Search Results

Search found 636 results on 26 pages for 'serializable'.

Page 15/26 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • Serialize a generic collection specifying element names for items in the collection

    - by mdresser
    I have a simple class derived from a generic list of string as follows: [Serializable] [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlRoot("TestItems")] public class TemplateRoleCollection : List<string> { } when I serialize this, I get the following XML: <TestItems> <string>cat</string> <string>dog</string> <string>wolf</string> </TestItems> Is there any way to override the xml element name which is used for serializing items in the collection? I would like the following xml to be produced: <TestItems> <TestItem>cat</TestItem> <TestItem>dog</TestItem> <TestItem>wolf</TestItem> </TestItems>

    Read the article

  • MessageContract serialization with DCS

    - by kurtaj
    Is there a way to make the DataContractSerializer serialize a [MessageContract] the same way it appears when transmitted over SOAP? I have a class that appears as follows on the wire for a WCF call: <TestRequest xmlns="http://webservices.test.com/ServiceTest/1.1"> <Name>Just Me</Name> </TestRequest> When serializing using the DCS, it looks like this: <TestRequest xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" z:Id="1" xmlns:z="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/" xmlns="http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/ServiceTest"> <_x003C_Name_x003E_k__BackingField z:Id="2">Just Me</_x003C_Name_x003E_k__BackingField> </TestRequest> I'm convinced this inconsistency is because my class is marked up as a message contract instead of a data contract: [MessageContract] [Serializable] public class TestRequest { [MessageBodyMember] public string Name { get; set; } } Is there a way to make the DCS serialize messages the same way WCF does when it creates a SOAP message?

    Read the article

  • read java.security.key stored as object inside a file which is in jar

    - by Tal
    I saved a PublicKey instance in a file using ObjectOutputStream. This file is then stored inside a jar file which is then loaded by JBoss. I'm trying to read this file but it throws me an exception telling that it's not serializable. Here is the code : InputStream input = KeyLoader.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(resource); ObjectInputStream objectInputStream = new ObjectInputStream(input); Object obj = objectInputStream.readObject(); Key output = (Key) obj; objectInputStream.close(); return output; which throws me this exception An exception occurred: java.io.NotSerializableException

    Read the article

  • Creating a method that is simultaneously an instance and class method

    - by Mike Axiak
    In Python, I'd like to be able to create a function that behaves both as a class function and an instance method, but with the ability to change behaviors. The use case for this is for a set of serializable objects and types. As an example: >>> class Thing(object): #... >>> Thing.to_json() 'A' >>> Thing().to_json() 'B' I know that given the definition of classmethod() in funcobject.c in the Python source, this looks like it'd be simple with a C module. Is there a way to do this from within python? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Java webservice does not return all struct array

    - by Aykut
    Hi I wrote a webservice which runs correctly. In the webservice, there is a class which contains other classes' arrays and the webservice returns this class's instance. for example public class cls1 implements Serializable{ cls2[] cls2Arr; cls3[] cls3Arr; } I fill this arrays (cls2Arr and cls3Arr) correctly in service side. When I read this arrays from client, I see only last item of arrays. I checked on the service side before the webservice returns, and the cls1 instance and everything else looked good. What can be a reason ? Thx

    Read the article

  • BizTalk external assembly namespace and static methods

    - by SteveC
    Is there some restriction in BizTalk 2006 R2 to accessing static methods in external assemblies when the assembly has a "." in the name ? I have the solution set-up with the BizTalk project "FooBar", and the external assembly project "FooBar.Helper" (strongly signed and GAC'ed) with a class "Demo" (public and serializable), which is referenced in the BizTalk project I can create a BizTalk variable of type "FooBar.Helper.Demo" and access an instance method fine, but an expression window the Intellisense shows the FooBar namespace, but if I dot it, I get the error "illegal dotted name" ??? However I can add another project, "ExtComp" with class "Test" and it's static methods are displayed in Intellisense !!! The only difference I can see is the first external assembly has the dot in it

    Read the article

  • Can I serialize a BitArray to XML?

