Search Results

Search found 32130 results on 1286 pages for 'local search'.

Page 18/1286 | < Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >

  • Make thunderbird store all mail locally for IMAP accounts but not indexing all for search

    - by rubo77
    In Thunderbird the global gloda search is connected to the selection of downloaded/syncronized folders of the IMAP accounts in the Offline-settings. Is it possible somehow, that Thunderbirds download/syncs all emails in the IMAP account but does not add them to the index for the global search? I would like to do this because I have some accounts that I only keep in thunderbird for archiving reasons but I don't want to find those mails, when I use the global search

    Read the article

  • Firefox - built in search engine toolbar broken

    - by Victor78
    When I change the order of the search engines (Toolbar - Manage Search Engines - Move up / down - Ok) it changes the order, until I close and reopen the browser. I can't imagine that's the way it's supposed to work. I want it to stay in the order I select. I have no add-ons installed that have anything to do with search engines, nor that add any toolbars. I am not using a customized theme. Apparently this problem is rare, as Googling [ "manage search engine list" ("order reverts" OR "order changes") ] return 0 results. Firefox 3.6.12; Windows XP Pro SP3.

    Read the article

  • Windows 7 Start Menu Search is not indexing?

    - by ahmetalpbalkan
    I upgraded my Vista Ultimate to Win 7 Professional. I have configured all the search indexing settings, however search box in the start menu does not bring any result at all in the indexed folders. It says a few thousands of files are indexed but nothing appears in start menu search. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Integrate BING API for Search inside ASP.Net web application

    - by sreejukg
    As you might already know, Bing is the Microsoft Search engine and is getting popular day by day. Bing offers APIs that can be integrated into your website to increase your website functionality. At this moment, there are two important APIs available. They are Bing Search API Bing Maps The Search API enables you to build applications that utilize Bing’s technology. The API allows you to search multiple source types such as web; images, video etc. and supports various output prototypes such as JSON, XML, and SOAP. Also you will be able to customize the search results as you wish for your public facing website. Bing Maps API allows you to build robust applications that use Bing Maps. In this article I am going to describe, how you can integrate Bing search into your website. In order to start using Bing, First you need to sign in to http://www.bing.com/toolbox/bingdeveloper/ using your windows live credentials. Click on the Sign in button, you will be asked to enter your windows live credentials. Once signed in you will be redirected to the Developer page. Here you can create applications and get AppID for each application. Since I am a first time user, I don’t have any applications added. Click on the Add button to add a new application. You will be asked to enter certain details about your application. The fields are straight forward, only thing you need to note is the website field, here you need to enter the website address from where you are going to use this application, and this field is optional too. Of course you need to agree on the terms and conditions and then click Save. Once you click on save, the application will be created and application ID will be available for your use. Now we got the APP Id. Basically Bing supports three protocols. They are JSON, XML and SOAP. JSON is useful if you want to call the search requests directly from the browser and use JavaScript to parse the results, thus JSON is the favorite choice for AJAX application. XML is the alternative for applications that does not support SOAP, e.g. flash/ Silverlight etc. SOAP is ideal for strongly typed languages and gives a request/response object model. In this article I am going to demonstrate how to search BING API using SOAP protocol from an ASP.Net application. For the purpose of this demonstration, I am going to create an ASP.Net project and implement the search functionality in an aspx page. Open Visual Studio, navigate to File-> New Project, select ASP.Net empty web application, I named the project as “BingSearchSample”. Add a Search.aspx page to the project, once added the solution explorer will looks similar to the following. Now you need to add a web reference to the SOAP service available from Bing. To do this, from the solution explorer, right click your project, select Add Service Reference. Now the new service reference dialog will appear. In the left bottom of the dialog, you can find advanced button, click on it. Now the service reference settings dialog will appear. In the bottom left, you can find Add Web Reference button, click on it. The add web reference dialog will appear now. Enter the URL as http://api.bing.net/search.wsdl?AppID=<YourAppIDHere>&version=2.2 (replace <yourAppIDHere> with the appID you have generated previously) and click on the button next to it. This will find the web service methods available. You can change the namespace suggested by Bing, but for the purpose of this demonstration I have accepted all the default settings. Click on the Add reference button once you are done. Now the web reference to Search service will be added your project. You can find this under solution explorer of your project. Now in the Search.aspx, that you previously created, place one textbox, button and a grid view. For the purpose of this demonstration, I have given the identifiers (ID) as txtSearch, btnSearch, gvSearch respectively. The idea is to search the text entered in the text box using Bing service and show the results in the grid view. In the design view, the search.aspx looks as follows. In the search.aspx.cs page, add a using statement that points to net.bing.api. I have added the following code for button click event handler. The code is very straight forward. It just calls the service with your AppID, a query to search and a source for searching. Let us run this page and see the output when I enter Microsoft in my textbox. If you want to search a specific site, you can include the site name in the query parameter. For e.g. the following query will search the word Microsoft from www.microsoft.com website. searchRequest.Query = “site:www.microsoft.com Microsoft”; The output of this query is as follows. Integrating BING search API to your website is easy and there is no limit on the customization of the interface you can do. There is no Bing branding required so I believe this is a great option for web developers when they plan for site search.

    Read the article

  • Question regarding the method local innerclasses accesing the local variables of the method

    - by flash
    Hi I was going through the SCJP book about the innerclasses, and found this statement, it goes something like this. "A method local class can only refer to the local variables which are marked final" and in the explanation the reason specified is about the scope and lifetime of the local class object and the local variables on the heap, But I am unable to understand that.am I missing anything here about 'final'??

    Read the article

  • How to send local mail via postfix to another server

    - by scotts
    I have postfix set up for use as an STMP server to send mail for my domain, but I receive email for the domain via gmail/google apps. The reason I use my own postfix is because I send out a lot of transactional emails to my customers using a web app, and the volume would exceed what google allows with its SMTP servers. Everything works fine, except cron & system mail gets routed to local users on the server, not to the appropriate accounts at google mail. How can I route this system mail to the respective google mail accounts instead?

    Read the article

  • How can I add a Google search box to my website? [migrated]

    - by wahle509
    I am trying to add a Google search box to my own website. I would like it to search Google itself, not my site. There was some code I had that use to work, but no longer does: <form method="get" action="https://www.google.com/search"> <input type="text" name="g" size="31" value=""> </form> When I try making a search, it just directs to the Google homepage. Well, actually it directs here: https://www.google.com/webhp Does anyone have a different solution? What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Why do Google search results include pages disallowed in robots.txt?

    - by Ilmari Karonen
    I have some pages on my site that I want to keep search engines away from, so I disallowed them in my robots.txt file like this: User-Agent: * Disallow: /email Yet I recently noticed that Google still sometimes returns links to those pages in their search results. Why does this happen, and how can I stop it? Background: Several years ago, I made a simple web site for a club a relative of mine was involved in. They wanted to have e-mail links on their pages, so, to try and keep those e-mail addresses from ending up on too many spam lists, instead of using direct mailto: links I made those links point to a simple redirector / address harvester trap script running on my own site. This script would return either a 301 redirect to the actual mailto: URL, or, if it detected a suspicious access pattern, a page containing lots of random fake e-mail addresses and links to more such pages. To keep legitimate search bots away from the trap, I set up the robots.txt rule shown above, disallowing the entire space of both legit redirector links and trap pages. Just recently, however, one of the people in the club searched Google for their own name and was quite surprised when one of the results on the first page was a link to the redirector script, with a title consisting of their e-mail address followed by my name. Of course, they immediately e-mailed me and wanted to know how to get their address out of Google's index. I was quite surprised too, since I had no idea that Google would index such URLs at all, seemingly in violation of my robots.txt rule. I did manage to submit a removal request to Google, and it seems to have worked, but I'd like to know why and how Google is circumventing my robots.txt like that and how to make sure that none of the disallowed pages will show up in their search results. Ps. I actually found out a possible explanation and solution, which I'll post below, while preparing this question, but I thought I'd ask it anyway in case someone else might have the same problem. Please do feel free to post your own answers. I'd also be interested in knowing if other search engines do this too, and whether the same solutions work for them also.

    Read the article

  • How do I get a listing of music files on a specific drive

    - by Kevin34
    I'm helping someone setup thier IPOD, but they are using Windows 7, and I know XP. I don't see the music in the directory lising on his computer that I see on the IPOD. So I'm trying to search for all music files on e: In Windows XP, this is easy. Windows 7 has changed everything. I googled this, and I found to type "music" in the Windows search bar. This result in music "Libraries." Great. There's still not a listing of the files. I can search for *.wma, but that doesn't list all the music on the IPOD. There are many types of music files, how do I get a list of ALL music files on JUST drive e:? Again, on XP this was VERY easy.

    Read the article

  • Google Rolls Out Secured Search. It’s Slightly Different From Regular Search

    - by Gopinath
    Google rolled out secured version of it’s search engine at https://google.com (did you notice https instead of http?). This search engine lets everyone to use Google search in a secured way. How is it secured? When you use https://google.com, the data exchanged between your browser and Google servers is encrypted to make sure that no one can sniff it. Is my search history secured from Google? No. The search queries you submit to Google are stored in Google servers. There is no change Google’s search history recording. Any differences between Regular Search and Secured Search Results? Yes. Secured search is slightly different from regular search. When you are accessing Google Secured Search Image search options will not be available on the left side bar. Site may respond slow compared to regular search site as there is a overhead to establish between your browser and the server. Join us on Facebook to read all our stories right inside your Facebook news feed.

    Read the article

  • Experimenting with other search engines

    - by Bill Graziano
    I’ve been a Google user so long I can hardly remember what I used before it.  Alta Vista maybe?  Or Yahoo.  I’ve tried Bing off and on but it never really stuck.  I probably care more about search engines than your average user because of their impact on SQLTeam.com.  Lately I’ve been trying two other search engines and actually switched to one of them. I’ve played with Blekko a little in the past.  They have some interesting ways to “slice up” your results.  For example, searching on “SQL Server /blogs /date” should just search all the recently updated blogs.  Those two extra words on the search are slashtags.  The full list of slashtags runs from /forums to just see forums to /twitter to /nikon to /reviews and on and on and on.  I laughed when I saw they had slashtags for both liberal and conservative.  I’d hate to find any search results that don’t match my existing worldview :)  You can also create your own slashtags.  I created a mini-search engine for the SQL Server blogs that I read.  You can search it for “backup” at http://blekko.com/ws/backup+/billgraziano/sql-sites.  I uploaded my OPML and it limited the search to just those sites.  It seems like the site is focusing more on curating results and less on algorithms.  This is an interesting site for those power searchers.  There are some great ways to curate results using slashtags.  For 99% of my searches (type words, click on one of the first few links) slashtags are overkill.  They do have some good information on page and site ranking though so I’ll probably send some time looking through that. Blekko recently got my attention again when they said they were banning “content farms” - and that includes eHow and experts-exchange.  I always feel used when I click on a link to EE and find myself scrolling all the way to the bottom to see if I can find the answer.  Sometimes it’s there but sometimes it tells me I need to pay first.  I’ve longed for a way to always exclude certain sites.  Blekko might be taking a hammer to a problem that needs a scalpel but it’s an interesting choice.  (And some of the comments in the TechCrunch link are interesting if you’re a search nerd.) DuckDuckGo is an odd name for a search engine.  Their big hook is that they don’t have search history.  If you wade through your Google account you can probably find the page where it stores your search history.  It was pretty enlightening to find mine.  It was easy to disable but that got me started looking at other search engines.  DDG (or DukGo) just feels like Google used to in the old days.  The results are good enough and the site is fast. Searches will return a snippet from WikiPedia or other site (like StackOverflow) at the top.  I think the idea is to answer the question without needing to visit the site.  I’m not sure that’s a good thing for SQLTeam.com. The only thing I really miss is image search.  You can add a “!i” at the end of any search and it will search the images on Bing.  Bing doesn’t have a great image search but it works for most of what I need.  They call these exclamation marks “!bangs” and they are kinda, sorta like slashtags.  I’ve been using DuckDuckGo now for a few weeks and I’m pretty happy with it.  I use Chrome for my browser and it was an easy switch to make.  It’s still a little surprising seeing my search results come up in a different format.  I’m starting to get used to it though.

    Read the article

  • How to use LINQ to SQL to create ranked search results?

    - by quakkels
    I am looking for a way to use l2s to return ranked result based on keywords. I would like to take a keyword and be able to search the table for that keyword using .contains(). The trick that I haven't been able to figure out is how to get a count of how many times that keyqord appears, and then .OrderByDescending() based on that count. So if i had some thing like: string keyword = "SomeKeyword"; IQueryable<Article> searchResults = from a in GenesisRepository.Article where a.Body.Contains(keyword) select a; What is the best way to order searchResults based on the number of times keyword appears in a.Body? Thanks for any help.

    Read the article

  • What does "Don't use the index when searching in file folders for system files" do?

    - by A Student at a University
    I've checked "Don't use the index when searching in file folders for system files", but I don't see a way to tell Windows 7 that I'm looking for a system file. What does this option actually do, and how do I use it to search every file name on the drive for a specified character string? I intend to search file names in an indexed folder that contains non-indexed subfolders and "system" file types, and this option seems to have no effect on the skipping of those subfolders and file types.

    Read the article

  • How to remove MySQL completely with config and library files?

    - by codeartist
    I tried everything till now: sudo apt-get remove mysql-server mysql-client mysql-common sudo apt-get purge mysql-server mysql-client mysql-common sudo apt-get autoremove and even more commands... But whenever I am trying to locate mysql. I get a no. of files related to mysql command: shell>> locate mysql Output: /etc/mysql /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mysql /etc/apparmor.d/cache/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/apparmor.d/cache/usr.sbin.mysqld-akonadi /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.mysqld /etc/bash_completion.d/mysqladmin /etc/init/mysql.conf /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.paranoid/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.workstation/mysql-server-5_5 /etc/logrotate.d/mysql-server /etc/mysql/conf.d /etc/mysql/debian-start /etc/mysql/debian.cnf /etc/mysql/conf.d/mysqld_safe_syslog.cnf /home/pkr/.mysql_history /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,libqt4-sql-mysql,,349051c3a57da571aa832adb39177aff /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,mysql-client,,cbf77a486cdc80547317981a33144427 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/piston-helper/rec.ubuntu.com,api,1.0,recommend_app,mysql-client,,de8220dee4d957a9502caa79e8d2fdda /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,any,any,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,17fb2e657321dc51526ee8fe9928da30 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,any,any,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,a4c1b6e8200f36ab5745c6f81f14da0a /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,oneiric,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,c54295fb82b8183350cd34f22c3547ef /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,oneiric,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,fcf201c1abff3f774af89173a84de2cc /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,precise,any,libqt4-sql-mysql,page,1,helpful,,0cd86648584efeccfb16119012f89540 /home/pkr/.cache/software-center/rnrclient/reviews.ubuntu.com,reviews,api,1.0,reviews,filter,en,ubuntu,precise,any,mysql-client,page,1,helpful,,eb84724e9da7851ff8862a227d8bac59 /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/mysql.conf /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql.err.old /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/columns_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/db.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/event.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/func.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.CSM /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.CSV /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/general_log.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_category.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_keyword.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_relation.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/help_topic.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/host.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/ndb_binlog_index.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/plugin.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proc.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/procs_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/proxies_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/servers.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.CSM /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.CSV /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/slow_log.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/tables_priv.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_leap_second.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_name.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/time_zone_transition_type.frm /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.MYD /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.MYI /home/pkr/.local/share/akonadi/db_data/mysql/user.frm /usr/bin/mysql /usr/bin/mysql_install_db /usr/bin/mysql_upgrade /usr/bin/mysqlcheck /usr/sbin/mysqld /usr/share/mysql /usr/share/app-install/desktop/gmysqlcc:gmysqlcc.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-client.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-navigator:mysql-navigator.desktop /usr/share/app-install/desktop/mysql-server.desktop /usr/share/app-install/icons/gmysqlcc-32.png /usr/share/app-install/icons/mysql-navigator.png /usr/share/doc/mysql-client-core-5.5 /usr/share/doc/mysql-server-core-5.5 /usr/share/kde4/apps/katepart/syntax/sql-mysql.xml /usr/share/man/man1/mysql.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_install_db.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_upgrade.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlcheck.1.gz /usr/share/man/man8/mysqld.8.gz /var/cache/apt/archives/akonadi-backend-mysql_1.7.2-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmysqlclient-dev_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libmysqlclient18_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/libqt4-sql-mysql_4%3a4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client-core-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-client_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-common_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server-core-5.5_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_i386.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/mysql-server_5.5.22-0ubuntu1_all.deb /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-client-core-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-client-core-5.5.md5sums /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-5.5.postrm /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-core-5.5.list /var/lib/dpkg/info/mysql-server-core-5.5.md5sums /var/log/mysql /var/log/mysql.err /var/log/mysql.log /var/log/mysql.log.1.gz /var/log/mysql.log.2.gz /var/log/mysql.log.3.gz /var/log/mysql.log.4.gz /var/log/mysql.log.5.gz /var/log/mysql.log.6.gz /var/log/mysql.log.7.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.1.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.2.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.3.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.4.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.5.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.6.gz /var/log/upstart/mysql.log.7.gz What should I do now? Please help me out in this :( I was trying to find out if there is any way I can remove mysql related every file and then reinstall mysql. I need it for Qt connectivity. I don't understand what to do! Please help :(

    Read the article

  • Fogbugz search broken

    - by apollodude217
    The Search feature on our Fogbugz server is broken. It can look up case numbers just fine, but when I search for text, I get the following: FogBugz Internal Error An internal error occurred in FogBugz. If you are unsure of how to fix this error, and you have made no changes to the source code of FogBugz, please report this error to Fog Creek Software by clicking "Submit." File: /FogBugz/list.asp Line: 1465 Error: nErr = 100 nErr = -2146232832 Unable to find the specified file: _254m.fnm at FogUtil.Search.Store.Directory.GetFile(String name) at FogUtil.Search.Store.Directory.OpenInput(String name) at Lucene.Net.Index.FieldInfos..ctor(Directory d, String name) at Lucene.Net.Index.SegmentReader.Initialize(SegmentInfo si) at Lucene.Net.Index.SegmentReader.Get(Directory dir, SegmentInfo si, SegmentInfos sis, Boolean closeDir, Boolean ownDir) at Lucene.Net.Index.SegmentReader.Get(SegmentInfo si) at Lucene.Net.Index.IndexReader.AnonymousClassWith.DoBody() at Lucene.Net.Store.Lock.With.Run() at Lucene.Net.Index.IndexReader.Open(Directory directory, Boolean closeDirectory) at Lucene.Net.Index.IndexReader.Open(Directory directory) at FogUtil.Search.Index.LoadReadonlyReader() at FogUtil.Search.Index.LoadSearcher() at FogUtil.Search.QueryGenerator.Execute(Object querytokens, Boolean fMSSQL, Boolean fMySQL, String sFilterKey, String sFilterValues) at FogUtil.Search.Index.Execute(Object query, Boolean fMSSQL, Boolean fMySQL, String sFilterKey, String sFilterValues) Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 GTB6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Number: 0x800A0064 Category: Microsoft VBScript runtime Column: -1 OS Version: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 5.2.3790 Database: Microsoft SQL Server CLR Versions: 1033|v1.0.3705|v1.1.4322|v2.0.50727|v3.0 QueryString: pre=preMultiSearch&pg=pgList&pgBack=pgSearch&search=2&searchFor=asdf&sLastSearchString=&sLastSearchStringJSArgs=%27%27%2C%27%27%2C%27%27 URL: /FogBugz/default.asp Content Length: 0 Local Addr: 172.22.22.15 Remote Addr: 172.16.55.25 Time: 4/27/2010 2:45:39 PM Does anyone know what this problem is or how to fix it?

    Read the article

  • Manipulate score/rank on query results from NHibernate.Search

    - by Fernando Figueiredo
    I've been working with NHibernate, NHibernate.Search and Lucene.Net to improve the search engine used on the website I develop. Basically, I use it to search contents of corporations specification documents. This is not to be confused with Lucene's notion of documents: in my case, a specification document (which I'll hereafter call a "specdoc") can contain many pages, and the content of these pages are the ones that are actually indexed (thus, the pages themselves are the ones that fall into Lucene's concept of documents). So, the pages belong to a specdoc, that in turn belong to a corporation (so, a corporation can have many specdocs). I'm using NHibernate.Search "IndexEmbedded" and "ContainedIn" attributes to associate the pages with their specdoc and the specdocs to their corporations, so I can query for terms in specdoc pages and have Lucene/NH.Search return either the pages themselves, the specdocs, or the corporations that match the query on the pages. I can query this way and get ranked results, thus presenting results (that is, corporations, specdocs or pages) by relevance, which is great. But now I need something more. Specifically in the case where I query terms and have NH.Search return the corporations that match, I need to manually/artificially tune the score of some of the results, because there are corporations that I want to show up on the top of the result set - think of "sponsored results". I'm thinking of doing it on my application, maybe creating an entity/database table that contain an association to the corporation entity, and a score boost value. But I don't know how to feed this to Lucene and have it boost the results accordingly at search time. Initially I thought about deriving a Similarity class to do this, but it doesn't look like Similarity can be used to modify result sets at search time. As per this page, it looks like what I need is to mess around with weight or scoring. But the docs are a little superficial in that there are no examples on how to implement a custom scoring, let alone integrate it with NH.Search. So, does anyone know how to do this, or point me to some documentation or working example on how to do something similar? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Correct method to search for AD user by email address from .NET

    - by BrianLy
    I'm having some issues with code that is intended to find a user in Active Directory by searching on their email address. I have tried 2 methods but I'm sometimes finding that the FindOne() method will not return any results on some occasions. If I look up the user in the GAL in Outlook I see the SMTP email address listed. My end goal is to confirm that the user exists in AD. I only have the email address as search criteria, so no way to use first or last name. Method 1: Using mail property: DirectorySearcher search = new DirectorySearcher(entry); search.Filter = "(mail=" + email + ")"; search.PropertiesToLoad.Add("mail"); SearchResult result = search.FindOne(); Method 2: proxyAddresses property: DirectorySearcher search = new DirectorySearcher(entry); search.Filter = "(proxyAddresses=SMTP:" + email + ")"; // I've also tried with =smtp: search.PropertiesToLoad.Add("mail"); SearchResult result = search.FindOne(); I've tried changing the case of the email address input but it still does not return a result. Is there a problem here with case sensitivity? If so, what is the best way to resolve it?

    Read the article

  • Is there a search engine that indexes source code of a web-page?

    - by Dexter
    I need to search the web for sites that are in our industry that use the same Adwords management company, to ensure that the said company is not violating our contract, as they have been accused of doing. They use a tracking code in the template of every page which has a certain domain in the URL, and I'm wondering if it's possible "Google" the source code using some bot that crawls the code rather than the content? For example, I bought an unlimited license for an image gallery, and I was asked to type the license number in a comment just before the script. I thought it was just so a human could look at the source and find out if someone paid, but it turned out that it was actually that they had a crawler looking for their source code and that comment. If it ran across the code on your site, it would look for the comment, and if it found one, it would check to see if it was an existing one. If not, it would first notify you of your noncompliance, and then notify the owner of the script. Edit: I'm looking to index HTML and JavaScript only, not the server-side languages or Java.

    Read the article

  • Dlink search is hijacking my browser

    - by James
    For months now "DLink search" has been hijacking my search engines. I use google chrome, and I have organized my search engines in the handy dandy "manage search engines" tool about a TRILLION times. It never even says D-link is hacking my search engines. It does not show up! I have read many posts on this forum and others saying that to fix this problem from internet explorer: Setup, internet options, yadayada, magical fairies, and you are solved, but my browser is google chrome! How am I supposed to do this from there! I do not know how to re-setup my Dlink router, which is the cause of the problem! HOW? In those posts with the magical fairies fixing it, HUNDREDS responded saying, "yep, those fairies definitely fixed it right. :)" These people were so satisfied. IT WORKED FOR THEM, WHY NOT ME. I look at it and go ":(" because it does not help me. There are no options for anything to do with this in GOOGLE chrome. PLEASE EXPLAIN and HELP. I see no "SETUP" option, no "Internet Options" button, no anything. BTW the exact posts are these: "Uncheck Advanced DNS in the router internet setup. This will take care of it. I had this problem with my DLink router before." "I had this issue with my DIR-655 and unchecking the Advanced DNS setting in Setup - Internet - Manual Internet Connection Setup fixed it." "If this is just internet explorer, you can go to Tools Internet Options or Internet Options in Control Panel. From here, go to the advanced tab and click the Reset button." "I would set the router's DNS to a site like OpenDNS, and I would ensure the machines are set to get their DNS settings via DHCP or set the machine's DNS setting to OpenDNS. If the router's DNS looks like it was messed with, some bad software know the default passwords for routers and could have changed it. If you don't already I would make sure the password to the router is not default or easy to guess. I've had spyware change a machine's DNS, but the fact it is happening on all machines makes me wonder if it is the router." "Something got into your router and changed the dns server most likely, do a hard reset of the router and then change the password to something strong. Also check for a firmware update for the router and apply it as soon as possible."

    Read the article

  • Rails, search item in different model?

    - by Danny McClelland
    Hi Everyone, I have a kase model which I am using a simple search form in. The problem I am having is some kases are linked to companies through a company model, and people through a people model. At the moment my search (in Kase model) looks like this: # SEARCH FACILITY def self.search(search) search_condition = "%" + search + "%" find(:all, :conditions => ['jobno LIKE ? OR casesubject LIKE ? OR transport LIKE ? OR goods LIKE ? OR comments LIKE ? OR invoicenumber LIKE ? OR netamount LIKE ? OR clientref LIKE ? OR kase_status LIKE ? OR lyingatlocationaddresscity LIKE ?', search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition, search_condition]) end What I am trying to work out, is what condition can I add to allow a search by Company or Person to show the cases they are linked to. @kase.company.companyname and company.companyname don't work :( Is this possible? Thanks, Danny

    Read the article

  • Advanced search functionality

    - by Chris
    I have a website with a jQuery based autocomplete search functionality which works great. Currently though I have just one search box for all categories, what I want is for someone to be able to type in, say for example, dorian gray dvd (in any order) which will search for dorian gray within the dvd category. What this will require then is a bit of magic on the server side to figure out if any of the words are category keywords, and then limit the search by that. What is the best (and quickest) way to do this in PHP / MySQL? I currently have a few trains of thought Search the category table for matches and perhaps order the results by that. Or split up the search terms into an array and separately search the categories for that for a match. Another thought I just had is to concat the category title to the dvd title in the database and match against that, or something similar... but this sounds computationally expensive? Any advice?

    Read the article

  • SharePoint Search: processing filenames containing underscores

    - by Todd Owen
    We use SharePoint Server 2007 to allow employees to search network file shares, but it seems that underscores in filenames are not treated as word separators when indexing the files. As a result, a search for chocolate will: match "chocolate milkshake.doc" but not match "chocolate_cake.doc" (Of course, this is a simplified example; in practice the content of the second file might include the word "chocolate" and match on that instead of the filename. But the problem itself is real enough, because a common scenario in a corporate environment is that a user knows the the partial name of the file they are looking for and expects to see matching filenames at the top of the search results. And using underscores in filenames is a widely used convention within our company). Underscores are not treated as word separators in the file content either, although this is less of a concern for us. The root cause of this problem is possibly related to the behaviour of the word breakers that SharePoint uses (i.e. the language-specific DLLs that implement the IWorkBreaker interface), although I haven't confirmed this yet. Does anyone know of a workaround for this issue? I have tested with Search Server 2008 Express too (which is based on the same technology), and it is also affected. I do not know whether the problem is fixed in SharePoint 2010 or not.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >