Search Results

Search found 14260 results on 571 pages for 'regex group'.

Page 140/571 | < Previous Page | 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147  | Next Page >

  • Group keywords by site

    - by Skudd
    I am finding a lot of useful help here today, and I really appreciate it. This should be the last one for the day: I have a list of the top 10 keywords per site, sorted by visits, by date. The records need to be sorted as follows (excuse the formatting): 2010-05 2010-04 site1.com keyword1 apples wine keyword1 visits 100 12 keyword2 oranges water keyword2 visits 99 10 site2.com keyword1 blueberry cornbread keyword1 visits 90 100 keyword2 squares biscuits keyword2 visits 80 99 Basically what I need to accomplish involves grouping, but I can't seem to figure it out. Am I heading down the right path, or is there another way to achieve this, or is it just impossible?

    Read the article

  • How to split a space separated file?

    - by simplesimon
    Hi I am trying to import this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_continent_%28data_file%29 which is of the format like: AS AF AFG 004 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of EU AX ALA 248 Åland Islands EU AL ALB 008 Albania, Republic of AF DZ DZA 012 Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of OC AS ASM 016 American Samoa EU AD AND 020 Andorra, Principality of AF AO AGO 024 Angola, Republic of NA AI AIA 660 Anguilla if i do <? explode(" ",$data"); ?> that works fine apart from countries with more than 1 word. how can i split it so i get the first 4 bits of data (the chars/ints) and the 5th bit of data being whatever remains? this is in php thank you

    Read the article

  • How do I convert CamelCase into human-readable names in Java?

    - by Frederik
    I'd like to write a method that converts CamelCase into a human-readable name. Here's the test case: public void testSplitCamelCase() { assertEquals("lowercase", splitCamelCase("lowercase")); assertEquals("Class", splitCamelCase("Class")); assertEquals("My Class", splitCamelCase("MyClass")); assertEquals("HTML", splitCamelCase("HTML")); assertEquals("PDF Loader", splitCamelCase("PDFLoader")); assertEquals("A String", splitCamelCase("AString")); assertEquals("Simple XML Parser", splitCamelCase("SimpleXMLParser")); assertEquals("GL 11 Version", splitCamelCase("GL11Version")); }

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter Routes for filename with extension

    - by thehuby
    I am using codeigniter and its routes system successfully with some lovely regexp, however I have come unstuck on what should be an easy peasy thing in the system. I want to include a bunch of search engine related files (for Google webmaster etc.) plus the robots.txt file, all in a controller. So, I have create the controller and updated the routes file and don't seem to be able to get it working with these files. Here's a snip from my routes file: $route['robots\.txt|LiveSearchSiteAuth\.xml'] = 'search_controller/files'; Within the function I use the URI helper to figure out which content to show. Now I can't get this to match, which points to my regexp being wrong. I'm sure this is a really obvious one but its late and my caffeine tank is empty :)

    Read the article

  • How do you implement a good profanity filter?

    - by Ben Throop
    Many of us need to deal with user input, search queries, and situations where the input text can potentially contain profanity or undesirable language. Oftentimes this needs to be filtered out. Where can one find a good list of swear words in various languages and dialects? Are there APIs available to sources that contain good lists? Or maybe an API that simply says "yes this is clean" or "no this is dirty" with some parameters? What are some good methods for catching folks trying to trick the system, like a$$, azz, or a55? Bonus points if you offer solutions for PHP. :) Edit: Response to answers that say simply avoid the programmatic issue: I think there is a place for this kind of filter when, for instance, a user can use public image search to find pictures that get added to a sensitive community pool. If they can search for "penis", then they will likely get many pictures of, yep. If we don't want pictures of that, then preventing the word as a search term is a good gatekeeper, though admittedly not a foolproof method. Getting the list of words in the first place is the real question. So I'm really referring to a way to figure out of a single token is dirty or not and then simply disallow it. I'd not bother preventing a sentiment like the totally hilarious "long necked giraffe" reference. Nothing you can do there. :)

    Read the article

  • Pulling out two separate words from a string using reg expressions?

    - by Marvin
    I need to improve on a regular expression I'm using. Currently, here it is: ^[a-zA-Z\s/-]+ I'm using it to pull out medication names from a variety of formulation strings, for example: SULFAMETHOXAZOLE-TRIMETHOPRIM 200-40 MG/5ML PO SUSP AMOX TR/POTASSIUM CLAVULANATE 125 mg-31.25 mg ORAL TABLET, CHEWABLE AMOXICILLIN TRIHYDRATE 125 mg ORAL TABLET, CHEWABLE AMOX TR/POTASSIUM CLAVULANATE 125 mg-31.25 mg ORAL TABLET, CHEWABLE Amoxicillin 1000 MG / Clavulanate 62.5 MG Extended Release Tablet The resulting matches on these examples are: SULFAMETHOXAZOLE-TRIMETHOPRIM AMOX TR/POTASSIUM CLAVULANATE AMOXICILLIN TRIHYDRATE AMOX TR/POTASSIUM CLAVULANATE Amoxicillin The first four are what I want, but on the fifth, I really need "Amoxicillin / Clavulanate". How would I pull out patterns like "Amoxicillin / Clavulanate" (in fifth row) while missing patterns like "MG/5 ML" (in the first row)?

    Read the article

  • postgres - regex_replace in distinct clause?

    - by n00b0101
    Ok... changing the question here... I'm getting an error when I try this: SELECT COUNT ( DISTINCT mid, regexp_replace(na_fname, '\\s*', '', 'g'), regexp_replace(na_lname, '\\s*', '', 'g')) FROM masterfile; Is it possible to use regexp in a distinct clause like this? The error is this: WARNING: nonstandard use of \\ in a string literal LINE 1: ...CT COUNT ( DISTINCT mid, regexp_replace(na_fname, '\\s*', ''...

    Read the article

  • data in mysql show after barcode split and matches character

    - by klox
    i need some code for the next step..this my first step: <script> $("#mod").change(function() { var barcode; barCode=$("#mod").val(); var data=barCode.split(" "); $("#mod").val(data[0]); $("#seri").val(data[1]); var str=data[0]; var matches=str.matches(/EE|[EJU]).*(D)/i); }); </script> after matches..i want the result can connect to data base then show data from table inside <div id="value">...how to do that?

    Read the article

  • Regexp: Replace only in specific context

    - by blinry
    In a text, I would like to replace all occurrences of $word by [$word]($word) (to create a link in Markdown), but only if it is not already in a link. Example: [$word homepage](http://w00tw00t.org) should not become [[$word]($word) homepage](http://w00tw00t.org). Thus, I need to check whether $word is somewhere between [ and ] and only replace if it's not the case. Can you think of a preg_replace command for this?

    Read the article

  • How can I split a string by whitespace unless inside of a single quoted string?

    - by Kivin
    I'm seeking a solution to splitting a string which contains text in the following format: "abcd efgh 'ijklm no pqrs' tuv" which will produce the following results: ['abcd', 'efgh', 'ijklm no pqrs', 'tuv'] In other words, it splits by whitespace unless inside of a single quoted string. I think it could be done with .NET regexps using "Lookaround" operators, particularly balancing operators. I'm not so sure about Perl.

    Read the article

  • Regexp that matches user-agents of end-user browsers but NOT crawlers with >90 % accuracy

    - by knorv
    I'm trying to construct a regexp that will evaluate to true for User-Agent:s of "browsers navigated by humans", but false for bots. Needless to say the matching will not be exact, but if it gets things right in say 90 % of cases that is more than good enough. My approach so far is to target the User-Agent string of the the five major desktop browsers (MSIE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera). Specifically I want the regexp NOT to match if the user-agent is a bot (Googlebot, msnbot, etc.). Currently I'm using the following regexp which appears to achieve the desired precision: ^(Mozilla.*(Gecko|KHTML|MSIE|Presto|Trident)|Opera).*$ I've observed small number of false negatives which are mostly mobile browsers. The exceptions all match: (BlackBerry|HTC|LG|MOT|Nokia|NOKIAN|PLAYSTATION|PSP|SAMSUNG|SonyEricsson) My question is: Given the desired accuracy level, how would you improve the regexp? Can you think of any major false positives or false negatives to the given regexp? Please note that the question is specifically about regexp-based User-Agent matching. There are a bunch of other approaches to solving this problem, but those are out of the scope of this question.

    Read the article

  • stripping a query string with php (preg_replace)

    - by pg
    http://www.chuckecheese.com/rotator.php?cheese=4&id=1 I want to take out the id, leaving the cheese to stand alone. I tried: $qs = preg_replace("[^&id=*]" ,'',$_SERVER[QUERY_STRING]); But that said I was using an improper modifier. I want to remove "$id=" and whatever number comes after it. Are regexp really as hard as they seem for me?

    Read the article

  • Building a regexp to split a string

    - by Kivin
    I'm seeking a solution to splitting a string which contains text in the following format: "abcd efgh 'ijklm no pqrs' tuv" which will produce the following results: ['abcd', 'efgh', 'ijklm no pqrs', 'tuv'] In otherwords, it splits by whitespace unless inside of a single quoted string. I think it could be done with .NET regexps using "Lookaround" operators, particularly balancing operators. I'm not so sure about perl.

    Read the article

  • How to add ACTIVE DIRECTORY user to Sharepoint group

    - by standley-nguyen
    Hi all. I got an exception when executing this snippet code SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate() { using (SPSite site = new SPSite(siteUrl.Trim())) { using (SPWeb web = site.OpenWeb()) { try { web.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true; SPUser spUser = web.AllUsers[userName]; if (spUser != null) { SPGroup spGroup = web.Groups[groupName]; if (spGroup != null) spGroup.AddUser(spUser); } } catch (Exception ex) { this.TraceData(LogLevel.Error, "Error at function Named [AddUserToSPGroupWidget.AddUserToGroup] . With Error Message: " + ex.ToString()); } finally { web.AllowUnsafeUpdates = false; } } } }); PLease guide me. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Regular expression for email

    - by Nadeem
    I tried the reg expression ^([a-zA-Z0-9_.-])+@([a-zA-Z0-9_.-])+\.([a-zA-Z])+([a-zA-Z])+ for the email validation. Since I want the user to allow submitting even with the empty email address. So I changed the reg ex to (^([a-zA-Z0-9_.-])+@([a-zA-Z0-9_.-])+\.([a-zA-Z])+([a-zA-Z])+)? But this expression accepts any email address without any validation.

    Read the article

  • regular expression of 0's and 1's

    - by Lopa
    Hello all I got this question which asks me to figure out why is it foolish to write a regular expression for the language that consists of strings of 0's and 1's that are palindromes( they read the same backwards and forwards). part 2 of the question says using any formal mechanism of your choice, show how it is possible to express the language that consists of strings of 0's and 1's that are palindromes?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147  | Next Page >