performances et résoudre les problèmes pour que la navigation soit plus rapide et plus simple », explique Mozilla en marge de ce lancement. Le travail sur...

    Read the article

  • WebGL 1.0, spécification finalisée pour la bibliothèques d'accélération 3D libre soutenue par Chrome, Firefox, Opera et Safari

    La spécification de WebGL 1.0 est finalisée Pour la bibliothèques d'accélération 3D libre soutenue par Chrome, Firefox, Opera et Safari Ces dernier temps, vous avez entendu parler de la mise en place de WebGL dans les nouvelles versions des différents navigateurs web. Comme vous devez déjà le savoir, Firefox 4, Google Chrome 9 (rendez-vous à l'adresse "about:flags" pour activer WebGL supportent la nouvelle technologie (également soutenue par Apple pour Safari et par Opera). Khronos, un consortium de constructeurs de cartes graphiques (NVidia, AMD, Imagination Technologies, ...) et de différents grand acteurs dans le monde de la 3D (Activision, Epic Games, ...) annonce dur...

    Read the article

  • Une 13ème bêta sera-t-elle nécessaire pour Firefox 4 ? Les développeurs du navigateur laissent entendre que oui

    Une 13ème bêta sera-t-elle nécessaire pour Firefox 4 ? Les développeurs du navigateur laissent entendre que oui Mise à jour du 18.02.2011 par Katleen Malgré la sortie il y a dix jours de la onzième bêta de Firefox 4, le navigateur est toujours très en retard. Et, pour son équipe de développement, l'histoire n'est pas encore terminée. Une douzième bêta est sur les rails, et ne devrait plus tarder à arriver (dans quelques jours, les derniers bogues sont en train d'y être corrigés). Cette nouvelle mouture "est la dernière prévue", souligne la Fondation Mozilla, qui n'exclut cependant pas le recours à une treizième bêta. "Nous nous réservons ce droit, si les p...

    Read the article

  • How to troubleshoot rendering differences between Chrome/IE and Firefox? [on hold]

    - by user32548
    I have a personal website and just realized that the display is very different between Firefox (tested 19.0.2 and 25) and Chrome 30.0.1599.101 m Firefox display (this is how I intended it to look. In Chrome & IE9.0 the DIVs all seem to stagger on their own..... ? Im just an amateur and this is my personal blog for fun, Ive never had to troubleshoot a rendering issue like this one. Not sure how to go about doing it? Can Firebug help with determining where layout is inherited from? I have sample HTML if needed but didn't want to cloud up the questions a wall of text.

    Read the article

  • Multiple thunderbird Icons in System Tray(Windows 7) & TaskBar

    - by chobo2
    Is this some new "feature" for thunderbird 8? When I start thunderbird it starts by opening thunderbird. Once it is loading thunderbird it loads another 6 thunderbirds. The windows are called Mozilla Thunderbird Inbox - [email protected] - Mozilla Thuderbird Inbox - [email protected] - Mozilla Thuderbird Inbox - [email protected] - Mozilla Thuderbird Inbox - [email protected] - Mozilla Thuderbird (yes it repeats the same one a few times) Inbox - [email protected] - Mozilla Thuderbird I have 7 email accounts but for whatever reason it only made 3 windows. What happened to the one window? When I minimize to tray I got 4 of thunderbird icons. When closing one of them all of the close. My other windows 7(32 bit not 64 bit) only have one instance.

    Read the article

  • Website. AJAX and FIREFOX problems. I dont think Firefox likes ajax..?

    - by DJDonaL3000
    Working on an AJAX website (HTML,CSS,JavaScript, AJAX, PHP, MySQL). I have multiple javascript functions which take rows from mysql, wrap them in html tags, and embed them in the HTML (the usual usage of AJAX). THE PROBLEM: Everything is working perfect, except when I run the site with Firefox (for once its not InternetExplorer causing the trouble). The site is currently in the developmental stage, so its offline, but running on the localhost (WampServer, apache, Windows XP SP3,VISTA,7). All other cross-browser conflicts have been removed, and works perfectly on all major browsers including IE, Chrome, Opera and Safari, but I get absolutely nothing from the HTTPRequest (AJAX) if the browser is Firefox. All browsers have the latest versions. THE CODE: I have a series of javascript functions, all of which are structured as follows: function getDatay(){ var a = document.getElementById( 'item' ).innerHTML; var ajaxRequest; try{//Browser Support Code: // code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari: ajaxRequest = new XMLHttpRequest(); } catch (e){ // code for IE6, IE5: try{ ajaxRequest = new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP"); } catch (e) { try{ ajaxRequest = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } catch (e){ // Something went wrong alert("Your browser is not compatible - Browser Incompatibility Issue."); return false; } } } // Create a function that will receive data sent from the server ajaxRequest.onreadystatechange = function(){ if(ajaxRequest.readyState < 4){ document.getElementById( 'theDiv' ).innerHTML = 'LOADING...'; } if(ajaxRequest.readyState == 4){ document.getElementById( 'theDiv' ).innerHTML = ajaxRequest.responseText; } } //Post vars to PHP Script and wait for response: var url="01_retrieve_data_7.php"; url=url+"?a="+a; ajaxRequest.open("POST", url, false);//must be false here to wait for ajaxRequest to complete. ajaxRequest.send(null); } My money is on the final five lines of code being the cause of the problem. Any suggestions how to get Firefox and AJAX working together are most welcome...

    Read the article

  • How to report a malicious site to Google, Microsoft, Mozilla, etc. so that they will warn users

    - by Jayapal Chandran
    I completed a project a year ago. Now a few modification were needed. While trying to test the site, there was an index.html file with a malicious script which had an iframe to another site's jar file. Kaspersky antivirus blocked it. I browsed via ftp to find the file and I deleted it. I also disabled directory listing. Maybe the ftp details of the site owner would have been hacked. I want to report this site to Google, Microsoft, Mozilla, and other antivirus providers. How do I do that? I hope kaspersky would have updated it in their database, but I still want to explicitly report this. Here is the popup kaspersky showed:

    Read the article

  • how to report a malicious site (http://newss.gr) to google, microsoft and mozilla so that they will prompt

    - by Jayapal Chandran
    Hi, I completed a project an year ago. Now a few modification were needed. While i try to test there was an index.html with a malicious script which had an iframe to this site's jar file. and kaspersky anti virus blocked it. So i browsed the ftp to find the file and i deleted it. and also disabled directory listing. May be the ftp details of the site owner would have been hacked. I want to report this site to google, msn and mozilla and other antivirus programs. How to do that. any idea? I hope kaspersky would have updated it in their database but still i want to explicitly inform it about this. here is the popup kaspersky showed.

    Read the article

  • Dictionary-based text auto-completion in Windows (i.e. Mozilla Thunderbird e-mail client)?

    - by None
    Most programmer's text editors and IDEs have it, automatic completion of the first few characters (letters) of a keyword or function name. Also, most address bars or search fields feature this (like the tag input below the posting form). I would like the same for a few, often-occuring words in business correspondance. Since I could not find an extension for the application in question, Mozilla Thunderbird, I would like to know if there are applications or methods that suggest the complete words from a dictionary like sup per eruser erfluent PS: Here's an article on Wikipedia: Word completion Here's a product for $25: Type Booster Ideally, the solution is free.

    Read the article

  • getting firewatir to run on mac osx: jssh problems

    - by z3cko
    I am trying to get firewatir to run on Mac OSX Leopard. I have Firefox 3.6rc2 installed but running the most simple script does not work: require 'rubygems' require 'firewatir' ff=FireWatir::Firefox.new ff.goto("http://mail.yahoo.com") i am getting the following error /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/firewatir-1.6.5/lib/firewatir/firefox.rb:237:in `set_defaults': Unable to connect to machine : 127.0.0.1 on port 9997. Make sure that JSSh is properly installed and Firefox is running with '-jssh' option (Watir::Exception::UnableToStartJSShException) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/firewatir-1.6.5/lib/firewatir/firefox.rb:131:in `initialize' from ./watir-test.rb:12:in `new' from ./watir-test.rb:12 even when I am trying to start Firefox with the -jssh option, I get an error (although another one) /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin -jssh the error output in that case: /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/firewatir-1.6.5/lib/firewatir/firefox.rb:125:in `initialize': Firefox is running without -jssh (RuntimeError) is there any tutorial or hnt to get firewatir actually running on Mac OSX?

