Search Results

Search found 22272 results on 891 pages for 'post commit'.

Page 157/891 | < Previous Page | 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164  | Next Page >

• Where are stickies ( Sticky Notes) stored on mac 10.9.3?

  - by user332203

  i deleted an important note on stickies. And i retrieved an old version of it in time machine under preferences / widgets. but the setup appears to have changed in my upgrade to mavericks and I can't open the note. I'm trying to open a "post-mavericks" version in my time machine and I can't find where it is. i saw a post that said look under Library/Preferences/Container, i have no such folder or binary document. Please help.

  Read the article

• Interesting links week #24 and #25

  - by erwin21

  Below a list of interesting links that I found this week: Interaction: Design Usability and All About It Frontend: CSS Lint – CSS Cleaning Tool 10 HTML Entity Crimes You Really Shouldn’t Commit Development: OWASP Top 10 for .NET developers part 7: Insecure Cryptographic Storage C#/.NET Fundamentals: Choosing the Right Collection Class Mobile: Tips to Design a Website for Mobile Marketing: 30 (New) Google Ranking Factors You May Over- or Underestimate Other: 5 Little-Known Web Files That Can Enhance Your Website Interested in more interesting links follow me at twitter http://twitter.com/erwingriekspoor

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC 1: Model Binding With Disabled Textbox

  - by modernzombie

  I have a textbox that I am defining as <%= Html.TextBox("Username", Model.Form.Username, new { @class = "textbox", @disabled = "disabled" })%> In my action [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] [ValidateAntiForgeryToken] public ActionResult EditLogin(LoginForm post) { ... return View(model); } post.Username will be blank, all other properties bind correctly, but if I change @disabled="disabled to @readonly="readonly" the username binds properly and everything works. It looks like model binding ignores values in disabled fields. Is their a way around this? I still need the field's value to bind to the model. I can use readonly but would prefer to use disabled so it is visually apparent to the user that they cannot edit the value of the field.

  Read the article

• SQL SERVER – Stored Procedure and Transactions

  - by pinaldave

  I just overheard the following statement – “I do not use Transactions in SQL as I use Stored Procedure“. I just realized that there are so many misconceptions about this subject. Transactions has nothing to do with Stored Procedures. Let me demonstrate that with a simple example. USE tempdb GO -- Create 3 Test Tables CREATE TABLE TABLE1 (ID INT); CREATE TABLE TABLE2 (ID INT); CREATE TABLE TABLE3 (ID INT); GO -- Create SP CREATE PROCEDURE TestSP AS INSERT INTO TABLE1 (ID) VALUES (1) INSERT INTO TABLE2 (ID) VALUES ('a') INSERT INTO TABLE3 (ID) VALUES (3) GO -- Execute SP -- SP will error out EXEC TestSP GO -- Check the Values in Table SELECT * FROM TABLE1; SELECT * FROM TABLE2; SELECT * FROM TABLE3; GO Now, the main point is: If Stored Procedure is transactional then, it should roll back complete transactions when it encounters any errors. Well, that does not happen in this case, which proves that Stored Procedure does not only provide just the transactional feature to a batch of T-SQL. Let’s see the result very quickly. It is very clear that there were entries in table1 which are not shown in the subsequent tables. If SP was transactional in terms of T-SQL Query Batches, there would be no entries in any of the tables. If you want to use Transactions with Stored Procedure, wrap the code around with BEGIN TRAN and COMMIT TRAN. The example is as following. CREATE PROCEDURE TestSPTran AS BEGIN TRAN INSERT INTO TABLE1 (ID) VALUES (11) INSERT INTO TABLE2 (ID) VALUES ('b') INSERT INTO TABLE3 (ID) VALUES (33) COMMIT GO -- Execute SP EXEC TestSPTran GO -- Check the Values in Tables SELECT * FROM TABLE1; SELECT * FROM TABLE2; SELECT * FROM TABLE3; GO -- Clean up DROP TABLE Table1 DROP TABLE Table2 DROP TABLE Table3 GO In this case, there will be no entries in any part of the table. What is your opinion about this blog post? Please leave your comments about it here. Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.SQLAuthority.com) Filed under: Pinal Dave, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Query, SQL Scripts, SQL Server, SQL Stored Procedure, SQL Tips and Tricks, T SQL, Technology

