Search Results

Search found 14313 results on 573 pages for 'private clouds'.

Page 185/573 | < Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >

• How to find Key and IV value from .Net to PHP

  - by PHP-Prabhu

  Can any one please let me know is there any way to find a solution for the below stuffs. I need to find out the KEY and IV value from the below byte array. the byte array in .net and this has to be convert into KEY(string) and IV(string) via PHP. private static readonly byte[] Key = { 0xda, 0x3c, 0x35, 0x6f, 0xbd, 0xd, 0x87, 0xf0, 0x9a, 0x7, 0x6d, 0xab, 0x7e, 0x82, 0x36, 0xa, 0x1a, 0x5a, 0x77, 0xfe, 0x74, 0xf3, 0x7f, 0xa8, 0xaa, 0x4, 0x11, 0x46, 0x6b, 0x2d, 0x48, 0xa1 }; private static readonly byte[] IV = { 0x6d, 0x2d, 0xf5, 0x34, 0xc7, 0x60, 0xc5, 0x33, 0xe2, 0xa3, 0xd7, 0xc3, 0xf3, 0x39, 0xf2, 0x16 };

  Read the article

• How to get value from Java object

  - by JSF User

  I have this Java object private List<NewAccountObj> dataList; public class NewAccountObj { private int userid; public NewAccountObj(int userid) { this.userid = userid; } public int getUserid() { return userid; } public void setUserid(int userid) { this.userid = userid; } public List<NewAccountObj> getdataList() { return dataList; } What is the proper way to access a value from the object? Is this correct? <h:inputText id="userid" value="#{NewAccountController.dataList.userid}" validator="#{ValidatorAccountController.validateUserID}" autocomplete="off"> <f:ajax event="blur" render="useridvalidator" /> </h:inputText> Is there any other solution?

  Read the article

• IList<T> and IReadOnlyList<T>

  - by Safak Gür

  My problem is that I have a method that can take a collection as parameter that, Has a Count property Has an integer indexer (get-only) And I don't know what type should this parameter be. I would choose IList<T> before .NET 4.5 since there is no other indexable collection interface for this and arrays implement it, which is a big plus. But .NET 4.5 introduces the new IReadOnlyList<T> interface and I want my method to support that, too. How can I write this method to support both IList<T> and IReadOnlyList<T> without violating the basic principles like DRY? Can I convert IList<T> to IReadOnlyList<T> somehow in an overload? What is the way to go here? Edit: Daniel's answer gave me some pretty ideas, I guess I'll go with this: public void Do<T>(IList<T> collection) { DoInternal(collection, collection.Count, i => collection[i]); } public void Do<T>(IReadOnlyList<T> collection) { DoInternal(collection, collection.Count, i => collection[i]); } private void DoInternal<T>(IEnumerable<T> collection, int count, Func<int, T> indexer) { // Stuff } Or I could just accept a ReadOnlyList<T> and provide an helper like this: public static class CollectionEx { public static IReadOnlyList<T> AsReadOnly<T>(this IList<T> collection) { if (collection == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("collection"); return new ReadOnlyWrapper<T>(collection); } private sealed class ReadOnlyWrapper<T> : IReadOnlyList<T> { private readonly IList<T> _Source; public int Count { get { return _Source.Count; } } public T this[int index] { get { return _Source[index]; } } public ReadOnlyWrapper(IList<T> source) { _Source = source; } public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator() { return _Source.GetEnumerator(); } IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() { return GetEnumerator(); } } } Then I could call Do(array.AsReadOnly())

  Read the article

• can the keyword 'this' be used in an abstract class in java

  - by Reddy

  I tried with below example, it is working fine. I expected it to pick sub-class's value since object won't be created for super class (as it is abstract). But it is picking up super class's field value only. Please help me understand what is the concepts behind this? abstract class SuperAbstract { private int a=2; public void funA() { System.out.println("In SuperAbstract: this.a "+a); } } class SubClass extends SuperAbstract { private int a=34; } I am calling new SubClass.funA(); I am expecting it to print 34, but it is printing 2.

  Read the article

• can this keyword be used in an abstract class in java

  - by Reddy

  I tried with below example, it is working fine. I expected it to pick sub-class's value since object won't be created for super class (as it is abstract). But it is picking up super class's field value only. Please help me understand what is the concepts behind this? abstract class SuperAbstract { private int a=2; public void funA() { System.out.println("In SuperAbstract: this.a "+a); } } class SubClass extends SuperAbstract { private int a=34; } I am calling new SubClass.funA(); I am expecting it to print 34, but it is printing 2.

  Read the article

• Performance implications of using a variable versus a magic number

  - by Nathan

  I'm often confused by this. I've always been taught to name numbers I use often using variables or constants, but if it reduces the efficiency of the program, should I still do it? Heres an example: private int CenterText(Font font, PrintPageEventArgs e, string text) { int recieptCenter = 125; int stringLength = Convert.ToInt32(e.Graphics.MeasureString(text, font)); return recieptCenter - stringLength / 2; } The above code is using named variables, but runs slower then this code: private int CenterText(Font font, PrintPageEventArgs e, string text) { return 125 - Convert.ToInt32(e.Graphics.MeasureString(text, font) / 2); } In this example, the difference in execution time is minimal, but what about in larger blocks of code?

  Read the article

• How to test that action uses argument?

  - by Caster Troy

  I am supposed to be using test-driven development but in this particular case, as I am having trouble, I implemented the action method first. It looks like this: public ViewResult Index(int pageNumber = 1) { var posts = repository.All(); var model = new PagedList<Post>(posts, pageNumber, PageSize); return View(model); } Both the repository and the PagedList<> have been tested already. Now I want to verify that when the action is given a page number that the page number is actually considered. private Mock<IPostsRepository> repository; private HomeController controller; [Test] public void Index_Doohickey() { var actual = controller.Index(2); // .. How do I test that the controller actually uses the page number here? }

  Read the article

• Why is my Type.GetFields(BindingFlags.Instance|BindingFlags.Public) not working?

  - by granadaCoder

  My code can see the non-public members, but not the public ones. Why? FieldInfo[] publicFieldInfos = t.GetFields(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public); is returning nothing. Note: I'm trying to get at the properties on the abstract class as well as the concrete class. (And read the attributes as well). The MSDN example works with the 2 flags (BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public) but my mini inheritance example below does not. private void RunTest1() { try { textBox1.Text = string.Empty; Type t = typeof(MyInheritedClass); //Look at the BindingFlags *** NonPublic *** int fieldCount = 0; while (null != t) { fieldCount += t.GetFields(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic).Length; FieldInfo[] nonPublicFieldInfos = t.GetFields(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic); foreach (FieldInfo field in nonPublicFieldInfos) { if (null != field) { Console.WriteLine(field.Name); } } t = t.BaseType; } Console.WriteLine("\n\r------------------\n\r"); //Look at the BindingFlags *** Public *** t = typeof(MyInheritedClass); FieldInfo[] publicFieldInfos = t.GetFields(BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public); foreach (FieldInfo field in publicFieldInfos) { if (null != field) { Console.WriteLine(field.Name); object[] attributes = field.GetCustomAttributes(t, true); if (attributes != null && attributes.Length > 0) { foreach (Attribute att in attributes) { Console.WriteLine(att.GetType().Name); } } } } } catch (Exception ex) { ReportException(ex); } } private void ReportException(Exception ex) { Exception innerException = ex; while (innerException != null) { Console.WriteLine(innerException.Message + System.Environment.NewLine + innerException.StackTrace + System.Environment.NewLine + System.Environment.NewLine); innerException = innerException.InnerException; } } public abstract class MySuperType { public MySuperType(string st) { this.STString = st; } public string STString { get; set; } public abstract string MyAbstractString { get; set; } } public class MyInheritedClass : MySuperType { public MyInheritedClass(string ic) : base(ic) { this.ICString = ic; } [Description("This is an important property"), Category("HowImportant")] public string ICString { get; set; } private string _oldSchoolPropertyString = string.Empty; public string OldSchoolPropertyString { get { return _oldSchoolPropertyString; } set { _oldSchoolPropertyString = value; } } [Description("This is a not so importarnt property"), Category("HowImportant")] public override string MyAbstractString { get; set; } }

  Read the article

• C#, cannot understand this error?

  - by 5YrsLaterDBA

  I am using VS2008. I have a project, SystemSoftware project, connect with a database and we are using L2E. I have a RuntimeInfo class which contains some shared information there. It looks like this: public class RuntimeInfo { public const int PWD_ExpireDays = 30; private static RuntimeInfo thisObj = new RuntimeInfo(); public static string AndeDBConnStr = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["AndeDBEntities"].ConnectionString; private RuntimeInfo() { } /// <summary> /// /// </summary> /// <returns>Return this singleton object</returns> public static RuntimeInfo getRuntimeInfo() { return thisObj; } } Now I added a helper project, AndeDataViewer, to the solution which creates a simple UI to display data from the database for testing/verification purpose. I don't want to create another set of Entity Data Model in the helper project. I just added all related files as a link in the new helper project. In the AndeDataViewer project, I get the connection string from above RuntimeInfo class which is a class from my SystemSoftware project as a linked file. The code in AndeDataViewer is like this: public class DbAccess : IDisposable { private String connStr = String.Empty; public DbAccess() { connStr = RuntimeInfo.AndeDBConnStr; } } My SystemSoftware works fine that means the RuntimeInfo class has no problem there. But when I run my AndeDataViewer, the statement inside above constructor, connStr = RuntimeInfo.AndeDBConnStr; , throws an exception. The exception is copied here: System.TypeInitializationException was unhandled Message="The type initializer for 'MyCompany.SystemSoftware.SystemInfo.RuntimeInfo' threw an exception." Source="AndeDataViewer" TypeName="MyCompany.SystemSoftware.SystemInfo.RuntimeInfo" StackTrace: at AndeDataViewer.DbAccess..ctor() in C:\workspace\SystemSoftware\Other\AndeDataViewer\AndeDataViewer\DbAccess.cs:line 17 at AndeDataViewer.Window1.rbRawData_Checked(Object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) in C:\workspace\SystemSoftware\Other\AndeDataViewer\AndeDataViewer\Window1.xaml.cs:line 69 at System.Windows.RoutedEventHandlerInfo.InvokeHandler(Object target, RoutedEventArgs routedEventArgs) .... InnerException: System.NullReferenceException Message="Object reference not set to an instance of an object." Source="AndeDataViewer" StackTrace: at MyCompany.SystemSoftware.SystemInfo.RuntimeInfo..cctor() in C:\workspace\SystemSoftware\SystemSoftware\src\systeminfo\RuntimeInfo.cs:line 24 InnerException: I cannot understand this because it looks fine to me but why there is an exception? we cannot access static variable when a class is a linked class? A linked class should be the same as the local class I think. "Linked" here means when I add file I use "Add As Link".

  Read the article

• getting usb com port

  - by I__

  i have this function: private string GetUSBComPort() { string[] sPorts = SerialPort.GetPortNames(); foreach (string port in sPorts) { if (port != "COM1" && port != "COM4") { return port; } } return null; } this function is being called from form load: private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { serialPort1 = new SerialPort(GetUSBComPort()); if (serialPort1.IsOpen) { serialPort1.Close(); } serialPort1.Open(); //ThreadStart myThreadDelegate = new ThreadStart(ReceiveAndOutput); //Thread myThread = new Thread(myThreadDelegate); //myThread.Start(); this.serialPort1.DataReceived += new SerialDataReceivedEventHandler(sp_DataReceived); } the function is unfortunately returning null how do i get the com port to which my phone is attached to via USB?