    - by SimonNet
    Hello I have a business class which I need to serialize to xml. It has a BitArray property. I have decorated it with [XmlAttribute] but the serialization is failing with To be XML serializable, types which inherit from ICollection must have an implementation of Add(System.Boolean) at all levels of their inheritance hierarchy. System.Collections.BitArray does not implement Add(System.Boolean). I am not sure whether its possible to serialize to xml? If not what would be an efficient means of serializing the BitArray Thanks for looking

    Read the article

  • Dirty Reads in Postgres

    - by User1
    I have a long running function that should be inserting new rows. How do I check the progress of this function? I was thinking dirty reads would work so I read http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/sql-set-transaction.html and came up with the following code and ran it in a new session: SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS SERIALIZABLE; SELECT * FROM MyTable; Postgres gives me a syntax error. What am I doing wrong? If I do it right, will I see the inserted records while that long function is still running? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Where to find a unique session ID at design time in .Net WinForms.

    - by Jules
    I've created a custom clipboard because it's not possible to make my whole class map serializable - which is a requirement for the windows clipboard. However, I need to distinguish between users who are using my clipboard through a unique id. Basically, I want to be able identify a person who is sat at one PC with one or more copies of visual studio (or similar) open. How do I do that? ps: This is at design-time. pps: It's not critical that it should work between copies of visual studio. One copy would be fine, or even one design surface.

    Read the article

  • Overriding setter on domain class in grails 1.1.2

    - by Pavel P
    I have following two domain classes in Grails 1.1.2: class A implements Serializable { MyEnumType myField Date fieldChanged void setMyField(MyEnumType val) { if (myField != null && myField != val) { myField = val fieldChanged = new Date() } } } class B extends A { List children void setMyField(MyEnumType val) { if (myField != null && myField != val) { myField = val fieldChanged = new Date() children.each { child -> child.myField = val } } } When I set B instance's myField, I get the setter into the cycle... myField = val line calls setter again instead of assiging the new value. Any hint how to override the setter correctly? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Writing secure java code with RMI

    - by jtnire
    Hi Everyone, This may seem like a very broad question, but any help is appreciated. I have a client/server solution written in java which uses the Cajo project (which uses RMI). I just want to try and make my solution as secure as possible, given the sensitive data that will be transferred between server and client. So far, my ideas are to make all my classes "final" as well as throw a "non-serializable" exception for all my classes in the server (except for the object bound in the RMI registry, and any objects that actually do need to be transferred of course). Can anyone think of any other ideas? I know that someone could write a malicious client - this isn't hard to do as you can find out the remote object's API using reflection. However is there anything I can do to protect a malicious client access classes/objects within the server that they are not supposed to access? Many Thanks

    Read the article

  • how to force ejb3 to reload value from data base and not use those of the context

    - by Kohan95
    Hello here I have a big problem that I hope to find help here I have two entities @Entity @Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.JOINED) @DiscriminatorColumn(name="Role", discriminatorType=DiscriminatorType.STRING) public class Utilisateur implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY) @Column(name="id") private Long id; @Column(name="nom",nullable=false) private String nom; @Column(name="Role",nullable=false, insertable=false) private String Role ; //... } @Entity @Table(name="ResCom") @DiscriminatorValue("ResCom") public class ResCom extends Utilisateur { /... } the first thing I do ResCom rsCom= new ResCom(nom,prenom, email,civilite, SysQl.crypePasse(pass)); gr.create(rsCom); I check my database I see that property is ResCom insert but when I check the value of role I get null Utilisateur tets= gr.findByEmail(email); message=tets.getEmail()+" and Role :"+tets.getRole()+""; but in my bass it ResCom !!!!! the problem disappears when I deploy the project again I hope you have a solution And thank you in advance sorry for my English

    Read the article

  • Spring data mapping problem.

    - by Yashwant Chavan
    Hi, I am using spring and hibernate along with my different components There is date field in DB as contract_end_date as a Date , so my pojo also contains date getter setter for contract_end_date, but when i submit form to Multiaction controller it gives data bindding exception for contract_end_date. It trying to search string getter setter for contract_end_date. So is there is any solution to handle this kind of problem. This is my pojo. after sumitting the form getting data binding exception public class Clnt implements java.io.Serializable { private String clntId; private String clntNm; private String busUnitNm; private String statCd; private String cmntTx; private Date contractEndDt; }

    Read the article

  • Custom ArrayList serialization

    - by rayman
    Hi, i was trying to serialize an ArrayList which contacins custom objects. I`am serializing it in a servlet(server side), and deserialize at the client side. (using ObjectOutputStream,ObjectInputStream) it worked fine, when I work with ArrayList< String but when i tried it with ArrayList< MyObject i couldnt get any results in the client side, this is the exception: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: web.MyObject *ofcourse that i have done this: MyObject implements Serializable ... MyObject contains only String fields in it. what have I done worng? Thanks, ray.

    Read the article

  • Unit testing with serialization mock objects in C++

    - by lhumongous
    Greetings, I'm fairly new to TDD and ran across a unit test that I'm not entirely sure how to address. Basically, I'm testing a couple of legacy class methods which read/write a binary stream to a file. The class functions take a serializable object as a parameter, which handles the actual reading/writing to the file. For testing this, I was thinking that I would need a serialization mock object that I would pass to this function. My initial thought was to have the mock object hold onto a (char*) which would dynamically allocate memory and memcpy the data. However, it seems like the mock object might be doing too much work, and might be beyond the scope of this particular test. Is my initial approach correct, or can anyone think of another way of correctly testing this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • List<string> doesn't update the UI when change occurs [WPF]

    - by Hard Turner
    <ListBox x:Name="MainList" HorizontalAlignment="Left" Height="468" Margin="10,10,0,0" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="100" ItemsSource="{Binding Items,Mode=TwoWay}" DisplayMemberPath="Name"/> [Serializable()] public class MYcontainer : INotifyPropertyChanged,ISerializable { private List<MYClass> _items = new List<MYClass>(); public List<MYClass> Items { get{ return _items;} set { this._items =value; OnPropertyChanged("Items"); } public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; public void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName = null) { var eventHandler = this.PropertyChanged; if (eventHandler != null) eventHandler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName)); } } when i add an item to "Items" the UI doesnt update, the binding is working fine, since if i closed the window and opened it again, the new items appear correctly what am i doing wrong? i know if i used observablecollection it will work fine, but shouldn't it work with List<? , i already have in another window a string[] property and it update fine

    Read the article

  • What structure of data use to communicate via tcp/ip in java?

    - by rmaster
    Let's assume I want to send many messages between 2 programs made in java that use TCP sockets. I think the most convienient way is to send objects like: PrintStream ps = new PrintStream(s.getOutputStream()); ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(ps); some_kind_of_object_here; oos.writeObject(some_kind_of_object_here); ps.print(oos); I want to send, strings, numbers, HashMaps, boolean values How can I do this using fx 1 object that can store all that properties? I though about ArrayList that is serializable and we can put there everything but is not elegant way. I want to send different types of data because user can choose from a variety of options that server can do for it. Any advices?

    Read the article

  • Grails Unique Constraint for Groups

    - by WaZ
    Hi there, I have the following requirement I have 3 domains namely: class Product { String productName static constraints = { productName(unique:true,blank:false) } class SubType { String subTypeName static constraints = { subTypeName(unique:true,blank:false) } String toString() { "${subTypeName}" } } class CLType { String TypeName static belongsTo = Car static hasMany = [car:Cars] static constraints = { } String toString() { "${TypeName}" } class CLines implements Serializable { Dealer dealer CLType clType SubType subType Product product static constraints = { dealer(nullable:false,blank:false,unique:['subType','product','clType']) clType(blank:false,nullable:false) subType(nullable:true) product(nullable:true) } } I want to achieve this combination: A user can assign dealer a CLType. But cannot have duplicates. As an example consider this scenario Please let me know what to mention in my unqiue constraint to make this possible? Thanks, Much Appreciated.

    Read the article

  • AppFabric serialization problem.

    - by jandark
    I am trying cache a class instance with AppFabric but it return class instance with empty members. The reason is DataContract Attribute. My class is marked with [Serializable] and [DataContract(Name = "TestClass", Namespace = "CustomNameSpace.TestClass")] attributes. Problem solving if I mark all properties with DataMember or remove DataContract attribute. But I do not want to remove DataContract attributte because of other serialization needs (such as json or something else) Or I do not want to add DataMember attribute to other classes. (a lot of) Do you have any idea to solve that problem ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to expose a control collection to a property grid at design time

    - by Stefano Delendati
    I have a custom control that with a property that is a collection of custom object. This custom object hava a reference to some component/controls. When at design time I tray to add an item to the collection and select the object, VS tells me that the control is not serializable. This is the code (simplified version - but not to much): public class ViewRefObj { public control view { get; set; } public ViewRefObj() { } } private List<ViewRefObj> _controls=new List<ViewRefObj>(); public List<ViewRefObj> Views { get { return _controls; } }

    Read the article

  • How do I get the WinForm Designer to totally ignore a property on a custom control?

    - by Ian Ringrose
    This must be a FAQ, but I can’t find a duplicate question! There are lot of different attributes that control what the WinForm Designer does with properties on a custom control, I am never clear on the one I should use in this case. I am looking for: Designer does not show property in grid Designer does not read value of property Designer does not set property to default value E.g. Designer behaves as if the property was not there. Designer does not complain if it has already done one of the above before the attributes were added (hard!) Background. The code that is giving me the problem is: this.eventListControl.FilterSets = ((SystList<FilterSet>)(resources.GetObject("eventListControl.FilterSets"))); The FilterSets property should never have been touched by the winforms designer; it is now not Serializable and MsDev falls over every time a form that used the eventListControl is changed!

    Read the article

  • How should i be handling string Interning on deserialization?

    - by DayOne
    In the example below I am interning the string in the constructor which is fine. However when i deserialise the object from the binary formatter I don't think the string will be interned as the constructor should be called. How should I be ensuring the _name string is interned? ... or will it be interned ok? Thanks [Serializable] class City { private readonly string _name; public City(string t) { _name = string.Intern(t); } public string Name { get { return _name; } } public override string ToString() { return _name; } }

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to use a dictionary or xml in the Application Settings?

    - by Shimmy
    I have to store a complex type in the application settings. I thought that storing it as XML would work best. The problem is I don't know how store XML. I prefer to store it as a managed XML rather than using just a string of raw XML having to parse it on each access. I managed to set the Type column of the setting to XDocument, but I was unable to set its value. Is there a way to use XDocument or XML in application settings? Update I found a way, simply by editing the .settings file with the xml editor. I changed it to a custom serializable dictionary, but I get the following error when I try to access the setting-property (I set it to a serialized representation of the default value). The property 'Setting' could not be created from it's default value. Error message: There is an error in XML document (1, 41). Any ideas will be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • move data from one table to another, postgresql edition

    - by IggShaman
    Hi All, I'd like to move some data from one table to another (with a possibly different schema). Straightforward solution that comes into mind is - start a transaction with serializable isolation level; INSERT INTO dest_table SELECT data FROM orig_table,other-tables WHERE <condition>; DELETE FROM orig_table USING other-tables WHERE <condition>; COMMIT; Now what if the amount of data is rather big, and the <condition> is expensive to compute? In PostgreSQL, a RULE or a stored procedure can be used to delete data on the fly, evaluating condition only once. Which solution is better? Are there other options?

    Read the article

  • what is serialization and how it works

    - by Rozer
    I know the serialization process but have't implemented it. In my application i have seen there are various classes that has been implemented serilizable interface. consider following class public class DBAccessRequest implements Serializable { private ActiveRequest request = null; private Connection connection = null; private static Log log = LogFactory.getLog(DBAccessRequest.class); public DBAccessRequest(ActiveRequest request,Connection connection) { this.request = request; this.connection = connection; } /** * @return Returns the DB Connection object. */ public Connection getConnection() { return connection; } /** * @return Returns the active request object for the db connection. */ public ActiveRequest getRequest() { return request; } } just setting request and connection in constructor and having getter setter for them. so what is the use of serilizable implementation over here...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >