when we press a key and keep pressing it the keypress and keydown event continuously fires.
Is there a way to let these fire only after a complete cycle ,eg keydown and then key up.
I would like the user not to be able press the key continuously rather would like the user have to press then release the key board to type a character !
so that following case do not occur eg : pppppppppppppppppppppppp when user presses 'p' for 1 sec.
With all the new CSS3 border stuff going on (-webkit...) is it now possible to add a border to your font ? (like the solid white border around the blue Twitter logo). If not, are there any not-to-ugly hacks that will accomplish this in CSS/XHTML or do I still need to fire up Photoshop
Last some days Google blocked my site in fire fox web browser. I passed all the test, but site files have no virus and other effected things. Please help me to solve the problem.
Hi,
according to some reviews on Amazon, the AIMA 3rd Edition is quite a disappointment... minor update not worth the money. In your opinion, which is then a more suitable introductory textbook on artificial intelligence?
Hey guys
I am looking for a SIP book similar to this one on XMPP - Professional XMPP Programming with Javascript and Jquery (http://www.amazon.com/Professional-Programming-JavaScript-jQuery-Programmer/dp/0470540710)
I am new to the area and any resources would be appreciated, thanks
I am currently trying to create a test suite for my javascript apps. My problem is that, it seems I cannot get access to init() from my utils object, as you can see below:
I have my app that follow a singleton pattern:
var appModal = function () {
var utils = Object.create(moduleUtils);
function init(caller, options ) {
}
}();
My test suite is in moduleUtils, this is a object literal converted to a prototype
moduleUtils.debug = {
addSlideTest : function(){
/* this function cannot fire init() from appModal */
}}
Consider a asp:dropdownlist which fires SelectedIndexChangedEvent based on listitem index.....
But why the event doesn't fire for the same listitem index when selected again....
Is there something similar to jQuery's live()-method in dojo? I have some content that's being loaded with ajax, and need that content to get the same event connections.
dojo.query(".allTheseElements").connect("onclick", function() { /***/ }
And then have the dynamically loaded content fire on this too.
I want to learn x86 assembly and I want to know if learning reverse engineering is a good way to learn it? Also I have some c++ knowledge of pointers, stack, heap , references, etc.. I was considering this book.
http://www.amazon.com/Reversing-Secrets-Engineering-Eldad-Eilam/dp/0764574817/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1340420512&sr=1-1&keywords=reverse+engineering
Also Is reverse engineering the same as what they call disassembly?
I think my title says it all. I have a modal dialog showing up and the user can make some changes and then click a 'Save' button. I need that to totally post back the whole page. What would you suggest? I just assumed the button would fire off regardless of the jQuery.
I know C and C++ and I have some experience with Java, but I don't know too much about Algorithms and Data Structures.
I did a search on Amazon, but I don't know what book should I choose. I don't want a book which put its basis only on the theoretic part; I want the practical part too (probably more than the theoretical one :) ).
I don't want the code to be implemented in a certain language, but if is in Java, probably I would happier. :)
Hi everyone,
i am working with a select. I want to trigger and event when the user select a value.
I am using the event "change", the problem is that if a user open the select but choose the same option that is selected, the triggers doesn't fire.
Is there a way to capture the event when a user select an option independently if the option is the same than is the one that was selected?
thanks.
In Mac OS, Fire fox Version 3.6.3 is blocking XMLHttp Object in one machine but it didn't block in same set of OS and browser versions in other machine. Is there any way to enable or disable xmlhttp from browser?
I am using this plugin: http://wiki.github.com/augustl/live-validations/ to check if the form field entered is valid or not. How do i disable the live validation for keypress and instead make it only fire when the submit button is clicked?
Still trying to get my problems with page loaders firing like crazy in JSF
From this link: http://www.javabeat.net/tips/122-jsf-best-practices.html
It appears that if I put a that it will fire once when entering the page.
However, it fires like 4 times when LEAVING the page, kind of defeats the point. Any ideas?
I have a button control. Once the user clicks on it, the click event should fire and then the button should get disabled. How can I do this? I have the option to use JQuery or JavasSript or both.
Here is my button declaration:
<asp:Button
ID="Button1"
runat="server"
Text="Click Me"
onclick="Button1_Click"
/>
On the button click code behind, I have added a Response.Write(). That should get executed and then the button should be disabled
After being convinced ("schooled") that Swing apps on Mac do look native, I'm trying to make mine look as native as possible. Everything looks great, but when I hit command-Q or do it from the menu, my windowStateChanged(WindowEvent e) is not firing on my main JFrame (if I exit in any other way, it does fire). How can I respond to the real Apple quit?
I'm using sqlite for the persistent store, so could I just upload the .sqlite file to, for example, Amazon S3 as a way of providing users with the ability to backup their app data?
Then for restoring just download it back and replace the existing .sqlite file in the app's folder.
Does anybody see any issues with that? Has anyone done it? Any other suggestions on how to implement data backup feature?
I am working with an insert trigger within a Sybase database. I know I can access the @@nestlevel to determine whether I am being called directly or as a result of another trigger or procedure.
Is there any way to determine, when the nesting level is deeper than 1, who performed the action causing the trigger to fire?
For example, was the table inserted to directly, was it inserted into by another trigger and if so, which one.
I'm building an firebug-like inspection tool for my page. When the mouse enters an element, the element should be highlighted.
Now I'm creating an element which I position absolute on top of the target element, this however means the next mousemove event (which is bound to the document) will fire with the actual "highlight element" as the target.
Is there a way to prevent the "highlight element" from being the target element in the mousemove event? The element already has a transparant background.
It's been a mystery how does Cell Minute Tracker manage to fetch AT&T users data.
Maybe someone here has the long waited answer.
I'm really curious rather they got a confirmation to scrape user’s cellular report
And how they can fire up multiple requests to AT&T site without being banned?
I'm waiting for someone who could shed some light on this mystery
Thanks
link: http://www.uquery.com/apps/311637771-cell-minute-tracker-for-att
If my Ajax call returns a successful result, but while processing the result I cause an exception, the error handler fires. This seems counter intuitive to me as I think the error handler should only fire when an error occurs as a result of making the Ajax call or via a server-side error. I am trying to use the Ajax function in a unit test so I would like to tell the difference between the two different failure scenarios.
I have one small online sale business but I want to make it scalable at limited expense and so am looking out at various services which can help me make my business scalable.
I was looking into Amazon Web Services and it seems to be a viable option.
Are there any other ways for adding scalability to small online businesses ?
Back when I was at school, I remember tinkering with a Mac game where you programmed little robots in a sort of pseudo-assembler language which could then battle each other. They could move themselves around the arena, look for opponents in different directions, and fire some sort of weapon. Pretty basic stuff, but I remember it quite fondly, even if I can't remember the name.
Are there any good modern day equivalents?