Search Results

Search found 5295 results on 212 pages for 'transaction scope'.

Page 20/212 | < Previous Page | 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27  | Next Page >

  • GHCi error: Not in scope

    - by dmindreader
    I'm trying to compile this function from Learn You a Haskell for Great Good. removeNonUppercase st = [ c | c <- st, c `elem` ['A'..'Z']] by placing it into a removeNonUpperCase.hs file. It compiles fine, but when passing the argument: ghci> removeNonUppercase "Hahaha! Ahahaha!" the compiler says: <interactive>:1:0: Not in scope: 'removeNonUpperCase' Why?

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework without Transaction?

    - by Sue
    Is there a way to use EF without transaction? I have very simple single insert and don't want to roll-back when something goes wrong as there may be a trigger logging then raising error from the DB side which I have no control over. I just want to insert then catch any exceptions but don't want to roll-back.

    Read the article

  • mysql innodb max size of transaction

    - by chris
    Using mysql 5.1.41 and innodb I'm doing some data import, but can't use load data infile, so I'm manually issuing insert statements. I found that it's much faster to disable auto commit and issue say, 100 insert statements and then commit, instead of the implicit commit after each insert. It got me thinking, what limits are there to how much data I can put into a transaction? Is there a limit on the number of statements, or does it have to do with the size in bytes etc...?

    Read the article

  • Compiler error: memset was not declared in this scope

    - by michael
    Hi, I am trying to compile my c program in ubuntu 9.10 (gcc 4.4.1). I am getting this error: Rect.cpp:344: error: ‘memset’ was not declared in this scope But the problem is I have already included in my cpp file: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> And the same program compiles fine under ubuntu 8.04 gcc 4.2.4). Please tell me what am i missing. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How to detect a pending JDO transaction?

    - by Stevko
    I believe I am getting JDO commit Exceptions due to the transactions nesting although I'm not sure. Will this detect the situation where I am starting a transaction when another is pending? PersistenceManager pm = PersistenceManagerFactory.get().getPersistenceManager(); assert pm.currentTransaction().isActive() == false : "arrrgh"; pm.currentTransaction().begin(); Is there a better or more reliable way?

    Read the article

  • Explicit specialization in non-namespace scope

    - by Mark
    template<typename T> class CConstraint { public: CConstraint() { } virtual ~CConstraint() { } template <typename TL> void Verify(int position, int constraints[]) { } template <> void Verify<int>(int, int[]) { } }; Compiling this under g++ gives the following error: Explicit specialization in non-namespace scope 'class CConstraint' In VC, it compiles fine. Can anyone please let me know the workaround?

    Read the article

  • Transaction Management

    - by Senthilnathan
    Hi all, In my code I am updating two table, one after the other. update(table1_details); update(table2_details); So if the update fails in table1 , table2 should not be updated or should be rolled back. How to handle this situation. I know I have to use transaction. Can some one help with code !!! I am using Java with spring and hibernate .

    Read the article

  • How to set the transaction isolation level of a

    - by Michael Wiles
    How do I set the global transaction isolation level for a postgres data source. I'm running on jboss and I'm using hibernate to connect. I know that I can set the isolation level from hibernate, does this work for Postgres? This would be by setting the hibernate.connection.isolation hibernate property to 1,2,4,8 - the various values of the relevant static fields. I'm using the org.postgresql.xa.PGXADataSource

    Read the article

  • "session" bean scope in a web application - reliable ?

    - by EugeneP
    Can you rely on this scope and be sure that every time 1) a new session starts, the Spring bean will be initialized with default values 2) while session is kept alive, the current object will store its state during session life, will never be lost or corrupted and can always be got with [webappcontext].getBean ?

    Read the article

  • How to Shrink Transaction log in sql server database in replication

    - by Renju
    Hi I'm having a production database and its replicated report database. How to shrink the transaction log files in the production database as the log file size is increasing. I had tried DBCC SHRINKFILE and SHRINKDATABASE commands but it does not work for me. I can't detach and shrink and attach back as the db in replication. Please help me in this issue.

    Read the article

  • The PROMOTE TRANSACTION request failed because there is no local transaction active.

    - by Mark J Miller
    Under what circumstances would I see the above message? I have a single call to SQL Server which is wrapped in a call to TransactionScope. In our development and QA environments MSDTC is turned off and the call succeeds fine. However, in our production environment with MSDTC turned on we are failing with this call. Is there something that would cause this when I am sure we are not looking at a distributed transaction call at all?

    Read the article

  • Rolling back a transaction in a Grails Service

    - by UltraVi01
    I have been updating all my services to be transactional by using Grail's ability to rollback when a RuntimeException is thrown in the service. I have, in most cases, doing this: def domain = new Domain(field: field) if (!domain.save()) { throw new RuntimeException() } Anyways, I wanted to verify that this indeed will rollback the transaction... it got me thinking as to whether at this point it's already been committed.. Also, if not, would setting flush:true change that? I am not very familiar with how Spring/Hibernate does all of this :)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27  | Next Page >