  Read the article

• String length difference between ruby 1.8 and 1.9

  - by Raghu

  I have a website thats running on ruby 1.8.7 . I have a validation on an incoming post that checks to make sure that we allow upto max of 12000 characters. The spaces are counted as characters and tab and carriage returns are stripped off before the post is subjected to the validation. Here is the post that is subjected to validation http://pastie.org/5047582 In ruby 1.9 the string length shows up as 11909 which is correct. But when I check the length on ruby 1.8.7 is turns out to be 12044. I used codepad.org to run this ruby code which gives me http://codepad.org/OxgSuKGZ ( which outputs the length as 12044 which is wrong) but when i run this same code in the console at codeacademy.org the string length is 11909. Can anybody explain me why this is happening ??? Thanks

  Read the article

• [Silverlight, Navigation] Layout of elements added to a tabcontrol on a different navigation page wr

  - by sinni800

  Hello, I am developing a Silverlight client using the provided navigation template for an imageboard I developed. I have a "search" tab which lists all searches for tags which were executed. I also have a show post tab which shows (also in tab-form) posts, opened from the search tab. When I open a post from the search page, it instanciates a new control (of type UserControl) and inserts this into the ShowPost page's tabcontrol. When I switch (or get switched) to the Show Post view the layout is all messed up. The UserControl inside the tab does not stretch in the tab. When I switch tabs back and forth this is strangely fixed. The reason seems to be that the user control gets created there but has no layout to "fit to" until said layout is opened, which is too late then. You can see it here: http://aspbooru.tk/Silverlight/UI.aspx Thank you in advance...

  Read the article

• In apache cxf, How do i know the soap request message is gzip compressed?