  Read the article

• Can you data bind to a property that contains parameter in Silverlight?

  - by rip

  In silverlight, can you bind to a property that contains parameter? For example, the following doesn’t seem to work. Am I missing something or is this not possible? C# private System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, string> ValuesField = new System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, string>(); public string Value { get { return ValuesField(FieldName); } set { ValuesField(FieldName) = value; } } VB Private ValuesField As New System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary(Of String, String) Public Property Value(ByVal FieldName As String) As String Get Return ValuesField(FieldName) End Get Set(ByVal value As String) ValuesField(FieldName) = value End Set End Property XAML <TextBox Name="TextBox1" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="120"Text="{Binding Path=Value[MyField],Mode=TwoWay }" />

  Read the article

• Advantages of GitHub over Bitbucket for Git Repositories [closed]

  - by rolve

  Now that Bitbucket also supports Git repositories, it seams to me that it is a good alternative to GitHub, especially since its free plan includes unlimited private repositories, which is not available on GitHub. Yet, GitHub seams much more popular. Are there any major reasons to choose GitHub as the hosting site for Git repositories instead of Bitbucket? (Although I have no problems with making my personal projects publicly available in general, I like the idea of being able to make the switch from public to private or vice versa any time I want. But if there are some good reasons to use GitHub, I would be willing to give up this freedom.)

  Read the article

• Is it a good or bad practice to call instance methods from a java constructor?

  - by Steve

  There are several different ways I can initialize complex objects (with injected dependencies and required set-up of injected members), are all seem reasonable, but have various advantages and disadvantages. I'll give a concrete example: final class MyClass { private final Dependency dependency; @Inject public MyClass(Dependency dependency) { this.dependency = dependency; dependency.addHandler(new Handler() { @Override void handle(int foo) { MyClass.this.doSomething(foo); } }); doSomething(0); } private void doSomething(int foo) { dependency.doSomethingElse(foo+1); } } As you can see, the constructor does 3 things, including calling an instance method. I've been told that calling instance methods from a constructor is unsafe because it circumvents the compiler's checks for uninitialized members. I.e. I could have called doSomething(0) before setting this.dependency, which would have compiled but not worked. What is the best way to refactor this? Make doSomething static and pass in the dependency explicitly? In my actual case I have three instance methods and three member fields that all depend on one another, so this seems like a lot of extra boilerplate to make all three of these static. Move the addHandler and doSomething into an @Inject public void init() method. While use with Guice will be transparent, it requires any manual construction to be sure to call init() or else the object won't be fully-functional if someone forgets. Also, this exposes more of the API, both of which seem like bad ideas. Wrap a nested class to keep the dependency to make sure it behaves properly without exposing additional API:class DependencyManager { private final Dependency dependency; public DependecyManager(Dependency dependency) { ... } public doSomething(int foo) { ... } } @Inject public MyClass(Dependency dependency) { DependencyManager manager = new DependencyManager(dependency); manager.doSomething(0); } This pulls instance methods out of all constructors, but generates an extra layer of classes, and when I already had inner and anonymous classes (e.g. that handler) it can become confusing - when I tried this I was told to move the DependencyManager to a separate file, which is also distasteful because it's now multiple files to do a single thing. So what is the preferred way to deal with this sort of situation?

  Read the article

• What's wrong with the architecture of a game object drawing and updating itself?

  - by Ricket

  What are the reasons for and against a game object drawing and updating itself? For example, if you have a game where the player has a position on screen, why not have an all-encompassing class: public class Player { private int x, y, xVelocity, yVelocity; private Sprite s; //... public Player() { // load the sprite here, somehow? } public void draw(CustomGraphicsClass g) { g.draw(s, x, y); } public void update(long timeElapsed) { x += (xVelocity * timeElapsed); y += (yVelocity * timeElapsed); } } What is wrong with this design? What are the downfalls or concerns? How would you better write something like this, or better architect this type of thing in a game? Also, somewhat connected, how would you implement loading that Sprite image? And furthermore, how would you then implement collision between two Players? (I should probably separate these extra two questions into new questions, huh?)

  Read the article

• Detecting new MMS (Android 2.1)

  - by Asahi

  I'd like to recognize arrival of new MMS msg (after it is downloaded to inbox). I am doing the following: private MMSContentObserver mMmsCO; public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); h = new Handler(); mMmsCO = new MMSContentObserver(h); getContentResolver().registerContentObserver (Uri.parse("content://mms"), true, mMmsCO); } where private class MMSContentObserver extends ContentObserver { public MMSContentObserver(Handler h) { super(h); } @Override public boolean deliverSelfNotifications() { return false; } @Override public void onChange(boolean selfChange) { super.onChange(selfChange); } } However, onChange is not getting called. What am I missing? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Git: How do I rewind the Master branch on the remote origin

  - by user277260

  I made 5 commits to Master branch when bug hunting on a private project and pushed them to the remote origin (my own private vps). Then I saw that commits 4 and 5 were going to cause trouble elsewhere and I need to undo them, so I checked out commit 3 again, made a new branch "Dev" from that point, and did a few more commits fixing the issue properly. Then I did git reset --hard HEAD~2 on Master to pull it back to the point that I branched Dev. Then I did git merge to fast forward Master back to the end of the Dev branch. So now I have a local repository, with Dev and Master both pointing to the same, up to date version of the project with the latest bug fix. Problem is, when I try to push the project now to the origin, it fails and gives me an error message: ! [rejected] master - master (non-fast forward) error: failed to push some refs to 'myserver...myproject.git' What have I done wrong, and how do I fix it? Thanks

  Read the article

• Flex Filterfunction - Filter by Array of values

  - by Anandh

  How to filter an Arraycollection by "array of values" rather than a single value (simple comparision) , the below code snippet is for filtering by single value now I went into scenario like filter out only price [10,4,1,8] (some random values from the master collection). Is there any better way to do the second code snippet Filter function simple comparision private function filterForTestData(item:Object):Boolean{ if(item.price < slider.value) return true; else return false; } Filter by array of values private function filterForTestData(item:Object,filterBy:Array= [10,4,1,8]):Boolean{ for(randomprice in filterBy) return item.price == randomprice; } [Edited] Apply Filter testData.filterFunction = filterForTestData;

  Read the article

• Transparently storing class state without exposing implementation

  - by RoToRa

  I have a model (MVC) class whose internal state (which basically contains of private int fields) I want to store. The program is running on Android (for now) so I need to store the in a Bundle, but I'll be using the same class later in a desktop application where I'll have to store the state some other way, so I can't reference Bundle directly in my class. So my question is: What is the best way to store (and retrieve) the state of a class without exposing it's implementation? The best I could think of removing the private access modifier so that the fields become package accessible and create read/write helper classes in the same package, but that somehow seems wrong.

  Read the article

• Explicit constructor still has default values even though a default constructor is not invoked.

  - by Phoenix

  According to my understanding a default constructor initializes the state of the object to default values, so if i provide an explicit no-arg public constructor like this then how are the values of d and e still getting initialized to zero because in this case the default constructor is not invoked. public class B extends A{ private int d; private int e; public B() { System.out.println(d); System.out.println(e); } } EDIT:: The only thing default constructor does is call to super() then how come if i have a explicitly mentioned a constructor here and A has a protected variable say c which is initialized to 17 in its constructor. Should I not be explicitly calling super() to be able to see that change since I'm using my own constructor ? Why is B still getting the value of 17 through inheritance ?

  Read the article

• Mistake in display and insert methods (double-ended queue)

  - by MANAL

  1) My problem when i make remove from right or left program will be remove true but when i call diplay method the content wrong like this I insert 12 43 65 23 and when make remove from left program will remove 12 but when call display method show like this 12 43 65 and when make remove from right program will remove 23 but when call display method show like this 12 43 Why ?????? ); and when i try to make insert after remove write this Can not insert right because the queue is full . first remove right and then u can insert right where is the problem ?? Please Help me please 2) My code FIRST CLASS class dqueue { private int fullsize; //number of all cells private int item_num; // number of busy cells only private int front,rear; public int j; private double [] dqarr; //========================================== public dqueue(int s) //constructor { fullsize = s; front = 0; rear = -1; item_num = 0; dqarr = new double[fullsize]; } //========================================== public void insert(double data) { if (rear == fullsize-1) rear = -1; rear++; dqarr[rear] = data; item_num++; } public double removeLeft() // take item from front of queue { double temp = dqarr[front++]; // get value and incr front if(front == fullsize) front = 0; item_num --; // one less item return temp; } public double removeRight() // take item from rear of queue { double temp = dqarr[rear--]; // get value and decr rear if(rear == -1) // rear = item_num -1; item_num --; // one less item return temp; } //========================================= public void display () //display items { for (int j=0;j<item_num;j++) // for every element System.out.print(dqarr[j] +" " ); // display it System.out.println(""); } //========================================= public int size() //number of items in queue { return item_num; } //========================================== public boolean isEmpty() // true if queue is empty { return (item_num ==0); } } SECOND CLASS import java.util.Scanner; class dqueuetest { public static void main(String[] args) { Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in); System.out.println(" ***** Welcome here***** "); System.out.println(" ***** Mind Of Programming Group***** "); System.out.println(" _____________________________________________ "); System.out.println("enter size of your dqueue"); int size = input.nextInt(); dqueue mydq = new dqueue(size); System.out.println(""); System.out.println("enter your itemes"); //===================================== for(int i = 0;i<=size-1;i++) { System.out.printf("item %d:",i+1); double item = input.nextDouble(); mydq.insert(item); System.out.println(""); } //===================================== int queue =size ; int c = 0 ; while (c != 6) { System.out.println(""); System.out.println("************************************************"); System.out.println(" MAIN MENUE"); System.out.println("1- INSERT RIGHT "); System.out.println("2- REMOVE LEFT"); System.out.println("3- REMOVE RIGHT"); System.out.println("4- DISPLAY"); System.out.println("5- SIZE"); System.out.println("6- EXIT"); System.out.println("************************************************"); System.out.println("choose your operation by number(1-6)"); c = input.nextInt(); switch (c) { case 1: if (queue == size) System.out.print("Can not insert right because the queue is full . first remove right and then u can insert right "); else { System.out.print("enter your item: "); double item = input.nextDouble(); mydq.insert(item);} break; case 2: System.out.println("REMOVE FROM REAR :"); if( !mydq.isEmpty() ) { double item = mydq.removeLeft(); System.out.print(item + "\t"); } // end while System.out.println(""); mydq.display(); break; case 3: System.out.println("REMOVE FROM FRONT :"); if( !mydq.isEmpty() ) { double item = mydq.removeRight(); System.out.print(item + "\t"); } // end while System.out.println(""); mydq.display(); break; case 4: System.out.println("The items in Queue are :"); mydq.display(); break; case 5: System.out.println("The Size of the Queue is :"+mydq.size()); break; case 6: System.out.println("Good Bye"); break; default: System.out.println("wrong chiose enter again"); } //end switch } //end while } // end main }//end class

  Read the article

• can we use layout in Customview ?

  - by UMMA

  friends, i have a custom view class public class Zoom extends View { private Drawable image; private int zoomControler=20; public Zoom(Context context) { super(context); image=context.getResources().getDrawable(R.drawable.icon); setFocusable(true); } @Override protected void onDraw(Canvas canvas) { super.onDraw(canvas); //TransparentPanel tp = new TransparentPanel(this.getContext()); //Button MyButton = new Button(this.getContext()); //MyButton.setText("Press me"); //tp.addView(MyButton); image.setBounds((getWidth()/2)-zoomControler, (getHeight()/2)-zoomControler, (getWidth()/2)+zoomControler, (getHeight()/2)+zoomControler); image.draw(canvas); } } can i use SetContentView(R.layout.mylayout) in this custom view to display that design? or how can i display button with image ondraw method as i have commented the code ? any help would be appreciated.

  Read the article

• StructureMap: How can i unit test the registry class?

  - by Marius

  I have a registry class like this: public class StructureMapRegistry : Registry { public StructureMapRegistry() { For<IDateTimeProvider>().Singleton().Use<DateTimeProviderReturningDateTimeNow>(); } I want to test that the configuration is according to my intent, so i start writing a test: public class WhenConfiguringIOCContainer : Scenario { private TfsTimeMachine.Domain.StructureMapRegistry registry; private Container container; protected override void Given() { registry = new TfsTimeMachine.Domain.StructureMapRegistry(); container = new Container(); } protected override void When() { container.Configure(i => i.AddRegistry(registry)); } [Then] public void DateTimeProviderIsRegisteredAsSingleton() { // I want to say "verify that the container contains the expected type and that the expected type // is registered as a singleton } } How can verify that the registry is accoring to my expectations? Note: I introduced the container because I didn't see any sort of verification methods available on the Registry class. Idealy, I want to test on the registry class directly.

  Read the article

• Forward declaring an enum in c++

  - by szevvy

  Hi guys, I'm trying to do something like the following: enum E; void Foo(E e); enum E {A, B, C}; which the compiler rejects. I've had a quick look on Google and the consensus seems to be "you can't do it", but I can't understand why. Can anyone explain? Many thanks. Clarification 2: I'm doing this as I have private methods in a class that take said enum, and I do not want the enum's values exposed - so, for example, I do not want anyone to know that E is defined as enum E { FUNCTIONALITY_NORMAL, FUNCTIONALITY_RESTRICTED, FUNCTIONALITY_FOR_PROJECT_X } as project X is not something I want my users to know about. So, I wanted to forward declare the enum so I could put the private methods in the header file, declare the enum internally in the cpp, and distribute the built library file and header to people. As for the compiler - it's GCC.

  Read the article

• How to port C# code which uses a callback to VB.NET?

  - by Bob

  I need to port the following from the ASP.NET MVC 2 sourcecode from C# to VB.NET. It's from AuthorizeAttribute.cs beginning on line 86: HttpCachePolicyBase cachePolicy = filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Cache; cachePolicy.SetProxyMaxAge(new TimeSpan(0)); cachePolicy.AddValidationCallback(CacheValidateHandler, null /* data */); where CacheValidateHandler is: private void CacheValidateHandler(HttpContext context, object data, ref HttpValidationStatus validationStatus) { validationStatus = OnCacheAuthorization(new HttpContextWrapper(context)); } The VB.NET port from http://converter.telerik.com doesn't quite work for this line: cachePolicy.AddValidationCallback(CacheValidateHandler, Nothing) ' Error where CacheValidateHandler is: Private Sub CacheValidateHandler(ByVal context As HttpContext, ByVal data As Object, _ ByRef validationStatus As HttpValidationStatus) validationStatus = OnCacheAuthorization(New HttpContextWrapper(context)) End Sub VS2008 complains that CacheValidateHandler does not specify its arguments for context, data, and validationStatus. Any ideas how to port this code?

  Read the article

• How to return a 'read-only' copy of a vector

  - by michael

  Hi, I have a class which has a private attribute vector rectVec; class A { private: vector<Rect> rectVec; }; My question is how can I return a 'read-only' copy of my Vector? I am thinking of doing this: class A { public: const vect<Rect>& getRectVec() { return rectVect; } } Is that the right way? I am thinking this can guard against the callee modify the vector(add/delete Rect in vector), what about the Rect inside the vector?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >