Search Results

Search found 14313 results on 573 pages for 'private clouds'.

Page 187/573 | < Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >

• JPA: Database Generated columns

  - by jpanewbie

  Hello, I am facing an issue with Hiebrnate and JPA. My requirement is column CreatedDTTM and LastUPDATEDDTTM should be populated at the DB level. I have tried following but no use. My columns are set NOT NULL. I get a "cannot insert Null into LastUpdatedDttm" exception. Any guidance is appreciated. @Column(name="LAST_UPDATED_DTTM", insertable=false, updatable=false, columnDefinition="Date default SYSDATE") @org.hibernate.annotations.Generated(value=GenerationTime.INSERT) @Temporal(javax.persistence.TemporalType.DATE) private Date lastUpdDTTM; @Column(name="CREATED_DTTM”, insertable=false, updatable=false) @org.hibernate.annotations.Generated(value=GenerationTime.ALWAYS) @Temporal(javax.persistence.TemporalType.DATE) private Date createdDTTM;

  Read the article

• use class in another windows form c# ???

  - by Chelsea_cole

  I have a problem in a same namespace: public partial class frmForm1 : Form // Form1 { public class Account { public string Username; public string Password; public string RePassword; public string Name; public string bd; public string dt; public string dc; } public class ListAcc { public static int count = 0; private static List<Account> UserList; public static List<Account> Data() { return UserList; } } } public partial class frmForm2 : Form // Form2 { private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { ListAcc A; // error string n = A<Account>[0].Usename; // error // What should i do? } } Someone can help me fix this problem? Thanks alot!

  Read the article

• Full automatic application trace for .net v4

  - by JL

  I would like to implement a way to trace every line of code in an application that is written for .net v4.0. An example would be. If I had the following function. private bool hasValue(string value) { if(string.isnullorempty(value) { return false; } else { return true; }} Then when the function is called I want detailed trace logs to contain something like this: Function called |Line 10 |Signature private bool hasValue(string value)|ValuesPassed hasValue("") Line Evaluated | Line 11 | if(string.isnullorempty(value) |ValuesPassed if(string.isnullorempty("") - evaluation returned true entered line 13 |signature return false|return action taken. This tracing can be done manually, but its a lot of work, and would dirty the code. Isn't there a way to get this level of tracing automatically with .net or 3rd party plugin? Thank you

  Read the article

• How to bind WPF TreeView to a List<Drink> programmatically?

  - by Joan Venge

  So I am very new to WPF and trying to bind or assign a list of Drink values to a wpf treeview, but don't know how to do that, and find it really hard to find anything online that just shows stuff without using xaml. struct Drink { public string Name { get; private set; } public int Popularity { get; private set; } public Drink ( string name, int popularity ) : this ( ) { this.Name = name; this.Popularity = popularity; } } List<Drink> coldDrinks = new List<Drink> ( ){ new Drink ( "Water", 1 ), new Drink ( "Fanta", 2 ), new Drink ( "Sprite", 3 ), new Drink ( "Coke", 4 ), new Drink ( "Milk", 5 ) }; } } How can I do this in code? For example: treeview1.DataItems = coldDrinks; and everything shows up in the treeview.

  Read the article

• AS3: Performance question calling an event function with null param

  - by adehaas

  Lately I needed to call a listener function without an actual listener like so: foo(null); private function foo(event:Event):void { //do something } So I was wondering if there is a significant difference regarding performance between this and using the following, in which I can prevent the null in calling the function without the listener, but am still able to call it with a listener as well: foo(); private function foo(event:Event = null):void { } I am not sure wether it is just a question of style, or actually bad practice and I should write two similar functions, one with and one without the event param (which seems cumbersome to me). Looking forward to your opinions, thx.

  Read the article

• How to get value from Java object

  - by JSF User

  I have this Java object private List<NewAccountObj> dataList; public class NewAccountObj { private int userid; public NewAccountObj(int userid) { this.userid = userid; } public int getUserid() { return userid; } public void setUserid(int userid) { this.userid = userid; } public List<NewAccountObj> getdataList() { return dataList; } What is the proper way to access a value from the object? Is this correct? <h:inputText id="userid" value="#{NewAccountController.dataList.userid}" validator="#{ValidatorAccountController.validateUserID}" autocomplete="off"> <f:ajax event="blur" render="useridvalidator" /> </h:inputText> Is there any other solution?

  Read the article

• MySqlConnection really not close

  - by stighy

  Hi guys, i've a huge problem. Take a look to this sample code private sub FUNCTION1() dim conn as new mysqlconnection(myconnstring) conn.open ---- do something FUNCTION2() ---- conn.close end sub private sub FUNCTION2() dim conn as new mysqlconnection(myconnstring) .... conn.open -- do something conn.close end sub Despite i close regulary all my connection, they remains "open" on the mysql server. I know this because i'm using MySQL Administration tool to check how many connection i open "line by line" of my source code. In fact i get a lot of time "user has exceeded the 'max_user_connections' resource (current value: 5)" My hoster permit ONLY 5 connection, but i think that if i write GOOD source code, this cannot be a problem. So my question is: why that "damn" connections remain open ?? Thank you in advance!

  Read the article

• Best way to test class methods without running __init__

  - by KenFar

  I've got a simple class that gets most of its arguments via init, which also runs a variety of private methods that do most of the work. Output is available either through access to object variables or public methods. Here's the problem - I'd like my unittest framework to directly call the private methods called by init with different data - without going through init. What's the best way to do this? So far, I've been refactoring these classes so that init does less and data is passed in separately. This makes testing easy, but I think the usability of the class suffers a little.

  Read the article

• JPA Bidirectional OneToMany and ManyToOne?

  - by PhoenixJon

  I'm using Oracle JDeveloper 11g Release 2. I created two tables A and B using SQL developer. Table A has a FK to table B. Using the Entities from Tables function, I created two JPA files from it. A has @ManyToOne annotation on FK. And also B has @OneToMany annotation to A. I don't want this. Can I remove this @OneToMany annotation automatically? public class A implements Serializable { ... @ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name = "FIELD_B") private B b; ... } public class B implements Serializable { ... @OneToMany(mappedBy = "B") private List<A> assetList; ... } I don't need @OneToMany mapping.

  Read the article

• Determine if FieldInfo is compiler generated backingfield

  - by Steffen

  The title pretty much says it all, how do I know if I'm getting a compiler generated backingfield for a {get; set;} property ? I'm running this code to get my FieldInfos: Class MyType { private int foo; public int bar {get; private set; } } Type type = TypeOf(MyType); foreach (FieldInfo fi in type.GetFields(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly | BindingFlags.NonPublic)) { // Gets both foo and bar, however bar is called <bar>k__backingfield. } so the question is, can I somehow detect that the FieldInfo is a backingfield, without relying on checking its name ? (Which is pretty undocumented, and could be broken in next version of the framework)

  Read the article

• I cannot get mlocManager.removeUpdates(mlocListener); to work

  - by Colin

  I have an app that uses the LocationManage functions which works well until the app is stopped or paused. The location listener function is still carrying on in the background. Relevant bits of code follow. When I click home or back the onstop() function is being triggered correctly. package uk.cr.anchor; import android.app.Activity; import android.content.Context; import android.location.Location; import android.location.LocationListener; import android.location.LocationManager; import android.media.MediaPlayer; import android.media.RingtoneManager; import android.net.Uri; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.View; import android.widget.EditText; import android.widget.TableRow; import android.widget.Toast; import android.widget.ToggleButton; import android.content.SharedPreferences; import android.graphics.Color; public class main extends Activity { /** Called when the activity is first created. */ private LocationManager mlocManager; private LocationListener mlocListener; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); LocationManager mlocManager = (LocationManager)getSystemService(Context.LOCATION_SERVICE); LocationListener mlocListener = new MyLocationListener(); mlocManager.requestLocationUpdates( LocationManager.GPS_PROVIDER, 0, 0, mlocListener); } @Override protected void onStop(){ stoplistening(); super.onStop(); } /* Class My Location Listener */ public class MyLocationListener implements LocationListener { @Override public void onLocationChanged(Location loc) { loc.getLatitude(); loc.getLongitude(); etc etc etc } private void stoplistening() { if (mlocManager != null) { Toast.makeText( getApplicationContext(), "kill", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show(); mlocManager.removeUpdates(mlocListener); } else { Toast.makeText( getApplicationContext(), " not kill", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show(); } } } I always get the "not kill" message. Can anyone help me!

  Read the article

• Object reference not set to an instance of an object

  - by Ste

  I have this function that create runtime textbox: int i = 0; private TextBox[] addressBox = new TextBox[100]; private void appendNewTab() { addressBox[i] = new TextBox(); addressBox[i].KeyPress += new KeyPressEventHandler(this.addressBox_KeyPress); i++; } void addressBox_KeyPress(object sender, KeyPressEventArgs e) { if (e.KeyChar == (char)13) { MessageBox.Show(addressBox[i].Text); } } but i have Object reference not set to an instance of an object here MessageBox.Show(addressBox[i].Text); any suggestion?

  Read the article

• [C++] Simple inheritance question

  - by xbonez

  I was going over some sample questions for an upcoming test, and this question is totally confusing me. Any help would be appreciated. Consider the following code: class GraduateStudent : public Student { ... }; If the word "public" is omitted, GraduateStudent uses private inheritance, which means which of the following? GraduateStudent objects may not use methods of Student. GraduateStudent does not have access to private objects of Student. No method of GraduateStudent may call a method of Student. Only const methods of GraduateStudent can call methods of Student.

  Read the article

• java: useful example of a shutdown hook?

  - by Jason S

  I'm trying to make sure my Java application takes reasonable steps to be robust, and part of that involves shutting down gracefully. I am reading about shutdown hooks and I don't actually get how to make use of them in practice. Is there a practical example out there? Let's say I had a really simple application like this one below, which writes numbers to a file, 10 to a line, in batches of 100, and I want to make sure a given batch finishes if the program is interrupted. I get how to register a shutdown hook but I have no idea how to integrate that into my application. Any suggestions? package com.example.test.concurrency; import java.io.File; import java.io.FileNotFoundException; import java.io.FileOutputStream; import java.io.PrintWriter; public class GracefulShutdownTest1 { final private int N; final private File f; public GracefulShutdownTest1(File f, int N) { this.f=f; this.N = N; } public void run() { PrintWriter pw = null; try { FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(this.f); pw = new PrintWriter(fos); for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) writeBatch(pw, i); } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { pw.close(); } } private void writeBatch(PrintWriter pw, int i) { for (int j = 0; j < 100; ++j) { int k = i*100+j; pw.write(Integer.toString(k)); if ((j+1)%10 == 0) pw.write('\n'); else pw.write(' '); } } static public void main(String[] args) { if (args.length < 2) { System.out.println("args = [file] [N] " +"where file = output filename, N=batch count"); } else { new GracefulShutdownTest1( new File(args[0]), Integer.parseInt(args[1]) ).run(); } } }

  Read the article

• How to test that action uses argument?

  - by Caster Troy

  I am supposed to be using test-driven development but in this particular case, as I am having trouble, I implemented the action method first. It looks like this: public ViewResult Index(int pageNumber = 1) { var posts = repository.All(); var model = new PagedList<Post>(posts, pageNumber, PageSize); return View(model); } Both the repository and the PagedList<> have been tested already. Now I want to verify that when the action is given a page number that the page number is actually considered. private Mock<IPostsRepository> repository; private HomeController controller; [Test] public void Index_Doohickey() { var actual = controller.Index(2); // .. How do I test that the controller actually uses the page number here? }

  Read the article

• Mistake in dispaly and insert method (double - ended queue)

  - by MANAL

  1) My problem when i make remove from right or left program will be remove true but when i call diplay method the content wrong like this I insert 12 43 65 23 and when make remove from left program will remove 12 but when call display method show like this 12 43 65 and when make remove from right program will remove 23 but when call display method show like this 12 43 Why ?????? ); and when i try to make insert after remove write this Can not insert right because the queue is full . first remove right and then u can insert right where is the problem ?? Please Help me please 2) My code FIRST CLASS class dqueue { private int fullsize; //number of all cells private int item_num; // number of busy cells only private int front,rear; public int j; private double [] dqarr; //========================================== public dqueue(int s) //constructor { fullsize = s; front = 0; rear = -1; item_num = 0; dqarr = new double[fullsize]; } //========================================== public void insert(double data) { if (rear == fullsize-1) rear = -1; rear++; dqarr[rear] = data; item_num++; } public double removeLeft() // take item from front of queue { double temp = dqarr[front++]; // get value and incr front if(front == fullsize) front = 0; item_num --; // one less item return temp; } public double removeRight() // take item from rear of queue { double temp = dqarr[rear--]; // get value and decr rear if(rear == -1) // rear = item_num -1; item_num --; // one less item return temp; } //========================================= public void display () //display items { for (int j=0;j //========================================= public int size() //number of items in queue { return item_num; } //========================================== public boolean isEmpty() // true if queue is empty { return (item_num ==0); } } SECOND CLASS import java.util.Scanner; class dqueuetest { public static void main(String[] args) { Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in); System.out.println(" Welcome here** "); System.out.println(" * Mind Of Programming Group*** "); System.out.println(" _________________________ "); System.out.println("enter size of your dqueue"); int size = input.nextInt(); dqueue mydq = new dqueue(size); System.out.println(""); System.out.println("enter your itemes"); //===================================== for(int i = 0;i<=size-1;i++) { System.out.printf("item %d:",i+1); double item = input.nextDouble(); mydq.insert(item); System.out.println(""); } //===================================== int queue =size ; int c = 0 ; while (c != 6) { System.out.println(""); System.out.println("**************************"); System.out.println(" MAIN MENUE"); System.out.println("1- INSERT RIGHT "); System.out.println("2- REMOVE LEFT"); System.out.println("3- REMOVE RIGHT"); System.out.println("4- DISPLAY"); System.out.println("5- SIZE"); System.out.println("6- EXIT"); System.out.println("**************************"); System.out.println("choose your operation by number(1-6)"); c = input.nextInt(); switch (c) { case 1: if (queue == size) System.out.print("Can not insert right because the queue is full . first remove right and then u can insert right "); else { System.out.print("enter your item: "); double item = input.nextDouble(); mydq.insert(item);} break; case 2: System.out.println("REMOVE FROM REAR :"); if( !mydq.isEmpty() ) { double item = mydq.removeLeft(); System.out.print(item + "\t"); } // end while System.out.println(""); mydq.display(); break; case 3: System.out.println("REMOVE FROM FRONT :"); if( !mydq.isEmpty() ) { double item = mydq.removeRight(); System.out.print(item + "\t"); } // end while System.out.println(""); mydq.display(); break; case 4: System.out.println("The items in Queue are :"); mydq.display(); break; case 5: System.out.println("The Size of the Queue is :"+mydq.size()); break; case 6: System.out.println("Good Bye"); break; default: System.out.println("wrong chiose enter again"); } //end switch } //end while } // end main }//end class

  Read the article

• Java reflection field value in extends class

  - by Lukasz Wozniczka

  Hello i hava got problem with init value with java reflection. i have got simple class public class A extends B { private String name; } public class B { private String superName; } and also i have got simple function: public void createRandom(Class<T> clazz , List<String> classFields){ try { T object = clazz.newInstance(); for(String s : classFields){ clazz.getDeclaredField(s); } } catch(Exception e){ } } My function do other stuff but i have got problem because i have got error : java.lang.NoSuchFieldException: superName How can i set all class field also field from super Class using reflection ??

  Read the article

• How to rotate a figure without moving around the stage(actionscript)

  - by Mister PHP

  package { import flash.display.MovieClip; import flash.events.Event; public class Bullet extends MovieClip { private var mc:MovieClip; public function Bullet() { mc = new MovieClip(); mc.graphics.beginFill(0); mc.graphics.drawRect(120, 120, 40, 40); mc.graphics.endFill(); addChild(mc); addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, onEnterFrame); } private function onEnterFrame(e:Event):void{ mc.rotation += 10; } } } how can i make the rotation of the circle without moving him around the stage, just staying in the place he was before and just rotate, not moving anywhere is that posible?? if you try this code you'll see that the circle is rotating and moving around the stage, so that i don't want, how can i change this?

  Read the article

• Does the following indicate a bad design?

  - by Mewzer

  Hello, I was wondering whether you think the following code usually indicates a bad design ... class X { public: ... private: Y y; }; Class Y { public: Y( X& value ){ x = value; }; private: X& x; } (i.e. there is some sort of cyclic dependency between the classes X and Y).

  Read the article

• Explicit constructor still has default values even though a default constructor is not invoked.

  - by Phoenix

  According to my understanding a default constructor initializes the state of the object to default values, so if i provide an explicit no-arg public constructor like this then how are the values of d and e still getting initialized to zero because in this case the default constructor is not invoked. public class B extends A{ private int d; private int e; public B() { System.out.println(d); System.out.println(e); } } EDIT:: The only thing default constructor does is call to super() then how come if i have a explicitly mentioned a constructor here and A has a protected variable say c which is initialized to 17 in its constructor. Should I not be explicitly calling super() to be able to see that change since I'm using my own constructor ? Why is B still getting the value of 17 through inheritance ?

  Read the article

• How to use multiple restrictions in C# Generics properly?

  - by plouh

  I am attempting to bind c# generics to a class and an interface like this: public class WizardPage<T> where T : UserControl, IWizardControl { private T page; public WizardPage( T page ) { this.page = page; } } And use it with this: public MyControl : UserControl, IWizardControl { //... } Somehow C# doesn't seem to be able to decide that MyControl is a proper instance of T as public class Wizard<T> where T : UserControl, IWizardControl { private WizardPage<T> Page1; public Wizard( MyControl control ) { this.Page1 = new WizardPage(control); } } fails with error The best overloaded method match for 'Controls.WizardPage.WizardPage(T)' has some invalid arguments Am I doing something wrong or is this just not going to work?

  Read the article

• Question about custom events

  - by Malfist

  I'm making custom events for C# and sometimes it isn't working. This is how I'm making the event happen: private bool isDoorOpen; public bool IsDoorOpen { get { return isDoorOpen;} private set { isDoorOpen = value; DoorsChangeState(this, null);} } And these are the event declarations: //events public delegate void ChangedEventHandler(Elevator sender, EventArgs e); public event ChangedEventHandler PositionChanged; public event ChangedEventHandler DirectionChanged; public event ChangedEventHandler BreaksChangeState; public event ChangedEventHandler DoorsChangeState; This works as long as there are methods attached to the events, but if there isn't, it throws a null ref exception. What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• Extend base class properties

  - by user1888033

  I need your help to extend my base class, here is the similar structure i have. public class ShowRoomA { public audi AudiModelA { get; set; } public benz benzModelA { get; set; } } public class audi { public string Name { get; set; } public string AC { get; set; } public string PowerStearing { get; set; } } public class benz { public string Name { get; set; } public string AC { get; set; } public string AirBag { get; set; } public string MusicSystem { get; set; } } //My Implementation class like this class Main() { private void UpdateDetails() { ShowRoomA ojbMahi = new ShowRoomA(); GetDetails( ojbMahi ); // this works fine } private void GetDetails(ShowRoomA objShowRoom) { objShowRoom = new objShowRoom(); objShowRoom.audi = new audi(); objShowRoom.audi.Name = "AUDIMODEL94CD698"; objShowRoom.audi.AC = "6 TON"; objShowRoom.audi.PowerStearing = "Electric"; objShowRoom.benz= new benz(); objShowRoom.audi.Name = "BENZMODEL34LCX"; objShowRoom.audi.AC = "8 TON"; objShowRoom.audi.AirBag = "Two (1+1)"; objShowRoom.audi.MusicSystem = "Poineer 3500W"; } } // Till this cool. // Now I got requirement for ShowRoomB with replacement of old audi and benz with new models and new other brand cars also added. // I don't want to modify GetDetails() method. by reusing this method additional logic i want to apply to my new extended model. // Here I struck in designing my new model of ShowRoomB (base of ShowRoomA) ... I have tried some thing like... but not sure. public class audiModelB:audi { public string JetEngine { get; set; } } public class benzModelB:benz { public string JetEngine { get; set; } } public class ShowRoomB { public audiModelB AudiModelB { get; set; } public benzModelB benzModelB { get; set; } } // My new code to Implementation class like this class Main() { private void UpdateDetails() { ShowRoomB ojbNahi = new ShowRoomB(); GetDetails( ojbNahi ); // this is NOT working! I know this object does not contain base class directly, still some what i want fill my new model with old properties. Kindly suggest here } } Can any one please give me solutions how to achieve my extending requirement for base class "ShowroomA" Really appreciated your time and suggestions. Thanks in advance,

  Read the article

• as3 this.graphics calls do nothing

  - by zzz

  class A: [SWF(width='800',height='600',frameRate='24')] public class A extends MovieClip { private var b:B; public function A(){ super(); b = new B(); addChild(b); addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, update); } private function update(e:Event):void { b.draw(); } } class B: public class B extends MovieClip { public function draw():void { //! following code works well if put in constructor, but not here this.graphics.beginFill(0xff0000); this.graphics.drawCircle(200,200,50); } } this.graphics calls do nothing in draw method, but work fine inside B`s constructor, what i am doing wrong ?

  Read the article

• Performance implications of using a variable versus a magic number

  - by Nathan

  I'm often confused by this. I've always been taught to name numbers I use often using variables or constants, but if it reduces the efficiency of the program, should I still do it? Heres an example: private int CenterText(Font font, PrintPageEventArgs e, string text) { int recieptCenter = 125; int stringLength = Convert.ToInt32(e.Graphics.MeasureString(text, font)); return recieptCenter - stringLength / 2; } The above code is using named variables, but runs slower then this code: private int CenterText(Font font, PrintPageEventArgs e, string text) { return 125 - Convert.ToInt32(e.Graphics.MeasureString(text, font) / 2); } In this example, the difference in execution time is minimal, but what about in larger blocks of code?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194  | Next Page >