  - by aspirant75

  I'm using Apache CXF to send soap message. in specific case, i have to send a soap message gzip compressed. Using log4j, i printed detailed info. would you let me know how i can know the message is gzip compressed and transfered to server. thanks in advance. Below is my java code for gzip and log info. java code Client cxfClient = ClientProxy.getClient(port); /** Logging Interceptor */ cxfClient.getInInterceptors().add(new GZIPInInterceptor()); cxfClient.getOutInterceptors().add(new GZIPOutInterceptor()); log info 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by bus: [] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by client: [org.apache.cxf.transport.http.gzip.GZIPOutInterceptor@1682a53] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by endpoint: [org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor@1b2d7df, org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.SwAOutInterceptor@7a9224, org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.WrapperClassOutInterceptor@110b640, org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.HolderOutInterceptor@2d59a3] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by binding: [org.apache.cxf.interceptor.AttachmentOutInterceptor@158015a, org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor@c0c8b5, org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor@b914b3, org.apache.cxf.interceptor.BareOutInterceptor@fdfc58, org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor@c22a3b, org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor@1629e71] 20120814 18:56:15,351 DEBUG Interceptors contributed by databinding: [] 20120814 18:56:15,357 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.transport.http.gzip.GZIPOutInterceptor@1682a53 to phase prepare-send 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor@1b2d7df to phase prepare-send 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.SwAOutInterceptor@7a9224 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.WrapperClassOutInterceptor@110b640 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.HolderOutInterceptor@2d59a3 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.AttachmentOutInterceptor@158015a to phase pre-stream 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor@c0c8b5 to phase pre-stream 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor@b914b3 to phase pre-logical 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.BareOutInterceptor@fdfc58 to phase marshal 20120814 18:56:15,358 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor@c22a3b to phase post-logical 20120814 18:56:15,359 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor@1629e71 to phase write 20120814 18:56:15,360 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was created. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.HolderOutInterceptor@2d59a3 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG op: [OperationInfo: {https://asp.cyberbooking.co.kr/TopasApiSvc/services}getAirAvail] 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG op.hasOutput(): true 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG op.getOutput().size(): 2 20120814 18:56:15,361 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.SwAOutInterceptor@7a9224 20120814 18:56:15,364 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.jaxws.interceptors.WrapperClassOutInterceptor@110b640 20120814 18:56:15,364 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor@b914b3 20120814 18:56:15,365 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor@c22a3b 20120814 18:56:15,365 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor@1b2d7df 20120814 18:56:15,365 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor@dc9065 to phase prepare-send-ending 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was modified. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] prepare-send-ending [MessageSenderEndingInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.transport.http.gzip.GZIPOutInterceptor@1682a53 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG Requestor role, so gzip enabled 20120814 18:56:15,366 DEBUG gzip permitted: YES 20120814 18:56:15,367 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.AttachmentOutInterceptor@158015a 20120814 18:56:15,367 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor@c0c8b5 20120814 18:56:15,370 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor$StaxOutEndingInterceptor@1f488f1 to phase pre-stream-ending 20120814 18:56:15,370 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was modified. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] pre-stream-ending [StaxOutEndingInterceptor] prepare-send-ending [MessageSenderEndingInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,370 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor@1629e71 20120814 18:56:15,383 DEBUG Adding interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor$SoapOutEndingInterceptor@1ce663c to phase write-ending 20120814 18:56:15,384 DEBUG Chain org.apache.cxf.phase.PhaseInterceptorChain@31688f was modified. Current flow: pre-logical [HolderOutInterceptor, SwAOutInterceptor, WrapperClassOutInterceptor, SoapHeaderOutFilterInterceptor] post-logical [SoapPreProtocolOutInterceptor] prepare-send [MessageSenderInterceptor, GZIPOutInterceptor] pre-stream [AttachmentOutInterceptor, StaxOutInterceptor] write [SoapOutInterceptor] marshal [BareOutInterceptor] write-ending [SoapOutEndingInterceptor] pre-stream-ending [StaxOutEndingInterceptor] prepare-send-ending [MessageSenderEndingInterceptor] 20120814 18:56:15,384 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.BareOutInterceptor@fdfc58 20120814 18:56:15,387 DEBUG Compressing message. 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Sending POST Message with Headers to http://test.co.kr:80/###/###/###Conduit :{https://test.co.kr/###/####}###.http-conduit Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG SOAPAction: "getAirAvail" 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Accept: */* 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Accept-Encoding: gzip;q=1.0, identity; q=0.5, *;q=0 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG Content-Encoding: gzip 20120814 18:56:15,388 DEBUG No Trust Decider for Conduit '{https://test.co.kr/###/###}###.http-conduit'. An afirmative Trust Decision is assumed. 20120814 18:56:15,394 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.binding.soap.interceptor.SoapOutInterceptor$SoapOutEndingInterceptor@1ce663c 20120814 18:56:15,394 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.StaxOutInterceptor$StaxOutEndingInterceptor@1f488f1 20120814 18:56:15,394 DEBUG Invoking handleMessage on interceptor org.apache.cxf.interceptor.MessageSenderInterceptor$MessageSenderEndingInterceptor@dc9065 20120814 18:56:15,459 DEBUG Response Code: 200 Conduit: {https://test.co.kr/###/###}###.http-conduit 20120814 18:56:15,459 DEBUG Content length: 11034 20120814 18:56:15,459 DEBUG Header fields: null: [HTTP/1.1 200 OK] Content-Language: [ko-KR] Date: [Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:56:15 GMT] Content-Length: [11034] P3P: [CP='CAO PSA CONi OTR OUR DEM ONL'] Expires: [Thu, 01 Dec 1994 16:00:00 GMT] Keep-Alive: [timeout=10, max=100] Set-Cookie: [WMONID=mL6rq_Irpa_; Expires=Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:56:15 GMT; Path=/] Connection: [Keep-Alive] Content-Type: [text/xml; charset=utf-8] Server: [IBM_HTTP_Server] Cache-Control: [no-cache="set-cookie, set-cookie2"]

  Read the article

• What's a good scheme for multi-user database synchronization?