    Read the article

  • How can I switch to a tag/branch in hg?

    - by n179911
    Hi, I have followed the documentation in https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Developer_Guide/Source_Code/Mercurial And I have download FF source using this: hg clone http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ src But how can i switch to the FF3.6 'branch' or 'tag'? The documentation said 'hg clone http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.2/ 192src' but I don't want to clone both FF main and Ff3.6 twice? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Apache logs 200 instead of 404

    - by elle
    I've been getting the following in my apache access log: "GET /work//?module=www&section=working=../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../..//proc/self/environ%0000 HTTP/1.1" 200 5187 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl-PL; rv:1.8.1.24pre) Gecko/20100228 K-Meleon/1.5.4\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/540.0 (KHTML,like Gecko) Chrome/9.1.0.0 Safari/540.0\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Comodo_Dragon/4.1.1.11 Chrome/4.1.249.1042 Safari/532.5\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.0.16) Gecko/2009122206 Firefox/3.0.16 Flock/2.5.6\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Maxthon/3.0.8.2 Safari/533.1\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20070928 Firefox/2.0.0.7 Navigator/9.0RC1\",\"Opera/9.99 (Windows NT 5.1; U; pl) Presto/9.9.9\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; zh-HK) AppleWebKit/533.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Safari/533.18.5\",\"Seamonkey-1.1.13-1(X11; U; GNU Fedora fc 10) Gecko/20081112\",\"Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; Trident/5.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; SLCC2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; Zune 4.0; Tablet PC 2.0; InfoPath.3; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)\",\"Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.3)" If I try the URL, I get a 404 instead of 200 which the above request received. Is there a way I can confirm that the 200 was real and not spoofed? Where is the long info on the client coming from?

    Read the article

  • Printing special / extended characters on web page - Firefox or printer issue?

    - by edmicman
    My dad brought this to my attention and I'm looking into it, but thought I'd post here and see if anyone has any ideas... He's running Win7, using Firefox and printing to a wireless connected Brother HL-2170W printer. He's got a web page (http://cornandsoybeandigest.com/inputs/fertilizer/applying-nitrogen-after-planting-0512/index.html) that has extended/special characters in it - the funny "a" in Fernandez. The characters show correctly in Firefox on the page. He printed it, and the extended "a" printed as a diamond with a question mark. He says it shows that way in the print preview, too. I pulled up the same page in Ubuntu, Firefox, and it displayed in my print preview and physically printed everything correctly. I just checked on my wife's Win7 PC in Firefox and the print preview looked correct on her system, too. We have a Brother 2040 here. Soooo, my question is, is this possibly a problem in the browser somehow, or the printer driver? I'm leaning towards the printer driver now, but I can't say I've run into this before. Is it a setting somewhere? I just installed this printer for him the other day, using the CD that came with it; I could try updating the driver from Brother's website I guess. Is there anything else I should look at or check? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why do local HTML files take longer to load in IE compared to Firefox?

    - by jaslr
    I am creating a local HTML file that links to 2 external CSS files and 3 external JS files. When I refresh this in Internet Explorer 9, the page takes over a minute to load compared to instantly in Firefox (latest stable build. When I remove the external CSS and JS references, IE9 loads the page instantly. Can anyone explain why IE9 takes so long to load local HTML files with references to external CSS and JS files?

    Read the article

  • Is IE9 a modern browser?

    - by anirudha
    Is IE9 a modern browser? i show you a post who compare IE as well as they compare chrome. Is IE9 a modern browser? well Are you thing that they make something bettter then thing another that what Firefox and chrome do whenever Microsoft do this. that's point that Microsoft always blast IE because they make version upon version not upon update like Firefox make 3.6.14 after 3.6.13 and chrome give update soon as possible but IE not come soon. they will thing for making 10 instead of giving update on 9. well what they tell us new. they make fool public everytime i believe they make fool public as same as today they maked for version 9 they show developer tool in 9 have three new tabs or pael are this enough. whenever  in chrome and firefox their is many plugin who make development easier IE still have a developer tool who not have enough power like Firebug in Firefox. they show performance but forget luna user [window xp] and their IE never runs on other plateform but chrome and firefox can. no customization in IE whenever chrome and firefox have uncountable plugin and addons. show features now in IE who already implemented in firefox very early. well their is no rule that static goes right every time not sure that IE and Firefox both are right in their language. their is no one predict what thing goes better in future. so well keep a thing in mind never wasted time and also thing to make task easier even you need to use sollution opensource or closesoure inside or outside MS does not matter. well everyone tell you much more then they do even IE and some other. they never tell you this thing not in IE but in another can be found they never tell you use other whenever you need a thing and never can be found in their software. you need to more beware of IE because they make them commorcial not really for public if really then why they stop wxp user to use them as well firefox and chrome never force. because they need a thing that force more then more copy of windows sale. so they thing to add a thing in window 8. the IE9 they thing to make before that they thing to make  this for windows 8. they always force user to purchase this for this. this for this. and this trick sell their software. well outside MS Mozilla and Chrome all behave better with user and their feedback. they respect user their privacy and feedback. if you not believe that how much problem you found in IE and they got solved soon as in chrome and firefox bug kill soon. because IE not opensource we need to  boycutt them secondly their is no customization then they make user task easier even with twitter and facebook.

    Read the article

  • Firefox 23 n'autorise plus la désactivation de JavaScript, l'utilisateur devrait-il avoir le choix où le Web sans JavaScript est désormais stupide ?

    Firefox 23 n'autorise plus la désactivation de JavaScript L'utilisateur devrait-il avoir le choix ou le Web sans JavaScript est-il désormais stupide ?JavaScript devient omniprésent et quasiment incontournable dans l'écosystème du Web.Développé à la base comme un simple langage de script qui devait permettre de rendre des pages Web interactives, JavaScript peut être désactivé via une option dans les navigateurs.Pour le développeur, cette option permet de voir comment peut fonctionner son application Web sans JavaScript et pour l'utilisateur, la désactivation de JavaScript devait permettre d'éviter les popup publicitaires intrusifs, le chargement rapide des pages ou de bénéficier de plus de sécuri...

    Read the article

  • Compared to Firefox 4 and Google Chrome 10, what can't IE9 do?

    - by ClosureCowboy
    If a website works in Firefox 4 and in Google Chrome 10, what could potentially cause that website not to work (broken layout or broken JavaScript) in IE9? What limitations and differences does IE9 have, aside from vendor-specific stylesheet rules? Yes, that is a painfully vague question — that's because I am not asking this question from the perspective of someone with a specific problem! I'm asking this question from the perspective of someone with a working website who does not have access to IE9.

    Read the article

  • Parts de marché : Firefox franchit à nouveau le cap des 20%, IE progresse tandis que Chrome baisse pour le 3e mois consécutif

    Parts de marché : IE progresse de nouveau faible évolution de Chrome et baisse pour Firefox Mise à jour du 03/05/2012, par Hinault Romaric La publication du classement des navigateurs pour le mois d'avril par NetApplications vient confirmer un regain d'intérêt pour Internet Explorer. Le navigateur de Microsoft semble bien se porter depuis le début de cette année et n'enregistre non plus des baisses au fil des mois, mais également des gains de parts de marché. En avril, IE est repassé au-dessus de la barre des 54% des parts de marché avec un score de 54,09%, contre 53,83 au mois de mars.

    Read the article

  • Des attaquants pourraient savoir quels sites vous avez visité sur IE, Chrome et Firefox d'après les recherches d'un ingénieur Belge

    Des attaquants pourraient savoir quels sites vous avez visité sur IE, Chrome et Firefox d'après les recherches d'un ingénieur Belge En 2010 des chercheurs de l'université de Californie du Sud ont mené une analyse sur plus de 40 sites qui espionnaient les habitudes de navigation des utilisateurs. Parmi eux figuraient YouPorn.com qui se targue d'être le YouTube de son domaine et utilisait du code JavaScript pour savoir si les visiteurs avaient visité récemment des sites concurrents. En combinant...

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119  | Next Page >