Search Results

Search found 26956 results on 1079 pages for 'javascript arrays'.

Page 171/1079 | < Previous Page | 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178  | Next Page >

  • How to add <font> with Javascript?

    - by Fernando SBS
    FM_log(3,"rp_insertTable() called"); var farmTable = dom.cn("table"); var ftableBody = dom.cn("tbody"); var i; var maximize = GM_getValue("Maximize_" + suffixGlobal, 0); farmTable.className = "FMtbg"; farmTable.id = "farmMachineTable"; farmTable.setAttribute('cellpadding', 2); farmTable.setAttribute('cellspacing', 1); farmTable.style.marginBotton = "12px"; how can I add to that table, I mean, edit the HTML in the middle of that table and add "< font " ??? (ps: how can I add < code here without it being interpreted as code?)

    Read the article

  • Javascript callback function does not work in IE8!

    - by Abhishek
    I have a callback function in my open social application which fetches remote date. This works perfect on Crome and Mozila browers but not in IE8. Following is the example for the same, help will be appriciated: This funcation: gadgets.io.makeRequest(url, response, params) makes the callback call and following function process the responce: function response(obj) { var str = obj.text; var offerDtlPg = str.substr(0, str.length); document.getElementById('pplOfrDetls').innerHTML = offerDtlPg; };

    Read the article

  • Can anyone explain this snippet of Javascript?

    - by karthick6891
    Can anyone explain the following code? Forget the sine and cosine parts. Is it trying to build a space for the object? objectsInScene = new Array(); for (var i=space; i<180; i+=space) { for (var angle=0; angle<360; angle+=space) { var object = {}; var x = Math.sin(radian*i)*radius; object.x = Math.cos(angle*radian)*x; object.y = Math.cos(radian*i)*radius; object.z = Math.sin(angle*radian)*x; objectsInScene.push(object); } }

    Read the article

  • Javascript code semantics

    - by Mohammad
    if(myVar = img.parent('a').length > 0){ var Y = 1; }else{ var Y = 2; } When I run this code myVar (being announced for the first time) takes the value of img.parent('a').length > 0 and becomes either false or true depending on the case. First Question: Is this a correct way of defining myVar? Second Question: Am I defining Y for the second time? Is my second 'var' excess? i.e. should i just write Y = 2;

    Read the article

  • Doesn't JavaScript support closures with local variables?

    - by qollin
    I am very puzzled about this code: var closures = []; function create() { for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) { closures[i] = function() { alert("i = " + i); }; } } function run() { for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) { closures[i](); } } create(); run(); From my understanding it should print 0,1,2,3,4 (isn't this the concept of closures?). Instead it prints 5,5,5,5,5. I tried Rhino and Firefox. Could someone explain this behavior to me? Thx in advance.

    Read the article

  • Where can I find a proper JavaScript beautifier

    - by Ernelli
    I have used http://jsbeautifier.org/ successfully using Rhino and ant, but the problem is that it is not deterministic. If you run the beautifier twice on a file the result is different from each time, e.g. each pass inserts additional array intendation on some lines. I have spent a lot of time debugging the code in beautify.js and have made some workarounds for comment handling, but the array indentation bug is annoying. Is there a correct and properly working JS code formatter anywhere that can be used as part of a source code indentation verification system? EDIT I have now tested with preserve-array-formating disabled, and it seems that it solves the problem. Too bad, since preserve-array-formating is quite useful with large array constructs.

    Read the article

  • Why can't I roll a loop in Javascript?

    - by Carl Manaster
    I am working on a web page that uses dojo and has a number (6 in my test case, but variable in general) of project widgets on it. I'm invoking dojo.addOnLoad(init), and in my init() function I have these lines: dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + 0).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(0);}); dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + 1).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(1);}); dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + 2).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(2);}); dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + 3).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(3);}); dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + 4).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(4);}); dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + 5).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(5);}); and change events for my project widgets properly invoke the makeMatch function. But if I replace them with a loop: for (var i = 0; i < 6; i++) dojo.connect(dijit.byId("project" + i).InputNode, "onChange", function() {makeMatch(i);}); same makeMatch() function, same init() invocation, same everything else - just rolling my calls up into a loop - the makeMatch function is never called; the objects are not wired. What's going on, and how do I fix it? I've tried using dojo.query, but its behavior is the same as the for loop case.

    Read the article

  • javascript mouse cursor change on page load in firefox browser 3.5

    - by Amit
    Hi in case of full page submit a trasparent div id coming and changing the cursor to 'wait' . Now when the page is getting submitted and new page is coming up cursor still remains to 'wait' not changing to default until mouse is moved in Firefox Here is simple html click on show button div is coming when user move mouse over the div cursor is changing as wait cursor. Now when this page is loaded again pressing F5 cursor remain as wait cursor in firefox its working fine in IE is there any way to make the cursor as default on pageload in Firefox <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" /> <title>Untitled Document</title> <style> body{ cursor:default; } </style> <script src="js/jquery.js"> </script> <script> var test = true; $(document).ready(function(){ $('#maindiv').css('display','none') }); function showDiv(){ $('#maindiv').css('display','block') } </script> </head> <body> <div id="divBody" style="background-color:red;width:500px;height:500px" >aa <div id="maindiv" style="background-color:#999999;height:100$;width:400px;height:400px;cursor:wait"> sss </div>aa </div> <input type="button" value="show" onclick="showDiv()"/> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Is linking a <div> using javascript acceptable?

    - by jhchawk
    I want to link an entire <div>, but CSS2 does not support adding an href to a div (or span for that matter). My solution is to use the onClick property to add a link. Is this acceptable for modern browsers? Example code: <div class="frommage_box" id="about_frommage" onclick="location.href='#';"> <div class="frommage_textbox" id="ft_1"><p>who is Hawk Design?</p></div> My test page is at http://www.designbyhawk.com/pixel. Updated daily. Thanks for the help.

    Read the article

  • jQuery/javascript events - prototype event handler

    - by Brian M. Hunt
    The following code doesn't work as I intuitively expect it to: function MyObject(input) { input.change(this._foo); this.X = undefined; } MyObject.prototype._foo = function() { alert("This code is never called"); // but if it did this.X = true; } var test_input = $("input#xyz"); // a random, existing input var m = MyObject(test_input); // attach handler (or try to) test_input.change(); // trigger event alert(m.X); // undefined I'd expect that _foo() would be called (and, if that ever happens, that the this variable in _foo() would be an instantiation of MyObject. Does anyone know why this doesn't work, and of any alternative pattern for passing an object to an event handler? Thank you for reading. Brian

    Read the article

  • How to disable back button in browser using javascript or any script

    - by user225269
    Im using wamp server for my php scripts. And Im having difficulties on the logout code. Every time I click on the logout link and then click on the back button on web browser it still shows the page which can only be access by the user who is logged in. I have this code at the beginning of the index.php which is called by the log out link to destroy the session: <?php session_start(); session_destroy(); ?> And I have this at the beginning of the user page: <? session_start(); if(!session_is_registered(myusername)){ header("location:login.php"); } ?> I don't know why the userpage can still be access after the user has logged out. So I'm thinking of disabling the back button when the user has logged out. Please help.

    Read the article

  • javascript image toggling

    - by Sunil Ramu
    I have a tree view which has a folder icon by default and once clicked it has to be changed to a checkbox icon. And further on clicking the checkbox icon should display a folder icon. Sample Code, Server side : c# htmlSb.AppendFormat(" {0}", emptyContent); JS code var Test= new Object(); Test.Controls=new Object(); Test.Controls.TreeView = new Object(); **Test.Controls.TreeView.SelectNode = function (TreeId, nodeLabel) { $("#" + TreeId + " li span, ul li span").css("background-color", "transparent"); nodeLabel.style.backgroundColor = "white"; nodeLabel.style.background = "url(../images/selected.gif) 0 0 no-repeat"; }** The other Image : if (nodeLabel.style.background = "url(../images/folderclosed.gif) 0 0 no-repeat") I need to toggle between "selected.gif" and "folderclosed.gif" images. If one is clicked the other should display. and vice versa. Please help.

    Read the article

  • Generate and download a text file in javascript

    - by Mark B
    All my research so far suggests this can't be done, but I'm hoping someone here has some cunning ideas. I have a form on a website which allows users to bulk upload lots of URLs to add to a list on the server. There's quite a lot of server-side processing to do on each URL, so to avoid timeouts and to display progress, I've implemented the upload using jQuery to submit the URLs one at a time using ajax. This is all working nicely. However, part of the processing on each URL is deduplicating it against the complete list. The ajax call returns a status indicating either a successful upload or a rejection due to duplication. As the upload progresses, I tell the user how many URLs have been rejected as duplicates (along with overall progress and ETA). The problem now is how to give the user a complete list of the failed duplicate URLs. I've kept them in an array in my jQuery, and would like the user to be able to click on a link on the form to download a text file containing those URLs. Is this possible just using client-side processing? The server-side processing basically handles a single keyword at a time. I'd rather not have to store the duplicates in a database table with some kind of session key which gets sent with every ajax call, and is then used at the end to generate the text file server-side (and then gets cleaned up some time later). I can see how to do this, but it seems very clunky and a bit 20th century.

    Read the article

  • How to reference an anonymous JavaScript function?

    - by ProfK
    I'm trying to call a Page Method using a jQuery 'attached' event function, in which I like to use the closure to keep the event target local, as below, but page method calls declare several 'error' functions, and I would like to use one function for all of them. If, in the below code, I was handling an error and not success, how could I use my single, anonymous handler for all 3 error functions? $(":button").click(function () { var button = this; PageMethods.DoIt( function (a, b, c) { alert(button); }); }); This example passes an anonymous function for the success callback. There is only one of these. If I was passing an error callback, how could I use 'function (e, c, t)' for all 3 error callbacks?

    Read the article

  • How can I pass methods in javascript?

    - by peterjwest
    I often need to pass methods from objects into other objects. However I usually want the method to be attached to the original object (by attached I mean 'this' should refer to the original object). I know a few ways to do this: a) In the object constructor: ObjectA = function() { var that = this; var method = function(a,b,c) { that.abc = a+b+c }} b) In objectA which has been passed objectB: objectB.assign(function(a,b,c) { that.method(a,b,c) }) c) Outside both objects: objectB.assign(function(a,b,c) { objectA.method(a,b,c) }) I want to know if there is a simpler way to pass methods attached to their original objects.

    Read the article

  • Pyjamas & JavaScript: Too much recursion

    - by Wraith
    I'm doing a Pyjamas example and get this error: TodoApp InternalError: too much recursion Has anyone else encountered this? Some articles around the web recommend adjusting the C++ code of your browser to fix it, but that doesn't seem safe to me.

    Read the article

  • Strange behavior with Javascript's __defineSetter__

    - by Shea Barton
    I have a large project in which I need to intercept assignments to things like element.src, element.href, element.style, etc. I figured out to do this with defineSetter, but it is behaving very strangely (using Chrome 8.0.552.231) An example: var attribs = ["href", "src", "background", "action", "onblur", "style", "onchange", "onclick", "ondblclick", "onerror", "onfocus", "onkeydown", "onkeypress", "onkeyup", "onmousedown", "onmousemove", "onmouseover", "onmouseup", "onresize", "onselect", "onunload"]; for(a = 0; a < attribs.length; a++) { var attrib_name = attribs[a]; var func = new Function("attrib_value", "this.setAttribute(\"" + attrib_name + "\", attrib_value.toUpperCase());"); HTMLElement.prototype.__defineSetter__(attrib_name, func); } What this code should do is whenever common element attribute in attribs is assigned, it uses setAttribute() to set a uppercased version of that attribute. For some very strange reason, the setter works for only ~1/3 of the assignments. For example with element.src = "test" the new src is "TEST", like it should be however with element.href = "test" the new href is "test", not uppercase then even when I try element.__lookupSetter__("href"), it returns the proper, uppercasing setter the strangest thing is different variables are intercepted properly between Chrome and Firefox help!!

    Read the article

  • javascript and extJs - scope question

    - by ben
    Hi guys, I got a little scope related problem with some js code, maybe somebody can explain to me what I'm making wrong: I'm using extJs and got this snippet: Ext.onReady(function(){ // Form for filter selection var formFilter = new Ext.FormPanel({ // ... items: [ cbGroup = new Ext.form.ComboBox({ fieldLabel: 'Group', store: dsGroups, displayField: 'name', valueField: 'number', emptyText : '- Please choose a group -', listeners:{ 'select': function() { alert(cbGroup.selectedIndex +' '+this.selectedIndex); } } }) ] }); }); The problem: When I access the combobox over 'this' within the listener function, I get the correct result for the selectIndex property. When I access the combobox over it's var name, I allways get the result '-1'. Thank a lot for your help!

    Read the article

  • Firefox, prevent rendering between javascript statements.

    - by Erik
    I'm trying to create some kind of zoom around the mouse cursor feature on my website which ultimately runs these two lines (+ the same for height/scrollTop). canvas.style.width = someValue; canvas.parentNode.scrollLeft = someOtherValue; The problem is that in firefox(3.6) the page is re-rendered directly after the first row has been executed and since the view is depending on both values this means that every time i recalculate the view firefox will will render an invalid view before the correct one, in other words creating flicker. I've tried swapping the two rows but get the same problem. In chrome, opera and IE this doesn't happen. Both lines are executed before any rendering is done. Is there any way to lock the rendering manually, maybe something like this? document.disableRendering(); //fantasy function canvas.style.width = someValue; canvas.parentNode.scrollLeft = someOtherValue; document.enableRendering(); //fantasy function

    Read the article

  • javascript problem in IE8

    - by Pankaj
    This code is not working on IE8 window.open(url, "find_users", "resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,menubar=no,toolbar=no,location=no,status=yes,height=300,width=500"); I am getting Object Expected error in only IE8, its working fine in all other brouser.

    Read the article

  • Javascript: Enable checkboxes list when a checkbox is checked (With Prototype)

    - by BoDiE2003
    Guys, Ive been using jquery to do this, but now I need to do it with Prototype and Im little confused due lack of documentation I have 2 lists of check boxes First List: Check box 1 Check box 2 Second list: Check box x check box y check box z I need the JS code, using prototype to work like this: Second list, remains disabled unless I check one of the checkboxes of the First List. Any suggestions, or help, please! Thankyou.

    Read the article

  • performing a javascript event without triggering that event handler

    - by bento
    In my latest code, I have an event handler for a focus on a textarea. When the user clicks on the textarea, that event-handler is triggered which sets some other DOM states based on the selected textarea. However, elsewhere in my program I want to programmatically set the focus of the textarea without triggering that event handler. I know Backbone, for instance, has a way to silently perform an action. My only pseudo-solution is to temporarily set a variable: var silence = true; And then, in my event handler, only perform the logic if silence is false. The handler is still triggered, but the logic doesn't run. Does anyone else know of better strategies for this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178  | Next Page >