  - by Mason Wheeler

  I'm working on a system to allow multiple users to collaborate on an online project. Everything is fairly straightforward, except for keeping the users in sync. Each user has their own local copy of the project database, which allows them to make changes and test things out, and then send the updates to the central server. But this runs into the classic synchronization question: how do you keep two users from editing the same thing and stomping each other's work? I've got an idea that should work, but I wonder if there's a simpler way to do it. Here's the basic concept: All project data is stored in a relational database. Each row in the database has an owner. If the current user is not the owner, he can read but not write that row. (This is enforced client-side.) The user can send a request to the server to take ownership of a row, which will be granted if the server's copy says that the current owner is NULL, or to release ownership when they're done with it. It is not possible to release ownership without committing changes to the server. It is not possible to commit changes to the server without having first downloaded all outstanding changes to the server. When any changes are made to rows you own, a trigger marks that row as Dirty. When you commit changes, the database is scanned for all Dirty rows in all tables, and the data is serialized into an update file, which is posted to the server, and all rows are marked Clean. The server applies the updates on its end, and keeps the file around. When other users download changes, the server sends them the update files that they haven't already received. So, essentially this is a reinvention of version control on a relational database. (Sort of.) As long as taking ownership and applying updates to the server are guaranteed atomic changes, and the server verifies that some smart-aleck user didn't edit their local database so they could send an update for a row they don't have ownership of, it should be guaranteed to be correct, and with no need to worry about merges and merge conflicts. (I think.) Can anyone think of any problems with this scheme, or ways to do it better? (And no, "build [insert VCS here] into your project" is not what I'm looking for. I've thought of that already. VCSs work well with text, and not so well with other file formats, such as relational databases.)

  Read the article

• flush output in Bourne Shell

  - by n-alexander

  I use echo in Upstart scripts to log things: script echo "main: some data" >> log end script post-start script echo "post-start: another data" >> log end script Now these two run in parallel, so in the logs I often see: main: post-start: some data another data This is not critical, so I won't employ proper synching, but thought I'd turn auto flush ON to at least reduce this effect. Is there an easy way to do that? Update: yes, flushing will not properly fix it, but I've seen it help such situations to some degree, and this is all I need in this case. It's just that I don't know how to do it in Shell

  Read the article

• php-curl script that saves images---actually captcha images

  - by user253530

  I have a curl class, called Curl. Let's presume i have this code: $url = 'http://www.google.com' $fields = array('q'=>'search term'); //maybe some other arguments. but let's keep it simple. $curl = new Curl(); $page = $curl->post($url,$fields); $page will have some images wich curl doesn't load them by default. I need to know how i can save a specific image without using curl. Once I use $page = $curl-post(..) I need to know how I can have that image saved without using another $curl-post(_image_location_) to get that file. The reason why need this is to save a captcha image from a form. I need to access the form and get that specific image that's being loaded. If i try to access the URL of the image, it will be a different captcha image.

  Read the article

• How to implement full text search in Django?

  - by Jannis

  I would like to implement a search function in a django blogging application. The status quo is that I have a list of strings supplied by the user and the queryset is narrowed down by each string to include only those objects that match the string. See: if request.method == "POST": form = SearchForm(request.POST) if form.is_valid(): posts = Post.objects.all() for string in form.cleaned_data['query'].split(): posts = posts.filter( Q(title__icontains=string) | Q(text__icontains=string) | Q(tags__name__exact=string) ) return archive_index(request, queryset=posts, date_field='date') Now, what if I didn't want do concatenate each word that is searched for by a logical AND but with a logical OR? How would I do that? Is there a way to do that with Django's own Queryset methods or does one have to fall back to raw SQL queries? In general, is it a proper solution to do full text search like this or would you recommend using a search engine like Solr, Whoosh or Xapian. What are there benefits? Thanks for taking the time

  Read the article

• no entry for / in /etc/fstab

  - by valya

  Hello! I can't find an entry for mounting "/" in /etc/fstab (I was hoping to set commit value to something big because my HDD is pretty slow): [.../fest]$ cat /etc/fstab # UNCONFIGURED FSTAB FOR BASE SYSTEM /dev/sda3 /media/megahard ntfs-3g defaults,locale=en_US.UTF-8 0 0 /mnt/2Gb.swap none swap sw 0 0 [.../fest]$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 10.10 \n \l Netbook Remix, installed with chroot from Wubi (it's not Wubi, it's just installed from it)

  Read the article

• Rails User-Profile model challenges

  - by Craig

  I am attempting to create an enrollment process similar to SO's: route to an OpenID provider provider returns the user's information to the UsersController (a guess) UsersController creates user, then routes to the ProfilesController's new or edit action. For now, I'm simply trying to create the user, then route to the ProfilesController's new or edit action (not sure which I should be using). Here's what I have thus far: Models: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :profile end class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user end Routes: map.resources :users do |user| user.resource :profile end new_user_profile GET /users/:user_id/profile/new(.:format) {:controller=>"profiles", :action=>"new"} edit_user_profile GET /users/:user_id/profile/edit(.:format) {:controller=>"profiles", :action=>"edit"} user_profile GET /users/:user_id/profile(.:format) {:controller=>"profiles", :action=>"show"} PUT /users/:user_id/profile(.:format) {:controller=>"profiles", :action=>"update"} DELETE /users/:user_id/profile(.:format) {:controller=>"profiles", :action=>"destroy"} POST /users/:user_id/profile(.:format) {:controller=>"profiles", :action=>"create"} users GET /users(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"index"} POST /users(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"create"} new_user GET /users/new(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"new"} edit_user GET /users/:id/edit(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"edit"} user GET /users/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"show"} PUT /users/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"update"} DELETE /users/:id(.:format) {:controller=>"users", :action=>"destroy"} Controllers: class UsersController < ApplicationController # generate new-user form def new @user = User.new end # process new-user-form post def create @user = User.new(params[:user]) if @user.save redirect_to new_user_profile_path(@user) ... end end # generate edit-user form def edit @user = User.find(params[:id]) end # process edit-user-form post def update @user = User.find(params[:id]) respond_to do |format| if @user.update_attributes(params[:user]) flash[:notice] = 'User was successfully updated.' format.html { redirect_to(users_path) } format.xml { head :ok } ... end end end class ProfilesController < ApplicationController before_filter :get_user def get_user @user = User.find(params[:user_id]) end # generate new-profile form def new @user.profile = Profile.new @profile = @user.profile end # process new-profile-form post def create @user.profile = Profile.new(params[:profile]) @profile = @user.profile respond_to do |format| if @profile.save flash[:notice] = 'Profile was successfully created.' format.html { redirect_to(@profile) } format.xml { render :xml => @profile, :status => :created, :location => @profile } ... end end end # generate edit-profile form def edit @profile = @user.profile end # generate edit-profile-form post def update @profile = @user.profile respond_to do |format| if @profile.update_attributes(params[:profile]) flash[:notice] = 'Profile was successfully updated.' # format.html { redirect_to(@profile) } format.html { redirect_to(user_profile(@user)) } format.xml { head :ok } else format.html { render :action => "edit" } format.xml { render :xml => @profile.errors, :status => :unprocessable_entity } end end end Edit-User View: ... <% form_for(@user) do |f| %> ... New-Profile View: ... <% form_for([@user,@profile]) do |f| %> .. I'm having two problems: When saving an edit to the User model, the UsersController attempts to route to http://localhost:3000/users/1/profile.%23%3Cprofile:0x10438e3e8%3E, instead of http://localhost:3000/users/1/profile When the new-profile form is being rendered, it throws an error that reads: undefined method `user_profiles_path' for # Is it better to create a blank profile when the user is created (in the UsersController), then edit it OR follow the rest-ful convention of creating the profile in the ProfilesController (as I have done)? What am I missing? I did review Associating Two Models in Rails (user and profile), but it didn't address my needs. Thanks for your time.

  Read the article

• How to JOIN a COUNT from a table, and then effect that COUNT with another JOIN

  - by jakenoble

  Hi I have three tables Post ID Name 1 'Something' 2 'Something else' 3 'One more' Comment ID PostId ProfileID Comment 1 1 1 'Hi my name is' 2 2 2 'I like cakes' 3 3 3 'I hate cakes' Profile ID Approved 1 1 2 0 3 1 I want to count the comments for a post where the profile for the comment is approved I can select the data from Post and then join a count from Comment fine. But this count should be dependent on if the Profile is approved or not. The results I am expecting is CommentCount PostId Count 1 1 2 0 3 1 Thanks for any help.

  Read the article

• Proper way of deleting records with Codeigniter

  - by luckytaxi

  I came across another Stackoverflow post regarding Get vs Post and it made me think. With CI, my URL for deleting a record is http://domain.com/item/delete/100, which deletes record id 100 from my DB. The record_id is pulled via $this->uri->segment. In my model I do have a where clause that checks that the user is indeed the owner of that record. A user_id is stored in a session inside the DB. Is that good enough? My understanding is, POST should be used for one time modification for data and GET is for retrieving regards (e.g. viewing an item or permalink).

  Read the article

• Setting permissions to Add Comments of Jom Comment in Joomla1.5

  - by Aruna

  Hi, I am having Jom Comment installed in my Joomla1.5. i have created a section namely userblog - Section blog layout type. By default , under every blog post under tat section i am having a Add COmment(0) link which allows to add comment to the blog post. How to set permisssions for allowing only some group members to add the comments?? How to get the View comment link under each blog post.. Instead of getting Add Comment(2).??? Please help me .... Thanks in Advance.

  Read the article

• Ajax.ActionLink is not POSTing

  - by Dave Hanna

  I am trying to navigate to an MVC action by POSTing rather than GETting. (The action is a DELETE, and I don't want it reachable by an external link.) I am using a link in a grid generated by Ajax.ActionLink("Remove", "Delete", new { saID = Model.Said, id = e.id }, new AjaxOptions { HttpMethod = "POST", Confirm = "Are you sure you want to delete this item?" }) Which generates the following HTML: <a href="/Equipment/Delete/102424/229933" onclick="Sys.Mvc.AsyncHyperlink.handleClick(this, new Sys.UI.DomEvent(event), { insertionMode: Sys.Mvc.InsertionMode.replace, confirm: 'Are you sure you want to delete this item?', httpMethod: 'POST' });">Remove</a> My problem is that when I click on the link, I am reaching the Delete action via a GET rather than a POST, AND the Confirm dialog is not taking place. I have been googling this for several hours and just keep getting wrapped around the axle. What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• Use python decorators on class methods and subclass methods

  - by AlexH

  Goal: Make it possible to decorate class methods. When a class method gets decorated, it gets stored in a dictionary so that other class methods can reference it by a string name. Motivation: I want to implement the equivalent of ASP.Net's WebMethods. I am building this on top of google app engine, but that does not affect the point of difficulty that I am having. How it Would look if it worked: class UsefulClass(WebmethodBaseClass): def someMethod(self, blah): print(blah) @webmethod def webby(self, blah): print(blah) # the implementation of this class could be completely different, it does not matter # the only important thing is having access to the web methods defined in sub classes class WebmethodBaseClass(): def post(self, methodName): webmethods[methodName]("kapow") ... a = UsefulClass() a.post("someMethod") # should error a.post("webby") # prints "kapow" There could be other ways to go about this. I am very open to suggestions

  Read the article

• will_paginate undefined method error - Ruby on Rails

  - by bgadoci

  I just installed the gem for will_paginate and it says that it was installed successfully. I followed all the instructions listed with the plugin and I am getting an 'undefined method `paginate' for' error. Can't find much in the way of Google search and haven't been able to fix it myself (obviously). Here is the code: PostsController def index @tag_counts = Tag.count(:group => :tag_name, :order => 'updated_at DESC', :limit => 10) @posts = Post.paginate :page => params[:page], :per_page => 50 respond_to do |format| format.html # index.html.erb format.xml { render :xml => @posts } format.json { render :json => @posts } format.atom end end /model/post.rb class Post < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :body, :title has_many :comments, :dependent => :destroy has_many :tags, :dependent => :destroy cattr_reader :per_page @@per_page = 10 end /posts/views/index.html.erb <%= will_paginate @posts %>

  Read the article

• Development processes, the use of version control, and unit-testing

  - by ct01

  Preface I've worked at quite a few "flat" organizations in my time. Most of the version control policy/process has been "only commit after it's been tested". We were constantly committing at each place to "trunk" (cvs/svn). The same was true with unit-testing - it's always been a "we need to do this" mentality but it never really materializes in a substantive form b/c there is no institutional knowledge base to do it - no mentorship. Version Control The emphasis for version control management at one place was a very strict protocol for commit messages (format & content). The other places let employees just do "whatever". The branching, tagging, committing, rolling back, and merging aspect of things was always ill defined and almost never used. This sort of seems to leave the version control system in the position of being a fancy file-storage mechanism with a meta-data component that never really gets accessed/utilized. (The same was true for unit testing and committing code to the source tree) Unit tests It seems there's a prevailing "we must/should do this" mentality in most places I've worked. As a policy or standard operating procedure it never gets implemented because there seems to be a very ill-defined understanding about what that means, what is going to be tested, and how to do it. Summary It seems most places I've been to think version control and unit testing is "important" b/c the trendy trade journals say it is but, if there's very little mentorship to use these tools or any real business policies, then the full power of version control/unit testing is never really expressed. So grunts, like myself, never really have a complete understanding of the point beyond that "it's a good thing" and "we should do it". Question I was wondering if there are blogs, books, white-papers, or online journals about what one could call the business process or "standard operating procedures" or uses cases for version control and unit testing? I want to know more than the trade journals tell me and get serious about doing these things. PS: @Henrik Hansen had a great comment about the lack of definition for the question. I'm not interested in a specific unit-testing/versioning product or methodology (like, XP) - my interest is more about work-flow at the individual team/developer level than evangelism. This is more-or-less a by product of the management situation I've operated under more than a lack of reading software engineering books or magazines about development processes. A lot of what I've seen/read is more marketing oriented material than any specifically enumerated description of "well, this is how our shop operates".

  Read the article

• Changing data in a django modelform

  - by Matt Hampel

  I get data in from POST and validate it via this standard snippet: entry_formset = EntryFormSet(request.POST, request.FILES, prefix='entries') if entry_formset.is_valid(): .... The EntryFormSet modelform overrides a foreign key field widget to present a text field. That way, the user can enter an existing key (suggested via an Ajax live search), or enter a new key, which will be seamlessly added. I use this try-except block to test if the object exists already, and if it doesn't, I add it. entity_name = request.POST['entries-0-entity'] try: entity = Entity.objects.get(name=entity_name) except Entity.DoesNotExist: entity = Entity(name=entity_name) entity.slug = slugify(entity.name) entity.save() However, I now need to get that entity back into the entry_formset. It thinks that entries-0-entity is a string (that's how it came in); how can I directly access that value of the entry_formset and get it to take the object reference instead?

  Read the article

• How do I Integrate Production Database Hot Fixes into Shared Database Development model?

  - by TetonSig

  We are using SQL Source Control 3, SQL Compare, SQL Data Compare from RedGate, Mercurial repositories, TeamCity and a set of 4 environments including production. I am working on getting us to a dedicated environment per developer, but for at least the next 6 months we are stuck with a shared model. To summarize our current system, we have a DEV SQL server where developers first make changes/additions. They commit their changes through SQL Source Control to a local hgdev repository. When they execute an hg push to the main repository, TeamCity listens for that and then (among other things) pushes hgdev repository to hgrc. Another TeamCity process listens for that and does a pull from hgrc and deploys the latest to a QA SQL Server where regression and integration tests are run. When those are passed a push from hgrc to hgprod occurs. We do a compare of hgprod to our PREPROD SQL Server and generate deployment/rollback scripts for our production release. Separate from the above we have database Hot Fixes that will need to be applied in between releases. The process there is for our Operations team make changes on the PreProd database, and then after testing, to use SQL Source Control to commit their hot fix changes to hgprod from the PREPROD database, and then do a compare from hgprod to PRODUCTION, create deployment scripts and run them on PRODUCTION. If we were in a dedicated database per developer model, we could simply automatically push hgprod back to hgdev and merge in the hot fix change (through TeamCity monitoring for hgprod checkins) and then developers would pick it up and merge it to their local repository and database periodically. However, given that with a shared model the DEV database itself is the source of all changes, this won't work. Pushing hotfixes back to hgdev will show up in SQL Source Control as being different than DEV SQL Server and therefore we need to overwrite the reposistory with the "change" from the DEV SQL Server. My only workaround so far is to just have OPS assign a developer the hotfix ticket with a script attached and then we run their hotfixes against DEV ourselves to merge them back in. I'm not happy with that solution. Other than working faster to get to dedicated environment, are they other ways to keep this loop going automatically?

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC & Detached Entity won't save

  - by Justin

  Hey all, I have an ASP.NET MVC POST action for saving an entity on submit of a form. It works fine for insert but doesn't work for update, the database doesn't get called, so it's clearly not tracking the changes, as it's "detached". I'm using Entity Framework w/.NET 4: //POST: /Developers/Save/ [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Save(Developer developer) { developer.UpdateDate = DateTime.Now; if (developer.DeveloperID == 0) {//inserting new developer. DataContext.DeveloperData.Insert(developer); } //save changes - TODO: doesn't update... DataContext.SaveChanges(); //redirect to developer list. return RedirectToAction("Index"); } Any ideas would be greatly appreciated, thanks, Justin

  Read the article

• Only show content when certain criteria is met?

  - by Elliot

  I'm wondering if theres a best practice for what I'm trying to accomplish... First we have the model categories, categories, has_many posts. Now lets say, users add posts. Now, I have a page, that I want to display only the current user's posts by category. Lets say we have the following categories: A, B, and C User 1, has posted in Categories A and B. In my view I have something like: @categories.each do |category| category.name @posts.each do |post| if post.category_id==category.id post content here end end end The problem with this, is I'm going to show the empty category, as well as the categories that do have content. Is there a more efficient way of going about this? As I don't want to show the empty categories. Best, Elliot

  Read the article

• PHP Session when using desktop app

  - by Jonathan

  In this question I asked how to POST to a php file form a vb.net app: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2615335/post-to-webpage-in-vb-net-win-forms-desktop-not-asp-net So now I've logged in the user user by posting their username and password to the php file, the php file then does security/checks they exist/etc and if both username and password are correct is stores the user ID in a session variable. Now if the vb.net app tries to download data off a page which needs the user to logged in, it checks this by doing: if (!isset($_SESSION['uid'])) { header("Location: index.php"); } However after having logged correctly in the app the session variable is not set. How does session work with a vb.net app like this? When the user logs in successfully should I download the user id and keep it in the vb.net app and then post it to each page that requires authentication?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164  | Next Page >